Wizards Reportedly Trade Quinton Ross For Yi Jianlian
It looks like the overhaul of the Wizards' roster is continuing today, according to Al Iannazonne and Adrian Wojnarowski, who are both reporting the Wizards and Nets have agreed to a trade involving Yi Jianlian and Quinton Ross.
Iannazonne reported rumors of the deal first:
The team is working on a deal with the Wizards that would send Yi and cash to Washington for a player who makes "significantly less" than what the Nets' power forward earns. Three sources confirmed this is in the process of getting done.
The player is Quinton Ross, who earns $1.14 million. Yi is set to earn $4.05 million. The roughly $3 million savings the Nets will create will give them around $30 million available to spend on free agents.
Wojnarowski is also reporting the same on Yahoo Sports:
Washington sent Quinton Ross to the Nets for Yi, who has been traded twice since the Milwaukee Bucks selected him with the sixth overall pick in the 2008 draft. The Nets also sent $3 million to the Wizards.
New Nets coach Avery Johnson didn't consider Yi a fit for his system, and the Nets were anxious to clear even more cap space to make a run at LeBron James(notes) and several major free agents.
Quick analysis after the jump.
Talent-wise, this trade is a win for the Wizards. Jianlian hasn't lived up to his draft billing, but at least he can get on the floor, something Ross struggled to do, before the addition of John Wall and Kirk Hinrich, not to mention the return of Gilbert Arenas. Jianlian doesn't give the team much help defensively, but he gives the Wizards some scoring touch at the power forward position that Trevor Booker might be lacking.
Does the bump in talent make up for the extra $3 million the Wizards will be paying next season? I'm not so sure. For the $3 million in extra salary the Wizards took on to acquire him, the Wizards could have likely picked up a late first/early second round pick that would have given the team a younger, potentially better player. Thankfully, Jianlian's contract doesn't extend past 2010-11, unless the Wizards pick up his qualifying offer at the end of the season, which would seem unlikely at this point.
It's not the worst trade in the world. The Wizards will be putting together a better product when the season starts because of this trade. Of course, you could say the same thing about the Kirk Hinrich trade, which is kind of the problem. Remember, it's not about winning the trade, it's about the larger vision. Does this trade bring the team closer to that vision? I don't think it does.
(Thanks to oatmealeater for getting the discussion going).
328 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Getting cash
and not draft picks is disappointing.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 2:47 PM EDT reply actions
B/c
The Nyets aren’t stupid; they know their odds of getting James isn’t 100%, and the best backup to a failed Free Agency Quest is a Top Draft Pick.
The Nets aren't the only possible trading partner out there
Considering a first round pick was sold for $3 million cash, and that saving $3 million in cap space is much more valuable than $3 million in cash, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that the Wiz could have extracted a future first from one of Miami, NO, Indiana, or NJ in exchange for taking on $3-6 million in contracts.
Incidentally, I love the “Nyets.”
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Hmmm
I’m trying to withhold judgment for now until I see everything they’ve done, but I can say now, I don’t know what the hell they’re doing. So far, I’m not too excited with what I’m seeing.
My swag was phenomenal.
yes…but the cash is necessary because these guys are underperformers relative to their salaries. i dont like he doesnt play defense, but maybe they arent available.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 2:50 PM EDT reply actions
cash not picks
I think we got cash and not picks because Yi is going to contribute to our team whereas Ross was going to contribute to bench-clapping quota. Its another case where we like the player.
I can understand that
but I don’t like the strategy. I doubt Yi is going to play close to well enough to justify $5 mil – his qualifying offer next year. Therefore, it seems likely he will only be here for one year, and I don’t see why we would use our cap space to make a modest upgrade to our roster for only one year. We’ll be back at square one next summer. I’d much rather have tried to get draft picks, any picks, that will potentially help our team for several years into the future.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
which
which player is worth more at the trade deadline, Ross, his game, and his 1M contract or Yi, his game, and an expiring 4M contract?
That ignores the fact
That there are more than just two options. I’m arguing that it would have been better to try to get a draft pick out of NJ, NO, or Miami with our cap space than getting cash.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions
yes, but Tim Thomas' dessicated corpse
was worth two draft picks. One would think that Yi would be worth at least one.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
by Sean Fagan on Jun 29, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Won't we still have cap room
To add another $3 million down the road in the form of a draft pick? I’m not positive on where we are relative to the cap right now.
This one's all about the money boys....
As a savvy poster over on RealGm, pcbothwel, put it
Also, dont underestimate the Chinese aspect. This is a quick way to build the Wizard/John Wall brand overseas and allow a generation of people to “grow” with Wall over the next 10-12 years.
It’s all about getting some hundred million Chinese people to watch John Wall’s rookie year.
Forget basketball.
by Hoopalotta on Jun 29, 2010 2:56 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
There's a chance this makes Wall an all-star in his first year
Look at the number of asg votes Yao’s teammates get.
Follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
by pantslessyoda1 on Jun 29, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Great point
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 29, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I must note.....
That it was the other RealGm poster that I was quoting there: pcbothwel
I realized the money involvement from the Chinese market, but he was the one who put it together with Wall’s rookie year.
I can’t take the credit!
Hmmmm
I’m not sure exactly what the Chairman brings, he isn’t exactly a rebounding machine.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
yeah kinda
I can see everyone’s points about marketing, global brand yadda yadda. But from a pure basketball perspective, I’m not sure if Yi is going to add much of anything. I would rather have gotten a pick back, but hey, we seem completely incapable of extracting those from a trading partner.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
i like it
YI got a yr left on his contract so if he doesn’t pan out oh well…but anything is an upgrade over Ross
I'm chinese so I'll be a bit biased
exchanging ross for a 22 year old, 7ft guy with talent is a really good trade.
His contract of being 3million greater is neutralized somewhat by the cash the wiz got and
He is young with “potential” and in case he turns out worse than we thought, his contract is expiring anyways. He also has no known character issues which we always seem to loathe.
i read somewhere that
yi isnt actually 22 and lied about his age
but i could be wrong, but I also read that China forges age a lot for olympics or something
i could be wrong again, and I’m too lazy to research that
by Young Wook Lee on Jun 29, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah
i seem to remember hearing that hes actually 28 or something… might have just been baseless rumor… i actually like yi’s game if he got a little bigger and worked on defense/rebounding he could be a decent starting PF
I heard he was 46 1/2 and has 12 grandkids
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 30, 2010 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Chad Ford is reporting that we're trading our trade exception too
how’s that change things? and is it true? I only see it in Chad Ford’s article.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5340026
Yeah, I'm not sure what he's talking about
Also, Yi’s going to compete with Dray for the starting job? Haha!
I thought you can only use it after you reached the max of the salary cap. How does this work?
by ThePGPhenomenon on Jun 29, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm guessing they had to renounce it to absorb Yi's salary
If you’re under the cap, the exceptions count on your cap figure until you get rid of them. They probably needed to get rid of one to stay under the cap.
There must be a bigger fish to fry
I’d like to give Ernie the benefit of the doubt and conclude that he is methodically accumulating components that will enable him to move Gilbert. I share the opinion with those that believe that if John Wall is to thrive in D.C., then he must be handed the keys and Arenas needs to get traded. Some extra cash to dangle in front of potential trade partners to ease their payroll hit could be what it takes to get a deal done. If all the Yi deal cost us is the $4.5 mil trade exception and a bag of chips (Ross) and Ernie adds another $3 mil as bait . . . .just sayin’.
REEBOK
Yao Ming is a Reebok deal and adding Yi Jianlian could be seen as a link to John Wall and the Chinese market as well.
Yi
Classic Wizard / Bullet pickup !
by Mikko Leinonen's opposite on Jun 29, 2010 3:02 PM EDT reply actions
I'm unconvinced on the value
I know that the Zards were not going to play the FA market, but couldn’t we have gotten a player of Yi’s skill set for much much cheaper? Couldn’t we rent a Johan Petro, Louis Amundson, or Ike Diogu for half that cost.
I am going to be really interested in seeing how the market plays out over the next week and seeing which free agents are left over that the Wizards may have been able to acquire.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Upside
Do any of the guys you mentioned have the upside of Yi? Maybe Diogu, seems like he’s never been given the chance to play.
I think Amundson is pretty good
You’re right, players like Petro or Warrick ect., probably are not much more then they are. But I haven’t seen Yi show a particular affinity for learning basketball in the past two years.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
can this guy play basketball??? their team stunk and all i heard about was lopez being the only good player.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 3:04 PM EDT reply actions
I'm torn
On the one hand, this is a classic BOYD trade. We’re taking advantage of the Nets’ desperation to get a tiny bit more cap room to take on a prospect (even if Yi is pretty terrible). It’s also only a one-year thing – if it doesn’t work out, we can renounce him next year.
On the other hand – where is Yi going to play? We have enough project young bigs, why get another. And from a larger standpoint, the Wizards have been talking about their need to get tougher. How can you say that on the one hand, then trade for a guy like Yi Jianlian?
