Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: FSU To Big 12 'Inevitable,' According To Report

2010 NBA Draft Prospect Profile: Dominique Jones

Editor's Note, by rook6980: This is the 17th installment in a series of regular postings on draft prospects.  This series will take a look at the top draft prospects for the 2010 NBA Draft in June. The plan is to have one or two a week, leading up to a flurry of activity the week of the draft. My DVR is crammed full of college games, and I'm watching and writing as fast as I can.

Let's jump around a little bit. With the Wizards bringing in six players for workouts this week, I thought I'd take a look at some that might actually be available when the Wizards pick at #30 & #34. First up is Dominique Jones.

Dominique Jones 

  • PG/SG
  • 21 Years Old
  • 6'4, 205 lbs
  • South Florida, Junior
I have to admit, I only saw three South Florida games this year, but in all of them Dominique Jones was a standout. About mid-season, I was watching Wes Johnson and Syracuse against South Florida. I had tuned in to the game to watch Johnson, a projected lottery pick - but I got mesmerized by a 6'4" South Florida guard named Dominique Jones. This guy shot from everywhere. Teardrops in the lane followed by NBA distance three-pointers. Jones drove the lane and threw his body around with a reckless abandon, getting fouled HARD and sometimes still making the shot. He ended up with 30 points (7-13 shooting), nine rebounds and three assists. His team just wasn't in the same league as Syracuse, and South Florida lost by something like 14 points.

The next time I watched a South Florida game, I did so with the explicit intent of keeping an eye on Dominique Jones. Against West Virginia, Dominique Jones was once again the best player on the court, scoring 28 points and grabbing seven rebounds, but his team just couldn't do anything to help him, and they lost by nine points. Finally, I watched him explode against Providence for 46 points, 10 rebounds and eight assists. South Florida was down by 12 points with two minutes to go when Jones led his team in a furious comeback, hitting big shot after big shot. The game finally went into overtime and in the OT session, he scored nine points to help secure the win for his team. It was perhaps the most impressive offensive performance I have seen all year.

More after the jump

Star-divide

Dominique Jones is a 6'4" combo guard with a terrific first step and a powerful NBA ready body. He reminds me of a mini Tyreke Evans; but perhaps with a bit less explosive jumping ability. He's got great body control. He seemingly likes contact, both when he's going to the basket, and when he's defending.  He's got a long wingspan and large soft hands.

Jones was a very dangerous scorer in college, seemingly able to create his own shot with ease. He has a quick first step and terrific body control on his drives to the basket. He does an excellent job making decisions in the lane - where he can go up with the best floater in college today or go all the way to the rim. He's not afraid of contact, and frequently finishes, even through very heavy contact. He's a very aggressive offensive player, as evidenced by the fact that he gets to the foul line 9.2 times (per 40 minutes). When you’re 6-4, that's damned impressive.

Jones was a marked man this year at South Florida. Teams keyed their defenses at stopping him, knowing there was no one else on the team that could hurt them; and Jones still put that team on his back and carried them to a 20-13 record (9-9 in the Big East); averaging over 21 points, 6.1 rebounds and 3.6 assists per game.

He's a very good ball handler, able to drive both right and left. He is good enough ball handler to bring the ball up the court and get a team into its offense. He has some advanced ball handling skills (spins, crossovers, hesitations, behind the back, etc.) and is relentless in probing the defense for driving lanes. He's a better passer than he's given credit for. He keeps his head up on his drives and can find open teammates. He's also very good at the pick-and-roll game, able to find the big man rolling to the basket, or pulling up for a jumper. But having said all that, he's definately not the typical point guard type. He has a go-to scoring mentality of a shooting guard rather than the pass-first mentality of a point.

As for his jump shot, Jones has an excellent mid-range game - shooting the 12-18ft jumper with confidence and making a good share of them. From longer distance, though, his consistency falls off, and he becomes very streaky. Jones has good mechanics. His release is high, but he's rather slow. Because he doesn't have explosive leaping ability, he doesn't get tremendous lift from his legs; that, combined with the fact that at 6'4" he'll most likely be going up against taller, more athletic opponents in the NBA, he may have trouble consistently getting his shot off at the next level. He hit only 31% of his 3-point shots last year - so improving the consistency and range on his jump shot should be a high priority for him this summer.

On defense, Jones takes a good fundamental stance, and stays engaged with his opponent. He seems to take great pride in his defense, working extremely hard on that side of the court. He frequently defended the opponent's best perimeter scorer. He likes to get right into his man's grill and stay there. He's extremely strong, and is effective at fighting through screens.

