Bullets Forever: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

So far, so good for Andray Blatche and Nick Young

RICHMOND -- Practice was pretty much over, and players were on their own.  Some were getting extra shots in, while others were lounging on the sidelines.  One guy, however, was with Assistant Coach for Player Development Gene Banks, practicing different post moves going in either direction.

You probably wouldn't have guessed that one guy was Andray Blatche.  Criticized in the past for his lack of dedication, Blatche has made a habit of making bold proclamations about his dedication to the game that he hasn't been able to back up.  But Blatche indeed was the one getting in extra work, something he says he's been doing all summer.

"I'm not going to lie to you guys, I wasn't taking it as seriously as I should have been," Blatche says. "Unlike what I did this summer.  This summer, I took a very serious approach."

Blatche and Nick Young are two Wizards who were criticized last year for their approach to the game.  Both had chances to nail down a ton of minutes with all the injuries, but neither really took advantage of their opportunity in the eyes of the coaching staff.  Both have vowed to be more serious this year, and thus far, their play is speaking volumes.

"They all played extremely well," coach Flip Saunders says, referring to Blatche, Young and Dominic McGuire.  Later, Saunders adds, "Those guys are coming in with the right attitude."

Star-divide

In yesterday's scrimmage, Young was the star, scoring off catch-and-shoot opportunities and in transition.  Saunders singled him out as someone who stood out during the scrimmage, and Blatche went so far as to say his pal may be the frontrunner for the starting shooting guard spot.

"Right now, I would think he's got it based on yesterday, as long as he keeps pushing," Blatche says. 

Young says Saunders' offense is simpler for him than Eddie Jordan's Princeton offense, which put the ball in Young's hands more to create off pick and rolls.  Saunders has been uploading clips of Reggie Miller and Richard Hamilton onto Young's iTouch, and Young has been a quick study. 

"It's mainly more coming off screens for me, less having the ball in my hands for pick and rolls," Young says. "I know Gilbert [Arenas] is going to have the ball in his hands, so I got to be a spot-up shooter and do anything to stay on the court."

Young says he wasn't negatively affected by the draft-day trade for Randy Foye and Mike Miller, two guys who play his position (at least it didn't seem like it, his first two words were "no, definitely.").  He says he's happy to play with talented players, but confident he will still fill a niche on this team.

"I know I got confidence in myself, playing with great players like that," Young says.  "I watched Mike [Miller] with T-Mac in Orlando, that was my favorite team, so I was happy about playing with him.  Foye is a great young player; [he can play] the 1 or the 2.  But my minutes will still be there."

Blatche also made headlines in the scrimmage when he delivered a hard foul on Antawn Jamison early in the first game to prevent Jamison from scoring an easy layup ("I'm not trying to hurt him, but no layups," Blatche says). 

The hard foul might be one more example of Blatche's supposed changed approach to the game, to go along with his jersey switch from 32 to 7 ("Work seven days a week").

"I'm in the gym seven days a week.  If I'm not in the gym, I'm lifting weights, I'm doing something to help my game out," Blatche says. "If it's running for conditioning, if it's coming coming in late at night and shooting 500 shots, I'm always doing something to get my game going."

Like Young, Blatche often had trouble remembering Eddie Jordan's offense, but Blatche echoed Young's thoughts about Flip Saunders' system, even though Saunders notoriously has a large playbook.

"It's more natural, it's just simple," Blatche says.  "I'm going to be in one of two positions: on the block or on the top of the key.  If I'm at the top, I'm setting screens, so it's pretty simple for me."

"I'm not going to go out this year and try to have a breakout year and try to score 20," Blatche says. 'I'm just going to go out there and play and make sure we get that W."

So, so far so good for the "new" Andray Blatche and Nick Young.  But the day couldn't pass without one reference to the Blatche and Young of the past.  When asked about the benefits of the new iTouches, which include the Wizards' schedule all the way up until next June, Dominic McGuire says one benefit for him will be that he won't have to rely on Young and Blatche to know when he's supposed to be on the team bus.

"Usually, I'd always call Nick or Andray, even though they're not that reliable when it comes to [schedules]," McGuire says.  "Every time [I have to figure out] when we gotta get on the bus, now I just reach over, touch [my iTouch], and I'm like 'Oh, we got to get on the bus at 9:15?  Ok.'  I don't have to depend on false information anymore."

