Why I won't be surprised if Dominic McGuire gets a spot in Flip Saunders' top eight
Guessing Flip Saunders' player rotation in August isn't going to be easy when there are so many players who have started games for their respective teams in the last two years. Hell, it's already en vogue for us to throw out names of Wizards that we "shouldn't forget about," as some of us already have.
So take this declaration as an educated guess of sorts, since it's the best we can do at this point.
Okay. There's one guy who has started to become an afterthought that has a much better chance of cracking Flip's top eight than most believe. Yes, it's true that the Wizards just traded for two guys that can play his primary positions. It's also true that he plays the same position as DeShawn Stevenson, a returning starter from two years ago provided he remains healthy. But judging from Flip's past history, I'd say this guy's got a great chance to vault into the top eight.
That guy is Dominic McGuire.
A case for Dominic McGuire to crack the rotation has to begin with what he's done as a Wizard. In a season where pretty much nothing went right, McGuire was the only guy who displayed some growth. He was provided an opportunity when Ed Tapscott took over and did enough to earn over 26 minutes a game. We can argue forever over whether McGuire deserved his opportunity, whether he played as well as the coaching staff thought or whether he was given a longer leash compared to the team's other young players, but the bottom line is that he stayed consistent enough to play very important minutes.
The case for McGuire also has to include the argument that he provides a unique skill set. We've fallen a bit too much in love with McGuire's defense -- it's got potential, but he still loses his man too easily off the ball -- but the very fact that he emphasizes defense over offense makes him a unique player on this roster. McGuire's also one of the best rebounding wings in the league (his rebound percentage of 12.1% would have put him fifth among small forwards if John Hollinger actually listed him there) and he won't use up too many possessions and steal shots from the offensive-minded guys on the team. Plus, in a rotation that gives eight guys most of the minutes, you need players who can swing between positions like McGuire.
However, the best case for Dominic McGuire would be to simply look back at Flip Saunders-coached teams. Every single successful Flip Saunders team has given major minutes to a defensive-oriented, long wing player who can stand at the point of Flip's zone (or guard the other team's top wing) and quarterback the defense. In Detroit, of course, that guy was Tayshaun Prince, who obviously has much more of a polished offensive game than McGuire, but is a very similar type of player. As the point man in Saunders' zoneish schemes, Prince's length and quickness helped keep Detroit near the top of the defensive rankings. McGuire possesses the same type of length and quickness even if he doesn't have the polish or the offensive game.
But the best case study for McGuire involves considering Saunders' tenure in Minnesota. During the 2003/04 season, when the Timberwolves won 58 games and would have made the Finals if Sam Cassell didn't get hurt in the playoffs, Trenton Hassell of all people averaged 28 minutes a game despite scoring just 6.5 points/36 minutes and posting a pathetic 8.2 PER. Like Washington, the 03/04 Timberwolves had a lot of offensive names. Cassell and Latrell Sprewell were just acquired, and despite being vets, they still were very good offensive players. Flip also had Wally Szczerbiak, formerly the second option behind Kevin Garnett, and Troy Hudson, an offensive-minded combo guard who had a great playoff series against the Lakers in 2002/03. And yet, among that mix, Trenton Hassell of all people ended up playing the fourth-most minutes per game on the team.
Why? He played defense and didn't use any possessions offensively to hurt his team. That earned him significantly more playing time than offensive guys like Szczerbiak and Hudson.
There are a lot of statistical similarities between Hassell's 2003/04 season and McGuire's campaign last year. The teams are also set up in a similar way -- Washington, like Minnesota then, has a lot of offensive-first name guys. Other than Kevin Garnett and possibly veteran center Ervin Johnson, nobody on the Wolves leaned defense-first ... except for Hassell. That alone got Hassell a ton of minutes despite his major limitations.
Hassell's case is a good precedent for Dominic McGuire. Don't be surprised if we see history repeat itself.
0 recs |
68 comments
|
Comments
Compelling argument
But if that’s the case, then we are paying way too much for redundant guards. One of Young/Foye won’t play at all. Foye can steal minutes at PG so Young is probably the odd man out.
