Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

2011 NBA Draft: Welcome To The Crucible, Where Contenders Are Forged

No blade is ready for battle before it's tempered, and there's been so little competition while the team clears the old guard out that the word 'entitlement' has crept in when discussing our youth.  No more, the 2011 NBA Draft begins the John Wall era in earnest.  Say hello to 'The Crucible.'  How does it feel to be playing with a full deck, Wizards fans?  If the team brings back everyone they're aiming to bring back, they're two deep or more at every position! 

And what does that mean?  With the selections of Jan Vesely, Chris Singleton and Shelvin Mack, these are all young guys, hungry and high-character.  Tough, athletic players who attended the Gilbert Arenas correspondence school of swag.  Let's break it down by position.

Star-divide

PG: Never fear, John Wall gets his minutes.  But we'd rather he got his rest as well.  Time to reassess, catch his breath, return in attack and facilitate mode.  The battle here is between Mack and Jordan Crawford, which seems kind of silly when one is a ball-dominant SG and the other is an off-ball PG.  But with Nick Young ensconced at SG, here we are.

 

SG: This is Nick Young's job to lose.  With both JC and NY being streaky shooters, the simple question of whose defense is more effective on a particular day may swing the needle one way or la otra.  Nick's man defense is superior, while Jordan's energy defense seems to make up for his shortcomings in this department.  And Othyus Jeffers to boot?  I'm in heaven.

SF:  Wasn't this a crucial FA need yesterday morning?  No matter.  With Vesely, Singleton, and Trevor Booker all looking for minutes here (with Larry Owens out to get his own spot), I realize it never occurred to me when I asked whether we were re-signing Josh Howard, Maurice Evans or Cartier Martin that the answer could be 'none of the above.'

PF: With a sudden logjam at SF, last year's fan favorite Trevor Booker is going to push that much harder for playing time.  With Rashard Lewis coming off knee surgery and embattled Andray Blatche looking to rehabilitate his image with a heavy dose of 'basketball-first', here's another battle of the young and hungry to keep an eye on.

C: Competition seems lightest here.  Javale McGee has come through the nightmare valley of trade rumors looking fairly bulletproof, and Hamady N'Diaye is still lightyears away.  The dark horse here is Kevin Seraphin, and yes, he's at Center because he plays like one, even if he is undersized.  Last year's Bismack Biyombo showed up out of shape and suffered the consequences all year, expect to see much more out of him.

There are some fairly major caveats here.  Young has to come back.  Blatche and Seraphin must show up cut and ready to bang.  If they do?  Smells like team spirit, come as we want you to be.

You will bring about the destruction of the [Miami] war machine, the elimination of [front-runner] tyranny over the oppressed [fans] of [small-market teams], and security for [the integrity of basketball] in a free world. Your task will not be an easy one. Your enemy [has endorsements for his underwear], [an entourage], and [always plays on network television]. He will [flop] savagely....the [Washington Wizards] are marching together to victory. I have full confidence in your [swag], devotion to [defense], and [numbness of your facial regions]. We will accept nothing less than [Finals champion]. Good luck, and let us all beseech the blessings of [David Stern] upon this great and noble undertaking.

You all know I can't resist theatrics anymore than an agility-challenged child can resist a piece of cake.  But I suspect most of you are feeling the same way.  We watched Ernie Grunfeld pick the guys we're counting on to put their hands on the frame and pry open a championship window.  It's an agonized hope and belief because it really could happen in our lifetime.  While using a word like lifetime sounds melodramatic at first, think about it for a second, then maybe it doesn't sound quite so crazy.

What is certain is that we'll have to plow our way through the top heavy Eastern Conference and Western Conference Champion to reach the promised land.  The funny thing is that we're getting ready to believe we are ready to climb that mountain, which means we leave the protected fan reserve of the perennial loser.  To translate loosely, Bullets fans: sharpen your trash talk and put on your thick skin; relevance, here we come.