Even though he's not an "elite" athlete, Jones comes up with a fair number of blocked shots, because he contests every shot. While he doesn't seem to have the quickness to keep up with the quickest guards, his solid fundamentals help to diminish that deficiency some what. He's got quick, active hands and averages almost two steals per game. He rebounds extraordinarily well for his size, grabbing an astounding 6.6 boards (per 40 minutes) - one of the best rebounding guards in the draft.

As far as intangibles go, Jones is reportedly a great leader and an extremely hard worker. Some of the terms I've seen thrown around are: Mature, Polished, Experienced, Competitive, Coachable, Tough, Determined, High energy, Gives max effort, Excellent work ethic, High Basketball IQ.

Strengths:

  • Strong player with a solid frame
  • Ability to create his own shot
  • Shows diverse offensive skills
  • Can create off the dribble
  • Right-handed floater
  • Good Pick-and-roll decision maker
  • Good mid-range game
  • Fundamentally sound
  • Advanced Ball Handling skills
  • Low mistake player
  • Good passer - excellent court vision
  • Can play on or off the ball
  • Can finish at the rim
  • Good FT Shooter (75%)
  • Gets to the FT line a lot
  • Solid defensive skills
  • Works hard on Defense
  • Excellent rebounder
  • Great intangibles
Weaknesses
  • Undersized for Shooting Guard
  • Not an explosive leaper
  • Inconsistent outside shot
  • Needs to get more lift on his jump shot
  • Needs to extend the range on his jumper
Dominique Jones has some NBA ready skills. He can create his own shot, he's a very good ball handler and he plays hard on defense. Although I don't think Jones will be a star, he could be the sleeper of the Draft if he slips to the second round. Every team needs a solid perimeter player coming off the bench that can score and defend. Jones can do both. I can see him filling several needs (Bench scorer, emergency back-up Point Guard, 2nd unit defensive stopper, etc.).  Most second unit shooting guards in the NBA are 6'5" or less - whereas most starters are 6'6" or bigger. Coming off the bench, he would be playing against opponents more his same size, and his shot creating abilities and defensive skills could be utilized to their fullest.

Previous Draft Profiles:

John Wall PG 6-4 195 Fr Kentucky Declared for the NBA Draft.
Evan Turner SG 6-7 217 Jr. Ohio St Declared for the NBA Draft.
Wesley Johnson SF 6-7 205 Jr. Syracuse Declared for the NBA Draft.
Derrick Favors PF 6-9 246 Fr. Ga. Tech Declared for the NBA Draft.
DeMarcus Cousins C 6-11 280 Fr. Kentucky Declared for the NBA Draft.
Al-Farouq Aminu F 6-8 218 Soph. Wake Forest Declared for the NBA Draft
Cole Aldrich C 6-11 245 Jr. Kansas Declared for the NBA Draft
Greg Monroe C 6-10 247 Soph. Georgetown Declared for the NBA Draft
Patrick Patterson F 6-8 235 Jr. Kentucky Declared for the NBA Draft.
Ed Davis F 6-10 225 Soph. North Carolina Declared for the NBA Draft.
Hassan Whiteside  C 7-0 235 Fr. Marshall Declared for the NBA Draft
Xavier Henry
SG 6-6 220 Fr. Kansas Declared for the NBA Draft.
Larry Sanders PF 6-10 220 Jr. VCU Declared for the NBA Draft.
Ekpe Udoh PF/C 6-10 240 Jr. Baylor Declared for the NBA Draft.
Stanley Robinson SF 6-8 220 Sr. UConn Senior - Eligible for the Draft
James Anderson SG 6-6 195 Jr. Oklahoma St. Declared for the NBA Draft.

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Watching him take down Georgetown

Scoring 22 of 29 in the second half was damn impressive. I love his demeanor on the court.

Maybe a cheaper replacement for Foye, if the Wiz decide to go that route?

by DT711 on May 15, 2010 1:01 PM EDT reply actions  

I've been high on Jones for a while

I love his aggressiveness and versatility. I think he is a very solid option for our second-rounder.

