The NBA Draft: Once again, the Wizards try to have it both ways

Our 2009 draft pick. Yay!
I need to sleep on this before I say even more. We're all clearly angry, and justifiably so, so here's yet another thread to vent. Go ahead as long as you don't attack each other and keep it relatively civil.
My initial thoughts are these:
The jist of my criticism is pretty much as the same after the Minnesota trade on Tuesday: you can't have it both ways. The Wizards are already tax payers and their owner has said he desperately wants a championship. That's going to cost you money, unfortunately, even in this climate. Either you need to be a buyer, in which case you explore every possible avenue you can to upgrade your on-court product, even if it means taking on more long-term money, or you need to be a seller, where you're rebuilding and retooling at the expense of not competing. You can't be both.
The Wizards, for the past few days, have tried to be both, getting more talent for the short term (the Foye/Miller trade) while still saving some money long term (the trade, selling the 32nd pick when you could have had DeJuan Blair, which is exactly what you need as an interior guy). That doesn't get you far enough in either diretion. The draft today drove that point home very clearly.
Staying stuck in the middle means you take on the first trade you can think of for your #5 pick that allows you to accomplish your divergent goals instead of waiting on draft day when a guy like Vince Carter is available for expiring contracts and comparable young talent (Our expirings=more $ than Orlando's expirings and #5 is as least equal to Lee) or when Ricky flippin Rubio slips to you. The Rubio thing is particularly ridiculous for two reasons. First, he carries a lot of trade value, and second, even if he does stay in Spain as rumored, you still hold his draft rights, don't have to pay him (keep in mind part of the motivation of swapping 5 for Foye/Miller was that the latter two have shorter contracts that the #5) and, assuming you really believe a rookie won't help you much anyway, you don't have to actually give him minutes. There's a no-lose to drafting Rubio, even if he doesn't turn out to be as good as advertised.
One further thought on the last point about Rubio. The Wizards motto the entire month was that the fifth pick wouldn't provide immediate help anyway and therefore it wasn't worth adding another young player to the roster. If Rubio does indeed stay in Spain, he doesn't have to be on the roster until he's needed most. They can hold his rights, let him stay in Spain and use him as an asset again. Or, they can bring him over when his situation is more clear and when they need him more. The point is, even getting Rubio's draft rights is getting something for the fifth pick. They're still tradeable well after the draft and they effectively act as a draft pick since they aren't worth any salary in a trade. So even if Rubio doesn't come over, the Wizards would have effectively still held the fifth pick as an asset. They wouldn't have lost it.
Of course, the Wizards weren't sure Rubio would drop to 5 anyway (which may speak to a lack of intel within the organization), but the point still stands. A rookie like Tyreke Evans or James Harden is still an asset, albeit one with a salary. It's still worth something. It's still tradeable when something better comes along.
And then passing on DeJuan Blair ... that's just icing on the cake. Blair would have cost less than a million dollars next year and was statistically the best rebounder in college basketball in the last decade. What do the Wizards need among their interior players? Rebounding. As is repeated ad nauseum with a lot of truth, no skill translates better to the pros that rebounding. And we passed on that to sell the pick for cash. I don't think it's fair to call the organization cheap, because the Wizards are probably struggling with their bottom line, but that was a move that smacked of frugality. You could have helped solve your rebounding problems for less than a million dollars just by drafting Blair. Instead, now you have to do it for 5 million dollars, unless you want to let the team stay as is. That's poor management of the team's player payroll.
About the one thing we can say is that the WIzards are going to be better next year than last year and possibly even better than in 2008, 2007, 2006 or 2005. But as far as jumping to the level of title contenders, this was a huge missed opportunity.
I'll leave with one final thought. You see the San Antonio Spurs, long a team that hated paying the tax, becoming buyers by trading for a long-term contract like Richard Jefferson (who may not be that great anymore, but they took the better player, not the better contract) and drafting DeJuan Blair instead of selling the pick like many other teams. In not trading Antawn Jamison at the trade deadline to save money, the Wizards seemingly asserted that they were buyers. Their actions during draft week, though, indicate they were mostly sellers. If you were going to be a seller on draft day, you should have traded Jamison and committed to a clear course of action. Maybe you stink on the court, but you're clearly committed to rebuilding, and most fans will realize that. That's what makes the Spurs organization so great. Instead of learning a lesson from the Spurs, we demonstrated that we're kind of stuck in neutral.
0 recs |
335 comments
|
Comments
So Done
I cant believe this. At all. Take a chance The Spurs always seem to benefit from our mistakes.
by Unkle Wheez on Jun 25, 2009 11:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This whole night stunk and you encapsulated it beautifully
Why can’t the Wizards make up their mind. I remember the pick a meme thread. This fits in with that. And speaking of more stupid GM tricks. Patty Mills falls to 55 and the Blazers, I swear you can’t make this stuff up!
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jun 25, 2009 11:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Although in that post I was pointing out the difference between the GM and the coach. Here, it’s like Ernie is going Jekel&Hyde on us.
by Pryme on Jun 26, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i appreciate you being measured
but this is b.s.. there were some quality players left at 32 (Blair, Summers, Sam Young) and they chose cash…The smugness and complacency about their current roster is mind boggling..
twitter.com/rashad20
by rashad20 on Jun 25, 2009 11:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I feel your pain man
I reayy pissed off also.
48 hours ago, we pretty much had RUBIO in our hand, possibly one of the most exciting and upcoming young pg in the future. But now, we had two guys who probably wont worth as much as Rubio. We just RUSH through the trade w/o waiting who might fallin into #5 spot. Even Ernie said it that they want to do the trade as quickly as possible b/c they afraid that someone will have a better offer. THis show how poor judgement our team office has and thats why we will never win a championship.
Im terribly dissapointed….Rubio was within reach 48 hours ago, but now, it just a broken dream and it will haunt us for the next decade.
by MitchieMit on Jun 25, 2009 11:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Blair is an excellent rebounder who fill our need and
cost us less than 1 mil, but b/c they want a “veteran” guy who has experience, they gonna go get that guy and not even draft Blair. I mean hes a rookie with cheap contract and if he doesnt work out, we cant cut him later. But not to even draft him, and let him be a part of this team, it just ridiculous. F*ck u Abe
by MitchieMit on Jun 26, 2009 12:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And
I am sure Ernie knows he makes a mistake by pulling a quick trigger on that trade b/c he cant imagine Rubio slip to our spot. What a shame…bad luck after bad luck
by MitchieMit on Jun 26, 2009 12:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I am over the Wizards
...one of those guys who reads all the time but barely comments
by Juice over Whine on Jun 26, 2009 12:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
pissed off
The wizards ruin another draft, by my count the 1000th in a row. I dont like the miller trade but if they r so desperate to save money i guess i understand. but the blair trade baffles me. it would have been a non guaranteed contract and worth much less than the equivalent FA. its not being cheap its being stupid.
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 12:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good measured analysis as always.
My addition: Ernie knows he still has to find another big man somewhere – so if he didn’t like anyone at 32 then he’ll just have to figure out something else. It’s really hard to completely grade his offseason moves until we see what, if anything, he does with the MLE and Mike James’ expiring contract. I hate missing out on Blair and I think trading for Foye/Miller was too early when Carter was available, but the roster WILL be better this year. I give him some benefit of the doubt, because until opening night it’s really too soon to know how good we’ll be.
This team will be fun to watch. Whether we win is another matter, but now that Ernie had made his bed in terms of the composition of the roster, it’s time to see if anyone wants to lie in it.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 12:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah this was pretty bad. I’m not a big Rubio fan, but if had sat where we were we could have had Rubio and Blair, and kept out other assets to solve our remaining needs.
by Aldo on Jun 26, 2009 12:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
blair
the fact the spurs got blair and the wiz passed on him proves he will be good, the spurs being one of the best drafters and the wiz one of the worst.
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Wizards for some reason
Actually think that this team is already championship contenders and that we don’t need to make any other move. They seem blinded from the fact that practically all of the East has gotten better. We’ve made a slight move to get better but slight moves only get you to a fifth seed and a first round exit. We needed (and still do) to make some sort of boulder sized splash in order to truly compete. All we did was drop a pebble in the “pond” of the eastern conference and that just isn’t going to cut it. I was hoping first round exits were a thing of the past but we are talking about the Wizards so I guess I shouldn’t expect anything more.
by bigrm18 on Jun 26, 2009 12:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
agree 100%. this best this team can possibly do is a 2nd round appearance.
