/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/70078396/1236286421.0.jpg)
Tomorrow’s film session won’t be pleasant for the Wizards — at least when they’re talking defense. The Atlanta Hawks are a good team, but the Wizards blew assignments, missed rotations and repeatedly failed to close out on shooters, and the Hawks lit them up with 118 points in just 94 possessions.
The Wizards entered last night’s game dead last in contested shots, and then challenged a season low 26 Hawks attempts, according to NBA.com tracking data. That’s about 20 fewer contests than their season average.
Atlanta took advantage of the lax defense by posting a .536 effective field goal percentage. Trae Young and Bogdan Bogdanovic did a good job of getting into the lane and drawing fouls or finding teammates for easy baskets...or fouls. The Hawks ended the night 29-29 from the free throw line.
The Wizards were a perfect 16-16 from the free throw line, but lost that battle by 13. They also got thumped on the offensive glass — the Hawks grabbed 13 offensive rebounds (somehow, the statue known as Danilo Gallinari got four) and had a mid-90s-esque 31.0% offensive rebound rate.
What kept Washington in the game was Atlanta playing almost equally lax defense. The Hawks contested just 25 Wizards field goal attempts. This was not a stellar example of quality defensive basketball — from either team.
Quick thoughts on individual players:
- Spencer Dinwiddie played an outstanding, nearly mistake-free game on the offensive end. His combination of efficient scoring and playmaking produced 18 points for the Wizards on just 13 possessions used.
- Deni Avdija provided a nice demonstration of the value a player can have when he takes and makes open shots, attacks with the dribble when he has a clear advantage, plays with effort on defense and avoids mistakes. He won’t shoot 4-5 most nights, but he may be starting to sketch out how he succeeds in the NBA.
- Bradley Beal continues to inefficiently guzzle offensive possessions. Last night, he had a usage rate of 31.4% and an offensive rating of just 97 — in a game where his team’s ortg was 21 points higher. His shooting was good (efg: 54.8%), but he committed 4 turnovers. He entered the night with the highest turnover rate of his career, and it got worse. The Wizards will need him to turn things around on offense.
Four Factors
Below are the four factors that decide who wins and loses in basketball — shooting (efg), rebounding (offensive rebounds), ball handling (turnovers), fouling (free throws made).
I’ve simplified them a bit. While the factors are usually presented as percentages, that’s more useful over a full season. In a single game, the raw numbers in each category are easier to understand.
PACE is possessions per 48 minutes.
Wizards 111 at Hawks 118
FOUR FACTORS | HAWKS | WIZARDS |
---|---|---|
FOUR FACTORS | HAWKS | WIZARDS |
EFG | 0.536 | 0.552 |
OREB | 13 | 7 |
TOV | 11 | 12 |
FTM | 29 | 16 |
PACE | 94 | |
ORTG | 125 | 118 |
Key Stats
After the double overtime win over the Boston Celtics, I introduced the Player Production Average (PPA) Game Score (very similar to the one I used to call Scoreboard Impact Rating). PPA is my overall production metric, which credits players for things they do that help a team win (scoring, rebounding, playmaking, defending) and dings them for things that hurt (missed shots, turnovers, bad defense, fouls).
Game Score (GmSC) converts individual production into points on the scoreboard in this game. The scale is the same as points and reflects each player’s total contributions for the game. The lowest possible GmSC is zero.
PPA is a per possession metric designed for larger data sets. In small sample sizes, the numbers can get weird. But, some readers prefer it so...why not both? Reminder: in PPA, 100 is average, higher is better and replacement level is 45. For a single game, replacement level isn’t much use, and I reiterate the caution about small samples producing weird results.
Now numbers.
POSS is the number of possessions each player was on the floor in this game.
PTS = points scored
ORTG = offensive rating, which is points produced per individual possessions x 100. League average last season was 112.3.
USG = offensive usage rate. Average is 20%.
ORTG and USG are slightly modified versions of stats created by Wizards assistant coach Dean Oliver and modified slightly by me. ORTG is an efficiency measure that accounts for the value of shooting, offensive rebounds, assists and turnovers. USG includes shooting from the floor and free throw line, offensive rebounds, assists and turnovers.
Wizards: Key Stats
WIZARDS | MIN | POSS | PTS | ORTG | USG | PPA | GmSC | +/- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WIZARDS | MIN | POSS | PTS | ORTG | USG | PPA | GmSC | +/- |
Spencer Dinwiddie | 29 | 56 | 14 | 135 | 23.4% | 204 | 25.5 | 12 |
Deni Avdija | 18 | 35 | 9 | 182 | 10.7% | 201 | 15.6 | 8 |
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope | 30 | 59 | 11 | 121 | 14.8% | 99 | 12.9 | -15 |
Bradley Beal | 34 | 67 | 24 | 97 | 31.4% | 86 | 12.8 | -19 |
Corey Kispert | 11 | 22 | 5 | 169 | 10.1% | 244 | 12.0 | 12 |
Kyle Kuzma | 34 | 66 | 18 | 111 | 21.4% | 72 | 10.6 | -7 |
Montrezl Harrell | 33 | 66 | 13 | 129 | 17.8% | 61 | 8.8 | 1 |
Aaron Holiday | 14 | 27 | 5 | 168 | 11.2% | 119 | 7.1 | 12 |
Davis Bertans | 3 | 6 | 2 | 234 | 15.0% | 218 | 2.9 | -12 |
Daniel Gafford | 15 | 29 | 4 | 93 | 18.5% | 38 | 2.4 | -8 |
Raul Neto | 19 | 38 | 6 | 95 | 23.0% | 4 | 0.4 | -19 |
Hawks: Key Stats
HAWKS | MIN | POSS | PTS | ORTG | USG | PPA | GmSC | +/- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAWKS | MIN | POSS | PTS | ORTG | USG | PPA | GmSC | +/- |
Bogdan Bogdanovic | 34 | 68 | 16 | 185 | 13.4% | 251 | 27.4 | 20 |
John Collins | 31 | 62 | 12 | 161 | 15.5% | 213 | 21.2 | 7 |
Clint Capela | 33 | 65 | 16 | 180 | 13.2% | 188 | 19.7 | 2 |
Danilo Gallinari | 17 | 33 | 12 | 139 | 25.0% | 303 | 16.0 | 0 |
Cam Reddish | 27 | 53 | 15 | 121 | 21.8% | 172 | 14.7 | 2 |
Trae Young | 36 | 71 | 26 | 110 | 33.2% | 95 | 10.9 | 19 |
Delon Wright | 12 | 23 | 2 | 136 | 10.3% | 168 | 6.3 | -12 |
De'Andre Hunter | 27 | 53 | 11 | 91 | 16.7% | 21 | 1.8 | 5 |
Gorgui Dieng | 10 | 19 | 2 | 75 | 18.2% | -20 | 0.0 | 0 |
Lou Williams | 13 | 25 | 6 | 75 | 26.8% | -72 | 0.0 | -8 |
Loading comments...