Keys to the Palace: In search of balance
Last week's Keys to the Palace discussion led me to the conclusion that only having a key and lock isn't fair to everyone on the team. There are so many shades of gray in player evaluation to deem a player's week a complete failure or complete success. So as we head into this week's evaluations, consider some ideas for a medium grade for each week's evaluations. Share your best ideas in the comments.
Andray Blatche
Andray brought a little bit of everything to the table this week. He had a decent showing against the Mavericks, chipping in eight points and 4 rebounds as he began to break out of his funk. He showed flashed of the skill he brought earlier in the season against the Heat where he had 19 points, 11 rebounds, and 3 assists, albeit in a blowout loss. To close out the week Andray reminded us how often he struggles to stay consistent, scoring no points in 11 minutes against the Clippers.
Earl Boykins
Guards always seem to start off hot in Washington before regressing to the mean, and Earl Boykins is no exception. After carrying the team early in the season, Earl has begun to return to earth, putting up modest numbers in modest minutes, with the exception of Sunday against the Clippers, where he played less than four minutes, his shortest playing time of the season.

Caron Butler
On one hand, you have to respect that Tough Juice was willing to step and take responsibility for whether the team won or lost against the Mavericks, by breaking the play and trying to win the game. But he has to remember that even though he is the only one who can be held responsible for not scoring on that final possession, he's not the only one who has to deal with the consequences of his actions. Just because he pulled it off one time doesn't mean he will be able to pull it off every time, nor should he.
There's nothing wrong with carrying a team on your back from time to time, but there's nothing wrong with letting your teammates help you carry the load. That's what they are there to do.

Randy Foye
Foye continued to deliver points in his new role, averaging over 15 points per game in the last three outings, but his assists have fallen off sharply. As a starter, he has only had four games where he has put up less than 4 assists and three of those games came this week. Certainly, he isn't the only culprit for the team's issues with ball movement, but he has done little to combat the issue after doing a fine job last week.

Brendan Haywood
Like just about everyone else on the team, Haywood didn't bring his A-game against Miami, putting up 2 points and 2 rebounds against the Heat. There was nothing to complain about against Dallas and Los Angeles. In those two games, Haywood had a combined 31 points and 30 rebounds.
He continues to play well, but I'm perplexed about this quote from last night:
"This team right here has made one of the biggest improvements ... We're embarrassed because we shot jumpers instead of driving the ball to the basket. We're not embarrassed by losing to the Clippers."
Was there any doubt that you shouldn't be embarrassed to lose to the Clippers in the first place? They've won five more games this season while playing in a tougher conference. Other than the Nets, there isn't a team in the NBA that the Wizards should be embarrassed to lose to right now.
Mike James
Not a bad week for Mr. James. He was finally given a chance to prove himself on the court and he responded with 11 points. Granted, it took him 11 shots to get there, but you would probably be rusty too if you hadn't played a meaningful game since November 6th. He also came out with a book this week.
Antawn Jamison
Statistically, Jamison still has a strong case for an All-Star bid, despite an off-week. 15 points and 8 rebounds are an off-night for Jamison, but those are the combined numbers Jamison put up against Dallas and Miami. His performance against Los Angeles was back to normal, but it was not the best way for Jamison to make his push to be an All-Star reserve.

JaVale McGee
As hard as it is for JaVale McGee to get minutes, it is even harder for him to get assists. McGee hasn't tallied a helper since November 6th and he has only two on the season. On the bright side, he only has 8 turnover this year.

Dominic McGuire
It's not a good sign when you're placed on the inactive list so Mike James can get some playing time.

Mike Miller
The good news? Mike Miller has gotten more aggressive shooting the three-ball recently, with 11 attempts this week. The bad news? Miller only hit three of those long balls.
?
Fabricio Oberto
Oberto's plays has in a way mirrored the play of the Wizards as a whole. He had his season high for points in his first game of the season and he hasn't done much since.