EG needs to figure out the long term plan here. It’s a waste to keep a talented guard like Young so deep on the bench (not to mention a serviceable player like Stevenson). There needs to be a consolidation trade where we combine all these spare parts for one quality player.
by nate33 on Aug 7, 2009 11:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If last year taught us anything,
it’s that you can’t assess the depth of the team during the off-season. You need to measure it during training camp and the season. If Caron or Miller or any wing player blows out a knee, the Wizards no longer have too many wing players.
by disgrunted on Aug 7, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'll get no argument from me on that, nate
It’s one reason I didn’t really like the Foye/Miller trade.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Aug 7, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think there has to be another trade in our future. Young, Foye, Critt, DSteve. One of these guys.
by MR on Aug 7, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Am I the only one that thinks that shoot first shoot second Nick Young might get cut out of the rotation? Foye or Miller are more than capable of being scorers off the bench, and are more reliable. Dominic brings versatility and the ability to gaurd multiple positions. Young+Stevenson for someone sounds good.
by tw10 on Aug 8, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Young, Stevenson and James for Battier sounds better
I don’t know how close the salaries are, but I’d love to bring in an elite defender. Nick Young’s my favorite Wizard, maybe favorite player period, but I can’t see how we’ll be able to keep him, regardless of how good he is. Houston needs scoring, especially now that Von Wafer is gone, and it’s not like they’ve got much use for an intangibles guy when Yao’s out for the season and TMac won’t be back until January or later. I’d love to snatch up Hayes or Landry, too, even if it means giving up Blatche and a pick or something.
by pantslessyoda1 on Aug 9, 2009 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, totally off topic
I’m just curious what about Young makes him your favorite player? He frustrates the heck out of me. He seems like a ballhog/black hole who is self-perpetuating because he actually can make some of the really tough shots he sets himself up for, so he thinks it’s ok to keep shooting them. But I imagine as a teammate who is open for a jumper, watching NY force up something must be frustrating too. At least that’s how I feel when I’m playing with someone like that. I’m hoping that he’ll mature out of it and I’m totally open minded about him if he does.
So now that you know where I’m coming from, I ask in all good faith why you like him so much. Maybe I can understand the guy better.
by MR on Aug 9, 2009 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like him as a player and as a character
As a player, I’m genuinely intrigued by how effortlessly he can score, and the self-perpetuating blackhole thing is a large part of it. Not only does he score in volume with respectable efficiency numbers, he does it in the most difficult ways possible. I figure that if he can have a ts% of 53 taking nothing but fadeaways off the dribble from 18 feet, he could put up similar numbers to Ben Gordon as far as being able to score a lot with nice percentages once he learns to come off screens (which he seems to have done this summer), draw fouls (which Sam Cassell and hopefully Gil should help him with), and post up more often (which ideally Flip will encourage). Right now, I can see how he’ll hurt ball movement, but the fact that he has the ability to create a decent shot at any time by just going one on one from anywhere is pretty valuable if it’s used right. His all around game needs work and I’m especially worried about his lack of rebounding, but he’s tall, long, and quick enough to be a decent defender. I don’t think he’s going to be TMac, but I like to think that he could eventually be an above-average starting shooting guard or sixth man of the year candidate.
As a character, I like that he’s very funny despite overcoming a lot of adversity. I like athletes I can connect to in some way (which is why I like Gil, Baron Davis, and Nash so much while being generally disinterested in Kobe, Lebron, Wade, and a lot of guys like them), and Nick Young seems like one of them. He’s also pretty fun to watch, too, since it seems like every shot he takes comes with a high degree of difficulty or else it’s some kind of dunk.
So I guess I’m a bit of a homer as far as he’s concerned, but even overlooking my obvious biases, I think that he’s a great guy to keep around. It’s pretty likely that we’ll trade him since Foye is more polished, McGuire fills more needs, and Stevenson is less attractive to other teams, but I’d still prefer to keep him over any of them, even if it’s only because I think that he’ll eventually be seen as superior to all of them.
by pantslessyoda1 on Aug 11, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the reply
I see where you’re coming from. I think he’s an appealing guy—a little like Webber in that you just have to like him, yet you wish he’d grow up a little faster and you want to tell him ‘you have less time than you think, you should take things more seriously’.
I think he could and probably will mature both his game and his attitude and if that happens he’ll be a valuable player to have around. At the moment he is very frustrating to me, probably in the same way that a teacher gets frustrated at a very bright but underachieving student.
by MR on Aug 11, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Someone like Hassell will make the top 8
It seems that McGuire is competing with Stevenson for that kind of spot. I will be very surprised (though kind of pleased) if both Stevenson and McGuire make Flip’s 8 man rotation (if there is indeed an 8 man rotation). I’m guessing Young is competing with Foye for a spot, though Foye can hopefully also play backup PG.
by disgrunted on Aug 7, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Deshawn vs Dom
I like this post. And, the more I think about it, the more I like the idea of one of them being the starting SG, with Miller getting just as many, if not more, minutes off the bench.
I’ve really struggled with the question of just how good Dom’s defense really is, but I’ll throw this out there: the team allowed more points per possession with him on the floor last year, than with him off. Make of that what you will—the team’s defensive on/off stats from last year are just perplexing. Young, Blatche, and Songaila come out far and away the best on the team by that measure. Looking at the 5-man groupings doesn’t much help explain it. Maybe they lucked out due to sample size issues. Maybe playing less than McGuire did with our starters and against opposing starters is the difference. Anyway, I haven’t yet found much evidence that supports what I’d like to think—that McGuire is an effective team defender.
Anyway, though, I really have a hard time putting McGuire ahead of a healthy Stevenson unless he finds something he can do well/consistently on offense. I would love to see McGuire with a Bowen-esque corner 3.
by bwoodsxyz on Aug 7, 2009 12:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes stats just don't tell the story
Looking at only one year of on/off stats could be misleading….
But watching Dom McGuire in actual games, it’s obvious that he puts in the effort on the Defensive end; and is developing into a defensive stopper. Yes, yes, I know Mike, he still sometimes loses his man, and occasionally gets lost in rotations….. but besides Haywood, Oberto (and perhaps the 2005-06 version of Stevenson), McGuire is the best defender left on the team. (with Young, closing in at number 5)…..
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Aug 7, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly right Rook....
McGuire may let a guy get by him, but it’s because he’s lacking fundamentals and instinct, not effort.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.
by Truth About It on Aug 7, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think stats can be misleading and this is one of those times. He is a good on-ball defender as well as a helpside defender
by tw10 on Aug 8, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is he a wing?
WTF? He’s the same size as Antawn and he doesn’t ever jack up a three. SF or PF, but not a wing. Why would anyone think of starting him ahead of Miller at that position anyway? Besides, who else is going to back up Caron at SF?
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
by GeoFly on Aug 7, 2009 12:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You do know he played shooting guard last year, right?
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Aug 7, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting quirk
82games slotted McGuire as a 3 and Caron as a 2 for all of the playing time they had together.
by bwoodsxyz on Aug 7, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, that does make sense in retrospect
Caron was essentially the 2 last year.
Still, the 3 is the wing.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Aug 7, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
but, as your picture illustrates, he guarded the 2 a lot. I do think he’s a better fit at the 3 though, especially on offense.
by CJHutch on Aug 7, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea ....
It seems that they switch on offense/defense …
McGuire guarding the 2nd guard, but Caron playing the shooting guard role in the offense.
Guess those type of adjustments are hard to account for.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.
by Truth About It on Aug 7, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
McGuire does the Battier defense
guard the best offensive player on the other team, because he’s the best defensive player on his team. But yeah, Dom is a 3 to me; too big to be considered a 2.
Constant passenger of the Jason Campbell Bandwagon since 2007. Keep on driving, brother.
by kseandoyle on Aug 7, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes I do. You do know they listed him at both positions last year, right?
They listed him at both F and G in plenty of games last year. So what, last year was an abomination anyway.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
by GeoFly on Aug 7, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the 3-pt shooting helps Stevenson make more sense at the 2 than McGuire does. I certainly wouldn’t mind Miller as the starting 2, but using him as the “firepower off the bench” notion is appealing, especially with the starters already having so much offensive ability.
Miller can back up Caron at SF.
For what it’s worth, here are their officially listed sizes:
Jamison 6-9 235
McGuire 6-9 220
Miller 6-8 218
Butler 6-7 228
Stevenson 6-5 218
So, McGuire and Miller are essentially the same size.
by bwoodsxyz on Aug 7, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't really agree about Stevenson over McGuire
Can Stevenson point a zone? That’s my biggest concern, although looking at that starting lineup, nobody shoots a three all that well.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Aug 7, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you play a matchup zone rather than a true 3-2, does it matter as much?
by bwoodsxyz on Aug 7, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know, I haven't really studied Flip's zone up close
My guess is, if we see the Flip Detroit defense, then yes. If we see the Minnesota defense, then no.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Aug 7, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting topic
One of the amazing things with our roster is that I wouldn’t be surprised to see any particular player getting regular time (being one of the final 8). I don’t recall ever being able to say that before.
I’d love to hear people’s predictions on who the final 8 will be, although I really think as we’ve seen that it will be more like 9 than 8.
by MR on Aug 7, 2009 12:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Still think the "Starting 8" is just a message
to get the players motivated. If everyone’s going to get a shot to play just so, where’s the motivation? This way, players know that they have to compete if they want playing time.
That being said, Dom should get minutes because if nothing else he’s proven to be one of the team’s better defenders.
by Pryme on Aug 7, 2009 1:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope not
The team should play to its strengths – pushing the ball and three point shooting, and being one of the top offenses in the East. I just don’t buy that Stevenson/McGuire’s defense will have enough impact on the team’s defensive output to justify playing time over clearly more qualified offensive players. Let’s hope Flip’s schemes on the defensive end improve us as much as anything.
by mfish on Aug 7, 2009 1:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Flip's own words right before training camp
"He’s a multi-dimensional player, I think he can almost play four positions. We haven’t tried to play him at the 1, but he has a great…very good ball-handling skills for a player of his size. Today (Saturday) we used him as 3, the 4 and the 2. So actually he learned three spots today, so he’ll have a lot of pressure during this camp in terms of understanding everything we’re doing."
if this holds true, McGuire will definitely crack the rotation
twitter.com/rashad20
by rashad20 on Aug 7, 2009 1:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A tad bit of smoke from Flip
Trying him at the 1?
It’ll never happen.
“Very good ball-handling skills for a player of his size”?
Sure, but mediocre ball handling skill for a guy playing a wing position.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.
by Truth About It on Aug 7, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His ball-handling is also really overrated
His turnover percentage has been above 20% in both of his years.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Aug 7, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
his TO rate was 20% his first year, and down to 14% his second year… still not good, but an improvement… and that’s all you can ask for in a young player.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Aug 7, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
where this “good ball handling” comes from. McGuire never struck me as a good ball handler. I know it’s been said plenty, AND I know they used him a few times to brig the ball up. But I don’t think he’s a good ball handler. He tends to get into a standing fetal position when pressed, which is a sure sign of a guy not real confident in his ball-handling.
by CJHutch on Aug 7, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He is a very good passer, however
"a crab dribble is when you travel" - caron butler
by little stevie colter on Aug 7, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We're talking about a franchise
that played Rip and Larry Hughes at PG, Ben Wallace at SG and MJ at SF. Anything’s possible.
by Pryme on Aug 7, 2009 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t recall Hamilton at PG or Wallace at SG. Really?
by MR on Aug 7, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
tell me you mean SF
Which would still be crazy. But SG???? No way, I call Shenanigans! (either on you or on the team, foreverandever)
by sierradave on Aug 7, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Doug Collins tried Rip at PG because he wanted him and MJ on the court at the same time.
When Ben Wallace first got here, the team saw a 6’6" guy who was too short to play the front court, but someone who could play decent D. Thinking inside the box, they thought he could serve the team best as a guard. He also got to wear ’Sheed’s old jersey (as in, the exact same one, barely washed).
Of course this was all several coaches and GMs ago; the only constant has really been Abe.
by Pryme on Aug 7, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another spin on this question
I am wondering whether, under Flip, McGuire will be earning a spot due to being one of the 8 best players, or because Flip is covering for his stars’ defensive deficiencies.
Stevenson was the starting 2 guard in recent years, not because he was the best player, but because Eddie Jordan decided he needed a defender available to guard the best wing player so Caron Butler or Gilbert didn’t have to cover him. (Jordan did the same thing with Jared Jeffries.) When Stevenson went out of the lineup last season, McGuire started playing major minutes, even though he wasn’t playing much prior to Stevenson’s injury. Why did McGuire suddenly get all of those minutes? Because if he didn’t, Caron would have had to guard somebody.
Is that how it will work under Flip? Will tough defenders get substantial minutes just so Arenas, Butler and Jamison don’t have to do much heavy lifting on the defensive end? Or will Flip force the Big 3 to defend? When the Wizards play Cleveland, will Caron cover the other team’s SF (LeBron), or will Flip get someone else to do the dirty work?
by disgrunted on Aug 7, 2009 2:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's a false dichotomy
Tons, if not every good team starts a defensive specialist to cover for their big ofensive guns. Why do you think Courtney Lee, Mickael Pietrus, Dahntay Jones and even Trevor Ariza played heavy minutes.