So, I dunno. As Hoppalotta said, it’s probably a non-basketball move more than anything.
From what I've seen, he's at less of a disadvantage there than trying to guard 4's in the paint.
Of course, he’s not really good at either, but, hey. On offense, he’s certainly seemed like more of a 3.
Probably mostly 5
Booker and Blatche will most likely split all of the power forward minutes. Yi’s not very physical, but he’s big and strong enough (7’0, 250) to guard most centers, I think.
Follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
by pantslessyoda1 on Jun 29, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions
i heard there was little chance
of seraphin playing in the nba this season i think he has one more year left in europe
correcting myself
he has a year left on his contract with french team and has a 500,000 dollar buyout… he wants to come here this year so it might happen
i am pretty sure he is expected to play with us this year but not before summer league. which i took to mean by training camp.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions
we desperately need a guy who wont get backed down to the basket for layups and hook shots like mcgee gives up
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I think you're right.
Looking at the stats, I knew he was playing the 4 last year, but I didn’t realize how little he has actually played SF. I assume he’d split more time there but nope, it was Mason and Simmons getting the bulk of that time in Mil too. Oh well.
Ha
he’s not quick enough to defend at the 4
We're from the city with the highest murder rate in the country. Why WOULDN'T they call us the Bullets?
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 30, 2010 1:40 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm afraid
that Grunfeld (based on his history, though that’s changed a bit this year) will decide that he hasn’t had enough time to truly evaluate Yi and extend his salary for another year or two.
Ridiculous Upside, where developing talent and winning are not mutually exclusive.
"We have enough project young bigs, why get another?"
That’s rebuilding, brother. Get projects, let them fight it out and see who develops.
Unless you're Minnesota
Follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
by pantslessyoda1 on Jun 29, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
let's face it
we don’t have a history of staying healthy enough to worry about that. It’s a long season. even if he ends up being an above average 15 minute a game guy with who swings between the three frontcourt positions, he’ll play more than Ross would. Plus he could be more and may even bring some needed outside shooting. I don’t mind it.
I don't really mind it either
But I just don’t want to hear from the team about how the competition will spur all these guys to new heights. It really doesn’t work that way in the NBA – in fact, it usually has the opposite effect. Pros want to have a good idea of where and when they’ll play. Obviously, they can’t all get that, but this whole “turn them against each other” concept is not a particularly smart way to develop players.
I’d rather use the roster spot on a cheap vet who knows he probably won’t play much and is there mostly in a mentoring role. Plus, if you have to use them to send a message to their young guy, there should at least be less resentment.
i kinda feel like we've tried that
Oberto, anyone? I realize he wasn’t exactly “cheap”.
I dunno, I don’t necessarily feel like handing the keys to guys with a sense of entitlement (Blatche, McGee) is necessarily the way to go either.
*cough*Haywood/Thomas*cough*
Now, I think Saunders will be able to handle this much better than EJ would’ve, but the Wizards as a franchise don’t exactly have the best track record with having young players compete with one another.
Ridiculous Upside, where developing talent and winning are not mutually exclusive.
i thought prospect implied potential. otherwise, isnt it just body filler? NBDL is a better place to look for that!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm holding out for a trade at this point...
one where we hopefully DON’T trade any of the guys we just drafted
We're from the city with the highest murder rate in the country. Why WOULDN'T they call us the Bullets?
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jun 30, 2010 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Yi represents the same type of unfulfilled promise...
that people saw in Kwame and Darko. He is not even close to being as physical as those guys but the core issue of tantalizing promise is very similar. He was a #6 pick after all. He can score a bit and (very) occasionally he also plays tough on the boards.
Considering that Ross brought less than zero to the table, that there is only one year left on Yi’s contract, and that the Wiz play in C-Town… and Yi represents a low-risk, high gain deal in my book.
What is the high gain?
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions
High gain
is that millions of people watch basketball in China and the Rockets got a ton of attention because of Yao in China. Once the fans are locked in on a team they become interested in other players, such as Tracy McGrady who sold the most jerseys in China ( http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2313239 ). Reebok also stands to gain…considering John Wall in the new face of their basketball shoe movement and Yao Ming having been there past model why not try to branch off the Chinese market through Yi Jianlian drawing fans to John Wall. CIRCLE OF LIFE!
Gotcha
So high gain for Leonsis, but not really for the fans.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions
What?????
No, high gain for the Wizards brand, more revenue that could spent on beefing up scouting, training, facilities, etc. The more popular the organization gets, the more likely players will want to come here. Leonsis has shown interest in China before. This move, while negligible from a bball standpoint (unless Yi really is 22 and thus still has a shred of potential), seems like a marketing no-brainer.
by Stanicek on Jun 29, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I forgot how eager
free agents were to go to NJ because of Yi Chinese connection. This is a huge stretch. It’s much more likely that Yi will be here for a year or less, Leonsis will pocket some extra cash, and the Wiz will have missed an opportunity to acquire an asset that could help us out 3-4 years down the road.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions
if you don't see
the reasoning behind trying to market in China then you’re blind. The Nets were more then pathetic and had nothing to be excited about. The Wizards can take advantage of John Wall while he’s the next big thing and utilize it much more then the Nets could have.
by DaGribb on Jun 29, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
you have to be good enough to get meaningful minutes on the court and contribute
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Landon Donovan
got offered 4 mil to play for Manchester City and maybe he doesn’t get substantial playing time, but Manchester City added the US market b/c people want to see a US player in the big league.
I see why Leonsis would want to market to China
I don’t see renting Yi for one year as being very effective. And I certainly don’t see a strong correlation between marketing to China and more wins on the court.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions
except for management
marketing is just as important as winning if not more, afterall, they arent owning the team to lose money
by Young Wook Lee on Jun 29, 2010 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions
And that's hardly something to be excited about
as fans.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions
damn skippy
As a fan I want my franchise to be financially healthy, thriving, and always looking for new revenue. i don’t want to be a Marlins fan, celebrate a once a decade title then sell everyone off for scrap.
The only reason to want the franchise to make money
is so that they spend that money on getting better. Taking cash instead of draft picks is not spending money to get better.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions
i just as soon them save the money on the heinrichs and yis of the world. get some more undrafted free agents, NBDL players, adcknowledge we are rebuilding, lower ticket prices 15 bucks a game and be better positioned in the lottery. 30-50 win teams are no mans land.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I got news for you
The Wizards are going to be around .500 or better next year. There’s no way they are going to win less than 35 games with Wall/Arenas/Blatche/McGee/Hinrich
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 29, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions
great! mid teens pick and no chance to compete for anything…again…
i think they win 30 games without hinrich or yin. which is why i am not excited about these trades. if you sense that after 30 years of mediocrity, there is a short leash for average, you’d be right. you can only go through the motions for sooo long. now they get a legit #1 to build around, and they fill up their cap space to win a couple more games. when the longer term view is to not fill out that roster and win a fcouple fewer games, get better draft position and spend a year or two drafting a legit young core. and maybe in 4-5 yrs we actually can play for something.
ps- i realize you have to fill out the roster. but you dont have to spend 6.5mm for a back up guard. yin trade is more in line but it too cost 3mm plus a 5mm trade exception- which had value!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions
lol
can these moves not be considered rebuilding attempts? Grunfeld didn’t buy picks like we wanted them to, but he didn’t sign a big FA for multiple years….. YET so I don’t see how this strays off the path of rebuilding b/c we got Seraphin and Jianlian who are both young and a 2 yr deal for Hinrich isn’t ruining the rebuilding 4 years down the road. You can say all you want about not having more draft picks in the future, but we still have ours in tact and our cap space is still flexible enough and not in jeopardy come 4 years from now.
i agree- nothing he has done is ruining the franchise. but will it matter? and the opportunity cost winning a few more meaningless games is unknown. it would be nice if we could land one more all star level talent before these contracts roll and can add one free agent to the roster. i m not excited that seraphin, booker, yi, or heinrich is that guy. and we still need a starting, lockdown wing. but we’ll see
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions
You're not understanding the Wiz' strategy
The Wiz aren’t going to win the lottery again and are unlikely to get a top 5 pick under any circumstances.
There is no rule that says you MUST lose for 4-5 yeras to rebuild properly. OKC started over 2 years ago and they are now a 50 win team. It can happen that fast.
The Wiz are probably 2 years away and by then neither of Hinrich or Yi is likely to be with the team, but the $13M in cap space they represent will be enough to buy the pieces to put the Wiz over the top.
The good news is the Wizards already have the young core you think they need to find.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 29, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions
The Wiz would also have had that $13 mil
if they hadn’t made these misguided trades in the first place. Simply because a bad salary comes off the books some time in the future doesn’t make it a good idea to take on that salary. What would have been nice is to have a couple more picks next year who would have gained a year of experience by the time the Wiz want to use that $13 mil. Instead we just rented two guys for a year or two with no long term gain.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Honestly
You don’t seem capable of judging the moves objectively. You value “picks” but don’t seem to value Seraphin or Yi, which represent the same as picks without the investment in assets or cap space.
