Part II- Flip's Toolbox - Backcourt Offense
Editor's Note: Bumped again. Bwoods is killing it recently. I'm also bumping this because I'm going out of town this weekend and I'm not sure how much I can post. We also all need something else to discuss since I think we all need a break from the impasse that's resulted in the previous thread. Let me be clear: I'm psyched by the discussion and I think many of you raised interesting points that I'm currently reconsidering, but we needed to move on.
More breaking down what Flip had to work with in his final Pistons season (07-08 EC Finalist) versus what he'll have this coming season. This time, the backcourt offense. I like what I see. (Which is good, since this team has stockpiled offensive guards.)
Starting PG: Chauncey Billups has been cited as the example of what Gilbert could look like (1) in a Flip Saunders offense, (2) if he loses some explosion from the knee injury but keeps the jump shot, and/or (3) if he plays "the right way" but remains a scoring pg. Statistically, Billups did not have his best season that year, but he had easily the best player-season on that team. He put up per-36 averages of 18.9 points, 7.6 assists, 3 rebounds, 2.3 TOs, and 1.4 steals per, while shooting 44.8% from the field (12.5 attempts per), 40.1% from three (4.9 attempts per), and 91.8% from the line (6.2 attempts per). He played 32 minutes per. That was good for a 23.5 PER and 12.8 win shares.
Can a relatively healthy Gilbert Arenas give you this? Generally, I think the answer is yes. Arenas will probably turn the ball over a bit more, but those %s are all doable at a minimum. The biggest question marks are probably (1) can he cut down on his FG attempts and (2) should he? I'm going to spin that out, as well as some more on the whole Chauncey = Gil thing, into its own post, but I think the answers to both of those questions are probably not. Zero > Big Shot, and you should let him be himself.
Starting SG: Rip Hamilton had probably the best overall run of his career under Flip Saunders. It was an amazingly consistent three-year period for him, with PERs ranging between 18.1 and 18.2 and Win Shares between 7.3 and 7.7. His averages (again, per 36) were 18.5 points, 4.4 assists, 3.5 rebounds, 2.0 TO, and 1.1 steals per. He shot 48.4%(15.3)/44.0%(2.1)/83.3%(3.3).*** As we all know, Rip gets his primarily from mid-range and by running around a lot. Watching him move around screens and up and down the baseline and on curls is fun; chasing him must not be for most players. Chauncey had the bulk of the 3-pt attempts while Rip took a lot of jump shots, though primarily from inside the line, and did not get to the free throw line all that much. 07-08 was Rip's best combination of % and volume from three in his career, but 2.1 attempts is pretty low for a 2 man these days.
The Wiz are getting something of a wildcard here. Mike Miller is coming off a mediocre season, but has done some good things in the past. That 05-06 sixth-man award winning season on a 49-win Grizzlies (yes, that's right, the Grizz won 49 games only 3 years ago, something the Wiz/Bullets last did 30 years ago) shows he can be a contributing player on a good team. It was, in his 25-y.o. season, probably the best overall of his career to date. He posted a PER of 17.2 and 7.1 Win Shares while playing nearly starter minutes (30.6 per), with only 9 starts. His per-36s: 16.1/3.2(ast)/6.3(reb) with 2.2 TOs and 0.8 steals. His %s 46.6% (12.1) / 40.7% (5.4) / 80.0% (3.3). Thanks to the higher volume 3-pt shooting while keeping a good percentage, that makes for higher true shooting % (59.5) and eFG% (55.7) than Hamilton has ever managed. And it wasn't even Miller's best shooting season. He has topped those from-the-floor stats since then. And those assists were actually the fewest assists he's had since his 3rd year in the league, so we know he is a capable passer.
His statistical body of work is very nice, and it gives a lot more confidence that he did have one good season on a good team. Also worth mentioning is that the man is really an athletic freak. He's listed at 6'8", 218lbs and is quick and agile. I can't imagine this Wizards team will set screens the way those Pistons did for Rip, but at the same time Miller is so much better able to get his own shot.