Comment 105 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great post

Always enjoy your stuff. Going back to the age old question..maybe starting Crawford would be a better fit?what’s y’all take

by believe_the_curse on Jun 24, 2011 11:11 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

You think that’s what will happen or what should happen?

by believe_the_curse on Jun 24, 2011 11:15 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

You think that’s what will happen or what should happen?

by believe_the_curse on Jun 24, 2011 11:16 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yes haha

One is what he hopes the wiz do and one is what he thinks they will do

by believe_the_curse on Jun 24, 2011 1:07 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

agreed

JC is better right now running the second unit..allows him to have the ball in his hands and do the things that he does best…once he learns to play without being ball dominate maybe he can be considered a starter

What's this hell I view?
Wizards are like the winter
Ice cold from outside
-wjb1492

by pwilson319 on Jun 24, 2011 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plus, Nick's a better three point shooter, which should help our spacing

If we start Singleton or Vesely over Shart, we’ll be lacking a legit three point threat at 4 positions. Crawford technically takes a lot of threes, but they don’t seem to go in.

by pantslessyoda1 on Jun 24, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whoah, now

We’re still the Bullets. Let’s not put the cart before the horse. Relevance is asking a lot of this team. :)

by imperialme on Jun 24, 2011 11:12 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah

I’ve got my eye on Nick Young :)

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 24, 2011 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

We should sign a big man

Unless this Seraphin guy is what he is supposed to be. Because right now all i am willing to expect is another frenchman that eats too much bread, like the one we got last year.

Ohhh my God.

Where is my FACE? I CANT FEEL MY FACE!!!

by returnofswagger on Jun 24, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Well shooters are cheaper.

WAAAYYYY cheaper. And WAAAAYYYY easier to find.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah well

Identify a better FA. And prepare for sticker shock.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 3:50 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Every sportswriter

I have look so far seem to rate the Wizards’ draft as a great draft;however, this writer has different opinion. Check it out

http://www.ology.com/sports/winners-and-losers-2011-nba-draft

by MitchieMit on Jun 24, 2011 11:59 AM EDT reply actions  

gallows humor...but i did laugh at this
What did Washington receive for all those trades? A pile of sh*t, that’s what.

by DCrez on Jun 24, 2011 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

No he isn't.

He doesn’t factor in draft-day trades.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

or when those picks were taken

We got Blatche in the 2nd round.. As a second round pick, he’s a great pick-up. We got Blake in the 2nd round.

by GJennings on Jun 24, 2011 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not the point

I don’t think anyone is going to argue that we have a stellar draft record this decade. We can pick and choose the anomalies.

Let’s hope we have started this decade the opposite way.

by DavidDunn on Jun 24, 2011 2:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

It is the point.

He’s factually incorrect. Unless that wasn’t the point? Wait I’m confused. Nevermind.

None of those drafts (aside from Kwame) was close to being as bad as he paints them. Half of them were good draft day hauls. So that means he’s actually not correct. That was the point wasn’t it?

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

‘06 was the only terrible draft. Half of those guys we didn’t even choose because we sold the pick. The other poor ones were 10 years ago. Mcgee, Young, Blatche would all go wayyyy higher if those drafts were re-done. Blake, even DMac have lasted years on NBA rosters as 2nd round picks, that is more than expected from the 2nd round.

by Mr. E on Jun 24, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

And we turned Veremeenko (and some cap space) into

Wait for it…. Seraphin, Singleton, and Crawford.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 3:53 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Y'know

Until you posted that, I hadn’t made that jump yet…delicious.

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 25, 2011 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Heh

Write that article, Nation…

by jones-y on Jun 25, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gotta disagree on one thing

Jordan Crawford is not in Nick Young’s country code, let alone area code, when it comes to shooting the basketball. Nick is one of the purest shooters in the NBA. Crawford shot .258 from behind the arc. They have radically different games, which fits the roster well. Nick Young is a shooter who can come off screens and hit open shots. He can play really good D. He can go one-on-one but that is not his forte. Crawford is more instant offense. He scores with the ball in his hands (not necessary for Young) and has the tools for defense, just needs to get better at the fundamentals.

These differences in traits led to different roles. Nick Young is the starting two guard; the guy who spaces the floor, checks the best guard on the other team, and knocks down open shots off of screens and kick outs. Jordan Crawford is instant offense. He can score a lot and play make a bit. When the offense slows down, you bring him in. The prototypical sixth man.

by zeke5123 on Jun 24, 2011 12:27 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

I don't disagree on any of those points

I think until the hierarchy is established, the competition is open. JC and NY are different kinds of streaky…but wouldn’t you agree that they ARE streaky?

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 24, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I sitll expect the Wizards to suck next year...

… but there’s at least hope and almost every player can reasonable be expected to do better than last year be it due to age, lack of injury, etc…

Remaining concerns:

Defense – as in its still pretty suspect. Singleton helps, but I don’t expect him to get big minutes

Shooting – Wall and Crawford were poor shooters. Young is decent, so more minutes from him is a good thing. But none of the draft picks are big scorers and the team lacks much scoring punch

Lack of bona fide NBA starters – Wall is one. I’d say Nick Young is a least respectable. The others have potential, but it’s more what might be that what is.

by Rooper on Jun 24, 2011 12:32 PM EDT reply actions  

The defense is only suspect at the center position

Granted that’s the most important defensive position, but you’re talking Wall, Young, Jeffers, Booker, Singleton, and Seraphin (eventually). And maybe one day even H, if he pans out. That’s a lot of defense.

