Celtics Vs. Wizards Recap: Lack Of Composure Late Costs Washington In 100-94 Loss
Once again, the Washington Wizards fought hard, and once again, they were done in late by bad offense and a lack of composure in falling, 100-94, to the Boston Celtics. The Wizards allowed the Celtics to enforce their will on the game, and then Paul Pierce did the rest, holding off the Wizards' rally. Late-game selfishness once again cost the Wizards, with John Wall and Jordan Crawford taking some horrible shots and JaVale McGee curiously refusing to foul after the Celtics got the ball.
An optimist would say the Wizards fought hard, but Boston was short-handed without Ray Allen and Rajon Rondo. This game was for the taking. Instead, the Wizards fell to 2-14 on the year. Some more notes on the game:
- Pretty good beginning for JaVale McGee. The block on Avery Bradley was nice, but I rather enjoyed his hedge and recovery on the first Paul Pierce-Jermaine O'Neal pick and roll, as well as his screen to free Nick Young for his first jump shot. Give credit where it's due to Andray Blatche as well, who did a nice job hedging and recovering on Pierce as well.
- Too much of Nick Young shooting early. Obviously, he needs to get into a rhythm, but that can be accomplished without running the first five plays for him. The next few possessions were a bit better.
- John Wall hesitating hurt him in a couple side pick and rolls to the baseline. On the first one, he could have turned the corner, but was slow and instead missed a tough jumper. On the second one, he hesitated a little less, but that little hesitation was enough to allow the Celtics' help defender to sneak in and draw the charge. He was much more decisive later in the quarter, and it resulted in a couple really nice plays.
- You like McGee getting post position, but not drop-stepping to the baseline and instead shooting a wild hook is not how to capitalize at all.
- Blatche's dunk was nice, but he was also rotating well on defense and rebounding. Pretty good start for him.
- One of the big problems for the Wizards early was the game had little flow. There were a lot of early whistles for ticky-tack fouls, which hurts a team like the Wizards that gets so many points in transition and has a very limited half-court offense. That helped keep the Celtics in the game even though the Wizards were playing pretty well. Going against Boston's set defense every time is very tough. Credit the Celtics for getting back as well; they're one of the best in the league at that.
- Shelvin Mack was impressive again. Nice pick, Ernie. He doesn't make mistakes and defends all 94 feet, making him the perfect backup point guard.
- Very surprised to not see Trevor Booker get in until the very end of the first half. Kevin Seraphin played pretty well, all things considering, but it's still confusing to see Booker not in there when he's done such good things when he's played.
- The Wizards really struggled to guard the Celtics' curls. They're tough to guard, but teams do it, and the Wizards should have found a way too. There wasn't enough bumping the cutter, especially with Ray Allen. That hurt them midway through the second quarter.
- Lots of people were making a lot out of the Celtics having zero offensive rebounds midway through the second quarter, but at the same time, the Wizards had almost no fast-break points. These things are related. Hard to grab offensive rebounds when you have three guys dropping back on every possession.
- That also explains why the Wizards struggled in the second quarter. It's hard for a team like theirs to score against Boston's set defense. Basically, it's no major accomplishment that the Wizards held the Celtics to zero offensive rebounds. The Celtics prospered because they did it to themselves.
- Thank goodness for Wall in the second quarter. He did a nice job of understanding that he needed to carry the offense in the second quarter. Sometimes, being a point guard does mean dominating the ball when your teammates are struggling. The hope is the game becomes continuous so those guys can get easy opportunities later.
- Tempo really was the name of the game in that first half. The Celtics controlled it, and that's why they were up at halftime.
- Not sure why Wall rested for the final minute of the half. Probably could have used him on those possessions.
- The second half began pretty much the same way the first half ended. Boston controlled tempo and the Wizards' offense was useless against Boston's stifling half-court defense. The Wizards' defense needed to pressure Boston more to try to force turnovers, because they have no chance in a half-court game.