0 recs  |  Comment 50 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Around SB Nation

Apastration

Mar 2010 from Canis Hoopus - 146 comments

Daily Links  3/14

Mar 2010 from CelticsBlog - 0 comments

Will Bynum Ain't No Schmuck

Mar 2010 from Detroit Bad Boys - 62 comments

Comments

Display:

Great updates, Mike

Hard not to be excited. I’d be interested in seeing how McGee is progressing, how they’re using him, and if they appear to think he’s the backup C, as opposed to Oberto.

by YellaFella on Sep 30, 2009 3:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

"I don't have to depend on false information anymore"

It’s little things like this that will go along way in the season. Using resources to keep the team connected and on time…it will help them stay focused and professional.

by Pryme on Sep 30, 2009 3:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I hope we can find a way to get Gil, Foye, NY, Miller and Caron enough minures

or, I guess I hope all of those guys are playing well to deserve minutes….I cant wait to watch this team

Is anyone else hoping that Stevenson is left out of the rotation? I know his ceiling, and its not high enough to help us beat the top teams in the east. Miller is who he is, and every team can user a shooter like him off the bench (especially when he can rebound and pass as well as he does). The question is how big a leap does NY make, and how does Foye adjust.

Please Blatche be the player you can be….please

by Blatche4MVP on Sep 30, 2009 3:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think it's possible (barring injuries)

The most even distribution:

PG: 36 minutes for Gil, 12 for Foye
SG: 24 for NY, 12 for Foye, 12 for Miller
SF: 36 for Caron, 12 for Miller

That would be 36 for Gil and Caron, and 24 for Nick, Foye and Miller. I don’t see all three of those latter players getting 24 minutes. I’m guessing that one is going to be playing 30 or so minutes, so that means at least one of the other two will have his minutes cut substantially. With that said, if Stevenson gets minutes, that means one of Miller, Foye and Young is likely glued to the bench.

Unless Flip tries to play Miller at PF, that is. I don’t like the sound of that, but then again, could he be worse defensively than Jamison?

by disgrunted on Sep 30, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can free up a few more minutes

I’ll be surprised if Gil plays 36. Should be more like 32 so long as someone like Foye can be a competent backup. And 36 might be a little high for Caron as well.

I wouldn’t be all that surprised to see some Miller at PF in certain situations, but that’s probably not going to make a big difference. And that distribution didn’t even leave any crumbs for McGuire.

by bwoodsxyz on Sep 30, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is a really good sign if we’re having trouble finding minutes for all our players. What a great team. I’m pumped.

My swag was phenomenal.

by se7en on Sep 30, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

was hoping that Gils and Carons minutes were closer to the 30 to 34 range, rather than the 34-38 range…at least during the regular season. Big fan of tightening the bench in the playoffs

by Blatche4MVP on Sep 30, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

36 minutes is too much for Caron and Gilbert

Also I hope Foye doesn’t get that many minutes at PG. It has been pretty conclusively proven that he is much less effective at the point and I hate seeing guys shoehorned into bad situations. Guys should be put into position to succeed. I think one of the SG’s is gonna get traded or hurt anyways so I think he’ll have plenty of minutes at the 2 and can slide over to the point for maybe like 5 minutes a game.

by BayAreaBullet on Sep 30, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quite a start to training camp

Not even two full days in, and these guys are already shattering the team record for most “saying the right things during training camp”.

I mean, seriously, this couldn’t all sound better even if the folks on this site were ghost-writing what we’d want to hear the players and coaches say.

Oct. 27th can’t get here fast enough.

by bwoodsxyz on Sep 30, 2009 3:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ha - that's so true.

i’m having a hard time tempering my expectations with all of these positive words coming out of richmond.

"a crab dribble is when you travel" - caron butler

by little stevie colter on Sep 30, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blatche's Work Ethic
“I’m not going to lie to you guys, I wasn’t taking it as seriously as I should have been,” Blatche says. “Unlike what I did this summer. This summer, I took a very serious approach.”

I fear that if Blatche’s hard work doesn’t pay off with enough playing time, he’ll be discouraged rather than determined. He’ll go back to his old ways. What makes this time different? Maybe he’s hit his ceiling? We’ve been waiting for Blatche’s outbreak for several years now.

