Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Terry Collins, David Wright, And The Mets/Brewers Kerfuffle

John Wall is the face of the Wizards no matter what

It's the day of the Wizards first game this season, so it's as good a time as ever for some people to revisit the question of whether this can really be "John Wall's team" with the horrible, awful Black Plague known as Gilbert Arenas still on the roster.  (Don't take the last part of that last sentence literally).  Because anytime you can beat a dead horse into the ground, revive it, have it die again and then commence beating, you do it.

Today in the Washington Examiner, Rick Snider says this is never going to be Wall's "team" as long as Agent Wackypants is around. 

The Wizards can pretend Wall is their centerpiece and hang all the banners they want from Chinatown to Chantilly, but Arenas is that person who's the center of any party.

This will be Arenas' team until he finally does something that forces owner Ted Leonsis to eat the contract and send the guard away. Whether that's this season or next, the day is coming.

And in today's Washington Post, Michael Lee explores the issue some more.  Somehow, it's a burning question whose "team" it is.

Look, the answer is simple: it's John Wall's team.  He is the point guard.  He is the number one draft pick.  He is the cornerstone of a very transparent rebuilding effort.  He is already a leader.  He is the guy who is responsible for getting everyone else the ball.  He is amazing enough as a person to accept all of that and handle it well no matter what.  I'm amazed that this is even a question.

Will Arenas hog a lot of media attention?  Of course, whether he wants to or not.  Will he be the leading scorer if he plays?  Yeah, probably.  Will he accept a "sidekick" role for the long haul?  Maybe, maybe not.  But regardless, it doesn't matter.  The Wizards  will go as John Wall goes, not as Gilbert Arenas goes.  That's what happens when you're the number one pick on a young team.

Bottom line: one does not determine the leader of a team by salary, experience, media attention or anything like that.  It's determined by attitude, usage, confidence, trust and leadership.  Last I checked, Wall's defining characteristic was his leadership ability.  Last I checked, he was playing the most minutes and having the ball in his hands all the time in the preseason.  Last I checked, his head coach couldn't stop gushing over him.  That makes this his team, with Arenas occupying some role between an entertaining sideshow and a non-entity.  

Arenas may distract the media, but he's not the guy in charge anymore.  This team will have many problems, but sorting out who it belongs to is not one of them.

Comment 58 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I really wish we could end this talk about who's team it is

This is the only downside about getting the number 1 pick (please don’t get me wrong I will take the number 1 pick 10 out of 10 sundays), it created all this talk about who’s team this is. Who cares? It’s something that’s brought up to cause division and maybe create another Gil is a bad guy story. If John Wall continues to display the leadership qualities he’s already shown then great he’s one of the leaders on the team or the leader of the team.

The Wizards did a disservice to John by declaring it was his team early on. Let them be the Wizards and if Nick Young or McGee or Blatche start displaying those same leadership qualities is Michael Lee going to declare it’s there team and not John Wall’s team? Basically it’s a stupid topic and Michael Lee should write something better. As far as the Examiners goes they wrote a made-up story about Gil on Tuesday so I don’t expect much from them.

by Kryp on Oct 28, 2010 1:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed....I get sick of it too!

Just another senseless article to try and frustrate and discredit Arenas before he ever steps on the court. It is almost as if some reporters are trying thier damndest to make this thing fail. Wall and Arenas obviously have respect for one another, Arenas knows that Wall is the future..why would he step on the kid’s toes??

Couldn’t help but notice how quiet Arenas has been so far this season and rarely will give an interview, seems like the media is trying to punish him for that decision.

by TheRealBigMike on Oct 28, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Flip gushes too much.

What if Blatche is the best player on the team this year? What if Mcgee has the breakout year we’re all hoping? Will Flip still point the finger their way everytime something goes wrong as he did in preseason?

I’m all for the Wall era!! But this kid is 20yrs old, please dont have him on such a pedestal that he wont be critiqued publicly for bad play the way everyone else is. Remember all the stuff Doc has said about Rondo? Look how that’s working out…

by DCrez on Oct 28, 2010 2:13 PM EDT reply actions  

The answer to the question

I agree that Arenas and his contract are the elephant in the room. That doesn’t make him THE MAN on this team. Why?

1. He hasn’t even really practiced with THIS team.
2. THIS team has never experienced Gilbert as a leading STAR. Who on this roster has experienced that Gilbert? Blatche. Anyone else?
3. Who has the ball? John Wall. His future is the Wizards future. The end.

by Jheiser3 on Oct 28, 2010 2:14 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Mike touches on this

For the media, Gil is the face of the Wizards because he is the guy they want to interview. (That could change if Wall starts having huge games.)

