Wizards Vs. Cavaliers: Final Thoughts As Washington Gets First Road Win
I'm tempted to say that the Wizards did indeed approach their win over the Cleveland Cavaliers last night with a Game 7 mentality because of the 0-25 road record, but that seems a bit misleading the more I think about it. I don't deny that the Wizards played hard, but I suspect the real reason is much more simple: the Wizards are a better team.
That's not saying the Wizards focused, mind you, but I think it's saying that the Wizards did a lot of things they won't be able to do against another team. Andray Blatche isn't going to be able to dribble from the three-point line to the rim against most teams. JaVale McGee won't be able to power through defenders on offensive rebounds against most teams. Nick Young won't get uncontested layups against most teams. Etc. Once some of those things happened, the Wizards got confidence and played their game.
Credit the team, but also, let's recognize that there will be games the Wizards play like that and still lose.
Some quick player notes:
- Andray Blatche was fully engaged in this game early, and the result were outstanding. He was making quick, decisive moves offensively and working his butt off defensively. Maybe playing against Antawn Jamison was just the thing to get him going. It didn't always last, thanks to foul trouble, but I'll take it. The man isn't perfect, but he has the talent to dominate stretches of the game when he is fully engaged and using all his gifts. If I'm Flip Saunders, I'm showing Blatche the tape of that first quarter to jam into his head just how good he can be if he focuses.
- Nick Young hit some tough shots, sure, but not before getting off in rhythm early in the game. He had clean looks coming off screens, and I thought he did a nice job attacking Daniel Gibson when he was guarding him. I would have like his game even if he took fewer shots and scored fewer points.
- I thought John Wall settled a bit too much for perimeter jumpers early in the game (he was 2-8 from 16-23 feet, and that's too many attempts) when he could have attacked more, but he eventually got it together and was his typical speedy self in transition. I like that he pushed the ball to score too - he's fast enough to do that.
- Josh Howard was just tremendous. He played great defense when needed, and hit some huge shots early in the second half when the rest of the team looked a little flat. Josh is going to force some plays that aren't there, but overall, he brings a lot to the table, even if he's not much of a shooter. It's a tiny sample size, but the Wizards are 4-1 when he starts. Something to watch going forward.
- Kirk Hinrich was also tremendous, especially defensively. I wish he made less money, because he's the kind of person who is really good at some things (help defense, closing out on shooters, mid-range shots when the offense breaks down) and focuses on those things specifically. Good teams need guys like that, just not at $9 million per. But in general, I think he's played much, much better since Nick Young became a starter. Fewer minutes accentuates his strengths and limits his weaknesses.
- Twelve blocks for the Wizards in this one, which is great, but probably not sustainable against other teams.
- Wasn't wild about JaVale McGee's game, but he was +21, so there was probably something to his presence that made a difference.
- I liked seeing Cartier Martin and Trevor Booker get key bench minutes. Again, these are guys with limited skill sets, but they play hard and do certain things very well. Nothing against Al Thornton, but he's essentially slightly below-average at everything except maybe shot creation. I'd rather have someone who can bring a specific skill to the table, whether it's shooting (Martin) or speed and rebounding (Booker).
- Overall, this was an excellent offensive performance (119.8 points/100 possessions, 57.1 effective field goal percentage, only 11.5% of possessions ending in a turnover). A lot of that was Cleveland, but much of it was because everyone made quick decisions with the ball.
More links to come.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Whoooohooo!
Really happy to get this monkey off their back.
Hopefully this liberates them and they play with more joy and positive energy than they have been doing so far. I don’t care if it actually translates to more wins or not. Were a lottery team period, i just want to see this play hard, have fun and get better.
Leeeeeeeeeeeegoooo!
"If you don't shoot, you can't score"
Johan Cruijff
" My psychiatrist just doesn't know what I go through. He is a Lakers fan" Hambonejackson
by Dutch Hoopfan on Feb 15, 2011 8:16 AM EST up reply actions
relished espn crawl last night
“Wizards improve to 1-25 on the road”
hilarious!
Great to get this road win.
Hope this game reminds the team not to play like the Cavs, esp. on the defensive end. And the team needs to defend the 3 pointers better on Wed playing in Orlando.
Any word on Lewis? Will he be able to go on Wed? Would be nice to see him play aginst his old team.
If the Wizards played like this and still lost to other teams
I’d be fine with it… just show us that kind of effort. Then we’ll see some real developing of our young team
I liked the effort last night
but no denying there were some really sloppy plays down the stretch. Good thing we had a 25 pt buffer zone.
I think JaVales +/- was so high because
Every single time he came out, cleveland would attack the basket.
Every time he was back in the game, they settled for jumpers.
Its like this game in and gane out though. Despite how frustrated we get with him as fans, the amount of layups the opposing team gets when hes on the bench is mindblowing. Our interior d is awful, but with him in the game, guys really do think twice about attacking the rim. Its noticeable every game.
by DCeee on Feb 14, 2011 11:41 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I agree with that 100%, but still didnt like how he played last night.