My swag was phenomenal.

by se7en on Sep 30, 2009 4:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

How could he not get enought minutes?

He can back up both the 4 and 5. He will get plenty of opportunities to play, out of necessity if nothing else. If he finds himself on the bench, its because he deserves to be there.

by Blatche4MVP on Sep 30, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blatche would have to be horrible not to average 30 mpg this year

He’s the only viable PF backup and can also play center.

by BayAreaBullet on Sep 30, 2009 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta agree with you BayAreaBullet

7-day Dray will get his minutes…

I don’t see McGee getting more than 8-10 minutes…. at Center..
Haywood has never gone more than 27 minutes a night – I think Flip will realize how valuable Haywood is for the team defense – but I still don’t think he’ll get more than 32 minutes….

Historically Flip does not play his starters more than 32-36 minutes a night… So if Jamison plays 32, that leaves Dray with 18 minutes at PF and another 10-12 minutes at Center…

Oberto will get his minutes when any one of the others gets in foul trouble….

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on Sep 30, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

huh?

if jamison and haywood average 35 minutes a game each, that leaves 26 minutes to split between blatche, oberto, and mcgee at the 4 and 5.

on the contrary, blatche would have to play pretty f’ing awesome to get 30 minutes a game this year.

by DarrellWalkerFan on Sep 30, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haywood will not average 35 minutes

He has never played more than 28 mpg in a season. Even if we try to play him as much as possible I doubt conditioning and fouls would let him play more than 30-32 mpg on average. Right now Blatche is our best backup at both big men positions. He has a step on Oberto and McGee, in my mind, and is the only backup bigman who can play both positions. Unless Jamison and Haywood stay healthy all year and/or Oberto and McGee start playing better than Blatche, he should get 28-32 mpg. Of course I also factor the nights where Jamison twists a knee or ankle and misses a half and the 8 or so games Haywood misses a year into Blatche’s mpg. The mpg doesn’t have to add up to 96 minutes – for the big man position – when you factor in games missed to injury. In a given game though with Haywood and Jamison rolling and not winded or in foul trouble I agree Blatche would probably not get 30 minutes in that particular game.

by BayAreaBullet on Oct 1, 2009 1:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i concede that point, but blatche is still not getting 30

if you give 7 minutes back from my 35 minute haywood estimate that still gives you only 33 minutes (and jamison might well play more than 35 minutes a night) . blatche would have to get ALL those minutes. i don’t see that happening.

not really interested in arguing what happens when jamison or haywood are hurt. might as well argue what happens with minutes when blatche gets hurt. it’s pointless.

by DarrellWalkerFan on Oct 2, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The injury thing was just my way of saying

there is a difference between minutes in a given game and a mpg average. In theory all 5 of our big men could average 30 mpg if we had injury problems. I wasn’t arguing with you so much as trying to explain that our points aren’t mutually exclusive as you are talking about theoretical minutes in a certain game where everyone is healthy and I was talking about a minutes per game overall average. We could both be right. Blatche could average 30 mpg but never play that much in a game where everyone is healthy. It is impossible(unless every big man plays every single game) for our big mens total mpg to add up to 96 minutes. If someone is injured and misses games their mpg stays the same while their backups mpg goes up with the extra time. I was just saying I didn’t think you understood the statistical concept.

by BayAreaBullet on Oct 2, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

still not with you sorry

you went from saying:

>>Blatche would have to be horrible not to average 30 mpg this year

to saying AJ and BTH would have to be hurt a lot for Blatche to average 30 mpg this year.

the latter is true for sure. i sincerely hope that doesn’t happen.

by DarrellWalkerFan on Oct 3, 2009 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

just for kicks

mpg * games
25 * 60 = 1500
40 * 22 = 880
(1500 + 880) / 82 = 29.02

i think that estimate is relatively generous.

by DarrellWalkerFan on Oct 3, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

just FYI

my biggest issue is that i think 30 mpg is A LOT. frigging pau gasol has had years where he’s barely gotten 30 mpg. maybe that clarifies why i took issue with this.

that and the fact that if blatche is getting 30 minutes a night, and he hasn’t gotten considerably better, i don’t see that as being good for the wiz.

based on your posts i can already tell you think differently about both points, hence the disagreement.

by DarrellWalkerFan on Oct 3, 2009 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny Stuff

Dom McGuire

Why the hell was he relying on Young and Blatche for the schedule in the first place? Makes him look stupid, not the other two.