Interior defense at the center position is the hardest thing to get, and it was just plain to costly to acquire in this year’s draft (and its always a very expensive commodity on the FA market). On that note, am I the only one checking out the 2012 draft class already? LOL that’s sad.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we had taken Morris at 6,

Then Singleton would have gone to Houston at 14.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

And then we're right back at square one with Motiejunas at 18.

Of course I’m speculating. But that’s the nature of dominoes…

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

True or False

Ernie used our top pick on an unskilled, euroleague role player based on his athleticism.

by DCrez on Jun 24, 2011 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

False

He has a ton of skills. There’s more to basketball than dribbling and shooting (yes, I know that sounds ridiculous, but I mean it).

by Scizzy on Jun 24, 2011 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

I expect this is going to be posted soon

but it really made me a believer in Vesely, especially his defense and as a role player within the offense. Pruiti knows his stuff and I trust his evaluation.

http://nbaplaybook.com/2011/06/24/overseas-scouting-report-jan-vesely/

by Scizzy on Jun 24, 2011 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Thanks for the link

There’s some good footage there. Interesting assessment.

by satchmore on Jun 24, 2011 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

No.

I’m saying that changing a pick influences every pick after it (including next year’s draft). Dominoes. Better yet, butterfly effect. You can’ just sub out Vesely for Morris.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 4:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

This statement has be puzzled

The Wiz were a bad defensive team by any measure you could apply last year. I’m not sure why you would imply they are set on defense at 4 positions when they were among the worst teams in the league in defense last year. I admit there were individual games where specific guys played great, I watched Blatche seemingly frustrate Dirk and NY put up good contract year performances, but night in and night out they were just plain bad.

by Mixmy1200s on Jun 24, 2011 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm taking the long view

All of our potentially good defenders (Wall, Young, Jeffers, Booker, McGee, and Seraphin) are EXTREMELY young, with the exception of Nick, who is entering his prime. We added an elite defender, another good defender, and a hard working (if limited) defender in this draft.

I’m not saying we’ll be Bostonian good next year. But Miami’esque in a couple years is not out of the question.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Same problem

Where are the points gonna come from?
Young and Dray will get theirs then what???

by VBfan on Jun 24, 2011 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Washington

Averaged about 97 points a game last season. I think that number will jump up to 100 (assuming Nick is resigned, I think it’ll be 98 if he’s not). Here’s how I’d break the points down.
Wall 18
Nick Young 18
Blatche 17
Crawford 15
McGee 12
Lewis 11

I think the rest of the points will come from some combination of Booker, Seraphin, Singleton, Vessely and the rest of the bench.

by GJennings on Jun 24, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's like 110 points

Craw will be more like 11, Booker 7 or 8, singleton 7 or 8, vesely 5-10 depending on PT. Of course you can’t just add them all up due to injuries and such but I agree with the basic premise that scoring shouldn’t be that difficult.

by Mr. E on Jun 24, 2011 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have always been a needs person over BPA

But I think a big part of Big E’s strategy is to copy the Celtics/Garnett/Allen blueprint. In this current phase, we are stockpiling assets. It doesn’t really matter how much they fit in with the team concept, as much as how desirable they could be to other teams. At the same time, you are getting hard workers and winners. Could Seraphin, Booker, Vesely, Mack, Crawford, McGee and Dre all be as tradeable as Jeff Green and Delonte West? Yes.

by Unselds on Jun 24, 2011 1:10 PM EDT reply actions  

I like that idea

In order to be a contender, you need a superstar. We have wall who can become one someday but if we have these great pieces, we can trade for a great player like the celtics did but still have key role players.

by nhlnflnba18414 on Jun 24, 2011 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, was looking up what it took to get Garnett and Allen

Boston sent the Minnesota Timberwolves forwards Al Jefferson, Ryan Gomes and Gerald Green, guard Sebastian Telfair and center Theo Ratliff, two first-round draft picks and cash considerations. Besides Ratliff, 34, the other four are 24 or younger.