Bogut is as physical as anybody in the league and Javale busts out a 35%DRR….followed up by DRRs in the low teens against Spurs and Cavs. Not sure what explains that.
On the other hand, gotta love the incremental offensive development we’ve seen of late
I thought he played pretty poorly actually
If you watch him closely he gives up 4-10 points a night jumping for shots that he couldnt possibly block and having the miss go directly to the guy he left. That with all the goaltends really puts him in the hole defensively so it’s tough for him to ever have a positive impact on that side of the floor.
by BayAreaBullet on Feb 14, 2011 2:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
i agree
I agree. Just having Mcgee out on the court is worth ten points a game, regardless of what he does. the other team is just not going to drive to the basket like they do (constantly) when he’s on the bench. even in the nba guys are embarassed about blocked shots.
even when they do drive they often throw up crazy-akward shots out of JaVale fear.
he may look like amateur hour sometimes but he’s a presence. no other wizard has it on defense.
other teams attack the basket to try to get spot points
because mcGee goes after most shots that come his way. He gave them four points ( 2 goaltends)an and could have gotten another couple such shots. If I were another team I’d attack the hoop more to try to get mcGee to goaltend or foul me. Jamison’s floaters are candy for McGee to swat and at least one of the two goaltends were from AJ
by thewiz06 on Feb 14, 2011 2:35 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I agree with your sentiments re: Al
I think Al pretty much defines “replacement level player”. He’s had some good games and some good efforts this year, but he doesn’t contribute in any one particular area enough to really make a strong impression, especially since it seems he hasn’t been quite as aggressive driving to the hole as he was at the beginning of the year. I’m not as Cartier-crazy as some other BF’ers, but Cartier does bring long-range shooting on a team that isn’t exactly deadly outside the arc. Among him, Grown-Ass Man- who rebounds, energizes, and defends effectively- and Josh Howard, who hasn’t yet had a bad game with us, there are plenty of guys I’d rather see on the court, so I’m not too crazy about seeing Al getting major minutes
From the District of Columbia, home of the hyperbolic paraboloid transitional floating zone defense.
by mr. 91 on Feb 14, 2011 1:53 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Am I the only person
Who thinks Josh Howard is a valuable trade chip – if he shows he is healthy? Tiny contract, no long-term implications. A playoff team in need of a three should call the Wizards.Assuming he plays more before the deadline,is he worth a conditional draft choice? A team like the Lakers could use him.
by zeke5123 on Feb 14, 2011 4:31 PM EST via mobile reply actions
He has to waive his bird rights to be traded so that makes it alot more complicated.
Who knows if he would waive it but considering when faced with the decision this summer to make less money but play for a contender he chose to take the bigger paycheck with us I’m not sure he’d be willing to do that. Of course if we told him we weren’t gonna re-sign him no matter what that might change things. Right now he has to make it through a week healthy before worrying about stuff like that.
by BayAreaBullet on Feb 14, 2011 4:42 PM EST up reply actions
Will there even be Bird Rights in the new CBA?
If he could play well for a contendor, he’ll make a decent check next year. But I agree – we’ll see if/how he plays the next week. But he fits in perfectly for a playoff team needing a SF. His contract is perfect.
by zeke5123 on Feb 14, 2011 4:54 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
We ain't using his Bird rights.
So we can go over the cap to sign him to a big long term deal? I doubt it.
Maybe he’s the answer to Boston’s problems.
by MR on Feb 14, 2011 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah CBA makes my head hurt
I was just pointing out he basically has a no-trade clause(He has to waive it if traded this year regardless of future CBA) and chose money over contending(totally not bashing him for that in any way) this summer.
by BayAreaBullet on Feb 14, 2011 5:03 PM EST up reply actions
He has no Bird rights.
We didnt pick up his option, he became a FA, then we re-signed him (i think)
I am a little bit surprised he hasn't been traded
He can refuse any team in a trade, but if its a playoff team I imagine he would waive that, but if he wants to stay with the Wiz, I am all for re-signing him.
by hambonejackson on Feb 14, 2011 5:57 PM EST up reply actions
Josh is really a contributor if he stays healthy....
I would only trade him for a real asset…. but I think he brings a lot to the WIzards’ table and has from the moment he got here and realized that this was his last best chance to rebuild what once a pretty solid NBA reputation.
