2011 NBA Draft: Welcome To The Crucible, Where Contenders Are Forged
No blade is ready for battle before it's tempered, and there's been so little competition while the team clears the old guard out that the word 'entitlement' has crept in when discussing our youth. No more, the 2011 NBA Draft begins the John Wall era in earnest. Say hello to 'The Crucible.' How does it feel to be playing with a full deck, Wizards fans? If the team brings back everyone they're aiming to bring back, they're two deep or more at every position!
And what does that mean? With the selections of Jan Vesely, Chris Singleton and Shelvin Mack, these are all young guys, hungry and high-character. Tough, athletic players who attended the Gilbert Arenas correspondence school of swag. Let's break it down by position.
PG: Never fear, John Wall gets his minutes. But we'd rather he got his rest as well. Time to reassess, catch his breath, return in attack and facilitate mode. The battle here is between Mack and Jordan Crawford, which seems kind of silly when one is a ball-dominant SG and the other is an off-ball PG. But with Nick Young ensconced at SG, here we are.
SG: This is Nick Young's job to lose. With both JC and NY being streaky shooters, the simple question of whose defense is more effective on a particular day may swing the needle one way or la otra. Nick's man defense is superior, while Jordan's energy defense seems to make up for his shortcomings in this department. And Othyus Jeffers to boot? I'm in heaven.
SF: Wasn't this a crucial FA need yesterday morning? No matter. With Vesely, Singleton, and Trevor Booker all looking for minutes here (with Larry Owens out to get his own spot), I realize it never occurred to me when I asked whether we were re-signing Josh Howard, Maurice Evans or Cartier Martin that the answer could be 'none of the above.'
PF: With a sudden logjam at SF, last year's fan favorite Trevor Booker is going to push that much harder for playing time. With Rashard Lewis coming off knee surgery and embattled Andray Blatche looking to rehabilitate his image with a heavy dose of 'basketball-first', here's another battle of the young and hungry to keep an eye on.
C: Competition seems lightest here. Javale McGee has come through the nightmare valley of trade rumors looking fairly bulletproof, and Hamady N'Diaye is still lightyears away. The dark horse here is Kevin Seraphin, and yes, he's at Center because he plays like one, even if he is undersized. Last year's Bismack Biyombo showed up out of shape and suffered the consequences all year, expect to see much more out of him.
There are some fairly major caveats here. Young has to come back. Blatche and Seraphin must show up cut and ready to bang. If they do? Smells like team spirit, come as we want you to be.
You will bring about the destruction of the [Miami] war machine, the elimination of [front-runner] tyranny over the oppressed [fans] of [small-market teams], and security for [the integrity of basketball] in a free world. Your task will not be an easy one. Your enemy [has endorsements for his underwear], [an entourage], and [always plays on network television]. He will [flop] savagely....the [Washington Wizards] are marching together to victory. I have full confidence in your [swag], devotion to [defense], and [numbness of your facial regions]. We will accept nothing less than [Finals champion]. Good luck, and let us all beseech the blessings of [David Stern] upon this great and noble undertaking.
You all know I can't resist theatrics anymore than an agility-challenged child can resist a piece of cake. But I suspect most of you are feeling the same way. We watched Ernie Grunfeld pick the guys we're counting on to put their hands on the frame and pry open a championship window. It's an agonized hope and belief because it really could happen in our lifetime. While using a word like lifetime sounds melodramatic at first, think about it for a second, then maybe it doesn't sound quite so crazy.
What is certain is that we'll have to plow our way through the top heavy Eastern Conference and Western Conference Champion to reach the promised land. The funny thing is that we're getting ready to believe we are ready to climb that mountain, which means we leave the protected fan reserve of the perennial loser. To translate loosely, Bullets fans: sharpen your trash talk and put on your thick skin; relevance, here we come.
105 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great post
Always enjoy your stuff. Going back to the age old question..maybe starting Crawford would be a better fit?what’s y’all take
by believe_the_curse on Jun 24, 2011 11:11 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
You think that’s what will happen or what should happen?
by believe_the_curse on Jun 24, 2011 11:15 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You think that’s what will happen or what should happen?
by believe_the_curse on Jun 24, 2011 11:16 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Yes haha
One is what he hopes the wiz do and one is what he thinks they will do
by believe_the_curse on Jun 24, 2011 1:07 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I think Crawford is more valuable coming off the bench
by imperialme on Jun 24, 2011 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
agreed
JC is better right now running the second unit..allows him to have the ball in his hands and do the things that he does best…once he learns to play without being ball dominate maybe he can be considered a starter
What's this hell I view?