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why cant we have an owner
like Ted Leonsis who is willin to do anything and payin lots of money to make his team a winner. Instead we get a grumpy old cheap Abe who not even willin to spend money to buy his own pamper
by MitchieMit on Jun 26, 2009 12:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm even craving for Dan Snyder right now
Dan Snyder is the owner of the Washington Redskins and spends money on free agents like no other in the NFL for those who didn’t know.
by bigrm18 on Jun 26, 2009 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither have won anything
Even though both of them spend mind boggling amounts of money on their teams neither has achieved anything!!!!!!!!!!!
by tachmelik12 on Jun 26, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At Least
The Caps Seem to be on the right track.
by Unkle Wheez on Jun 26, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather spend money
and at least have hope that we could win something than not spend money and already know that we aren’t going to amount to anything. The Capitals were second in the eastern conference and were 1 game away from reaching the eastern conference finals. Many experts of the NHL have them as a team that could reach the finals and possibly win the championship. The Redskins may not win a lot of games but at least they have an owner that is willing to spend the money to make his team better by any means necessary. If Snyder was our owner I guarantee you that we would get Lebron in the 2010 free agency.
by bigrm18 on Jun 26, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not a title contender
You would think with the way AJ’s and Arenas’s contracts are gonna ballon, and with haywood needing a new deal, we would try and get as many players on cheap contracts as possible to balance out the cap a little. Vets make way more. I don’t understand this “we are looking for vets because we are trying to win now and rookies can’t crack our rotation” BS. It’s one thing if we can get a Marcus Camby but what other names out there would play way better than Mcgee or Blatche? If we’re looking for a 5th big to step up if one of the top 4 bigs go down why don’t we get a guy with a super cheap contract and some upside? Caron and Foye have their contracts ending after next season and I think Haywood will be way harder to resign than people think. If we don’t have a bunch of young guys at the end of our bench this year, who will replace people as their contracts end? We are going to be over the cap for atleast 3 years unless we really gut the team and rebuild. We’ll be forced to resign our guys or risk having them leave and not being able to sign anyone from outside the team unless we do sign and trades or complicated stuff. Are we just deciding the next 2 years are our window and we’ll just totally tank and rebuild after? Why can’t we leave ourselves some room to develop cheap young talent so we can keep on retooling and allow us to let guys go if we have too? If a rebuilding year is the cost for making a run with this team the next 2 years I say no thanks. To win a title in the next 2 years would take a crazy fluke or NY, JC, Foye, and JM all blossoming into great players the next 2 seasons. I hope EG has something up his sleeve.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 26, 2009 12:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Championship
wont arrive to DC. All I got to do is to move myself outta this city and go somewhere else!!
by MitchieMit on Jun 26, 2009 12:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I tried that
and moved to San Francisco and now I have to watch the Warriors.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 26, 2009 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do We
Get to use the cash toward the cap?
by Unkle Wheez on Jun 26, 2009 12:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No
It will be used for Abe’s medical bill
by MitchieMit on Jun 26, 2009 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haters
YOU want it both ways.
1. You want to HATE the Wizards so you have something to bitch about, but then you want to WIN (supposedly).
2. You want to win NOW because that’s the team we have, but you hate when we ship picks for cash or trade them. (You also hated JaVale McGee, too.)
DC fans at their finest. I’m excited about this year, and think we’ll sign/trade for someone solid.
by oatmealeater on Jun 26, 2009 12:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ofcouse
we hate it b/c we r a hardcore bullets fan and we deserve better than this.
by MitchieMit on Jun 26, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are dead wrong
And I think you’ve missed the point. People on here belive that Rubio and DeJuan Blair could’ve helped this team win now. A lot of sensible people on this board didn’t like the deal before this. I hope you are right, but it is difficult to be excited after a night like tonight. Especially when it might be driven, by an owner unwilling to spend to win a title.
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jun 26, 2009 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rubio
would not help now, even if he’s not going back to Europe for 2 more years
by 7Swords of Salat on Jun 26, 2009 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats not what anyone is saying
how is selling the pick helping us win now or at all? they dont trade the big 3, thus deciding to play for now. then they make the mike miller trade and trading the picks both to save money, making the team worse and hurting the current team. people wanted them to make trades to get better. the wiz are trying to win now, but also save money. they cant have it both ways and this wont hep do either
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not true
then they make the mike miller trade and trading the picks both to save money, making the team worse and hurting the current team.
Criticize if you will but saying that the Wiz are a worse team after the trade than before the trade is complete bull. Mike Miller + Foye are a huge upgrade on Pech, ET, and Songalia. Yeah I said huge. Blair was a nice player but the fact that everyone in the league passed on giving him guaranteed money should tell you something. He measured 6’6" and overweight. Ever wonder why despite the stats linked in this post that show his great R40 that he still didn’t lead the country in rebounding? Because he was on the bench half their games unable to stay out of foul trouble. That’s not to say I wasn’t disappointed that they passed on him, but this is an awful lot of kneejerk whining here.
by Mixmy1200s on Jun 26, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm fine with the trade
I just think that it would have made sense to take Blair. No one thought he’d fall this far, and it would have helped a team weakness: rebounding. It’s not like they’d have to pay him a ton of money either.
by Matt K. on Jun 26, 2009 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it comes from backing this team for 20 years
I’m not crying about missing Rubio (even as much as I hate Mike Miller), nobody truly expected him to be there and 5 minutes ain’t a long time to work a trade. Plus, the kid is 18 and for every Tony Parker there are 10 Darko Milicic’s. That being said, passing on the best rebounder in the draft (when that’s what they need the most up front – toughness and rebounding) when you’re going to get him on the cheap and don’t even have to guarantee it is just one of those things you get used to seeing as a bullets fan. Just like being in the lottery in a crap draft, and then dropping to 5th just to make it funnier. Or Kwame Brown as number one overall. Or screwing up contract talks and ending up giving Juwan $100 million after the commish voided the deal to Miami. Or giving Arenas $111 million, period (knees or not, he’s not a max player at PG). Or giving 34 year old AJ 4 more years for $60 million. Or trading for the ghost of Mitch Richmond. Or grossly over-paying Ike Austin. Or drafting a Russian 7 footer who loves to stand at the arc and shoot 3’s. And make 27% of them. I can go on if anybody wants.
The point is, we don’t hate the Bullets. We don’t want to hate the Bullets. I don’t even think it’s possible to hate the Bullets at this point. Right now it’d be something just to get beyond bemused resignation…
by imperialme on Jun 26, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When will
the curse will finally be lifted…
by MitchieMit on Jun 26, 2009 12:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
cash
i stil like the trade. they believe the future is now, so the trade makes sense. i agree with them – might as well go for it now, and if it doesn’t work, then start over. chances are pretty good rubio will just be another player anyway.
the cash for the draft pick – that only makes sense if they can get do something else to get a big guy. if they pull that off, then all is forgiven. but they have to pull it off.
would they have enough roster space for Blair (or somebody) if they trade James/Young for a decent big? i’d guess they would, but i don’t have the numbers handy. if so, then the cheap label is perhaps justified. they’re are times to be cheap, but not this year.
maybe the plan then is to use the cash to sign a MLE? then they are forgiven again.,if they do it right.
by stevie on Jun 26, 2009 12:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah i think we will have some good news tomorrow maybe we have a trade in the works
we will have to wait till july for
MLE = PF/C VET Rasheed ? McDysse ?
by eltacoman on Jun 26, 2009 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we could have used blair, yeah
why not take a shot on him? it costs us practically nothing. i don’t get that either. that’s a bit too much on the side of writing off a pick just because it’s unlikely it works out. we could have had blair and a veteran signing if we weren’t counting pennies.
as for rubio, i have a couple issues with the argument. we’re in win now mode, like it or not.
1 – rubio is great right away. okay we blew it.
2 – rubio struggles mightily early but is great a couple years from now. arguably we’re short sighted, but you have to respect the flip side of what we did.
3 – rubio stays in europe – how does that help us win now???? you’re assuming he’s going to be great and it’s worth it.
4 – we could have gotten a better trade with rubio as a chip. maybe. maybe not. i’m not so sure. it’s definitely debatable.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 12:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
oh yeah
i forgot 5 – rubio is a bust
reasonable possibility
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m almost dead certain 4 is not debatable. Rubio would have commanded a better trade than Foye and Miller.
by Fundefined on Jun 26, 2009 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly my point
You hate because you’re a fan? Doesn’t make sense (up to a point, up to a “Wes Unseld was an awful coach, let’s make him a GM” point).
You deserve better than this? Than what, 20 years of misery, and now, finally, at least a winner? A GM that has made deft trades and good picks with what he’s got? Ernie Grunfield can GM this team until he dies, and I’m satisfied. The man’s a consummate pro, keeps his mouth shut, makes smart moves (considering the situation he’s been in with drafts, players, and having a coach hired before he was hired) he’s own a nice cushion.
by oatmealeater on Jun 26, 2009 12:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wow
“A GM that has made deft trades and good picks with what he’s got?” are you joking? the wiz are statistically the 4th worst drafting team in the league.
http://a.espncdn.com/i/mag/blog/2009/0615clipsgraph2.jpg
the wiz had to give up the 5 to get rid of bad contracts which grunfeld signed. he gave up rubio to clean up his own mess. he gave up blair for what? so they can get someone worse for more money? explain that trade. how does it help when they now have to spend more money for an old vet.
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i Trust that Ernie Grunfield has something up his sleeve im just hoping it dose not involve Mcgee thats all
by eltacoman on Jun 26, 2009 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ill give him credit
for butler and for arenas and jamesion the first time, and mcgee. but name another good move.
