Gilbert Arenas and Javaris Crittenton suspended for rest of NBA season (UPDATED)
According to Michael Lee, the NBA will announce later today that Gilbert Arenas has been suspended for the rest of the NBA season.
Lee reports that Arenas was actually the one to suggest his punishment, and Stern agreed with Arenas' judgement. The NBA Players Association doesn't plan on fighting the decision.
At the end of the day, this is pretty much what was expected. I don't really have a problem with it and I'm personally happy that Arenas wasn't suspended for any longer. It speaks volumes that Arenas went ahead and suggested this punishment. Perhaps Stern told Arenas to do this as a way to see how remorseful he was. Perhaps Arenas legitimately worried he'd be suspended for longer. Either way, it gives you an idea how seriously everyone now takes this.
We'll have much more as it happens here.
UPDATE: More from Lee:
The same source said that during the meeting, Arenas asked Stern about the possibility of having the remaining four years of his six-year $111 million contract voided, to which Stern replied, "That would be left up to the team." He also informed Arenas that members of the Wizards organization had yet made an inquiry about voiding his contract to the NBA's legal department.
UPDATE: Via Adrian Wojnarowski:
Stern had been considering two suspension scenarios for the former All-Star: the remainder of this season or a full 82-game ban that would extend into next season. League sources said Stern gave Arenas the chance to take the shorter suspension if he pledged not to appeal it.
Wojnarowski reports that Javaris Crittenton is expected to receive "a similar punishment."
UPDATE: Via Wojnarowski's Twitter:
Union negotiated rest of season vs full 82 game ban with Stern over past week, well before Arenas walked into NBA office today, sources say.
Arenas understood that if he didn't agree to rest of season suspension, Stern could've well gone for 82 game banishment into next year.
UPDATE: Ken Berger on the void possibility.
Arenas, whose relationship with most members of the Wizards' hierarchy is fractured, has been concerned that the team would seek to void the remaining four years and $81 million on his contract. The team has, to this point, shown no inclination to take such a drastic step, which would face a formidable legal challenge. In his initial suspension letter to Arenas when he suspended him indefinitely on Jan. 7, Stern said his punishment was irrespective of any discipline the team chose to impose. But the collective bargaining agreement contains strong language protecting players from being sanctioned by the league and their team for the same offense.
UPDATE: Poll added.
UPDATE: According to Howard Beck, Javaris Crittenton has also been suspended for the season. Full statement coming.
UPDATE: Stern's statement, via Beck.
The issue here is not about the legal ownership and possession of guns, either in one's home or elsewhere. It is about possession of guns in the NBA workplace, which will not be tolerated. Both have expressed remorse for their actions and an understanding of the seriousness of their transgressions. Both have volunteered to engage in community service to turn the lessons they have learned into an educational message for others. I accept fully the sincerity of their expressions of regret and intent to create something positive from this incident.
Also, to track this story from start to finish, check out SBNation.com's massive story stream.
UPDATE: Here's the Wizards' statement, via my inbox:
The NBA announced today that they have suspended Gilbert Arenas and Javaris Crittenton for the remainder of the season. We understand and fully support their decision.
Both players violated D.C. laws and NBA rules by bringing guns into the locker room. Their poor judgment has also violated the trust of our fans and stands in contrast to everything Abe Pollin stood for throughout his life. It is widely known that Mr. Pollin took the extraordinary step of changing the team name from "Bullets" to "Wizards" in 1997 precisely to express his abhorrence of gun violence in our community. We hope that this negative situation can produce something positive by serving as a reminder that gun violence is a serious issue.
We look forward to putting this unfortunate incident behind us and once again focusing our full attention on playing exciting basketball in front of our great fans at Verizon Center.
Ernie Grunfeld, President, Washington Wizards
Irene Pollin, Principal Owner, Washington Sports and Entertainment (WSE)
Robert Pollin, Chief Executive Officer, WSE
James Pollin, President, WSE
Ernie's going to speak to the media today at 6 before the Caps game. I can't attend, but it'll be streaming live on WashingtonWizards.com.
UPDATE: Stern's full statement is here.
UPDATE: Stern's speaking on the matter here.
0 recs |
48 comments
|
Comments
yep - and now wizards cant say gill couldnt play because he was in jail
by arijordan on Jan 27, 2010 2:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
hopefully now he shows some public remorse before sentencing
by arijordan on Jan 27, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, hopefully he can muster up some fabricated remorse well after the fact…..
"I’m tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok." ~Shaq
by Max_in_Missouri on Jan 27, 2010 4:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Gil...
For once again putting yourself ahead of the team, and hurting the Wizards by missing another season. Can’t wait to hear now how the Wizards are to blame by not supporting you more, and have betrayed you.
by YellaFella on Jan 27, 2010 3:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
now what about crittendon
his has to be the same
by arijordan on Jan 27, 2010 3:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Fill me in on the void
It has been a while since there has been talk here and in the DC media about the Wizards voiding Arenas’s contract. Prada, is that option off the table at this point?