But in all other respects, Wall is the face of the Wizards. They are building around him. If he isn’t already the team’s leader, he will be in time.

by disgrunted on Oct 28, 2010 2:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Nonsense

This is just another example of trying to make Gilbert Arenas the focal point and the story. This is John Wall’s team, end of story. Gilbert has stated it. The owner has stated it. So why are we having this debate?

by ThePGPhenomenon on Oct 28, 2010 2:22 PM EDT reply actions  

because

some dude needed a story and he went back to the same well.

by Jheiser3 on Oct 28, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes - no question

i’m over this and believe it’s a media-driven issue now.
100% off topic – anyone else notice that BOTH jamison and haywood are not starters anymore?

"hindsight is 50-50" - Steve Spurrier

by little stevie colter on Oct 28, 2010 2:25 PM EDT reply actions  

wait for it.............wait for it...........

I’m just waiting to hear about an altercation during a Dallas practice between Haywood and Chandler.

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on Oct 28, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nobody

seems to acknowledge that Jamison has a bit of an ego. He always had a sense of entitlement. I think Flip was talking about him and Butler at the beginning of training camp. You only hear the good things, but nobody is perfect.

by ThePGPhenomenon on Oct 28, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

well

I believe his sense of entitlement comes from his history of double doubles. Its not like he’s done absolutely nothing of worth in the league, like everyone on our roster outside of Hinrich.

by Jheiser3 on Oct 28, 2010 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some of us have been taling about his ego

and preciousness for awhile

I am just a bitter Wizards fan who clings to my bobbleheads and that 2005 playoff series victory!

by George Templeton on Oct 28, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jamison should start -- he is great at leading a team to the lottery

Yeah, that was a cheap shot. Sorry.

How exactly has he been bitching? I haven’t seen any stories, so I would like the juicy details!

by disgrunted on Oct 28, 2010 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's a link

Link.

“It is what it is,” he said. “I don’t know what the role is going to (entail). I don’t know how many minutes I’ll play. I’m up in the air, just like you.”

by Mike Prada on Oct 28, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is bitching?

by MR on Oct 28, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

’’We’ve all got egos,‘’ Jamison said. ’’But right now, if [Scott] feels that’s the best way for us to win, I have to go with that. It’ll be tough, but I just have to find a way to get a rhythm off the bench and do what I have to do to help these guys win. We’ll see. J.J. has been playing well and you have to understand that.’’

link

by MR on Oct 28, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't see that as whining...

Whining would be “It’s not fair, I’ve earned it, I’m a vet, a double-double guy my whole career, etc.”

by YellaFella on Oct 28, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think either of those quotes is bitching, whining, or grumbling

Short of “Great idea coach” I am not sure what else he could say.

“Do what I have to do to help these guys win”

“JJ has been playing well and you have to understand that”

Come on, you guys are looking for excuses.

Haters? Maybe not. But you are all acting like Dislikers.

Dislikers!

by MR on Oct 28, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Come on now

Here’s the right thing to say.

“Obviously, it’s the coaches decision. J.J. has been playing really well for us, and I think he should be rewarded for that with the starting job. It’s definitely going to be an adjustment for me, but I’m going to do everything possible to the best I can to help this team win in whatever way my coach asks.”

by Mike Prada on Oct 28, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Um

that is paraphrasing EXACTLY what he said!

by MR on Oct 28, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Obviously, it’s the coaches decision

vs

if [Scott] feels that’s the best way for us to win, I have to go with that.

J.J. has been playing really well for us, and I think he should be rewarded for that with the starting job

vs

J.J. has been playing well and you have to understand that

It’s definitely going to be an adjustment for me

vs

t’ll be tough, but I just have to find a way to get a rhythm off the bench

but I’m going to do everything possible to the best I can to help this team win in whatever way my coach asks

vs

do what I have to do to help these guys win

There is really very little difference in these quotes

by MR on Oct 28, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let me try that again
“Obviously, it’s the coaches decision

vs

if [Scott] feels that’s the best way for us to win, I have to go with that.
J.J. has been playing really well for us, and I think he should be rewarded for that with the starting job

vs

J.J. has been playing well and you have to understand that

It’s definitely going to be an adjustment for me

vs

t’ll be tough, but I just have to find a way to get a rhythm off the bench

but I’m going to do everything possible to the best I can to help this team win in whatever way my coach asks

vs

do what I have to do to help these guys win

There is really very little difference in these quotes

by MR on Oct 28, 2010 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which was first though?

