Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Ernie Grunfeld on Gilbert Arenas' knee injury rehab controversy: "That's in the past"

The question hung in the makeshift press conference area for 10 minutes, waiting to be asked.  Everyone knew it had to be broached, but nobody knew exactly how to put it in a way that would illicit a somewhat substantial answer.

We already heard the questions about the "buzz" surrounding the team, the high expectations and the like.  (Of course, we also heard the gospel choirs down the hallway that commandeered the normal press room in order to stage their own competition).  All that was left was for someone to pull the trigger on the most contentious question.

Finally, Michael Lee stepped forward and put himself out there to Ernie Grunfeld.  [Note: The next question isn't verbatim what Lee's asked.  I honestly don't remember how he phrased it].

"So ... uhh about Gilbert Arenas' recent comments in the Times about his injury rehab."

"Obviously you get frustrated when things aren't going well.  The bottom line is that he's healthy."

Someone else (again not verbatim): "Uhh ... could you possibly elaborate?"

"I've talked to him about it, it was a small part of the bigger conversation he had, but that's in the past.  We've learned some things from it probably and he's learned some things from it probably.  The bottom line is that he's healthy, he's feeing good and we're going to move forward from it."

If anyone came in expecting to here something significant from Ernie Grunfeld about that, then they would have left disappointed.  Then again, anyone expecting Ernie Grunfeld to say anything earth-shattering about anything was probably going to be disappointed.  These are GM's we're talking about, and Ernie's always been one of the most tight-lipped.  It's just how he is.

Some more highlights from the press conference below the jump, besides the part about the Wizards' use of advanced stats.

Star-divide

Ernie on roster chemistry: "You can't just say 'Poof' and it's going to happen.  It's a process.  It's going to take some time to learn the system.  It's going to take some time for Flip [Saunders] and his staff to figure out how they can best use the talent at their disposal."

Later: "Flip is going to have a lot of different options, and it's going to be a process to see which combinations work the best." 

And finally: "It's not bad to have a deep team and compete for minutes.  Have competitive practices.  Have a competitive training camp."

(First user to suggest a "process" drinking game gets a gold star).

Ernie on building around the Big 3 (after tsk-tsk-ing Michael Lee for mentioning that "some writers, media people" (rather than a specific person) have criticized that strategy: "I think that when they did play together for an extended period of time, they won a lot of games."

Ernie on defense: "Obviously, we have to put more of an emphasis on the defensive end.  Players have to buy into it a little bit.  Now, look, we're not going to give up on the offensive end -- we're a pretty good offensive team and have a lot of firepower.  It's just doing the little things.  The conceptual things are going to be a little different, and the players  themselves have to buy into what you're doing."

Ernie on Andray Blatche: "We're not asking him to come in and average 15-20 points a game.  We're just asking him to come in, play hard every single night and do what the coach asks of him."

Ernie on Flip Saunders' style: "He and I were laughing [about how] his playbook is so thick.  Well, out of that playbook, he may only use 3 or 4 of the pages depending on what works for the current players that he has.  It's going to take him a little bit of time to see the players and get familiar with their strengths and weaknesses."

Ernie on the Wizards' 2010 expiring contracts and free agents (somewhat misunderstanding Michael Lee's question IMO): "We'll have to see where the cap is and act accordingly.  But that's next summer.  We'll deal with those issues, but obviously we'd like to keep those players."

Ernie on sponsored practice jerseys: "Not yet, but that's something that might be in the works."

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Does Ernie even care about defense?

Read his answer on defense. Could he minimize its importance and the team’s deficiencies any more than he does? How will the team make significant improvements if the GM doesn’t make strong demands and statements on the subject, but instead just shrugs the topic off?

by disgrunted on Sep 25, 2009 8:07 AM EDT reply actions  

To me

He seems like the type that shrugs a lot of thing off when talking to media. He doesn’t really say a lot. I guess he likes to not have eveyone know what he is thinking.

by Danyon Rome on Sep 25, 2009 10:14 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I think you're right

Some say he’s playing the media and spinning things for us, but I just think he’s uncomfortable.

