Wizards Vs. Jazz Clipboard: Transition Defense And John Wall's Lack Of Awareness
The Washington Wizards got blown out by the Utah Jazz because their transition defense was horrendous. Utah had 21 transition opportunities in the game, according to mySynergySports.com. That accounted for nearly 19 percent of their plays on Friday, and they scored 1.57 points per possession on those plays. On the season, 12.5 percent of the Jazz's plays are in transition, and they score 1.1 points per possession on them. Clearly, this was a huge problem on Friday.
Good transition defense is a combination of a lot of things. Some of it is scheme -- the best teams often purposely concede offensive rebound opportunities to get back. Some of it is mental toughness, because the most physically demanding portion of the game is in transition, and you have to be able to mentally fight through fatigue. Most of it, though, is simply having court sense and strong basketball IQ.
In watching the tape, there were lots of culprits, but one person that showed up often, to my dismay, was John Wall.
Here's one play from early in the game, when the Wizards were playing well. Chris Singleton took a stepback jumper that fell way short, and Gordon Hayward eventually got a dunk on the other end.
From these two screenshots, you have several problems. Both Trevor Booker and JaVale McGee are crashing the offensive glass, which is OK if there's a legitimate chance for an offensive rebound, but this shot was clearly going to be short. Singleton himself stood there admiring his shot as Hayward snuck behind him. But look at Wall in the right corner. He has absolutely no reason to be standing there. He's not crashing the offensive glass, so what's he doing? Watching the show?
What he should be doing is helping Nick Young stop the Jazz in transition. Instead, he allows Raja Bell to leak out and create an advantage.
With Bell leaking out and Singleton too slow, Young has to guard two people. He shades too far to Bell on the wing, giving Devin Harris the passing lane he needs to find Hayward for the dunk.
Here's another play from late in the second quarter, a pivotal time because the Wizards needed to keep the game close going into halftime. The Wizards run a nice play to free up Young for the jumper, but look at the floor imbalance.
You have Jordan Crawford underneath the hoop for some reason, McGee going for the offensive rebound as you'd expect and Booker, who should be dropping back, sort of watching the ball. But you also have Wall in the deep corner, and as soon as that shot goes up, he needs to drift away from there and up onto the wing. Instead, the ball is in flight, and Wall is just standing there.
Eventually, Harris grabs the rebound, fires a nice outlet to Bell, and the Jazz are in business with three Wizards, including guards Wall and Crawford, trailing the play.
There's four Jazz players across halfcourt, and only Young, who took the shot and retreated as he should have, and a sprinting Booker for the Wizards. Bell forces the issue, then dumps to a trailing Derrick Favors for a dunk and a huge momentum swing at the end of the half.
There were other instances of poor transition defense by other players on the team, so I don't want to single out Wall. But Wall is the superstar of the team, and how he sacrifices sets a culture. He's doing a good job in some areas such as taking charges, but he needs to dramatically improve his transition defense soon, because these are really bad habits to pick up.
62 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good analysis.
I’d not been aware that he was quite so weak in that area.
For all of Youngs shortcomings
He is always the first and oftentimes the only guy back on d
by oakhillswag on Feb 19, 2012 12:59 PM EST via mobile reply actions
That's a system thing...
In Flip’s system (and the System Whitman is still running), the SG is responsible for getting back on defense….
I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.
by Rook6980 on Feb 19, 2012 1:27 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
system...and overlooked when considering his low rebound numbers
the SG being on the perimeter on D also impacts his rebound opportunities…
Failing at transition defense...
means failing to hustle. Pure and simple. There is game going on there, guys.
This is bball 101
thanks for the analysis, Prada. If you can point this out to casual readers, then why can’t the coaching staff point it out to professionals getting paid millions of dollars? i can see from your limited sample size the point you’re making. maybe they don’t want to get the point (the players)? i still motion you and rook should be GM and coach…
and a great blog of course!
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 19, 2012 6:25 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Dont forget to add the lack of low post defense
The Jazz big men had a field day, scoring at will and getting all kinds of rebounds.
