Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

Mike James on his 2009/10 season: "I've never been treated like this"

Game thread coming later, but no big one because of this. -Mike

WASHINGTON -- It was one of the early days of training camp, and Mike James looked great. He had shed 25 pounds and was running around the Virginia Commonwealth gym like he was a new player.  Flip Saunders proclaimed him one of the surprises of training camp, joking that James was allowed to keep his shirt off because he reported to camp in excellent shape.

Now, halfway through the regular season, James sits in his locker, shoulders slumped to the ground.  He's appeared in one game all season, and that was against the Indiana Pacers in a blowout loss in early November.  The team's starting point guard and third-string point guard have been suspended, and a journeyman formerly of the Italian League is the team's backup point guard.  The frustration was palpable on James' face.

"This is the toughest situation of my career," James says.  "I've never been treated like this."

James is upset that he hasn't even received a chance to play.  He figured that he would get his chance after an impressive training camp, but that chance hasn't come.  Now, he's frustrated and he says he hasn't been given an explanation.

"I was one of the best guards in training camp," James says, later adding that "[the Wizards] haven't given me a reason why I don't play."

James is trying to stay positive, saying several times that he's still working hard (first to the gym, last to leave) and that adversity only makes him stronger.  He's used to this kind of treatment, so he'll keep pushing on until he gets his chance.  But he also admitted he's thought of what it would be like if he was elsewhere.

"At the end of the day, I've been mocked a lot in my career. This ain't the first time I've been mocked. But, everyone that's mocked me, at some point, they've respected me."

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It's hard to disagree with James

How can you defend not giving James much of a chance when someone like Stevenson is getting put in the starting lineup? And that’s not to mention Boykins, who started off decent but has tailed off lately. I’m not a big Mike James fan, but it’s hard to figure out why he hasn’t been given some minutes.

by Matt K. on Jan 22, 2010 6:27 PM EST reply actions  

I agree

I don’t see why he isn’t playing. He is on the team might as well use him. Maybe he will do well. He isn’t lying about being good in camp.

by Danyon Rome on Jan 22, 2010 6:27 PM EST reply actions  

Given a choice between James and boykins as the backup

I’d take boykins.

James is more likely than boykins to jack a bad shot and less likely to run the offense. Boykins Has shown that he is very capable of taking bad shots and bogging down the offense dribbling the air outta the ball, don’t get me wrong, but he is still the lesser of two evils. Plain and simple. I’ll admit I didn’t attend training camp, but cmon it’s Mike James…

by jones-y on Jan 22, 2010 6:40 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

And

James also plays matador defense. He’s not as inviting a defensive liability as boykins, but at least boykins tries.

by jones-y on Jan 22, 2010 6:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Very interesting story line

I’m no Mike James fan, but as an old dude I can see it through his eyes. He busts his ass, and this team stinks, but he gets no burn.

At the end of the day (sorry for the cliche), there aren’t a lot of options. Either you’re trying to win (so you play Randy, Mike, Nick, and Earl at the guard spots) or you’re trying to build for the future (so you play Randy and Nick). Mike James just doesn’t fit. You could indict the trade, but AD hasn’t done anything since he left.

The real point, though, is he doesn’t make us any better. Does anyone believe we would have won ANY of the close games we lost if we had played him instead of Boykins? It’s not like he was going to take minutes from Gil or Caron. Like I said, I understand where he’s coming from, but I don’t see how playing him more would have benefitted the team.

by RamV on Jan 22, 2010 7:03 PM EST reply actions  

How about the possibility he could enhance his trade value.?

By not playing him, GM’s out there only see him as an expiring contract… but there are a few teams that need veteran back-up Point Guards – that, IF Mike James were playing well, ……..well…… anyone here think the Wiz will get a draft pick for Mike James?

But if he’s playing well….. maybe…………….

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on Jan 22, 2010 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

No way no how

His greatest value is as an expiring. Last year he was appallingly bad. He might be in great shape, but he’s still an older player that was never very good to begin with.

by steadyhand on Jan 23, 2010 6:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I trust Flip Saunders

I think James doesn’t play because it would be of no great value to the team. I feel bad for the guy, but the truth is that the only reason he hasn’t been released is because he has a big expiring contract. In a month, he’ll probably be out of the league. The Wizards can either feed him a line, tell him the truth, or just say nothing. They’ve opted to say nothing, and I can’t say I blame them. I hope Mike James is able to find some happiness outside of playing in the NBA.

by Stanicek on Jan 22, 2010 8:27 PM EST reply actions  

We've been in enough blowouts

it’s tough to see why he hasn’t gotten any minutes this year.

I have sympathy for him.

by MR on Jan 22, 2010 8:46 PM EST reply actions  

I assume you mean just to be nice

But the guy is making over $6M — I think that’s nice enough. The young guys benefit more from those minutes.

by steadyhand on Jan 23, 2010 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Mike James Should Have Played Tonight

He couldn’t have done any worse than any of the other players out there.

"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier

by cuppettcj on Jan 22, 2010 9:51 PM EST reply actions  

I think he was inactive.

But it’s time to see if he’s our secret weapon.

Playoffs here we come.

by MR on Jan 22, 2010 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow ... so much support for Mike James?

Just like the fortunes of the team have turned a 180, those who used to despise a Mike James sighting have done an about-face.

Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.

by Kyle Weidie on Jan 23, 2010 1:34 AM EST reply actions  

Mike James Blows

and he isn’t going to earn himself anymore value with some minutes here or there. If a playoff team is desperate for a third string PG we might get a tiny bit more value than his expiring contract currently gives us.
Bottom line
Who cares?
With his comments he is just damaging the franchise further and making it easier for teams to get real assets cheaper.

by forthepeople on Jan 23, 2010 4:15 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Randy Wittman Seems to "Get It"

Recent FanPosts

Small
Kaman worth going after?
Small
The Wiz have 4 players worth keeping.
Steve_small
This Is Where I Stand
Stan_marsh_small
Is Kyrie Irving already 'All Star' good?
Unseld_small
Keep the Three Burritoes
Small
Rebuilding the Washington Wizards
Small
Should Wiz try a 2 PG lineup
Small
How I Would Do It
Small
Where Is JaVale?
Kg_nasty_small
should the Vesely pick get Ernie fired?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

Photo_on_2010-12-10_at_10 Bullet Nation in Exile