DeShawn Stevenson
Remember when DeShawn used be called the Lock Smith? Oh, the irony.
Nick Young
Taking a look at the list of guards in their 3rd NBA season who average less than 8 points per game, less than 2 rebounds per game, and less than one assist does not bode well for a long future in the NBA for Nick Young. Unless you're a big Laron Profit fan, of course.
Flip Saunders
Flip should be commended for the job he's doing in the face of adversity. He hasn't let the drama sap him of his passion for coaching, which is a good sign that things will get better with time and some roster remodeling. Still, he can't be given a free pass for this season's debacle.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Nick Young
point is valid. It is close to make or break time for him. The problem is, he has shown flashes of having the ability to be a 20 point scorer. My question is, is he REALLy a worse option than some of the guys that are playing? Again, you’re not winning without him getting major minutes, why not try it with him getting those minutes.
If for no other reason then to see if he should be included in your “future.”
I think Flip is still trying to eek out an 8th seed by riding his more accomplished players. At this point, i’d rathersee what a unit with Foye, Young, McGuire, Blatche, and Mcgee could do. They may still lose, but I’ll bet it would be a lot mor eexciting to watch. Less pound pound pump, and more running.
I think Nick Young has been given a fair amount of opportunity to prove himself on the court, but still has remained inconsistent even when given consistent minutes.
That said, I think the biggest reason to play the vets heavy minutes right now is playing time is good for their trade value. After the trade deadline, I hope the Wizards have enough sense to actually use player rotations that represent a youth movement.
by Johnnie Futbol on Jan 26, 2010 8:13 AM EST up reply actions
Right Johnnie...
It’s the only logical reason i can see.
When, exactly , has Nick Young been given consistent minutes
and I mean for a significant run of games…. not just 37 minutes one night and 12 the next….
Point those games out to me…. I’d really like to see an 8 or 10 game run where Nick got 25 minutes or more……
Where is it?
Oh – ok… you cannot find one… OK then how about 20 minutes a game – a regular rotation player should get 20 minutes a night, right? A First round draft pick, in his 3rd season should be seeing at least 20 minutes a night, right? On a sucky team that won only 19 games last year, and on a pace for something similar this year… right? 20 minutes a night…. ?
NOPE – Instead what you see is 25 minutes one night and 2 the next… 17 minutes then 5. 37 then 14. 21 minutes, then 12.
He’s averaging less minutes this year than last (18 per game this year, vs 22 last year)…He’s had 15 games with less than 10 minutes this year….He’s never logged 25 minutes or more in a stretch of games lasting longer than 3 games. AND logged only one stretch of 6 games with 20 minutes or longer (In Nov-Early Dec….. The next longest stretch of 20 minute games is 3 games in a row)….
For some reason, Flip has bought into the Ed Tapscott system for playing Nick Young…. If he hits his first shot, he gets a chance to stay in the game until he makes his first mistake. If he doesn’t make any mistakes, he continues to play – but miss a couple of shots, or miss a defensive assignment – and he gets pulled. And it doesn’t seem to matter if he’s playing good defense or not… His defense this year has been steadily improving. At least, he’s not nearly the defensive liability at SG that Foye is for instance…. and he’s not nearly the Offensive liability that Stevenson is.
His usage rate is down from previous years (18.9), and his shooting percentage has dropped; indicating a player that may be losing his confidence. That’s not an uncommon thing.
Let’s not forget that Randy Foye went through a bit of a funk, when his minutes were screwed around with by Flip; yet, now he’s getting consistent minutes and his production has increased…. He’s getting 32.5 minutes a game in January and scoring 15.5 points per game on 47% shooting… In early December, when Flip wasn’t playing him, he was only averaging around 3 ppg, on 36% shooting.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
Fair amount of opportunity.....
I just want everyone here to remember these statements:
I predict when Nick Young gets traded to another team, they’re going to give him consistent minutes. He will become a starter within 1 year of the trade. He will become a 19 point per game scorer. He will become much better defensively, to the point where he will be considered an excellent perimeter defender.
I’d say similar things about JaVale McGee, but I don’t think the Wizards will trade him any time soon.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
Yep...
But anyway, we can look forward to the youth movement to begin on or around Feb 19… I wouldn’t worry too much about Nick; since we’re looking to start anew, it makes the most sense to hang on to prospects (after all those, and picks, are what we’ll be trading for anyway) So in my mind, the order of likeliness for the current youngins to stick around goes something like this:
1. McGee (no GM in his right mind would trade him at this point)
2. Blatche (decent to good production in a backup role – should rise greatly with Jamison gone)
3. Young (decent production in limited/unsteady minutes – greatly improved defense – minutes/production should go up after stevenson and/or mike miller get traded)
4. Taser (defensive potential out the yin yang but not much else – one of those unique pieces that’s hard to find and cheap to keep)
5. Foye (combo guard but skillset slanted towards sg and away from pg – undersized and not a great fit for Flip)
completely agree
Young will be yet another in a long list of players that the Wizards/Bullets gave up on way too early. Too bad this blog wasn’t around in ’99, cuz I said the same thing then about Ben Wallace.
Okay, okah... you win.
Perhaps you’re right. Let me just say, from what I’ve seen of him I’m a little skeptical, because he does look lost on the court from time to time.
That said, I do want these young guys – Foye, Young, Blatche and Mcgee – to get significant minutes following the trade deadline. And the Foye argument makes a lot of sense to me.
