Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yu Darvish Diagnosed With Mariners Fever

The Flip Side: Establishing the Head Coach's Area of Responsibility

The only thing that seems to get bemoaned more than Andray Blatche and his love of contested jumpshots is Flip and the choices he makes on the hardwood, and off.  There's been a lot of point and counterpoint on what merits his faults and successes.  I want to try and get the criteria we measure him by down in one place.  If you feel I've missed anything, I want to hear about it.  And from time to time, I'll publish an irregular feature on Flip and the progress he seems to be making with the team.

Gripes are presented in no particular order, as everyone has one near and dear to their hearts.  We'll kick things off with preferential treatment for 'veterans' at the expense of playing time for developing youth.  By and large, this means Andray Blatche, Yi Jianlian, and Hilton Armstrong logging perhaps more minutes than they should have at the expense of Javale McGee, Trevor Booker and Kevin Seraphin.  There are arguments aplenty on what's justified and what isn't, but we'll save that for the inaugural cut of The Flip Side.  Mike is partial, as am I, to five-man unit stats, and we'll label that a holistic approach to in-game lineups.  Who's working together, and who isn't.  Substitution patterns will find their home here as well.  The first category looks to deal with balancing playing time, with plenty of subcategories.  More below the jump, and again, any further categories/subcategories you want to see, list 'em.

Star-divide

Scheming is the bread and butter of super villains and head coaches, so no temperature check would be complete without talking about whether or not our resident chess master should take up checkers.  Whether it's switching to the hyperbolic parabaloid transitional floating zone when an opposing team's shooters are lighting us up like a Montecristo or wondering why Andray Blatche can't get back in rhythm, the tacks he's taking take their lumps in this category.

Abraham Lincoln said, "If I was given eight hours to chop down a tree, I would spend six hours sharpening my ax."  No one here makes the mistake of ignoring what happens between games, unfortunately this is where we're often reduced to guess work as to what's going on.  Whether it's who needs extra conditioning before getting on the floor, to how the team prepares its game plan, to the energy level in practices, game time preparation crosses all of our minds every time an opposing coach makes an adjustment and the Wiz fall flat.

Mystique is not a word that comes to mind when you look at Flip Saunders, but it is important for any coach who has to play 'The Rookie Whisperer'.  One observer's 'bashing players in the media' is another observer's 'telling it like it is' and in any environment where emotions are running high, the interpretation of press statements, courtside reactions, and player outbursts belong in the mystique category.  What Flip is telling the team they're trying to accomplish and how he's promoting it are crucial to understanding what's coming out of the Wizards' camp.

To sum up, here's a quick rundown of what the categories are shaping up as:

  • Balancing Act- playing time, substitution patterns, trusting the bench, preferential veteran treatment, five man units that stand out.
  • Schemes - what tricks are working, is Flip looking like Machiavelli or Mumm-ra?
  • Game-time Readiness - for 'what the hell are they doing out there' syndrome, and you can never have too many GtR acronyms.
  • Mystique - You have a plan, right?  Tell me there's a plan.

What's the upshot of all this?  We have a lot of back and forth, and the thought is that maybe establishing a common language will lead to a community consensus, or at the very least, cut down on the rehashing of the same old sentiments.  And who knows, if we can all agree about one thing, maybe Ted will notice.

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

re: schemes

Can we steal Doc’s playbook? I get jealous watching the Cs, clearly executing schemes on both sides of the floor. And before someone says they have the talent to do it and we don’t….Nate was a chucklehead before he went to Boston and now he’s out there in the system. Their 2nd unit plays as tight as their first, every player has bought in and executes what Doc wants.

by DCrez on Jan 28, 2011 9:39 AM EST reply actions  

if that wasnt Flip oriented enough...

I’ll throw in that it’s disconcerting to hear Phil describe our offense as “the exact same stuff he was running in Minnesota” or to hear Grant Hill say that we run “the exact same play” again and again

by DCrez on Jan 28, 2011 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I wonder if he will blame that on the team
Grant Hill say that we run "the exact same play" again and again

which in turn I would blame on Flip. Work harder.

by DavidDunn on Jan 28, 2011 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

The guy running the scheme is a rookie

So 1. he doesn’t know the full playboook in order for Flip to be able to throw some wrinkles. And 2. Everyone around his is also young and learning (among other things) the playbook.

