We Were Warned
When the Wizards started their season two years ago (2009-10), their "projected starting 5" was Gilbert Arenas, Mike Miller, Caron Butler, Antawn Jamison, and Brendan Haywood, with Randy Foye, Andray Blatche, and DeShawn Stevenson as the top reserves off of the bench.
A lot has changed in two years!
When Ted Leonsis bought this team and took a wrecking ball to it's roster he made it clear that the team was "REBUILDING", with the intention of changing the makeup of their team from a veteran lead roster (see above) to a young core that will be able to stay competitive over a longer period of time.
As fans we immediately ate it up...as much as we could! After all the Washington Capitals were the area's best pro team and they were in the midst of a 4-5 year run in the Stanley Cup Playoffs and getting better (so we thought). We saw how Leonsis built the Caps around young players, traded proven vets for picks, and had stockpiled "homegrown" talent.
Leonsis implemented his rebuild to the Wizards and warned the fans that their would be painful times before their would be good times. This is what I think many of us fans (short for fanatic) are forgetting. Instead of being quick to judge or overly negative, take a step back and looking at how the front office has totally retooled a veteran roster into a roster with 8 draft picks over the last two years...EIGHT...this is isn't the NFL!. Amongst those 8 draft picks, SIX...yes SIX are former 1st round picks!
However, this is the painful time Ted warned us of!
John Wall was named "captain" of the team before his first ever NBA game and instantly he has become the "face of the franchise", all before his 21st birthday. That's a lot of pressure to put on a kid! He's working hard and he's definitely trying to turn this team around, but in the end, he's the best player on a team with a lot of other unproven young players. He feels the pressure, you can see it on his face when he's playing, he's definitely not the loose player, trash talking, that we see in practice or from over the summer. Once he gets more comfortable on the court and gains some maturation, he will become the force that we all believe he can be, right now he's just forcing it to much.
Patience is what is needed right now!
This Wizards roster has lots of talent on it, but other than John Wall, there isn't a player they've drafted or acquired that was ready to step in from day 1 and be an NBA starter. Kevin Seraphin, Trevor Booker, Jordan Crawford, Jan Vesely, Chris Singleton, etc... none of these guys were "NBA ready" when the team drafted them. Booker, Crawford, and Singleton were solid NCAA vets, but not "elite" players in their class and projected more as good 6th-7th men off the bench. Seraphin and Vesely are young "Euro's" drafted on potential and upside. The same can be said of JaVale McGee and Andray Blatche from the Eddie Jordan era (they're just not European...well, JaVale was "Pierre" over the summer, but I digress).
Despite the current "tough times", Ted's plan has been executed perfectly!
This 66 game season is exactly what the doctor ordered, because it's setup for the team to play a lot of games in a condensed period of time, play their depth due to the amount of games ahead, and not really worry about their record, due to the short season. What matters this year is the development of those 8 draft picks (not so much N'diaye), along with McGee and Blatche. This is their chance to prove their case to be a part of the franchise's future and nobody knows that more than Nick Young, who's had first had experience that it's tough to become a respected NBA player when playing for an annual loser...talk about a much needed reality check!
Be patient with this group and let them get better. If there's a complete lack of effort (like on Friday), they need to be held accountable, but jumping on Wall, Crawford, Booker, Seraphin, and Singleton for missing shots, trying to hard, or being out of position, is unjust.
Ted's rebuilding plan is right on schedule!
This year is only the 2nd year of the rebuild and no real rebuild happens in just one year, this is a 3 year process at the minimum. At the end of this season, the 2nd full season of the rebuild, the Wizards will most likely have another top 5 pick and well over $30 million in available cap space, putting them in a position to be "playoff competitive" to start the 3rd season of the master plan...that's not bad people!
If you ask me the two preseason games are completely in line with that I expect to see during much of the regular season, after all the regular season starts on Monday! It's going to be ugly at times, the players are going to struggle to score on most nights, and the losses will easily hit 40 in this 66 game schedule, but it's not about that this year. It's a long term plan, with long term success as the goal. Pump the brakes with all of the "hate" and lets give these young players a chance to get some NBA minutes under their belts before we label them as "busts" or anything else.