Understood
However the opening statement
The Washington Wizards got blown out by the Utah Jazz because their transition defense was horrendous
Gives the impression that transition defense was the sole reason for the azz whooping in Utah when there were many other factors involved, such as the lack of low post defense. Perimeter defense in the 4th qtr was a problem too, but that’s a moot point since they were down by 20 at that point.
by TheRealBigMike on Feb 20, 2012 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
Blame the media not the team
It looks like Booker(?) is setting a pick on Young to clear space for Favors in the next to last frame. I am not quite sure how those 2 ended up getting in each others way. It looks like Young can’t set up for a charge and Booker(?) can’t set up for a block. Oh, those Jazz are clever.
Speaking of..
Whatever happened to guys taking charges? That chart is gathering dust.
by djnnnou on Feb 19, 2012 2:57 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
we see that john has a lack of awareness
and Jeremy has limitless awareness…. He wins yet again.
by thewiz06 on Feb 19, 2012 3:40 PM EST via mobile reply actions
He played well
But man…some of those turnovers were maddening. Lin seriously struggled against the double team.
Great overall game for him though.
by DCeee on Feb 19, 2012 3:44 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
he played ugly at times
but he was playing a very good defensive team and he was their main focus… that to me is why Lin was extremely impressive today.
by koop1122 on Feb 19, 2012 4:44 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
come on Lin is a sloppy player who turns the ball over
More than anyone else in nba history…how is that ’limitless awareness"?
by DCrez on Feb 19, 2012 4:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
he was getting hounded out there with traps off the PnR
and as long as he keeps winning and puts numbers up like he is they can live with the TO’s
sure 7 turnovers sucks but 14 assists and 5 steals is HUGE
by koop1122 on Feb 19, 2012 4:36 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Jeremy Lin at this point is a better point guard than John Wall
and I hope Wall takes that to heart in the offseason. I’d imagine he’s in denial about the whole thing. He has so, so much to learn about being a point guard in the NBA, and I’d like to think he’ll study Lin’s game and implement his strengths and intelligence into his own
by Max Zamphirescu on Feb 19, 2012 4:40 PM EST up reply actions
Walls problem is the team he is playing on
Maybe we can give him Anthony and Stoudemire to start with. Then Smith.
by hambonejackson on Feb 19, 2012 5:02 PM EST up reply actions
And the Knicks beat the Wiz sans all 3
by hambonejackson on Feb 19, 2012 5:05 PM EST up reply actions
What should Wall study?
How to make his threes? How to make his shots in the paint? Of course, but even SGs should study that.
John already has enough turnovers as it is, do you really want him averaging 6+ a game. Sure, he could go out and get 30 ppg and if the team wins you will forget about them like you are with Lin, but don’t get it twisted, PG wise, Lin is no better than Wall.
How to play under control, changing speeds, using picks.
Lin makes the absolute most out of having Chandler by the basket, and despite McGee’s drawbacks, I don’t think anyone can say that Wall’s been best using McGee’s ridiculous talents.
Getting the ball in McGee’s hands anywhere within 5 feet of the basket is a guaranteed two points — a no-look hand-off driving to the rim and getting the defender to commit, a lob to a space where only someone with McGee’s insane athleticism can get it.
Wall needs better players, sure, but has he made ANYONE on our team better?
by Max Zamphirescu on Feb 19, 2012 6:23 PM EST up reply actions
Lin is under control?
Is that why he turns the ball over like no tomorrow? He’s no more under control than Wall is, his mistakes are just overshadowed by his scoring and the team winning.
Changing speeds I can agree with, Lin does this well.
Using picks… wait, there has to be a good pick right? Like, how when Wall and Booker do pick and rolls, it looks so much better. Now imagine good shooters to space out the floor… Lin is no better in this either, especially when the defenses trap him.
And look at McGee’s numbers lately… you think that is from Iso’s or something? That is Wall finding him. Are you trying to tell me Wall doesn’t continuously find McGee for lobs where no one else can get them?…
And who exactly is Lin making play better. Are you trying to say he did this for Chandler? Look at his numbers, he was playing this well before Lin. So who exactly is he making play better?