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
finding DS the first time on the cheap, letting Hughes and Jeffries go is about all I can think of.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 26, 2009 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hughes and Jeffries were a no brainer, the offers given were ridiculously high and disproportionate for their level of talent.
by Fundefined on Jun 26, 2009 2:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wish he had felt that way about DS's second contract and Etan
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 26, 2009 2:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes on Stevenson
Thomas was a much tougher call at the time then people realize.
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jun 26, 2009 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Take
I still think the Miller/Foye trade is a pretty defensible move and a potentially good one. I think it went from no-brainer good to potentially good as soon as Rubio fell to #5. The trade is almost every bit as good as it was yesterday if he does stay in Europe for 1-2 season because he would have been no use to us at all within our window to compete with the current roster.
Selling the #32 pick is COMPLETELY INDEFENSIBLE. Its a non-basketball decision. We could have cut salary last Feb at the trading deadline or tried to get the Spur’s non-guaranteed contracts for Antawn, but instead we traded for Veteran players who kep us paying the luxury tax. We have committed to paying the tax, so why sell the #32 pick? This is a move that actually COSTS us money. To get a veteran who will do what we could have gotten out of Blair it will cost us at least $2m/yr. We could have had Blair for about $700k. Basically unless Ernie is truly done spending more money we actually just lost about $1.4mil over the 3 yr contract Blair would (may) have gotten just to get a player with less potential who is older. It makes NO SENSE and so I think its a completely ridiculous move.
Ernie didn’t know Rubio was going to be there and could argue that Miller/Foye were better anyway, but Ernie DID KNOW that the trade he made left us with a truly gaping hole in the rebounding department. Instead of trying to solve it when the best rebounder in the entire draft miraculously fell into our laps, he spat in our faces by selling the pick and telling the fan base to collectively “deal with it, we are stuck with what we have.” We now have one fewer asset that we could have used in a trade with Mike James’ contract in order to get a veteran. I now don’t think we have any prayer of landing Marcus Camby and I think the best we will do is someone for the veteran’s minimum (MORE THAN BLAIR WOULD HAVE MADE) off the free agency pu-pu platter.
Ernie, you fucked up big time and its really pathetic that someone so experienced would have so little understanding of the salary structure and the need to actually follow a path once you’ve picked it.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 12:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
finally
i get someone talking sensibly. i do disagree with your take on the rubio deal, because a ton of teams were after rubio and with him falling there the pick just gains value, IMO enough to get minn to throw one of there late picks. i agree 100% about blair, and am proudly wearing my fire ernie shirt right now.
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thing is, it wasn't the Rubio deal
3 teams had to pass on Rubio for him to get to #5. This trade was the #5 + salary for good veterans who met a positional need with expiring contracts.
If you are going to fault Ernie for making the trade before we were on the clock, thats fair, but he got good value if the pick had been a Johnny Flynn or Tyreke Evans and 5minutes is not enough time to swing this kind of deal. Overall I am alot more bummed on the betrayal represented by selling the draft pick than the trade.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the point is
you keep the pick until the last possible minute. THAT’S how you get max value. You think the Wolves wouldn’t have made that trade at 7:45? yes, they would’ve. Only they would’ve given up more knowing Rubio was there.
by CJHutch on Jun 26, 2009 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What if?
Rubio isn’t there?
Do the Wolves make this deal? Do we get to jettison salary in addition to picking up players of need?
The trade is defensible, but hindsight gives you the better of the argument about WHEN it should have been made.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a fair point
But it still doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a good idea not to hold onto the pick until draft day. Best-case scenario, the offers improve. Worse-case scenario, they don’t, Minnesota balks and you end up with a top-five pick. Even in this draft, that’s something. It then leaves you much more time and much less desperation to make a move all summer.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 1:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also a fair point
i just think it’s hard to say EG definitely should have waited because of what happened. we’ll just have to disagree on this one.
if you didn’t like the move he made, or if you just wanted to roll the dice on getting rubio, then yeah, get angry.
but there are so many reasons why EG might have gotten a better deal by acting early that they shouldn’t all be discounted. and i’m still honestly not sure EG could have done much better than he did even if he had waited until we had rubio as a chip. we weren’t getting much else out of minny. not guaranteed if anyone else with better to offer was interested. why didn’t memphis trade their pick?
unfortunately we’ll never know about the trade angle… we’ll only know whether we should have gambled on landing rubio – if he’s that good then oops.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 1:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't mind
disagreeeing. But deals are done during the draft all the time, including yesterday. Minnesota wanted Rubio. If he was there, and we threatened to take him, they would have bit. And if not them, then someone else. I would’ve rather taken Rubio, or even Evans. (I know I said I’d only name one guy, but I didn’t think Rubio would be there)
Like I keep saying, neither Foye/Miller OR Rubio/Evans/Derozan will get us past the teams in front of us. The difference is, you know what you get with Foye/Miller. What IF Rubio becomes the next Pistol Pete? Or even Steve Nash? THAT’S what can turn your team around. Miami didn’t know what they were getting when they drafted at #5 in ‘03. They knew Wade was a pretty good player in college. But he had his question marks. They had no idea they were going to get arguable one of the top 2-4 players in the league. That’s the excitement of the draft. Any one of these players can break out and do so much better than anyone expected.
by CJHutch on Jun 26, 2009 5:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the point stands
that the Wizards wanted proven commodities that can contribute right now. So a player at number 5 didn’t excite them. Look, I know we are all bummed about Rubio – but DWFan makes several great points.
1) What did three other teams not like about Rubio to let him slide?
2) Where is his jump shot?
I’m not the biggest EG fan in the world, but you have to let this pan out before everyone pops a vein. You keep reiterating that we can’t past the other teams in the East, meanwhile Orlando rolled some major dice to make a questionable move, and Cleveland was desperate enough to grab a washed up Shaq. When this team is healthy, we can take anyone in the east, and I don’t think Ricky Rubio or a 2nd round pick were going to help us this year.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair on the whole maybe but
i think EG understands the salary structure. if he plans to get a veteran either way then not paying blair and getting money for that pick saves the team money.
it still sucks from the other perspectives you pointed out.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 1:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we get someone like any of these guys?
Paul Millsap, Shawn Marion, Carlos Boozer, Anderson Vareja, Drew Gooden,
by Unkle Wheez on Jun 26, 2009 1:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Marion or Gooden at the MLE
They will demand multi-year contracts that we don’t want to give them though.
Millsap, Boozer and Varejao will be too expensive.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok ill provide some optimism since everyone is being so negative
you know it’s easy to say oh the trade sucks b/c rubio was at 5 but that’s easy to say after the fact. he was projected to go top 4 so when the wiz got talking to minnasota they took the trade. if rubio wasn’t there you’d probably be happy we took the trade. he didn’t want to play in dc anyway b/c gil is here and he is the primary ball handler. as for blair, yes he was there for the taking but would he really have gotten playing time over mcgee or blatche…probably not.
we can still make moves b/c we still have valuable assets in nick, and javale so not all our cards have been played yet. and even if we don’t make another move so what, have some faith. maybe they decided not to get another big b/c they believe highly in blatche and mcgee. give the team a chance before you write them off
by theintz on Jun 26, 2009 1:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Trading Javale
Bad idea. we are already thin with big men.
by Unkle Wheez on Jun 26, 2009 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed I think JM can be great
more so than any of the other young guys.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 26, 2009 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
To me Jave really wants to be great and will work to get there.
by Unkle Wheez on Jun 26, 2009 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he’s a legit 7-footer and athletic freak. He can be like a taller Camby in his prime. Guys that can get a double double every night, cover centers, and block shots are rare. Plus his contract is cheap.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 26, 2009 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its
not that he would have been better than those two. It is that he offers what they don.t.
by Unkle Wheez on Jun 26, 2009 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
blair
woulda gotten time because the wiz have only 4 PF/C in haywood, javale, blatche and jamesion. haywood is a good defender and rebounder. mcgee and blatche have both shown promise but are mostly unproven and jamesion is good but is not a power rebounder or defender. blair is both. he fits perfectly with this team but now we will be charged more for less result.
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gil is here??
This is another area of assumption….there is no guarantee that he will be 100% coming back, we all know what potential(yes its a dirty word) Gil has when healthy but we havent seen that in several years. The entire deck of cards crumbles if he is unable to be the Hibachi master for the next two years. My biggest problem with the trade was that we didnt force Minnesota to cough up one of their later draft picks, they had three in the first (6, 18, and 28) and then two more in the second. We should have gotten at least another draft pick back in the trade. This would have given us the possibility to move James and the pick for one of the veterans that we need to complete the roster. Swingman defender that can rebound……I still wish they had tried to get Tayshaun Prince out of Detroit.
by Ltrepeter2000 on Jun 26, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The genius of it all...
…is that Rubio / Arenas would generate way more revenue for Les Boulez. Fill the seats. on TNT every night. Kids in Spain wearing Rubio ‘duracel’ jerseys. Peeps getting hyped up about Ricky the Wizard, casting his spell on Lebron. Rickey breaking Lebron’s ankles, crab stepping all over Lebron and Shaq. Little EuroTrash making Lebron/Shaq look idgets.
This day will live in infamy.
btw, Rubio in Spain the next two years is just wishful thinking for Les Boulez.
by ucantstopbernard on Jun 26, 2009 1:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Khan
just heard him on Mike and Mike and sounds like he knows Rubio will be going back to Europe
by 7Swords of Salat on Jun 26, 2009 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
who wants my season tickets
i can live with trading the five pick even if i dont agree with the move bu trading a second round pick for cash when there was a guy on the board who could help this team is unacceptable
by wizfan2247 on Jun 26, 2009 1:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey guys I'm officially happy now...
…I just remembered that I’m not an Eagles fan.
by ucantstopbernard on Jun 26, 2009 1:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i am so sorry!!
don’t worry, Kevin Kolb is the answer :-) you’all actually did nice in the draft
by ucantstopbernard on Jun 26, 2009 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So I turn
off the draft to go to work. Get here and find out we passed on Blair? For CASH?? WTF?? How does THAT help us this year? I was just coming to terms on the trade (though I’ll ALWAYS know we got shafted), and now I find out we made another stupid move. Or non move. And anyone who thinks Blair can’t help us, watch his game against the #2 pick. Even if he’s a question mark, so what? He’s a player. We got nothing of use to the team for him. What are we gonna do with the 2.5 mil, buy some Sprite from Lebron to butter him up?? We could have used that pick on a solid bench rebounder which we don’t have right now.
I’ve been reticent to criticize Ernie because he’s the 1st real GM we’ve had here in over decades. But this is pitiful. If you like the trade, fine. I can understand that. I don’t Regardless, it would have been there. More likely though, a better one would’ve been there. Like I said before, Ernie took the easy way out. That doesn’t win you championships. This franchise has been bad for so long, they are happy to just be in the playoofs, be a middle of the pack team. We will not compete with the top teams with this roster. We needed a BLOCKBUSTER trade, which we didn’t get, or a star in the draft. Could Rubio, or even Evans, been a bust? Yeah. But you don’t win without taking chances.
Cleveland and Orlando were better than us already. We got marginally better after the trade. But they were still better than us. Then they each add an All-Star. UGH!
by CJHutch on Jun 26, 2009 1:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ahh.... but the braintrust is working on a master plan...
…my inside sources are telling me that we’re working on luring Chamique Holdsclaw out of retirement
by ucantstopbernard on Jun 26, 2009 1:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
She will really improve the looks
Of the Wizards Dance Team … (still the franchise’s weakest link).
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...in all seriousness, we need...
…cash, US dollar greenbacks for scouts in the jungles of papau new guinea to find the next mugsy bogues, transylvania to find the next gheorghe, sudan to find the next manute, old country buffet to find the next Hot Plate.
Does it get any better than this?
by ucantstopbernard on Jun 26, 2009 1:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you
For making me lose my shit and crack up. I REALLY appreciate it.
I actually kinda miss those days of being the circus team that employed the tallest guy and the shorter guy just to say we did and because we sucked ass.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 1:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're welcome...
that’s the reason I’m a bullets fan, always a premium product, just like a mcdonald’s premium chicken salad.
by ucantstopbernard on Jun 26, 2009 1:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if weed
was legal, we wouldn’t be in this mess. Chris Webber gets a marijuana charge, and we ship him out for a relic. We’ve been snakebitten since.
by CJHutch on Jun 26, 2009 6:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh no we've been snakebitten a lot longer
Every since Kenny Green instead of Karl Malone.
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jun 26, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The more I think about this
The more depressed I am.
Our roster is what it is. We will be the #4 or #5 in the east and probably lose in the first round in 5 or 6 games.
We aren’t getting any better this off season. Ernie doesn’t sell a pick for $2.5m and then turn around and sign someone to a MLE contract. We will sign some crap veteran to a one year deal and Ernie will pontificate on how this veteran is “ready to play” and thats it. We will actually go into the season without a single legitimate physical presence or rebounder on the bench and we will get killed in the paint.
It is, what it is. I hoped for more and I should have known better.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 1:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
All in all...
….i know I’m being a downright pooper, and we owe it to ourselves to see the final product on the court. Just wish Rubio was a Wizard — so close yet so far!!!
Wilbon had a decent article — he gets it.
by ucantstopbernard on Jun 26, 2009 1:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Link to the Wilbon article?
Didn’t see anything relevant on the post website
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 1:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
its there
he is reporting the Amare trade as done.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 26, 2009 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wilbon article -- Wizards will Regret Rubio
by ucantstopbernard on Jun 26, 2009 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
phew
well now i really like what the wiz did.
a while back i wanted to start a betting business solely by banking on the opposite of wilbon’s predictions.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still wish we had waited to make the trade but.....
I think that to assume we would have had Rubio at 5 is an oversimplification. Minny wanted Rubio and they probably could have gone from 6 to 2,3 or 4 alot fairly easily. To just figure the draft would have played out the way it did is probably unrealistic.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 26, 2009 1:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You're absolutely right...
…if we’d kept the pick there would be NO WAY IN THIS UNIVERSE THAT RUBIO WOULD HAVE FALLEN TO US TO PICK.
by ucantstopbernard on Jun 26, 2009 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
would anyone mind
if i posted ernie grunfeld’s work email? i happen to have it.
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 4:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
we would love it
But you probably shouldn’t.
by disgrunted on Jun 26, 2009 6:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But what would you write to EG if you had his e-mail...
Chad Ford on espn.com did not give out many A grades for this draft, but the Wizards got one of them…
Not taking Blair at 32 (kudos to the Spurs, as usual, by the way for takling him at 37) and getting $2.5 million for the rights to J Taylor suggests that the Wizards are raising a war chest for (please, God!) a big move in the big man and backup big man market…
It ain’t over ’til its over and if EG brings in a combination like Varejao or Marion or Kirilenko or Gortat and McDyess or Nesterovic then the Wizards will be a very dangerous team in the here and now.
Patience… within 45 days all will be revealed (I fervently believe).
by khrabb on Jun 26, 2009 6:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please don't
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 6:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post, Mike
The morning after, when people like Chad Ford are giving stupidly giving the Wizards an “A” for their draft, it’s nice to come over here to read the thoughts of people who really know the team and who recognize what really went down, why, and its implications. Misery loves company.
Everyone has covered this issue pretty well in posts over the past day, so I won’t repeat what has already been said. The only new point I can think to add is that Ernie’s moves go to show what kind of awful things can happen when you operate under faulty assumptions:
- This team is ready to contend for a championship if only they can add a couple of veteran role players to the mix. This is the most mindboggling assumption of all, because 2 of your “Big 3” just led the team to a 19-63 record.
- This team’s window of opportunity is closing. Arenas is 27, and Butler and Haywood are 29. They’ve each got 4 or 5 good years left, at least.
- If a draft pick can’t make your rotation in the first year, he shouldn’t be picked. Seems like Ernie never made this assumption before, including last year when he had the same “veteran” team ready to contend, and he picked McGee.
by disgrunted on Jun 26, 2009 6:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I should have put my comment here, too!
If EG makes the right big man moves much will be forgiven….
by khrabb on Jun 26, 2009 7:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep
It’s not like the Wizards are short on youth. Ernie has done a remarkably good job keeping this team balanced with veterans and young prospects (unlike the Cavs for example). Do I wish the Wizards had held onto the 5th now that we know Rubio slipped? Probably, but I’m uncertain. There’s no question they’re a better team this year and probably next because of this trade. Do I wish they drafted Blair instead of trading it for $2.5 million? Well that depends on if they’re going to grab another frontcourt player thru free agency.
Every organization has a budget to stay within. The Wizards have extended their budget in a tough economic time, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have limits.
by Johnnie Futbol on Jun 26, 2009 7:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chris Bosh might be the only thing that gets me over this
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jun 26, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
on the contrary
i think 2 of the big 3 leading a team to a 19-63 record showed precisely why we need a couple more above average nba players in here.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FYI folks
Probably not getting much computer access until after 3 today, since I’m at a conference in DC for my current job.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 8:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
By the way
Looks like Amare is indeed likely to head to Golden State for Biedrins, Curry, Wright and Belinelli.
Link.
If that trade does indeed go through, I’m actually not too upset about not getting Amare. Golden State gave up a ton to get him that I don’t think we could have been able to trump unless we gave them Butler + 5. Biedrins is underrated and they’re getting three promising young guys. The equivalent would be if we gave up Butler, Blatche, Critt and 5, and I think that’s too much.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 8:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That IS an extraordinarily high price to pay for Amare...
Steve Kerr may have just saved his job!
Curry can learn next to Nash and then replace him…
All of the guys the Suns picked up are lean and fast.
Shaq is gone and Hill will be also.
Can’t fault this deal.
by khrabb on Jun 26, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wright, Stephen Curry, Biedrins, Belinelli
If that is what the Suns are getting for Stoudemire, I absolutely love that deal for the Suns. Can we get D’Antoni out of MSG hell and bring him back to the Suns now. 7 seconds or less is back!
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jun 26, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The amount of angst i'm seeing is amazing...
Let’s get some perspective. Here are the last 10 years of number 5 picks:
Kevin Love, Jeff Green, Shelden Williams, Raymond Felton, Dwayne Wade, Devin Harris, Dwayne Wade, Nikoloz Tskitishvili, Jason Richardson, Mike Miller, Jonothan Bender, Vince Carter.
Now it’s possible that the 18 year old Rubio is Dwayne Wade or Vinsanity. However, the odds are against it. The truth is Mike Miller is one of the better names on this list, and we got another guy that is probably more valuable than Jeff Green, Shelden Williams, Raymond Felton, Tskitishvili or Bender in Rndy Foye. Ernie was playing the odds and played them right. Is there risk that it may come back to bite them? Sure but nobody knows so you have to play the odds.
For those talking about titles. Unless you have a truly amazing talent, like Shaq, Magic, Bird, Vinsanity and Wade weren’t good enough. The truth is that veterans compete for titles. I don’t actually think the Wizards are contenders right now after a 19 win season, but if they want to contend they need vets. Look at the final 4 teams in the playoffs this year.
As fars as Blair goes. I’m a little frustrated, but If any team in the league should be afraid of knees it’s the Wiz. Also, even if Flip plays his players less minutes (I hope) there won’t be many minutes available for our hypothetical big man. Assume 30 minutes each for Haywood and Jamison that leaves 36 minutes at the 4/5 slot. If you give McGee and Blatche each 15 that leaves 6 minutes of tough rebounding and hustle from big man #5. If whoever Ernie gets takes minutes from Blatche and McGee, it will have been a good get and people on this blog will be complaining bitterly.
by NeverNervousPervis on Jun 26, 2009 10:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that should read...
Unless you have a truly amazing talent, like Shaq, Magic, or Bird, (Vinsanity and Wade weren’t good enough) young players don’t make you contenders.
by NeverNervousPervis on Jun 26, 2009 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No
I don’t actually think the Wizards are contenders right now after a 19 win season, but if they want to contend they need vets. Look at the final 4 teams in the playoffs this year.
You need good players, no matter their age. This line of thinking is silly and, frankly, EG speak.
Vince Carter is a veteran too.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am competely confused
So do we dislike what Eddie Jordan did?
Or what Grunfeld has done?
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The last sentence was trying say that ability matters, not age
By suggesting that, if veterans were the goal, Carter’s preferable to Miller/Foye.
The teams that won the title did it with a combination of veterans and youth. They did it with guys who could play, not guys who were experienced.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I think EG is shortsighted when it comes to the impact of young players. Of course, he might feel burned by AB and NY.
My hope is that at 11:59 on July 7th, EG will have parked his bitching Oldsmobile outside of either Zaza’s or Gortat’s house and brings one of them in, and manages to acquire a PF through trade.
As I have said in other posts, I am saving my pitchfork for training camp. If we roll in with 7 guards, then I think its a clear indicator that we have a stupid GM. Even if I dislike EG, I don’t think he is stupid.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll still be upset because I think this was a missed opportunity
To take on someone who could make our Big 3 a Big 4 and really commit to a “win at all costs” strategy that seemed to be the goal when they didn’t trade Jamison. The whole “pick a direction” criticism is at the core of my problems with the last two days, and whether Rubio was there or not doesn’t really change that. Miller and Foye aren’t really much of a splash at all. It’s getting better, but marginally and not while really taking a risk. It’s also particularly annoying that they did it before they knew how the draft would shake out.
If we sign Gortat, it only slightly alleviates the larger problem of not really picking a direction. That is, unless we use Miller’s expiring at the deadline along with other pieces to get somebody. But there are probably fewer somebodies out there than there were now.
Again, the whole “competing while maintaining flexibility” thing annoys me. The best way to save the team’s budget long-term is to either go all out to win or go all out to sell (e.g. trade Jamison for cap relief). Doing a combination of both accomplishes neither goal.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I don't exclusively blame EG for that
I think we have to be careful there. There are many voices in the front office and I’d guess they are conflicting at this point. While EG is the fall guy because he’s the GM, I think this lack of direction is as a result of multiple forces (Abe, Abe’s health, the uncertainty post-Abe, the finance people, the basketball people, etc).
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One question I have been meaning to ask
does Leonsis own the option to buy the Wizards after Abe passes away? (Not that I hope this happens.)
I will now go knock on some wood for Abe’s health
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can see that
I’m just not sure that the Wizards had the assets to acquire players of a better caliber without including Butler. And yes, I have seen you poin’t on both the VC and Jefferson trade in that both teams got those stars for less. But the point remains in that the Wizards have teams seemingly back out of every deal if they won’t include Butler.
Now whether we wanted to include Butler or not is a different question altogether…
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We also don't know who backed out of a Butler deal
Other than Phoenix.
Nor do we know whether that fifth pick would have gained enough value if Rubio kept sliding. There’s a lot of talk about what would have happened if that asset lost value, but what happened if it gained value. I know I wrote that the best time to use the pick was before it was made, but that holds all the way up to draft day.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mr. Prada I respect your acumen but I have to respectfully disagree...
Of course young players are important, and In this past season was very frustrated when our young guys didn’t play. However, that doesn’t change the fact that for the most part experienced vets make title contenders.
Look at the starting line up of the Lakers. The weak point was Bynum, as talented as he may be, who was in his 3rd (?) year. The rest of the roster was very experienced. Look at Orlando, with the exception of Courtney Lee they were experienced vets. They just traded Lee to get better.
As far as it goes would I have rather gotten VC than what we got. Absolutely, but I think they got much more in the deal than we gave Minnesota. They got two rotation players and no Etan contract.
I think the real issue here is whether you think Rubio is going to be all that. I think it is unlikely, obviously most of the people on this board disagree. Time will tell.
by NeverNervousPervis on Jun 26, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that Rubio doesn't fit the timeline
But then you draft him and keep his rights, which won’t go down in value and won’t cost you anything on your cap. There’s going to be a lot more demand for Rubio than Juan Carlos Navarro — the situations are not comparable in any way.
Then, you still can get a better player, veteran or not.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But then
you’re essentially trying to upgrade the team with only Songalia, Pech and Etan and one of those players we have been attempting to unload for years. I just don’t see it. I completely agree that we should have waited longer to pull the trigger. But the flexibility of trading a pick rather than a person was what EG was attempting to maximize on….
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The assumption is that you don't make the Minnesota trade
So you still have James, Etan, Nick, Dray, Blatche, Critt, Rubio’s rights and McGee to trade for something good. That’s a lot of assets.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
again I get that
but are we overvaluing those assets? The one assett that everyone seemed to be pursuing fervently was the #5 pick, so my assumption is that there was an attempt to extract max value from that piece while shedding unwanted contracts…
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seems hard to believe we're overvaluing those so much
When you see what Vince and RJeff were dealt for the other day.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but you yourself
don’t think much of Richard Jefferson, and those contracts that were trade were in part non-guaranteed.
as for VC, I think there is a diversity of opinion on Lee’s game and the value of that particular player.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
Said Blatche twice.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its also a stretch
to assume that Rubio would have fallen to us if we had not traded with the Wolves. If they were that desperate to acquire him, they might have been willing to sacrifice other pieces to obtain a pick in the top 4.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are sort of missing the point, and then you contradict yourself
First, the comparison is not Rubio vs. Miller and Foye. The comparison is Miller and Foye vs. Rubio and whoever else the Wizards could have obtained is exchange for Etan’s expiring contract (and Songalia and Pech).
Second, you are correct that to compete for a championship, you need amazing talent. Rubio has a chance to be that amazing talent. He could be a bust, but so far the kid has been a prodigy. Why not roll the dice with that?
by disgrunted on Jun 26, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
probably b/c we rolled the dice w/kwame and that obviously turned out great
by theintz on Jun 26, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kwame is not Rubio
EG is not MJ.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rubio is 18 and years from being anything significant...
If he materializes into anything at all. His clips look fun but he is not coming in with an NBA body. IMHO Rubio isn’t Kobe, Garnett, McGrady, LeBron etc.
But that’s just my opinion. YMMV
by NeverNervousPervis on Jun 26, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think theintz’s point is that the Wizards’ organization may feel that they took such a chance with Kwame, and it flopped, and they don’t have the guts to try again. Maybe. That’s an interesting take. But if true, then we can only expect safe moves from now on. Resigning Arenas and Jamison last summer fit into that “safe” mode.
by disgrunted on Jun 26, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope that's not true
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think so
Ernie wasn’t around when Kwame was picked and it seems like he’s making the decisions, not Abe. So if he’s gun shy its for a different reason.
by hotplate on Jun 26, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, how about this...
All the significant “balance of power” transactions involved proven players not Rookies. Does anybody here honestly think that Rubio will significantly impact Minnesota’s record next year?
For that matter assuming Gil is healthy would he have gotten significant minutes here that would have allowed him to develop?
by NeverNervousPervis on Jun 26, 2009 11:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why is only next year the relevant question?
And as Caron said the other day, with a high pick you don’t worry about position; you pick the best player like they did in Miami when they picked Wade. (And like Portland didn’t with Bowie.)
by disgrunted on Jun 26, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
EXACTLY
And Blair was the best on the board.
by Unkle Wheez on Jun 26, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Somehow, we've all forgotten that Rubio was a major player on his team in the best European league in the world
At age 18. We also forget how he played in the Olympics.