Too much dealing with the New York media is my guess.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Sep 25, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

What do you guys expect him to say? Single out players that aren’t in the teams plans? Dump on individuals? Call people out? He’s the GM. He’s not going to say anything remotely controversial, daring, or even interesting.

by MR on Sep 25, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

No ....

At least I don’t expect that … and I’m pretty sure Mike is in the same boat … it’s just that Ernie is not a “personality”

Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.

by Kyle Weidie on Sep 26, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Most GMs are better at saying nothing in a more dynamic and inviting way

I mean no disrespect to Ernie, but it’s almost as if he doesn’t think you know anything about anything. For example, he got asked about sponsoring practice jerseys and his response was “yeah, that’s a new trend around the NBA, you know” Obviously the guy knew that … why else would he ask the question?

I’m sure Ernie doesn’t mean to be rude, but it just seems like he’s wary of answering any question in any way. He got killed by the New York media, so I suspect that might be a reason why.

Then again, he’s the only GM I’ve ever actually talked to, so I might be wrong here.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Sep 26, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

seems par for the course for any press conference for any public figure. They are there to seem like they are answering questions without giving any new info at all.

by MR on Sep 27, 2009 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Perhaps

But compare Ernie’s answers to, say, Otis Smith’s from this interview or Kevin Pritchard from this story, and there’s a major difference in substance.

Those guys tell you something. Ernie literally tells you nothing.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Sep 27, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I totally forgot to mention the best part of the afternoon

From TAI:

Later, after the ‘official’ presser was over and a couple of us hung around in an informal, but ‘on the record’ session, I posed the question to Ernie, "Going back to the things that ‘unnamed people’ say, some people don’t feel [the Wizards — but of course, I said ‘we’ here] have the front court depth to fit the ‘Defense Wins Championships’ mold, so are you going to be proactive from day one or sit back and see if other teams present opportunities [for the Wizards] to improve?"

Grunfeld responded, again, with a canned answer: "I can’t comment on what certain people say because I don’t know who these certain people are. You know, that’s sports. Certain people say a lot of things. I can’t go comment on what Joe from the street corner is saying."

At that point, I really wasn’t going to retort by saying that’s what I believed. It was my first time meeting the guy, so my credibility only goes so far. But that’s when the Washington Post’s Mike Wise jumped in, saying, "I completely agree with him though."

Grunfeld responded, "Well … what do you say, Mike?"

Wise: "I’m saying your front court needs help, you’ve got all these guards."

Grunfeld: We’ll see … that’s my answer."

(all around laughter from the peanut gallery)

Mike Wise=my hero.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Sep 25, 2009 10:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Antonio Daniels

http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/61760/20090925/minnesota_plans_to_trade_antonio_daniels/

Any chance we trade Mike James back for Antonio Daniels. I guess we might take on a little more salary, but I trust Daniels more as a backup pg and I know he has chemistry with these guys.

by forthepeople on Sep 25, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Randy Wittman Seems to "Get It"

Recent FanPosts

Tumblr_lpbvdtzztv1qc7c5to1_500_small
Best 2012 Draft lottery options?
Steves_small
Attention Mr. Stern - The Big Markets will kill the NBA
Tumblr_lpbvdtzztv1qc7c5to1_500_small
Kaman worth going after?
Small
The Wiz have 4 players worth keeping.
Steve_small
This Is Where I Stand
Stan_marsh_small
Is Kyrie Irving already 'All Star' good?
Unseld_small
Keep the Three Burritoes
Small
Rebuilding the Washington Wizards
Small
Should Wiz try a 2 PG lineup
Small
How I Would Do It

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

Photo_on_2010-12-10_at_10 Bullet Nation in Exile