- Not a good game for Young today, but I don't think everything was his fault. He didn't get very good help from the Wizards' big men, which is a must when you play the Celtics. His offense was entirely on him though.
- Nice to see the Wizards get the ball to McGee in the post. The Celtics are notorious for never double-teaming, so there are opportunities to get easy baskets there if the Wizards use them.
- The Wizards have to shoulder some blame for the tempo of the game. Here's what I mean. With four and a half minutes left in the third quarter, Wall picked Avery Bradley's pocket. It was a really nice play and it was exactly what the Wizards need to do. But instead of taking advantage, three Wizards players -- Chris Singleton, Andray Blatche and JaVale McGee -- walked up the floor. With only one player running with him, Wall had to pull it back and run a half-court set, which resulted in a turnover.
- There were a few more fast breaks at the end of the third quarter, which was good. The Wizards' only chance to win is to speed up the game. Still, I think there were opportunities missed to pressure the Celtics for all 94 feet. With Avery Bradley and E'Twaun Moore in there, it's the perfect opportunity for Wall to be in their grill. He didn't do it consistently enough.
- Great job by Seraphin locking down Brandon Bass. His block on Bass was huge, as was his quick outlet to Wall that led to the Booker alley-oop. The Wizards still didn't pressure the ball enough, but they were more active in the half court, which helped allow them to get out and run. Nice to see them get right in their man's grill.
- When Saunders talks about Singleton's struggles defensively, he's talking about possessions like the one where Pierce went right around him easily on the baseline. Singleton has the tools to be a great defender but needs to stay more balanced in his stance.
- Speaking of those tools, two possession later, Singleton stayed down and used his length to contest a fadeaway, leading to the fast-break dunk by Young.
- Avery Bradley is nothing if not persistent.
- Pierce really is a tough cover. My first instinct was to say the Wizards should have guarded him like they guarded Durant (smaller guy, get into his legs), but Pierce is so strong that it's probably better to guard him with length. Except, that doesn't really work because Pierce can just get to his spot and find a way to get his shot off anyway. The one matchup I would have liked to see is Booker, but I understand the reluctance there because it's hard to score with him out there.
- The Wizards' spacing was horrendous on too many critical possessions late in the game. That's even with Crawford and Young playing on the wings. This is often the issue when Blatche and McGee play together late in games.
- Was that Wall on Pierce? Wow.
- Wall's death stare towards Blatche on the possession where Garnett dunked it to put the Celtics up five could have killed somebody.
- Lots of hero ball late, just like against the Nuggets. Eventually, this will be fixed, you'd think. You'd hope.
- Booker overhelped a bit on Garnett's jumper to put the Celtics up five. He got back just a bit too late and didn't put a hand up to contest the shot. That was just enough for Garnett. Every little bit counts. Booker's a pretty good clamp defender, but he was outsmarted off the ball late in the game.
- That last flailing attempt by Wall summed up a lot of the team's problems. Wall forced an awful shot, and McGee, instead of immediately fouling, hung his head and ran down court, forcing someone else to foul. So little composure by all involved there.
It's really tempting to be happy with the Wizards' effort, but this was a game they should have won. They let Boston enforce its will on the game and then made really bad decisions late.
78 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
when did we get our third win? or 16th loss for that matter?
by DavidDunn on Jan 22, 2012 3:51 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
You could have also specifically highlighted Flip’s decision to leave JaVale on the bench at the end of the 4th when Blatche was continually making sucktastic plays.
Didn't get to watch the past couple games
but ever since I saw the OKC game, they’ve been playing with passion. That’s all I can ask for from a team lacking elite talent but the guys on this team have been showing their skills recently. Prove people wrong Wiz kids! Let’s get that road dub tomorrow in Philly! knocking on wood
Follow me on Twitter: @adamvolo
Nice recap...I would have been interested to see what Vesely might have done against Pierce
Might have at least given him some trouble shooting over him.
Crawford and Young = 60 minutes
Vesely 2 minutes.
