Wizards Media Day: Ted Leonsis, Ferraris And Rear-View Mirrors
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Ted Leonsis began his media address prior to the Washington Wizards' 2011/12 media day with an analogy. It probably wasn't the analogy you expected.
"I was watching a docmentary the other day about the founder of the Ferrari racecar," Leonsis said. "He was the first racecar owner and driver to get rid of the rear-view mirror on the car. They asked him why, and he said, 'I don't want anyone looking back. I want my drivers only looking forward.' I think that's an appropriate way to kick off the season."
So that's that. Here are the other most interesting nuggets from his long media session.
On what kind of progress he wants to see this season: "I'm more concerned with process right now than output, though we're here to win. I want to see us winning more games."
On what he told the team today: "I thanked them for being in shape. They took advantage of this extended time and they looked great. That's half the battle."
On fan support: "We're in the top two or three in the NBA in new ticket sales. That's a signal to me that the fans internalize that we're going to build this team the right way and they believe this team has some upside."
On John Wall and leadership: "It's great to see him not be shy and understand that if he leads the pack in terms of running suicide drills, that gives him permission to yell at somebody if he thinks they're not working as hard as he is."
On a conversation he had with Chris Singleton: "I had a conversation with him, and [I said], 'I won't not see that.' I think what happens sometimes to players that can contribute rebounding, playing defense and getting the loose balls and provide energy, maybe sometimes they don't build the stats. They get concerned that they won't be appreciated. I wanted to establish early on that I will appreciate players that help us win."
On making D.C. a destination: "I hope to have our team considered a destination where players want to play, and that'll come from building and buildin. Everyone knows this is a fantastic city. We can get the place rocking with fantastic energy, and we have an environment where they're not just talented players, but they're welcoming, they're embracing of people that join the team. Word will get out that people want to play here."
On JaVale McGee: "I think JaVale is erudite. He's a very, very interesting, next-generation player ... His challenge is playing within himself."
On development: "It's up to us to bring out the best in players. It's not just up to them. It's up to us to develop them, counsel them, coach them and create an environment where they can excel and meet their aspirations."
On media reports of him being a hard-liner during the lockout: "I have to chuckle about the categorizations. There was one meeting that someone close to me had passed away and I had to go to a funeral, so I didn't attend the meeting. I read the next day about how I was a hawk. I hadn't even attended the meeting. We were in a quiet period and you couldn't communicate. There were lots of things that were written where you could look at and say, 'Well, I'd like to set the record straight. I'd like to settle the score.' But that would violate the Ferrari, pull-off-the-rear-view-mirror-and-only-look-forward thing. I think that's in everyone's best interest."
Later: "My biggest issue in all of the negotiations and discussions is about competitiveness. I want to be able to build a team and keep it together."
Even later: "I want to make sure that if we're building around young players -- and I anticipated the new system when I bought the team -- we can keep that team together."
On his team philosophy: "I want to be more loyal to the players I know that we draft, have rough times together, build together and grow, than to strangers."
On the Wizards' future: "We'll wake up in a couple of years with a whole class of players going into their primes and we'll have cap space. That plan is something you have to stick to, because I've seen too many organizations where, if things get tough, they change the plan."
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Did the media buy Leonsis's Ferrari story? Because it's bullshit.
To me, Leonsis said it just so he wouldn’t have to answer questions about his role in the lockout.
- During the lockout? “Oh, I can’t answer that question because the league has insisted that owners not make any comments.”
- After the lockout? “Oh, let me tell you a cute story about Ferraris and only looking forward so that I don’t have to answer questions about the lockout or be accountable.”
Pure bullshit.
by disgrunted on Dec 15, 2011 5:12 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
The ferrari story is from left field
but Ted basically confirmed what I thought during the lockout. He wanted a way for the Wizards to be more competitive more quickly, and a way to keep our young team together if it becomes a good team, but he sounds like he’s more player friendly on economics.
considering that ted has went to the whipping post once to get a public lashing from David Stern
he is scared of doing that again.
“I have to chuckle about the categorizations. There was one meeting that someone close to me had passed away and I had to go to a funeral, so I didn’t attend the meeting. I read the next day about how I was a hawk. I hadn’t even attended the meeting. We were in a quiet period and you couldn’t communicate. There were lots of things that were written where you could look at and say, ‘Well, I’d like to set the record straight. I’d like to settle the score.’
Though yes he did dodge the question
In fairness, like thewiz06 said, part of that is the threat of a fine.
But, it’s like anyone – “transparency” means something different depending on the context and the person’s interest
My point is
That the lockout caused people (players, arena personnel, etc.) to miss paychecks, caused businesses around the arena to temporarily lose business, will cause season ticket holders to have to watch a rushed schedule and watered down product, etc. So I would think that at a minimum Ted should have to explain where he stood on the lockout. What was he pushing for? Why? What role did he play in the negotiations and strategy? Is he happy with the deal? Why or why not? He wanted a hard cap, but the deal doesn’t include one. What does he think about that? Was the lockout worth it? Is he concerned that the rushed and shortened season is going to impact the quality of games, and is he concerned whether that is fair to his customers? Etc., etc., etc., etc., etc.
This whole “Don’t ask the Emperor any questions about the lockout” routine rubs me the wrong way. The NBA and each owner should be answering a lot of questions from fans and their franchises’ communities, particularly the communities where taxpayer dollars have been spent to build arenas, roads, infrastructure, etc. that benefits those franchises.
The one question I would like to ask Ted is:
“You have often said that owning a team like the Wizards is a public trust. How was the lockout consistent with that notion?”
he gets fined by forfeiting our picks if he answers it.
The only rationale I can say (while staying true to the owners’ rhetoric) is this if I was in an owner’s shoes:
Lockouts are made to compel the employees to give an employer more leverage in labor negotiations, but more importantly for the better long term health of a business. Sometimes short term relief by giving a union a too-friendly can hurt the business in the long run and then that means shutting it down.
Granted, there are outside businesses affected by the lockout. But it is better for the nba to have a lockout ending with an economically friendly deal over the long run and competitiveness plays a major factor into that rather than to continue under the last deal and see losses that allow arena employees to get paid in the short run, but also mean that the business will shut down and then these employees have nothing.
If any owner gave a statement like this he will get burned at the stake by many fans. Seems better that he is dodging it.
by thewiz06 on Dec 15, 2011 8:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
what are you reading????
He’s answering the question fine.
by Kenny Sky Walker on Dec 15, 2011 10:01 PM EST up reply actions
i don't think it's just the lockout
that ted wants to put behind him
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 16, 2011 10:58 AM EST up reply actions
Big deal
THIS is what arouses our communal ire?
Let’s save it for something legit, like not going hard enough after a possibly available stud like Dwight Howard …
or the fact that Vesely without ever having played a second and with no real evidence to go on is a certifiable bust and we are cursed — CURSED …
by badinage on Dec 15, 2011 6:44 PM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Guaranteed to raise half the community ire.... by saying
Nick Young is….. (implying a good player)
or
Nick Young is …. (implying a bad player)
I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.
by Rook6980 on Dec 15, 2011 6:51 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs

by 