I like the Howard Lewis combo next season
I don’t know if it can happen, but it doesn’t look so bad to me.. Bring in a 5 guy and put him with those 2 and this team might start looking like a playoff team next season. Against SA, our 5 guy gets 3 boards and our 2 guy goes 2-8. That is unacceptable. I don’t care what this team does against the shit teams. I care what about they do against Orlando and Dallas and SA. If you want to be a play off team, then people had better start looking at those games. Even the Celtics game was nice, but wait until you meet them in the play offs. See how they play then. Grunfeld and Saunders can be fired and they both want to win and they can not put out a team next season that can’t win 25 games. Let Leonsis deal with season ticket holders next season and tell them this team is young. This team needs to win 40 games. This team needs to be what people want and expect, and that is a play off caliber team. The pressure is on. its on the players and Grunfeld and Saunders and Leonsis. This team has 30 games left this season. So, that is 30 games for this team to show it can compete with some of the contenders in this league. Its no shame to lose to SA, but it was bad. If this team comes out against Orlando in this next game and get their asses wiped, then I don’t care if it is a road game, this team will be exploded. I predict this team will come out and fight hard, but if you don’t have the players to do it, then the team is simply going to have to start bringing them in this off season. That means players gone and new players in. Everyone is going to start fighting for their jobs.
by hambonejackson on Feb 14, 2011 7:45 PM EST up reply actions
I disagree with every sentence of this post.
by disgrunted on Feb 14, 2011 9:56 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
I understand why you disagree
but lets see how things transpire. If I am wrong, I am wrong.
by hambonejackson on Feb 14, 2011 11:23 PM EST up reply actions
I wii defend myself this way
If Young is not re-signed, thats 1 gone Lewis is gone at the end of next season
McGee may not re-sign then Blatche is traded
and that leaves Wall. Grunfeld dumped everyone but Arenas over a weekend, and he traded Arenas. Thats one team. Armstrong is probably gone. Thorton might be gone. Yi might be gone. I don’t know about Howard. Maybe they will try to keep him.
That will basically leave a roster of Wall, Booker, Seraphin, whoever they draft in June and whoever this team brings in after next season. in fact, some of those players might come in this off season. So, I think it is important that this team can demonstrate that they can compete against a team like Orlando. Unless Grunfeld is happy to build one of the worst teams in the NBA before he is fired.
by hambonejackson on Feb 15, 2011 8:44 AM EST up reply actions
I don't think you need to defend yourself
You are just expressing one school of thought — that the Wizards should put together the best team it can as soon as it can. In my view, that approach is what typified the Abe Pollin era, so I’m going to be patient. I could care less if the Wizards end up in the lottery next season and the one after that. I just want to see a real plan for once, and growth. I’ve been following this team for decades, and will for decades more. Just once I would like to enjoy a payoff, and no, I don’t mean “competing” in or even winning a first round playoff series.
Your last sentence points to a real issue, though — whether Grunfeld feels pressure to get short term results to save his job, and as a result, cuts corners on the plan.
The team needs to be better closing out the year than it was to start it.
if we get to the end of this season and all that’s happened is Nick appears to be a legit starting SG…and then we lose him, that’s a season down the crapper. Ted was pretty explicit about forming an identity etc etc…have to see SOME measure of progress
One badaspect of Pollin
was unwillingness to spend money on FAs to help the.one or 2 good players the team had. Hopefully Leonsis will be different. And if Wall played for Pollin, Pollin would trade Wall before his contract came around for some low rent players.
Another thing is so see how many players make a team. With Orlando, its been Nelson and Howard. The Celtics are 5 players. SA its 3 players., and so on. Because you pay your best players. So no team wants to be tied up in too many big contracts. With Wizards, who are not even close to being a playoff team, I see 2 starters, and 3 bench players posing as starters and one bench player is being paid starting money. So how much do want to pay this team?
Another consideration is that most teams around the league are not built strictly through the draft. Most are a combination of FAs and draft picks So, if 2 players can be brought a and remove 2 players and now you are in the playoffs, I think Grunfeld will do it. It 2 players the last time, Arenas and Jamison.
For some reason, people want this team to accumulate lottery picks season after season hoping to build super team. The clippers won the draft twice and I don’t know how many lottery picks and they still aren’t super team. The Bulls have been the same way. 2 lottery picks in one draft, I think twice. And it took 2 lottery picks and Boozer. so they still had to resort to free agency. Which means, if the Wiz score in this draft, then maybe they are only 1 or 2 free agents away from being an Eastern contender, which I am guessing they would prefer.
by hambonejackson on Feb 15, 2011 1:32 PM EST up reply actions
if youd ask me
feels like all games are equally important… since we’re rebuilding, it’s all about the process not the result… so games against shitty teams means just as much against games against good teams since we won’t be contending with this roster anytime soon
by Young Wook Lee on Feb 15, 2011 3:02 AM EST up reply actions
Go Wiz!
I missed most of the game last night so I didn’t get a chance to enjoy the string. But I caught the end, great win, about time.
Nick Young opponent PER watch
Looking at the box score, Cavs starting back-court was 7-19 with 9TOs. That’s probably a 10ish PER…

by 