I’m confused as to how you’d be impressed.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 30, 2010 5:11 AM EDT up reply actions
?
If we aren’t here to judge this trade or the other moves objectively, what are we here for? That’s why I read this site multiple times a day.
It seems that by objectively
You mean agreeing with you. I could say you don’t judge things objectively. You have ignored most evidence pointing to how these trades are bad.
You're looking at a 25 win team
maybe 30 max. Even with Wall and Arenas, you would need everything to break right for this team to sneak into the playoffs. When you make these kind of trades, you need to trade for future assets such as picks, not overpriced project big men.
Again, if the Wizards turn Yi into two first round draft picks like OKC did with Thomas, I will stand corrected. But I don’t think that is likely at this juncture.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
To a certain degree
Yes, I think they will. But only incrementally. Do I think they will drop out of the lottery? No I don’t. The team has too many new parts, young players for me to think that it will miraculously gel. Then you have the on again off again thing with Gil, which I think will be a distraction.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Im not sure
If Flip keeps the player’s confidence up I think we definently have enough talent to win as many games as a team like the Bucks. We are in the eastern conference. You dont think we can win as many games as the freakin Bobcats or the Bucks???
Both teams were known
for their amazing defense. I’m not sure a team that starts Gil, Wall, McGee, and Blatche is going to stop anyone enough.
Wall could be a great defender, I’m not so sure about the other three.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
I think they'll be more entertaining
obviously with Wall and Arenas and a bunch of new guys to scout for the future, but I agree with Fagan and maybe a little better, but not by much.
30 wins max?
So Wall + Arenas (leaving everything else out) is worth a nothing more than 4 wins? Wall can’t be that nice if he can’t do better than that….
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 30, 2010 5:12 AM EDT up reply actions
they might but we dont know where they would draft if they did things differently. last year most would laugh at the thought that we would win less than 2 dozen games and win the #1 pick!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Jonathan
You spent the day after the draft point out how all the “experts” were lauding the Wizard’s draft haul, and that we were being silly for questioning the basketball intellegentsia.
Today, those same basketball people are killing the Wizards over this trade. So, were both events wins for the Wizards? Are the experts who you say that we should listen to only selectively right?
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Unfortunate
that you would say as much when it’s true.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 30, 2010 5:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't believe this fits the definition of "ad hominem" my friend.
Maybe the tone is a bit sharp, but I don’t see a straight up personal attack here.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 30, 2010 8:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Was just going to say that
It points out an inconsisticeny in Jonathan’s logic. First, he appealed to an authority (a fallacy in itself). Then, he ignores that same authority when it disagrees with him. There was no argument such as, well Jonathan is fat so don’t believe him.
But Jonathan cannot have it both ways. If the experts are to be believed, then the draft was excellent and this trade suck. If they aren’t to be believed then the draft was terrible and this trade was good. Or they are incompetent, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. If this is true, it is foolish to appeal to them as an authority at all.
I suppose its a ad hominem tu quoque argument if you want to be specific.
What JJ said the day after the draft has nothing to do with his argument about this trade.
Well
The argument isn’t so much that what he is saying now IS false. It more or less points out that his previous argument on the draft must be false if he denies the basketball experts on this issue. Or, if he wants to stay consistent, that this trade sucks.
Only one can be true, the possibility exists that both could be false (and I guess both could be true, but the reasoning behind that is very poor). SO it is not a fallacy in this sense. I don’t believe Sean was trying to say, “You are wrong here, because you said this about experts a few days ago.” What he is saying is you were either wrong today or wrong yesterday, which is not a fallacious argument.
Wow
I think you stated it much more succinctly and nicely then I could have. You must be/have been a Philo major.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Actually it does
The argument “you are stupid, because you don’t believe the experts who say our draft was awesome. You must believe those experts,” directly correlates to the same experts saying that this move was lame.
Its not meant to be ad hominem or personal. It is meant to point out a logic gap that you could drive a bus through.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
I’m not accusing you of making personal attacks; sorry if I implied that by saying it was ad hominem.
The issue is not whether it “directly correlates” or not. If JJ made a fallacy before, go ahead and call him out on it, but it doesn’t touch this argument.
Obviously, no one is going to be on Team Expert, agreeing with the experts 100% of the time, or Team Anti-Expert, never agreeing with them.
Besides, who are these experts killing this trade?
Whether you guys are right or not
It’s still two separate points that don’t really have much to do with each other. I don’t think it’s good for us to continue going down this road.
Don't know...
who the basketball people who are “killling” the Wiz over this trade but I’m happy to lay into them too.
There’s nothing to dislike in this trade.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 30, 2010 5:15 AM EDT up reply actions
With a player you either want a proven record or you want upside. Even when Ernie swings for the fences, the Wizards get someone with upside, potential, whatever. In Yi, the Wizards get a 25 year old 7-foot pushover with no record and bc of his age no potential. And 3.5 million less of their main asset (cap space).
How many guys blossom at 25?
by morethesamewiz on Jun 30, 2010 7:35 AM EDT up reply actions
No record and no potential
I don’t know how to respond to this. He did average 12/7 in the NBA last season right? And which 7 footers in the NBA blossomed BEFORE 25? Almost none.
Do you realize that the free agent market value of a 7 footer who averages 12/7 would likely be more than $3.5M right?
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 30, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Per game numbers are pretty worthless
It’s the per minute numbers that matter, and his suck.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 30, 2010 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions
What is the young "core"?
Wall, and … Blatche?
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 30, 2010 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions
OKC
2007- 2nd, 5th, 31st
2008-4th, 24th, 29th (from 32nd and 46th), 50th, 56th
2009- 3rd, 24th (from 25th)
2010- 11th, 18th (traded), 31st, 51st, 57th
OKC has had four strong drafts since they began rebuilding.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 30, 2010 7:32 AM EDT up reply actions
What is the young "core"?
Wall and maybe Blatche? Don’t tell me the rookies — they are only prospects with some potential.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 30, 2010 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions
except
you can market a team more effectively with good players.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
no one we traded for will be marketed to get people in the door
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Wizards will be on television more now though
maybe Seraphin or Yi gets the Wiz games in France and China more often…reasonable expectation?
um
besides Golden State/LA, the Nets were in the BEST position to market Yi population wise. I’m not sure your argument holds water.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Yes, I understand your point
and Lebron still sells better than Yi in China. So I’m not sure if I agree with the premise of your argument. When Japan follow Japanese players, they follow them when they’re good – players like Ichiro, or Godzilla Matsui. They don’t follow Kaz Matsui.
China is going to follow Yao, and then the most marketable stars. Televisions are not tuned in for the 8th dude on a terrible team.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
they have to be good and on winning teams for people outside his family or village to care
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions
but you don't need Yi
to market effectively. Its not like his is selling jerseys and necessarily gaining more eyeballs. Hell, Gilbert Arenas has the 6th most popular jersey in China, but we’ve never spoken about his “great Chinese impact.”
The Yi as ambassador argument is a total trojan horse. Grunfeld wanted another project big for cheap and he got him
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Yes
Grunfeld got another project big one a 1 year contract for nothing.
What’s not to like?
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 29, 2010 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, a lot
As I have pointed out elsewhere in this post. Plus, on this particular point, that wasn’t the argument I was making. If you read the discussion, you would realize that we were talking about Yi as a marketing tool.
It’s a meh trade in some aspects. (cost, opportunity, asset gain). Hopefully, Yi can turn it around.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
COST?!?!?!
It cost as close to nothing as possible. It’s all opportunity at no cost. I don’t understand the overwhelming negative sentiment around here.
We still need to field an NBA team this season. We happen to get a shot at a prospect on a 1 year tryout.
I don’t think it’s reasonable to find/have that many issues with this trade. Sorry.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 29, 2010 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Opportunity cost
is a real cost. So is losing a trade exemption.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions
True
but at this point it’s just a random opinion that there are better options out there (and with every call Grunfeld’s made, I think you’ve sided with the “other option” each time.
The Wizards now have a potentially very good backcourt, loaded with young big men and still have major, major cap flexibility going forward and just fleeced 2 teams for assets while giving up nothing of value (the potential trade exception being the most valuable asset given up). So the consistent second guessing of the GM seems out of place to me.
Maybe every one of these moves backfires but until then they all seem like reasonable moves to me.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 29, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know what else to
call getting something for nothing.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 30, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions
You keep saying that
even though it is demonstrably wrong.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 30, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions
You're right
It is conjecture that Ernie had other options. But based on what other teams have done, it seems logical to assume those options existed. The market price was set.
I agree
I like the trade and maybe Yi doesn’t become the player we hope, but he’s young and worth a shot. Many people on this site have been so negative towards everything Grunfeld has done b/c it hasn’t been performed on the level of the Trail Blazers or Thunder’s GMs. The Wiz have John Wall and Andray Blatche who could be solid pieces for the future. We all agree that it’s about being championship contenders in 4-5 years and nothing Grunfeld has done so far has put that out of reach. We have like 8 players under 25 and Arenas is the only player with a big/long contract…everyone needs to chill out!
The only way I can get myself to care about Yi
is if he plays well enough that we would want to give him the $5 mil qualifying offer. To me that seems extremely unlikely.
Otherwise, he will be a free agent, and we could have just signed him next summer anyway. That’s why some people are talking about him as a one year rental.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 30, 2010 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Well for one
I’m allowed to entitled to my opinion.
Here is what I don’t like
A) We spent more cap room without seeing how the market plays out.
B) We most likely won’t resign Singleton who provides a savvy veteran presence.
C) We didn’t gain any other asset out of the move, therefore it’s not really BOYD.
D) We have less minutes to go to Blatche and Booker.
So yes, I think there are reasons to be concerned. It does come at a cost. A chance to resign a player who played well for the Wizards. A chance to sign a free agent. And a cost of developing the players we just drafted.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
by Sean Fagan on Jun 29, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
replies
A) You are assuming that the market “plays out” differently than Grunfeld has already played it. So unless someone comes available unexpectedly than you’d be incorrect.
B) Hope they resign Singleton but am wouldn’t lose sleep if they didn.t
C) It’s not a BOYD trade. It’s a 1 year tryout for a young big.
D) Are you sure?
No offense, but if your best concern is that it may take minutes from the potential resignig of James Singleton than you don’t have much of a complaint (and I’m a big Singelton fan).
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 30, 2010 5:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Hmmm
A) So Grunfeld never has to advocate patience because their is no guarantee of the future?
B) Coach on the floor Hinrich good, coach on the floor Singleton bad?
C) Right, so we are doing the Nets favors now?
D) Yes, six young big guys. Only so many minutes
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
it cost us 8mm in salary and cap exceptions. that is what is not to like. though i like it more than this comment suggests!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions
I think it would be interesting to see
Obviously, the only thing I have come up with thusfar is jersey sails, which is a rather flimsy stat to hang my argument on. If Yi does necessarily lead to better bang at the box office, I might feel differently about the trade.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
i think you have a legitimate angle/point. i think it is a stretch to think that yi makes a difference
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions
lol- yep…not for long i hope. who knows…booker was worth 2 picks. i hope he is better!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions
i m pretty sure gilbert likes chinese food and always reads his fortune cookie
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
good in that he can start on our team and play more than 20 min a game
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know that Leonsis will "pocket" the cash
He’s shown a willingness to spend on the Capitals, and I think he’ll do the same with the Wiz.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 29, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Yet he's 0-3
when faced with an opportunity to get back a pick instead or money, or to spend money to buy a pick.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Leonsis isn't EG
I wouldn’t assume Leonsis is calling every shot. He tends to sit back and let the GM do the work. Also, I wouldn’t call taking on Hinrich’s contract “pocketing cash.” I also wouldn’t assume Wiz could have had a pick here instead. They are spending — whether that spending will be effective is a different story.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 29, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Ermmm......
I really think your initial point about Ted being 0-3 on taking picks instead of cash was more like it.
By no means is it 100%, but I would not be surprised if we could have gotten picks back instead of cash in some of these deals (New Jersey has hoards of future second round picks, including 2011 & 2012 picks from Golden State, which should be high).
And, I mean, “Yi for free” screams “business decision” over “basketball value”.
Of course we don’t really know that and long term he’ll probably kick the money back into the club, but it was worth mentioning.
I would agree with this
Ted’s setting the general vision, but the execution comes down on EG and the management team. That’s what they’re paid for.
Randy Foye
I heard someone mention #6 picks
by morethesamewiz on Jun 29, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions
But don't you eventually
Need to add players? You can’t stack up draft picks forever. You need to actually field a team, right?
But the point is
we haven’t stacked up any. Why are we just renting space on the roster? Aside from the sheer marketing value, how does this really help the team?
The point is that two days before free agency, NJ should be desperate to make this trade.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Huh?
Didn’t we just add the #17 draft pick and a guy drafted #6 overall a few years ago for……Quentin Ross and a potential 2nd round pick which is essentially a total of nothing?
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 29, 2010 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Who cares if he was drafted #6
There have been a great many busts drafted 1-60 in the draft. I don’t care where he was drafted. I appreciate you following me around, but this deal does have ramifications. I’m not sure why you can’t see this.
For now let’s just agree to disagree.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Sorry
but your complaint continues to be the lack of obtaining draft picks but you aren’t happy with players who have been drafted with draft picks.
It’s not just agreeing to disagree. You’ve got to be willing to acknowledge both sides.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 30, 2010 5:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Mr. Joseph,
If you have been paying attention you also would have noticed that nobody advocated extending Randy Foye (pick #7) and very few advocated taking on Beasley (pick #2). Nobody here favors blindly adding former lottery picks without respect to their performance in the NBA. The only reason we favor adding new draft picks is because each draft pick is an opportunity and an inexpensive one and the more opportunities you provide yourself, the more likely you are that one or more of them will pan out.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 30, 2010 7:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes, but I wouldn't advocate
taking players who are not very good with draft picks. It’s not like we just acquired Brandon Roy here. The point is that a future draft pick in an opportunity, while Yi is a know quantity. You can’t value a player at where he was drafted, you only value the opportunity that a draft pick offers you.
I have acknowledged both sides – several times. But you continue to see it from your own unusual perspective.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
How is Yi a known quantity?
Is McGee? Was Blatche a few years ago? Is Nick Young?
The guy is 7 feet tall and is entering his 4th year. He is still developing. Still getting better…hopefully.
MR- are you happy with NY?
Two teams have sold him on the cheap, that tells me something. He has an aversion to rebounding and banging – that can’t be relearned.
So yes, I think his qualities are fairly well known.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
He's probably never going to be a banger. I'll agree with that
Then again neither is Nowitzki.
But I don’t think he’s a “known quantity”. He’s a young developing 7 footer. He has some upside.
And frankly I think he’s a guy that Flip can fit into an offensive system.
I don’t really predict that he’s going to set the league ablaze, but I think his possible upside is worth the small investment we’ve made in him.
nowitzki never won either. big men need to play inside first…if they can play outside too- great!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 30, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
But Nowitzki is a pretty successfull perimiter big man
Lebron hasn’t won a title. Neither has Bosh. Neither has Carmello, Durant etc etc etc.
If the only criteria for being a successful basketball player is winning a title then let’s just max out Fisher and be done with it.
Shannon Brown
the Lakers are his fourth team in 6 years and he’s just starting to breakout. So thinking any player that young is completely a known quantity is silly.
And
it’s likely that the average mid-first round draft pick has no better chance of NBA success than the liklihood that Yi gets better.
It’s not opportunity vs no opportunity. It’s just a different opportunity and statistically not much different.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 30, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
and 14mm and a five mm trade exception, the 14mm also includes heinrich whos fair value for 2 years is what guys??? 8-10mm?
so we got the 17 for 3-4mm and the former #6 who would not go anywhere near that spot for what you said and the trade exception
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions
yao ming was good…this guy??? i think u need to be more than just chinese- lol
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions
all star balloting
Yi wasn’t put on the ballot and that’s b/c he was Chinese
http://www.hoopsvibe.com/features/breaking-down-the-nba/50399-why-yi-jianlian-shouldnt-be-on-all-star-ballot
i dont buy that reason unless you tell me yao ming wasnt put on the ballot ever. i dont think yi is pretty good. and it is hard for anyone to be considered for all star balloting when your team wins 12 games or so all year. and i think half of those came in the back half of the season! and he is not even the best player on the team!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions
okay, we find out next year what we can move and gain lots of cap space.
Yi has been in the league 3 years only.
3rd season: ppg. 12.5, rpg. 7.1
Yao Ming 3rd season: ppg. 18.1, rpg 8.4
Remember when barkley said yao would amount to nothing, and he’d kiss and ass’ ass? IT takes time for some foreign players to develop, and NJ wasn’t exactly a winning combo of coaching and glory like yao got in houston. It also took a long time before a similar player like Peja Stojakovic gave anything meaningful either.
So lets calm the hell down, it’s one season, it’s a rebuild. What did you expect to trade Ross for? a 2011 pick? HA! you’re smoking. You guys jump the gun to early on a 5 year rebuild.
Even the caps sucked the first 2.5 years they had Ovechkin.
i dont mind this trade because i forgot all about ross. he was not in the future cards
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I would agree with you
if I had seen Yi show a pulse. He plays way too passive for my tastes.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
I don’t see us playing him at the 3 — dude’s not quick enough to play there. And unless he starts drinking HGH for breakfast I doubt he’ll be a starting 4 either. But if he’s athletic enough to come off the bench and hit threeballs like Horry, then it shakes out pretty well imo.
However, I remember that guy Shakamanillivanilli from Russia, also a lotto pick, who was traded a few times and turned out to be squadoosh. My unprofessional view is that Yi will turn out kinda like that — and we coulda used our salary space much better than this.
I wonder if this is gamesmanship
I feel okay about the move… Don’t think much of Yi, but I think nothing of Ross. It’s a plus on its own, just not a very big one.
But combined with the Chicago trade, and considering the rumor that NY is dangling Gallinari in the hopes of moving Curry’s contract, I wonder if Ernie isn’t making this move to force NY and other suitors to make similar lopsided trades.
Between now and July 8, a lot of teams are looking to shed salary in the hopes of luring Lebron. Only one team will do so. Both the Chicago trade and this trade raise the urgency for all other suitors. The Knicks and the Heat must be hearing about this trade and thinking “shit, how do we one-up that?” And meanwhile, they know the Wiz still have cap space and are happy to absorb contracts if they come with something good attached.
This is just idle speculation at this point. But if we end up landing Gallinari, I’ll give Ernie a lot of credit for setting that up.
by sierradave on Jun 29, 2010 3:16 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
good points
after hearing about this trade it was hard not to wonder what other teams are trying to dump players.
by Johnnie Futbol on Jun 29, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
And that would end up being a BIG caveat
If the Knicks go on to make that trade with someone else, I’ll be extra-pissed.
Guess the question is how sure are we that Ernie will never go there.
Yi at Center?
I posted this on the last thread, with no luck. What’s important is that his status on the team is relative.
Is it possible to put him at center?
McGee is inconsistent, raw, and unproven. Yi, at least, is less inconsistent, raw, and unproven. It’s not giving up too much to have Yi start at center, but cover power forwards (have Blatche on Centers, perhaps?). Two things lost: McGee’s ability on the break and alley-oops, but Yi’s no slouch. McGee’s freakish block shots; but, considering his foul-proclivity and jump-fake foolishness, it’s a zero-sum game at best.
I think Yi at Center of McGee is a possibility.
He played sparingly there last year
according to 82games, he was better there than at PF, though the small sample size should be accounted for. Likely, it’s because he was surprisingly worse at jump shots than you’d think.
Ridiculous Upside, where developing talent and winning are not mutually exclusive.
So Why Haven't we fired Grunfeld yet?
That’s a better question what makes you think that his method have truly changed, old habits die hard and we never made it deep in the playoffs the past decade. To Reiterate it seems like the same old Ernie up to his old tricks again.
Good luck to Phil Chenier trying to pronounce "Jianlian"
Yi Jianlian… you the man you the man! That’s the reason I’m a Bullets fan!
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!
by OleksiyPecherovsHomeboy on Jun 29, 2010 3:26 PM EDT reply actions
Forget Phil
hearing Buck say it has pretty much been the highlight of any Wizards-Nets games from the last two years.
Ridiculous Upside, where developing talent and winning are not mutually exclusive.
i think the real story is we cant give nick young away!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 3:29 PM EDT reply actions
I'm not sure I would want to give Nick Young away
I love the way he improved once given playing time down the stretch. He’s also become a solid defender, and he’s doing less of his stupid one-on-one crap.
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!
by OleksiyPecherovsHomeboy on Jun 29, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions
It made me laugh
to hear all of the commentators say that the worse case scenario for Paul George is Nick Young.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions
his problem
is that he doesn’t seem to be able to contribute in the 10 minute a night role. That’s where we’ll need him. It seems like if he’s not starting or if he doesn’t hit his first shot or two, then he’s hurting the team.
True
But I still wouldn’t want to give him away unless we could get someone like Rudy Fernandez for him, which is highly unlikely.
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!
by OleksiyPecherovsHomeboy on Jun 29, 2010 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Couldn't this also be a way...
To protect the team if Blatche is out longer than expected with the foot? We may need someone to hold down the PF spot for awhile.
I’m like most here in that this deal makes me yawn. I would think, however, that he’s a more valuable trade asset than Ross. Yeah, he makes more, but he might actually get on the court occassionally; and he’s real tall and a recent high pick. Those kind of guys remain intriguiging to teams.
NICK YOUNG IS A SPACE CADET
HE PLAYS LIKE HIS ANGRY DRUNK ABUSIVE FATHER IS IN THE STANDS READY TO BEAT HIM AFTER THE GAME.
NICK’S GOT ALL THE TALENT IN THE WORLD, BUT HIS BRAIN AND CONFIDENCE AINT THERE.
TIS IS LIFE. HE’S SPORTS PSYCH 101.
Personally I like the all-caps
when I see an all-caps post I know that I can just not waste my time reading it. A handy tool for screening out bad posts.
by MR on Jun 29, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Which is why we need
A “dislike/thumbs down” button that will hide the post after 2 or 3 clicks unless you specifically click on it.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 29, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions
a ok move by us
only if it helps us get ready for the melo sweepstakes next season. if im not mistaken yi has 1 year left with option for a 2nd year correct? oh also any news on the josh howard front are we going to excerise our team option or let him go into free agency?
Mike Green in regular season- Norris Canadiate. Mike Green in Playoffs- Nowhere to be found
free agency
the team is for around 11 million which the Wiz cannot afford anymore. Either way he’s not worth that much. Almost definitely not on the team next year.
Personally I think Jianlian Yi was a good move for the Wiz
We basically got this guy for free since the Nets also paid $3mil to reimburse us the difference between Yi and Ross’ salaries. Not sure if anyone was keeping up, but Yi was on a tear in the second half of the season after missing most of the first half with an injury. Been noticing a lot of negativity on the site since the draft, but think Yi could become a valuable player in our rotation especially if Blatche has off nights or regresses in his progress altogether. My only concern at this point is our play at the 3 spot. We still need someone who can play that position on a full time basis. I think Childress would be a perfect compliment to what we are attempting to build, but last I heard, those talks have stalled. Not sure what the back up plan would be should it fall through altogether….
by TheRealBigMike on Jun 29, 2010 4:09 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Sign JHo at a discount?
…and do patchwork for the first 1.5 months of the season.
by oatmealeater on Jun 29, 2010 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions
isnt he out most of the season on rehab?
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Just a guess
But they go after Travis Outlaw for the mid-level. Feel like he’s been connected to the Wiz before.
I'm with you up to a point
I don’t think Yi is very good, and I’m confident he won’t be with us beyond next summer.
With that said, we aren’t going to use the cap space this year, he’ll get more burn than QR (maybe not a lot more), is a more valuable deadline chip (though we probably won’t want to take anyone on), and might help us win a game or two.
It’d be nice if we had gotten a second round pick or something, but doing this deal is clearly better than not doing it.
I like it.
This guy’s going to be a fan favorite before long, much like Singleton became, but in a different way. And I wouldn’t be so quick to say that he’s definitely not a “tough” player. Injury prone so far, but from what I’ve seen from him, he doesn’t back down from anyone and he’s got some unexpected swagger to boot.
He’ll be a nice big coming off the bench and could provide some offense. In my head, he’s what Pecherov was supposed to be all along.
But then, I’m not really coming at this offseason the way the majority of the intellectual-types are. I still am on the Fire Ernie side of things, but it’s pretty easy to blast any move post-John Wall at this point, and that’s fine. Just not very fun that way.
Like I said, my money is on Yi being a fan favorite. I can smell a Prada change-of-heart post way down the road. ;)
i hope he turns out to be a decent center. i dont see him at the 3 or 4 and we need a center!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Most of the commenters here have endorsed the strategy
of “Bring Out Your Dead”. Why then are you surprised that the new players we’re trading for are all stiffs?
Yi is an expiring. He brings the Chinese market to the table, as pointed out above, and is a body on the roster; we’re still stuck short of the league minimum by 5 or 6. We got him nearly for free and got rid of a practice player in return. Yi may or may not be as terrible as most of you are saying—in the games we played against NJ last year, I saw some distinct signs of improvement. But that would be icing on the cake, anyway. A major part of the BOYD strategy is sucking for a year or two. The Wizards are definitely on course to do that. What else did you all think would happen? You improve this way by stocking up on lottery picks for several years in a row.
We’re not getting Lebron. But we’re sure as hell sticking it to Cleveland by freeing up other teams to bid for him. Look for a deal with Miami (Beasley) or New York (Curry) next, just to let the Cavs have a real taste of DC…
The idea of trading for stiffs
is that they come with another asset, like a draft pick.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
But what are we getting back
we just seem to be renting a roster space. This doesn’t give us any assets.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
by Sean Fagan on Jun 29, 2010 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Ask yourself what nationality Ovechkin is
Look for a lot of foreign players in emerging markets on any Leonsis team. Foreign marketing sales mean extra revenue. Extra revenue means more money to pay off luxury taxes in a year or two after FA binge signings.
As I said, we will suck hugely next year. Seriously, what else did you ever expect?
Not to get too far off-topic
but Ovechkin wasn’t exactly the first Russian to play for the Capitals. I don’t think that example transfers.
Ridiculous Upside, where developing talent and winning are not mutually exclusive.
Yeah, and Ovenchkin is nominally the best player in the NHL
Its apples to oranges. If I thought there was pipeline of young Chinese talent, I’d be all for this. I understand the marketing appeal, but I didn’t see either Milwaukee or NJ “grow the brand” because of Yi’s arrival.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
You may have a point
But I don’t think one year of Yi is going to lead to a vast market penetration of China. Having a good team will.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
I should also clarify my position
This trade does nothing for me, either positively or negatively. It strikes me as “a move to make a move,” rather than having any overall positive effects. Grunfeld is taking another swing at another project big, but it doesn’t hurt us long term…so meh. I think the “China market” issue is being a bit overplayed. For example – look at these jersey sales:
So if Yao is selling only 10th in his home country, I’m not buying the Yi argument from a marketing standpoint.
However, what does bother me is that Grunfeld is not letting the market take shape before taking on the money due to Yi. With everyone wanting to make a huge splash, there are going to be a great many little fishes not getting love this summer. Some of those little fishes could be signed to decent contracts, and use as trade chips or to build a competitive team. I’m thinking of players like Reddick ect.
I think we may have pulled the trigger a bit too early. But hey, this is more of a “little harm, no foul” move.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
Actually, I pretty much agree with you
I’m indifferent to the trade, too. But no matter what else Grunfeld does, he has to stockpile bodies for training camp. Period. That’s all this trade amounts to: a free body for the roster. Personally, I wanted to see him A. Fill up the roster more from the draft and B. Get more future picks with BOYD trades. I commented here complaining about that the day after the draft. But this is not a terrible move—I was pointing out above why (I think) they made it.
And don’t underestimate Grunfeld’s desire to screw the Cavs. He’s proved it twice in less than a week. Sending us the player we wanted for Jamison instead of Ilgauskus on a yoyo string isn’t looking quite so cute right now in Cleveland.
Or who knows? Maybe it’s Leonsis screwing with Gilbert. Nobody’s yet thought of that, have they?
But when a "move to make a move"
sacrifices 3 million in cap space, that is a bad move is it not?
There is no real cost in trading for Yi, but the opportunity cost is that in taking on Yi we lose 3 million that we could have used in another BOYD trade to acquire a young (younger than 25) talent or a draft pick.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 29, 2010 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm pretty sure that EG
Actually sees Yi as an under 25 “young talent.” Sure it’s mostly “potential” rather than talent, but don’t act like we haven’t seen this song and dance with EG before.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 29, 2010 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Moreover
You know who sells a bunch of jerseys and shoes in China? Lebron James. If we really, REALLY wanted to promote overseas merch/marketing expansion, we would have gone all in for either James or wade. Furthermore, I think that the Chinese populace is smart enough to figure out that they shouldn’t get too excited about a guy who isn’t much better than a 7th or 8th man.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
John Wall and Yi in Chinatown
The corny story practically writes itself. The Great Wall of Chinatown with the Great Hope of China. But seriously though, the BOYD strategy is a term thats thrown around on here like a football in the Superbowl (yea, that sucked) and this is a BOYD trade in the purest sense. This is not a basketball move, however it can be because Yi can and will contribute next year and Quinton Ross couldn’t, heck he couldn’t contribute last year. Decent trade, I say.
Go Redskins! Go Wizards! Go Nationals! Go Capitals! Vamos United!
So sayeth Ernie:
“This trade is a good opportunity to add a skilled seven-footer with significant NBA experience who was the sixth overall pick in the draft just three years ago…Yi fits in very well with our ongoing plan of building towards the future with a core of young, talented players.”
Sounds more like Yi’s a component of the new Wizards and less a by-product of the BOYD strategy.
Haven't we had a discussion
about how it doesn’t matter where a player is drafted? The Candy Man was drafted 1st, would I want him on my team? No.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
of course it doesnt…a bad team made a bad decision and drafted him too high. they stayed bad and traded him to another bad team and got better. his new team, which was bad, stayed bad and traded them to our bad team. that is where we are at,,,to be continued!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I would have taken Candy in his 4th year in exchange for a 12th man.
by MR on Jun 29, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions
good point MR
but would you take Candy at 6 million for a 12th man at 1 million? Again, it feels like we are shuffling deck chairs.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
candy made max contract money in his day- i’d pass. the point of the comment was that draft position does not reflect current value three years down the road. current performance does!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions
And the real point is
You’ve traded a 12th man at your deepest position for perhaps an 8th or 9th man (who started around 50 games each year for teams with approximately the same talent level as the Wiz) at a position that you are thin.
Sacrificing 3mil in cap space that you’re probably saving for next year anyway.
Worst case scenario is a 1 year rental. Best case is that he develops into something we want to keep.
by MR on Jun 29, 2010 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
you switched back on me. you asked if we would take candy in his fourth year and swap for a 12th man. and i said no i would not because he was earning max or damn near max salary then. and he burned a whole in the teams cap.
reg yin…i am neutral on the trade. i understand the low risk and know he might still improve. i really hope he can develop into a center bec i remember him being a little slow and akward laterally. he is not a big hit salary wise. he did cost us the trade exception which probably could have fetched more value than yin.
really, as i dig deeper to how i feel, i think it is more of a timing issue with me. we are a week after the draft and free agency has not even begun. but we have used up almost all our available cap space and one of our two trade exceptions. people feel that this year will have fireworks with some teams left out and others scrambling to catch up…so if this trade were to occur in august, after the dust had settled a bit, and we felt that ernie patiently considered his options and after exercising a little patience to determine the fair value of our available assets. if he did that, and said this is the best trade for us. i would be fine with it…and even probably come close to really liking it. but he did not. he drafted wall and started trading away. now we have what- a couple million left and one trade exception and free agency hasnt even started yet! i think that is what is burning the biggest hole in me.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions
and i dont think for one second we know we wouldnt be significantly better long term had we just kept # 30 and # 35
so yeah- it is the timing and lack of patience. i would have been just as happy with using the assets we started before the trades began. even more estatic if we could have bought another first and/or second rounder for 2-5mm cash. or more aggressively pursued the many good players who did not even get drafted
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions
The value of our cap space will go WAY down
as soon as Bosh, James, Wade, JJ, Amare decide where they are going.
After that we will not be able to take players like Yi for just cap space.
So, no I don’t think we’re lacking patience, but taking an opportunity. July 1 is in 2 days.
by MR on Jun 30, 2010 6:58 AM EDT up reply actions
4th year Olowokandi
made $4,662,471…being the rookie contract of the number 1 pick in the day. That is hardly burning a hole even in 2001-2002 when the NBA salary cap was 42.5 million
i am wrong on how much he made. i thought he signed for something closer to 8-10mm. maybe that was what he was asking???
so are you saying that yin is comparable to candy? he was the top prospect in his draft class and was physically much stronger than yin. and we need a center that can defend, not just block shots and get backed up to the rim every play.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not comparing Yi to Kandi
in terms of how they play. I think the argument was that trading someone who won’t play (Ross) for a prospect (Yi) is worth it. Then the argument turned into…well Yi costs too much so it’s not worth it. Olwokandi in his fourth year is a prospect with potential maybe worth the chance of getting rid of a player like Ross for the money which was 4.6 million at the time
i agree with you. i thought Kandi came into play because EG suggested he had potential because he was the #6 pick three years ago. then someone said it does not matter where they were drafted- which i agree with.
whether yi is or is not anything to us ever, he was not that expensive. i prefer a more patient approach as free agency has not even started so teams might not be reaching as much as they will in a month.
in the end, this is getting so much traction bec it is the summer doldrums!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions
If we sign his qualifying offer
I will be apoplectic.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
i get the sense that these guys are pieces to the puzzle and ernie- loathe to admit he makes a mistakes- resigns them. the guy will do or say anything to save his job!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe
but to his credit he didn’t exercise the team option on Foye, cutting loose that mistake.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions
In the face of contrary evidence announced just this very day
les boulez bomber gets a dope slap.
by MR on Jun 29, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I do agree with him
that Ernie does seem to be talking them up as pieces to the puzzle.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
u dont have to like my opinions. but dont get personal
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I have no problem with the opinion, just the irony of the timing.
nothing personal intended. Really I just found it amusing.
thats cool… chest pump! it was ironic. i think it was the last story posted- lol. but i really form my impression on his body of work- which is really mediocre and mixed. i know i m hard on ernie. but i feel completely betrayed after learning the locker room culture he let fester. no team in any sport has any chance of competing with the crap he brushed under the rug going on. i would have fired him a long time ago because you have no business being a general manager if you cant manage. now i feel he is under a microscope and is making moves that will keep him from being fired more than help us put together a contending team creatively. i might be wrong on the second part, and hope to be. ironically, if he can move arenas and not take on any additional headaches (like a VC) the i think he would have done a fantastic job. so it is still early but we are running out of assets.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions
yes he did…and it was the right move and i applaud him for it. my opinions are based on the entirety of his body of words and work. he has made many good moves. overall, i still believe he will do and say whatever he has to do to keep his job! and a GM with his back against the wall is a dangerous GM to a team.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions
and we still have never won more than 45 games. to me he is a safe GM…get them close to .500 quickly…and keep ur job.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions
The Great Wall... to China... Two points!
