Wizards vs. Clippers final score: Washington runs out of gas in 110-103 defeat

Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Spor

The Wizards nearly rallied from a 16-point deficit in L.A.'s building, but couldn't complete the comeback, falling 110-103 to the Clippers and failing again to eclipse .500.

I'm pretty tired right now. It's been a long day, and I just pulled a back-to-back after a similar late night last night. I'm also battling recurring back pain, so I really needed to push myself through this recap. And push myself I shall, because the Wizards pushed themselves against the Clippers when they could have rolled over.

Still, it wasn't enough. The deficit was too large, the flow disrupted by an odd coaching decision to intentionally foul DeAndre Jordan. After cutting the Clippers' double-digit lead down to one, the Wizards ran out of gas, falling, 110-103. Hopefully this recap does not mirror that ending.

I'd have excused the Wizards for slinking away once the Clippers built a 16-point lead midway through the third quarter. Led by a punishing Blake Griffin and a racehorse pace, the Clippers were about to run the Wizards out of the gym. Instead, John Wall commandeered a bigger portion of the offense and the defense stepped up to its Warriors game level, getting arms in passing and dribbling lanes, forcing turnovers and making things miserable.

That comeback continued early in the fourth quarter, thanks to inspired attacking from Bradley Beal and a renewed push once he had to sit because of his minutes limit. With the Clippers up seven, Wall jumped right in and froze the Clippers' D on a three-point play. A possession later, Wall found Nene for a mid-range jumper to cut the Clippers' lead back to two. There were chances to pull even -- a Wall three eerily similar to the Golden State dagger that would have tied the game missed. But the Wizards cut the lead back to one twice, the second time on a Kevin Seraphin layup.

Sadly, that's as close as it'd get, thanks in large part to Randy Wittman's decision to intentionally foul Jordan with the Wizards down three and 2:21 remaining. You can haggle about the analytics of this decision -- as a 40-percent shooter, Jordan is right at the line where the math says you're more likely to allow fewer points per possession putting the ball in his hands than actually playing defense.

But to me, irrespective of the math, it demonstrated a lack of trust in the defense that helped the Wizards get back into the game. It's not like the Wizards weren't getting stops, and in fact, they were often using their defense to create offense. Why kill the flow that you built in rallying? Haralabos Voulgaris said it better than I could.

Obviously, you know the outcome. Jordan hit two free throws, Beal somehow missed two of his own and then DeAndre hit two more to push a three-point lead to seven. That pretty much sealed it.

Unlike other expeditions to get over .500, I have few complaints about this one beyond Wittman's decision late. The Wizards played hard, didn't fold when they could have and pushed an elite team to the limit. Still, a loss is a loss, and it very well could have been a win if they woke up sooner or if Wittman let the game runs its natural course.

OTHER NOTES:

  • I was really happy to see Beal's aggressiveness, especially to begin the fourth quarter. He made quick decisive moves to the hoop, and while he didn't always finish, he sometimes found people with the pass or tilted things enough for someone else to clean up the miss. Even if he doesn't seal the deal, he has to attack.
  • Verrrrryyyy interesting to see Seraphin in the game late instead of Marcin Gortat. I thought Gortat did a pretty solid job protecting the rim, but he let Jordan get too many offensive rebounds, so I understood Wittman's call there.
  • It took way too long to put the offense in Wall's hands in that third quarter. The Wizards kept pounding the post with Nene and Gortat, but all that did was kill the offense's flow. I totally get that there are still games where Wall is wild and something as tried and true as posting up is useful to regain control, but this game wasn't it.
  • Blake Griffin may be a jerk, but he controlled this game in so many ways. Dude's an unbelievable player.
  • We talk a lot about the value of shot creators, an area the Wizards are deficient. You can look no further than the Clippers for more evidence of this. Several Wizards runs were stopped by great individual plays from Jamal Crawford and J.J. Redick, and the Clippers wouldn't have won without those. (And yes, I call Redick a shot creator because his off-ball movement is just as impactful as shooting off the dribble. Point is: he's no mere spot-up shooter.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Bullets Forever

You must be a member of Bullets Forever to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bullets Forever. You should read them.

Join Bullets Forever

You must be a member of Bullets Forever to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bullets Forever. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker