Nick Young And The Qualifying Offer: Why It Means He's Probably Gone Next Season
With all the noise about Nick Young potentially signing the qualifying offer to stay with the Wizards and become an unrestricted free agent next season, I feel the need to point out that if that's what ends up happening, it probably means this will be his last year in D.C. Michael Lee listed the 10 players who signed the qualifying offer since the new CBA started in 1999.
Ben Gordon, Raymond Felton, Michael Olowokandi, Stromile Swift, Robert Swift, Mickael Pietrus, Melvin Ely, Vladimir Radmanovic and Rasho Nesterovic are the other players who decided to sign qualifying offers to become unrestricted free agents a year later.
All 10 of those guys saw the writing on the wall: the qualifying offer means the team probably doesn't really want the player long-term. All 10 left the next season. Here's a breakdown of what happened with them.
Ben Gordon
- Signed qualifying offer with Bulls in 2008
- Emerged as starting shooting guard and playoff hero.
- Signed five-year deal with Pistons
Raymond Felton
- Signed qualifying offer with Bobcats in 2009
- Had best season of career.
- Signed two-year deal with Knicks.
Michael Olowokandi
- Signed qualifying offer with Clippers in 2002.
- Played just 36 games
- Signed three-year deal with Timberwolves.
Stromile Swift
- Signed qualifying offer with Grizzlies in 2004.
- Averaged 10/5 for Memphis in 2005.
- Signed four-year contract with Rockets.
- Signed qualifying offer with Sonics in 2008.
- Did not play in the NBA again after 2008/09.
Mickael Pietrus
- Signed qualifying offer with Warriors in 2007.
- Had OK year for Warriors.
- Signed four-year deal with Magic.
Melvin Ely
- Signed qualifying offer with Bobcats in 2006.
- Traded in midseason to Spurs, consented to it.
Vladimir Radmanovic
- Signed qualifying offer in 2005 with Sonics.
- Traded at midseason to the Clippers, consented to it.
- Signed qualifying offer with Timberwolves in 2002.
- Was team's starting center.
- Signed six-year contract with Spurs.
94 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yeah
Always figured the QO was a death knell for Nick as a long-term Wizard
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Dec 14, 2011 12:50 PM EST reply actions
Here's hoping EG at least offers a 5 year, $25 million deal
at the least rather than just let him sign the QO
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Dec 14, 2011 1:03 PM EST up reply actions
Cinnamon
that stuff isn’t going to cut it
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
by Sean Fagan on Dec 14, 2011 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
this has to be a recurring theme during the season
bad play by mcgee or young? cinnamon.
"hindsight is 50-50" - Steve Spurrier
by little stevie colter on Dec 14, 2011 10:54 PM EST up reply actions
I'm fine with the Wiz eventually letting Young walk.
I’ve never been a big fan of Young. He’s got all the physical attributes to be a great but will never put it all together to become a solid, starting shooting guard. He believes he’s a starter and really is best suited to be an off-the-bench, no-conscious scorer (think Vinnie “The Microwave” Johnson), imho.
Unfortunately, I don’t think that’s a role he’ll embrace with the Wizards, but it will be his ultimate role on a good team.
I guess if you like your starting shooting guard averaging 0.4 assists,
0.4 steals and 1.6 rebounds (even though he gets minutes at SF) per game and defensively only being trusted man-to-man, then Nick’s solid.
When Nick’s not scoring, he gives the team next to nothing.
and of course
here comes the talk about lack of assists and rebounds…… completely ignoring the fact that Young out-scores 80% of the Starting Shooting Guards in the League – at an acceptable efficiency – is THE best catch-and-shoot 3-point shooter in the League, and is a very good on-ball defender….
Your starting SG should be able to SHOOT !! So when ANY starting Shooting Guard is not scoring, they are giving their team next to nothing….
I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.
Sorry, Rook. I disagree.
Nick outscores 80% of the shooting guards in the league (I’ll accept your numbers as fact), but is he better or more efficient than the others or is his green light to shoot greener? Young shot 42% from the field last year, 35% on his 3-pts and 67% on his FTs…are those stats better than 80% of the shooting guards in the league too?
As to other SGs not giving you anything when they’re not scoring, I disagree. Clearly, SGs who can assist, rebound, play team defense and/or hit better than 67% of their FTs are giving you SOMETHING.
I looked at the wrong stats
Nick Young last year:
44% FG, 38% 3-pt, 82% FT, 1.8 rebs, 1.0 assists
Several guys managed to match those percentages
But how many managed those percentages with a high usage rate and as their team’s #1 scoring option? Of those, how many played good man D?
