Wizards blow 13-point lead in loss to Celtics: Final wrap, where I blame the Minnesota guys
It seems Flip Saunders is hot about how Andray Blatche supposedly talked trash to Kevin Garnett and woke him up, thereby waking up the Celtics and allowing them to push through for the win. Which is fine, I guess. Blatche clearly let KG get under his skin, and since Blatche is the future of the team, he should be judged more harshly than anyone else. It's always said that it's a problem when your coach isn't coaching you, not when he's constantly on you.
However, Andray Blatche didn't lose us last night's game. He's had better shooting nights, but on the whole, he played very well. In fact, our frontcourt in general completely outplayed the Celtics. JaVale McGee had zero rebounds, sure, but he also blocked five shots, altered several more and forced Kevin Garnett into two or three traveling violations. Al Thornton wasn't shooting good shots, but he was making them and doing a great job on the glass. Blatche locked down Garnett, hit 50 percent of his shots and had nine defensive rebounds. If those three are our future, they showed tremendous progress tonight.
It's our backcourt that killed us. Specifically, Randy Foye and Mike Miller, the two guys who were supposed to be complimentary pieces worthy of trading our first top-five draft pick in years.
Foye shot 3-14, but that obscured just how bad he was last night. Down the stretch, when the Wizards needed to get organized and run clean sets, Foye couldn't do it and we couldn't run our offense. The problem with Foye is the same problem he's had throughout his NBA career: he likes to survey and dribble time off the shot clock like he's Kobe Bryant or Dwyane Wade. That's how he played at Villanova, and that's how he played in Minnesota when there was literally nobody else to score. Minnesota's default play was to give Foye the ball and let him survey. It's how he got the nickname "Fourth Quarter Foye." It's how smart writers like Kelly Dwyer can say he's "great down the stretch," even though his teams have always failed. Under Flip Saunders, though, your point guard can't survey. He has to make quick, decisive moves to set others up, even down the stretch in the fourth quarter.
As much as Foye is trying to break the surveying habit, he can't. There was one play late in the game where the Wizards had six seconds on the shot clock. Foye took the ball out of bounds, aimlessly dribbled for three seconds while standing 35 feet from the hoop, and eventually got nowhere. He was eventually forced to fling the ball up from 22 feet away because he lost his balance and couldn't jump. Worse, because he's always looking for his shot, nobody else is ready for when he passes. It's no accident that our entry passes down the stretch were abysmal last night. It's in part Foye's fault that Thornton and Blatche caught the ball so far away from the hoop when they did.
As for Miller, I could (and might) put together some screenshots and clips of all the things he did wrong tonight. There were many, on both ends of the court. But the truth is, Miller was pulling the same stuff he's been pulling ever since the trades. Passing out to confused teammates when he receives even the slightest of pressure. Not shooting open threes. Throwing up loopy floaters (if he's not passing) instead of taking it strong to the basket. Coming off a pick and roll and just stopping instead of trying to make a play (if there's anyone with Synergy, I'd love to see how Mike rates on pick and rolls). The only difference tonight is that he also played pitiful defense on Ray Allen. Allen had 25 points on 15 shots, and most of those came with Miller guarding him. The worst effort was on the last play of the game, when Miller was literally out of the picture as Allen drained the go-ahead wide-open three, but there were other plays too. I would have liked to see Flip go to Quinton Ross more, because at least Ross plays solid D. Miller doesn't make any plays offensively anyway, so it's not like Ross hurts you much on that end.
Ladies and gentlemen, these are the guys we traded the fifth pick for last summer. Those guys cost us the game. Not Andray Blatche flipping out at Kevin Garnett.
To close with some good news, I'll throw this out there. The players who played poorly last night are guys stuck in our past. The players who played well last night are guys that compose our future, at least among those left on the roster. Since the future of this team is way more important than the present or past, that's a very encouraging sign, even if we lost the game.
Four Factors (Bold=very good | Italics=very bad)
| Team | Pace | Off Eff | eFG% | FT/FG | OREB% | TOr |
| Washington | 92 | 90.2 | 46.3 | 35.3 | 17.1 | 20.7 |
| Boston |
93.5 | 44.5 | 35.6 | 21.1 | 17.2 |
Snap Reaction: Just an unbelievably ugly game on all counts.
Lineup Details, via Popcorn Machine
- Highest individual plus/minus: Randy Foye (+7 in 35:24)
- Lowest individual plus/minus: Earl Boykins (-10 in 12:24)
- Best five-man unit: Randy Foye/Mike Miller/Al Thornton/James Singleton/Andray Blatche (+8 in the first quarter)
- Worst five-man unit: Randy Foye/Mike Miller/Al Thornton/Andray Blatche/JaVale McGee (-13 to end the game)
Snap Reaction: Foye ended up with the highest plus/minus on the team, which confuses me. I guess that tells you a lot about how bad Earl Boykins is.
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
I agree
with every bit of Prada’s analysis. IF there is a “bright side,” it may be that Foye and Miller are playing themselves out of any kind of substantial contract offers, because, as they are showing that they are not good starters, then they will not command starter’s money. As bad as they were for us last night, I think most would agree they’d be pretty good coming off the bench at around 15 mins per game. So they may just agree to stay, which would be fine by me…but at less than 5 mi per, for Miller, and much less than that for Foye.
