Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Africa Cup Of Nations Final

Spurs 93, Wizards 80

In this league, there are five types of teams.  There are horrible teams, (like Philadelphia and Charlotte), there are mediocre teams (such as Milwaukee, Golden State, and Toronto), there are average to good teams (like the Wizards),there are very good teams (Houston, LA Lakers), and there are great teams.  San Antonio falls into the last category, and they showed it tonight with an awesome defensive effort.  

There's been lots of talk about San Antonio being too old on the perimeter, and when I asked Matthew about it, he echoed those concerns.  But tonight, San Antonio proved that defensive smarts still beat great one-on-one play any day of the week.  I've never seen the Wizards called for so many offensive fouls, and it says something that the Spurs took both Gilbert Arenas and Caron Butler out of the game.  None of the Big 3 were on their game at all, and lots of that has to do with San Antonio's physical, but smart man to man defense.  

Every time the Wizards threatened, San Antonio had a response.  When the Wizards cut the lead to 47-43 early in the third on a Jamison three, the Spurs responded with a devastating 15-0 run.  The Spurs forced four turnovers, two offensive fouls, and got under the skin of Eddie Jordan, who was tossed with two technicals.  Then, the Wizards cut it to 75-67 midway through the fourth, but Manu Ginobili hit two threes and the Spurs went on a 15-4 run to stretch the lead to 21.  As Kelly Dwyer says, the Spurs are just solid.  Tonight proved it.

In thinking about this game, it's the way the Wizards lost that concerns me more than the actual result.  It's the process that matters at this point more than the actual score.  This is the second straight game the Wizards were held under 100 points, and it's also the second straight game that they responded poorly to physical play.  Antonio Daniels was the only guy consistently attacking the net, and nobody was rebounding - the Spurs held a 53-44 advantage, including a 42-25 advantage on the defensive glass.  This was also Arenas' third straight poor game, making me wonder if teams have figured out how to guard him.  Kirk Hinrich, Devin Brown, and Tony Parker have all played Arenas tightly, funneling Arenas to their inside defenders.  It's worked very well, as Arenas had only 5 free thow attempts tonight.

My worry is that, too often, the offense stagnates when Arenas has the ball.  The offensive scheme is designed to get Arenas in a scoring situation, but it often seems like the rest of the team isn't moving to give him another option.  It's easy for opponents to funnel Arenas to a big guy because they don't have to worry about Arenas dishing to a cutter for an easy score.  Nobody's ever there, forcing Arenas to do too much.  That happened tonight far too often.

Overall, it's becoming clear that teams have figured out how to slow this offense.  Now, it's up to the coaching staff to make the necessary adjustments.

Air your grievances here in this space.  Don't be shy!

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

My picks
For the rest of the month i pick the wizards to win every game and the over under on the big 3 to be over, just for the record.

by steelers1016 on Jan 14, 2007 4:33 PM EST reply actions  

Mmm...
I hadn't thought of the possibility of other teams figuring out how to slow our offense down...but don't we rely a lot on jumpers, anyway?  A lot of jump shots that we usually make (like Caron's 16-7 footer, Jamison's floaters, Gil's all-over-the-place shots) didn't fall, which obviously stalled our production and also gave the Spurs opportunities to kill our transition D.  So I'm saying that we played a great deal in having a bad offensive night.

And I hope you're wrong about people figuring out how to guard Gil--you put up a mighty good argument.  But I think that at home, with the friendlier refs and crowd, he'll still get the calls that he usually gets running into big guys, so even in the current offensive scheme Gil can still use his driving ability relatively well.  Also, his shoulder is still sore according to Buck, so that may have stifled his jumper-oriented game and consequently his driving game as well.

As always, I love your analysis Prada.  Trying to respond to yours is humbling...

by miestersean on Jan 14, 2007 6:59 PM EST reply actions  

Humbling?
Wow, I hope I'm not giving off that impression.

I'm confident Gil can adjust, but he did go into a funk earlier in the year, which worries me.

by Mike Prada on Jan 14, 2007 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Randy Wittman Seems to "Get It"

Recent FanPosts

Small
Misusing Vesely
Tumblr_lpbvdtzztv1qc7c5to1_500_small
Best 2012 Draft lottery options?
Steves_small
Attention Mr. Stern - The Big Markets will kill the NBA
Tumblr_lpbvdtzztv1qc7c5to1_500_small
Kaman worth going after?
Small
The Wiz have 4 players worth keeping.
Steve_small
This Is Where I Stand
Stan_marsh_small
Is Kyrie Irving already 'All Star' good?
Unseld_small
Keep the Three Burritoes
Small
Rebuilding the Washington Wizards
Small
Should Wiz try a 2 PG lineup

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

Photo_on_2010-12-10_at_10 Bullet Nation in Exile