He could definitely play a role next year if he were to come over. The only real issue with his game short-term is whether he comes over in the first place.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coming Over
If he doesn’t come over, its because he’s not satisfied that Minny’s a big enough market. So they trade him to a team with a big market. Who loses? That’s not a rhetorical question, it’s a genuine question. If we had drafted Rubio @ 5, and he had opted not to come to us (would DC have satisfied his big market criterion better than Minny?), would a Rubio who would only play for a big market team be less, equal, or more valuable than the 5 pick was two days before the draft when it was package to bring in Miller and Foye? I think there would be enough big market teams that would be interested and that would satisfy Rubio that we would still have substantial marketing power and a bidding war would still ensue.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Team That Drafts Him Loses
So they trade him to a team with a big market. Who loses?
Please explain what leverage a team has when trading a player that does not want to play for them? Pretty hard to play hardball with other GMs when walking away from the table is never an option.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Points to Be Made
The jist of my criticism is pretty much as the same after the Minnesota trade on Tuesday: you can’t have it both ways. The Wizards are already tax payers and their owner has said he desperately wants a championship. That’s going to cost you money, unfortunately, even in this climate. Either you need to be a buyer, in which case you explore every possible avenue you can to upgrade your on-court product, even if it means taking on more long-term money, or you need to be a seller, where you’re rebuilding and retooling at the expense of not competing. You can’t be both.
Thanks aren’t always so black and white, especially when you are spending someone else’s money. It is obvious to me that Ernie needs to make a trade and add an MLE free agent to balance out the roster. We are already over the tax. Every dollar we spend for the MLE will cost Abe two. By selling the second round pick for millions of dollars, we save Abe a lot of money and make paying the MLE a little easier to swallow. You can go into the luxury tax without being all Isaiah Thomas about it.
I love Blair, but he cannot fill in at center. Neither can Blatche, Antawn, nor JaVale (despite his height). I have a strong feeling that Ernie will focus on at least two bigs with both height and width in the coming weeks. And he is going to use the money he saved by selling the 32 to help offset that cost.
The Rubio thing is particularly ridiculous for two reasons. First, he carries a lot of trade value, and second, even if he does stay in Spain as rumored, you still hold his draft rights, don’t have to pay him (keep in mind part of the motivation of swapping 5 for Foye/Miller was that the latter two have shorter contracts that the #5) and, assuming you really believe a rookie won’t help you much anyway, you don’t have to actually give him minutes. There’s a no-lose to drafting Rubio, even if he doesn’t turn out to be as good as advertised.
With all due respect, Mike, that is complete BS. If Rubio goes back to Spain, then the whole thing is a complete catastrophe. We can’t afford to waste an asset like the #5 pick on a guy that can’t help you win now, when you are committed to winning now. Antawn has got three years left on his contract and then he is done. Caron may not be resignable after two seasons. And you think it is OK to make no trade and let your only asset sit in Europe for two years while he grows up and learns how to not be such a selfish prima donna? Mike Miller and Randy Foye are infinitely better (literally) than a big fat zero. And that is what you risk when you take an immature brat like Rubio (“Gee, I don’t know, my mom hates cold weather.”) Let the rebuilding teams deal with those childish games, we simply don’t have the time.
Staying stuck in the middle means you take on the first trade you can think of for your #5 pick that allows you to accomplish your divergent goals instead of waiting on draft day when a guy like Vince Carter is available for expiring contracts and comparable young talent (Our expirings=more $ than Orlando’s expirings and #5 is as least equal to Lee)…
Vinsanity is a great player, but can he really mesh with Gilbert? You had him subjectively ranked 7th on your list of ideal backcourt mates, and Mike Miller 3rd. So we get Mike Miller and Randy Foye and now you are saying you want Vince Carter? It seems to me you are letting your emotions override your objective judgement. We don’t need an All-Star team to win a championship. There is only one ball. We need guys that can mesh with others and come together as a better team for it. So in that regard, I would much rather have Mike Miller than Vince Carter, and so would you when you are thinking more clearly.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 11:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry About the Tone
It read much harsher than I intended.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree on all counts
By selling the second round pick for millions of dollars, we save Abe a lot of money and make paying the MLE a little easier to swallow. You can go into the luxury tax without being all Isaiah Thomas about it.
I love Blair, but he cannot fill in at center. Neither can Blatche, Antawn, nor JaVale (despite his height). I have a strong feeling that Ernie will focus on at least two bigs with both height and width in the coming weeks. And he is going to use the money he saved by selling the 32 to help offset that cost.
I’d much rather be able to use the full MLE on a vet then have us use our #32 pick, then cheap out and not be able to sign anyone for more then the vet minimum.
Lets see what transpires throughout free agency before we call this a disaster. I was upset when we passed on Blair, but there must be a reason for it. If we can add a couple big men with experience, we are in business to compete in the East. While we do have holes to fill in the front court, our overall roster is pretty potent. I’m confident Ernie sees this and will make future moves to balance the roster.
If Rubio goes back to Spain, then the whole thing is a complete catastrophe. We can’t afford to waste an asset like the #5 pick on a guy that can’t help you win now, when you are committed to winning now.
Dead on that if we picked Rubio and found out he was going to Spain for two years it would be a disaster. We need to win now. How does an overseas trade chip help us win now more then two established NBA player? There is also no guarantee that Rubio would have even been available at #5 had we stayed put.
There is only one ball. We need guys that can mesh with others and come together as a better team for it. So in that regard, I would much rather have Mike Miller than Vince Carter, and so would you when you are thinking more clearly.
More good points. I don’t see Carter fitting in all that well with a healthy big three. Who knows if he stays motivated while receiving the least amount of shots in his career? I’m good with Miller and Foye.
by DT711 on Jun 26, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I think people are getting too emotional
Miller was clearly one of the best compliments to Gil according to Prada’s article. He may not be as talented as Vince, but I would actually take Miller and Foye for more than $3 million less any day of the week. Plus they’re both great trade chips while Vince is almost unmovable. Also, I don’t remember us having the option to trade Etan/Songaila/Pech/#5 for Vince. I remember that we were talking to about 10 teams and they were giving us crap deals. Apparently we took the best offer. I think a lot of teams were trying to fleece us because they knew we were facing the luxury tax and didn’t particularly want the #5.
I would have loved Rubio, but he simply wouldn’t have had the impact of Miller AND Foye. At least not over the next couple of seasons. Our team depth is now one of the most outstanding in the league IMO. Flip utilizes 8-9 player rotations and our team has 12 quality players. Our only player that is not a viable option is Mike James and he is still a quality NBA player on the right roster and he has that pretty expiring contract. I’m sure that EG can consolidate (that’s my word to for the summer 09 Wiz if you look at most of my posts) some of these players into roster upgrades. Right now, I feel we have 6-8 players in our rotation locked down (Gil, Miller, Caron, Antawn, Haywood, Foye, maybe McGuire & McGee). I’m sure we can turn Young, Crittenden, Blatche, Stevenson, and James into a true impact big man.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you about Miller AND Foye having greater immediate impact (which is obvious), but my buddy is real angry because Miller will only be here for one year, whereas Rubio would be on our team for a long time, so we basically chose to have Foye over Rubio for the long haul.
What of this assessment? I didn’t know how to defend my positioning. :) Perhaps he’s right.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Miller and/or Foye can be here long-term
This is the great thing about our situation. We’re almost on a lease-to-buy plan with this team. Right now, we have Haywood, Miller, and James set to expire. These guys salaries will total more than $22 million. That is more than enough to re-sign Haywood and Miller next summer. They will know that they are the 4th and 5th men on a championship contending team and will be 30. If we are where we want to be at the end of the year, pay the men to extend the window.
If we look up in January or February to clearly be the 3rd, 4th or 5th seed, we can move Miller/James/Foye as necessary with our other prospects or potentially, one of the big three in order to make a power move.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
in fact
I think it could be argued that if we hadn’t traded with the wolves, they would have made another move to vault us and take Rubio anyway.
according to every rumour, they were desperately trying to come to terms with memphis and memphis kept insisting on the 5 and 6. Who knows if the 6 and Foye would have been enough to get it done. I just don’t see Rubio slipping to us if Memphis had retained all its assets on draft night.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To DT
The whole thing is not a catastrophe or a disaster if Rubio “goes back to Spain.” First, Rubio is balking at playing in a small market. Solution…ship him to a big market club. Who the hell would want that guy? Who wouldn’t! I can’t think of a single major market team that wouldn’t want Rubio. The trade demand for the pick should Rubio decide not to play for the Wizards would still dwarf the trade demand that the #5 pick commanded two days before the draft when it was unclear who would be available at that spot.
