Shhhh...Don't Tell The Wizards There Was A Lockout
Columnist's note: I'm snowboarding in Flagstaff this week and won't be back until mid-Friday. I'll respond to comments then, and as always, thanks for reading!
Why's that, you ask? The season has yet to reach the halfway point, but there have been enough sparks, increasingly more here than there, that recall the team's late season form of the past few years. More concisely, the Wizards look like they're starting to put things together awful early this go-round.
There are a lot of reasons one could point to. Let's start with the obvious; playing with the foundation. The Wizards are building for the future. Obliquely, you don't go team building with contract employees; they're just passing through. The Ten Point Plan calls for low profile veterans on short term deals, acquiring them for the assets the weight of their contracts will bring.
Trying to learn from someone who has their eyes fixed on the clock waiting for quitting time is tough. With the higher profile veterans traded away or nursing injury, the players on the court are the guys the team is supposed to be built on. And they seem to be learning how to fit with each other and feeding off each other's success...funny how that works.
Exodus of the remaining old guard. The quiet revelation of Trevor Booker and Andray Blatche's injury looks to be quietly easing a possibly painful transition period. Dray's a nice guy but his desire to face-up from 18 feet, among other things, just doesn't gel with what this team needs to do. And his general tone of frustrated bewilderment doesn't help the team any more than Flip's did. And Chris Singleton come back! Less Shard is definitely more and we want to keep it that way. He does his best not to hurt the team, and seems to do better at playing within himself in limited minutes. But speaking of Flip...
Randy Wittman plays this team right. The way Flip Saunders tried to run this team is akin to taking a rear wheel drive at speed down a mountain pass with grip driving techniques. Attacking a mountain pass that way with that tool requires drift technique and the higher quality of play since the firing is little surprise to any fan of the team.
All of this is culminating in a higher level of play with better than half the season remaining. Sure, this is normally about the time we see a few encouraging signs, but that's within the span (and pace) of a normal season. Maybe they forgot there was a lockout...but whatever the reason, January and February (and usually most of March) has represented the basketball version of staring into the abyss the last few seasons and, I don't know, things feel like they might be looking up. The players seem to be coming together as a team and the addition by subtraction phase is nearly over. There's nowhere to go but up.
90 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My thoughts were the real Wizards would show up around game 40...
With the lock out, and the less practice time and training camp that came with it I thought it would take about half a normal season for the real team to show (good or bad). I’m looking to do get most of my insight around game 40 and if positive progress shows up before then great.
I think many of us started the year saying we had to be patient because this team was going to have lots of growing pains. However its very easy to fall back into destroy the team when there is a horrible game (I know I definitely have fallen victim to this feeling).
Good post.
by Kuruption on Feb 14, 2012 7:41 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
It's actually pretty simple why this team looks better now
We are starting Trevor Booker, as we should have (or at least given heavy minutes to) at the start of the season. Luckily (and unfortunately) Blatche is sidelined, which forced Flip and Randy to make the decision they should’ve made a long time ago.
Now that he’s playing with better players, Wall’s energy is up, and he’s returned back to his form from last season, and then some. He’s beginning to have better numbers than last season despite his horrid start to the season.
McGee is just doing McGee. Play great some games, look dumb the other ones. Hopefully that asthma problem that was fixed is why he went on such a long run there of bad games, cause he is better than that. But when he plays well its a big help.
But our SG problem is why I’m still not confident in this team. Two very inconsistent players with below poor IQs and a quick trigger lead to us having a lot of problems trying to win games. We are going to have to address this for next season.
Argh! I'm torn!
I love improvement, I love winning. But I also love the number one pick in the daft! What’s that about sacrificing short term gain for long term prosperity?
:(
by BballBrit on Feb 14, 2012 8:08 AM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
for a sec i was wondering if you thought it was better for the wizards to not even play this season because of the nba lockout
I think the charlotte bobcats right now wish that the season was canceled.
by thewiz06 on Feb 14, 2012 8:10 AM EST via mobile reply actions
their best player has been injured. he is back now. they will win some games
they got a nice pick with Biyombo
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
Well, you are optimistic!
I admire you’re uplifting spirit but I don’t share it unfortunately.
In february 2010 Ernie was orded to innitiate a full blown re-build. Step 1 was to get rid of the old core and get expiring contracts back and/or picks. He did get rid of that core, but he didn’t get anything of real value in return. It wasn’t good, but given the circumstances though, it wasn’t horrible either.