All of that said, he'll be 4 years removed from that season and may have picked up some bad habits on some abysmal teams since then. We'll have to wait and see. But, I think his ceiling is high-maybe very high-and he has shown he can contribute something comparable to what Rip gave Flip that year, but more of it will be from outside. He and a healthy Zero should Fill. It. Up. If he is given the opportunity to use enough possessions he might be the best candidate for an all-star bid from this team outside of Arenas.
*** These things helped earn Rip 5th place in Pradamaster's initial statistical sort looking for Arenas's ideal backcourt mate (http://www.bulletsforever.com/2009/6/17/912245/who-is-gilbert-arenas-ideal) and 9th in his revised ranking. In the same breakdown, Mike Miller started at 14th in the initial sort and got promoted to 3rd in the final. Probably worth keeping in mind during the angst over what became of that 5th pick.
Backcourt Reserves: The Pistons had rookies Stuckey and Afflalo, some arvis Hayes at SG (who also saw some SF), and got some temporary contributions from Juan Dixon, Flip Murray, and Lindsey Hunter. Dixon, Murray, and Hunter chipped in around the edges, I guess, but on the whole didn't contribute much to the effort and were basically waiver-wire-level fungible guards, so basically we are talking about 3300 minutes of Stuckey/Afflalo/Hayes. All three had below-average but not awful PERs (13.8/10.2/13.0). Stuckey got to the line some and had pretty good assist/TO #s. Afflalo was a decent rebounder for a guard but didn't do much else. Hayes shot a stunning 37.6% from three in 5.4 attempts per 36 minutes. (I am dumbfounded. I guess, just this once, I'll call him Jarvis.)
The Wizards would have to be pretty contented if they can get something like that out of Foye, Crittendon, and Young. Their respective last-season PERs were a surprisingly comparable 13.7, 10.3, 13.1. Foye is a better outside shooter but penetrates less than Stuckey did. Crittendon looks more than a little like Afflalo, which probably isn't very promising for his career, but isn't a death sentence. Young, I don't need to get into. So, while the Wiz might be content with their backups replicating those pistons #s, since our guards are all young and have already done that, there is some hope that they can do better. Foye in particular, as he progresses back from injury, has a shot at being league-average, especially as he'll have less load to carry than he did last year in Minny.
If Stevenson and Mike James are still here, they can probably supply whatever it was that the Pistons' scrubs (I mean veterans) brought to their backcourt.
Basically, if Arenas and Miller can stay healthy, this backcourt bench is probably good enough.
This represents the view of the user who wrote the FanPost, and not the entire Bullets Forever community. We're a place of many opinions, not just one.
3 recs |
32 comments
|
Comments
great post
just think arenas driving to the hole and dishing it out to miller for a three
by wizchamp on Jun 26, 2009 1:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well done
How do you think Randy Foye will fare when he is on the floor (with or without Arenas)?
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jun 26, 2009 2:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Interesting question
I have no idea. I’m not sure I’ve actually seen one minute of Foye in the league. Watched him often enough in college, but from the stats I gather he’s not quite the same player. Plus he was in that 3 guard offense back then. It seems like to take his game up a level he’ll need to penetrate more for more assists and trips to the line, as well as a bit of a boost in his FG%. But that’s just based on #s. He really does seem to have room for growth, but lots of guys never make that leap.
by bwoodsxyz on Jun 26, 2009 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foye came into the league with a reputation for taking it in strong
As a rookie, starting in Summer League, Randy Foye was supposed to be a guy with an uncanny ability to take it strong to the hole. He was MVP of the Summer League as a rookie, for example, and he did that because he could get inside at will against that competition.
The last two years — during his comeback from injury two years ago, and last year until he went out injured for the last stretch again — Foye really seemed to lose that. It may be that he hasn’t been healthy. He just doesn’t have the explosiveness, and frankly last year particularly when he was playing PG early he seemed not to have the confidence to take it into the lane. (Lots of Wolves fans thought Randy Wittman took the legs out from under the young players with his criticism as head coach.)