I don’t want one of the Big Three guarding someones top scorer because it’ll take away from their offense. Their offense would be sacrificed and that’s what they do best. Play a specialist with them to maximize their strength.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Aug 7, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
more scoring?
But couldn’t an argument be made that by playing someone who is not an offensive black hole like Dom (and I’d argue Stevenson as well… I’m not sold on him being a sharpshooter compared to our other options) would lessen the offensive burden off the Big Three? I really feel like Caron/Gil/Antawn sometimes have the “offense is my job, defense is their job” mentality. Miller and Foye are better offensive fourth options than this version of the team has ever had, in my opinion (and that includes Young – he needs to show that he can do more than one on one).
Just throwing it out there.
by mfish on Aug 7, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree
You have bought fully into the Eddie Jordan mindset. I do agree that sometimes it makes sense to have your offensive stars guard lesser players for PORTIONS of games in order to avoid foul trouble. Please explain to me, though, any other ways that playing defense takes away from someone’s offense? In Eddie Jordan-land, playing defense takes away from one’s offense because Eddie wanted that player to play 40 minutes. Near impossible to play hard on both ends for 40 minutes. Can someone play hard on both ends for 34 minutes? Seems so.
Look at the Defensive Players of the Year for 2009: First team — Dwight Howard, Kobe, LeBron, Chris Paul and Garnett; Second team — Duncan, Wade, Rondo, Artest and Battier. Only the last three guys are known as defenders first. Do some of the guys on this list sometimes have a lesser player check the other team’s stars for portions of the game to avoid foul trouble? Sure. But they didn’t become All-NBA defenders by avoiding other teams’ stars completely, like Jamison, Butler and Arenas. They step up to check whoever needs to be checked to win.
My point is that I hope this “protect the stars on D” philosophy changes under Flip.
by disgrunted on Aug 7, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well Defensive First Team has never really been a fair measure of defense.Most of the time they just pick the most recognized players. Chris Paul is not a great defender for one.
by Fundefined on Aug 7, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t want one of the Big Three guarding someones top scorer because it’ll take away from their offense.
Not to mention the fact that they would be much more likely to get into foul trouble.
That’s the reason you don’t see good defenders like Kobe Bryant, LeBron James or Tim Duncan guarding anyone of substance until the 4th quarter….
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Aug 7, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
???
Dominic McGuire is not going to be in heavy rotation. End of story.
I wonder if some people liked seeing Taser start and also like seeing our team win 19 games in a full NBA season. I would prefer to see Taser in filler minutes.
by Unxpekted on Aug 7, 2009 4:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I love Taser but
Farmer didnt make the Lakers the champs because he came in and “rebounded” he did because he MADE SHOTS and played balanced basketball
Big Baby Davis didnt hold down KB’s spot by just playing D HE MADE SHOTS when it counted
Brooks didnt make a huge impact on Houston becuas he rebounded HE MADE SHOTS and assisted and did a good job spreading the floor with penetration
Mo Williams wasnt considered a great impact for Cleveland becuase he could rebound it was becuase HE MADE SHOTS
JR Smith didnt help his tema because he had good rebounding skills and could play a little D it was becuase he was balanced and at time HE MADE SHOTS
Im sorry but Taser does not make SHOTS and ultimately I just dont think if we want to win there is a place for him in rotation just my piece though.
by Unxpekted on Aug 7, 2009 5:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Brooks didnt make a huge impact on Houston
But Battier does make an impact – and not on the Offensive end of the floor…..
Mo Williams wasnt considered a great impact for Cleveland
Ben Wallace and Anderson Varejao were not on the floor for their Offense…..
JR Smith didnt
and Chris Anderson is not on the floor for Denver to “MAKE SHOTS”…..
The point is, every good team has an “intangibles” guy. The guy that takes on the tough defensive assignment. The guy that patrols the lane and blocks shots. The guy that comes in and gives energy and rebounding. The guy that sets up his teammates. But that guy doesn’t necessarily have to score the basketball to have an impact on the game.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Aug 7, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
1. Battier is by far a better defender and scorer. You really think Dom is Battier worthy? If so im lost.
2. Wallace didnt really help Cavs. Vera has more size than Dom and still did a decent job scoring in the paint.
3. The Birdman is the birdman lol.
In summary I dont think I need to explain why we dont desperately need Dom in rotation.