Step 2 was to acquire young talent. So far, we have 1 good prospect in John Wall. Ernie can’t be credited for that one though after lucking into the #1 pick ass. Unfortunatelly, Wall has shown he has 1B as his ceiling. That means we still lack a 1A type talent.
Javale McGee could be a building block, but I am still going back and forth on re-signing McGee.
Booker, I think, is and will be a role player. A energy/hustle guy. That doesn’t mean he can’t start but it does mean he is the 5th and ideally the 7th best player on your roster.
Other than that, I don’t see any pieces that are going to be key career rotation players for us. Mack and Singleton have a chance and Blatche should be so ashamed of himself for waisting his career with late night snacks, poor on court effort and off court shananigans.
So, basically we have 1 starter for the future we are building for and bunch of maybe’s.
Step 3 is developing the young core. We have very little talent due to poor execution of the second step and the talent we do have not being developped because the organization as a whole seems rot at it’s core.
Ernie has done next to nothing to facilitate player development, unless you count giving McGee the ‘room’ to be assertive, hiring and paying for his own bigman coach or if you think hiring Jan a shooting coach for 3(!!?) days to completely mess up an allready bad jumper and free throw routine was a good idea.
There are no specialist coaches, there is no defensive coorditnator who could teach the kids where to be and when on the defensive end and the coaching staff just now seems to be figuring out that they didn’t have an offense system that fit the roster.
Other than that, our medical staff has historically been bad and news yesterday on missmanaging Javale’s astma is just the latest in a long line of miss cue’s. We also have no nutriocionist, or player personal to check up on kids like John and Seraphin who became instant millionaires, living on their own for the first time in their lives. Result: eating muffins, orials and McDonalds for dinner every night. Good organizations guide such players. Wizards do not.
To conclude: After acquiring 2 true building blocks with high lottery picks the next step should have been to package the rest of our assets and trade for a good piece at this years’ deadline and then sign another one this summer. Along with the young pieces we would have left after the trade and filling out the roster with servicable vets, we should have been in the race for 6th to 8th seed next year. We are messed up step 2 and 3 so now we just have to brake the bank to make up for that, instead of going forward and becoming competative. Unfortunatelly, Ted doesn’t look like someone who is willing to do that.
We are wáy behind schedule so far and realistically, our future looks rahter bleak.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 8:34 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Not sure if it was intended
but Blatche
waisting his career with late night snacks
is a good pun (if there is such a thing).
by hotplate on Feb 14, 2012 9:00 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
There is such a thing
Puns are awesome, even if just for the groans that often follow.
O yeah, I intended that for sure!
You know my spelling prowes, right? ;-)
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions
Also
I just now noticed I orriginally tried to say Ernie fall ass backwards into the #1 pick, then changed that sentence into lucking into the #1 pick but I forgot to delete the word ass. So….now it’s just kinda in there, lol.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 9:20 AM EST up reply actions
unintentionally stating Dray is "waisting" his career on snacks is about as good as it gets
+1 Dutch!
Hot Plate was the first guy to get waisted.
Boris Diaw is outeating everyone though. He used to be svelte! Must be the hush puppies, grits and red-eye gravy in Charlotte.
I think I lean more towards this sentiment
While I love seeing the growth that we’re witnessing, I don’t think anyone is deluding themselves into thinking the group we have can grow to achieve much of anything. Significant pieces are still missing. That second step really hurt us. As physically able as the team is, the unfortunate fact of the matter is that we’re lacking in basketball talent.
My only hope is that Ted sees how much better the team is playing and how much more quickly the young guys are improving under a coach that is better fitted to them (Randy over Flip) that maybe he’ll realize a similar revelation in growth will happen when we replace the GM with one better suited to the team. If we just needed to maintain something, Ernie would be fine. As far as actually building a franchise, he’s a horror. I’m not super optimistic about this, but Ted didn’t get rich by being stupid. Hopefully he’ll remember that you need to spend money to make money…
by jakenbake on Feb 14, 2012 9:01 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Maybe, time will tell but the reason I think that
is that no elite player (talking Wade, KD, Kobe type) has been outplayed by his matchup as much as Wall is for example. Prada countered that last week by bringing up Deron Williams but I would say Deron Williams is a 1b piece who needs a Dwight Howard (i.e. a 1a piece).