,
This represents the view of the user who wrote the FanPost, and not the entire Bullets Forever community. We're a place of many opinions, not just one.
57 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I understand the plan and will put up with losing this year
but listlessness will be called out at every opportunity.
Even when we lose, we need to lose with dignity, like we did in Miami game last March in a fanpost that was a rallying cry for Wizards fans worldwide.
by thewiz06 on Dec 21, 2011 2:06 PM EST reply actions 4 recs
Agreed
I did say if they play the way they did on Friday, that they deserve the criticism.
Lack of effort and hustle needs to be called out, missing shots and getting beaten by a better opponent doesn’t.
by SpecialSauce on Dec 21, 2011 7:52 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah sometimes I get carried away...
But when you start mixing love for my team and the dislike I have for that other one… recipe for getting carried away.
And can I say, what a bitch move??? Like, who reacts like that to a fake foul?!
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 22, 2011 3:29 PM EST up reply actions
i even remember seeing it live
at first glance, yes, it’s possible that bosh got pushed, albeit lightly.
However, the replay shows the flop since it wasn’t a knee-jerk reaction to getting hit on the nose….
I'm not sure
If this plan really works in basketball. Youth doesn’t matter that much in basketball. The teams that usually win are the veteran teams
Well....
except for all those young guys on the Thunder…. and all those young guys on the Grizzlies…. and oh yeah, those young guys on the Clippers….. and uh…………well, you get my point….
Those three teams rebuilt via the draft (and shrewd trades)… Minnesota will be much better this year – after drafting high for the last 4 years…
Boston did the exact same thing – except when they got to a certain point, they traded all their young guys for Kevin Garnett… That trade would have never happened, and the Celtics would never have won the Championship – if they didn’t build their assets through the draft…..
We see other teams “buying” their way to relevance (Miami, New York, New Jersey) – but how many BOUGHT teams have won the Championship? Well… I guess Dallas counts… But the point is that there are multiple ways to build a winning team in the NBA…. Building through the draft is the easiest, cheapest and unfortunately longest way….
I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.
Dallas Drafted Their Star
Dirk was homegrown and they built around him.
by SpecialSauce on Dec 21, 2011 7:47 PM EST up reply actions
they also grossly overpaid FAs for over a decade before they finally won.
by DCrez on Dec 21, 2011 9:44 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
i'm not sure that's true
for instance, they let steve nash walk.
they’ve had a high payroll for a long time and they’ve made a lot of smart trades involving being willing to go over the cap but i’m not sure they’ve made a bunch of high priced free agent signings, or given out any contracts that look that bad or overpriced in hindsight.
i’m hopeful ted is willing to go over the cap once we have a core in place that justifies it.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 21, 2011 10:48 PM EST up reply actions
Cuban decided Nash was over-the-hill so didnt try to keep him
he’s talked about that as a big mistake, but it wasnt a money issue as I recall
either way, they didn't sign him
i’m struggling to think of an example of the mavericks overpaying for a free agent…
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 22, 2011 10:52 AM EST up reply actions
erick dampier is a good example
mostly because he didn’t pan out. but they traded for haywood, so he wasn’t someone else’s FA, and i’m not ready to say that was an unreasonable signing. those are two centers. haywood is starting for them this year. they could probably trade him without it being a salary dump.
i still haven’t made the leap from there to grossly overpaying FAs for a decade. the vast majority of the contracts they’ve signed have been smart and i’m not sure they’ve been a big player on the FA market.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 22, 2011 11:33 AM EST up reply actions
Mostly
He has never been hesitant to acquire that extra player, putting him wayyy over the luxury tax.
I don’t think they’ve had many terrible contracts, but he’s never allowed his bottom line to slow him down either. Think the Lakers dumping Odom, a player that could obviously still contribute something to a good team. Instead, they said good bye to save some $$$. Not something Cuban has done.
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 22, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions
this sounds right to me
saying cuban was willing to pay the lux tax is entirely different from saying they’ve grossly overpaid FAs for a decade
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 22, 2011 3:05 PM EST up reply actions
He hasn't been the worst decision maker
When it comes to bad contracts. But I’d say he’s made more bad decisions than good ones. After all, being a top spender for so many years could have maybe yielded a little bit more success. But that’s not for a lack of trying on the owners part.
