Ernie Grunfeld likes his roster and loves its "versatility"
You'd never know it, since he always stands among other basketball players, but Ernie Grunfeld is a pretty towering figure. Of course, this shouldn't be that surprising, since he carved out a pretty solid NBA career, but the height is pretty striking when you are a sub-6' foot blogger standing next to him. Regardless, I caught up with Ernie outside the Cox Pavilion earlier today. We talked about his thoughts on the team's frontcourt, the Mike Miller/Randy Foye trade, the Wizards' situation with the luxury tax and his thoughts on how the moves by other Eastern Conference teams affects what the Wizards do.
He also asked a bit about the site, though I didn't catch that part on tape. He asked me how many commenters we have, how many hits the site gets and what type of fan it attracts (I told him several hundred, a couple thousand and dieharts, in that order).
Full interview below the jump:
Mike Prada: There are a lot of minutes available in the frontcourt. What do you think JaVale McGee and Andray Blatche need to do to earn those minutes?
Ernie Grunfeld: Well, they have to be consistent and learn the system, which they’re doing a good job of now. The main thing we’re looking for is consistency and improvement.
MP: There are a lot of minutes up there because of the trade you just made for Mike Miller and Randy Foye. Why did you decide to take that trade? How would you justify it? What do you think Mike and Randy add to the team?
EG: You mean I have to justify it (laughs)? They’re two outstanding perimeter shooters, and they can both play the two position or the three position. They really help us with our perimeter game, which we struggled with last year. Randy [Foye] is also very young; he’s only 25 and he’s already proven what he can do in this league. Of course, Mike [Miller] has been a very consistent player [that was] Rookie of the Year, averaged double figures and one of the best three-point shooters to ever play the game. We got a lot of experience, a lot of versatility and a lot of high-tech shooting that we missed last year.
MP: There are a lot of guards on the roster and not a lot of big men. What might be in the works to maybe add another big man?
EG: Well, last year we had a lot of big men and not too many guards. There were a lot of big men sitting on the bench, which seems a little bit unlucky (couldn’t make out the word). We’re only going to play eight or nine guys anyway. With Brendan [Haywood] Andray [Blatche], JaVale [McGee], [Dominic] McGuire and Antawn [Jamison], there are five bigs.
MP: I noticed you mentioned McGuire. Is he going to play some power forward? Is that something you had in mind?
EG: Absolutely.
MP: What about Mike Miller [at power forward]?
EG: Depends on what combinations we go with. One of the things we really like is that we’re really versatile. We can really stretch the defense, and if you have to double team anyone on our team, we have outstanding shooting on the floor. You know, if something comes up [where we can add depth], that’s something we’ll look at, if it can give us a little more experience and a little more depth, but we feel really good about what we have. You know, the players we gave up, except for Darius, didn’t really play for us.
MP: Now, the Wizards are already a little bit over the luxury tax. How much does that play into the team’s decision-making?
EG: It certainly plays a role. You know, there are 13 or 14 teams this year that are paying the luxury tax. It’s something you always have to deal with [and] be responsible about.
MP: How does the luxury tax affect future moves that might be made? Is there a move that maybe can’t be made because you’re already over the luxury tax?
EG: I mean, once you’re over the cap, not just the luxury tax, you’re really trading dollar for dollar, so there’s really not an affect on trade possibilities because there’s really just changing money once you’re over the cap, not just the tax.
MP: There are a lot of guys on the Wizards whose contracts are expiring next year. How might that play into decisions down the road?
EG: The players always tell us what we should do by their actions. We’ll see how everybody plays, how everybody comes together and who fits into the puzzle that we’re putting together. The players really tell you that by their performance. (there was more but I couldn’t hear it).
MP: You see a lot of the moves that the other teams have made, like Boston, Orlando and Cleveland. How does that play into your decision-making?
EG: We’re just trying to care of our own business and let [other teams] take care of their business. They made some moves, but we also made some moves. We were the first to make a move, so everybody’s following us (chuckles).
MP: But knowing what they’ve been doing…
EG: What have they been doing?
MP: Well, the trade for Vince Carter, Rasheed Wallace … Does that make you want to make another move?
