Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Russell Westbrook and Kevin Durant's Post-Game 5 Outfits

NBA Free Agency: Can The Wizards Offer Nick Young A Nick Collison-Like Contract Extension?

BNIE's post today on Nick Young got me curious, in particular because of one thing he wrote.  In talking about the importance of re-signing Young, BNIE suggested the Wizards could give Young an extension similar to the wacky one Nick Collison received with the Oklahoma City Thunder (and, to a lesser extent, Andray Blatche received after the 2009/10 season). 

Reflexively, it means there's little chance we'll lose Nick Young unless someone overbids recklessly. We should be able to outbid any offer from an opposing team by frontloading the deal a la the Trail Blazers. But the model I'm really lookinig to copy is Nick Collison's deal with the Thunder, authored by Sam Presti.

Can the Wizards actually do this, though?  Did the new CBA close this loophole?  I looked into it a bit and found that, yes, the Wizards should be able to do it, provided the following things happen:

(Thanks to Larry Coon for help on this).

Star-divide

Background: Nick Collison's contract

For the sake of accuracy, here's what the Thunder did with Nick Collison. 

  • Gave him a five-year, $24 million contract with the following per-year breakdown: $13.27 million in 2010/11, $3.27 million in 2011/12, $2.9 million in 2012/13, $2.5 million in 2013/14 and $2.24 million in 2014/15.  That's a standard front-loaded contract with declining salaries that fit into the 8.5-percent raises/drops in contracts.  The only exception is taking a lot of that money and dumping it all into the first year because they had that much cap space.
  • The idea is: if you have a team under the cap, you can re-sign a player and give him a "signing bonus" that puts you up to the salary cap.  In essence, the Thunder gave Collison a one-year, $13 million deal, then a four-year, $11 million deal. This is only available to teams under the salary cap.
  • To the best of Coon's knowledge, this loophole has not been closed.  I too haven't seen it in the new CBA.

The Wizards' current situation

The Wizards will have some cap space, according to my calculations.  But that doesn't include cap holds (a salary slot that's 150-300 percent of a player's salary placed there until the team acts on the player) or qualifying offers.  Here's the two ways the Wizards could give Young a Collison-like extension.

If the Wizards use the Amnesty Clause on Rashard Lewis...

This becomes a lot easier.  Using the Amnesty Clause on Lewis would free up $21 million from the Wizards' cap number.  Without cap holds and qualifying offers, the Wizards would have $36 million in cap room.  The Wizards would have to remove only a couple cap holds to get under the cap and be able to do this.

If the Wizards don't use the Amnesty Clause on Rashard Lewis...

This process becomes a lot harder, but it's still doable.  When you include all the Wizards' cap holds and qualifying offers, the total team salary goes to $80 million.  That's only for the purposes of signing free agents -- it doesn't mean the Wizards have no cap room.  It just means they need to renounce several of these cap holds before making a subsequent move with their cap room.  The downside is that those players renounced suddenly are cast into the free-agent pool, and the Wizards don't get exclusive Bird Rights on them.

Here's the path to creating cap room to give Young a signing bonus.

  • Renounce Yi Jianlian: The Wizards already declined to give him a qualifying offer, and his cap hold is $12.1 million.  No reason to keep that around.  We're down to $68.1 million.
  • Young's own cap hold ($7.9 million) goes away.  Down to $60.1 million.
  • Renounce either Maurice Evans or Josh Howard, or both: Their cap holds are $6 million and $5 million, respectively.  Cutting one gets the Wizards slightly under the salary cap; cutting both gets them $9 million under, giving them some wiggle room.  It means the Wizards will have a much tougher time keeping either, but I don't know if they want to keep those two anyway.
  • Remove qualifying offers to Othyus Jeffers and Larry Owens: That'll clear up another $2 million.
  • Renounce Mustafa Shakur and Cedric Jackson: That'll clear up another $1.7 million.

That all puts the Wizards at $12.7 million below the cap, technically.  From there, the Wizards can give Young a contract paying up to that much in the first year. 

Of course, even if they can do that, it doesn't mean they will do that.  They have more players they need to sign, and Young himself has to agree to it.  But that's the path to a wacky Young contract extension that could drive his price down in future years, when better free agents will be available.

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Now

Is EG creative enough to pull this off?

I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.

by returnofswagger on Nov 29, 2011 1:14 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Excellent research. Somebody with access send an email to Ernie!!

I will be very pleased if we do this and then fill up the roster with D-league players on one-year contracts. Potentially setting us up for a big trade around draft time, if we like.

by Tbonebullets on Nov 29, 2011 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

Great Post

I think it’s obvious that the future cap space is well worth giving up on some veterans we don’t really need and some D-League level guys.

by Scizzy on Nov 29, 2011 1:26 PM EST reply actions  

So really it boils down to

Is frontloading his contract worth parting ways with Evans, Howard, and Jeffers? Or, more precisely, do they have any desire to keep either Evans or Howard? Jeffers will probably be cheap enough to fit in there some kind of way.

by jones-y on Nov 29, 2011 1:29 PM EST reply actions  

Sjamon man, just sign this man...... AU!!

.
80’s Nick Young

Pic is from DeShawn Stevenson’s 80’s themed birthday party. Here’s a video from the party containing a clip of Nick in his fly members only jacket doing a short Michael Jackson dance routine.

Who won? Who lost? Who cares?! The NBA is Back!
David Aldridge

by Dutch Hoopfan on Nov 29, 2011 1:37 PM EST reply actions  

The sad thing about this picture.....

Is that this is really his hair.

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 29, 2011 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

One can only hope.

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 29, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Are there any limits to the size of the signing bonus?

In theory, could we amnesty Rashard and then use all of our cap space to re-sign Nick at $30-some million this year, then the minimum for the rest of his contract?

by yop32 on Nov 29, 2011 2:14 PM EST reply actions  

Great Write-Up

All those players you listed with capholds are as good as gone. The only player we probably thought about keeping was Jeffers and he tore his ACL. Sucks because I really liked his energy. But anyway, looks like we will be to pull off a Collison type move to an extent. I would also like to bring in a quality backup BIG so there I don’t see how we could frontload it as extreme as the Thunder did. No way we use our Amnesty just so we can pull this move, so it will be more difficult but still doable. Are we $13 mil under the cap before or after our draft picks are signed?

by jeffco01 on Nov 29, 2011 2:29 PM EST reply actions  

Anyone concerned we might create an Albert Haynesworth situation?

Seems like a pretty substantial risk to front-load so much money, at least from a motivational stand point.

by thrill_house on Nov 29, 2011 2:31 PM EST reply actions  

But at the same time...

If we give him most of the money upfront, then, even if he plays poorly later, we only took a major loss in the first year of his contract. The later years won’t impact us as much.

Plus, if Wall is a good leader, he should be able to keep Nick Young motivated.

by DCSportsAllDay on Nov 29, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

It’s not even really that much of a loss. We need to spend this money on somebody this year. So if the money were invested in locking up Nick for cheap, long term, then that’s probably worth it.

I'm a Wizards fan. We've been trying to tell you about Lebron for years. Hated the man before it was cool.

by returnofswagger on Nov 29, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Definitely like the outside the box thinking...

Just want to make sure we get the most bang for a buck out of NY if we resign him.

by thrill_house on Nov 29, 2011 2:39 PM EST reply actions  

afflalo

i’ve seen some of you throw around numbers like 4 years 5 mil for nick….if nick is worth 5 mil, then what is afflalo worth?…in my mind (as well as many “experts”) afflalo is the MUCH better player…and even he will not get a contract for more than 7 mil a year…i’d rather have afflalo at 5-7 mil a year than nick at 5

by jasonj on Nov 29, 2011 2:55 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Afflalo is better, but there isn't a huge gulf between them.

As for the “experts” opinions on Nick, they are of two distinct types. There are the ones who actively keep up with players and their progression, and there are others who do a writeup once and trot it out year after year.

by jones-y on Nov 29, 2011 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree - Afflalo is the better player...

He’s a better defender… better 3-point shooter , which means he has a terrific TSP (62% last year)… good finisher on the break….

He’s STILL not a great assist or rebound guy – and he doesn’t go to the rim… can’t dribble…. and like Young, he doesn’t get to the foul line much.

Like Jones-y says, he’s better than Young – but not by leaps and bounds

I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.

by Rook6980 on Nov 29, 2011 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you think there's any loss of incentive for a player if their salary is on the decline over the life of their contract?

I’m not sure that there is, I’m just thinking out loud. It’s such an unusual way to structure a contract.

by satchmore on Nov 29, 2011 3:07 PM EST reply actions  

I think that sinking that much money into Nick for one year is a mistake

Especially if it comes at the cost of our D-League guys or more depth. The point of the OKC move was to lock Collison down for that year before everyone else’s contract blew up. I’m not sure that this can be applied successfully to the Wizards.

The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.

by Sean Fagan on Nov 29, 2011 4:35 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

It's not apples to apples, but it's not strawberries to bananas either

JWall and McGee are going to need extending down the line (JVM sooner, obviously). Future cap space will be valuable, especially if we use the space that we think is coming next year on a big “get.” I believe that Nick can be a valuable contributor on a successful team. BNiE and Rook have crunched all the numbers detailing how much Nick has progressed and how he actually DOES fit what we’re trying to do. No, Nick will never be an elite rebounder or passer. But he’s a SHOOTING GUARD. Not every shooting guard is DWade. Nick does one thing at an elite level that nobody else on the team can do all that well – shoot. Shooting will ALWAYS be valuable in the NBA. If we’re going to spend the money, I think it makes total sense to do it this way – BUT only so long as Nick buys in too. If the front office talks to him about this and senses any kind of reservation about being way overpaid one year and then way underpaid for 3-4 years, I wouldn’t do this deal. Unhappy players lead to poor play.

by jakenbake on Nov 29, 2011 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I also think we have to be realistic about the likelihood of a big "get" in free agency...

…for example, RealGM had a line today stating that the Celts and the Clips are going after Dwight Howard next year. And of course the Lakers (the likely destination, imo) will, too. Plus throw in the fact that we don’t exactly have a stellar record of signing truly great free agents. If past is prologue, they won’t want to come here. So we have to be creative.

I still think Lewis is going to be a nice trade chip next offseason; his buyout offers true cap savings even without amnesty for any team that owns him. So maybe we can use him to facilitate Howard going elsewhere. But who would we be likely to get? Do you want Bynum? Pau Gasol? An old Garnett?

I’d be interested in limiting our free agent signings so that we see how well our current talent can play. If the team ends up playing well together without any veteran help, that may be the only way we could even potentially sign Dwight Howard.

by Tbonebullets on Nov 29, 2011 5:41 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Can we sign another team's free agent this way?

Or does this only work with an extension? How about as part of a sign and trade?

by yop32 on Nov 29, 2011 4:53 PM EST reply actions  

Can we sign Yound without turning it in to a cotroversy?

Maybe Detroit will release Hamilton and the Wiz will offer.

by hambonejackson on Nov 29, 2011 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Controversy? I think we should also extend Yi this way.

Athletic seven footer who works hard and can shoot from outside. There’s always a chance he can put it together. As long as it doesn’t screw up our cap situation, I would definitely keep him.

I have now proposed keeping Yi and adding Oden. Between JaVale, N’Diaye, Oden, and Yi, one or two of them is bound to turn out to be a real center, right?

by yop32 on Nov 30, 2011 7:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Declined his QO doesn’t mean we renounced him, right? As long as he is a hold on our cap, we should be able to give him a Collison-esque signing bonus, no?

by yop32 on Nov 30, 2011 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

He also injured his knee in China

I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.

by Rook6980 on Nov 30, 2011 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

You have to be kidding...

You are still on that Yi bandwagon. I just don’t think his game translates to the NBA style. He’ll be great overseas, but he doesn’t have the mindset to be an effective NBA player.

by ThePGPhenomenon on Nov 30, 2011 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Ghanaouturuguaytrough_small M. Katz

Small Jeff Newman

Small jkahn15

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

402135_2504659589329_1638181922_1758918_1004201176_n_small Bullet Nation in Exile