Andray Blatche

I’m not sure if a hard foul means hard work … I mean, Andray has always been good at fouling. What I’d really like to know is if it was a ‘good’ foul or not.

Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.

by Truth About It on Sep 30, 2009 4:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

“I’m not going to lie to you guys, I wasn’t taking it as seriously as I should have been,” Blatche says. “Unlike what I did this summer. This summer, I took a very serious approach.”

File that under the no sh*t file. He wasn’t fooling anyone around here, especially after we were burned by a certain other stalwart drafted right out of high school who expected star treatement and never earned it.

by bigity b on Sep 30, 2009 5:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

When he said it, he made it sound like it was some huge declaration that nobody could have figured out. All I was thinking was “no shit, sherlock.”

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Sep 30, 2009 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Foye At Point Guard

We almost need an open thread for each day of training camp. :) I was very happy to hear Foye was running at point in the drills (thx to Prada’s Twitter feed). Crittendon still scares me. Foye would be a much better backup PG.

My swag was phenomenal.

by se7en on Sep 30, 2009 6:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it's statistically proven Foye is much worse as a PG

I think it’s crucial that Critt matures this year or we trade for another PG. And I realize Foye at PG is better than Critt at PG last year but I think it’s stupid to make a big trade for Foye and then not put him in a position to succeed.

by BayAreaBullet on Sep 30, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do the statistics say that ....

In just Foye’s 4th season, and under a new coach who’s doing cool stuff like using ipods to teach, and around a much better cast, that Foye can’t improve to be a serviceable point?

We have a ton of guys capable of playing the two …. perhaps trying a talent like Foye at the point is the best way of hedging our bets/personnel … statistically speaking.

Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.

by Truth About It on Sep 30, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don't traditionally see major drastic changes in players like that

It’s pretty rare. Even Billups’ per-minute numbers didn’t take much of a jump before he got to Detroit.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Sep 30, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

both sides of the argument are valid

but i’d at the very least give him a look at the backup PG. it’s going to be up to foye to decide for the coach based on his play

by DarrellWalkerFan on Sep 30, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It only bothers me

Because with the way this roster is set up, I think the Wizards have no choice. If Foye is going to play at all, he’s going to have to play a lot of minutes at the 1. I’m not sure that suits his strengths, but some of Foye is better than burying him on the bench.

A trade would help clear things up, that’s for sure.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Sep 30, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OTOH

Even if it’s not his strength, he’d probably still be among the top 3 backup PG’s in the league.

by MR on Sep 30, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, but

We’re not asking him to be Chauncey, we just are (perhaps) asking him to be a serviceable backup.

Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.

by Truth About It on Sep 30, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

and – as a PG goes, Randy Foye has got to be better than some of the other back-up PG’s we’ve had here…… (Mike James, Donell Taylor, a worn out Chucky Atkins) – and a good sight better than using one of our SG’s as a Point, as Eddie Jordan did (Larry Hughes, Deshawn Stevenson, Juan Dixon, Roger Mason).

And right now, Foye’s a better option at PG than Javaris Crittenton (even though I think Javaris can be a very good PG one day).

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on Sep 30, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes ...

And I agree with Prada in a sense … in that it’s ‘somewhat’ unfortunate that Foye might ‘have’ to play Foye.

But that’s the roster Flip has been given and he has to work with the pieces.

BTW … I still like the trade though. If you can get talent (while retaining flexibility) and while giving up a very minimal amount of pieces that can help in the immediate future, then pull the trigger.

Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.

by Truth About It on Oct 1, 2009 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah I’m not saying he shouldn’t play there if he is the best option I just wish that wasn’t the case. The fact that he can play a little point appeals to me more in the sense that he can complement other combo’s and play with Arenas instead of being the backup pg. And your right Truth that he could made a big jump under Flip but it seems like that scenario so rarely works out. There are so many players in the league who were shoehorned into the PG spot because they were good passers for their position(Iverson, Hughes, J. Johnson, Roy, Diaw, Wade, Gordon, Barbosa, Crawford, etc) and then came into their own when allowed to play their natural position. I do think he will be the backup PG I’m just hoping Critt or someone else allows him to play most of his minutes at SG. I’m really high on Foye and I like the fact that he can fill in ably at backup even if that not the best use of his skills.

by BayAreaBullet on Oct 1, 2009 2:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In what way

has it been “statistically proven” that Foye can’t run PG? What red flags are you seeing?

I’m not saying he’s proven he can run point, but I don’t see how he’s proven he can’t. To quote myself:

I have to say I’m very interested to see what Foye might do as a PG on this team. He has already displayed some early-Sam Cassell-like abilities. (Differences being that Foye has posted fewer assists but is a better outside shooter.) If Flip decides to use him as the backup PG and can perk up Foye’s assist/TO numbers, Foye could prove to be a very valuable backup PG. Perhaps one of the best in the league? Foye has already cut his TOs to acceptable levels. His assist rate has been a flat 20%, however. But now he will have better weapons to pass to than ever before. By a long shot.

by bwoodsxyz on Oct 1, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where did I say he "Can't play the Point"?

I just said he is better as a combo guard at the 2. When he was traded Truth and Prada(among others) crunched his numbers and he is definitively less effective as a PG. His PER is much better as a SG. His assist/turnover ratio is better as a SG and his shooting percentages go down when he moves to point. He also is more foul prone as a PG. Does that mean he can’t be an effective(or even excellent) backup PG? No, it just means he is better as a 2 guard. I thought I made that clear with the examples above. Wade, Iverson, Roy were pretty good PG’s but were just much better at their natural SG position. It’s pretty clear Foye is gonna be the backup PG and I’m fine with that as it’s the best option short of trade or Critt taking a big step. We would just be getting better production out of Foye if he played the bulk of his minutes at SG. Foye could take a big step as a PG under Flip but it would be surprising. I just think it would be nice if we could balance the roster better and put our best players in the best position to succeed.

http://www.truthaboutit.net/2009/08/who-is-randy-foye.html
http://www.bulletsforever.com/2009/7/26/963603/randy-foye-is-a-worthwhile
http://www.otrbasketball.com/forums/topic/751-6-reasons-why-nick-young-is-probably-a-goner/
http://www.82games.com/0809/08MIN4.HTM#bypos

by BayAreaBullet on Oct 1, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stat-heads tend to only look at Offensive numbers

Whereas – I look at 6’2" Randy Foye at Shooting Guard trying to guard the Other Team’s Shooting Guard

Just looking at the Eastern Conference starting Shooting Guards:
6’6" Joe Johnson (ATL), 6’6" Vince Carter (ORL), 6’6" John Salmons (CHI), 6’6" Andre Iguodala (PHI), 6’5" Ray Allen (BOS), 6’6" Anthony Parker (cle) , 6’6" Quentin Richardson (NYK), 6’7" Chris Douglas-Roberts (NJN), 6’5" Raja Bell (CHA), 6’7" Rip Hamilton (DET), 6’9’ Mike Dunleavy (IND), 6’6" Michael Redd, 6’5" Marco Belinelli OR 6’7" DeMar DeRozan (TOR), and even 6’4" Dwyane Wade (MIA)

You want Foye giving up 3-4 inches every night, playing at SG?

Now, playing against the Bench guys, at SG, then there’s a difference:
6’5" Jamal Crawford (ATL), 6’4" Tony Allen (BOS), 6’5" Gerald Henderson (CHA), 6’1" Jannero Pargo (cHI), 6’3" Delonte West (CLE), 6’3" Ben Gordon (DET), ETC…… (see a pattern here?)

If Foye wants to play, his best chance is as a back-up PG or back-up SG…
Mike Miller (6’8"), Nick Young (6’7"), DeShawn Stevenson (6’5") and Dom McGuire (6’9") all have a better chance of playing against the big shooting guards in the East.