...one of those guys who reads all the time but barely comments
by Juice over Whine on Jun 29, 2010 4:35 PM EDT reply actions
ernie is full of crap. the guy has been in the league three years…hardly significant. he’s 7 feet tall on crappy teams and has consistently been 10% of their offense and 10-15% of their rebounding and is a defensive meh.
i strongly hope JW can open things up for him offensively and he can turn into a defensive center to complement his ok offense.
we really did not give up much for him and he seems to be of high character. so i like the trade barring nothing better was available. much ado about nothing with some hope for upside!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 4:39 PM EDT reply actions
Yi age controversy (are we really adding "young talent"?)
“In 2007, a Chinese government registration site made public by hackers showed Yi’s date of birth as being in 1984,61 and in December 2008, a Chinese reporter discovered school registration forms that listed Yi as being born in 1984.62”
yeah i actually read that somewhere too
so technically yi isnt a prospect
by Young Wook Lee on Jun 29, 2010 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions
By the way...
Have the Wiz made a decision on Josh Howard yet? lol, I’m assuming they don’t want to pay him the 11 mil next year. Thank goodness for the team option there.
My swag was phenomenal.
Good Trade...
Grunfield did something right and that is adding young players. How many people was ready to give up on Blatche, before he became “7 Day Dray” and greatly improved. Plus I love what we are doing with loading up on bigs, because you need that if you want to compete for a CHAMPIONSHIP. Of all the bigs we signed so far this offseason, if we can get at least one of them to be good starter then this will be the offseason that turned this franchise around for many years to come.
by ATLredskin on Jun 29, 2010 5:08 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
i thought beasley was a head case…ernie has not been going that route so far. i hope it is a conscience decision and why we are less than thrilled working within that limitation.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Yi vs Beasley
They both play PF so I dont see room to add Beasley with all our other prospects at that position. Who would you rather have from a basketball stand point?
by forthepeople on Jun 29, 2010 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Yi.
I don’t see Beasley ever being a star (to me he’s a Glenn Robinson, lot’s of offensive talent but not a winner by any stretch of the imagination), and Yi is less likely to be a bad influence. Yeah, that character crap gets overblown, but Beasley is clearly someone who cares more about partying than winning. Not to mention, Yi will be one and done if he sucks.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 29, 2010 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Ho hum trade
So the team got a little better — statistically Yi is capable of contributing, to the tune of 13 and 8 per 36, and is a 7-footer. Those things make him more valuable than Ross on the court. That said, I don’t think he’s really a prospect. By many accounts, he’s 25 or 26 years old, and he can’t seem to stay healthy for a full season. He’ll add some revenue to the team and improve the on-court product at no cost, so I think it’s a shrewd business move that only costs the Wizards a couple million in salary cap flexibility for one year (that the might not use anyway). I don’t see it hurting the team long-term, and I think Yi has a better chance of making a long-term contribution than Ross does.
by steadyhand on Jun 29, 2010 5:28 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
So when Wall throws an alley oop to Yi, can we then call it “The Great Wall of China”?
"However, the true greatness of the Ravens’ line lies in their malevolence, led by right end Haloti Ngata. Simply put, Ngata can’t be blocked by mere mortals. He is not a product of the human species. He is really a creation of a building contractor, made of cinderblocks and some type of flesh-like covering. Throw in Kelly Gregg at nose tackle and behemoth rookie Terrence Cody and you have something truly frightening."
A character building first round loss will ensue
We can build on this!
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 29, 2010 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions
The more I think about it, the more I like this move
Yi could still turn into something. I wouldn’t bet in it, but i’s a possibility. But he’s certainly an upgrade over Q. Ross from a trade-chit perspective.
What this suggests to me is that there aren’t plans to use up all our cap space this offseason. And that’s fine, we weren’t really expecting to. (though I do wonder about the Childress rumors.)
In that case, this is a solid BOYD trade. Yi is 7 feet tall, and he will have at least one game this season where he scores 20 points. That’s exactly the type of player who can provide a nice deal-sweetener down the line. You can’t teach tall, and Yi has a lot more tall than Q. Ross.
Pulling a draft pick out of them as well would’ve been sweet, but the only way it would’ve happened is if it was protected to the level of the Navarro-Memphis deal. And that would’ve done us no good since WHEN Lebron and company don’t settle into NJ, the Nets will be stuck as a lousy team for the better part of a decade. So instead they gave our owner enough money to make it an even swap, talent for talent, with us taking a cap hit that isn’t going to hurt us.
And again, I’m really excited about the game theoretic potential of this move. Look for NY and Miami to at least fiddle with additional space-clearing moves in the next week. If we can be the beneficiary of one of those (maybe nabbing Galinari) then it’ll be an out-and-out heist.
and maybe orlando…gilbert gilbert gilbert
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Now I'm really confused
First – they trade for Hinrich – and I thought they paid too much ($27 Million) to pick up the 17th pick in the draft… Sure, HInrich can still play… but he doesn’t exactly fit in with the concept of a “rebuilding” team.
So then the Wizards swap two picks to move up and take Booker – in my opinion, they reached for Booker… and perhaps could have purchased the 25th pick to get him, rather than give up the 30 & 35…
But the Wizards (well, actually Ted Leonsis) came out after the draft and said they got significantly stronger defensively… and got players with some attitude…
OK – I get it… the “Plan” is to turn this once defensively deficient team into a team that doesn’t get pushed around…. more defensive oriented. Fewer softies on the roster… Some tough guys (Hinrich, Seraphin, Booker, etc…) – OK… I’m with the program…
Then they trade a defensive minded guy for Yi Jianlian?
uhhhhh………….. Did I miss the memo that we’re going back to an Offensive minded team filled with soft, outside shooting non-rebounding big men?
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
The thing I just realized and makes me sad
Is that the chances of the Wizards retaining Singleton are now nil. I’m not sure why we are willing to let a “little things” guy go while acquiring a another project.
The artist formerly known as ledellforlife.
you want draft picks
but draft picks, outside of the top 10 which no one is giving up for free, are all projects.
by JonathanJoseph on Jun 29, 2010 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions
If we spend big on a mentor for the guards
and then eliminate our shot at retaining Singleton, that will be quite the contradiction. Singleton’s our only non-knucklehead veteran big and giving that up is not worth renting Yi (zero talent, zero upside) for a year.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 30, 2010 8:02 AM EDT up reply actions
great evaluation of Yi
I’m thinking a future at draft express!! Kevin Seraphin (he’s fat, I don’t like him and he doesn’t speak English), Trevor Booker (is small, stayed in college too long so he can’t get much better), Hamandy N’dyiaye (I never heard of him, but he plays for Rutgers and they suck)
It doesn't matter whether Ross was a defensive minded guy
He never, ever would have gotten off the bench. Besides, Yi is a good trade chip.
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!
by OleksiyPecherovsHomeboy on Jun 29, 2010 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions
because he can be marketed in china??? lol (i do agree w u!)
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions
you know…i was thinking about that earlier. and i think maybe the idea is that these physical but undersized guys hopefully can toughen up the guys with potential but are soft in practice. and if not, play the best matchups and i would be surprised if they thought out a plan B other then let their contracts roll off!
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions
YI (E)
Not really a bad trade for the zards. He is a 7 footer with a good jumpshot. If Wall is as good on this level at getting guys open shots then Yi could be somewhat of a matchup problem- spreading the floor. Sure he has liabilities, but he does have some strengths and, it is on FLIP to make them translate on the court. He could be a good role player for us plus, it gives us depth upfront.
by mikereese on Jun 29, 2010 10:11 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
and he seems to be a good guy who will practice hard and not be a knucklehead…all of which i like
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions
It's not a bad trade, especially
It just makes me yawn a little. Ross wasn’t going to contribute, but I’m not kidding myself about Yi’s “potential”. With a guy who’s been in the league a few years, you need not discuss potential.. you have the “actual”, as in, actual stats to show what he can and can’t do. And this guy can’t do a lot.