The Boston Celtics acquired guard Ray Allen from the Seattle Supersonics on Thursday night for Delonte West, Wally Szczerbiak and the rights to the 2007 NBA Draft’s No. 5 overall pick — Georgetown forward Jeff Green. Boston also gets the rights to the Sonics’ 35th pick — LSU’s Glen Davis.

That’s a helluva lot of picks!

by Unselds on Jun 24, 2011 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

This is why it would have been very difficult for Ernie to trade our 2012 pick (even if restricted) to Utah in a package for Kanter. Trading future picks severely restricts a team’s flexibility to make trades. For those of us who think we should have considered using our pick to trade up, you have to consider that we just don’t know how good Kanter will be. You only trade future picks for all-star caliber players, imo.

by Tbonebullets on Jun 24, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Equivalents for us

Mcgee(Al), Booker (Gomes), Mack (Telfair), Neck(Ratliff/filler), Craw(Green), 2 firsts, cash
 for D Howard

Blatche(Wally), Jan(green), Seraphin (Delonte)
for Melo

Wall
Young
Melo/Singleton
Shard
Howard/NDiaye

Find a Haslem clone, a shooter, and a vet backup PG in FA and that team could challenge Miami and Boston for supremacy.

by Mr. E on Jun 24, 2011 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kevin McHale?

He can’t be ignored as a big part of the trade. I doubt many other GMs would have approved.

by Emmet O'Neal on Jun 24, 2011 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Vesely a PF? Who's backup C?

How come Vesely isn’t a PF and Lewis a SF?

Also, can anybody on the roster besides Kevin play minutes at C? JaVale can’t stay out of foul trouble long enough to be relied on form more than 24-30 minutes.

It’d really free up our lineups if Vesely or Andre could play C now and then without getting obliterated.

P.S. I hope Seraphim makes my question look retarded next year

by b - Mac on Jun 24, 2011 1:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Dray can play C.

They also have the length to go small (or more accurately, tall and skinny) for a 5-10 minutes a game.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great read BNE.

Now I’m extra pumped to see the new look Wiz on the court.

New unis, new court, new young players…Can the season start already?
(Hopefully the new CBA gets done before the season starts.)

"McGee is running the transition? I'll stop him..." - James Jones

by BM22 on Jun 24, 2011 2:17 PM EDT reply actions  

You gotta look at it as If Nick Young is GOOOOne.

We can all think that Ernie is going to match an offer for Nick.
5 years at $8million per?
5 years at $10million per?

Will Nick still be a Wizard?
I think Jordan Crawford will be the starting Shooting Guard on Opening Day.

Nick will be on the West Coast where I know he is dying to be.

by jmpalomo on Jun 24, 2011 3:02 PM EDT reply actions  

No way Nick gets those numbers

and especially not with the CBA uncertainty.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are not many teams with the combination of capspace and need

by Emmet O'Neal on Jun 24, 2011 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

teams with 8m+ cap space before draft

NJN, TOR, DET, IND,CHA,WAS,HOU,MEM,DEN,MIN,OC,GSW,LAC,PHO & SAC
I think everyone has some SG atm and half of in rebuild mode anyway.

by vmr on Jun 25, 2011 5:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think Blatche should play more C this year

Finding a C that can rebound a little in FA would also help. Someone better than Oberto/Hilton. Troy Murphy, Pryz, Oden?

by Mr. E on Jun 24, 2011 3:46 PM EDT reply actions  

No thanks.

If you want a vet big, get him for tutoring purposes. Our cap space is not worth a marginal veteran big man for production purposes at this point.

Much better to try and get that in the draft, or cash in some of our glut of assets next offseason when teams are looking to dump salary because the new CBA is squeezing them harder than the Mob.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cap space?

We aren’t chasing big fish this year and it’d be a 1 year deal. That does not affect the cap at all. I don’t want to see Seraphin as the only C backup, sorry.

by Mr. E on Jun 24, 2011 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Apology accepted :-]

What kind of money are you talking here? Because off the bat, you’re not getting ANY worthwhile big on a one year deal. You’ll simply be outbid. You’re getting a tutor (or if you’re a contender you’re getting an extremely limited contributor – think Juwan Howard). You’re getting Oberto v2.

Anyway, when you’re talking about buying real, quantifiable big man rebounding production, you’re talking about paying $10-12M over three years at the very least.

My bad, I assumed you knew how expensive big men were.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's why everybody reaches for them in the draft.

If they were acquirable, then there’s no reason for EG to draft 5 of them in 2 years and park them on the roster until they get good or get used as trade bait. And there’s also no reason for EG to keep Blatche.

by jones-y on Jun 24, 2011 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

What??