The pick and roll works
with defensive minded players like a Tyson Chandler (or Booker). Arenas said after being traded to Orlando that he wasn’t used to playing with a player (D. Howard) that could set such a strong pick. I don’t think McGee or Blatche will ever be able to set a strong pick.
Shumpert, Novak, and Fields
are three I’ve noticed are playing significantly better… but most importantly he has made the team MUCH better… and there is no debating he is the difference.
The knack for making winning plays is what impresses me the most about Lin. He’s not a great shooter yet he hit two pull up 3’s with Marion and Dirk in his face in the 4th quarter… he’s not the best defender yet he comes up with big steals late in games… he’s not the best free throw shooter yet he is still fearless and drives to hoop gets fouled and knocks them down.
by koop1122 on Feb 19, 2012 6:54 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Put lin on the Wiz
and we will watch a far less athletic player passing the ball to the same players and yielding the same result. Wall is the better player.
by hambonejackson on Feb 19, 2012 6:59 PM EST up reply actions
Shumpert and Fields are playing better
If I recall correctly Novak wasn’t really getting minutes before. I remember hearing a Knicks podcast where the guy was going nuts that Novak- a guy who JVG claims has one of the purest shots in the league- couldn’t get in the rotation over Bill Walker who is a total mess.
Gotta give Lin a lot of the credit with Novak
he’s a great shooter but Lin has created and found him… without a PG playing the way Lin is right now then there is no use for a player like Novak to be in the rotation
by koop1122 on Feb 19, 2012 7:10 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Fields started playing better before Linsanity started
His numbers pretty much the same as last month’s. In this run, he has had inconsistent shooting, with good rebounding and assists (which he had before Lin). So nope, not playing better.
Shumpert is playing the same except he’s averaging better shooting numbers, mainly because of his games against us and Minnesota. He does look more comfortable off the bench though. That said, a lot of his minutes come with Lin on the bench, so is Lin really the spark of his tiny bit of improvement?
Novak is your only case, but as someone pointed out, he wasn’t getting many minutes before Lin, so to say Lin is the reason for his success is a guess more than anything. And someone on another forum posted an interesting stat. Since Lin has started, the Knicks are +68 with Novak, and -6 without him. How do you know Novak’s shooting isn’t responsible for Lin’s ability to get to the rim? We don’t know either case tbh.
But really, you don’t have much proof to back up those three players as having played better because of Lin. You are right though, the team as a whole is playing better, mainly because Lin himself is playing so well, and knocking down shots. But as far as making others around him better, I think that’s a myth that gets thrown around to any team that is winning games. People used to throw that stuff around for Melo as well, and look how much better the Knicks are doing without him…
Lin has allowed Shumpert play his natural position
You’re obviously set in your thinking but I just have a hard time to watch a team play 100 times better than they were b/c of the emergence of one player, playing the point guard position very well, and just assume that he is not making anyone around him better. I see your point on the numbers but I believe there is a big difference if Fields or Chandler are putting up good numbers while there team is losing bad than making winning plays and playing with more energy on a team that has gone 8-1 in their last 9
by koop1122 on Feb 19, 2012 7:53 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
But that's what happens
when a team is missing a major piece. The team can continue playing as well as they were, but with Lin making the shots he is, they start winning. If you put a player like Kevin Durant on the Wizards, he wouldn’t make the players around him better, but he would certainly make the team better.
You have just look into why NY was losing before Lin. I believe it was because they weren’t making shots. What does Lin do? Make shots. They’ve basically taken a player shooting 40% in Melo, and replaced him with a guy shooting 50% in Lin. In the NBA, that’s the difference between Linning and Wosing (or something like that lol).
You can't just say he makes shots though
b/c he creates for others as well and does a very good job of it… that’s why PG’s get the credit of making players around them better… they make plays that set up their teammates.
Watching the way Dallas played him today makes me believe that Melo can come in and not disrupt the flow of the offense. If teams trap hard on the PnR like Dallas then that just makes the wing players so much more dangerous once Lin draws them out and then finds an open guy to pass to. Gives Melo room to operate if teams make it a point to stop Lin in the PnR
by koop1122 on Feb 19, 2012 11:21 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
carmelo being injured
probably has as much to do with their recent winning ways, in all honesty.
