What about Pops Mensah-Bonsu?
Pops Mensah-Bonsu is no stranger to playing basketball in the District. Those of you that follow college hoops remember him from his days at George Washington where he terrorized rims and opponents with his earth-shaking dunks. After his time at Foggy Bottom, he spent one year in Dallas before playing a couple seasons overseas.
Last season, he came back to the NBA after signing a 10 day contract with the Spurs. San Antonio didn't bring him back for a second 10 day contract, but he quickly found a home in Toronto where he stayed the rest of the season. After joining the Raps, he provided a big spark defensively for Toronto. Over the last 19 games of the season in which Mensah-Bonsu played, the Raptors were 7.1 points per 100 possessions better with Mensah-Bonsu on the court. Sure those numbers are probably slightly inflated by a small sample size, but it's evident that he does have some defensive impact when he's out on the floor.
Last week, the Raptors made a qualiftying offer for Mensah-Bonsu before free agency started which gives them the chance to match any offer sheet that he signs. Of course, Toronto extended the QO to Mensah-Bonsu before signing Hedo Turkoglu to a 5 year, $53 millon contract on Friday. With Hedo and his large contract in the fold, Mensah-Bonsu may not figure as prominently into Toronto's plans as he did just a week ago.
So would he be worth the risk? Let's take a look at some of the pros and cons of bringing in King Whale Killer.
Pros
- Defense: Like I mentioned earlier, Toronto was 7.1 points per 100 possessions better with Mensah-Bonsu on the court. In the short time that Mensah-Bonsu was with the Spurs, the defense was also better with him on the court. Sure, some larger sample sizes would be nice to rein in those +/- numbers a little bit, but it's large enough to show that he makes an impact defensively when he's on the court. His biggest contribution defensively comes through rebounding. Last season, he had total rebounding percentage of 23%, 6.9% higher than anyone on the Wizards last season (7.9% higher if you don't count Oleksiy Pecherov).
- Pyrotechnics: Sure, JaVale McGee already does a fine job in this area but you can never have too many highlight plays, right?
- Affordability: If the Wizards are truly looking for someone who can "occasionally and give us six to eight minutes" off the bench at a price fitting of that role, Pops might be one of the best values available on the market. He's still young and you would have to assume that he wouldn't get more than the bi-annual exemption from anyone this summer.
Cons
- Offense: The good news is that Pops knows his limitations and doesn't take outside shots that would lower his shooting percentages. The bad news is that he's still not great at getting the ball in the hoop when he's close either. He had 37% of his close shots blocked last year and 19% of all of his inside shots. So it shouldn't shock you that he had a 35.4 FG% with the Raptors last season.
- Defense on centers: He's got enough size to guard centers in a pinch, but as the numbers show, it's probably best that he doesn't guard them anymore than that. Opposing centers had a PER of 31.8 against Pops last season. To give you an idea of how glaring that is, last year Dwight Howard had a PER of 25.5. His overall defensive numbers were still good, but that's because the Raptors were wise not to put him at the 5 spot too much last season.
Mensah-Bonsu might not fix all the problems that some other free agents that we've talked about might be able to, but he'd help fill some of the team's holes without breaking the bank. At this point, that's probably about as good as we can ask for whoever gets signed by Washington this off-season.
0 recs |
45 comments
|
Comments
I like it
as I’ve said before, I think we should sign 2 bigs. If we got him at a reasonable price, he could be a solid contributor. Maybe like Aaron WIlliams was for New Jersey when they got him away form us.
by CJHutch on Jul 8, 2009 8:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No
b/c he hasnt proved anything yet. I would rather get a veteran big man like rasho, or collins
by MitchieMit on Jul 8, 2009 9:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great idea, Jake
I’d much rather have him than some of the vet bigs we might get.
You’ve been killing it with ideas recently. First Rasho, now this. Get them both.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 8, 2009 9:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Like him, but...
I really want a back up center (read 7ft at least 250) not a PF. I want to make sure that we are not tempted to go small unless Flip thinks he has a real match-up advantage. No more Songailas at center. Also true centers are a rarer commodity than PFs.
As far as signing 2 goes. I’m for it to an extent, but there are only so many minutes. We can addresssome roster issues later on with 10 day signings or trades.
by NeverNervousPervis on Jul 8, 2009 9:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not concerned about the difference between a 4 and a 5
Because as Jake noted, Pops can guard centers and he’s an outstanding rebounder and defender. I’d rather have someone who has the game of a “center” than the height of a “center.”
Pops is different from Songaila because Pops actually rebounds and doesn’t score outside of the paint.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 8, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but
Jake said defending centers was a problem, they ate him up. I consider this spot a 3rd big/6 fouls/stand in the way of Shaq/Howard kind of guy. Pops doesn’t fit that plangenda. he is essentially a younger Ruffin. there are worse things to be as a 13th or 14 guy on the roster i guess.
Compare him to another low rung guy like Collins, at least Collins has the bulk to defend real bigs. thats whats missing in the reserve 4/5 area.
by Jheiser3 on Jul 8, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
Misread Jake’s line. Dumb-dumb-dumb on my part.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 8, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So much talk about not enough minutes . . .
in these FA and trade threads.
Besides insurance against injury, it it not helpful to have talented bigs to practice against? There is never any mention of this, Is practice that unimportant in the NBA?
shine like bald head, smoke trees call me log head
by ThaCaronic on Jul 8, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we are
if we aren’t going for a big to defend with his chest than I’d just as soon add a multi-spot forward who can shoot some. News toady is that Jason Barnes won’t be back in PHX.
by Jheiser3 on Jul 8, 2009 10:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Matt Barnes you mean?
he’s a nice 8-9th guy, but don’t think he’s what the wiz need. pops is cheaper and bigger.
"a crab dribble is when you travel" - caron butler
by little stevie colter on Jul 8, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree...
Matt Barnes is going to help someone, but he is not what the Wizards need…
CJHutch… I like the Aaron Williams analogy… he was a pretty useful player for years.
The Rasho – Pops combo could work for me, but I think we need to see what Heytvelt does in Vegas.
by khrabb on Jul 8, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
point was
that Pops brings nothing new. he can’t defend centers any more than Blatche or McGee can. So if defending centers isn’t a priority than go get the best multi-use forward available. MATT Barnes fits that, and he is used to defending bigger players.
They can still sign a big 3rd C with beef for the minimum.
its the difference between playoff depth and paper depth chart depth.
by Jheiser3 on Jul 8, 2009 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In Michael Lee’s Wizards Insider post last night he suggests the team is looking to add a forward at the biannual exemption. To me that could mean a couple things:
1. Grunfeld believes the talent available for cheap at the PF position is better than at the C position.
2. The Wizards are happier with their depth at C (Blatche, McGee) than at PF (Blatche, McGee & McGuire perhaps).
A good rebounding, defense-minded PF could be of use to the Wizards.
Also, there’s absolutely no way the Wizards add more than one FA this offseason.
by Johnnie Futbol on Jul 8, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pops rebounds
That’s something new.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 8, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So...
instead of a multi-use player or a player that can defend opposing centers as more than a speed bump, we choose Pops as a rebounding specialist?
can’t we find a rebounder at any time from the D League?
by Jheiser3 on Jul 8, 2009 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pops will cost the same amount as a D-league guy
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 8, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
guess
Guess i don’t understand the point of locking up a player that has one defined ability that can be replicated by lots of other players that will be available throughout the season for the same cost, or less if during the season.
I read a lot from you about allocation of resources. This doesn’t seem to make sense in that regard. Why guarantee someone money and guarantee more lux tax payments for what he brings? And do that instead of a player that can defend opposing Centers… seems like a terrible return on the investment and way overpaying for the production.
by Jheiser3 on Jul 8, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because Pops would not be "locked up"
The assumption is he’s good for a one-year contract for the minimum, which is essentially what a D-League player would get anyway.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 8, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess I'm saying
That I’d rather have Pops than Channing Frye, Mikki Moore, Adonal Foyle or Jason Collins.
Rasho? Rather have Rasho. But in thinking about Ernie’s FA strategy (basically “sign here for one year and try again next year, guys.”), it’d make sense to bring in a young, hungry guy like Pops (essentially a D-League guy) too.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 8, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
rasho might not want a a one year deal for the min this late in his career. if thats true it makes since to bring in pop, a guy looking to prove he can play in the league
by wizchamp on Jul 8, 2009 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rasho apparently going back north to Toronto...
Pops is looking better n better…
by khrabb on Jul 11, 2009 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
everyone would rather us go after a stud post defender. But the reality is the team has shown it doesn’t want to spend the money on a big name. Maybe that’s justified, maybe not. Different argument. But the point of this Post, and the others like it, is to figure out someone we could get on the cheap that could possibly come in and help with some of our deficiencies. Like Mike said, I would rather take a flyer on a guy who may still have some untapped potential than go to a known-ceiling retread like Mikki Moore.
by CJHutch on Jul 8, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting idea
Mensah-Bonsu gave the Raptors a lot of energy at the end of last season, and as people have mentioned, he’s a great rebounder and a decent shot-blocker. His offense is pretty much limited to dunks, though. I saw him play a game in Austin, and he also didn’t do a great job of getting out on shooters and didn’t box out much, which could be part of his problems against NBA centers. Still, I think it’s worth considering, and I definitely think the Wizards would be better off with him than, say, a Collins brother.
Now writing for Ridiculous Upside, now with more draft coverage.
by Jon L on Jul 8, 2009 12:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He's no stiff...
But he’s yet another skinny post player. I like him, but not if he’s the ONLY other post player we sign. Pops + Rasho, love it. Pops alone, no way – I want a big body that clears more space and holds position.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jul 8, 2009 12:55 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
We already have three lanky power forwards that cannot guard centers. I want a guy that can body up Shaquille O’Neal, not a guy who makes every center look like Shaq in his prime.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 8, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t call him a lanky power forward. Not from looking at that youtube video at least.
He wouldn’t be big enough to play Howard or Shaq (let’s let Haywood do that anyways!), but he would add some muscle at the 4 spot.
by Johnnie Futbol on Jul 8, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh I Wish!