Its not as simple as saying they should run a different play. Its a learning process for everyone involved, including Flip. Perhaps if the were a group of ten year vets interspersed with solid role players and had 4 years to learn the system, then a comparison to Boston would be fair.

Phil is a lot more vocal this year. Mr. ‘agenda man’ doing nothing more than lining up a spot in the broadcast booth. Lots of teams run variations on the hawk offense. So any coach with any amount of experience sees this offense 40 times a year. So he’s really saying nothing.

It all comes down to executing. The PG is a rookie and the rest of the team is young as well. As they learn and gain experience with the basic sets, Flip will then have the ability to open up the playbook a little more.

by jones-y on Jan 28, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Good point...

It seems like the Utah Jazz only have one play…. Pick-and-roll

I don’t think it matters one bit how many plays you know… or how many variations there are… if you can execute ONE play really well, that’s all you really need.

He's "delightfully cranky"

I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.

by Rook6980 on Jan 28, 2011 8:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Something I used to tell my students...

Well-rounded is good, to a point. You can take what you do passably and make it good, or take what you do well and make it great. That greatness will come to define in ways being merely good never can

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jan 29, 2011 8:13 AM EST up reply actions  

I would say one defense to that is

considering whether a team has a majority of chuckleheads or nons. It’s so much easier to get one chucklehead to fall in line when everyone else is already there than to mold a group of chuckleheads into something non-chuckleheadish.

Beyond that, I don’t think of Nate as a not-bright player – he was a guy that was never forced to reign it in, but did have a capacity to learn. I’m not sold on a couple of our players having a very high capacity to learn a lot of intricacies.

by wjb1492 on Jan 28, 2011 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

are you saying our players are dumb?

I think players in general get a bad rap in that area, and most especially nba players. Lots of assumptions thrown around about their capacity to learn etc etc. My feeling is that every player on the team (unless language is an issue) understands Flip’s schemes better than any person writing or commenting about them.

Executing said schemes is another matter entirely…

by DCrez on Jan 28, 2011 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't think every player does (on our team specifically) understand the schemes

I think many are incredibly smart at basketball, and I think many more learn a ton over time (in the NBA in general).

I’m not trying to generalize – I teach for a living, and I understand there is a wide range of capacity to learn in any group. I have some students who work their butts off to pass, but simply can’t grasp some semi-complex concepts or pick up nuances. (And no, I don’t teach rocket science. Or math.) There are people who can’t understand why something is a mistake even after it is explained to them.

So in a sense, I have more faith in a couple of players’ ability to execute basketball in general than I do in their ability to learn a complex scheme, particularly at this point.

by wjb1492 on Jan 28, 2011 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Doc was uniformly considered an awful coach

and thought to be on his way out of town prior to the Big 3 arriving. He was thought to be too much of a player’s coach and it was questioned whether he could manage Garnett and Co.

We should all remember that everything is a whole lot easier when you have veterans who are used to winning on a team.

The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.

by Sean Fagan on Jan 28, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

No he wasnt.

Definitely on his way out of town, but “uniformly considered an awful coach” is way overboard.

by DCrez on Jan 28, 2011 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes Bill Simmons use to wax Doc regulalry...

The thing is, Doc had serious NBA player creds… and Phil Jackson has won his fistfuls of rings as both a coach AND a player… This I think matters to the players, to say nothing of management, the media and fans.

Now I don’t think Pop had that kind of pedigree, but he has won his coaching spurs, as it were, in many other ways.

Flip was a decent starting PG on a good Big Ten team, and owes his career to the guy who he got the ball to on that team, McHale. He was blessed with Garnett in Minnesota and he inherited a Larry Brown-coached championship team in Detroit.