I'll give you turnovers, but he is putting his teammates in a better position to make plays than Wall is, even though Lin has better talent (even with no Melo and mostly no Amar'e) than Wall does
Both Jeremy and John played 10 games this month. Here are their averages:
John Wall
18.6 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 8.5 APG, 4 TO/G, 1 BPG, 1.4 SPG
Made one three point shot out of eight three point shots attempted; 57/69 free throws (82.6% rate); 4 offensive boards
Jeremy Lin
22.7 PPG, 3.6 RPG, 8.4 APG, 5.4 TO/G, 0.2 BPG, 2 SPG
Made ten three point shots out of 30 attempts; 53/74 free throws (71.6% rate); 7 offensive boards
Wall’s advantages are these:
1. Better vertical leap and he is one of the best shot blocking guards in the NBA, especially when he is behind the shooter.
2. Considerably better at free throws. Lin never was above 82% in the FT line in college, so the 70’s is right at his ability level.
3. Still gets over 8 assists a game with considerably crappier talent and with defenses trying to block his passing lanes because they dare him to shoot.
4. Better ball handler. Lin turns over too much. Many of Wall’s TO’s that I have seen are the result of his teammates, rather than himself. Lin has made some bad TO’s, but he is still adjusting to NBA basketball too.
Lin’s advantages are these:
1. Better shooter. Makes a three consistently (he’s no Ray Allen, Reggie Miller, or Rashard Lewis based on this sample size, but it’s clear he can make the shot and Wall can’t.
2. Better closer. He won two games with his shooting at the line or from deep. Wall can’t close in the NBA, but then again, we have insufficient talent to close so this is not really his fault, but still, great players have to close and Lin is delivering on it.
3. Higher IQ. Wall does not have a bad IQ. I think it’s above average for a 21 year old. But Lin wouldn’t be winning without a great feel for basketball angles and concepts (mellow Glenn Consor always throws this point). He is also older than Wall, and coached by Tommy Amaker, the former star from Duke, and also locally at Woodson High School in Fairfax!
4. Better talent around him. Yes, we have to mention it. But talent still needs good IQ if such players intend to get anywhere in the NBA. The Knicks have more of both than the Wizards. This is the big handicap Wall has.
by thewiz06 on Feb 19, 2012 6:14 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't understand
how Lin is putting his teammates in better position to score when Wall is averaging the same assists on a team with worse shooters and less spacing…
I've seen Lin provide a number of 2nd man assists that don't count on the stat sheet (aka hockey assists)
Also he has Shumpert and Fields who are providing about three dimes a game each even with Lin over the last ten games.
Wall has Crawford who averages about three a game and after that no one really averages considerably more than one. So basically Wall is the only guy who produces a considerable number of assists on a consistent basis and Crawford does a little bit.
That's because no one else
either can handle the ball (Booker, Singleton, McGee, etc.) or wants to pass the ball (Nick, Jordan half the time).
And hockey assists usually lead to threes. We are not a good three point shooting team, so a lot of our hockey assists get ruined by bricks.
When the ball does move on the Wizards though, we do look so much better.
Wins
make all those little mistakes disappear. You don’t notice all the little things Lin does wrong (and some major big ones too) because his team is winning. If the Knicks go on a losing streak, all those little mistakes are gonna be talked about as if they just started appearing, when in reality they were there the whole time. Same for Wall, if we win tomorrow, his mistakes aren’t going to be talked about as much if he plays well.
Winning cures all.
by gray16 on Feb 19, 2012 5:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
He's kind of a hack
dont get me wrong, he is a good impactful player and they are winning so that’s that…but it surprises me how many awful plays he makes…..though of course his supposed “bball iq” is off the charts everyone will say….i dont see that, i see a scoring PG who is making big plays, which is great for him, but i dont see some deep Nash-like understanding of the game that John lacks
Good Lin Win against a pretty good opponent...
JR Smith arrived in the nick of time!