If Arenas is jailed for part of the season, then he is unable to play for two reasons. The NBA suspending Arenas for the remainder of the season does not take away the Wizards argument that because he can’t play due to jail time his contract should be voidable.
by morethesamewiz on Jan 27, 2010 3:06 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
I have no idea
But it’s possible it makes voiding harder because one reason Sprewell’s voiding got overturned was because the arbitrator thought it was double jeopardy that he had to serve both a league suspension and a team suspension.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jan 27, 2010 3:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
from what i have read
a couple of lawyers – basically the reason gil wouldnt be able to perform on his contract would be the NBA suspension. this would supercede the argument that he isnt performing because he is in jail.
by arijordan on Jan 27, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i know that sounds weird
but it does make sense…i suspect this is why gil, among other reasons, asked for the rest of year…hoping his jail time doesnt overlap into next season
by arijordan on Jan 27, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Those lawyers are speculating (and badly)
In a contract dispute, one party’s malfeasance will never protect them.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jan 27, 2010 5:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Voiding has nothing to do with him going to jail
The argument a team would use in voiding his contract is moral turpitude (as evidenced by a felony conviction), not inability to perform his duties.
by RamV on Jan 27, 2010 6:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
However
there is a clause in the standard Player contract that says the Team can void the contract if the Player does not perform…..
It would seem to me to be easier to prove that Arenas did not perform if he were in Jail – than it will be to prove “moral turpitude” (whatever that is)……
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jan 28, 2010 9:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not exactly:
It says “The Team may terminate this Contract upon written notice to the Player if the Player shall… at any time, fail, refuse, or neglect to render his services hereunder or in any other manner materially breach this Contract.”
This clause is generally there because of the “refuse” (i.e. won’t get off the bench) or “neglect” (i.e. no-show) clauses. They would have to argue “fail”, which is very vague, and it would be a tough argument to make. One could argue (speciously) that he failed to render his services as a result of Stern’s suspension.
by RamV on Jan 28, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Now at least potential trading partners (if any)...
at least know when Gilbert will return and can plan accordingly.
Conversely the Wizards, if new management so chooses, can start breaking up the team with either of two scenarios in mind…. Gil gone in 2010-11 or Gil redux (yep, it could happen folks).
by khrabb on Jan 27, 2010 3:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Shocking
Would really like to know what, of the many possibilities, caused Arenas to ask to miss the rest of the season.
Anything from embarassment to legal wrangling to keep his contract to hoping that Grunfeld et al are gone by the time he comes back….
by JonathanJoseph on Jan 27, 2010 3:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
As I mentioned above
This might make it harder for the Wizards to void. Maybe that’s why.
The other possibility is that Gilbert is just weird and does things differently.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jan 27, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
when does training camp start?
march 27th sentencing – assuming he gets 6 months and serves min time (4 months), he is ready to go by august
by arijordan on Jan 27, 2010 3:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if he really did this
this would be the 1st good move he has made in this whole fiasco
by arijordan on Jan 27, 2010 3:15 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Yup.
And rec’cd
Its hard to stay mad at the guy… he reminds me of my nephew.
And I agree Mike that its Gil being Gil.
by jones-y on Jan 27, 2010 3:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, it appears it's neither
Stern had been considering two suspension scenarios for the former All-Star: the remainder of this season or a full 82-game ban that would extend into next season. League sources said Stern gave Arenas the chance to take the shorter suspension if he pledged not to appeal it.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jan 27, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sad Gil in a suit has been posted far too much. Hopefully Gil will be happy next season wherever he is.
by Fundefined on Jan 27, 2010 3:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Another possibility..
Ted might be more than willing to work on a buyout, especially is he keeps EG. Personally, I’ve got no problem with tossing them both over the side, but I’m pretty sure one will make it through.
by imperialme on Jan 27, 2010 3:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'd be really upset if Gil goes and Ernie stays
I’d get rid of both myself, but try to buy Gil out instead of void him. Hopefully, they can settle like the Celtics did with Vin Baker.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jan 27, 2010 3:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah this seems like
the best scenario, short of a trade that is. This way you avoid any chance of making other free agents think twice about coming here.
by CJHutch on Jan 27, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My concern is Arenas already doesn't want to deal with the Wizards
Which he should realize, at a certain point, is foolish, but you never know.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jan 27, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I had thought, too
But at the end of Lee’s blog entry, he seems to make a distinction for the first time, specifically saying that Gilbert doesn’t want to play for Ernie Grunfeld again, not that he doesn’t want to play for the Wizards. I know it’s still unlikely that Gil will play for the Wiz again (and I know a lot of people probably don’t even want him to) but that gave me a little hope.