How would the Rubio pick help us win now? Either he plays for us and helps us now, or we trade him for some vets who help us now.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you are still under the false assumption
that Rubio would have dropped to us if we has stood pat. I disagree, the Wolves were pulling out EVERY stop to draft him. You’re also assuming that EG wanted Rubio and not someone like say James Harden.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
False assumption
First, you’re assuming that my assumption is a false one while criticizing the fact that I’m making an assumption, which smacks of hypocrisy. You seem to be speaking from certainty in your assumption, so why not share the basis for your certainty that A. T’Wolves were pulling out all stops to acquire Rubio and B. Rubio would not have fallen to 5 if we’d kept the pick. Who would the T’Wolves have traded with? They would have had 6, 18, and 28 I believe.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and Foye and Miller
As for the Wolves trying to trade up….it was reported on just about every news source, including BF.
I just think its presumptous to think that A) Rubio would have fallen when he was so coveted by one team (which is an assumption) and B) EG would have picked him in the first place.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who the hell would want that guy? Who wouldn’t!
Apparently the four teams, three if you take out LAC, who passed on him wouldn’t.
by DT711 on Jun 26, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Consider
Who the hell would want that guy? Who wouldn’t!
The Memphis Grizzlies, Oklahoma Thunder, and Sacramento Kings (despite desperately needing a point guard) did not want Rubio, and now Minnesota is discovering why. The kid is fickle and immature. Nobody wants to invest heavily in a player that can’t even make up his mind whether or not he wants to play in the NBA. And I’m glad we don’t have to deal with that mess.
Ernie fleeced Memphis with JCN, and now it is looking like he is going to fleece Minnesota with Rubio.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How?
Isn’t a Rubio that won’t play for the Wolves is still valuable as a trade chip to one of the bigger market teams that Rubio would be willing to play for?
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ifs
1. If the Wolves don’t trade up
2. If EG drafted Rubio and not one of the guys he worked out or scouted
3. If someone else didn’t make an offer that OKC or SAC liked more (and liked Rubio)
thats a lot of ifs
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm Not Sure the Big Market Teams are Going to Offer a Lot
Why would they? They have all of the leverage, Rubio has already hinted he doesn’t want to play for the Wolves. Besides, the big market GMs are probably looking at all of the immature comments and wondering what Rubio will do if everything doesn’t work out like he planned. What if he doesn’t get as many minutes as he wants? What if the team sucks worse than he thought? What if his mom thinks one of those cities is too cold? What if he decides he won’t make enough money as a #5 pick to offset his insane buyout? What if he is culture shocked and misses home?
Juan Carlos Navarro gave the NBA one season and then found that it wasn’t to his liking. Rubio could easily do the same, assuming he gives it even one season. Every big market GM is probably looking at that example and thinking twice.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
About this Big Market debate
Basically, what I’m taking from the conversation is that our list of potential buyers for the #5 would have been cut down to a handful of teams that are bigger markets than us. He expressed interest in big markets or Cali. Clippers and Kings passed on him. Lakers aren’t making that move. Bulls already have PG of the future. Nets have Devin Harris. So who are our big market candidates? Knicks? Maybe Golden State? Golden State is more focused on a PF. So we’d be left dealing Rubio to the knicks for Larry Hughes and Jordan Hill.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I just think this argument from both sides is breaking down
On one side you have
1. I wanted Rubio.
2. No really. I wanted Rubio
3. We didn’t maximize our assets.
On the other side you have
1. Maybe we took the best offer on the table. Maybe.
I fall into this second side because IF I am going to sleep at night and remain a Wizards fan, you have to assume that EG shopped around his expirings on their own merits. If those expirings were enough to net VC or RJ or any of the other cap cutting team, they probably would have done. But they didn’t and were most likely asking for something much more substantial
I just think its hard to swallow that EG (who is not my favorite GM) was all ginned up (to use the President’s phrasing) to give away the #5 and expirings for the first deal that was placed in front of him.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also agree (and it did sound a little harsh) except for on blair somewhat
the whole “even if rubio stays overseas for two years we’re still better off” argument is lost on me. seems disproportionately biased for rubio. maybe if we hadn’t signed jamison… but we really can’t have it both ways like that at this point.
as i said elsewhere i am also not sold on VC being a better move.
to say we sold blair to sign an MLE is a bit off though. not sure we didn’t just sell blair. also we could have signed blair and signed an MLE if we wanted to pay. i didn’t realize we got 2.5 million for the pick, so i think that’s actually a good play by ernie, but i respect others who would have liked to have seen the wiz drop the coin and make both plays.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Point About Selling the Pick
Is that it is easy to say, “why doesn’t Abe just spend an extra $2.5 million and do the MLE deal anyway?” We are just fans, we don’t have to pay the invoice. We could just as easily say, “why doesn’t Abe spend as much money as Isaiah Thomas did for many years, that would definitely increase our chances of putting a contender out there!”
Abe is already committed to paying the tax, which he loathes doing. It is a bit much to ask that he go way over when he can save $2.5 million off of the bill.
And again, I’m sorry about the harshness. I was passionate when I wrote those words, and I should have worded them more carefully. I meant absolutely no disrespect to Prada.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
also note that by not paying blair you add another mill on there so it’s 3.5 million you can put elsewhere. like i said, with that amount of money, good play ernie. (who’s paying 2.5 million for second round picks?!?!?)
but we are in win now mode so i’m sympathetic to the other side of the argument.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Blair sale helps us sign an MLE
If we had drafted Blair and held onto him, it would have cost Abe almost $3.4 million this season. Approximately $450K in salary, $450K in luxury tax, and the $2.5 million that he wouldn’t have gotten from Houston. And that doesn’t include that Blair would cost almost $1.5 million next year because we’ll be in the luxury tax again. They say that Gortat is looking at somewhere above $3 million a year. That $3.4 million that Abe save/received in real life cash can cover the luxury tax cost on an MLE.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i already played both sides of the argument
and i’m on the fence on this one, i’m okay with ernie selling it for 2.5 mill, that’s a lot.
but we have yet to see if we even sign anyone… i’m not so sure we will. we’ll probably try to move salary rather than add…
i can understand people’s upsetness on that front is all i’m saying.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ernie said he wants to add a vet big man
Said it in the comcast interview linked below. Said he passed on the 2nd rounder and plans to sign a vet big who can compete for minutes.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sign could mean a lot of things
it might mean sign and trade by moving mike james’s contract. in that case, we just cut the cost of the lux tax by selling blair.
not that that’s entirely a bad thing.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But we would pick the luxury tax cost back up
to sign and trade involving mike james, we would have to take back almost as much salary and therefore would be still in the luxury tax. We’re not straddling the fence, we are way in the luxury tax. no matter how you slice it, Blair would’ve cost our team $3.4 million in real cash. Considering his height, athleticism and injuries, he wasn’t worth the cost.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He Wasn't Worth the Cost
To us and our unique set of needs. However, I think he is being way undervalued because of his knees and he could be the biggest sleeper in the draft.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry you lost me
if we keep our current roster count and just move a contract for a big man, then the blair sell-off doesn’t help us sign someone for the MLE by offsetting cost of that. it just helps us offset cost of our current lux tax situation.
sounds like you approve of that too, but that’s entirely different.
again i see your side of the argument. that’s a lot of $$.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not quite sure I understand the proposed situtation
But basically, that money saved on Blair will likely be taken into account as offsetting the luxury tax penalty of signing an MLE. So basically, we can now budget to pay another 1.7 million towards an MLE player because we saved 3.4 on Blair.
Same thing by trading the 5th pick. That saved us 6.3 million (3.16 in salary, 3.16 in luxury tax). The Wiz have saved $10 million in real cash by skipping out on the draft. That makes them more likely to shift that dough over to an MLE. Last year’s MLE was 5.8 million so if its the same or less this year, then a full MLE would cost us 11.6 million.
According to HoopsHype salaries, we saved about 700K on the 08-09 salary, about 200K in cash for 09-10 (100K in salary) totaling 900K saved over this past and upcoming seasons for the Miller/Foye trade. Couple that with saving 9.7 million by not drafting Rubio and Blair and we saved 10.6 million dollars in real cash. That’s $1 million less than the cost of a full MLE.
So basically these costs almost equal out in real cash:
Mike Miller + Randy Foye + Full MLE Big Man = Etan Thomas + Darius Songaila + Oleksiy Pecherov + Ricky Rubio + Dejuan Blair + $1 million
So as far as real contributions, we swapped Songaila/Rubio/Blair for the cost of Miller/Foye/Full MLE Big Man. I think the latter puts us closer to a championship.
And we still can have trade assets like Mike James and the youngsters.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm not sure you're listening
or i’m not being clear. but i’m done trying. i understand your point and i agree to an extent. you’re arguing that getting the cash is a good thing but i think you’re commingling several different go forward scenarios and calling them the same thing whereas i think the different go forward scenarios have different levels of ramifications toward calling the franchise cheap.
you seem to be fine with keeping our current lux tax penalty without raising it and using the blair sell off to reduce that cost. so you are on the most extreme side of “the getting the cash is good camp”. and that’s fine, it’s a fair point.
i was trying to dig into sublteties but i think it wasn’t worth it.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we understand each other, but aren't being direct enough
it seems to me that you are saying that drafting Blair and the money it saves shouldn’t affect the signing of an MLE player. I can understand that. But as someone else pointed out, there’s a difference between going into the luxury tax and just going plain Isaiah Thomas.