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
oh is that what you mean by 1B. rarely is a point guard the best player on a championship team. magic is the only one that comes to mind. then again, he is the only player in league history that i know that can play and guard all five positions. LeBron is closest to him in that regards
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions
we tend to forget how bad the Sonics/Thunder were Durant's first two years
He put up good individual numbers, but he was a consensus “1B” piece because he didnt make his teammates any better.
True Hoop (can i type that on an SB Nation site?) had an awesome piece in 2009 about how the Thunder was a much better team without him on the court, and how for that team to make the next step, he needed to figure out a way to get his teammates better. You can read the article here:
http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/7047/the-kevin-durant-conundrum
the point is, wall looks like a 1B now, Wade and Kobe were at one point 1Bs to Shaq, and Durant was a 1B for a period too. Sure, its entirely possible that he never becomes the franchise player we want him too, but its not like we havent seen players make that transition before.
by Alpha_Snail on Feb 14, 2012 12:47 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
a very relavent quote from that article
Knowing that just about any NBA general manager would trade his own children for a prospect of Durant’s caliber, I asked Winston if he’d advise his team to accept if the Mavericks were (in some alternate universe) offered Durant for free. “I’d say probably not,” he replied. "I would not sign the guy. It’s simply not inevitable that he’ll make mid-career strides. Some guys do. But many don’t, and he’d have to improve a lot to help a team
by Alpha_Snail on Feb 14, 2012 12:49 PM EST up reply actions
Durant was putting up great numbers in yr 2 though.
.
25.3ppg, 6.5rpg and 2.8apg with 42% from 3pt land and 48% from the field overall. 58% true shooting and a 20.8 PER (anything above 20 is borderline all star)
John? 16.2ppg, 5.0rpg, 7.4apg. Not bad at all, but not stunning either especially since it’s worse than his rookie yr. Alarming however are the 6% from 3 piont land, 40% overall from the field and his abismall TS% (49%) and very mediocre PER (16.3).
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 1:17 PM EST up reply actions
Dwight Howard
might be 1A talent but he is possibly my least favorite player in the league.
This talk of him being a closer – get out of here, Dwight – you can’t shoot FTs.
Why is he so likeable to the media? He whines. He wants out. He wants help. He wants the ball more. If other players made the comments he makes they would be KILLED in the media.
I would not want him in DC despite his talent – he is becoming more dis-likeable than Lebron to me.
Follow me on Twitter - @CougheeMonster
by CougheeMonster on Feb 14, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Ok. But this is not about Dwight. He was just an example to serve my point
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
Booker as 7th best player on your roster
Don’t look now, but he’s currently sporting a 17 PER.
Thought he did a pretty nice job defending Greg Monroe, too. Monroe won’t go 9-for-9 from the charity stripe very often.
I thought Booker was very much overmatched by Monroe, would have liked to see what Ves' length could do
although Monroe has transformed his body, dude looks strong like ox now.
Booker kept Monroe away from his favorite spots, but wasn't able to bother his release
Held Monroe below his season average FG%.
not sure why the focus is always on Booker 'ideally' being a bench player
he’s the 2nd best player on the team right now and it keeps being brought up that in an ideal world he’s coming off the bench. this team is horrible. there isn’t going to be any ideal world situations for this team for the foreseeable future. so in the meantime we should be glad we have improvement at spots and Booker has been an improvement over what was at PF the previous few years. and even more important is that he’s part of the culture change – plays hard, plays unselfishly, works on his game and shows maturity on and off the court. that should be the focus instead of him being a bench player on a good team – cause if he’s a bench player on a good team that means he’s been traded cause this isn’t a good team and won’t be for a while.
Yea-
I see far more upside to Booker than just coming off the bench. He plays a very smart and physical game- themore time he gets on the floor will only make him more confident.
by DCPerspective on Feb 14, 2012 11:13 AM EST up reply actions
Starting or coming off the bench is irrelevant (to me)
I said he is a hustle/energy role player. Haslem is too for example. Ofcourse the Cheatles are very top heavy but on a ‘normal’ good team, he is somewhere between 5 tot 7 in the rotaition.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 11:46 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
because he is a situational matchup at the PF position and he does not rebound enough
he needs to be paired with a double double center, which would instantly drop him down to at least third best player
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
Vale is about that
For the way he gets lambasted, he is playing at a “very good starter” level
by RonJon629 on Feb 14, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
This critique would be more persuasive if you offered specific examples
In effect you say we should draft more excellent players, package our bad players and trade them for someone else’s good players, and then sign top free agents—and then we’ll have a good team. Well, that was easy. Now would you please tell us what trades you have in mind and which free agents and draft picks?
