2010 NBA Draft Prospect Profile: Xavier Henry
Editor's Note, by rook6980:
This is the 13th installment in a series of regular postings on draft prospects. This series will take a look at the top draft prospects for the 2010 NBA Draft in June. The plan is to have one or two a week, leading up to a flurry of activity the week of the draft. My DVR is crammed full of College games, and I'm watching and writing as fast as I can (between Wizards games). You can see my previous prospect profiles by clicking here.
We're getting into the range of players who will most likely not be in the Wizard's draft window. I will continue to profile as many players as possible, even players that have little chance of going in the top eight (Wizard's first pick) or in the bottom of the first round (Wizards second first round pick), because we never know what may happen. There are a lot of talented players in this draft, and you never know who may slip to #30, or even into the second round. And like last year, the Wizards might make a move with their first pick. Who knows?
Anyway, the point is that we should know who these players are, because however slight the chance, they still may end up putting on a Wizards cap come draft night. Most people say that the 2008 draft (with Rose, Beasley, Love, Mayo, Westbrook, the Lopez Brothers, Hickson, Mario Chalmers, Gallinari, etc.) was the best draft in years, but this draft may have more overall talent, top to bottom. There will be VERY GOOD players selected in the late first round, and into the early second round. Starting-quality players.
Xavier Henry
19 years old6'6"; 220 lbs.
Kansas, Freshman
Xavier Henry has a good pedigree. His father played for the Kansas Jayhawks in the 1980s. He went on to play professionally in Belgium. His mother played basketball for the Kansas women's team. His Uncle, Joe Adkins, played basketball at Oklahoma State. Xavier's brother, C. J., is a freshman on the University of Kansas basketball team. C.J. was a 2005 MLB draft first round pick who recently returned to college after playing three years of baseball in the New York Yankees and Philadelphia Phillies minor-league organizations.
Xavier Henry is the second best Shooting Guard prospect in the draft, behind Evan Turner. It is a tribute to the depth of this draft that he is slotted in the middle of the first round on most mock drafts, because in a different draft year, his size, strength, talent and scoring ability would almost certainly garner him top-10 consideration.
Xavier Henry has declared for the 2010 NBA Draft.
Xavier Henry's freshman year at Kansas was really a tale of three seasons. In his first 12 games, he was scoring at will, averaging 16.5 points and shooting over 50% from the field, including 48% from the 3-point line. Then he went into a terrible shooting slump where he couldn't seem to buy a basket. In the next 12 games he shot a dismal 33% (30% from 3) while averaging only 9.75 points per game. In the final stretch of 12 games, however, he rediscovered his shooting stroke, again averaging over 50% from the field and 48% from 3-point while scoring at a 14 ppg clip.
Xavier Henry is a smooth left-hander with terrific size and strength for his position. Standing 6'6" with a 6'10" wingspan and a well-built frame, Henry has an NBA-ready body. When I say he has an NBA-ready body, I mean he's a 6'6", 220 pound brick, and he will absolutely pulverize smaller guards in the post at the next level. After reading some articles, I was expecting to see a player that doesn't display a lot of explosiveness in his game, specifically, in jumping ability and lateral quickness. But after watching a ton of Kansas games this year, I've come to the conclusion that Xavier Henry is a terrific athlete - but that he just doesn't show it a lot. When needed, he can flat out get up and explode to the rim. Most of the rest of the time, he just looks like he's making the easy play.
Henry is a smart and unselfish player, and did a good job of creating for others within Kansas' offensive system. He can slash to the basket and pull up with with a nice floater, or continue on to the rim, where his strength and great body control usually gets him the "And-1." A great finisher, his strength allows him to absorb contact and power up to the basket. He needs to work on going to the right and using his right hand, otherwise his face-up game will become predictable. As I said, some scouting reports say he doesn't have "elite" quickness, but during the games I watched, he seemed to have no trouble at all getting by his opponent with his first step. It certainly looked like a quick first step to me, and I'm sure his opponents would agree as they were looking at his back going by them.