If he is I hope his minutes are minimal, and he provides his excellent rebounding combined wih improved ball handling and points in paint
by Unxpekted on Aug 7, 2009 5:54 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
McGuire is a good fit for THE WIZ top 8
You can throw McGuire into so many different Wizards lineups b/c he is so versatile. Assuming he doesn’t start he’ll be in lineups like..
C-Blatche
PF-Jamison
SF-McGuire
SG-Miller
PG-Arenas
Any lineup without Haywood is gonna need a good rebounding SF
C-Haywood
PF-McGuire
SF-Butler
SG-Foye
PG-Arenas
Any combination of scoring wings with McGuire being a good passer and not taking the shots. He’s gonna be played a good amount of minutes imo because he brings more to the table then Young and McGee right now. Young might be the better player overall because of his offense, but with the other weapons on the team someone has to defer. As long as the top 8 players doesn’t include Stevenson or Oberto I’m happy. Nothing against them, but we have to continue to develop the young guys while getting the wins.
by DaGribb on Aug 7, 2009 6:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You guys make it sound like McGuire is the next Michael Jordon, is just me or is anyone else unimpressed with McGuires game play, statistics and ability to play as a starter.
I mean come on now I think anyone with a brain can agree that this guy isnt/nor is going to be an All-Star anytime (long-very long-time) soon.
by Unxpekted on Aug 7, 2009 7:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
let's not make things up -
all-star? i missed where someone suggested that. jordan? i missed that too.
"a crab dribble is when you travel" - caron butler
by little stevie colter on Aug 7, 2009 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And at some point
you have to realize that you cannot have 5 high-usage, volume shooters on the floor at the same time….
With Arenas, Butler and Jamison – there are not very many shots left for the other two spots… Haywood is just about perfect (low-usage, high efficiency on Offense, and a Defensive anchor) …. and I think that either Stevenson (low usage, low turnovers, 3-point shooting, perimeter defense) or Dom McGuire (low usage, assists, rebounding, perimeter defense) would be the best option(s) at the SG spot. Let’s face it. Dom could go an entire game without taking a shot because Arenas, Butler and Jamison could take all of them; but he could still be effective with his passing, rebounding, defense, blocked shots and energy.
the other options are:
Nick Young is a high-usage, high volume shooter…. but he’s still learning how to play defense, doesn’t pass, and doesn’t rebound
Randy Foye is medium high-usage, can pass, but doesn’t rebound, and is undersized for a starting 2 guard.
Miller is medium high-usage, can pass, and can rebound but is not an especially good defender.
You can’t just put the 5 highest scorers on the floor at the same time….. That’s not the basis of a good “team” . I don’t see why McGuire couldn’t be the best option for the Starting 2-Guard – considering that the Starting 5 should be balanced between scoring, rebounding and defense
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Aug 7, 2009 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think this all goes back to Prada's original point.
Nick Young is extremely talented and still has a lot of room to go which is why you can’t bury him on the bench, even for a guy like Dominic Mcguire who is probably better for this team right now. Trade Nick, Stevenson or whatever and get a guy that can help you. We could have the greatest depth in the whole league and it wouldn’t help us (unless we have another setback with Arenas in which case our season is over anyway). Trade the assets you have so that you can improve your team.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk
by hibachi on Aug 8, 2009 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Charles Barkley said it best:
“If you go out with a girl and they say she has a great personality, she’s ugly. If they tell you a guy works hard, he can’t play a lick. Same thing.”
That said, we need a defender and rebounder to play next to all of our scorers, and even if McGuire’s not the perfect guy for us, someone similar to him is.
by pantslessyoda1 on Aug 9, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is my 8
Gil, Caron, Jamison, Haywood, Miller, Foye, Stevenson, Blatche. And we obviously will need someone else to fill minutes so when it comes down to it: Young vs. Mcguire, i choose Mcguire.
