20 Days, 20 Questions: Gilbert Arenas's Personality
With the first day of Wizards training camp coming, Bullets Forever is asking 20 questions about key issues with the team in 2010/11.
Notorious, talented, enigmatic, fun-loving, insane, hated and loved; Gilbert Arenas is not an easy man to understand. The Agent Zero and Hibachi that we grew to love did a complete 180 last year. After two lost years to knee injury and a coaching change, he was pushed to become a leader and showed a serious side for the first time in his career. It is unclear how much Gil's seriousness contributed to the gun incident, his on-court performance or his leadership, but there is no doubt that his demeanor this season is a big factor for the Wizards, particularly with him being partly responsible for the development of John Wall.
Which brings us to our next question:
Which Gilbert Arenas personality will we see this season?
Things have been relatively quiet on the Arenas front this offseason. There have been a few trade rumors, and some information about his relationship with Uncle Ted, so maybe just quiet by Agent Zero standards, but still, a little quiet. My take is we will see something in between the serious and crazy. The Wizards have the same coach, and David Stern and the NBA are keeping a close eye on him, so Gil cannot go off of the deep end. Part of the reason for his long suspension is that he did not seem to take the gun incident seriously, as exemplified by his barrage of tweets and the infamous finga gunz episode.That said, since the incident occurred, Gil has appeared to get back to being 'Hibachi'. There has not only been the tweets and finga gunz, but also his interview with Esquire, in which he dropped several gems. He has also switched his jersey number this offseason........twice! I was excited for the 6 shooter era, but Gil has quickly moved onto #9 (nickname needed, and not 9 millimeter). Now that's the kooky guy we know and love!
I honestly never felt comfortable with Gil trying to change who he is. I know we didn't see whether Gil only showed the serious side publicly, but let's face it, he is a really weird dude at heart, and the serious version of him made me uneasy. He can make a concerted effort to be more 'leader like', by shutting down his blog, and generally avoiding media attention, but he can't completely change who he is.
The question then becomes how does his personality affect the Wizards. There is no way to tell whether 'serious Gil' plays better basketball than 'Hibachi'. Last season wasn't a great one for Arenas, but that is likely due to the effects of his knee injuries. Was Gil's leadership at least improved because he toned down his personality? It is hard to say here again. Sure, he was a captain, but the outsider perspective is that Gil was not an improved leader last year. Kirk Hinrich's acquisition indicates that the Wizards also believe more veteran leadership is needed around John Wall. On the other hand, Gil's wild side could be a leadership asset by grabbing media attention and shielding Wall as the rookie acclimates to the NBA.
I think a Gilbert Arenas somewhere between the funny and serious will best serve the team and will be what we see this season. He will not be able to ever be completely stone-faced, but cannot help but know he needs to make an effort to be a better leader, especially now that the offense will likely run through our new PG.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
crazy? really?
First off I love bulletsforever.com I check it everyday to get my fix, but your poll question leaves me a little disappointed. To have a choice between Crazy & Serious I find insulting. To label Gill as insane is dismissive and shows a general lack of understanding of another human being. Like calling someone stupid because they don’t agree with you. Crazy means mentally deranged. Now if you believe he is, well there you go, but that also means you and the entire city loves(ed) a crazy man. What does that say about us?
Gill has done more good for this city than most of us and he deserves our respect even if he made a few bone-headed mistakes they still don’t outweigh what he has done for the community and others in need. If you had asked this question a few years ago before the blow up I wouldn’t have as much of an issue, but with all the Gill hating and framing him as public enemy #1 this poll question does not sit well with me.
Our society has a warped view of our athletes, maybe because we have them on our walls and they represent our city, but they are not elected officials who we have a duty to keep an eye on. These are kids with great ability, more than our own, but that’s it. They are still just kids who for the most part have had their growth stunted from being sheltered from the age someone figures out they are going to be “great.”
And what if Gil does have a mental issue, you just insulted a mentally handicapped person. How many people have been calling Young “stupid” or a “retard” because of his lack of growth within the system, and now we find out he has a learning disability. Are all those people a$$%0#@$? Well if they are I guess they always were, but this is D.C. home of the haters… just check the WAPO boards. How many people are Monday afternoon quarterbacking right now?