"Guess you guys aren't ready for that yet... but trust me, you're gonna love it." ~Marty McFly

by mr. 91 on May 15, 2010 1:10 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Rook

I’m not asking for a write up, but how do you (or anyone else) feel about Willie Warren? I know he has attitude issues, and I admittedly only really watched him during the 08-09 season when he was playing with the Griffin bros, but he seems to have lottery level talent. I remember him being pegged as high as the 10th overall pick on nbadraft.net, as recently as last fall. If Jones is gone at #30, you think he might he be worth a flyer at #34 (non guaranteed contract is a must for him)?

by DT711 on May 15, 2010 1:26 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't know

I think the Wizards should shy away from the following:

1. Anyone with off-court issues or red flags … (Issues with their Coaches, problems with teammates, illegal drugs, gun issues, etc…)

2. Don’t even consider drafting anyone that doesn’t at least pretend to play defense.

3. Let’s NOT draft guys that are “tweeners” (ie: too short for one position, not quick enough for the other, not strong enough for a third)… I think we’ve had enough of trying to turn guys like Randy Foye into a Point Guard… or playing a 5’5" shooting guard.

4. Let’s not draft guys where statements have been made like: “questionable Basketball IQ”, “Lack of focus”, “doesn’t always play hard”, “questionable maturity level”, or has had issues with his Coaches… or, or, or, or ….etc…

Why not concentrate on drafting guys that are good people, first and foremost. Guys that hustle and play with energy. Guys with great fundamentals. Guys with leadership qualities. Guys that are aggressive and give max effort on defense. Players that have the physical tools to play a particular position in the NBA. Players that are coachable, smart, and willing to learn. Players that are hungry, competitive and want to work their butts off to be the best.

Let’s let the Clippers, the Warriors and Timberwolves draft for “potential”, or purely on perceived “talent”…… Let them take the guys that have questionable work ethic…. or potential weight issues…. Let them draft the 6’2" Shooting Guard…. or the 6’7" Power Forward…. Let them draft the guys that don’s seem to “get it” ; and let them try to change them, or wait for the player to “develop”……..

So – in a short version…. NO to Willie Warren. (and Demarcus Cousins, and Patrick Patterson, and Daniel Orton, etc…)

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on May 15, 2010 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with pretty much everythin you said.

Except Cousins. I want to see him in a Wizards Uniform next year. Im also a big fan of Lance Stephenson.

by tw10 on May 15, 2010 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

So

Even though Cousins has had things like this said about him:
Questions about his maturity level
Poor Basketball IQ
Attitude problems
Off-court red flags
Doesn’t always play hard
Loses Mental Focus
Poor defensive fundamentals
Lazy
Undisciplined
Poor work ethic
Disinterested
Poor conditioning
Selfish
not the smartest guy you’ll find on or off the court
loses his temper
does not appear receptive to coaching
Tends to not hustle back on defense
Weight could be an issue if he does not learn to become disciplined

I don’t care how talented he is…. The last thing the Wizards need is to draft Derrick Coleman II.

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on May 16, 2010 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know his scouting report :p

I read DraftExpress a lot. IMO better than NBADraft.net However, I just cant help but thinking there is no way this guy isnt going to be an Allstar.

I know he is compared to Derrick Coleman and Eddy Curry, but I just feel theres no way he is gonna be the underachiever that those guys were. The only similarities I see between him and Eddy is the lowpost game. Both are(well, in Eddy’s case-WAS, for 1 year) smooth scorers, and it is impressive because of their size. Derrick was a damn good player for many years but he also shot a lot more jumpers than I think DeMarcus will.

On defense, I can see him being a Kendrick Perkins type. Kendrick get as many techs as the next guy, but he is also an enforcer so you take his attitude along with his good defense and rebounding. Cousins might not be as good a shotblocker, but I think he can be an even better rebounder than Kendrick.

He has also been compared to Al Jefferson, and again, I think that is a decent comparsin offensively but I just think DeMarcus has the lateral quickness to be a better defender.

The best comparison for DeMarcus I think is a bigger Zach Randolph. Zach often has trouble with his on-ball defense because he has often has to gaurd quicker, taller PF’s. DeMarcus will not have that problem because he will be matched up with centers and he is not undersized in terms of his height. On offense they are very similar. Both posses smooth jumpers although ZBo has more range. Both can score in the post although DeMarcus can finish stronger and dunk more. Another similarity is they are productive rebounders. They also both have red flags because of theyre character. I know Memphis is glad they took a chance on him.