Kind of like
we shouldn’t have ditched Blatche after 3 years? Not saying that Yi has some major potential, but you never know. He’s certainly skilled for a 7 footer.
by Team Serbia on Jun 29, 2010 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions
i think andre was a lot younger after 3 years and one of them was spent rehabbing a gunshot wound to his back. he also is a lot less mature.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions
but i agree, he might improve. generally i think it is a good strategy to get someone like him for a year or two to see how hard he wants to be here and works to improve
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions
I hope you're right
But when a guy gets traded this often in 3 years, it’s not a good sign.
And I’m not saying that Blatche should’ve been traded after 3 years, either (it is remarkable to see how similar his numbers were last year to Yi’s). But I’m also not saying that I have a lot of faith in Blatche’s potential, either. My point is simply that ordinarily, you know who a player is by now, especially when they’re getting significant minutes.
The difference is that Dray's per-minute production was good, and he didn't get PT
Whereas Yi’s per-minute production stinks, and he has gotten PT.
Well there certainly have been some precedence for players who turned it around
Chauncey Billups and Joe Johnson comes to mind. Both players were drafted high, and then dumped by the team that drafted during their rookie season. Billups was actually traded 3 times in his first 2 years in the league.
Both Billups and Joe Johnson had subpar PER’s as well, much like Yi.
We have no idea how Yi will turn out and how much of his potential he will ever tap, but there is certainly precedence for highly touted / high draftees that got dumped right away because they weren’t paying immediate returns to the teams that drafted them, only to turn into All-Star players a few seasons later through a lot of hard work and good opportunities.
Playing on a young team with John Wall will certainly open up some opportunities for Yi and we’ll have to see if he can capitalize on it. What we do know, as many have posted, is that Yi is very skilled for a 7 footer and no matter how you look at it, the product on the court is improved by swapping Ross for Yi.
I think you should
analogize big men with other big men — the skill set and development is so fundamentally different than for guards that you need a more similar comparison to be able to point to precedence.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 30, 2010 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Let me just share something that just occurred to me
I’d give it a 50/50 chance that Yi is our starting PF on opening night.
Depending on Dray’s healing power.
Our projected starting lineup on opening night
Wall
Arenas
Thornton?
Yi
McGee
We’d have to score at least 160 points to win.
by Jake Whitacre on Jun 29, 2010 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm sure
McGee has spent the summer ignoring the weights and instead working on that 3pt fade away shot…so 160pts is well within reach!
haha…but i have not heard of a lot of you tube music posts this summer…just a ironic twitter on draft night…fingers crossed. i think with the moves we have made, if he did not know before, he should now…nothing is being held open for him
by les boulez bomber on Jun 29, 2010 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions
maybe the Wiz are getting more foreign players
so that McGee won’t have English speaking friends to goof off with….
I dont mind have a guy
that will probably drop 20+ a dozen or more times this coming season, depending on his minutes. Hes a strech four. He is not great, but I think he is legit backup and will be better if he understands his role. He’s young, too, supposedly.
If we cant acquire a guy like Childress because of it though i oppose this trade completely.
Why?
So he can take up minutes that all these young big men we have should be getting?
I would have loved to bring Haywood back before the draft
But with all the big men that we got, it’s just not possible.
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE!
by OleksiyPecherovsHomeboy on Jun 30, 2010 1:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Wizards in China
I think that’s a underrated part of this trade. Gil’s jersey was the sixth highest seller in China because the Wizards came there last summer and were also the first NBA team to visit China 30 years ago.
I currently live in China, in Yi’s home province in fact, and while I wouldn’t say the zards have a fan base here, the Chinese guys I ball with are at least conscious of the Wizards, which is something you can’t say for a lot of teams outside the Lakers, Rockets, and Cavs.
Also, Yi isn’t seen as a scrub here. He may not be a star in the NBA yet but he is one of only 2 Chinese players in China, so there is a definite rooting for him. This trade could take the Wizards to Rocket like status here, who have every game of theirs shown on TV here, which would give John Wall an immediate international following, the fanbase in China would translate to revenue coming in to the team, translating into a greater willingness for the front office to spend on the team, buy draft picks, and pay the luxury tax.
Yi also had career highs in points and boards last year, and gives us an outside shooter that stretches the floor for Wall’s penetration, which we all agreed before the draft was something we severely lacked and needed. And if he regresses or doesnt improve again this year, hes gone, and we get our cap space back.
Im pretty pumped about this trade, and not just because it means I’ll be able to watch a ton more Wizards games on TV here next season.
by samthemantis on Jun 30, 2010 1:57 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
You are personally the #1 prime beneficiary of this trade
by MR on Jun 30, 2010 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions
True that!
If we can get at least one person excited about this trade I’m all for it!
"I get buckets, son!" Big Oily
by WhiteBoy-4-3 on Jun 30, 2010 7:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Good points!
samthemanties great points!
I was just thinking that ironically. I think people are underestimated how great this trade is, in a revenue enticing sense. I mean anything to create positive attention toward this team is going to be helpful. I also notice a trend in all championship teams. Good PG and alot of scorers and bruisers. Right now with Arenas, Wall, and Blatche we have a pretty good core of scorers. With the new big men, plus McGee we have some bruisers. And obviously you hope Wall springs out to be an amazing PG along with “cringe” Hinrich.
I am still PRAYING we dont trade Arenas. Hate it if you want but I guess I have a dream of seeing one last semi-successful, exciting, competitive, badass season with Agent 0 included.
Why did Grunfeld make this move now?
Wouldn’t the Nets get more desperate as free agency approached? How many other teams were lining up for the chance to grab Yi for cap space?
Ernie loves the trade-well-before-the-deadline. I think it’s because he has dinner reservations or a tee time.
July 1 is in 2 days
Some of these teams are going to be not so keen to trade talent for cap space at that point.
by MR on Jun 30, 2010 7:03 AM EDT up reply actions
It wasn't going to get much better than this with the Nets...
Sure it would have been nice to get Terrence Williams instead of Yi…. but that was not happening… and they already had shipped Chris Douglas-Roberts to the Bucks.
So if you are ok with the general strategy of taking on short term contracts (and the cash to help pay from them) from teams wanting to clear cap space as a way to fill out the roster for this season… this is an OK deal.
This could mean
that they are thinking Booker should play SF.
I doubt it
Booker was pretty adamant that he wanted to play inside, not on the perimeter, in yesterday’s press conference.
The power forwards he is going to guard are adamant that he should play power forward, too
Best case scenario — he plays PF on offense, SF on defense.
The Wizards have to sell tickets you know
Its a business in the end. Losing Ross and not being able to sign Singleton is water under the bridge. Those guys come a dime a dozen. Find me another Chinese swing man who is the second most popular player in China. In the mixing bowl that is DC Yi is going to put some butts in seats.
I see some humor in this trade
Here in BF land, I see that easily more than 70% are for the trade, and most are happy we got rid of Ross, and picked up another young “asset”… for essentially “no” cost (with the $3 Million that the Nets gave the Wizards to offset Yi’s salary.)
Over at SB Nation’s Nets blog Nets Daily, they’re running probably 90% FOR the trade…. Most are glad they were able to “dump” Yi on an unsuspecting Wizards team; while simultaneously getting closer to signing two max free agents – and that they were able to get back a perimeter defender (in Ross).
One man’s trash……..
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
1) They haven’t seen Ross play
2) They are happy about the possibility of big FAs. They won’t be so happy if their cap space turns into nothing.
by MR on Jun 30, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
If we had traded Pech and created cap space through that to sign a big FA, we would have been thrilled too. Now imagine if instead of a 23 year old Pech we had traded a 24/25 year old Pech (Yi’s actual age), we would have been ecstatic.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 30, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Yi's better than Pech
I don’t think Yi is about to blossom into a star, but c’mon… Pech had 1 assist all year for us, and never had a good game. Yi is inconsistent, but has at least shown flashes.
And +1 to MR’s point about the FAs. They’re happy now because they’re in fantasyland about making a splash on the FA market.
Well lets check back over at the Nets Blog
after they don’t get Bron Bron or anybody else to speak of. Then they will be painting the turd all season talking about how Ross is such a great hustle/glue guy.
Yi is apparently a defensive no show…and if u cant play defense, u have no business being on the team…sorry gil
he is too slow to play anything but center so i hope he finds a home there, beefs up, and learns to play D
by les boulez bomber on Jun 30, 2010 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I think we can pretty much assume...
the new unis will be red.
by mogoman on Jun 30, 2010 10:40 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Representing their country
I like players who are among the first from their country. The extra expectations on them from their countrymen back home help keep them practicing hard and inhibit any screwing around.
Also, Yi should help with marketing much more than his jersey sales indicate. Remember that the government has control over what gets shown on TV in China. Yi’s games will get shown on TV over there because the Chinese government likes him, and that TV exposure is what leads to sponsorship deals. However, the Wiz do have to be competitive and/or entertaining, unlike the Bucks and the Nets teams that Yi has played for. Sponsors never want to be associated with a loser.

by 

