The Wiz are losing because the two worst players get 60+ minutes per night.
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Jan 22, 2012 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
Two worst?
They combined for 31 points and 12-24 shooting
by oakhillswag on Jan 22, 2012 4:21 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Facts be irrelevant, silly
It’s postgame Rant Time!
by disgrunted on Jan 22, 2012 4:22 PM EST up reply actions 7 recs
60 minutes 6 rbs 4 assists 5 TO
Young and Crawford have played well two nights in a row. Both losses. They can’t win when so many minutes generate so little production.
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Jan 22, 2012 4:41 PM EST up reply actions
So we should play Vesley at Shooting guard
is that what you’re suggesting? Or are you just trolling?
by rgc19 on Jan 22, 2012 4:55 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
agreed... terrible point
First off, Nick Young, and Crawford play the 2, and Vessley is a 4 who plays the 3 once in a while.So comparing the two make no sense. Also Nick Young and Crawford’s job is to shoot and score while playing defense. They did all of that tonight fairly well except Nick Young’s defense which wasn’t the best tonight. They did what they are supposed to do, and played fine, they aren’t the reason why we lost.
Nick Mason and Crawford played 62 minutes at the 2?
That doesn’t add up.
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Jan 22, 2012 4:57 PM EST up reply actions
You're right, it doesn't
But you’re still wrong about the other thing.
by rgc19 on Jan 22, 2012 4:58 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Nick played the 3 some tonight....
My point is that Vessley isn’t really a 3 he gets most of his minutes at the 4, so comparing him to NIck, Jordan, and Mason doesn’t really make sense to me.
by Wizkid4eva on Jan 22, 2012 5:06 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
This is true
But Vesely can play 3. So can Booker.
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Jan 22, 2012 5:12 PM EST up reply actions
Neither of them can score
if you lock them in a gym, though
by rgc19 on Jan 22, 2012 5:26 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
have you noticed
Nick and Crawford are shooting below 40% combined. Booker and Ves are both shooting over 50%. Who’s the better scorer?
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Jan 22, 2012 6:08 PM EST up reply actions
Are you really insinuating that Booker and Ves can score better than Nick Young and Crawford?
Thats like saying running back A, that has 3 carries for 15 yards is better than another back, B, that has 25 for 100 because running back A has a 5.0 ypc while B has a 4.0 ypc…. Lmaoo you don’t/cant/shouldn’t do that…
Jan averages 2pts/game, Booker 5pts
pretty clear who the better scorers are
Of course they score more
They take a ton of shots. They destroy possessions with bad shots turnovers and never create their own opportunities. They are a leech sucking all the blood out of the team. The Wiz would instantly improve with anybody else taking those 60 minutes, even a warm body from the NBDL (not Roger Mason tho).
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Jan 22, 2012 6:31 PM EST up reply actions
Jan(i have to assume) and Booker(it's been proven) arent yet capable of taking that many shots
as in they probably cant even get 15shots off. When they are open it’s because the other team tends to ignore them while keying in on our scorers.
I've beaten this to death already
But my basic point is, play anybody but the Terrible 2s. Improvement will be instantaneous.
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Jan 22, 2012 6:48 PM EST up reply actions
Not the time to make that point
All things considered, they played well today
I'm not going to think of something extra witty or clever to say, I don't want to convince you to see things my way, I just have 2 words for you: JEREMY LAMB
even if that person cant shoot or score
Or defend the perimeter. Wizards are 11 points better per 100 possessions with Nick on the floor defensively and they struggle to score without him. He was slumping to start the year but seems to have gotten going of late. Crawford is another story but if you think these two players are the same, you’re terribly mistaken. If you think we should play our two worst shooters at the 2, then you are terribly mistaken.
by rgc19 on Jan 22, 2012 8:05 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
If you're really interested in inane comparisons
Booker’s true shooting percentage is less than a percentage point better than Nick’s (.514 to .506) despite Nick’s slump and Booker’s inability to score on anything besides putbacks and oops. Despite Nick having a higher user rate, Book turns the ball over twice as much. So Nick is a more efficient per-possession scorer this year despite a drastic dip in TSP in a small sample.