He wouldn’t be big enough to play Howard or Shaq (let’s let Haywood do that anyways!)
I tell you what. Talk to Haywood, or go to his blog and write to him. Tell him to just play 48 minutes every game, and we won’t have a problem. Until he does that, though, we will need someone, anyone, that can guard other centers for the 20 minutes a game he sits on the bench. Blatche can’t. Jamison can’t. McGee can’t. Pops Mensah-Bonsu can’t.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 8, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would rather just develop
the skinny post players we all ready have as was mentioned above. He seems to be a young, inexperienced, energy guy something this Wizards teams has in spades. I think the FO is looking for an experienced back-up. Someone more wily in the ways of the jersey tug and the cheap shot to the gut.
by ccrun1800 on Jul 8, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we need a back up center. we have at least 4 people who can play the 4 spot and one true center.
by les boulez bomber on Jul 8, 2009 2:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe instead of
looking at what’s out there we should coax Mutombo out of retirement. Or Alonzo. Or Keven Willis. Or Big Gheorge. Or Patrick Chewing. Or Dream. Or……
by CJHutch on Jul 8, 2009 6:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll take Zo
Right now. Homecoming for a great Hoya. Running is not required. Just foul Shaq, LeBron, and Dwight five times in each matchup, and be a cheerleader and coach for the rest of the season. How much does that cost for a guy to play about a dozen games? I think he might give us a hometown discount for six games. We can tell him Sam Cassell will log at least 5 minutes in each playoff game along with him.
by Unselds on Jul 8, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
one answer
peter john ramos give him another shot. but maybe theyll actually play him. another solution chris wilcox hes a local vet. and better than haywood mcgee songaila and blatche. it would be interesting to c him in a wiz uniform
by gwall24 on Jul 9, 2009 12:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Chris Wilcox > Brendan Haywood?
…chris wilcox hes a local vet. and better than haywood…
Was that a typo?
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 9, 2009 8:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Please
I’d rather have Heytvelt than Chris Wilcox….
Wilcox is a PF – the Wizards need a Center. Wilcox is a poor defender.. The Wizards need a good defender (or at least a good rebounder). He has no post up moves, cannot get to the FT line, doesn’t rebound especially well, and he can’t shoot. About the only thing Wilcox does well is dunk. Add in the fact that, as a 7-year veteran he would cost $1,107,572
Heytvelt is a PF/C – 6’11" 270 – and before his foot surgeries, he was very athletic. Good defensive rebounder. Excellent shooter. Very good in the Pick-n-Roll and Pick-n-Pop game. AND he can also dunk as well. Add in the fact, that as an undrafted rookie, he would only cost $457,588 (about 1/3 of Wilcox)
I’d actually prefer Rasho Nesterovic (Center, 7’0" 255) if he’s not too expensive… or, if Rasho is too expensive, Adonal Foyle (Center, 6’10", 270).
but if the Wizards go cheap, look for Heytvelt as an option.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jul 9, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope so
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 9, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do
you all think of Mike Sweetney? I just read where he is trying to make a come back with the Celtics summer league team. I know he has had serious weight issues, but if he could get that under control he may be a decent pick up. I don’t think he ever realized his full potential in the NBA because of his weight. But he was an excellent rebounder in college and had some of the softest hands out there. I always thought of him as a poor man’s Elton Brand.
by CJHutch on Jul 9, 2009 3:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I always thought of him as a poor man’s Elton Brand.
Nobody is that poor.
by MR on Jul 9, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
does that
mean you’re not a fan?
I will always like Sweentey, whether he plays again or not. I spent plenty of games court level at Verizon center watching him play. His hands are every bit as soft as Chris Webber’s (though, admittedly not as soft as his mid-section), and he was very crafty under the basket. What can I say, I’m a sucker for good footwork.
by CJHutch on Jul 9, 2009 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like him too
Maybe he can help get us into the elite eight or the final four.
As a pro, I think I’ll take Wilcox.
by MR on Jul 9, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey
that was good. I chuckled there for a minute.
You’re right though, WIlcox is a better option. So is Rasho. Or Oberto. Or Pops. Maybe even Foyle, for our needs at least. I wasn’t necessarily saying take Sweetney over one of these guys. I kind of meant as roster filler. Like if we were to find a way to trade Deshawn and/or James for cash. Something like that. Sorry, I should’ve elaborated.
by CJHutch on Jul 9, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If that were the case
I’d still rather have a rookie with a glimmer of upside (whose minimum salary would be cheaper). Tell you what, let’s sign Sweets to a front office job. Dir of Player Development?
by MR on Jul 9, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what's he gonna do
show them all the Dunkin Donuts in the DC area?
Again, I’m just throwing out names. It looks like we’ll be scraping the bottom of the barrel, so I’m seeing who’s stuck in the cracks down there.
by CJHutch on Jul 9, 2009 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
alright ive solved the problem
dave neal is our solution lol jk. we are literally one BIG man (thats is a physical force) away from being able to make the finals. don’t missunderstand i said being able to not saying we absolutely would make it.
by gwall24 on Jul 9, 2009 7:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