"...at some point, when u r screaming for more minutes for Pecherov, you have to ask yourselves this question: 'If you keep adding more pineapple to a 'Papa Johns Pizza with Pineapple', when does it become a Papa Johns Pineapple with Pizza???'"
by Gilbert4SpaceJam2 on Jan 27, 2010 3:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yep - i caught that
and it was distinct on purpose
by arijordan on Jan 27, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yet another reason
to put him behind us. While I do think the situation could’ve been handled better by the team, he just doesn’t get that none of this would have happened if not for his actions. Maybe they should start putting “Maturity clauses” in these contracts. When Gil was 22, his behavior was “quirky”, and entertaining to some. But as he’s gotten older, he should have matured past that, and he hasn’t.
by CJHutch on Jan 27, 2010 3:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Another Sad Day
I am just sad that the basketball player who made the most direct emotional impact on my life might not ever play for wizards again. He Fd up and he is paying a steep price along with everyone that passionately follows this team.
"You taught me a lesson, I was going to give someone the benefit of doubt, and I almost did, then something said, no don't, don't, its not for you, its not my thing" Larry David,
by Mac G on Jan 27, 2010 3:50 PM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Do we think that Gil wants to be voided?
If so, would the player union fight on his behalf even if he doesnt want them too?
If he agrees to a buyout this year, does he not get the money do to his suspension? If its after the season how does that affect salary cap? If its during the season how does that affect the salary cap?
by Blatche4MVP on Jan 27, 2010 3:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Either he'd get whatever he gets bought out for his last four years at once
Or he gets it over the next four years. This year’s salary ain’t coming back to him.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jan 27, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Two words: Nut. Job.
Nobody with a stable mind gives up millions of dollars that he has a right to under a contract. No way anybody in his right mind would refuse to fight a year-long suspension when other players with guns lost at most a few weeks pay. I think most labor lawyers would tell you that suspension would be turned over in arbitration, easy, and he’d get his money. So you know what? The Zards aren’t going to get anything in trade value for this guy, unless the other team is successful in putting him in front of a panel of Shrinks.
by Tbonebullets on Jan 27, 2010 4:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no chance
he wants to be voided. He can talk about love for the game all he wants. He’s not walking away from millions and millions of dollars.To me, if he truly was “sorry for doing this to the team and its fans”, he would ask to have his contract drastically reduced and remain with the team to make up for the nothing he’s given us the last 3 years while getting paid.
by CJHutch on Jan 27, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Confusing
So the deal was that the judge/jury/executioner Stern gave the shorter suspension as long as Gil didn’t appeal. Couldn’t he just threaten a yearlong suspension to ANYONE just to get them to cop to a shorter suspension (even if it’s of the one game variety) since he is also the person that the appeal would go to?
That man has too much power concentrated in his hands.
by MR on Jan 27, 2010 4:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Didnt think I would have to say this for the 3rd or is it 4th year in a row now but I guess I have to wait another season to see my favorite player
by Unxpekted on Jan 27, 2010 4:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What does rest of the season mean?
End of the regular season, or does it include the Wizards likely lengthy playoff run?
by disgrunted on Jan 27, 2010 4:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
lol good question. Also, will he still be able to represent the Wizards at the draft lottery?
"I’m tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok." ~Shaq
by Max_in_Missouri on Jan 27, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oh he'll be back for the finals, no doubt
"how ironic - you came here with a mouse in a bottle, now YOU are the mouse in the bottle" - B.M. Smith
by little stevie colter on Jan 27, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
All Star game?
You guys are right. They really need to define this thing better.
by MR on Jan 27, 2010 5:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If anyone from BulletsForever is going to attend Ernie's presser
Here is my proposed question:
“Back when Eddie Jordan and Brendan Haywood were having difficulties, you often stated that, ‘Time heals all wounds.’ Does that apply to the situation with Gilbert, too?”
by disgrunted on Jan 27, 2010 5:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm really curious about this presser
I can’t figure out what the purpose is.
Are they going to actually say anything more publically than the “they used poor judgment… that stands in contrast to everything Abe Pollin stood for throughout his life” line we keep reading in their statements?
I guess we’ll see.
by Johnnie Futbol on Jan 27, 2010 5:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't go, unfortunately
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jan 27, 2010 5:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wizards mgmt were telling tbe truth
at that dinner I had with them about abandoning Gil if they hadn’t looked into voiding Gil’s contract. that is oddly comforting.
by ooba on Jan 27, 2010 6:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
espn.com says the best thing for everyone is to mend fences
and has this observation:
“Several teams are clearing cap space to get LeBron James this summer. Most or all will swing and miss. If one of those teams that misses is eager to show fans the world did not pass them by, Arenas has some star power and some statistics. And if you’re far enough under the cap to sign LeBron James, you’re far enough under the cap to make a lop-sided trade for Gilbert Arenas.”
http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/12645/stuck-together-gilbert-arenas-and-the-wizards
by Unselds on Jan 27, 2010 9:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good point
…but I think the only teams that would be a taker of Arenas’ contract would have to:
A) Not care about massively overpaying for talent
B) Not be overly concerned about winning
C) Have a coach that doesn’t require (or even encourage) defense
D) Want to sell tickets based on a marquee player’s name instead of their on-court results
So basically, the sooner that Donnie Walsh realizes he isn’t winning the LeBron sweepstakes, the better for the Wiz.
"I’m tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok." ~Shaq
by Max_in_Missouri on Jan 28, 2010 12:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