Wizards are like the winter
Ice cold from outside
-wjb1492
Plus, Nick's a better three point shooter, which should help our spacing
If we start Singleton or Vesely over Shart, we’ll be lacking a legit three point threat at 4 positions. Crawford technically takes a lot of threes, but they don’t seem to go in.
Follow me on twitter -
http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
by pantslessyoda1 on Jun 24, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
He still does
People tend to underestimate how much a bad wheel affects your shooting.
Whoah, now
We’re still the Bullets. Let’s not put the cart before the horse. Relevance is asking a lot of this team. :)
Yeah
I’ve got my eye on Nick Young :)
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 24, 2011 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
We should sign a big man
Unless this Seraphin guy is what he is supposed to be. Because right now all i am willing to expect is another frenchman that eats too much bread, like the one we got last year.
Ohhh my God.
Where is my FACE? I CANT FEEL MY FACE!!!
by returnofswagger on Jun 24, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Well shooters are cheaper.
WAAAYYYY cheaper. And WAAAAYYYY easier to find.
Yeah but right now our most solid rebounder is probably Andray Blatche...
[barf]
Ohhh my God.
Where is my FACE? I CANT FEEL MY FACE!!!
by returnofswagger on Jun 24, 2011 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Yon Wizard has a lean and hungry look....
Beware the ides of March Lebronius.
Every sportswriter
I have look so far seem to rate the Wizards’ draft as a great draft;however, this writer has different opinion. Check it out
http://www.ology.com/sports/winners-and-losers-2011-nba-draft
Whoever that is, he is an idiot.
by rayallenisaballer on Jun 24, 2011 12:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Always nice to read an opposing opinion.
Now back to gloating.
by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
It was worth reading just for this:
2001: Kwame Brown (murdered by Michael Jordan)
he's mostly trying to be funny
but i think he has a point
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 24, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
gallows humor...but i did laugh at this
What did Washington receive for all those trades? A pile of sh*t, that’s what.
Well the writer is correct about past drafts
That is the scariest thought.
by DavidDunn on Jun 24, 2011 12:51 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
No he isn't.
He doesn’t factor in draft-day trades.
or when those picks were taken
We got Blatche in the 2nd round.. As a second round pick, he’s a great pick-up. We got Blake in the 2nd round.
Not the point
I don’t think anyone is going to argue that we have a stellar draft record this decade. We can pick and choose the anomalies.
Let’s hope we have started this decade the opposite way.
by DavidDunn on Jun 24, 2011 2:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It is the point.
He’s factually incorrect. Unless that wasn’t the point? Wait I’m confused. Nevermind.
None of those drafts (aside from Kwame) was close to being as bad as he paints them. Half of them were good draft day hauls. So that means he’s actually not correct. That was the point wasn’t it?
‘06 was the only terrible draft. Half of those guys we didn’t even choose because we sold the pick. The other poor ones were 10 years ago. Mcgee, Young, Blatche would all go wayyyy higher if those drafts were re-done. Blake, even DMac have lasted years on NBA rosters as 2nd round picks, that is more than expected from the 2nd round.
And we turned Veremeenko (and some cap space) into
Wait for it…. Seraphin, Singleton, and Crawford.
by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 3:53 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Y'know
Until you posted that, I hadn’t made that jump yet…delicious.
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 25, 2011 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Gotta disagree on one thing
Jordan Crawford is not in Nick Young’s country code, let alone area code, when it comes to shooting the basketball. Nick is one of the purest shooters in the NBA. Crawford shot .258 from behind the arc. They have radically different games, which fits the roster well. Nick Young is a shooter who can come off screens and hit open shots. He can play really good D. He can go one-on-one but that is not his forte. Crawford is more instant offense. He scores with the ball in his hands (not necessary for Young) and has the tools for defense, just needs to get better at the fundamentals.
These differences in traits led to different roles. Nick Young is the starting two guard; the guy who spaces the floor, checks the best guard on the other team, and knocks down open shots off of screens and kick outs. Jordan Crawford is instant offense. He can score a lot and play make a bit. When the offense slows down, you bring him in. The prototypical sixth man.
by zeke5123 on Jun 24, 2011 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I don't disagree on any of those points
I think until the hierarchy is established, the competition is open. JC and NY are different kinds of streaky…but wouldn’t you agree that they ARE streaky?
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 24, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, but Young is more on that off. And he's reduced the # of bad shots he takes.
Can’t yet say the same about Crawford. But he has time…
Agreed, it's definitely his job to lose
Be interesting to see how Nick and Jordan play together…
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 24, 2011 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I sitll expect the Wizards to suck next year...
… but there’s at least hope and almost every player can reasonable be expected to do better than last year be it due to age, lack of injury, etc…
Remaining concerns:
Defense – as in its still pretty suspect. Singleton helps, but I don’t expect him to get big minutes
Shooting – Wall and Crawford were poor shooters. Young is decent, so more minutes from him is a good thing. But none of the draft picks are big scorers and the team lacks much scoring punch
Lack of bona fide NBA starters – Wall is one. I’d say Nick Young is a least respectable. The others have potential, but it’s more what might be that what is.
The defense is only suspect at the center position
Granted that’s the most important defensive position, but you’re talking Wall, Young, Jeffers, Booker, Singleton, and Seraphin (eventually). And maybe one day even H, if he pans out. That’s a lot of defense.
Interior defense at the center position is the hardest thing to get, and it was just plain to costly to acquire in this year’s draft (and its always a very expensive commodity on the FA market). On that note, am I the only one checking out the 2012 draft class already? LOL that’s sad.
If we had taken Morris at 6,
Then Singleton would have gone to Houston at 14.
And then we're right back at square one with Motiejunas at 18.
Of course I’m speculating. But that’s the nature of dominoes…
True or False
Ernie used our top pick on an unskilled, euroleague role player based on his athleticism.
False
He has a ton of skills. There’s more to basketball than dribbling and shooting (yes, I know that sounds ridiculous, but I mean it).
by Scizzy on Jun 24, 2011 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
I expect this is going to be posted soon
but it really made me a believer in Vesely, especially his defense and as a role player within the offense. Pruiti knows his stuff and I trust his evaluation.
http://nbaplaybook.com/2011/06/24/overseas-scouting-report-jan-vesely/
by Scizzy on Jun 24, 2011 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Thanks for the link
There’s some good footage there. Interesting assessment.
by satchmore on Jun 24, 2011 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
This statement has be puzzled
The Wiz were a bad defensive team by any measure you could apply last year. I’m not sure why you would imply they are set on defense at 4 positions when they were among the worst teams in the league in defense last year. I admit there were individual games where specific guys played great, I watched Blatche seemingly frustrate Dirk and NY put up good contract year performances, but night in and night out they were just plain bad.
I'm taking the long view
All of our potentially good defenders (Wall, Young, Jeffers, Booker, McGee, and Seraphin) are EXTREMELY young, with the exception of Nick, who is entering his prime. We added an elite defender, another good defender, and a hard working (if limited) defender in this draft.
I’m not saying we’ll be Bostonian good next year. But Miami’esque in a couple years is not out of the question.
Wall - as a shot creator for the garbage points players.
And we added Singleton, who is the ideal 3&D guy.
Washington
Averaged about 97 points a game last season. I think that number will jump up to 100 (assuming Nick is resigned, I think it’ll be 98 if he’s not). Here’s how I’d break the points down.
Wall 18
Nick Young 18
Blatche 17
Crawford 15
McGee 12
Lewis 11
I think the rest of the points will come from some combination of Booker, Seraphin, Singleton, Vessely and the rest of the bench.
That's like 110 points
Craw will be more like 11, Booker 7 or 8, singleton 7 or 8, vesely 5-10 depending on PT. Of course you can’t just add them all up due to injuries and such but I agree with the basic premise that scoring shouldn’t be that difficult.
I have always been a needs person over BPA
But I think a big part of Big E’s strategy is to copy the Celtics/Garnett/Allen blueprint. In this current phase, we are stockpiling assets. It doesn’t really matter how much they fit in with the team concept, as much as how desirable they could be to other teams. At the same time, you are getting hard workers and winners. Could Seraphin, Booker, Vesely, Mack, Crawford, McGee and Dre all be as tradeable as Jeff Green and Delonte West? Yes.