by rgc19 on Jan 22, 2012 8:31 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Not very efficiently
They both prefer playing in the post so the floor would be too crowded. You need Nick at the 3 or Singleton or Rashard, because they are a threat to score and the defense has to respect them.Having Jan or Book on the wing doesn’t help.
by Wizkid4eva on Jan 22, 2012 5:46 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
i'd like to see more of singleton's little jumper in the lane
he’s hit a couple of those here and there…and they look under control
I guess an easier way to summarize this game is....
….to say that the Wizards often looked out of sync on offense and defense.
I still think they need to go into McGee more often so he can learn when to shoot and when to pass. The defense doesn’t respect the Wiz inside game, which is why Young is forced to shoot from 25 feet going backwards with two guys hanging all over him. Shaq, Barkley and crew have a few plays on the web for big men. We ought to run all of them every game.
We have to start somewhere with this team. They need to focus on a few simple plays in the half court. Over, and over, and over again until they gain some consistency and confidence. I’ve been watching them all year and I’m not sure what they are trying to do.
I wasnt paying attention early on
but def in the 2nd half Blatches D and recovery was silly bad. and i think we have 5 more close games like this before the Hero Ball starts to stop towards the end
Although the Wizards lost, it was a successful game
because McGee tried a layup when he had a breakaway instead of a fancy dunk. That’s what’s most important.
by disgrunted on Jan 22, 2012 4:24 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
i figured someone would comment on that
the celtic rookie closing on mcgee had a lot to do with that
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jan 22, 2012 4:51 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
He went up soft
and a little out of control. It was just a bad play all around, really.
by seewhite on Jan 22, 2012 5:16 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
it's tough when a big man is dribbling the ball with a little guy around
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jan 22, 2012 5:18 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
It's also tough when you're thinking "I probably shouldn't dunk this because people are going to cry about it"
You could see that look on his face as he was running towards the basket. Indecision is the worst.
by jakenbake on Jan 23, 2012 9:24 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Anyone notice
Did anyone notice in the 3rd and 4th quarters that Wizard ball handlers would pass a little too quickly after a pick and roll? It was almost like we panicked in certain situations.
And they never looked to the one setting the pick as well….
Interesting, but definitely something to work on with Philly coming up.
by Aquamaneastfish on Jan 22, 2012 4:33 PM EST reply actions
this game was poorly coached by Flip
Too many dumb subs and crazy match ups. Mcgee and Blatche are the only players capable of defending KG yet you saw Seraphin and Booker on him too often.
Offensively the Wizards waited a whole half before realizing Mcgee could score with ease on JO. truly low IQ by coaches and players there.
He did play really well
He banged that big country body of his around and got in everyone’s face. He had a nice block on on offensive foul call early in the game. I think he likes playing physical teams like the Celtics.
Disagree
“Not a good game for Young today, but I don’t think everything was his fault. He didn’t get very good help from the Wizards’ big men, which is a must when you play the Celtics. His offense was entirely on him though.”
Nick scored 19 points on 13 shots. You might not have liked it, but it was effective.
The bigger question is why Ves has only played roughly ten minutes the last two games. He grabbed a strong rebound and had two nice passes, Lewis converted one of them into a basket. He is our best PnR defender. Late in the game he could have been effective.
keep in mind
The notes are chronological, and while I try to go back and change ones that get affected by what happens later on, I often have to rush to get down to the locker room. Young’s offense was better later in the game.
by Mike Prada on Jan 22, 2012 5:15 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
There are two sides to the basketball game...
and although Nick may have been OK on Offense – this was by far his worst defensive game of the year…
He lost Ray Allen twice in the first quarter… and was torched over and over again by Pierce in the 2nd half… He wasn’t watching the ball, and it led to a lay up by Pierce as they passed the ball right past Nick’s head…
I’m a Nick Young fan – but seriously, he had a bad defensive game today
I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.
by Rook6980 on Jan 22, 2012 5:33 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I noticed that too...