by qthaballa on Aug 7, 2009 9:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's Either DeShawn or Dom
If DeShawn gets his 18-22 minutes or so at SG, this will likely cut into Dom’s playing time as Mike Miller will likely see some of his time come at the SF position to compensate for DeShawn taking some of his minutes at SG. Essentially, an 18-20 minute rotation spot is up for grabs between one of the two, as both arguably have similar strenghts (perimeter defender) although their weaknesses are comparably different
DeShawn is definitely more of a proven commodity then Dom, as most of Dom’s meaningful NBA playing time was played on an admittedly disastorous 19-63 time. However, I feel if Dom is given the first chance among these two to carve out a rotation spot, it offers the team increased financial flexibility as it would possuibly allow Stevenson to be moved for reasons of cap flexibility. On the other hand, if Stevenson barely plays his trade value will likely plummet, as teams will likely think his injuries haven’t healed
Dom or DeShawn, who would you guys rather keep?
by kingofthebench on Aug 8, 2009 12:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dominic
Stevenson can hit the three and is a better ball handler, but Stevenson is a G and McGuire is a F. The Wizards can have McGuire guarding a SG, but if they need help running the offense he won’t be usual. I think if Stevenson gets minutes he’ll be stealing them from Miller or Foye…not McGuire.
by DaGribb on Aug 8, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I abhor the thought of Mcguire starting at SG
Using last year as a template can get you into alot of trouble. So many things have changed since then. When you start someone as offensively inefficient as Mcguire you give teams the choice to sag off of him and shade to one of our wing players that can actually score. I think this team must always have 5 players with the threat to score. That will keep the floor spread and give space for Gil to make plays. We all-ready tried the college forward at NBA SG. Needless to say he is crapping up a team to our north as we speak.
by ccrun1800 on Aug 8, 2009 9:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
said the same thing at realgm
but I’ll recap:
I’m not sure that [Dom will] be ruled out in Flip’s schemes this year. We have a ton of scorers, points at all positions to satisfy Flip’s offensive playbook. What we lack is the lead guy in his match-up zone. The Tayshuan Prince player who can be used to slowdown and neutralize whatever opposing player has the hot hand, the guy who can stall the attack and force the initial pass-off allowing the triangle to flatten.
This a key feature of Flip’s defense, having a guy equally competent and comfortable in man or zone, who can effectively blur the lines between the two with his length and athleticism. Recall Flip’s comment that 80% of that fat playbook he carries is actually defense, then ask who you plan to plug in to captain that D late in a game when stops are more important than scoring.
Consider also that Flip loves to run his guards past screens, etc. But which players on our squad are best suited to set a living wall? Haywood certainly, Oberto yes. But Jamison? Caron maybe. But not so much Mike Miller. McGee doesn’t set a narrow enough screen to be useful. A guy like Dom seems to have the aptitude to pick up these wrinkles quickly.
If I’m eyeballing it from here, when I’m guessing what player may lose minutes compared to year’s past I’d suspect that our Capitawn’s 40-per might be the likeliest target. Dray may siphon some, bumping Tawn to a few minutes at SF, but I suspect it’s not a forgone conclusion that Dom won’t find minutes in a defensive configuration. Remember the PF in Flip’s zone is responsible for guarding half the paint. I’d bet Jamison gets bumped to more minutes at SF with Dray in the frontcourt, provided Dray proves more consistently reliable. Fact is Jamison at PF really strains the defense, whereas Jamison at SF can be shaded and protected somewhat. Dom’s shortfall (offense) is a team strength at other positions, but what he does well (versatile inside-outside defense) is not replicated elsewhere. A smart coach will find a use for him.
also:
There’s a log-jam which ever way we slice it. I see Foye getting minutes behind a re-developing Gil, and Nick earning minutes by merit or not at all. I fully expect Miller will start the season at 2-guard, not terribly concerned about his minutes.
What I don’t see is 2 of the three keystone players who can run the Zone system. And, taking Kanye’s point, if you look at Flip’s track record he’s always found somebody who can fit that defensive system even if he has to bump a Szerbiak to the bench to do it.
Maybe I should bump the Coaching thread requesting line-ups that have the aptitude to run both the match-up Zone and the pick-and-screen heavy Hawk offense.
For best defense you need one long multipurpose perimeter defender, one intimidating paint presence, one positional rebounder who can hold their ground seal the paint underneath. If Both your frontcourt players have components of intimidation/rebounding you’re good. Right now who is the ‘point’ man in the zone? Who picks up the best perimeter guy at the top of the key? Who blocks out and disallows 2nd chance points (a major point of emphasis in Flip’s system).