I'll be writing something about this in a week or two :)
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 24, 2011 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Occurred to me too.
I think that part of the strategy is at least another year off though. They’ll probably let things play out and reassess going into the 2012 draft. (with the possible exception of Dray).
I like that idea
In order to be a contender, you need a superstar. We have wall who can become one someday but if we have these great pieces, we can trade for a great player like the celtics did but still have key role players.
by nhlnflnba18414 on Jun 24, 2011 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow, was looking up what it took to get Garnett and Allen
Boston sent the Minnesota Timberwolves forwards Al Jefferson, Ryan Gomes and Gerald Green, guard Sebastian Telfair and center Theo Ratliff, two first-round draft picks and cash considerations. Besides Ratliff, 34, the other four are 24 or younger.
The Boston Celtics acquired guard Ray Allen from the Seattle Supersonics on Thursday night for Delonte West, Wally Szczerbiak and the rights to the 2007 NBA Draft’s No. 5 overall pick — Georgetown forward Jeff Green. Boston also gets the rights to the Sonics’ 35th pick — LSU’s Glen Davis.
That’s a helluva lot of picks!
This is why it would have been very difficult for Ernie to trade our 2012 pick (even if restricted) to Utah in a package for Kanter. Trading future picks severely restricts a team’s flexibility to make trades. For those of us who think we should have considered using our pick to trade up, you have to consider that we just don’t know how good Kanter will be. You only trade future picks for all-star caliber players, imo.
by Tbonebullets on Jun 24, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Equivalents for us
Mcgee(Al), Booker (Gomes), Mack (Telfair), Neck(Ratliff/filler), Craw(Green), 2 firsts, cash
for D Howard
Blatche(Wally), Jan(green), Seraphin (Delonte)
for Melo
Wall
Young
Melo/Singleton
Shard
Howard/NDiaye
Find a Haslem clone, a shooter, and a vet backup PG in FA and that team could challenge Miami and Boston for supremacy.
Kevin McHale?
He can’t be ignored as a big part of the trade. I doubt many other GMs would have approved.
by Emmet O'Neal on Jun 24, 2011 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Vesely a PF? Who's backup C?
How come Vesely isn’t a PF and Lewis a SF?
Also, can anybody on the roster besides Kevin play minutes at C? JaVale can’t stay out of foul trouble long enough to be relied on form more than 24-30 minutes.
It’d really free up our lineups if Vesely or Andre could play C now and then without getting obliterated.
P.S. I hope Seraphim makes my question look retarded next year
Dray can play C.
They also have the length to go small (or more accurately, tall and skinny) for a 5-10 minutes a game.
Great read BNE.
Now I’m extra pumped to see the new look Wiz on the court.
New unis, new court, new young players…Can the season start already?
(Hopefully the new CBA gets done before the season starts.)
"McGee is running the transition? I'll stop him..." - James Jones
You gotta look at it as If Nick Young is GOOOOne.
We can all think that Ernie is going to match an offer for Nick.
5 years at $8million per?
5 years at $10million per?
Will Nick still be a Wizard?
I think Jordan Crawford will be the starting Shooting Guard on Opening Day.
Nick will be on the West Coast where I know he is dying to be.
No way Nick gets those numbers
and especially not with the CBA uncertainty.
There are not many teams with the combination of capspace and need
by Emmet O'Neal on Jun 24, 2011 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions
teams with 8m+ cap space before draft
NJN, TOR, DET, IND,CHA,WAS,HOU,MEM,DEN,MIN,OC,GSW,LAC,PHO & SAC
I think everyone has some SG atm and half of in rebuild mode anyway.
I'm thinking we'll re-sign him to something like 4 years, $32 million
Not Ted’s M.O. to let him go
by Max Zamphirescu on Jun 26, 2011 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions
30M deals will be past in NEW CBA
I think 4years, 20 mil or less will be more realistic
I think Blatche should play more C this year
Finding a C that can rebound a little in FA would also help. Someone better than Oberto/Hilton. Troy Murphy, Pryz, Oden?
No thanks.
If you want a vet big, get him for tutoring purposes. Our cap space is not worth a marginal veteran big man for production purposes at this point.