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 22, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions
i'm still trying to identify the bad decisions
in terms of contracts he’s handed out. so far we have dampier and haywood. not sure i buy haywood.
(not a challenge or anything, just curious)
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 22, 2011 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
he seems to target centers
marquis daniels was their own guy that they acquired essentially through the draft. in some respects that contract was a whopper. in others, $6 million per, it didn’t do much damage.
definitely questionable signings but marginal negative impact it seems
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 22, 2011 5:44 PM EST up reply actions
they re-signed Haywood for 6yr/$55mill when he became an FA
after we traded him. Within 2 weeks Cuban had gone out and signed Chandler and by the postseason Brendon was basically waiving towels
And now they are stuck with Brendon instead on Tyson
Not that Brendon is a bad center, because he IS solid, but that long term contract forced them to let Chandler walk. That and Ian Mahimi looks like he is going to be their starting center in the future.
Well if you have a top 3 payroll every year
Ideally, if you’re getting what you’re paying for, you should have a top 3 team every year. Right?
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 22, 2011 8:43 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
they've averaged like 57 wins over the last decade!
and now they’ve won a title. in light of that your comment seems a bit dismissive.
if he’s “overpaying” i was curious to learn who he wasn’t getting value for. seems like a bunch of centers. maybe there is value in overpaying for a center…
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 23, 2011 12:58 AM EST up reply actions
It seems your point
Has more basis than the perception that he does overpay.
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 23, 2011 2:25 AM EST up reply actions
they also got embarssed in the playoffs several times including a loss to the 8th seed
after having the best record in the NBA. In fact, if they hadnt won this past year people would still be pointing the Mavs as “proof” that big spending doesnt really work. And Dirk would still have the choker label swirling around him. But they DID win, so now all that flips on its head and Cuban is a genius and Dirk is one of the greatest ever. Funny how that all works
If you're basing it off regular season records
Which is fair, then he’s been getting what he paid for for years.
And you’re right, if they hadn’t gotten it done last year, then it would be an entirely different story. It would be easy to argue he’s been overpaying everybody, just to get bounced out of the playoffs by smaller salary teams.
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 23, 2011 4:49 PM EST up reply actions
i, for one, have always liked what he's done
packed arenas and 50+ win every season is as much as this fan could ask for.
Yeah its about how you look at it.
And honestly, he’s turning a profit every year I gotta assume. So from a business perspective, he is doing fine.
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 24, 2011 7:34 PM EST up reply actions
here is cubans entire thought process on the matter
http://blogmaverick.com/2004/07/03/steve-nash-part-1/
so there was a money issue as well, but not JUST a money issue.
This is pretty old, but if you have never read it, its worth reading…
I dont care what the D.N.A. Says, the Guy wearing number 12 Cannot be Kirk Hinrich, he is definetly Kurt. Kirk can actually play basketball!
I think it's justified because
the Mavs were consistently winning 50 or more games a year every year for the last 10 years, and no one contract truly blew up in their faces.
Whenever any team wins 50 or more games and gets homecourt advantage in the playoffs in at least the 1st round, and the Mavs did that most years, that team has a decent shot to advance at least a round or two. Granted, the Mavs lost a bit early a number of times in the last four or five years before 2011, but even then, the moves to build that type of roster over that long period of a time was worth it because Dirk has been very good for very long.
I wasnt suggesting I disagreed with the strategy
in fact I’ve often said having a Cuban or Prokorov owner would be sweet. Consistently winning 50+ games in front of sold out arenas and always being on national TV pays all the bills and very much satisfies the fanbase. Win-Win
i think he was implying that simply having a prokorov or cuban spend a bunch of money
doesn’t necessarily get you 50 wins every year. dirk set them up to get 50 wins every year. and they drafted dirk. if simply spending money means you’re good, the knicks would have been good for a while. instead they’ve sucked for a decade.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 22, 2011 12:36 AM EST up reply actions
What have those teams won yet
The Thunder might be the youngest team you named but Memphis had vets playing big roles (Randolph, Allen, Battier and even Gay has been in the league for 5 years). Clippers have a Blake but the rest of their team is veterans (Caron, Paul, Billups, Foye). We are trying to build completely through youth. Who are the key veterans on this team? Blatche? Lewis?