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on Oct 1, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mike Miller and NY are taller but not better defenders

I can’t say I agree with your argument when it applies to those 2. Just because they are taller doesn’t mean they are a better defender. Obviously NY might figure it out as his problems were effort and focus on the D-end. That is not a given though. You are right that Foye defends the 1 better than the 2 but I think the only 2 guard we have who is a better defender at the 2 right now is DS. I don’t consider DM as a 2. We can masquerade him there like having Songalia at the 5 but thats not his position. Also we have bigger PG’s. Arenas and Critt are both 6’4" and can rotate to the 2 defensively if needed while playing the 1 on O. Baron Davis and Monta Ellis did this succesfully. So yes I do want him giving up the inches unless it is proven that NY and MM are better defenders. I’m not holding my breath.

by BayAreaBullet on Oct 1, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Foye is not exactly known for his Defense…. and don’t sleep on Mike Miller… He’s not especially quick, but in Flip Saunder’s match-up zone, he’s gonna be very good disrupting outside shooters.

I have a series on the match-up zone coming up later (probably in about a week) – and the type of players that can excel in that defense.

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on Oct 1, 2009 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah I can't really get a consensus on Foye's D abilities

Hollinger says this “Foye is a strong defender at the point — he’s big for the position but also can move his feet and cut off penetration. Because of his strength he can also defend shooting guards, and as he gains more experience he should be an above-average defender at both positions.”
I know he was considered a good defender coming out of college but I haven’t really found a definitive take. I’m not sure either way obviously so I look forward to your analysis next week.

by BayAreaBullet on Oct 2, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry

Just plain misread what you meant by the title of your comment. I thought you were saying he was worse as a PG than Crittenton is, not that he is worse as a PG than a SG.

by bwoodsxyz on Oct 1, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Backup PG

I think Foye will surprise us. We’ll be just fine. Your second-string backcourt is pretty damn amazing with Foye/Miller – assuming my ‘dark horse’ wins that starting 2 spot. :)

Holy hell guys, let’s be excited.

My swag was phenomenal.

by se7en on Oct 1, 2009 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

AND HE DID!

For now at least.

My swag was phenomenal.

by se7en on Oct 6, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

AND HE DID!

For now at least.

My swag was phenomenal.

by se7en on Oct 6, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Am I in the twilight zone?

Young AND Blatche working hard? I can’t believe it. What a difference a day (or a coach) makes.

by bigrm18 on Sep 30, 2009 7:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Cautious Optimism here

I remember some of the same said last season. Every sign so far has been positive but I won’t believe it till I see them play in a real game.

by Fundefined on Sep 30, 2009 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.
Start posting about the Wizards »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Next Year's Roster

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Question
Small
The most logical FA target for 10-11
Chesspiece-web_small
JaVale McGee and Hassan Whiteside
Small
Is Gilbert Arenas any worse than Stephon Marbury?
Small
How Would You Fix It?
Homer_small
Who will people be rooting for in the playoffs?
Puppybadge_small
Open Thread: CAA Tournament
Small
Bill Walker- another possible bad trade for Grunny?
Small
Potential 6-10 picks in the 2010 draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

BOSTON - MARCH 17:  Paul Pierce #34 of the Boston Celtics makes a move to the basket against Al Harrington #7 of the New York Knicks on March 17, 2010 at the TD Garden in Boston, Massachusetts.  (Photo by Brian Babineau/NBAE via Getty Images)

Pierce Scores 29 In 24 Minutes, Celtics Beats Knicks 109-97

Cleveland Cavaliers' LeBron James (23) shoots over Indiana Pacers' Brandon Rush in the fourth quarter of an NBA basketball game Wednesday, March 17, 2010, in Cleveland. James scored 32 points in the Cavaliers' 99-94 win that clinched the Central division title. (AP Photo/Mark Duncan)

LeBron's Near Triple-Double Lifts Cavs Over Pacers, 99-94

Toronto Raptors forwards Chris Bosh, left, and Andrea Bargnani (7) try to defend against Atlanta Hawks forward Josh Smith, center, during first-half NBA basketball game action in Toronto on Wednesday, March 17, 2010. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press,Frank Gunn) +1 updates

Bosh's Last-Second Game-Winner Gives Raptors 106-105 Win Over Hawks

More from SBNation.com >


Lead editors

Bullets-forever_4458_small Mike Prada

Puppybadge_small JakeTheSnake

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Contributing editors

Big_small Truth About It

Contributing writers

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz