Was it a mistake to trade away Antawn/Caron?
So let's go back to the start of this rebuilding process and look back at the trades of Caron Butler and Antawn Jamison. What we did with these moves was create cap space and set ourselves up for losing. However, we were already losing at the same pace and haven't used any of the cap space we received. In fact, it appears as though we are waiting on Rashard Lewis' contract to expire in order to make a big splash in the free agency pool. However, Caron Butler's contract would have already expired and Jamison's would expire this summer. Assuming we would still have traded away Arenas for Lewis, we would be able to move his expiring contract for valuable pieces which is what I'm assuming management wants to do. We would be in the same position we have been in, except John Wall would have veteran players around him. Now, we likely would have been too good to get Jan Vesely, but honestly we haven't even seen the guy play yet. I understand this is very speculative to say the least but we didn't get anything in return for either of these players, all we did was surround our prized #1 pick in a horrendous losing situation.
As for the few who stand by Ted Leonsis' rebuilding strategy and believe losing is best, the Thunder are an exception. The Mavericks, Lakers, and Celtics (Last 4 NBA champions) were largely built through free agency and trade. The draft is way too much of a guessing process to rely on. If we were going to trade Butler and Jamison, we could have at least gotten some sort of valuable piece in return.
This represents the view of the user who wrote the FanPost, and not the entire Bullets Forever community. We're a place of many opinions, not just one.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It wasn't a mistake trading them
It was time, but I do think we should’ve gotten more for them.
Formerly know as iNFamous SWaGG
by DMVLeGenD on Jan 5, 2012 3:41 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
We made the right moves then though like DMVLegend said, we could have tried to get more.
considering the situation we were in during 2009-2010, no way Gil could’ve been traded. We could have tried to void his deal after gungate, but we would likely have failed
Although having Butler and Antawn would have been great for Wall's development.
Had he been able to play with them for a season, I think he would be much further along right now, similar to how Rose was able to play with a veteran presence in Deng, Noah, Boozer. But this is all just hypothetical.
"Blake Griffin is the American Jan Vesely" - Jan Vesely
by PhenomenalSwag on Jan 5, 2012 4:08 PM EST up reply actions
but that is assuming that we won the draft lottery altogether.
it is certainly possible that the wizards may have improved over the last two months and got 30-32 wins and then we would have Cousins instead. But I do agree that if Wall had Jamison and/or Butler things would be easier for him.
you've got me thinking about scenarios where we could have kept them around for the rebuild
but despite the fact that things aren’t going well now, i think moving them was still the right thing to do.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jan 5, 2012 6:50 PM EST reply actions
None of those teams were built through FA
and all of the trades were based on the draft.
by Mr. E on Jan 6, 2012 4:15 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Yeah
but let’s not let facts get in the way of our pessimistic impatience.
Our awful situation might look worse if we had kept both of them. Proabably would have won a few more games but...
Imagine if our PG of the future was Eric Bledsoe instead of Wall. ಠ_ಠ
IT wasn't a mistake to trade them
It was a mistake to not trade the rest of the players from the gilbert era. Im a Falcons fan and when Vick left the Falcons totally cleaned house so there were no players coaches or GM’s left from the era thats what the Wizards should of done!!
by spanishfalcon on Jan 6, 2012 6:54 AM EST reply actions 1 recs

by 






