Look at how old the last 11 championship teams have been Dallas, Lakers, Celtics, Spurs & Pistons.
generally speaking NBA championship teams
are made of a combination (more than one) of the following:
1. One homegrown star/core player (drafted by the team like Wade for the Heat, or at least started his career with that team in Kobe’s case)
2. Owners who will spend when the team has a legit chance to get players (pretty much everybody)
3. At least some other players have also been drafted by the same team. (Celtics had Davis and Rondo; Spurs made a kiling off of their drafts)
4. Shrewd trades to acquire major pieces (Lakers and Celtics got most of their core players this way; Miami got Shaq via trade)
I'd settle to have any of those team's fates, even thought they haven't won YET. And so would you.
The point is not just having and winning with your young players. It’s about drafting developing those young guys into good players(Durant, Gay, Westbrook, Conley, Blake, Denadre Jordan, Marc Gasol, Ibaka, etc…).
Or then turning the young players into assets to acquire players that make you even better (Green turned into Perkins, or Gordon and Aminu turned into Paul).
Lastly, nobody said we can’t sign veteran’s as important pieces to our success. But that’s in due time. Memphis didn’t go get Tony Allen or Shane Battier in Rudy Gay’s second year. They geared up for the postseason with vets when the time came.
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 22, 2011 3:19 PM EST up reply actions
I guess it depends on how you define veteran....
I wouldn’t say Gay or Allen or Foye are veterans. Battier and Billups are old. Randolph and Butler are in their primes. Plus, all of those teams have a mix of ages.
by Kenny Sky Walker on Dec 28, 2011 7:47 PM EST up reply actions
Well, well.....................
Here is what youth gets you. It gets coaches fired, creates frustration on the floor, creates off the court incidents and controversy. Experience wins in the NBA not youth. NBA history has proven this time and time again. You win with experience, you win with vets, you win with free agent signings and trades. Other than the Spurs no other team has won a championship by drafting its core players. Ted knows this so why is he trying to sell us this obvious ………………………
Problem is
Wall doesn’t look like a Nowitzki, Durant, or Griffin. I know he is very very young and a PG but he looks well behind Rose in development.
My concern isn’t so much with pace of development as it is with a PG drafted #1 who can’t shoot and makes up for it with bad perimeter defense and decision making on the break. My biggest issue is his defense. There is no reason why he can’t right now be one of the best defenders at PG. I think it’s a physical issue. I don’t think the guy can get low on defense.
Yeah his center of gravity is too high on defense
He can’t get in a squatting lunge position, which limits his lateral quickness. Gil had the same problem. Until he fixes that, I don’t think he’ll ever be a great defender.
Formerly know as iNFamous SWaGG
there's no excuse whatsoever for Wall not to be a great defender
he’s a superb athlete, almost a DWade clone who should be able to wreak havoc on defense….any defensive problems start between his ears imho
The Tools are There
He’s got everything it takes physically to be a “shut down” defender. He’s a tall PG, long arms, and great lateral quickness, not to mention instincts, but right now the kid’s got so much on his plate we can’t expect him to go from 16 and 8 rookie to 25, 10, and 2.5 steals sophomore.
I think it’s also unfair to compare Wall to D. Rose and what he did from year 1 to year 2. Rose’s Bulls are much more NBA ready then Wall’s Wizards.
The positive is that we all acknowledged that Wall needed to work on his jumper, he did this off season, and that’s a step in the right direction. Everything can’t be put on his shoulders and that’s why he needs better players around him. Perhaps these rookies and 2nd year guys will get better, or maybe they get the next piece in the ’12 draft, or maybe they add it through trade or FA.
Wall will shine when he’s got other players around him to help shoulder the load, not to mention hit the open “J”. Until then he’s going to try and do it all himself and go 1,000,000 mph like we’ve been seeing.
by SpecialSauce on Dec 21, 2011 10:02 PM EST up reply actions
Biggest difference between Wall and Rose
is that Rose got onto a good team, and a team that had a number of players that have been together for a stretch like Hinrich, Gordon, and Deng. Of course, two of these guys are on other teams now, but they are all good players that played well together generally speaking and helped facilitate Rose too. Wall doesn’t have that.
i think the biggest difference is that Rose is a pure scorer
so his teamates are irrelevant in the sense that he can drop 35 no matter what else is going on….Wall is going to have to understand and learn the game moreso than Rose if he’s going to be a pass first player that makes everyone else better. That’s arguably a more difficult task than harnessing your “natural” ability to score the way Rose has.
And really, I wouldnt mind at all if Wall works on his scoring a lot this year and often leads the team in FGAs as it will help him in the long run
+10000000
I actually like see wall take his shots and at this point I would rather see him shoot than any one else just because of the potiental he has. His shot looks 5x better than last year and to make my case a little, Jordan Crawford’s looks 5x worse, and hes taking every shot he can. That’s what I wanna see wall do then look to find his teammates when he can’t get a good shot. Then his game can turn MVP like rose
by no more kwame's in dc on Dec 22, 2011 12:58 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I'd rather see Wall going for 25 ppg this year
than see him make good passes to players who can’t convert as well.
If Rondo was a Wizard and had the same mentality he has on the Celtics (and we know his shooting is bad), we’d probably be sunk already…
Mostly
I think we’ve overreacted to two preseason games in spectacular fashion.
It’s actually kind of amazing. When some of us fans talk about looking for small individual improvements this season and maybe a little more cohesion as a team, its the nice way of saying, we’re going to suck as a team, but hopefully a few players show signs that that won’t always be the case.
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 22, 2011 3:12 AM EST via Android app reply actions
This is a disaster waiting to happen................
With all due respect I couldn’t disagree with you more. Nothing you have said and nothing Ted has done makes any sense from an NBA perspective.
1. In the NFL you have a practice squad where you can draft and develop players. In hockey you have the minor leagues where young players are drafted to and allowed to develop. In the NBA you don’t have either scenario. NBA teams do not draft players to be assigned to the D-League for teaching and development. The same dynamic is not in play. Players have to be able to contribute and contribute rather quickly. No other team is drafting this many projects for development purposes! Every one else is looking for guys who can play, guys that can catch on quickly, guys that can help them win games!
2. As I have said in other posts, you can not have a roster of guys who are all learning how to play there respective positions all at the same time! It is the reason that Flip has difficulty implementing a system. No one is proficient enough at there position to be worried about x’s and 0’s This team needs teaching not coaching and thats not what NBA franchises are in business to do.
3. finally, there is John Wall’s rookie contract to consider. The wizards have picked up the option on his rookie deal so I am guessing he is locked in for 5 years. This is year 2 of five where we are going to be horrendous once again. At what point does Ted Leonsis begin to make a commitment to winning, not developing talent. John Wall is not staying here with loosing season after loosing season after loosing season!
Some of this thinking I contribute to this being a football town and everyone equating all sports to football. Some of this thinking can be linked to the Caps and how hockey works. But the NBA is not structured and run like either sport. This strategy will only lead to decades of rebuilding not just a couple of years. Once you get your first true player signed you only have the length of his rookie contract to get the rest of the pieces tother. Duncan stayed because there was enough talent around him at the time of his free agency. The same is true for Kevin Durant. If in year 4 there is not a winning viable championship caliber team in place, JOHN WALL WILL LEAVE……..
THEN WHAT TED………………….
This man doesn’t know what he is doing and will do more harm to this team then Abe Pollin.
That’s a scary thought…………..
Short Sighted Thinking
I’m not really sure what you think the team should have done or could have done with as many high dollar, long tern, veteran contracts that made up their roster two years ago? What were the Wizards supposed to do with Antawn, Gil, and Caron? It’s not like other team’s were constantly calling the team, inquiring about those guys.
When Ted bought the team he made a major decision, but one that will ultimately affect his own pockets more than anything else (so lets face the reality, he’s got more to lose then we do). He decided to rebuild and basically start over. That’s a ballsy decision and one that he knew would further drive the “average fan” farther from the arena then they had been currently, but also one that could eventually bring them by the bus load as they do now for the Capitals.