The question though is what option is he on the "new" Wizards
Is he the “notorious” third option? Is he the second option after Wall? Can he even be considered a second option when he remains so streaky and disappear for points? Can a second option really not offer anything on the AST or rebounding end?
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
What option is Ray Allen for the Celtics?
Nick can be the first, second, or third option depending on what the defense does. Decision is up to Wall and Flip.
Allen also has better rebounding and assist numbers
I’m not against retaining Nick Young, but there has to be serious consideration as to how much more he is going to evolve as a player. The things he lacks (court vision ect) are the hardest things to improve. It also took Saunders a year to break down his game and build it back up. Again, Nick can be a valuable piece, I’m just not sure that I want the Wizards to overpay or worry overmuch about an NBA SG with such glaring weaknesses.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
by Sean Fagan on Dec 14, 2011 3:21 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
here we are talking about ray allen again
does anyone think we wouldn’t have reupped ray allen for a max deal by now? why does ray allen’s name get mentioned when we talk about nick young?
if you can look at nick young’s stats and see ray allen, that doesn’t speak well for statistical analysis.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 14, 2011 3:28 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Screens!
Shooting! Dopplegangers!
Allen lacks Young’s sweet fro.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
I’m curious what if any long term offer the Wiz have made to NY. Maybe everyone is just waiting for Rip, Jamal Crawford, Aflalo, Stuckey etc. to set the market. Playing under the QO is very risky for Nick – after all he’s only been a starter for about half of one season. Jordan could eclipse him, he could get hurt, it’s possible that Mack could take some of his minutes. It’s not clear that Nick is seen as having that much value to other teams. Let’s say the best offer he gets is from the Wiz at 4 years and $20 – 24 million. I think it would be hard for Nick to pass on that, take $3.4 million and role the dice hoping to do better next year.
I think if we made any
Nick’s agent would have leaked the information by now
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Dec 14, 2011 1:28 PM EST up reply actions
Exactly
That’s what I said yesterday on my Roster Reactions thread. If NY received an offer it would have been made public: the Wizards for PR purposes and NY’s agent for biding purposes.
by SpecialSauce on Dec 14, 2011 1:30 PM EST up reply actions
Not necessarily, its a matter of how you look at it
I accept the evidence detailed above, but the Wizards are a business, and as a business it is in their interests to cut costs as much as possible.
The ideal result for the Wizards business is for Nick to take the qualifying offer and not ask for more. Nicks restricted, so the Wiz can match other offers as they please. Therefore it makes no sense for them to offer more if its not needed, until someone puts in a bid. By picking up his qualifying offer, the Wiz have shown their interest, and put the ball in Nicks court to open negotiations by naming his price.
I agree its not the most enthusiastic or tempting offer ever, but as long as Nick understands the business reasons behind it there’s no reason for him to see it as lack of interest.
The Wiz could make him a higher offer, and they probably have already, but this risks pushing up the bidding war for him unnecessarily. For a team whose trying to preserve cap space, this doesn’t make sense.
by BballBrit on Dec 14, 2011 1:05 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Well, he could still get an offer sheet
Or they could work out something long-term. Or, they could even give him more on a one-year deal so it’s not the QO. Just saying if it ends up being the QO, he’s probably gone next year.
Sure, the Wizards are a business. They are also an NBA franchise, which doesn't always follow the rules of a business...or general sanity.
The ideal result for the Wizards business is for Nick to take the qualifying offer and not ask for more.
As Mike says in the comment above, it means he’s probably gone. No multi-year offer would be correctly perceived by Nick or anyone else as a lack of interest in a league where multi-year contract offers are the order of the day based on what a GM thinks you might do on the court.
I agree the Wiz should continue to sit on their hands, although I hope something along the lines of that 5 year, $25 million contract is in the chamber should no one bid for his services. And of course, Mike was never advocating the Wiz start bidding out of fear of losing him next season.
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Dec 14, 2011 1:27 PM EST up reply actions
That's not the ideal results for the Wizards
The ideal result is a two year deal with a team option in the second year. Then the Wizards could trade Young if he struggles to teams who want to cut cap.
I'm fine with this
I Iike Nick Young, but he’s the kind of guy it’s a lot easier to overpay than underpay.
Stuckey appears headed this route
Stuckey, the Pistons’ top free agent this offseason, is balking at what the team is prepared to pay him. The Pistons have discussed a deal that would pay Stuckey between $40 million and $45 million over five years, according to sources. ESPN
We’re still seeing the aftereffects of the Summer of Lebron. Even though there’s a ton of SGs available salaries are inflated because too many teams have money.
Crab nuggets!