If anything is LIN-sane
Some guys wants pay 33K for four tickets against the Hawks, get a signed game-worn jersey by Jeremy, AND meet the man himself….
when will we have these kind of things for John Wall?
:(
Lebron and Kobe established their stardom over time
It’s in everyone’s best interest to create new stars because it gets people hyped about the freshness and newness of it. The more marketable the better.
Lebron instantly was a mega super star and he nearly took an abysmal Cavs team to the playoffs
He significantly upgraded the worst team in basketball.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 20, 2012 5:07 AM EST up reply actions
This isn't really an awareness problem in my point of view
But rather just fatigue. Wall’s been playing great deal of minutes lately, and the Wizards played a tough stretch of schedule. He also often pushes the ball a lot, meaning he probably runs more than our entire team by at least twice. I think he was just tired, and didn’t have the legs to get back on every fast break. While you pointed out all the bad by Wall during the Jazz game, we should know that Wall likes chasing down fast breaks for blocks, that’s one of his best defensive themes (weird for a point guard, but it is, and if we can even say he has any defensive themes.. but anyway). I would like to know if there were other games when he was staying still, but I think a guard staying still has more to do with fatigue and lack of willingness to win compared to lack of awareness. I’m willing to bet that a lot of losing team’s players playing lots of minutes have similar kind of tendencies.
I didn't see the game
but I would think this is what happens. I’ve seen a lot of times where Wall will go full speed a couple times, and then take a few plays off to catch his breath. This may have been one of those instances.
His minutes should be reduced, and he should learn to conserve his energy better.
I agree that wall plays a few too many minutes, should put in Shelvin Mack for about 5 extra minutes per game.
Either that or let Crawford play point guard for 10 minutes a game. He has Great court vision, and actually seems to put up less crazy shots when he know his job is to play the point instead of SG.
No way lol
Remember at the beginning of the season when he was the point guard off the bench. That horrible experiment ended up with him putting up even more shots. He plays better with Mack at point than without him.
Crawford is just a weird person. He can pass the ball as good as anyone on the team, but one game he will actually show it, and the next he must forget he has teammates. He has a Jeckyl/Hyde thing going on, but I’d rather not go back to the experiment of him at point again.
Crawford is a GREAT passer!
But his handle sucks. When he was struggling at the beginning of the year, he could barely get it across half-court in 8 seconds…
Bullets fan stuck in CO.
Shameful.
C’mon, Wall, you should know better than that. Get back on D.
Thanks a lot for this post Mike
Far too often we have to point out that when the ball is in the air (or ground for that matter) and also during the other team’s transition, this team does too much watching.
One of the easiest rules to ensure success on the basketball court is to always be moving, it sickens me how often Wizards players are caught in between watching.
I'm not going to think of something extra witty or clever to say, I don't want to convince you to see things my way, I just have 2 words for you: JEREMY LAMB
This stuff is elementary!
I was taught while i was in High School that as soon as the shot goes up, you immediately find the guy you’re defending, or in the case of a zone, you start heading back to where you’ll be defending (except maybe the center and a forward, to try for offensive rebounds). I don’t understand how professional players will stand there and admire the play when they were taught otherwise in high school.
the second example also shows another problem with wall(and how he's used)
Can anyone explain why he ever goes in to the corner like that? Usually happens when crawford is picking where to go at the top of the 3-pt line. I understand he’s trying to get out of the way, but there has to be somewhere better for wall to stand in these sitations than the corner. He’s not a threat and it leads to bad transition defense as seen here. Also usually produces a pretty poor offensive play.
We can't Compare Wall to Any of this PGs
To do so is like comparing Apples to Oranges, people talk about Irving, Lin, walker..etc. 80% of the WIZ are Rooks and Sophs!!!! Thats Ridiculous!!!! I’d LOVE to see any of the aforementioned PGs come over here and Do something better than WALL has. The truth is If we had the COACH, the Players and the Front office of any of these others, the WIZ would not be the butt of the jokes. But it is what it is….

by 

