Foye’s court vision when he’s driving in narrows some, so he doesn’t get those handoff-for-the-dunk assists you think of with a Chris Paul. He’s going to score some of his own in that situation, but he hasn’t looked like a point guard breaking down the defense — not yet, anyway.
(I’m totally rooting for Randy, who’s a prince of a guy by pro athlete standards.)
by feral on Jun 27, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BWoods
I hope to see a Toolbox post on the Frontcourt Offense. These posts of yours are great.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 5:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Fine analysis and...
I suspect very close to what EG had in mind when he pulled the trigger on this one.
The big question for me is outside the numbers…. Knowing that Gil, Miller and Foye are going to pull at least 80 of the 96 backcourt minutes each game (35 for Gil, 25 for Foye, with Miller getting 20 in the backcourt and 8-10 backing up CB)… how do you keep Young’s head in the game? Crittenton I think recognizes that he is a max 10 minute player for the Wizards… but NY it will be tough I think.
by khrabb on Jun 26, 2009 5:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well that’s why most think he’ll be traded.
by Fundefined on Jun 26, 2009 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sad
He’ll become a nasty 20ppg guard. But I can agree that he probably doesn’t fit here.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's pretty clear when you sort out the numbers though...
and ironic since most of us were assuming Blatche was the expendable player, but clearly he is positioned as a key man!
by khrabb on Jun 26, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NY
My hope would be that Flip would give him a well-enough defined role, and a set alotment of minutes, even if it’s just 10-15 per, that he’ll feel involved and be able to make a contribution. And you’ve got to figure that among the top-3 guards they’ll combine to miss 10-15 games even if they are generally healthy. He’s still worth having around if he can’t bring back anything via trade.
by bwoodsxyz on Jun 26, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
are guys are getting ready to light it up this upcoming season …. Our team has a chip on its shoulders
by eltacoman on Jun 26, 2009 6:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is great
And great cause for optimism.
Unfortunately, I get the feeling our frontcourt situation may not be as positive. But who knows.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 6:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, for sure no one can run these types of numbers...
while the frontcourt situtation is still so fluid. As the Magic 8-Ball often says, “Unclear. Ask later,”
by khrabb on Jun 26, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very well done
I have been under the assumption that Foye was going to be the starter next to Arenas. I hope that is the case, as I believe he is longer for this team. As long as it’s not Stevenson, I can live with it.
by CJHutch on Jun 26, 2009 7:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Same here
If Miller’s as good a defender as Grunfeld says (which I doubt), it might make sense to start him, but I’d rather have Foye start if he’s going to be better on defense. In a way, I almost want us to continue to start Dominic McGuire at shooting guard, just because of how uncomfortable I am with our starting lineup’s defensive abilities. I mean, it’s not even a matter of effort with some of these guys, Gil and Antawn most likely are physically incapable of being anything more than slightly below average at this point.
by pantslessyoda1 on Jun 26, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mike Miller? Defense?
That’d be a different Miller than I know. Wait until you see his long, slow arms reaching out just after the jumper gets released by the opposing player…. Wait until you see his long, bad hairdo waving in the breeze as he wanders the perimeter. It’s a treat!
by feral on Jun 27, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, DSteve he's not
He has looked ok in the few games I’ve watched over the last few days, though. Maybe not good or even average, but he’s not quite an eyesore. I think that being tall and long kind of makes up for a lack of ability in some cases, too, which is probably part of why Nick Young’s defensive numbers aren’t really as bad as you’d think they’d be.
by pantslessyoda1 on Jun 28, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed!
I’m psyched about this trade. I agree that Miller is going to go off next to Gil if he starts. I do have some disappointment with Rubio dropping. He’s like that little box at Christmas from your extremely rich yet infamously cheap uncle. You want to open it so bad to see what you got. It’s an exciting mystery with potential to be a complete bummer of a gift. Sometimes you have to be dull and simply ask for money. Why? Because you have things to do and you know that cash is what you NEED.
Randy Foye is what excites me most. He has gotten better every year on a bad team. You can tell he is a baller though. Watching the press conference, both of the guys seem genuinely thrilled to be here and have a chance to win.