by Johnnie Futbol on Jan 26, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions
one thing...
For some reason, Flip has bought into the Ed Tapscott system for playing Nick Young….
But how much is this more reflective of Young than it is of Tapscott or Flip?
Over time there has been a lot of criticism here (and elsewhere) of player rotations, in particular when it comes to giving minutes to the younger players. The criticism is always directed at the coach, as if he for some reason “doesn’t get it,” yet each coach that follows (first Jordan, then Tapscott, then Saunders), repeats the same “mistakes.”
by Johnnie Futbol on Jan 26, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah - I certainly wouldn't call it a mistake to bench Young, McGee, McGuire, etc...
if the team was 29-14 and tied for 4th in the Conference with Atlanta…..
But they’re not… they are 14-29 and falling fast. Last year, at this time, the Wizards were 9-34 …………….
Given the records, I would call giving 40+ minutes to guys like Butler, Jamison, Arenas and Haywood the “mistake” . Obviously, I’m on the outside, looking in… but what the three coaches have in common is an inability to win games with the players that they are using.
At what point does the Coach say, “this sh*t ain’t getting it done” ?
We went ALL YEAR last year, suffering through a Coach that played the veterans to death. A “Coach” that refused to put in the youngsters for any significant time to see what they could do – to see if they can develop – to see what we have…. Instead, relying on “veterans” and has beens… All the while, amusing us with quips about the “Palace of Good Play” … Meanwhile, we fans were treated to the sewage from that Palace in the form of a 19-63 record.
How long do we wait THIS YEAR? Will Flip Saunders keep running Jamison and Butler out there for 40 minutes a game – put in guys who are hurt (like Miller), use has-beens like James, Stevenson and Boykins JUST so he can keep from admitting the Wizards are out of the Playoff hunt…. ?
Well, if this continues, we’ll be treated to more Flip post-game interviews where he says the team “lacked energy” – or “didn’t make enough plays down the stretch”… while we watch a team full of veterans stink up the Palace. Meanwhile teams like Memphis, Portland, and Oklahoma City are fighting for Playoff spots with young, energetic, and exciting players.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jan 26, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
That's what makes this so intolerable
When a team stinks and you have some young talent worth playing, then play them (unless their attitude and work ethic in practice is totally awful).
To continue to kowtow to these veterans who’ve been part of 2 dreadful teams in a row now is ridiculous. Please let us trade everyone we can (and hopefully get something decent back) and then we will be able to watch McGee, McGuire and NY.
"I say he does have to shoot me now! So shoot me now!" --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jan 26, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
playing the vets
It made sense when the perspective of the Wizards was “it’s only a matter of time before we’re healthy and can compete with anyone,” but I don’t think anyone believes in that perspective any more. The Big Three era is over.
Now, the only logic to playing the vets heavy minutes is to boost their stats and trade value before shipping them off to another locker room.
If it’s post Feb-19 and Javale McGee is still getting regular DNPs, for example, then there’s something really wrong with how this team is being handled.
by Johnnie Futbol on Jan 26, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
You want to increase the trade value for Jamison and Butler?
DECREASE their minutes.
Every GM and Coach in the League knows what Jamison and Butler can do. There’s no need to play them 40 minutes a game to “boost” their trade value…
As a matter of fact, if I’m a Playoff team, I want a FRESH Jamison on my squad – not one who’s been used up playing 40+ for a 14-29 team out of the Playoffs since December….
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
Jamison hasn’t shown any wear despite his age and years of playing heavy minutes.
Butler on the other hand isn’t playing well this season, and decreasing his minutes might send the wrong signal to other teams (i.e. he’s not what he once was).
Anyways, this is a debate I really don’t give a damn about. The only thing I’m really saying is if they don’t change their player rotations significantly after Feb 19th then the Wizards have their heads up their asses. If you want to say that about them right now, great.
by Johnnie Futbol on Jan 26, 2010 2:22 PM EST up reply actions
not to mention
Butlers value may be diminishing with his FG percentage. Teams have to be noticing his propensity for taking the jump shot (after pounding the air out of the ball). Plus, if he continues to “go rogue” at the end of games like he did last week, that could turn some teams off on him altogether.
I find it real hard to group Eddie Jordan as the "three coaches
what the three coaches have in common is an inability to win games with the players that they are using.
I really have a hard time with the bashing of Eddie Jordan on here. Inability to win games? He was the most succesful coach here in the last two decades. He went to the playoffs four times in his five full years here. Eddie Jordan won games here, I wouldn’t “group” him in with Flip and Tapscott. He made a very formidable team out of the 07-08 team without his best player. I think he deserves more credit than you’re giving him.
by SkinsWizStangs on Jan 26, 2010 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
yes
E Jordan was a good coach for this team, but his message got old. However, I am hesitant to heap too much praise on him. His inability to adapt to players, coupled with his penchant for playing “favorites” frustrated the crap out of me. And I’m not the only one, since it looks like Philly fans are having the same problem with him.
As for this statement
I wouldn’t "group" him in with Flip
You’re right. I wouldn’t either. Flip is a proven winner. He has a WINNING RECORD as a head coach. Jordan does not.

by 