Very unselfish, Henry is a smart and willing passer, although his assist numbers don't show it (2.1 per 40 minutes). He keeps his head up and makes quick decisive passes. He's especially good in transition and in drive and dish situations, finding the open perimeter player. He can also drive to the basket and, when contested, dump the ball to his big man. The ball rarely "sticks" to him; as he either takes the shot, drives the basket or passes the ball.
Henry possesses NBA three-point range. His shot starts out a little low (from just above his head), but he releases the ball high and has a quick release. His form is consistent, and he gets his legs into his shot, getting very good elevation. Extremely accurate when spotting up and coming off screens, he needs to work on his jump shot off the dribble, as it is not nearly as effective. As I said, he has tremendous range, and he used that range to his advantage shooting more than 47% of his attempts from beyond the three-point line.
Even so, Henry drives quite a lot. He gets to the Free Throw line at a respectable rate (4.6 attempts per 40 minutes). Once there, he's almost automatic (78.5%). With him, there was very little middle ground. He was either putting up a 3-point shot, driving to the basket, or passing the ball. He rarely showed any mid-range game, or any ability to pull up off the dribble.
Henry has an effective, between-the-legs, right-to-left crossover dribble. He's also shown some spin moves in the paint on his drives to the basket. Still, generally, advanced ball handling is a weakness he will need to work on in the NBA.
On defense, Henry gives consistent effort and shows solid fundamentals. Again, some articles I read said he didn't have the lateral quickness to stay in front of quicker guards - but I rarely saw anyone blow past him at the college level. I thought his lateral quickness, while not eye-popping, was plenty good enough to stay in front of NBA shooting guards, especially the larger 2's in the Eastern Conference. His strength helps him with fighting through screens, so he's excellent playing the pick-and-roll. He's almost never posted up. His length helps him contest shots. He averaged over two steals a game (per 40) by playing the passing lanes, but unlike a lot of ball thieves, he didn't gamble too much. With his size, length and strength, Henry should be a very good on-ball perimeter defender in the NBA. He's also an excellent rebounder for a guard, averaging 6.3 per 40 minutes.
STRENGTHS:
- Left handed
- NBA body: Size, length, Strength
- Excellent spot up shooter
- Excellent free throw shooter
- Very Good passer
- NBA 3-point range
- Good Defensive tools: Fundamentals. Intensity. Effort. Strong. Long.
- Excellent rebounder
- Can post up smaller guards
- Intangibles: Great attitude. Hard worker. Very coachable. Tough.
- Needs to work on his ball handling
- Limited at creating shots
- Needs to work on his mid-range game
- Needs to work on jumper off the dribble
Previous Draft Profiles:
| John Wall | PG | 6-4 | 195 | Fr | Kentucky | Declared for the NBA Draft. |
| Evan Turner | SG | 6-7 |
217 | Jr. | Ohio St | Declared for the NBA Draft. |
| Wesley Johnson | SF | 6-7 | 205 | Jr. | Syracuse | Declared for the NBA Draft. |
| Derrick Favors | PF | 6-9 | 246 | Fr. | Ga. Tech | Undecided |
| DeMarcus Cousins | C | 6-11 | 280 | Fr. | Kentucky | Declared for the NBA Draft. |
| Al-Farouq Aminu | F | 6-8 | 218 | Soph. | Wake Forest | Declared for the NBA Draft; signed with an agent |
| Cole Aldrich | C | 6-11 | 245 | Jr. | Kansas | Declared for the NBA Draft, will hire agent |
| Greg Monroe | C | 6-10 | 247 | Soph. | Georgetown | Declared for the NBA Draft, will hire agent. |
| Patrick Patterson | F | 6-8 | 235 | Jr. | Kentucky | Undecided |
| Ed Davis | F | 6-10 | 225 | Soph. | North Carolina | Declared for the NBA Draft. |
| Hassan Whiteside -Upcoming |
C |
7-0 |
235 |
Fr. |
Marshall |
Declared for the NBA Draft; will hire agent |
| Xavier Henry |
SG |
6-6 |
220 |
Fr. |
Kansas |
Declared for the NBA Draft. |
| Damion James |
SF |
6-7 |
227 |
Sr. |
Texas |
Senior - Eligible for the Draft |
| Ekpe Udoh | PF/C |
6-10 |
240 |
Jr. |
Baylor |
Undecided |
| Stanley Robinson |
SF |
6-8 |
220 |
Sr. |
UConn |
Senior - Eligible for the Draft |
| James Anderson |
SG |
6-6 |
195 |
Jr. |
Oklahoma St. |
Declared for draft, has not hired agent |
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sounds like...