Much better to try and get that in the draft, or cash in some of our glut of assets next offseason when teams are looking to dump salary because the new CBA is squeezing them harder than the Mob.
Cap space?
We aren’t chasing big fish this year and it’d be a 1 year deal. That does not affect the cap at all. I don’t want to see Seraphin as the only C backup, sorry.
Apology accepted :-]
What kind of money are you talking here? Because off the bat, you’re not getting ANY worthwhile big on a one year deal. You’ll simply be outbid. You’re getting a tutor (or if you’re a contender you’re getting an extremely limited contributor – think Juwan Howard). You’re getting Oberto v2.
Anyway, when you’re talking about buying real, quantifiable big man rebounding production, you’re talking about paying $10-12M over three years at the very least.
My bad, I assumed you knew how expensive big men were.
That's why everybody reaches for them in the draft.
If they were acquirable, then there’s no reason for EG to draft 5 of them in 2 years and park them on the roster until they get good or get used as trade bait. And there’s also no reason for EG to keep Blatche.
What??
The following sentence is entirely accurate.
If they were acquirable, then there’s no reason for EG to draft 5 of them in 2 years and park them on the roster until they get good or get used as trade bait.
Then in the next sentence you say there is no reason to keep Blatche, who is a 24 year old big man top 20 in the NBA in rebounds. Blatche is also easily one of the cheapest of the top 20 rebounders (for players not on their rookie contracts).
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 24, 2011 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions
No you mis read me.
It should read like this: “If good were easily acquirable, then there’s no good reason for EG to keep Blatche.”
The point I was trying to make is that if it was easy or cheap to replace Blatche’s production, then he’d be long gone already.
OK let's try again:
“If good big men were easily acquirable, then there’s no good reason for EG to keep Blatche."
Well
I think this was really jones-y’s point:
Our cap space is not worth a marginal veteran big man for production purposes at this point.And when you’re talking about
real, quantifiable big man rebounding production, you’re talking about paying $10-12M over three yearsThose guys don’t really come to mind. Murphy is a stretch 4, Oden spends more time in a suit than Donald Trump, and not much in Pryzbilla’s only spared that comparison because he played with Greg Oden
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 25, 2011 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah
I just don’t think cap space matters cause I wasn’t talking about someone like Gasol. I brought up murphy because he’s a good bet to only get 1 year and can rebound. I guess if we take on an expiring deal that opens up more options but really there aren’t many FAs who fit our need of a decent backup 5
Agreed
And guys like Murphy want a one year deal on a contender only, not interested in playing nursemaid and losing starting jobs to young guns
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 25, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed on taking on the expiring (or 2-yrs-left) contract of a decent big man.
That’s a good strategy (cap-wise and roster wise), and that just may be very available if there are any significant changes to the CBA.
You’d get production and a tutor, and you’d get cap space back (or a potential trade chip) at the end of the deal.
And you'd get either a pick or a prospect in the trade...
That’s the price for taking the contract off their hands.
And just to illustrate how valuable cap space can be,
Last offseason, people wanted to use our cap space on a decent big man to split time with Dray and Javale. “We’re going to get killed inside.” And they were right, we got KILLED inside.
However… without the cap space to take on Kirk Hinrich’s $9m contract, we don’t get Kevin Seraphin, Jordan Crawford, or Chris Singleton (we got the latter two for turning around and trading Kirk Hinrich’s talent to Atlanta). We’re nowhere near as high on this team (Wall notwithstanding) without those three prospects.
It is ESSENTIAL to this rebuild to use our cap space very wisely. Essential. The way see it, its not that trades, FA signings, and the draft are three separate tools used for roster-building. Its that they are the three interwoven, inseparable elements of roster-building.
I worry about rebounding
If someone can trick McGee into thinking chicks love rebounding I’m good
8 boards in 27 mpg isn’t bad at all. If he’s playing 33, that is close to 10 rpg. Singleton should be an improvement from Thornton there. Just keep Blatche away from those sugary cocktails and we might be ok.
And he got better after the all-star break (or more accurately, after his triple double)
Anybody got those numbers?
I remember those
It was very up and down though. I just hope for something consistant. Each game was like 8, 5, 9, 17!!!, 3, 5 and etc. I hope for 10rpg

by 