NBA teams can build through a total youth movement, the Thunder have done it, the Grizzlies are doing it, the Pacers are doing it, many NBA teams can build their roster through “homegrown” or drafted players. However, what makes the NBA different from all other leagues is that in the NBA one player can easily make a difference between a 40 win team and a 50 win team or a playoff team to an actual contender. With only 5 players on the floor, each player represents 20% of the team. My point being, once the team identifies their major weakness, ie: SG or PF, they can zone in on finding the best player to fit their need, whether through trade or free agency.
Bottom line is that Ted is a smart business man and it’s easy to see his business sense coming through in his ownership philosophy. Ted’s approach with the Wizards is basic sales 101, the more calls you make, the more sales you’re going to have….play the percentages. Translating that to basketball, draft 10 prospects and hope 4-5 actually develop into something, because the odds are they all won’t pan out.
Once again, this is only the 2nd year of the rebuild. Plus the more we (bloggers, fans, media) talk about John Wall’s unhappiness and desire to leave for a contender, the more it will force him to think about it. The kid hasn’t even laced him up yet for his 2nd season and we’re already panicking about him leaving.
by SpecialSauce on Dec 25, 2011 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed. There is one major flaw though
Everybody we drafted, other than Wall, is not likely to become anything more than a good rotation player in their prime. Kinda what Battier is for the Heat or Ibaka for the Thunder.
We are not the powerhouse franchise that is going to lure in FA’s so if we sign one it would be like a Zach Randolph signing; a second tier player who’s doubtfull but for some reason pans out great.
The other, more likely, route is that we trade for our second star. Again, D.C. is not a prime NBA destination, so a Melo type trade is not likely. A Celtics type trade for Garnet and Allen to complement Pierce is more realistic imho. Both Garnet and Allen were not asking for a trade to Boston but once they got there, it clicked and they stayed.
It’s a longshot for a none-prime NBA destination like D.C., Minnesota, Toronto or Cleveland to ever be contending. That’s why I was somewhat pro owner or atleast pro system changes during the lockout. We can use all the help we can get.
The other major questionmark here is, is John Wall going to be as good as he was advertised to be? We can scream he is going to leave if we don’t improve our roster all we want but besides a few games early last season, I haven’t seen a Lebron or Wade type talent yet.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Dec 26, 2011 7:38 AM EST up reply actions
long year ahead
I’m all for patience if the Wizzies start charging D-League prices to watch the traveling sh*t show that they’ve got on the floor. Right now, we’ve got one legit NBA player – and it’s a guy everyone thinks we should’ve gotten rid of (’Shard) – and one guy who everyone THINKS is going to be good in Wall.
At full NBA prices Ted better move from his underachieving Caps to making the Wizards at least a full member of the NBA. Getting Young on the cheap for one year was smart, but not using cap room to get ANYONE? Is DC really such a small market that we’ve got to hang on to Lewis so we can be at the cap MINIMUM? I feel for Flip, he’s in a gun fight with a wet noodle.
How long are you going to yell at Dray and JaVale to play defense? What could you get in trade for them? Cap space? Not only are they worthless, together they’re worth even less – and they could make Wall worthless too. Instead of learning from guys who “get it” – Wall is stuck with a guy no one wants and a clown show. I feel bad for N’Daiye (sp?), he could be a useful NBA center if he could play a limited game.
Ticket Prices
If you want D-League prices go on stubhub and get them. You can sit in the lower level for any weekday game for between $10-$20. Enjoy this while it lasts, because now is the time to truly maximize your NBA dollar in DC, especially this year with the condensed season.
by SpecialSauce on Dec 25, 2011 4:16 PM EST up reply actions
I haven't seen many seats at 10-20 in the lower level for most weekday games on stubhub.
today is a holiday, but most prices are at around gate for Stubhub, though some VIP seats are slightly below STH rate in the box.
Wizards charge among the cheapest for tickets in the entire NBA at gate price.
Even Toronto charges prices above or at least around NBA league averages in the lower bowl overall (Canadian to US exchange rate is very close to 1 to 1). Wizards are doing the dynamic pricing for single games too now, but you will never see prices go below STH rate

by 























