Hey, we were in it for three quarters...
Box Score.
Game Flow.
Post recap.
Times recap.
Post: Wizards better at defense than Spurs. This is misleading on so many levels, which we'll discuss.
DC Pro Sports Report.
Wizards Insider.
Highest plus/minus: Nick Young (0).
Lowest plus/minus: Caron Butler (-22).
Oh well. Life goes on. San Antonio's a much better team than us, particularly offensively, where they simply haven't gotten enough credit in past years. Tony Parker proved why he should be in the discussion as the best point guard in basketball, Tim Duncan continues to do his thing, and Manu Ginobili is playing as well as ever. Throw in great three-point shooters and the underrated, unselfish play of Fabricio Oberto, and you have an offensive juggernaut. Our biggest defensive weaknesses are stopping penetrating point guards, defending the three, and dealing with big teams, so what you saw shouldn't have been a surprise.
Defensively, San Antonio is slipping a bit, but are we really beating them at their own game? Tonight's game proved there's more to playing defense that preventing your opponent from shooting a good percentage. The Wizards shot 46.7 percent from the field and 53 percent from three, and that could have been better had they not struggled in the second half. So what happened? San Antonio didn't foul (13 fouls the entire game), held the Wizards to one shot (only 6 offensive rebounds for one of the best offensive rebounding teams in the league), and took away Butler and Jamison by bodying them and daring them to drive, which is the one thing both struggle with at times. San Antonio's been doing all those things this year, which explains why, despite allowing teams to shoot a high percentage, they're still an above-average defensive team. Could they be better? Sure, but they're still better than us. Much better.
This was a good game for Caron Butler to grow from. When he shot the ball, he was his typical self, scoring 16 points on 5-9 shooting with two threes, but you could tell that he was frustrated by Bruce Bowen's off-ball defense. Bowen's always been known as a great on-ball defender, but he doesn't get enough credit for his off-ball defense, and it showed tonight. Even when he got the ball, Butler was content to mostly shoot over Bowen, since he was so exhausted from having to free himself. So far, Butler's improvement has come from his improved range, but now that the secret it out, he needs to respond better to bodying tactics. That means driving to the rim when defenders play close, and finishing over big men.
As for Antawn Jamison, I think this was one of those games where he should have played less than 39 minutes. San Antonio's best offense, besides turning Tony Parker loose in the open floor, is their spectacular high-low game with Duncan and Oberto. This is why Oberto is so key for them, because few big men pass as well as he does. The key is stopping Oberto from catching the ball, and if he does, disturbing his range of motion. Jamison, quite simply, isn't going to do that, both because he isn't capable and because he won't try. It would have been nice to replace Jamison with Blatche and go with the big frontcourt, if only to better match up with San Antonio's big lineup. Jamison was struggling offensively anyway, and Brendan would have picked up the slack, considering how effectively he was scoring in the post.
That was one minor Eddie blunder. The other, though far less serious, was playing Roger Mason over Nick Young. Young was a little out of control when he played, but even then, he provides more than Mason, who really is just a three-point shooter. The problem with playing Mason is San Antonio is the best in the league as forcing opponents off the three-point line, so they basically render guys like Mason useless. Young has a better mid-range game, and that's the shot the Spurs will give up, so playing Mason over Young reeks of "experience over talent."
In the end, though, San Antonio's just better. Nothing Eddie could have done would have changed that. I'm happy with getting a split on the Texas trip.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Observation
I must say I am impressed with Nick Young. He looked so clueless in Summer League that I figured he would take a long time to be anything but a net negative. But he looks so comfortable out there now. He dribbles himself into trouble more than I would like, but I have been impressed by both his 3-point shooting and his ability to finish around the basket. He's shooting .421 from 3-point range and .871 from the line. (Yeah, .380 from the field overall, but that's gonna come up.) If he continues to improve at this rate, he'll be a genuine asset before Gil returns.
by Vanilla Gorilla on Nov 29, 2007 2:14 PM EST reply actions
Ah, the typical letdown game.
To me, this game illustrated the need for the Wizards to get a legit backup point guard. Tony Parker really caught fire in the third and fourth periods - after Mason and Stevenson/Young were given the task of guarding him. (Not to say he wasn't good in the 1st half.) We need someone to come in and spell Daniels and not have the offense come to a grinding halt. We also need someone that can come close to the speed of the league's point guards. DeShawn and Mason just don't cut it against quick point guards.
Also, I thought that Caron got off his game tonight. He shot a high percentage - but I would have rather seen him get more agressive than to be so cautious. We can't have him not score in the fourth. Jamison was also frustrated by poor shot selection and poor (in my opinion) officiating.
The positives were the play of Nick Young and Brendan Haywood. While Nick didn't make his shots (dude needs to stop bricking his dunks) he provided a nice offensive spark off the bench and drilled his free throws. Haywood did a great job scoring on Tim Duncan (never thought I'd write that), but needed to be more of a presence on the boards. The defense was also much better than the box score would make it seem.
Ah, well. On to Philly!
Nick Young and Sean Elliot
Like some of you, I don't live in DC so I got the game through the Spurs broadcast on the NBA package. I'm not sure if anybody noticed, but Sean Elliot's a grade A jerk. At one point, we pushed the ball up to Deshawn. He looked around, found nobody to pass to, and took an awful shot w/ 20 secs still left on the shot clock. Elliot's comment was "That's Wizards basketball right there." Later, after a wide-open Oberto jump shot, Sean's analysis was: "All you really have to do against the Wizards is execute your offense. They don't have the ability, or the desire, to play defense for 24 seconds." He had some others I can't remember. I guess when you win 3 championships in 5 years or whatever the Spurs have done, even the announcers get egos.
Seriously
spurs game thoughts
i don't know why the wiz didn't go to the jamison/oberto matchup more in the first half, especially down on the blocks. i agree that jamison kept getting no calls when he got fouled. lots of hip checks by oberto. regardless, on the whole AJ played poorly last night.
caron hit some shots, but he didn't look that involved in the game. the team wasn't giving him or jamison the ball enough. but that might have been the spurs denying those guys the ball in their preferred spots. the spurs definitely made those guys uncomfortable. did someone post that they went scoreless in the 4th? wiz won't win that way.
one thing i noticed in this game and the boston game was that both the spurs and celtics trapped jamison and butler when they had the ball and dared them to make a play through their teammates. when this happens, caron and AJ seem to get taken out of the game, and we aren't able to burn teams for trapping those guys. we have to find a way to burn those traps. i wish we could play the spurs 5 games straight and practice playing against their defense.
as for tony parker going off, he does that to a lot of teams. i think the spurs came out to play last night.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Nov 29, 2007 4:40 PM EST reply actions

by 

















