Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

David Lee to the Wiz


This is the best scenario I've heard thus far. If we could dump any one of the combo of Thomas/Songalia/Stevenson/James/Pech, maybe throw in Blatche, and then swap picks for Lee that would be a winner for us. I think Lee could give us what everyone saw Chris Anderson give the Nuggets in the playoffs, minus the baggage. (thought I wouldn't mind seeing us sign Anderson, since he's a FA. I know that would mean dumping players and contracts though). Lee is a guy who will do the dirty work that none of our guys want to do, not to mention his ability to get points without getting plays called for him. A player on the cusp of all star status who doesn't care about the glamor? I'd take him in an instant. Then we could still land a DeRozan or Henderson with the Knicks' pick.

This represents the view of the user who wrote the FanPost, and not the entire Bullets Forever community. We're a place of many opinions, not just one.

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Lee's difficult to trade for because he's a free agent

And he’s due for a big pay raise, which means he’s a base-year compensation player. His salary for trade purposes is only half of what he actually signs for.

Here’s an explanation from Celtics Blog (they use Leon Powe as an example, but sub in Lee and it still applies).

Essentially, what this means is that for purposes of trades, you only count 50% of the player’s actual salary as outgoing salary for trade purposes. However, the team trading for the BYC player has to count 100% of his actual salary for incoming purposes.

I know that’s confusing as heck, so let me use an example. Let’s say we want to trade Leon for a player making $7 million. We thus intend to sign Leon to a one-year, $7 million contract. Here’s how that breaks down under BYC rules:

Boston trades: Leon Powe ($7 million salary * 50% reduction = $3.5 million)
Boston receives: $7 million player

The trade cannot go through, because the $3.5 million and $7.0 million salaries don’t “match” within 125% + $100k.

Couldn’t we just sign Leon to a $14 million expiring contract to complete the trade, then? No. Here’s why not:

Boston trades: Leon ($14 million salary * 50% reduction = $7.0 million)
Boston receives: $7 million player

So far so good, right? However, the next step kills it:

Team X trades: $7 million player
Team X receives: Leon Powe ($14 million salary, with no reduction)

Thus, once again, the salaries don’t “match”. Base year compensation makes it very difficult (although not impossible) for players to be traded in the first year of contracts where they saw a substantial raise.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Jun 7, 2009 12:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Is this what happens in a sign-and-trade?

I thought those deals were done to get around things like this?

"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck

by George Templeton on Jun 7, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's because Lee is a restricted free agent

It doesn’t happen in all sign-and-trades, only ones involving restricted free agents that are due a major pay raise.

The only time I can remember a RFA that was sign-and-traded was Joe Johnson to Atlanta in 2005. That scenario worked because Atlanta was significantly under the cap, meaning they could match salary.

Truth is, there aren’t all that many sign-and-trades done, period, in the NBA. The major reason is because of the base-year compensation issues.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Jun 7, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

The last sentence of the second paragraph should read

“That scenario worked because Atlanta was significantly under the cap, meaning they didn’t have to match salary.”

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Jun 7, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even if we got him, what would we do with him?

Do we really want to pay someone eight or ten million dollars to come off the bench behind Antawn Jamison?

by pantslessyoda1 on Jun 7, 2009 12:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Does a backup make us a championship contender?

Things would have been so much more simple if we had just won Blake Griffin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk

by hibachi on Jun 8, 2009 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

I think that if we’re going to compete for a title, we not only need to bring in a better shooting guard, but we need to upgrade one of the big three, which is a large part of what I like so much of working out a trade of Jamison for Stoudemire. Lee’s a good player, but he’s not that much better than Jamison, and it’d be a waste for us to have two good power forwards and no good shooting guard.

by pantslessyoda1 on Jun 8, 2009 2:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

How about

Mike James + Songaila + Pech to Orlando for God. He led JJ’s Magic to the NBA Finals, so if we bring him in and pair him with Gilbert, we could make a serious title run.

by morethesamewiz on Jun 8, 2009 3:40 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

What's God's salary?

I think we’d have to give up a pick as well.

by sierradave on Jun 8, 2009 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess I

didn’t realize the specifics of a sign and trade. I just saw that the Knicks were shopping him because they wanted to get further under the cap next year. As far as the Lee and Jamison comparison, they are two completely different players. While Jamison gives you more scoring, and he does get rebounds, he is not a true PF. We need someone who will camp out around the basket. As much as Haywood has improved, he will never be more than an average player. Meaning we need a PF who will stay inside full time, rather than drift to the perimeter and lead the team in 3 pt attempts. That’s on offense. On defense, we need someone who can guard a Bosh, Duncan, Stoudemire, or Brand type. A banger. So yes, I would gladly take Lee over Jamison, especially given the age disparity.
  To expand on this, I would NOT take Jordan Hill. The last thing we need is another front court player who “needs to put on weight.”

by CJHutch on Jun 8, 2009 9:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Grit needed

Lee would add something lacking on the interior on the wiz, an instinctive garbage player. Blatche, JaVale, think offense first.

by G-Man11 on Jun 8, 2009 12:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Grit

I agree in what he brings, just not that its a worthwhile number. Grit shouldn’t cost 8Mil. these are the types of players that can be found mid way through the first round and later. These guys tend to be competitive and produce in short order because of effort.

by Jheiser3 on Jun 8, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah but

a gritty guy who can get you 15/15 IS worth it.

by CJHutch on Jun 8, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

16 and 11.7

in D’Antoni’s system which requires some adjustment too. If he did average 15 and 15 he’d be worth every penny of 10 Mil.

by Jheiser3 on Jun 8, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I said CAN

get you 15/15. No, I didn’t mean average that. I would say pay him Gilbert’s salary if he could AVERAGE 15/15

by CJHutch on Jun 9, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love Lee

but his price is going to astronomical, and Songalia will give you 1/2 to 3/4 of his production. Also, the Knicks are going to want a king’s ransom for him, based on his popularity. A more likely target for a sign and trade with NY (though hopefully not with the Wiz) would be Nate Robinson.

Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!

by Sean Fagan on Jun 8, 2009 3:22 PM EDT reply actions  

You run into the same problems with Nate too though

With the base-year compensation complications.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Jun 8, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

True True

and even less use to the team.

Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!

by Sean Fagan on Jun 8, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Memphis

Lee seems like a great fit for what Memphis needs and they wouldn’t have to worry about salary matching.

otherwise a 3rd team is needed. I could see OKC jumping in to help out as long as they get a pick and cash out of it.

by Jheiser3 on Jun 8, 2009 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

ya'll don't get to trade with new york

lest you take jeffries and someone who plays basketball.*

*robinson, lee, gallinari, chandler not included

by stingy d on Jun 9, 2009 1:04 AM EDT reply actions  

well there's

an oymoron. Nobody’s played basketball on the Knicks since Allan Houston left.

by CJHutch on Jun 9, 2009 12:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Randy Wittman Seems to "Get It"

Recent FanPosts

Small
Misusing Vesely
Tumblr_lpbvdtzztv1qc7c5to1_500_small
Best 2012 Draft lottery options?
Steves_small
Attention Mr. Stern - The Big Markets will kill the NBA
Tumblr_lpbvdtzztv1qc7c5to1_500_small
Kaman worth going after?
Small
The Wiz have 4 players worth keeping.
Steve_small
This Is Where I Stand
Stan_marsh_small
Is Kyrie Irving already 'All Star' good?
Unseld_small
Keep the Three Burritoes
Small
Rebuilding the Washington Wizards
Small
Should Wiz try a 2 PG lineup

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

Photo_on_2010-12-10_at_10 Bullet Nation in Exile