Also, by the way, don’t you see the contradiction in pontificating about the ceilings of Wall, Booker, etc., and then excoriating EG on the subject of player development? If player development is so important then presumably EG could be replaced by someone who would do more in that respect, so how do you know what these second-year players’ ceilings are?
by jmuravchik on Feb 14, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I have done that time and time again
The discussion then becomes that people say stuff like “we don’t know if that deal could have been made or not” and they are right, we don’t. The only thing we do know is that Ernie failed at step 2.
As for their ceilings, I cannot be sure but it’s what I think based on what I see. As I stated in the opening of the comment it is my view, my opinion. You are free to dissagree.
I do think however that elite talent (like Kevin Love for example) develops no matter how bad the situation around him is. That is only very elite players though and I think Wall does need a good envirement, just like Booker needs one etc.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 12:00 PM EST up reply actions
Wall could end up better than Love.
partially because the nature of the league has moved towards PGs, but also because Wall can be an elite defender at his position which Love most likely will not become.
by DCrez on Feb 14, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
what does that mean the nature of the league has moved towards PG?
that it is easier for PGs to make an impact because of the rule changes?
That is a BIG misconception I know a lot of people harbor here. Yes, the rules changed. PG fill out the stat sheet more. Rose is a perfect example. BUT it is offset by the glut of good PGs. The team that will probably win it this year doesnt really even have a PG. At a minimum, he is their fourth best player. And if that holds true, than it is impossible for the PG to be the dominate position.
The nature of the NBA game has not changed: Bigs rule. They dont rule like they used to where if you did not have a top 3 center, you have no chance at all in winning. But the front court is where the scarcity value in talent lies.
We have a very solid PG and no front court. OK, add some shooters at the 2 and 3 and we are a .500 team, around there. We are not contending for a champiionship. You can buy a good PG for 8-10mm per season- a hall of famer like Kidd, Nash. There are three of four good ones coming out EVERY year.
How many good two PF or C come out every year? There might be a dozen in the whole league. And because they are so hard to find, they are the linchpins to a team that can compete for a championship or not.
I can point to ten championship teams that did not have an all star PG that won championships, and in six months there will probably be another. Name three teams aside from the 6’9 Magic Johnson led Lakers that won a championship without an all star in the front court. Every championship team has a front court all star. The league has not changed that. It never will because the fact is there are more 6’0-6’5 men who can play basketball than 6’9-7’2. It is a mathmatical fact.
You do need an all star caliber player in both the front and back court to win a championship. And JW can be that guy for us. But our next step is to land an all star in the front court- preferably a center since there are a lot of good PF out there. And the chance of landing a Bynum, Howard, or Gasol in free agency is nil
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 6:57 PM EST up reply actions
tell that to Miami, or Dallas, or OkC, or Chicago
and yes I know Dirk is 7’, but he is not an example of what you are talking about.
Dirk works. He scores ALOT in the paint. And he needed to be complemented with Chandler before they could win it. They arent winning this year without him, thats for sure
My major point is you need a good front court period, including one all star, and an all star in the back court to have a shot at a championship
Dallas had two all star players in their front court and a hall of famer in the back court.
Our next move is to find an all star PF or C, period. Those thoughts of shooting your way to a championship is very very low odds. You have to shoot well for 16 games in the playoffs, and no one has been able to do it yet. And the magic loaded their whole team with shooters surrounding D Howard who is a beast, hall of fame defensive monster
ORL wont win until Howard learns to score better, and the same is true with OKC and Ibaka…or more correctly, it is very low odds it happens.
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 7:05 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
And I hope you are joking about Miami
LeBron James can play the PF position at an all star level. He is that good and versatile. Bosh is an all-star. Add your front court all star in Wade, and folks you have your 2012 NBA champs
That is the formula. All star front court, one all star at either the 1 or 2. That should be what we are aiming for if we want to seriously compete for a championship
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 7:32 PM EST up reply actions
Want to offer a link
to where you have done that? And want to mention which other building block we should have taken with our 2011 pick? I’m not high on Vesely, but the next player chosen was Biyombo. Would that have been your building block?
Kanter indeed and for 2010
I had DMC, Monroe, Aldrich and George on my list. Aldrich would have been a huge mistake but I had him high on my board. I’m on my phone so I can’t link now.
Again, the discussion than quickly becomes about for example wether a Blatche, McGee + top 10 protected 2011 first would have been enough to entice the Kings to give up DMC (remember Blatche had real value coming of his breakout season).
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
OK, Dutch
You’re getting warm. But the obvious problem with this is “top 10 protected.” Since we were probably going to be in the top ten, what is Sacto’s incentive? You seem to believe that we need what you call “core pieces” and that McGee and Blatche do not qualify as such. Fair enough. But doesn’t Sacto also need “core pieces?” Why would they do this?
Yes, he was the best pick for us at #6. see above for why.
Biyombo will be a good center in three years. He has talent, drive, and will get there
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 7:00 PM EST up reply actions
We'll see.
But of course the same could be said of Veseley.
Do you...
Unfortunatelly, Wall has shown he has 1B as his ceiling. That means we still lack a 1A type talent.
… mean “1B as his ceiling” if he stays in Washington, or “1B as his ceiling” no matter where he plays?
He would be a junior at UK this season had he stayed in college ball.
.
"I'm not present I'm a drug that makes you dream I'm an aerostar I'm a cutlass supreme In the wrong lane Trying to turn against the flow I'm the ocean I'm the giant undertow I'm the ocean..." - N. Young
I think 1B as his ceiling no matter where he plays. Kinda like Deron Williams is showing he is a 1B too, in need of a 1A (Dwight).
I agree that he is still very young, but 21 isn’t that young if you consider Westbrook and KD are only 22 or 23 I believe. In fact the OKC team is younger than our team.
Furthermore PG’s are generally not 1A players. Rose is, but he’s truelly special. I can’t name 1A pg’s in history that has won championships and Rose hasn’t either (although I think he will, as soon as this year or once he gets a better 1B than Boozer.)
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
Fair enough.
.
Let me put it this way, I sure as heck wouldn’t complain if some big guy came in and made himself ‘1A’. I don’t think John would mind, either.
To be honest, I am not sure that isn’t what he enjoyed at UK with DMC. DMC cleaned up a lot of stuff for John and relieved pressure to have to carry everything. I think John really liked having that security down low.
.
"I'm not present I'm a drug that makes you dream I'm an aerostar I'm a cutlass supreme In the wrong lane Trying to turn against the flow I'm the ocean I'm the giant undertow I'm the ocean..." - N. Young
Yes.
And I still cry myself to sleep at night ever since draftday 2010 because Ernie didn’t acquire a second top 5 pick to pair up JW and DMC.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 14, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
Yes, because Philly would have traded their pick for some combination of Haywood, Areanas, Foye, Miller, and Butler
heck, they drafted a player very similar to Butler
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 7:08 PM EST up reply actions
again, that is because the position he plays. name one pg that was the best player on their team that won a championship that is not 6'9 magic johnson
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
Detroit with Isaiah Thomas
and maybe Houston with Sam Cassell :) Some people say Hakeem, but we know differently.
Both Ben and Rasheed Wallace were all stars multiple times
Ben was a 4x all star, 4x DPOY, 6x all NBA defense, and 5x all NBA
Rasheed was an all star 2x
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 7:19 PM EST up reply actions
You are joking with Hakeem, I trust. Detroit had Rodman and John Sally and Bill Lambier
Lambeer was a 4x all star
Rodman, 7x all defensive first team, 2x DPOY, led the league in rebounding 7 times, won 5 championships, and averaged 18 rebounds a game for two years in a row
I dont think Salley was ever an all star but he is high on the list for blocked shots in DET, personified the bad boy pistons, and helped three different teams win the championship
It is a great example of a PG being the best player on his team to win a championship. But the Pistons had a monster front court. Those guys were the bad boys; it wasnt isiah lol
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 7:16 PM EST up reply actions
Keep going...you will see what I mean. You need an all star in both the front and back courts. And all championship teams have loaded back courts except MJ who managed to win with only one all star PF and solid but not special centers
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 7:21 PM EST up reply actions
John Wall 1A or 1B Talent
On offense I have no doubt he will be a A player.
He will have a 5 year run of 25pts FG43% 6.5 Rebs 9.5 assists.