Does the man want $10 million per???
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Dec 14, 2011 1:30 PM EST up reply actions
That's a big offer
I’m surprised he’s not rushing to sign that deal. Stuckey’s nice, but he kind of flat lined after his second season. $8-10 mil is a lot of coin for 15 ppg.
by SpecialSauce on Dec 14, 2011 1:32 PM EST up reply actions
SIGN THAT RIGHT NOW DO NOT DELAY DO NOT MISS THIS PAYDAY
Is Stuckey insane? He’s just slightly above average. He’ll never see that kind of offer again.
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Dec 14, 2011 4:32 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed, Stuckey should sign that ASAP!!!
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Dec 14, 2011 6:35 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed, Stuckey should sign that ASAP!!!
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Dec 14, 2011 6:36 PM EST up reply actions
Ha, suck ISP failure!
Stuckey’s holding out for 10 million per
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Dec 15, 2011 8:11 AM EST up reply actions
I think Stuckey's agent
knows that a pod person replaced Joe Dumars 5 years ago
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Joe Dumars deserves to be fired for that contract
That is ridiculous. I don’t think he’s worth anywhere close to that amount.
by ThePGPhenomenon on Dec 14, 2011 4:35 PM EST up reply actions
Dumars deserved to be fired after Gordon and Villanueva
Now he’s just playing chicken
He also re-signed Prince for some strange reason......
4yrs/$27mill….. After the season they had, he’s making some strange moves.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Dec 14, 2011 6:39 PM EST up reply actions
Cocaine's a helluva drug..
by Bread Lover on Dec 14, 2011 7:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs

Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Dec 14, 2011 7:44 PM EST up reply actions
at this point can the Wizrds withdraw their qualifying offer
If they don’t wanna really offer NY longterm security I don’t want him on this years team messing up things trying to play for a contract with Crawford breathing down his neck taking his pt.
Only way I keep him is if I intend to move him in trade but otherwise its gonna be an uncomfortable situation.
Silly
Nick will be busting his butt because he will be an UNRESTRICTED free agent next year.
No drama. Doing nothing to hurt his ability to maximize his value.
by jmpalomo on Dec 14, 2011 1:55 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
PLUS his trade value sky rockets as the trade deadline approaches
Win- Win for everyone as far as Im concerned.
by jmpalomo on Dec 14, 2011 1:57 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Exactly
This is the best way to handle this. Young hasn’t always proved to be the most motivated guy. If you sign him to a long term deal now, you don’t know how he’ll react on the floor. But if you keep that carrot in front of him, you know you’ll get a hard worker. And since you have another guy who can play the same position effectively, dangling him out there on the trading block can only help your team. Now, if he proves to have great chemistry now with JW, and has worked on his deficiencies, then you ink him long term during the season.
Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.
A Team Option
Is just as effective to achieve this.
yeah and crawford is gonna sit back and not take his minutes outperform him and not let up on him one aiota in practice
NY’s need to get his numbers and the Wizards need to play the right way could be in conflict even Wall suggested last year that the team didn’t play as a team played too selfishly in an interview earlier in the week.
I’d love to see Crawford and Young in the same backcourt. That would be some crazy basketball. Wouldn’t win many games, but it would be spectacular.
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Dec 14, 2011 4:49 PM EST up reply actions
If not him, then who?
The problem is, next summer, there is almost nothing available at SG, except for a couple RFAs. So if you lose Young, you have Crawford and whomever you draft. Unless we’re lucky to be drafting very high, that could be a problem. Paying young 6 or 7 mil a year for 4 years, if he’s willing to take it, is probably more beneficial to us than being forced into possibly paying him 9+ next season.
8 mil or less per year for a SG in his mid 20s that can show up on defense, and score 16+ points a game for you mostly from the outside, is also a tradable asset. So you’re not screwing yourself over by signing him.
This is premature...
As I said in re PG Phenomenon’s previous post on this subject, we should regard the QO as a placeholder at this point. Why bid against ourselves?
If Nick gets another offer, as was the case with the Clips and DeAndre Jordan, the likelihood is that EG will match it (the money will be nowhere close to what Jordan got, of course… and you cannot really compare Nick to Stuckey, who is a combo guard while Nick is a pure 2). Even if Nick does not get an offer, my guess is that EG also knows the boundaries of QO hell that you carefully delimited above, Mike, and for that reason will make Nick an offer that saves face all around.
We all need to remember a few things about Nick (apart from the elements of his game that we have been picking at like a Roman auger examining chicken entrails). My read of Nick is that behind the goofiness there is a lot of pride, self-respect and patience. Nick was the last man in the Green Room (like Rashard before him, maybe we are specializing in guys like this), and he waited three years to get a crack at starter’s minutes. He has given the Wizards their money’s worth to date, his game is still developing (within its limits), and I do not foresee us hanging him out to dry in QO country.
Maybe I am prejudiced because I saw Nick shoot the lights out against LA at Staples Center last year, but this guy is no Vlad Radmanovic.
that was eloquent I wish NY's game was as eloquent.
we don’t need him Crawford may be better. I just see problems within the team if NY comes back Crawford is brash alittle bit of a loose cannon very passionate its why I believe we played much better with crawford than with NY because whatever crazy that is Crawford it inspires and fires up teammates. Its passion really NY is alittle aloof and kinda goofy and doesn’t pass. I can see these 2 guys butting heads.
We can always find sg depth in any draft. I just don’t know what NY’s number is right now.
Free agency almost seems frozen right now with the Dwight and Cp3 saga’s going on.
I love Crawford
And I don’t really MIND him starting, but I’ve always felt he’s best suited as the third guard off the bench. He’s shown he can handle either guard position, and he’s also shown that he can come in cold off the bench and light it up. Obviously he can be a spot starter if necessary, but the ideal place for him is the first seat on the bench.
Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.
by CJHutch on Dec 14, 2011 5:24 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
My thoughts exactly sir. rec'd
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Dec 14, 2011 6:41 PM EST up reply actions
Didn't said he's going to get the QO
Still plenty of time for another option. Just saying if he gets the QO, he’s probably gone.
stuckey better than nick young?
That’s funny! Well that just goes to show that dc fans never miss anyone till they’re gone! Nick is an elite scoring gaurd, showed consistency and some maturity last year. Yes, he has a ways to go but his ceiling is way higher than stuckey’s LOL!
by Objdadon on Dec 14, 2011 1:57 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Sigh
A player that has never had a PER above average in his entire career is not “Elite.” He has been a below average player according to that metric.
Even people who like NY’s game argue that he’s evolving into an elite SG based upon his EFG and low turnover numbers.
It's a total power play
This is a classic example of a player getting a spoonful of salt when expecting sugar.
NY wanted to see what his value was, the market has showed him the brutal reality, and now Nick is in a real tough place to decide his financial future, despite coming off of a career year.
He now will have to choose between signing the QO in DC and seeing if next summer is more fruitful, yet at the same time knowing that the team will be developing Crawford into their SG of the future or he can sign a multi year deal in DC, perhaps 4 years at $20 mil, and seeing where these Wizards can go with him in the mix.
$20 mil is a lot more guaranteed then $3.7 is. Nick’s watched what’s happened to Gil. He knows that opportunities to get paid in this league are limited.
Yep and E.G. is doing the right thing by waiting from a business standpoint for the Wizards
Nick had the right to do what’s best for him (explore his market value coming of a career year) and Ernie has to do what’s right for the franchise. Neither party should be salty about that imho.
Nick has been a little unfortunate with the way this free agency is playing out so far and it might turn out to be in his best interest to sign with the Wiz for 4yrs/$20mill or something similar.
FA isn’t over though, so stuff can happen and the cards may fall differently for Nick than they now seem to be falling.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Dec 14, 2011 6:55 PM EST up reply actions
Clippers are definitely offering NY a contract in my view
After that trade they gave up EG on
by Young Wook Lee on Dec 14, 2011 8:22 PM EST up reply actions
You may have something there.
Right now they have a great backcourt (Paul, Billups, Mo Williams, Eric Bledsoe) that is nonetheless vertically challenged. Nick, the ultimate LA Guy, as a Clip makes sense.
What does Ernie do if the Clips offer Nick? I would say match the offer and trade him for Eric Bledsoe and a second rounder. Reuniting Bledsoe and Wall would be cool, and Nickwill be terrific as the third option with the Clips.
I think Clippers only have exception
Used last of cap space for Billups (asuming trade did not make change though).
Maybe EG isn't 100% sure himself what he thinks of Nick.
Surly Ernie knows way more about what to look for in a developing SG than myself and most of us on this site. But we as a community seem so divergent in our views on Nick, that perhaps EG has some of those same question marks and isn’t quite sure if he is ready to commit to Nick.
It's just a waiting game
I think the Wizards will make a multi-year offer to Nick, but it is in their best interest to wait as long as possible. Obviously the offers for Nick are not pouring in yet, so he must be getting antsy about that. As the season gets closer, the offers are going to get lower. So if Nick does get an offer sheet, they can match and if not, they can offer Nick a decent but not extravagant 4 year deal. If I remember correctly, they did this same thing with Deshawn Stevenson.