The following sentence is entirely accurate.

If they were acquirable, then there’s no reason for EG to draft 5 of them in 2 years and park them on the roster until they get good or get used as trade bait.

Then in the next sentence you say there is no reason to keep Blatche, who is a 24 year old big man top 20 in the NBA in rebounds. Blatche is also easily one of the cheapest of the top 20 rebounders (for players not on their rookie contracts).

by JonathanJoseph on Jun 24, 2011 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

No you mis read me.

It should read like this: “If good were easily acquirable, then there’s no good reason for EG to keep Blatche.”

The point I was trying to make is that if it was easy or cheap to replace Blatche’s production, then he’d be long gone already.

by jones-y on Jun 25, 2011 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

OK let's try again:

“If good big men were easily acquirable, then there’s no good reason for EG to keep Blatche."

by jones-y on Jun 25, 2011 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Troy Murphy or Pryz get 3 years at 5m+ I will send you $1

by Mr. E on Jun 25, 2011 2:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well

I think this was really jones-y’s point:

Our cap space is not worth a marginal veteran big man for production purposes at this point.
And when you’re talking about
real, quantifiable big man rebounding production, you’re talking about paying $10-12M over three years
Those guys don’t really come to mind. Murphy is a stretch 4, Oden spends more time in a suit than Donald Trump, and not much in Pryzbilla’s only spared that comparison because he played with Greg Oden

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 25, 2011 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I just don’t think cap space matters cause I wasn’t talking about someone like Gasol. I brought up murphy because he’s a good bet to only get 1 year and can rebound. I guess if we take on an expiring deal that opens up more options but really there aren’t many FAs who fit our need of a decent backup 5

by Mr. E on Jun 25, 2011 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

And guys like Murphy want a one year deal on a contender only, not interested in playing nursemaid and losing starting jobs to young guns

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 25, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed on taking on the expiring (or 2-yrs-left) contract of a decent big man.

That’s a good strategy (cap-wise and roster wise), and that just may be very available if there are any significant changes to the CBA.

You’d get production and a tutor, and you’d get cap space back (or a potential trade chip) at the end of the deal.

by jones-y on Jun 25, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

And you'd get either a pick or a prospect in the trade...

That’s the price for taking the contract off their hands.

by jones-y on Jun 25, 2011 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

And just to illustrate how valuable cap space can be,

Last offseason, people wanted to use our cap space on a decent big man to split time with Dray and Javale. “We’re going to get killed inside.” And they were right, we got KILLED inside.

However… without the cap space to take on Kirk Hinrich’s $9m contract, we don’t get Kevin Seraphin, Jordan Crawford, or Chris Singleton (we got the latter two for turning around and trading Kirk Hinrich’s talent to Atlanta). We’re nowhere near as high on this team (Wall notwithstanding) without those three prospects.

It is ESSENTIAL to this rebuild to use our cap space very wisely. Essential. The way see it, its not that trades, FA signings, and the draft are three separate tools used for roster-building. Its that they are the three interwoven, inseparable elements of roster-building.

by jones-y on Jun 25, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I worry about rebounding

If someone can trick McGee into thinking chicks love rebounding I’m good

by AnyGiven on Jun 24, 2011 3:49 PM EDT reply actions  

8 boards in 27 mpg isn’t bad at all. If he’s playing 33, that is close to 10 rpg. Singleton should be an improvement from Thornton there. Just keep Blatche away from those sugary cocktails and we might be ok.

by Mr. E on Jun 24, 2011 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I remember those

It was very up and down though. I just hope for something consistant. Each game was like 8, 5, 9, 17!!!, 3, 5 and etc. I hope for 10rpg

by AnyGiven on Jun 24, 2011 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ap1204261494112_small
Enough With the Accessible Owner!!!

Recent FanPosts

Small
Rookies out of the playoffs
Small
BOYD, Part Deux?
Small
Stan Van
Small_monument_small
Team USA Basketball Tickets To Be Released on Wednesday, May 30 and I'm Really Happy That The Wizards Are Part of It
Stewey_small
If Wizards lose #1 lottery pick, will/can Chris Bosh fill that void?
Small
With the 4th Pick the Washington Wizards...
Small
My Thoughts on Grunfeld Extension
Small
Melo
Stewey_small
Flopping: Technical Foul in High School; NBA should follow their rule

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Ghanaouturuguaytrough_small M. Katz

Small Jeff Newman

Small jkahn15

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

402135_2504659589329_1638181922_1758918_1004201176_n_small Bullet Nation in Exile