If he adds a 3 or raises the fg% to 45 he is 1A.
But 1A guard is rare because you have to be an elite defender.
Only Wade, Kobe and Jordan come to mind in recent history.
Flip was right when he said John can be a Gary Payton like
defender. Clearly, he has the physical tools, but I haven’t seen any
improvement in his fundamentals. He doesn’t slide his feet,
and tends to gallop leaving him at the mercy of; a change
of direction or screener. John gives everyone a three foot cushion and
relies on his length to contest shots. I’d like to seem him cut that in half.
Play physical using his height and length to pressure guys and dictate
action. With his speed he can apply a lot of pressure and still recover
to a free throw line jumper.
1) hit the weight room
2) defensive slides
3) use your fouls
Wally's World
by forthepeople on Feb 14, 2012 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
considering we dont get the first pick
What position should we mostly be looking to draft. Should we still target a big man, shooting gaurd, or forward? I really like Kidd Gilchrist and Barnes (who’s seem to fell off a little) but I’m not sold on drummond because IV only been able to watch one game of his. But I think adding a star shooting gaurd/ small forward is the best way to go IF we don’t get the first pick.
by no more kwame's in dc on Feb 14, 2012 8:53 AM EST via mobile reply actions
we'll see whose stock rises most...
If we end up in the right range Michael Kidd-Gilchrist looks like a lot of fun…Harrison Barnes not so much
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Feb 17, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Think its a little early to start talking about improvement
Let’s see if they can put together a 2-game winning streak first…
by TheRealBigMike on Feb 14, 2012 9:52 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I think the improvement that BNiE is talking about
is more the style of play… the effort… and the fact that the team doesn’t seem to give up (like they did under Flip)…
I think the improvement has to do with three things:
1. John Wall has slowed down somewhat. We see far fewer 1 on 3 fast breaks with John crashing into three opponents at the rim… Instead, we’re actually seeing (gasp….) actual basketball plays like Pick-and-roll starting to show up in his repertoire.
2. The rotations and roles have solidified under Whitman. With the exception of foul situations, Whitman has pretty much given the most playing time to Wall, McGee, Booker, Young, Vesely and Crawford. There is less Kevin Seraphin and more Jan Vessely. Players know their roles… Young shoots. Booker sets hard screens. McGee plays defense, rebounds. Vesely disrupts the opponent’s offense, sets screens and runs the floor. Shelvin Mack is getting all the back-up PG duties (12-13 minutes a night) – giving John Wall plenty of rest (34.8 minutes a night under Whitman, 38 under Flip).
3. Injuries to key players. We must admit it… that with Blatche out, the team plays with much more energy. There’s more ball movement. More hustle. More intensity. More effort. – Just as effort, intensity, hustle and energy are contagious, so is lackadaisical and lazy play.
I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.
by Rook6980 on Feb 14, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Another major improvement is the offensive flow
This is just an expansion on point 1 that Rook makes. They now get open shots regularly instead of just chucking the ball with 2 seconds left on the shot clock. I’m not disturbed by the fact that they don’t make that many of their open shots. If they had one more shooter in addition to Nick, they’d have a bunch more wins. They’re not ready for the playoffs, but they don’t look like they’d lose to a division three liberal arts college like they did at the start of the year.
by Elvin_is_my_Elvis on Feb 14, 2012 11:37 AM EST up reply actions
All of the Wizards forwards were below average to start the year
Now, I see a Book playing better than average B ball. But we still need stars at the 3 and 4 to make the team a contender.
It’s hard to look at EG’s track record in the draft and hope that we will get a piece that fits the team’s needs in the next lottery.
Patience is no longer a virtue given the current happenings and future expectations with the existing management. There are 10 bloggers on this site that have demonstrated better picking capability than EG in previous drafts, and they don’t get paid millions of dollars to do it.
by Izman on Feb 14, 2012 11:07 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Booker is playing up to his potential, which is great.
Vesely is getting there.
If McGee has turned the corner and can keep posting numbers like the last two games on a regluar basis while controlling his asthma, he is going to get a big payday.
The hating on Young needs to abate a bit. For all the things that drive the people on this site gaga he is averaging 17+ for the second straight season. I expect that he will go off for more than 30 against the Clippers on this road trip, keeping in mind that he will be guarded by Randy Foye and Mo Williams. He might also have a big game tonight in Denver, as he (and mae jude) have a long-standing “thang” with Afflalo.