…but I think it’s a bit of an overstatement because good defense implies teamwork. I never see much defensive teamwork or help with this team. Is there a defensive coach?
i want more vesely!
after wall hes got the most swag on the team
by BigPenisArenas on Jan 22, 2012 4:44 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Not even close... in terms of Swag its.
JW
Nick Young
Crawford
Booker-T
then McGee
everybody else is basically tied
by Wizkid4eva on Jan 22, 2012 4:49 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
really you think booker and javale have swag?
veselys understanding of the game and the world in general contribute to his swag
by BigPenisArenas on Jan 22, 2012 5:24 PM EST up reply actions
I guess your definition of swag and mine are completely different then.
Because IMO Jan doesn’t have swag on the court, he doesn’t play “mean” like a Booker, and he doesn’t reek of confidence like some of the other players
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrxaHI_rf8k
I’d say he got swag…
The biggest issue with the team is the lack of production from the SF spot
We only have 2 exclusive SFs, Rashard and Chris, they combined for 4 points, 3 assists, and a baffling 1 rebound in 36 combined minutes. No other position collectively played even close to that bad. That is our biggest weakness, our lack of scoring from our small forwards and though they can hit some 3s, they don’t shoot the 3 effectively.
The next step in our rebuilding process is to find a legit SF. I was going to make an argument for Kawhi Leonard in the last draft at 6, but when you look at the numbers, he and Chris are almost identical, except Kawhi scores 2.5 points more (because he shoots about 3 more shots than Chris), and grabs 2.1 rebounds more. And I think their defense is basically a push. So that argument is baseless.
However we still need a SF that can shoot the 3, rebound some and, play defense. An Andre Igoudala type, or even a Trevor Ariza type. If we can draft Harrison Barnes in the draft or even Quincy Miller from Baylor I think that will help the team a lot, and move us closer to contending for a respectable playoff spot. The SF spot is a bigger need than Power forward and shooting guard, although finding a good veteran PF, like a David West type in free agency is the second on my list. i think Nick Young and J Craw are viable long-term options at the SG spot. And of course point guard is set, and center would be set if we extend McGee.
As for this season i think keeping the three guard lineup with Nick at the 3, and Crawford at the 2 gives us the best chance to win (like Mike Shanahan would say)
When i read this.....then i read your screen name.......
I'm not going to think of something extra witty or clever to say, I don't want to convince you to see things my way, I just have 2 words for you: JEREMY LAMB
by qthaballa on Jan 22, 2012 7:29 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Harrison Barnes doesnt rebound well (not poorly) but def not well
and his D sucks cuz he is not laterally quick, and he is a rock on offense, just a sharpshooter. Barnes will space the floor tho and bring bball IQ.
Well he is averaging 4.8 boards, this year and averaged 5.8 last year.
We don’t need him to get like 10 boards a night, 5-7 boards would be fine. And i think his scoring ability outweighs his defense. He would fill a huge scoring need for us.
Besides I don’t really like anyone else in the draft. Anthony Davis is a beast but reminds me too much of McGee, we don’t need two of them. I wouldn’t be mad if we drafted him though. Andre Drummond has not been impressive at all, he has no post game and only dunks. He isn’t dominant in college and is nowhere near as productive as Greg Oden, or even Brooks Lopez was coming out. Jeremy Lamb is a nice player, but i think SF is just the biggest need.
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist would also be really nice...
But he isn’t a sharpshooter like Barnes, although he is more athletic, plays better defense, and rebounds much better. Idk either one would be great.
Barnes has improved his handle this season
He’s never going to be a guy that’s going to dance around with ball and cross people up to get to the rim. Rather, he’s going to be a guy that uses his craftiness moreso than tight handles and first step a la Paul Pierce.