Right on the money
The single biggest weakness on this team is our lack of a point guard. I think this season has shown that Foye is a combo guard who is best suited to sitting on the bench and providing injury insurance. He simply cannot create of the dribble, the one thing a point guard absolutely needs to be able to do. I don’t need him to be Gilbert Arenas, but damn, I can’t remember a single instance this season where I have seen him take a defender off the dribble. His best move is coming off the high screen and shooting a long two pointer. Earl is obviously just too small to really create anything. He as the speed and can shoot, but he is no real threat in the lane. I think with an average point guard we could have won, or at least been competitive, in a few more games. As it is we are always forced to improvise on offense.
Can someone PLEASE
re-arrange the seating chart for the Wizards bench? I’d like to put Boykins on the OTHER side of whatever new 10day contract guy we have, so that Earl is completely out of sight. Then perhaps he will be out of Flip’s mind. The insanity of keeping him in the game is maddening to me, yet Flip continues to lavish praise upon the worlds smallest ball hog.
Outside of that, I am once again satisfied with the outcome of this game. I have been saying for sometime that I don’t believe Foye is a starter in this league. Undersized (and underathletic) at the 2, and unable to run the point. So while I completely agree with everything Mike says here, it does not bother me because it is what I’ve come to expect. I have also been saying that I don’t think Miller fits in with this team. With all this, I am somewhat amazed that we were in the position, right up until the end, to win this game. I think it is a testament to the growth of McGee, Blatche, and Thornton. Those 3 basically kept us in this game. You could throw Singleton in there as well. McGee’s “around the rim” effect, as well as Singleton’s spot defense, were the biggest reasons this was we held the Celtics well below their scoring average, which is exactly what kept us in the game.
Personally, I’d like to see Livingston run the point, with Foye next to him in the backcourt. Perhaps his point guard instincts can make up for his athletic limitations.
yes give livingston a chance
he is the only real point guard we have and his size and smarts, as you say, may cover for his gimpy knee
And I am still not convinced about McGee, Garnett is old
Using his athletecism to get some blocks and some put backs is fine, but that isn’t going to take him very far because he simply cannot do anything else. He can’t shoot, he can’t dribble, and he makes extremely poor choices. Basically, he is Kwame Brown without the high expectations. I cringe every time he finds himself alone with the ball on the low blocks. He will either dribble off his leg or put up one of his god awful looking jumpers.
The one thing he did do last night was expose Boston’s age. I’ve watched them play a dozen or more times this year and they look outhustled on almost every night. The young fellas in the east are going to catch up with them this year, even with the big three on the court.
I agree, I'm not completely sold on him yet either....
He has gotta make some tremendous strides in the next couple of years. He’s the most athletic guy on the court, but that can only get you so far. To his credit, I think he has been playing much smarter on the defensive end since he’s been getting consistent minutes. But he has gotta gain some offensive post moves and not just wait for a lob or an easy slam. He needs a go to move if he’s gonna be a guy we build around. I think him gaining some bulk will help his offensive game tremendously. He gets push off of the block too often, and when he attempts to make a move, he’s always outmuscled which is why he fades a lot. However, I think his biggest improvement will be when he becomes smarter, he makes a lot of boneheaded plays, but I guess thats why you “play them young”
by SkinsWizStangs on Mar 8, 2010 6:25 PM EST up reply actions
Well he has made a lot progress over the last 3 weeks...
His performance against Boston impressed me. He ran the pick and roll, crashed the boards (sometimes getting pushed out of the way admittedly), showed a better understanding of floor spacing, and really just wasn’t afraid to get tangled up with Boston’s front line.
I’m not the least bit worried about his offensive repertoire, since he’s playing next to Blatche. He should be fine at least for the next year with garbage points and catching the D sleeping with the occasional post up or drive from the foul line (saw him do that a couple times – once was a foul and the other was a bucket). I’m more concerned with his rebounding. He needs to get stronger, so he can establish and hold his position on the glass.
As a big ball of potential and motivation, I’m all but sold. I think he’s gonna be one heck of a player.
Agreed, Prada
I don’t have a problem with Blatche at least defending himself a bit, especially if, like he said, all he was saying to Garnett is to get out of his face. If he hadn’t done anything at all, the same people complaining would have said he was soft or something like that. Blatche has been outstanding lately, and one three-point loss to the Celtics isn’t that big of a deal.
by Matt K. on Mar 8, 2010 12:47 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
we should have won that game
that counts for something, right?
as for miller versus ross: miller forces people to pay attention to him and guard him on offense – you really cannot leave hime open – so i’d play him over ross. it gives blatche more room to operate.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Mar 8, 2010 1:01 PM EST reply actions
Foye is a 2 guard
Square peg round hole. I don’t blame Foye cause he’s a natural scorer, just like Gilby.
We haven’t had a decent point guard survey the court since Antonio Daniels.
During crunch time, Gilbert never surveyed the court, he just bull rushed his way to the foul line begging to get a call, which he usually didn’t get this year. That doesn’t work.
That is the problem with combo guards. They can’t balance scoring and distribution in a fluid fashion. That’s life.
Trade for Collison.
Yet
Foye and Miller are here to compliment the big three on the drive to the Eastern Conference Finals and beyond….so trading the 5th pick overall or whatever it was…was a great move , right?….uuurrrghh! lol :)
uh oh, wait…the scenario where Foye and Miller actually become two of the big three…wasent , uh , er, considered ….lol …..another chapter ….Lets Go Wizards !
by Mikko Leinonen's opposite on Mar 9, 2010 3:16 AM EST reply actions

by 


