But lets look at Gil’s personality from another view point… Would Gil act the way he does if you and every other media head and fan didn’t go “nuts” with ever new quote. He is a journalists/bloggers dream as well as a fans (when healthy)… so give the man his props for keeping us entertained and bringing hope to this city long before Obama moved in. Remember Chicago? So lets stick by our Agent 0 even if he is #9 now and not punk him when it’s convenient by calling him CRAZY… it says more about us than him.
Peace,
Le Bullet
Le Bullet - where being a fan isn't easy, but at least we have lots of cool scars to show for it.
Well said and Well written
I agree with Le Bullet. When I saw the word Crazy it struck me as taking a shot somewhat below the belt. I think Gil made a bad mistake. That mistake should not define who he is a person.
context
Like I said if this was a few years ago it wouldn’t mean that much, because everyone and their mother loved Gil. Now to use crazy when writing/talking about Gil brings a negative connotation.
Like bitch means a female dog, but write that Gil is one and your going to have a fight. So if you did mean crazy good, playin like a beast I pick CRAZY!!!!!!! But that isn’t even a poll question, that’s like asking what do you want for lunch… sushi or a dog biscuit.
I’m not some hype-sensitive dude, but I will stand up for my team when I believe they are being miss-represented especially when it’s here. That’s just the respect I have for this venue.
Le Bullet - where being a fan isn't easy, but at least we have lots of cool scars to show for it.
Okay, I understand
But it’s more important to actually read Jon’s actual content to determine the connotation of the word rather than relying on some mainstream connotation. It seems to be a bit much to go to a call to arms anytime you see one word.
From an outside perspective
you seem to be hyper-sensitive on this issue.
Clearly the post is using an informal usage of the word ‘crazy’. And clearly he is not anti-Arenas.
by MR on Sep 20, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I mean crazy in an endearing way
I even said the Gil we know and love, and was not being facetious. I voted crazy. I do not mean he is literally an insane nutjob that should be institutionalized.
I never linked crazy to the gun incident. If you skip to the poll and don’t read the whole article, then you are making a huuuge leap. I noted that ‘Serious’ Gil is the one who had the gun issue.
Gil is clearly a character. ‘Fun’ or ‘Playful’ Gil didn’t quite fit, so I used crazy. I apologize if it came across as crass.
Crazy
Boring Gil is just Monta Ellis with a three point shot and weaker defense, crazy Gil is one of the most interesting players in the league.
Follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
I believe it was NBA.com who called it "the great debate". Meaning John Wall and GA
His individual performance is subject of debate because of the injuries he had. His oncourt performance is subject of debate as far as sharing a backcourt with Wall since both need the ball in their hands. Team chemistry is questioned in the sence that he might not want to ride Wall’s back seat. His influence on rookie Wall is questioned because of his goofy behaviour in the past (crazy, immature what ever you prefere). Finally also his contract is questioned because of the above and because it ties the hands of the franchise going into the future.
Now, no matter where you stand in the debates on the above points its undeniable that they (the debates) are there. It takes attention away from the new and fresh direction this franchise is going. Therefore i think this team would be better off without gilbert.
For the record, i dont say that because i think GA is going to be bad on or off the court, not because i think he will be a bad influence on Wall or that an ego war will terminate team chemistry, on the contrary. I say that beceause his pressence simply means the debates are going to be there. Like a cloud on a otherwise clear bleu sky for this franchise.
A fresh start could also do wonders for him, beeing free of all those debates.
Your English is fine and your spelling is better than many around here.
However I’d like to see GA play a little. I think if the team wins (a big if) then all of those debates are forgotten.
by MR on Sep 20, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Winning makes everything easier
and since a trade is not going to happen i hope he and wall will rock the league together.
Irony is that if he does play great in the first few months, we might not want to trade him at all! :-)
"If you don't shoot, you can't score"
Johan Cruijff
by Dutch Hoopfan on Sep 20, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Definitely
It’s a huge question, which is why this is only the first Arenas question in this series.
I voted crazy
Because that’s what he is. He’s 28 (?). At this point, you are what you are in life and Gilbert is a character. If he changes what he is, he won’t feel 100% comfortable (especially on the court, at least not right away- i.e Nick Young last year?). I’ll take Gilbert for Gilbert because Arenas, crazy or not, (before the injuries) is a hell of a player.
What does everyone think of Gil's antics acting as a shield for Wall?
Wall seems ready for primetime, but I am starting to think that Gil hogging the lime light for a season could be great for the Great Wall’s development. I am not saying Gil would do this intentionally, but it could work that way.

by 

