But his handle looks better this season. He no longer dribbles upright and dribbles low to the ground. And he does a better job protecting the ball and keeps it at the side of his waist, instead of the front of his body. He’s not just a spot-up shooter.
And he’ll be a solid defender in the NBA. He’s a better Luol Deng to me.
Formerly know as iNFamous SWaGG
i agree that he'll he a fine rebounder and good defender
and he’s just so smooth on offense that i cant resist. his shot is 100% silk.
by BigPenisArenas on Jan 22, 2012 5:28 PM EST up reply actions
I agree with everything you said except..
I don’t think he’ll defend that well, so he doesn’t compare to Deng in that way because Deng is a lock down defender. Either way I think he’ll help the wizards tremendously
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist has a lions heart
MKG is a beast, if he and Wall “clicked’ they could will their team to win. I dont believe Barnes has that type of spirit. Ive watched every Ky game this year and MKG reminds me of John Wall, just longer. In one game this year he had 19 rebounds, how much heart does it take for a 6’7” guy to get 19 rebounds?
by road_warri0r on Jan 23, 2012 2:32 AM EST up reply actions
In my lifetime as a fan of pretty much sucky teams
In my lifetime as a fan of pretty much sucky teams, I have probably never disliked someone as much as Blatche.
He is a *!.
Formerly know as iNFamous SWaGG
operation trade blatche to boston got off to a great start in the first half
he looked pumped up and inspired. unfortunately it crashed and burned in the second. his lack of help defense in the fourth quarter was… well, this:
Wall’s death stare towards Blatche on the possession where Garnett dunked it to put the Celtics up five could have killed somebody
wall of late is looking like a budding star. HIS help defense has been terrific lately.
boston is pretty awful right now, they just outsmarted us. to chew up time in the first half they repeatedly ran the same play for pierce for like 5 minutes straight, lol.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jan 22, 2012 5:03 PM EST reply actions
I agree with you about Blatche
he seems to be playing more within himself lately. He hasn’t been shooting, but that has been a bit of a good thing. Maybe he’s more of a Lamar Odom type, who just isn’t the focus of an offense. I know, I’m dreaming right now, but it’s a thought.
I was focused on Dray and Flip that play
I missed the death stare :(
I'm not going to think of something extra witty or clever to say, I don't want to convince you to see things my way, I just have 2 words for you: JEREMY LAMB
A pretty fun game though
we were in it all the way through, and we looked a little bit inspired at times. And it is confirmed that the Celtics are horrible. They looked really old and slow out there. I know they played without Rondo, but they still play like dinosaurs.
Really was impressed by Seraphin
He’s been making strides.
Part of Pech's Posse since 2007.
by OleksiyPecherovsHomeboy on Jan 22, 2012 6:41 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Same deal all year
Thats why when people claim we should cut ties I just dont understand it (not to mention his age and only his 2nd year). Especially watching what he was able to do over summer.
He can be a vital piece and I’d like to see him more involved in the offense because he has the tools to a post threat when one is needed (aside from JaVale, I can’t recall anyone else scoring in the post in the half court)
I'm not going to think of something extra witty or clever to say, I don't want to convince you to see things my way, I just have 2 words for you: JEREMY LAMB
by qthaballa on Jan 22, 2012 7:34 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I like Singleton
a lot actually…. but has anyone else noticed that he is bad at defense? I understand struggling with Pierce, Durant, Melo, etc, but, he couldn’t even stay in front of Galo the other night against Denver….
I think he isn't ready to start yet
As much as I wanted him to start over Lewis, there is no way around it: the kid isn’t ready yet.
He is the best defensive player in this draft by far, we saw some flashes of that earlier in the season but going up against the best of the best just makes him look silly. He also has no breath left to be that high energy disruptive force off the ball.
Let him play a good 20 minutes against second tier players, he ain’t ready yet.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Jan 23, 2012 5:17 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs

by 

























