The Wizards and the NBA Developmental League: Will this be more than lip service?
I've been pushing for the Wizards to make better use of the NBA Developmental League pretty much since this blog got started. They've historically shunned it, even though many teams have proven it can be a valuable tool for player development. With all the young projects Ernie Grunfeld has drafted in recent years, you'd think some time getting on-court reps in the D-League would have been a good way to help them practice the fundamentals necessary to succeed in the league.
(Full disclosure: Scott Schroeder, who is probably the ultimate D-League insider over at Ridiculous Upside, is a good blogger friend of mine and has been in my ear about this for a while).
So I find it kind of ironic that the following two things happened yesterday.
First, Flip Saunders told season-ticket holders that the Wizards would use the D-League more this year than in year's past. Via Wizards Extreme:
Saunders says that the #Wizards will try to use the [D-League] a little better/more this year.
Okay, good. Except - on the same day Saunders said this - Kevin Seraphin, a possible candidate for the D-League at some point next season, told a French publication this. (Thanks to CJ Hemp for translating).
Did Washington talk to you about the NBDL (Dleague) ?
Absolutely not! The deal , if they were to take me, there would be no D-League. During the work-out, other teams talked to me about it (D-league) but not Washington. (Washington) definitely want to see mee on the playground so that I progress. Now we will see what will happen ...
At face value, this means we won't see Seraphin get sent down at all. Which, of course, begs the question - if they promised not to send Seraphin down, how, exactly, will the Wizards use the D-League a little "better/more" this year?
Here's the thing about the D-League: only certain players are eligible to play in it. Via the D-League web site:
A player assignment is when an NBA player in his first or second season is sent to his team's NBA D-League affiliate in order to acquire additional playing time. Each NBA team may assign no more than two NBA players at one time to play with its affiliated NBA D-League team (though each NBA team retains the right to make such assignments to other NBA D-League teams at its discretion).
In other words, the only players the Wizards can assign to the D-League are first- and second-year players. In all likelihood, the Wizards will have four such players on the roster: John Wall, Seraphin, Trevor Booker and Hamady N'Diaye. Wall's not getting sent down, and evidently, neither is Seraphin, so all that's left is Booker and Ndiaye. There's really no reason to send down Booker, because he's a polished product that doesn't need seasoning. The D-League is not made for guys like him, and I'd rather have him be channeled into a specific role on the big-league club anyway. That leaves N'Diaye, who remains unsigned and is rumored to be talking to European teams.
At the end of the day, it sounds like the way the Wizards will use the D-League better is ... by occasionally sending their late second-round pick down. Which is ok, I guess, but hardly signals any sort of fundamental change. Maybe Saunders meant they would look to the D-League for player acquisitions more often, like they did at the end of last year. This is also ok, but again, it's not a huge shift from year's past.
I'd like to get excited about Saunders' promise. I really would. But if they've indeed ruled out sending down Seraphin, then I find it hard to believe their actions will live up to their words.
7 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Definitely agree the Wiz need to utilize the D-League
Maybe even consider owning their own franchise if at all possible (I believe some other teams may already be doing this). I personally think that any player averaging less than 10mins a game should be sent to the D-League. What good is practice if you can not apply what you learned in an actual game setting? Also helps to evaluate and correct some of the quirks a player may have in-game that they may not otherwise be doing in practice.
Plus I think it does a lot for the player’s confidence overall to not just be sitting at the end of a bench night in and night out. Really felt like JaVale and Nick should have got some D-League reps earlier in their careers.
by TheRealBigMike on Aug 19, 2010 10:53 AM EDT reply actions
Put a D-League Franchice in B-More
I would go to games!
shine like bald head, smoke trees call me log head
by ThaCaronic on Aug 19, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I like it in principle
At the same time, Seraphin should be able to get plenty of minutes. Javale’s good for like 30 a game due to foul issues he usually has, and Seraphin, with his bulk and athleticism, is a better fit at center than Dray in my opinion. I think the d league is better for guys who would otherwise get 10 minutes or less a night, basically Pech minutes.
Follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
by pantslessyoda1 on Aug 19, 2010 11:25 AM EDT reply actions
My thoughts exactly
And since it looks like N’Diaye may not sign then that means the Wiz will actually use the D-League LESS than last year, assuming they stay healthy (because why would they make acquisitions with most or all of the roster spots satisfied?)
Nick Young and Kevin Seraphin would be a good canidates for some DL time
Thortan and Yi seem to have reached there game not sure DL time would help them
i dont think we send McGee down He is going to be a MAJOR weapon for WALL yes sir !!
WOW WE GOT JOHN FREAKIN WALL !!!!

by 

















