What Do These Teams Ahead of Us Need?
There is a lot of debate about what's going to happen in the draft and who's going to go where, but probably the only certainty that we have right now is that we at least know what order everyone will draft in, but after that, there isn't much certainty. With that said, I thought it might be a good idea to look at all the teams that are scheduled to draft ahead of us and talk about what they need.
1. Cleveland Cavaliers, Needs: 1. PG 2. SF 3. C 4. SG
This team has big time holes at these four positions. An argument can easily be made for them draft to Derrick Williams #1 as much as someone can argue for them drafting Kyrie Irving #1. Either way, they still have holes to fill. It would not make a lot of sense for them to draft a PF given that they still have hope in JJ Hickson. Everywhere else seems fair game.
2. Minnesota Timberwolves, Needs: 1. C
Given that they just finally signed Ricky Rubio, it is clear that their greatest need is at C. Unless they can pull a draft day trade of Michael Beasley, they have potential starters everywhere except C. And unless they are willing to draft another foreign player to be their center of the future, it would probably be best for them to trade out because there really aren't a lot of options at C. If they are unable to trade for a C, then drafting another PF to come off the bench might be their best option.
3. Utah Jazz, Needs: 1. SG 2. PGUtah is stacked in the front court. They have one of the deepest young front courts in the league, but they don't really have much of a backcourt. Devin Harris is still on the books for two more years, so unless you plan on putting him on the bench, it may make more sense to draft a SG, but either way they need depth at both positions.
4. Cleveland Cavaliers, Needs: 1. PG 2. SF 3. C 4. SG
Ditto from earlier, but I would add, at this point, if they are still sitting at number 4, depending on who they draft, Williams or Irving, they will have a tough selection here. If they get Irving, then they can very easily select a SG, SF or even C (more than likely a foreigner) that compliments Irving's skill set and become that second cornerstone. Of course if they draft Williams then they have to think PG at this pick. There is no way they can continue to build a team with Session/Davis as their PG options. I think Session is nice but he should be a back up not a starter.
5. Toronto Raptors, Needs: 1. SF 2. PG
There is so much uncertainty with this team, especially with them firing Jay Triano (like he had much to work with!). They have pretty much locked up Andrea Bargnani for years to come, they gave Amir Johnson a ridiculous contract, and they drafted Ed Davis, so needless to say, most of their front court is locked up for the next few years. The problem right now is at SF and PG. At SF, they have Linas Kleiza and James Johnson under contract. At PG, they have Jose Calderon and Jerryd Bayless. Because they have DeMar Derozan, who isn't a great outside shooter, in the starting lineup, it would make sense to add a player who is a good outside shooter to compliment him in the backcourt or at least sure up their defense at either position. Given that their depth at SF is not good, I would imagine them adding a athletic SF type like Singleton or Leonard. Jose Calderon is still signed for another two years so adding a PG now might create a logjam at that position when they already have a gaping hole at SF.
What do you all think?
This represents the view of the user who wrote the FanPost, and not the entire Bullets Forever community. We're a place of many opinions, not just one.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i really really hate you right now cuz you just got my hopes really high about drafting enes kanter and its prbably not gonna happen
by hairlesschewbacca on Jun 2, 2011 3:12 PM EDT reply actions
I say we make a trade happen with Minnesota
I agree with you that they would likely target a C with their first pick. But taking a C with the second pick is a reach, especially since Kanter seems to be more of a PF. If I were a Minnesota, I’d be highly interested in Valanciunas or Biyombo, neither who are worth the #2 pick but are perfect pickups at #6. The only obstacle here is to determine what, if any, assets we have that are expendable and that they would want.
i think with rubio on board now, minn biggest need is at SG. it is def top 2. johnson is a SF, played out of position, and they are not happy with their production at that spot
by les boulez bomber on Jun 2, 2011 6:25 PM EDT reply actions
indeed. johnson is a 3 no doubt. and super-cool beasley is a 4. move love to 5, and all that line up is missing is a 2. we got a couple 2’s in crawford and young that could entice them to make a deal. just curious, if you could swing a hypothetical deal, would ya’ll swap dray for beasley?
I would not trade Blatche for Beasley
because Blatche is a true 4 and Beasley is a hybrid 4. Lets see. Rubio, Crawford, Johnson, Beasley, Love. I wonder what the Lakers would do to that team? Score about 200 points.
by hambonejackson on Jun 3, 2011 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions
It depends what the organization is looking for
Beasley is ‘effective’ @ the 3 & 4 positions if need be to create match up advantages, and besides he’s the better athlete!
Not sure about that
The reason why I don’t think they will move Johnson is just because they would still have to get rid of Beasley. I don’t think there is anyway you can expect Beasley to play PF and be a good team. It seemed like they thought both him and Love were a good combo, but if you move both of them to be a 4-5 then you’re looking at one of the worst defensive front courts in the league. If you add a defensive minded center next to Love, it would balance their lineup out much more. That’s just my opinion, but it just seem like a C is a much bigger need given how bad they are defensively.
by ThePGPhenomenon on Jun 3, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with you on Minny's needs
but I don’t see them trading out of the #2 spot, if only to ensure they can trade someone (WIlliams or Kanter) with high value whom they can trade for a veteran/high potential C – like JaVale. But as many of you have said, they also need a 2 guard, but from what I’ve seen there are not that many high potential 2s out there in the draft this year. Minny needs a 2 who can score to give Rubio a finisher besides Love – I’m not sold on Beasley or Johnson just yet. And as much as I love both NY1 and JC, I’d be able to live with packaging one of those guys with #6 to Minnesota for the #2 pick. This way we can get our guy and they get a 2 guard who can score (Young or Crawford, I really don’t care which as long as we get to keep one – RESIGN YOUNG PLEASE!!) and they can draft the highest ranked C prospect in Jonas Valancunias. In a perfect world we would keep both those guys and trade Blatche and #6 for #2, but I don’t think even Mr. Kahn is stupid enough to take that.
by Ron Carlos Jeines on Jun 3, 2011 9:22 PM EDT reply actions

by 
