Flip gets me pumped too. His system has proven to work. It looks like the dude is cheesin’ hard on this roster. Washington has insane amounts of firepower.
This is a serious squad! Still hoping EG surprises us with another deal for a big. I am all about ZaZa. He can do the same things as Songaila and do so with some athleticism. I respect Songaila’s approach but I am glad he is gone simply for minute re-distribution. Plus Songaila’s verticle isn’t high enough to jump rope. My kids like dunks. I’ll take Wilcox too for the kids.
by Jahidi-hidi-hidi-Fleiss on Jun 26, 2009 7:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
GREAT post, mike. thanks for taking the time to pull it together. they will be a good, entertaining team and maybe more if the chips fall our way.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 7:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This wasn't me
It was bwoodsxyz.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
dude is on fire the last couple of days
I thought it was interesting that you said Miller was the best candidate to be an all-star this season. If gil comes back healthy Miller is going to benefit from it more than Caron and Antawn so that makes a lot of sense to me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk
by hibachi on Jun 26, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
i think on my first impression of the trade i was guilty of sleeping on miller and foye because the wolves sucked so bad last year and i’d kind of written them off – especially foye. hopefully miller bounces back big-time and foye breaks out. the fact that those are reasonable possibilities is what has me more excited about this trade than even a move for VC.
also, as long as we’re featuring arenas and jamison, we’re NEVER going to be a good defensive team. might as well load up on firepower. if we’re keeping the big 3, this is the right move.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 28, 2009 12:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Begging the questions
Why would anyone build around Jamison and Arenas….?
Why would Arenas get that contract coming off of such an injury….?
by feral on Jun 28, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because
Why would anyone build around Jamison and Arenas….?
They are both multiple time All-Stars who have proven their worth to the team.
Why would Arenas get that contract coming off of such an injury….?
I wouldn’t have, but that doesn’t mean it was stupid to do so. Lots of athletes have come back from these kind of knee injuries to be almost as effective as they were before. Before the knee injury, Arenas was a top 5 player in the NBA, IMO.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 30, 2009 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Don't Know Why Everybody Keeps Saying That
also, as long as we’re featuring arenas and jamison, we’re NEVER going to be a good defensive team.
Just because we haven’t had a coach that knows how to teach and/or implement a good defense, does not mean we are hopeless defensively. And just because we have guys that have appeared to be poor individual defenders, does not mean that they cannot effectively contribute to a good defensive scheme.
Stan Van Gundy turned a bunch of poor to mediocre individual defenders (not counting Howard, obviously) into a top 5 defense. Repeat after me, “It’s the scheme, stupid! It’s the scheme, stupid!”
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 30, 2009 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i guess i disagree
if we’re even an average defensive team i’ll be ecstatic.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 30, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the Wizards are an average defensive team
this year – and they are healthy – they’ll be in contention for the Eastern Conference…
I think “average” defense is a little too high to hope for…
I’m just hoping they don’t lead the league in 3-point shots allowed again.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 30, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why Not?
Flip inherited a 1995-96 Timberwolves team built around Tom Gugliotta, Kevin Garnett, and Isaiah Rider that finished 26th (out of 29) in the league in defensive rating. In his first full season as head coach in 1996-97, he took a Timberwolves team built around Tom Gugliotta, Kevin Garnett, and Stephon Marbury and had them finish 15th in the league in defensive rating. Now please tell me that this was not because of Flip’s coaching but instead due to Starbury’s stellar defense, so I can laugh at you.
He also got that franchise to the playoffs that season for the first time in its history. Not a bad one season turnaround. Now, the following season Flip’s defense fell back to 23rd, probably due to a focus on offense that saw their o-rating jump from 17th to 7th. After that season, Flip never again had a season in which his team’s defensive rating was worse than 16th, and four times he coached a top 10 defense.
I still think it’s the scheme, stupid. And I think that Flip has honed his scheme into a very good one over the years.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 1, 2009 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i hope you're right
but personnel matters too. pistons looked awful defensively that year they tried webber out in the pivot during the playoffs. disaster.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jul 1, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