James Hardin. Solidly built shooting guard with a nice shot and suspect “athleticism”. I was surprised by Hardin’s success. Is Henry a better or worse prospect? Is it even a valid comparison?
You know it's funny
but until you said James Harden, I was trying to come up with a similar player….
Both are Left-handed. Both are “crafty” around the basket. Both are excellent spot up shooters… excellent passers…. good rebounders. Good range (3-point)…
Xavier Henry is a bit bigger… but Harden is the better defender.
If I had to choose, I’d say that Harden is a little better than Henry, right now. If he had come out last year, Henry would have been a top 10 pick – but since there are so many excellent players in this year’s draft, he’ll be picked somewhere in the middle of the first round.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
I would be quite happy with Henry and Udoh
if we could use our lotto pick to trade for a couple of later first round picks. Then we’d still have the Cavs pick and our second to clean up the best of what’s left.
When we end up at 8, I would very much like to trade down
Without question
Me too.
I like Henry and a lot of the lower lottery prospects. I’m just wondering which teams would be willing to trade up to the eighth spot.
"Guess you guys aren't ready for that yet... but trust me, you're gonna love it." ~Marty McFly
Maybe Indiana?
I don’t know what they have that we could want. Maybe Rush and the tenth pick for the seventh?
Follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
by pantslessyoda1 on Apr 22, 2010 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Can he swing over to small forward?
He seems to have just enough size (if he really is 6’6) to do it, which would make him a lot more valuable.
As a prospect, he seems pretty good, I’m not seeing any red flags here. I still think it’s more important that we get an upgrade at small forward or a legitimate center (I’m sort of dreading and dreaming of a Gil/Livingston backcourt), but a shooting guard could work, especially if we trade down to tenth or twelfth to get him.
Follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
by pantslessyoda1 on Apr 22, 2010 10:44 PM EDT reply actions
Well - I disagree. I think we need a SG
Mike Miller will probably bolt to a winning organization.
The Wiz aren’t going to tender an offer to Foye
In 4 years, Nick Young has not shown much improvement
As intriguing as a Livingston/Arenas back court sounds, Arenas doesn’t play as well off the ball, and Livingston is a pure PG. Plus, I’m still worried about Livingston’s and Arenas’ knees.
So where does our starting SG come from?
As for SF – Although I’m not convinced he’s the answer, the Wizards have Al Thornton… Also, Quinton Ross is an option when defense is needed. PLUS, every indication is that the Wiz will make an offer to Josh Howard. Howard has proved to be a starting quality SF in the League. Thornton, Howard and Ross gives the Wizards depth at SF. Besides, in a pinch, Nick Young can play SF.
NO – I think the priorities in the Draft have to be Center and Shooting Guard.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
Same argument for SF, but no Arenas possibility
I actually think Young is just as good at SG as Thorton is at SF, and Young should still improve. Howard could play either position, but probably won’t be ready to start working the rust off in games until December. It could pan out, but I really don’t think Howard is going to be the answer for a future-focused team at either position — age, a downward career trend and the injury make him a longshot to be strong 2-3 years from now when the Wizards are ready to start making noise in the playoffs.
Thorton seems unlikely to further improve, at his age, and is a mediocre starter at best. At SG we have a still-developing Young and possibly Arenas. I’d rather use one of the later picks to shore up that position. Ross isn’t an NBA quality player and will be gone after next year, so he shouldn’t factor into draft plans. That leaves you with Thorton (who probably should be a bench guy) as your only real SF. If the Wizards plan to sign Livingston, then SF (or center if you’re ready to give up on McGee, which I"m not) where lottery talent is most needed.
Any thoughts on Wall as a SG?
If he wanted to, I think he could be another DWade.