I think Doc and Phil and Pop would have gotten more out of this team that Flip has… maybe 3 – 6 more wins… There is no question this team has its flaws and that Flip had done more for Nick Young and possibly even Wall than a lot of other coaches would have…. That’s why I come down with those who say he is a middling good coach and replacing him at this stage would cause some angst and not much else.

by khrabb on Jan 28, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Doc is a better coach than Flip.

That is pretty obvious based on how he handles his players. There is NO WAY that blatche would get away with his effort level under Doc.

In fairness to Flip though, no way to know how much Ernie contributes to that dynamic

by DCrez on Jan 28, 2011 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Please

Prior to the arrival of the Big 3, Doc Rivers was know to get roughly 40-43 wins out of his Orlando teams, which had Tracy McGrady on them at the peak of his powers. The only time that Rivers coached his way to a decent team was with the 2004-2005 Celtics. He then promptly nosedived out of the playoffs until the arrival of Allen and Garnett. As for discipline. there were tons of questions over player development re:Perkins, Jefferson ect. while Doc was coaching the team.

Interesting how those questions disappear when two HOFers walk through the door.

Great talent makes coaches look great. Phil Jackson had MJ and now Kobe. Pop has Duncan. If you put Doc Rivers on this team, you would see the same results.

The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.

by Sean Fagan on Jan 28, 2011 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

So why bother hiring Flip at all?

Since apparently it makes no difference, and players determine everything. The Blatche situation alone is a drag on this team that Flip is failing to address, and clearly there are some other coaches out there who would.

by DCrez on Jan 28, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

The coach obviously has an impact on a playoff team in important situations.

And in player development. Flip is failing at some things here, but it’s not like we expected Flip to screw up the Blatche situation, or the Blatche situation to be a problem to begun with.

I am going to keep cheering Gil, like it is 2005. Lets see some of that swag return, because that is why we loved you to begin with.

by returnofswagger on Jan 28, 2011 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Overall

most coaches have little to no impact on the performance of their teams. Players cause wins, not coaches. Only a select few, Phil Jackson being first among them, actually improve their teams.

by zl on Jan 28, 2011 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

That's hilarious

You pick the guy who coached the three most dominant players of their eras as your example.

by MR on Jan 28, 2011 8:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah seriously

If anything, coaches are responsible for bringing composure, strategy, and improvement to their team.

This goes even more so for successful teams than the bad ones.

I am going to keep cheering Gil, like it is 2005. Lets see some of that swag return, because that is why we loved you to begin with.

by returnofswagger on Jan 29, 2011 12:13 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd like to see a long-term development/improvement category, too

I mean, that is our primary concern, right? We keep saying we’re OK with losing if the team just plays better.

I think your categories can incorporate this on a team level – e.g., are we adding any new wrinkles, are 5-man units that work together getting time together – but maybe something that looks at individual players under Flip and how they have progressed?

by wjb1492 on Jan 28, 2011 10:25 AM EST reply actions  

I think that'll be covered on and off through all four

But I like giving it extra focus…maybe something along the lines of ‘is the future a place we’d like to be’ kind of category…

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jan 28, 2011 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I can see how it's implicated

I guess I just want to make sure both individual and team development get hit upon – for example, Flip might be “encouraged” to play guys for evaluation, like Kevin, and it appears that the team overall hasn’t developed but either Kevin has or we’ve learned he’s not a piece going forward.

by wjb1492 on Jan 28, 2011 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Individual Skills Development

I like where your going with that wjb, Flip says that he loves the “teaching” aspect of coaching. Well, are they improving individually in their A) Understanding of the game and B) Execution of the game. I guess B comes from A, so their improvement as players should be tops for a team so young, right?

Example, Is JaVale defending the pick and roll better than he did at the beginning of the season? If so, then what Flip and his staff are teaching is getting through.

Thanks for giving us the chance to provide some constructive input, this is a great idea!

by Skins_Fan_47 on Jan 28, 2011 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

The categories are ok...

but if we are going to be management consultants to Ted we need to sound like management consultants. Even if we won’t get paid like McKinsey, we might at least be paid more attention.