If the Wiz are getting blown up by guys getting loose in the paint, and Jamison is continuing to collect rebounds only in open space, not sealing his man out, I suspect Flip may find a few minutes more inside for someone else. Maybe ask the FO to look around (Elton Brand swap?). Else he’ll only hope Blatche can step up. Or try Dom in late game defense situations. Jamison’s points seem more replaceable this year than ever in the past. May begin his elder years bench transition.
I’d if they swap Jams this year it might jeopardize Haywood’s re-sign. Maybe not. But if Jamison stays the rest of his contract, there’s no way he’ll stay in that starting role and still satisfy Flip. Not unless his game somehow becomes a little more physical on defense. Just a little. And offensively he doesn’t do enough of the rest of what Flip likes best. He’s unpredictable, both good and bad.
Still, if Dom plays somewhat less this year and it drives down his re-sign price, dandy. Maybe then we keep him as a low-cost roleplayer on a discount, while he develops a useful role. Never hurts to have on your bench a role-playing defense/hustle guy who doesn’t need points to play well. Especially if they’re still young enough to improve.
by doclinkin on Aug 8, 2009 9:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
BUt the part of the argument that you miss Mike
is the Mark Madsen position…
We are two deep at Power Forward. But those two are a weak defender who does not challenge the ball and who rebounds in open space rather than bodying his man to seal the paint/baseline; and a foul prone footslow big with an indifferent record of consistency. A guy who gets frustrated a little easily and checks himself out of the game by giving himself the excuse of foul trouble when he’s not doing well.
The match-up zone defense needs three players:
1. a ballhawking long player who can challenge the opponents best perimeter attacker, stall the point of attack to disallow penetration and prevent interior passes.
2. an intimidating interior presence who can force penetration to pull up rather than attack the hoop.
3. a weakside rebounder who can play solid no-mistake positional defense and react quickly to seal the paint against a backside pass etc. A hustle guy who can hold his own with the banging and bodying scrum if the opponent misses, so that even if his team misses the rebound check he’s still in the right spot to prevent an easy interior score on the offensive rebound.
Candidates on this squad for each of those positions are:
1. DeShawn, Dom, and possibly a defensively minded Gilbert who (if not long) has occasionally shown ability as a defensive pestilence challenging the point of attack. Maybe a slimmed-down Caron (reports suggest he has leaned up again this summer).
2. Brendan Haywood, Dray Blatche, JaVale McGee. Here we’re stocked with long guys who like to track the ball and challenge a shot. McGee will occasionally block a perimeter shot when he started with one foot inside the paint. And on the other end all can serve as that big pick and roll threat. Brendan sets the best pick on the squad; Dray and McGee have great hands for the catch and finish on the ‘roll’ down the lane, even if McGee sets too wide a base on his pick.
3. Jamison? No. He rebounds in open space, tracks trajectory and anticipates well, collects every un-contested board and a few more, but does not first put his ass on a guy and move him out of the space. In fact in this zone scheme the safest place to stow Jamison on defense is as a perimeter wing SF on the baseline, where if he’s beat he’s got Bigs behind him and a defender shading the short triangle next to him.
Dray can suit this need, though he’s vulnerable to fouls. Oberto was picked up precisely to play this position, to exemplify it in practice and teach the young Bigs.
But as far as all purpose hustlef@#k, only Dom McGuire fits both the Mark Madsen energy-guy position and the ‘Hassell-Prince’ hassling king spot.
I expect given his work ethic the staff will find a use for him once it’s seen what he can do in practice and training camp.
by doclinkin on Aug 8, 2009 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Track down breakdowns of Flip's defensive principles
And you’ll notice that offensive rebounding is a key bugaboo. Ditto easy interior scoring. (I don’t have my links to hand on this computer..).
I fully suspect we’ll see more than a couple minutes of a Blatche/Haywood frontline and possibly even experiment with Haywood/McGee, or Haywood/Oberto depending on injuries etc. But this bumps Jamison to SF, backing up Caron, cutting minutes for Miller except at the 2-spot. A tight squeeze at a position of greatest depth (perimeter wing scorer: including various 2-guards as well).
(or possibly leaves AJ vulnerable to a midseason/next year swap (Elton Brand? if the chemistry isn’t working in Philly again?).
Still, these sorts of line-up shuffles are a nice problem to have. I expect we’ll see a loose and deep rotation for the first half of the year while Flip tries out chemistry combinations that work at both ends. Satisfying both part of that fat playbook, offense defense 20/80.
by doclinkin on Aug 8, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