I also believe that the Wizards had La Bomba
to use as leverage against Stevenson. Though my timing on that may be incorrect.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
At the end of the day
I think both the market and the desire for a culture change are going to see Nick on his way out of town.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
I think the organization is thinking about moving on without him
This culture change aspect should not be marginalized. NY is still part of the “old guard” of Gil-influenced players and I think the powers that be want to send him on his way, which is something I’m not sure so I agree with some a purely basketball sense for the reasons listed here. Then again when it comes to those important “intangibles” I think Crawford has the upper hand. While NY seems to be a laid back guy who likes having fun, Crawford seems like a hyper-competitive killer who will bust his ass to pieces to win games. This team needs an influx of that sort of thinking. Being loose and laid back didn’t get us anywhere before.
by Ron Carlos Jeines on Dec 14, 2011 3:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Nick is a hard worker
He can be a goof on & off the court, but don’t let his personality fool. Just look at how much he improved last season. Why does he have to be moved to change the culture? He’s not the problem.
Formerly know as iNFamous SWaGG
No doubt he’s a hard worker and talented guard. But the Wiz also know he’s a chucklehead and not a winner. Does anyone think he’s bothered for 10 seconds by a loss?
by ReturnofBillyJOe on Dec 14, 2011 4:35 PM EST up reply actions
He gets unfairly casted with other goofballs
but he has done nothing to deserve that criticism.
by ThePGPhenomenon on Dec 14, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
Now now
lets not forget the belt whipping episode. Which was just weird.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Spoonfuls of cinnamon aside?
Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.
are you trying to get my hopes up mike?
and sean too for that matter
still premature… but early signs are promising!
by DarrellWalkerFan on Dec 14, 2011 3:24 PM EST reply actions
How long does he have before reporting?
I think he’ll get a 4 year deal and after no interest from anyone else he’ll jump on it.
Does the QO expire?
If he plays under the QO then he’ll be playing his butt off to get mo money next year. Problem being he won’t know where he’ll end up or gets injured and his value goes in the toilet.
I’d like to see him stay. I just don’t see any available SG that can help us like he will.
Why would anyone think this leadership wanted Nick Young around
at every turn the seem to imply that they want him out the door…
I guess it is time to hope two guards under 6’ 5" can be a legit NBA backcourt without one being any type of shooter…
Good luck with that plan….I guess we are on a 4 year plan…hope it doesn’t backfire and cause John to walk…..
Crawford is also bad for Wall's development
Playing with Nick, Wall puts up 15 pts and 10 asts.
Playing with Jordan, Wall puts up 20 pts and 6 asts.
Personally, I’d rather have the next Stockton or Kidd instead of the next Steve Francis.
Agreed, Nick is the better fit
Nick’s offense is within the flow of the offense, curling of screens for the catch and shoot, camping in the corner for the catch and shoot 3 and running with Wall on the break, either cutting for the dish-and-slam or fading for the 3pt kick out. In addition to his offense he is pretty big at 6’7 and athletic too. Except for maybe Hinrich and Evans, Nick was our best on ball perimeter defender last year.
People who still think Nick is chucking up shots on a green light should think about this: Nick Young was the best (most efficient) catch and shoot player in the ENTIRE LEAGUE from range.
Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
by Dutch Hoopfan on Dec 14, 2011 6:47 PM EST up reply actions
Nick Young is not the difference
In Wall’s career turning into John Stockton or Jason Kidd (TERRIBLE comparisons by the way) or Francis.
I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.
Follow @Dylan___V
by returnofswagger on Dec 14, 2011 6:51 PM EST up reply actions
NY percieved value
I’d guess Nick’s agent is seeking 7M-8M, since Marcus Thornton a 2G with similar #’s just signed for 8 mil per (40mil/5yr) with Sacramento.
Has Chicago found their SG yet?
Where else is going to offer NY a big contract?
I am happy to have Nick for one more year playing with Wall and Crawford to see how they fit together. And right now, management cannot decide how much to offer him – thhey have learned NOT to overpay.
Totally unrelated but check this out....
.

Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back! - David Aldridge
What seems to be the officer, problem? - Randy Marsh
Yep
dropped 32 pounds, working out several hours each morning or some such…that injury he suffered in the 2010 Finals kept him from being in best possible shape…and now we know what that is…I mean, jeebus…
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Dec 15, 2011 8:14 AM EST up reply actions
Now he'll get pushed around in the post because he wont have a big butt to move people out
Haha. Butt it is a possibility.

by 