“Schemes” translates into “Game Strategy” … It is the theoretical aspect of head coaching or making war, for that matter. How do we deploy the team to have the best chance to win the game? Is there a plan? Is it clear? Does it represent the state of the art? Is it guided by good intelligence and research?

Game time readiness is basically “Game Preparation” … How does the coach we train the team so they will execute the strategy? Does he have the right staff of trainers and drills? Are they teaching the right techniques?

“Balancing Act” translates into “Game Tactics and Management” … How does the coach make adjustments based on real time experience during the game? Does he know when to maintain pressure? Call for a temporary pull back? Bring in fresh manpower?

Mystique is “Leadership” … Does the team really buy into the coach? Will they follow him into battle? Accept his criticisms? Go the extra mile? Is he taken seriously by his players and his management? Is he recognized as a master in his field?

IMO, Flip comes out pretty much middling at best on any of these critieria. Sack him now? Probably not. The known talent pool (i.e. the usual suspects) is not terrific. But by the same token, management needs to sit down with Flip and set realistic goals and milestones relative to all the criteria.

Meh… Go out and give OKC a good game tonight Wizards… Do not let them run you into the ground. Outperform them where they are weaker (Center, Shooting Guard). Put a live body on Durant… Hmmmmm how about Booker at the 3 for defense and Shard at the 4 where Jeff Green is not all that physical and likes to go outside himself…. And don’t let Wall frustrate himself to death trying to contain Westbrook for 40+ minutes, keep fresh waves of PGs coming at him.

by khrabb on Jan 28, 2011 10:41 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I do, for another.

Part of my intent here is create definitions for common complaints, so that if and when we refute them, they stay that way.

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jan 28, 2011 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

I just don’t understand what people see in Kevin Seraphin, he had one good game in lakers game, that is it.

by jackever1 on Jan 28, 2011 12:20 PM EST reply actions  

thats the thing

I want to see more of him to know what he can bring and know what his ceiling could be

by DaGribb on Jan 28, 2011 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

He's so raw

but he excels in areas that you can’t really teach. People complain about JaVale’s lack of defensive rebounding, but all Seraphin does is grab the offensive boards. His offensive rebound rate is 6 points higher than his defensive rebound rate. Ridiculous. That’s positive to me, considering he can be expected to improve greatly with experience.

by zl on Jan 28, 2011 6:04 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s like the next Michael Ruffin.

by ReturnofBillyJOe on Jan 28, 2011 6:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Wait

Isn’t the entire focus of this year supposed to be on player development?

Where is player development in your evaluation?

Shouldn’t we be grading Flip on how well John Wall progresses? Nick Young? Booker? Yi?
Which players make significant improvement throughout the year?

It seems like playing time, substitution patterns, schemes, veteran treatment and such – should ALL TAKE A BACK SEAT to player development.

I could give a good goram whether Flip’s substitution patterns make sense – as long as Wall, Yi, Blatche, Young, Seraphin and Booker all look like they’re progressing.

He's "delightfully cranky"

I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.

by Rook6980 on Jan 28, 2011 8:09 PM EST reply actions  

Answered this above from wjb1492

Was going to cover this as a dominant theme throughout all four, but like giving it the extra focus. I was concerned about leaving player development OUT of those categories, as MANY if not MOST of the gripes can be traced back to that overriding theme.

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jan 29, 2011 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Wow

I’m surprised anyone got the reference….

He's "delightfully cranky"

I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.

by Rook6980 on Jan 29, 2011 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

and - from one of my current favorite shows

a short cameo tribute to my

all time favorite
show

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wttwkcu7EoM

He's "delightfully cranky"

I used to have super powers until my psychiatrist took them away.

by Rook6980 on Jan 29, 2011 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha!

Shiny.

P.S. Love it when somebody starts flaming and MP breaks out the chain of command…

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jan 29, 2011 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

FanPosts


Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Ghanaouturuguaytrough_small M. Katz

Small Jeff Newman

Small jkahn15

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

402135_2504659589329_1638181922_1758918_1004201176_n_small Bullet Nation in Exile