Maybe Gilbert and Wall could be great together. A pair of elite tweener combo guards could play off of each other really well on the offensive end and also match up well with traditional PG-SG lineups at the defensive end. Or not.
I'd rather play Gil at shooting guard
They would probably be atrocious (Ellis and Curry) bad on defense, but it could conceivably work.
Follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
by pantslessyoda1 on Apr 24, 2010 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Are we sure we'll have Howard again next year?
I’d think that he would try to get on a contender or at least a decent team. He’s also kind of old for us. Either way, I don’t think we should take a guy who won’t be starting in three years into account when we draft this year.
If there were a James Harden in the draft, I’d take him over Johnson, but Henry is looking like the best guy we’d actually be able to draft. I think Ross can check shooting guards a lot better than he can small forwards considering his build, although I’d really rather not give him anything more than spot minutes – he’s a good defender, but he’s such an atrocious offensive player that it overrides any positives he brings on the other end.
The way I see it, while Thornton is a better player than Young, he has less upside at this point. Young was pretty bad last year and I don’t think he’ll break out or anything, but at worst he’ll give us reasonable defense and some scoring while spacing the floor, and it’s conceivable he could become a better rebounder (he averaged 4 per 40 as a rookie) and I could see him getting his PER to around 15 if he gets a consistent 30 minutes a night. Thornton’s a bad defender (he has the tools and puts in the effort, but his iq is Javale-like) and has never been anything more than a below-average player who doesn’t space the floor – I basically see him a place-holder until we can get someone with some kind of promise or with a real roleplayers skillset (a Posey type in my mind).
Follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/TheRealTPruitt
by pantslessyoda1 on Apr 24, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
IMPROVEMENT
NEITHER had blache in five years until he was given a chance. you have to play to improve,plus you have to be what others team don’t want to play in washington. NICK WILL BE ONE OF THE BEST SG IN THE LEAGUE I SAID IT AND I’M NOT TAKING IT BACK, LIKE THE GUY FROM NBA LIVE SAID. WATCH AND SEE.
straight talk
by Mae.jude@yahoo.com on Apr 23, 2010 11:11 AM EDT reply actions
Agree
For Nick right now, it’s all about playing time and getting repetitions against different opponents.
I’m really happy with Nick’s development the last couple of years. He was really, really raw when he came into the league, but it has been a lot of fun to watch his progress. I think he’ll be a solid, reliable SG by the middle of next year. As his awareness improves and becomes more and more automatic, he has a chance to blossom into the player we all hoped he would be.
As a rookie, it seemed like the game was completely inscrutable to him. He had no idea what was going on. His second season, the game started to make sense, but it all happened way too fast. This year, the game started to slow down for him. With his tools, I’m expecting great things going forward, as long as he can keep from hanging his head after his first shot (or four) fails to fall.
JaVale, on the other hand, really worries me. He started out just as clueless as Nick, and there’s been absolutely no progress. He should have spent the last two years in the D-League.
McGee has improved and will improve more
I’m not certain of course, but pretty confident. I was beginning to wonder at mid-season, but his play did improve at the end of the year. Enough so that I’d say he actually had a slightly better campaign in his second year overall. Over the last several games I saw fewer cases of him completely losing track of his assignment, and his blocks-to-fouls ratio skyrocketed this year. He’s still only 22, and will probably continue to improve for 3 more years. I would love to see the Wizards leave him out there to sink or swim next season. It might not be pretty, but I think he’d swim, and by the end of the year we’d be excited about his future.
Keep in mind, that even clueless Javale has a PER of 17, gives you 15/9/3blks per 36, makes up for some of his defensive boneheadedness by making opponents leery of shooting inside, and that he’s still only 3 seasons removed from playing 10mpg at Nevada.
Exaggerated
McGee has improved, and it’s hard to blame him for still being raw, since he hasn’t been playing C for very long. Didn’t he show up at college as a SF and only switch to C after a late growth spurt? Still, I think some time in the D-League would have been good for him.
Listen
The one thing Wizards need desperately is a post scorer or defensive presence inside. Whoever is the better player that provides either of those, get him please. Simple enough, right?

by 