Without looking at the timing of the quote you posted, I would guess it came after his first quote, so he kind of realized he needed to engage in some damage control.

If I’m wrong, I take it back.

by Mike Prada on Oct 28, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know

but that is making a lot of assumptions, especially given that the quote you posted is pretty benign. If you read it with a nasty crabby tone then it sounds like an a-hole complaining. If you read it with a thoughtful questioning tone then it sounds like a guy trying to figure out his new role.

Honestly I see nothing here. I think your bias is showing.

by MR on Oct 28, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Still doesn't sound whiny or grumpy.

I’m not saying Jamison can’t be that way — all of us Wizards-watchers know he can — but I don’t think those quotes prove it. In his shoes, I might be a little perturbed, too, I have to admit.

by YellaFella on Oct 28, 2010 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not denying that, to be honest

Just saying that all this talk about him being the ideal teammate willing to sacrifice goes up in smoke sometimes when he’s asked to sacrifice himself.

He’ll be a pro regardless, but let’s not pretend he’s a perfect leader.

by Mike Prada on Oct 28, 2010 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're right.

He’s far from the perfect pro. But those comments were awful vanilla; I think you read too much into them. Your general point is correct, that Jamison isn’t the guy many portray him to be, i.e. the “consummate pro.”

by YellaFella on Oct 28, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

And if Arenas said it

after being benched – the entire blog-o-sphere would blow up…. ESPN.com columnists would have more fodder for their “bash Arenas” campaign….

But since it’s being said by “good guy” Jamison – it’s taken with a grain of salt – or rather, spun in a positive light.

We all followed Antawn last year – and he was far from the “professional”, gracious, veteran leader he’s made out to be – complaining about younger players making mistakes , complaining about not getting enough “touches”, and in general showing how NOT to be a leader…

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on Oct 28, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with that, Rook...

My point was that those specific comments don’t scream “bitchy” or “whiny”. That’s all.

by YellaFella on Oct 28, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

All I'm saying is

read them, keeping in mind his past actions and comments in Washington- and you get a different take on it…

In and by themselves, they can be portrayed innocently…. with past context, it’s bitching and whining…

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on Oct 28, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sigh.

The context is the interview itself, not Jamison’s past. Mike was using Jamison’s past to broaden the meaning of the quotes. But the quotes, in the proper context, don’t carry the meaning Mike claimed. IMO, of course.

by YellaFella on Oct 28, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

So in other words

if you do exactly what you hate columnists for doing then you can see Jamison in a negative light.

by MR on Oct 28, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wouldn't mind seeing Jamison come back

but only in a mentor/reserve roll. Especially since he spent his prime years here, only fitting to let him finish out his career here and keep him a part of the organization.

by TheRealBigMike on Oct 28, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

eh -

"hindsight is 50-50" - Steve Spurrier

by little stevie colter on Oct 28, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

sorry - overeager with the enter key

eh – i feel for him a little and his crappy situation, but outside of that i’m really glad not to have him on the team.

"hindsight is 50-50" - Steve Spurrier

by little stevie colter on Oct 28, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

AND -

no reason he wouldn’t bitch about not starting here vs. in cleveland.

"hindsight is 50-50" - Steve Spurrier

by little stevie colter on Oct 28, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would mind

No Jamison please. Thank you

by qthaballa on Oct 28, 2010 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

It is not John Wall team. Dude can not talk sound like a hog, and off the wall have not earn jack. Gilbert is and all way’s will the face off DC.

straight talk

by Mae.jude@yahoo.com on Oct 28, 2010 2:50 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Mae, you completely disappoint me

Not 1 mention of Slick Nick in your post?! WTF?

by qthaballa on Oct 28, 2010 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

BTW Bill Rohland

is a Arenas hater. I’m listening to him on the Fan and he has had nothing but negative things to say about him. Some of it is true, but a lot of it just sounds like nonsense. There’s too many people that are out to bash Gil, without understanding the totality of what he can do for the Wizards.

by ThePGPhenomenon on Oct 28, 2010 4:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Can you please change the post to

“…THe soon the be Bullets…” Please?

Tonight we see the Wizards vs the Magic. That is way too Harry Potter for me.

by brettpedigo on Oct 28, 2010 6:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Ghanaouturuguaytrough_small M. Katz

Small Jeff Newman

Small jkahn15

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

402135_2504659589329_1638181922_1758918_1004201176_n_small Bullet Nation in Exile