EG: No. If you look around, Orlando traded for Vince Carter, but they lost [Hedo] Turkoglu, you know what I’m saying? [Something unintelligible]. We’re going to do what’s in our best interests, and everybody does what they feel is in their best interests. Orlando went out and got Vince Carter, but they didn’t re-sign Turkoglu. How that whole team comes together remains to be seen, but we’re not going to react to everybody else, we’re just going to look at our own situation. We really feel that we really have that talent this year.
(He then asked me how I felt about the team. I kind of dodged the question).
We then exchanged some small talk, at which point he went back to talking about the roster as it stands.
He talked about how he feels the team is at least three deep at every position.
"At the 1, we have Gilbert [Arenas], Randy [Foye], Javaris [Crittenton] and Mike James. At the two, we have DeShawn [Stevenson], Nick Young, Mike [Miller] and Randy [Foye]. At the 3, we have Caron, Mike can play there, McGuire can play there, Antawn. At the 4, we have Antawn, McGuire and Blatche. At the 5, we have Haywood, McGee and Blatche. You want to make sure you have at least two players per position, and we have three. You want to be sure you have at least one backup, and we have three because of injuries, so it’ll be interesting."
I asked him about how minutes might be divided, to which he responded "The players will determine who plays what."
Ernie definitely came across as a much more approachable person than I expected. Surely, Summer League played a role, and he did definitely say a little in many words, but I expected him to be more stand-offish. There were some times where he seemed to not like some of my questions, but after a quick ribbing of me, he answered them comprehensively, at least in length. I think there’s a lot hiding between the lines of this interview. It doesn’t seem like we’re going to see much more player movement, and it seems like it might take time for the minutes to sort themselves out.
0 recs |
32 comments
|
Comments
Nice interview
I think you got more out of Ernie than any other interview I’ve read. I guess a general manager can’t ever give his honest opinion about players or other teams. And Ernie rarely says anything of substance in the interviews I’ve seen or read. So good job!
by hotplate on Jul 15, 2009 10:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I forgot about those
I kind of just saw him and went up to him without prepping much.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 15, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome interview
You got a ton of info/opinion from him. Thanks.
by BayAreaBullet on Jul 16, 2009 4:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
2 things stand out to me
The first, and most relevant, is that he did NOT mention JaVale as an option at the 4. That’s a big positive to me (though I know a lot of posters here think he should play the 4), because his game is the low post, not the high post. He needs to learn how to play center and stick with it. Second, and probably not significant at all (I hope), is that he mentioned Stevenson’s name first at SG. I’m hoping that the competition for that position is wide open— between Miller, Foye and Young that is.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jul 15, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I got the same thing out of Stevenson being first on the list
I hope that the competition there should be wide open. Honestly I can’t see how Miller isn’t the front runner for that spot. Great job Mike, getting EG is a big get.
by Kuruption on Jul 15, 2009 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes
the Stevenson thing really jumped out to me. I hope he doesn’t feel some sort of loyalty to Stevenson. Also, did I read it right? Did he say Mike James could play the 3? Or did you mean to type Nick?
by CJHutch on Jul 16, 2009 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course he mentions Stevenson
What would be the point of insulting one of the players on your roster, whatever your actual plans are?
by MR on Jul 16, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
my point is
that he mentioned him FIRST.
I realize it probably means nothing, but it’s something that just stuck out to me.
by CJHutch on Jul 16, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Would Hope
That Stevenson is at least given the opportunity to compete for the backup SG spot. I think he deserves that and can do that well, if he can return to the form he had 2-3 seasons ago. That said, the only person I think he might beat out on the depth chart is Nick Young.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 16, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would Hope
he DOESN’T beat out Nick Young. If Young can’t get by Stevenson this year than he needs to go.
by CJHutch on Jul 16, 2009 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
great job mike. and kudos for even getting him to speak to you. there is only so much a gm can or will say. playing his hand in the open leaves less room to maneuver. if you get a chance, maybe a question along these lines: when looking to put a team together, does he target the best players he can get under the cap with the intention to let flip sort out the roles and combinations, or does he work more closely with flip and target the best players for his system?
everyone knows he needs another big guy. he probably does not want to seem desperate.
by les boulez bomber on Jul 15, 2009 11:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Goob job!
Good interview – probably was a fairly scary thing to do :P.
Would have loved to see EG’s reaction to a question about selling the pick instead of taking Blair and what went into the decision.
IMO that would have netted you the cojones of the off-season award.
Also curious how he would have reacted to a question about the Oberto rumors and our apparent interest in signing a big right after he talks about our depth at all 5 positions.
by Manimal Smith on Jul 15, 2009 11:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I got two more days to ask those questions
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 15, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you get the sense that
it would alienate EG if you asked him such pointed/difficult questions and thereby not be a good thing for the site?
He is a master at not answering so its obviously not worth a risk to the site’s success and relationship with the team’s GM if those kind of questions would make him look unfavorably upon you.
by Manimal Smith on Jul 16, 2009 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, I mean, it was the first time I've ever talked to him
So I kept it general and tried not to ruffle too many feathers, but later in the week, when I feel more comfortable with him, I might ask.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 16, 2009 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, nice interview
But Foye at the three? Can I say “no” right now?
Now writing for Ridiculous Upside, now with more draft coverage.
by Jon L on Jul 16, 2009 1:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That part of the tape was fuzzy
So he might have said something different.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 16, 2009 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that doesn't sound like a good idea
by Matt K. on Jul 16, 2009 5:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably meant that...
Foye and Miller between them can provide meaningful minutes at 1 2 and 3… Foye at 1-2, Miller at 2-3.
Fine interview Mike… and yes one forgets that Ernie is 6’5" because he is generally surrounded by other tall men!
As an older guy who saw Ernie play in college (I lived in Nashville at that time and therefore watched many SEC games) as well as in the pros. The Ernie-Bernie King Tennessee Vols were one of the first SEC teams to seriously threaten UK’s perennial dominance. Vandy had a pretty good team at that time also (Jan van Breda Kolff was the name that some will remember)… but Tennesse State (Truck Robinson) put the fear of God into them in a non-conference game in 1972.
by khrabb on Jul 16, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see where he says foye at the 3
“At the 3, we have Caron, Mike can play there, McGuire can play there, Antawn”
…..yea foye at the three is not the best thing
by the way this is my first post on here!!! I have read this blog everyday for the past couple of years, and I dont know why I never posted anything.
by SkinsWizStangs on Jul 16, 2009 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome to the Site
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 16, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When Prada asks "What do you think Mike and Randy add to the team?"
he answers “They’re two outstanding perimeter shooters, and they can both play the two position or the three position.”
Now, he doesn’t mention Foye later on when he mentions guys who can play the three, so it’s possible he misspoke in the first instance, but I’m wary.
Now writing for Ridiculous Upside, now with more draft coverage.
by Jon L on Jul 16, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Solid interview
That’s also pretty cool that he asked about the site.
by Matt K. on Jul 16, 2009 5:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That was my reaction too
And when Mike said “hundreds of commenters” I kind of got a proud “they’re talking about me!” feeling.
by hotplate on Jul 16, 2009 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kudos
Nice work, Mike. Pretty cool gig you’ve made for yourself.
As a guy who worked in sports journalism for a decade and has hired a bunch of people since then for other positions, I have to say the body of work you’re building ought to be pretty impressive to potential employers.
"Now, obviously individual production does not unilaterally equal better team production, but there's a high level of causation."
by Vanilla Gorilla on Jul 16, 2009 9:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good interview . . .
and I know the GM has to have rose-colored glasses, but I hope that his not his operating philosophy now or at the trade deadline.
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jul 16, 2009 11:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great work Mike
Of course I’m curious as to how you kinda dodged his question about what you thought about the team.
Also … This is my first mobile comment since SB Nation recently launched the ability to do so … Seems to work well.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It.net and Bullets Forever.
by Truth About It on Jul 16, 2009 9:10 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
I Was Wondering That Too
Of course I’m curious as to how you kinda dodged his question about what you thought about the team.
My guess is he didn’t want to tell Ernie that he thought that the trade for Mike Miller and Randy Foye were pretty weak compared to what the other teams have been doing this offseason, that he regrets not being able to draft Ricky Rubio, and that he regrets not drafting DeJuan Blair. If he told Ernie how he really felt about the current state of the team Ernie might not let Prada interview him again.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 17, 2009 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I honestly don't even remember
I remember telling him that I was trying to represent the pulse of many fans when asking these questions. Otherwise, I don’t remember how I answered.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 17, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