Most of all, Wall is starting to really lead the team. The light bulb really switched on in the second half against Detroit.
Mack is a competent back-up pg and if he can spell Wall 14-15 min a game, that will pay off in a labor-intensive season like this one.
The rest of the picture is somewhat murkier. Singleton worries me, and I wish someone would write a definitive piece on what is going on between him and his teammates. Crawford is a rolling diaster, the living definition of poor judgment. Seraphin shone briefly but now what? The old guys, with the exception of Shard in spots, are nullities.
What happens as the trade deadline approaches?
by khrabb on Feb 14, 2012 11:42 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
We play portland tonight
LaMarcus may go apeshit on us
Yes, got my opps wrong. Portland is spoiling for a big win.
Aldridge and Batum should have their way.
The balance of power is in the backcourt matchups in this one. If Wall and Young do well against Felton and Matthews, it might at least be close.
Averaging 17 on a bad team isn't anything to write home about...
plenty of guys put up good numbers on bad teams. does he do all the little things we need to win more? he can, but only does it inconsistently. that’s the one big he still needs to work on. one game he’s looking like a future star the next he looks like his head’s not in the game. actually can say that applies quarter by quarter with him.
how come no one else on this team is averaging 17pts or even more?
since it’s so easy to score on a bad team? How come we have so many guys who put up shitty numbers on a bad team?
they cant get a shot off. nick and jc shoot nearly every time they touch the ball. and one of them is on the court almost always
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 7:23 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
they cant get shots off
not because nick or jc are on the floor, but because they cant get shots off.
what does that mean? you think JW stinks?
by les boulez bomber on Feb 14, 2012 8:08 PM EST up reply actions
it means that being able to get your shot off is in itself an nba skill
one that Vesely, and Booker, and Singleton, and Seraphin, and Mack, and many others don’t have to anywhere near the extent that Crawford and Young do. Nick and Jordan arent holding anyone back.
You'd think they'd know there was a lockout by their poor play up to just lately.
You have to figure if Blatche was really bringing us down as we all suspect, then it would take a few weeks to get over the lazy type of play that is Dray. I look at it like this we needed a power player in that spot Blatche is a self described finesse player who mainly throws up klinckers. With him out, Ves and Book can PnR, which I don’t remember Blatche doing to much of.
I wanted to point out that John Wall seems to be a sponge lately, learning other NBA’s PG style and incorporating it in his game. After the DRose game He borrowed the whip pass, after the Lin game He started the bounce pass in the lane.
by Janber on Feb 14, 2012 12:02 PM EST via mobile reply actions
It is starting to look like Eric Gordon is going to
leave NO….do we take another risk on a gimpy knee?
The problem with being bad is we are forced to overpay…
Eric Gordon might be the best SG in the league in five years.
Seriously, the quality of the prospects at the SG position has dropped off a cliff in recent years.
Question: Mid-late 2010’s Eric Gordon is to mid-late 2000’s Kobe Bryant as mid-late 2010’s Nick Young is to mid-late 2000’s ??
How much $$$ is ? worth?
Man I love Gordon as potential Wiz SG
But the injury thing scares the crap out of me. As I see it there are 3 things that could 100% tank this rebuild (which frankly may not be working anyway).
1) Signing too many of our current crappy players to long-term contracts because there isn’t an immediate upgrade (see: Young/Crawford/McGee/Not Amnestying Baltche). I especially feel if you want to keep one, you have to choose JVM or NY.
2) Signing a high-dollar vet who completely falls on his face (and as much as I love EG, this feels like he could be in that situation). We can’t have another big-dollar blown-knee disaster.
3) Missing on this years Lottery pick (or finishing like 6th and getting boned by the NBA again and picking 9th). This is probably the most important of all 3. Hitting this lotto pick on a star makes almost everything else irrelevant.
by Maroon and Black on Feb 14, 2012 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
driving terminology
Grip driving is what everyone does by default, using the grip of their tires to make turns without sacrificing traction, etc. Drifting is initiaing a controlled slide aimed at preserving maximum possible speed around corners. Both require different skill sets and tools when racing and trying to plug the wrong grouping (a la 16-23 foot jumpers via precision offense) typically results in difficulty if not disaster
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Feb 17, 2012 10:58 AM EST up reply actions

by 
