If Demarcus is there at #3, I say we draft him.

by tw10 on May 16, 2010 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

But

Memphis didn’t gamble with a top-5 pick on Randolph. That is what you are asking the Wizards to do. Sure a mid-round to late round draft choice, you can take a flyer on someone with a large ceiling but questionable behavior. But this franchise cannot afford to miss with their likely top-5 pick.

by zeke5123 on May 16, 2010 10:16 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

cousins is a top 3 pick and would be shocked if he fell below 4. i hope we get him- nice complement to AB and mcgee.

i dont know anythng about off court red flags, but most of the others on the list are very similar- He was never challenged in college. That much is pretty clear. He was a man among boys physically and 20 years old mentally. He will be fine and be a solid pro, min (Perkins is an excellent comparison).

i hope we get him!

by les boulez bomber on May 17, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know what I am missing

And I didn’t watch any of his games, but you seemed to describe a lottery pick. Explosive scorer, good ball handler, great intangilbes, likes the ball in his hands come crunch time, rock solid defender. He’s a bit short for the 2. That and he didn’t play at a major school. That seems to be his deficines. I for one, would be thrilled to nab him from your write up at 30. Seems like a complete steal.

by zeke5123 on May 15, 2010 1:55 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Obviously - he has some weaknesses

not the least of which is his size… He is not the ideal size for an NBA starting Shooting Guard…

He is listed at 6’4", but I’d bet he’ll measure out at about 6’2" (in socks, so 6’3" in shoes) at the NBA Pre-Draft camp.

Another thing is that he isn’t what you’d call an elite athlete – which can sometimes make up for a guy being a couple of inches short of ideal…

Perhaps the most important thing is that he’s not as consistent as he should be… especially with his 3-point shooting…. In the NBA, your shooting guard should be able to consistently hit an open 3 point shot – - Jones is still too inconsistent…..

However, having said all of that – he still could be the sleeper of the draft…. He can’t grow 3 inches, but he can certainly work on his long range shooting…..

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on May 15, 2010 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

But

His biggest weakness is his size

Let’s face it, I think we’re all tired of starting 6’4" Shooting Guards when the rest of the league is starting guys 6’6", 6’7" and bigger…..

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on May 15, 2010 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wade is only 6'4"

I know this kid isn’t Wade. But if he can play good ball, the size won’t affect that. Just like Blair was undersized for a big guy, he was a great ball player. If Jones is a great ball player (and you made it sound like he is, minus the 3 point shooting, and good but not great atheltiscm) then pull the trigger. Measurables only matter at the extreme, if he was a 5’11" 2 guard, he’d be to small. But I’d rather have a 6’4" two-guard who can play, then a 6’6" specimen.

by zeke5123 on May 15, 2010 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm less concerned about his size

Than I am about his mentality – i.e. can he play a role. I’ll talk more about this tomorrow though.

BF on Twitter I BF on Facebook.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on May 15, 2010 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Size matters.No homo.

Like you said, this kid isnt Wade. How many other starting upper-echeleon(much less superstar-like wade) 6’4" shooting gaurds are there?

Not many. Guys like Ben Gordon and Courtney Lee are solid, but they are what they are. I think Eric Gordon and OJ Mayo have potential to become allstars, but they just finished sophmore campaigns in which they didnt improve much from their rookie seasons. Monta Ellis is the only other short shooting gaurd in the league right now besides Wade(Maybe Mayo could be a reserve in the East, but even if the Grizz were in the eastern conference…he is the 3rd option on a mediocre team) worthy of being an allstar.

Dominique reminds me a lot of the guy we sold last year, Jermaine Taylor. The differences being that he is less athletic, not as good of a defender but i think wil be a better scorer.

My point is that with a lot of these undersized shooting gaurds you are going to get what you are going to get. A lot of these guys are solid players, but must play in limited roles. The reason a guy like Wes Matthews can start as a rookie is because he is athletic enough and has the size to gaurd any shooting gaurd in the league.

I like the idea of drafting Willie Warren of Dominque Jones because I think taking either of them is going to do one of two things:

1. Motivate Nick Young…a consistent and focused Nick Young can start in the NBA. Nick is a solid defender when he wants to be and if he starts playing smarter on offense he can be a very good player.

2. Replace Nick Young….Nick has been good in streches as a bench scorer, and we picked up his third year option, but if he proves to be the same player as he was last year I wouldnt be surprised to see the Wiz let him walk after next season. Watching Jermaine Taylor made me a little dissapointed because I think his tenacity and physicality is something the Wizards could have used. I think Willie and Domique have the potential to be more productive in their first two years than Nick has been. Willie is also only 19…so I think we’d part with Nick.

by tw10 on May 16, 2010 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I thought the Cult of Nick Young

was destroyed when he couldn’t find a starting spot on a team of 3rd stringers, castoffs, and NBDLers. He is a taller Juan Dixon. That’s it. No more. He has no trade value. He has less value than a guy like Von Wafer.

Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!

by Sean Fagan on May 16, 2010 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well the team did re-sign him...

So I think they still have some faith left in him…

Personally i have given up looking at him as a starting caliber guy. i think he will always be what he is-an inconsistent bench scorer.

by tw10 on May 17, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

They picked up his option - they didn't re-sign him

BF on Twitter I BF on Facebook.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on May 17, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

i really liked his profile- esp late 1st/early 2nd. would be best if he learned to pass and play the point. but keep one think in mind- even though he is 6’4- he looks pretty solidly built. that is pretty imp because it will be harder for someone to push him aside to create space. if he is a solid defender and strong, he can affect shots even if he cant block them.

by les boulez bomber on May 17, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Draft talent...

I hope the Wizards draft talented players. Cookie-cutter players may not be the best.
Do the research. Use your gut instinct as a GM. Demarcus Cousins is going to be a
really good NBA player. His college production simply cannot be ignored!! I like all
the players others do not…The Zach Randolphs, Derrick Coleman. You should have seen Zack when he was on the Knicks. I thought he was Ewing!! People say bad things
about him, but I didn’t see those things. He just plays hard….could pass more. I can’t get with the Good Player-Good Person formula…it’s backwards and limiting.

by Herb Harris on May 16, 2010 3:22 AM EDT reply actions  

And this organization has a history

of drafting players with low basketball IQ’s, attitude and maturity issues, and with no commitment to playing defense – and completely turning them around, right?

So we should use our Lottery pick to draft a player with talent, but obvious issues with maturity level or attitude…. Guys like “party” John Ramos…. Nick Young (who obviously came into the league with a low Basketball IQ)…. JaVale McGee (ditto)…. or Andray Blatche (who finally seems to be “getting it” after 6 years) – because the Wiz are so good at developing that kind of player?

There are plenty of great, talented, mature, coachable, hard working players available in this draft…. and a only a couple with issues…. and you want to bypass those other players with great attitudes to draft a head case?

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on May 16, 2010 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with this

Rook and I tend to disagree a young player evaluations, but the Wizards need to stop trying to polish diamonds when the have little to no success doing so. Zach turned into a decent professional after burning his bridges at three different teams. Why do we always have to be the first stop on a headcase’s career?

Use the first pick on a surefire talent without issues and the second on an established college player who can bring stability to the team. No low basketball IQ, no run ins with Johnny Law.

Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!

by Sean Fagan on May 16, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

thats not my argument rook. where i differ is defining head case. i dont think a 20 year old who is obviously has superior size and talent to the point he is bored is a head case. i think he is a 20 year old kid. i think putting a cousins in the fold with blatche and mcgee is a GREAT motivator for the whole set. They will all be pushed and improve- with the end result being cousins will turn out a pretty good player

by les boulez bomber on May 17, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Less good person, more less risk. Taking cousins is risky because of his red flags. There is something to minimizing risk, even if you reduce the payoff.

by zeke5123 on May 16, 2010 10:12 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

THE SEASON is over but you dum MF still trying to knock nick, NICK have a dam good agent. THAT old saying be careful what you wish for, nick outta here, may come back to haunt you.

straight talk

by Mae.jude@yahoo.com on May 16, 2010 10:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Oh, I missed you Mae Jude

Nick, please stop paying attention to the boards and more attention to your game.

Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!

by Sean Fagan on May 16, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

hahahaah mae jude is hilarious.

by tw10 on May 17, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

BE KOOL, NO COMPLETE game, no complete player, ask KING JAMES.

straight talk

by Mae.jude@yahoo.com on May 16, 2010 3:17 PM EDT reply actions  

They can all play!!

I have great respect for you Rook, but the Wizzies you mentioned can all play and at
times dominate. Am I wrong? Think about Mcgee’s timely blocks! Nick Young’s
fadeaway or timely three pointers, and Blatche’s well rounded authority. Randoph was
a 20 & 10 player in Portland, when the Knicks traded him because of his contract, they
got worse! Good player 1st….if he’s a good person, even better!!

by Herb Harris on May 17, 2010 1:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

FanPosts


Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Ghanaouturuguaytrough_small M. Katz

Small Jeff Newman

Small jkahn15

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

402135_2504659589329_1638181922_1758918_1004201176_n_small Bullet Nation in Exile