We’re in the luxury tax regardless and I think we have made moves that can better allocate the teams money. There is a certain budget for the team and that budget may account for the luxury tax, but there is a cut off. The Wiz are not in NYC or LA. We’re also not owned by Paul Allen. Abe is very wealthy, but he can only go in his pockets so deep. There has to be a bottom line for this company.
That’s where I’m saying that we have to be efficient with salaries and roster spots. We already have 13 players, we will probably sign an MLE big man, and Blair would have been the $3.4 million 15th man. He would have cost a lot to be the inactive last man on the bench with no height, explosiveness or knees.
Passing on him wasn’t a sign that we don’t want to win championships, it was fiscal responsibility.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i said i'd top trying to explain but can't help it
option 1 – don’t make any more moves.
option 2 – add a frontcourt player by swapping a backcourt player (or two) without adding any more salary to the franchise.
option 3 – sign an additional 14th player with the MLE (add salary)
option 4 – sign a 14th player with the MLE and keep the 2nd round pick (add a lot of salary) (no longer possible but there for comparison)
there are big differences in terms of “fiscal responsibility” between options 2 , 3, and 4.
i think most people would have been fine with option2 combined with keeping the second round pick. (why not take a chance?)
it would also be savvy if EG used the cash to pursue option 3.
but it’s just as likely he’ll do option 2 only and keep the blair cash to pay the lux tax, which i can understand people being bugged about that one.
i can’t tell if you’re already assuming ernie will do option 3 or if you’re fine with not adding salary and paying down the lux tax. i don’t think it’s safe to say we’ll definitely sign player #14 using the mle…
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 26, 2009 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My guess
Is that EG has been given a budget ceiling. If that is the case, then he is guessing that the $1,000,000/year + 2,500,000 could be spent on on someone better than Blair. Someone with less risk and someone who is better prepared to contribute for the next few years.
It’s an honest calculation on his part that can be agreed or disagreed with.
by MR on Jun 26, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll respond to Rubio separately in another post when I get a chance
(Though I’m going out of town this weekend). I really think a lot of people are misunderstanding the point there. The situation with Rubio is extremely complicated and boils down to Rubio’s need to be paid in order to help cover the cost of his ridiculous buyout. For Rubio’s career to be profitable, he has to make a big enough statement to be paid well on his second contract. To get a good second contract, it makes sense to want to direct him to somewhere with the best fit. It has nothing to do with him being a prima donna or anything of the sort. (Although I will say I don’t see what his problem with Minnesota is). There are teams where Rubio would have fit in excellently (at least on the court) that picked well below the Wizards (Golden State, Knicks, Milwaukee, Phoenix, Indiana, Philly, Atlanta and on down the line. Hell, Minnesota may have thrown in more picks to get the chance to move up for Rubio). Ernie could have been in the catbird seat on draft night sifting through those offers.
As far as selling the pick: I feel better about it today knowing that the Wiz got $2.5 million and not just 350k like they got with Walker. However, the Wizards must get someone worthwhile with that leftover money. If they don’t, it’s a total failure. And even so, it’s another case of favoring the sure thing of a vet, even if it costs more, to a rookie that costs less. That’s not as big a deal with the on-court product, but it’s still not great payroll management. You take the plunge with cheap youngsters and really develop them, you don’t have to sell picks for the bottom line.
Now, as for the Vince Carter argument. Cuppett, you really misread that post. It was not a straight list of who I would prefer all things equal. It was an exercise in seeing which player’s skill set complemented Gil’s the best. Those are nowhere near the same things. You must have missed this line after the list.
Remember, that’s in order of best fit to worst fit, not best player to worst player.
That’s really huge. Vince Carter is way better overall than Mike Miller. Mike Miller’s skill set may be a slightly better fit than Vince Carter’s (the difference between #3 and #7 on a list that included over 100 players is pretty tiny), but Vince Carter’s overall talent trumps that difference significantly. Talent is the major thing needed on this team. We have a lot of decent players, but our Big 3 simply isn’t good enough to compete with the best Big 3s unless Gil totally blows up. As I’ve said several times before, the Big 3 needed to become a Big 4. Vince would have made it a Big 4.
(As far as getting Miller + Foye, again, that doesn’t do much for me since there’s not enough time for both of those guys to play enough. Like I wrote when the trade happened, We’re now forced to make another trade to balance the roster, which depreciates the value of our assets. I’d have been happier getting one of Foye/Miller and giving up less (swapping picks instead of dealing them, keeping Songaila, etc). Preferably Miller to Foye).
Seriously, the Miller/Carter counterpoint you’re trying to make is a major misrepresentation. I won’t sit here for too long argue the merits of Carter because we’ll just have to agree to disagree on his on-court play. I think he gets a really bad rep for what happened in 2004 and for the Nets’ pitiful play recently. In fact, his situation reminds me a lot of Ray Allen’s in 2007; an outstanding shooting guard over 30 on a crappy team that can function very well on a good team, except everyone doesn’t realize it because he’s been stuck on a crappy team and is being blamed for it. The on-court price for Carter was pretty cheap — expiring deals, a decent young player or two. It’s worth it on the court for that price.
(As far as the financial stuff, that’s another response I’ll make down later. It really does come down to not picking a direction. Icantfeelmyface summed it up pretty well down there. My counter to his counter is, while I can’t speak for others, I would have respected the Wizards trading Jamison and beginning a rebuilding effort around Arenas and Butler because it would have signaled a clearer direction than we have right now).
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Don't Think I Misread it at All
Cuppett, you really misread that post. It was not a straight list of who I would prefer all things equal. It was an exercise in seeing which player’s skill set complemented Gil’s the best. Those are nowhere near the same things. You must have missed this line after the list.
I beg to differ. Here is what I said:
Vinsanity is a great player, but can he really mesh with Gilbert? You had him subjectively ranked 7th on your list of ideal backcourt mates, and Mike Miller 3rd.
Like I said, Vince is the better player, but I don’t think he is as good a fit with Gilbert as Mike Miller is, and your list shows that you agree with that.
Add to that Mike Miller will end up being cheaper when/if we resign him. And Vince will probably need the ball in his hands to be effective. Which leads me to your point here:
Talent is the major thing needed on this team. We have a lot of decent players, but our Big 3 simply isn’t good enough to compete with the best Big 3s unless Gil totally blows up. As I’ve said several times before, the Big 3 needed to become a Big 4. Vince would have made it a Big 4.
I couldn’t possibly disagree more. There is nothing wrong with any of our three All-Stars. Adding Vince turns us into a complete All-Star team, which is what we don’t need. Which is why I said:
We don’t need an All-Star team to win a championship. There is only one ball. We need guys that can mesh with others and come together as a better team for it.
Mike is a better fit because he can be a spot up three point specialist, when needed, and let Gil do most of the creating on offense. Vince would be a complete waste if we used him like that. He needs the ball. Gil needs the ball. Antawn and Caron will also need the ball sometimes. We don’t need any more huge talent and we don’t need any more innovators on offense. What we need are players that can fit into roles that this team needs to win.
If having the most All-Stars on a team guarantees victory, then how come our national team lost 3 out of the last 4 world championships to teams with mostly no-name players? You need guys who can play well together, not individually great players. Too many chiefs and not enough indians. Vince Carter would not be a better fit than what we have now. You showed that yourself, and I’m not misrepresenting that at all.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh
How do you explain Boston then? Three all-stars there too. The national team isn’t a good example because the international game is so different than the NBA. They also didn’t scout well enough, so they didn’t know anything about their opponents. Finally, it’s one and done there, not seven game series. Anything can happen in one game. I don’t think that’s an analagous situation.
Carter fits because he can pass and he can spot up, because he scores an above-average number of his points off assists. The numbers showed it. He’s not as good as Mike Miller in that regard, because of the usage, but he’s capable. It’s a matter of him accepting a secondary role, which is a concern but a fairly minor one. You think he won’t, I think he can. I think he took a major role on that Nets team because they had nobody else other than Harris. We do. And if Carter steals some of Butler’s and Jamison’s shots, that’s fine by me. I think the latter two can sacrifice.
You obviously need good fits, but you also need good talent. Vince Carter is a very talented player that fits in pretty well. Not as well as Mike Miller, and there are some concerns, but Vince “fits” in better than tons of fellow “all-stars,” including Joe Johnson, Ray Allen, Rip Hamilton, Josh Howard, Monta Ellis, Tracy McGrady, Kobe Bryant, Dwayne Wade, Michael Redd, Brandon Roy, Kevin Martin, Manu Ginobili and Kevin Durant. At least by my criteria.
The key is not juxtaposing talent vs. fit, it’s combining, weighing and balancing talent and fit.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
How do you explain Boston then? Three all-stars there too.
Doesn’t that support my side of the argument? You know, the side that says three All-Stars is enough? Since we already have three, and Boston proved you don’t need any more than that to win a championship, how does that example support your argument of adding a fourth All-Star to the mix? At some point, even you have to admit that adding too many high usage, high volume scorers becomes counter-productive. Boston got it done with three proven All-Stars and a bunch of role players. So didn’t the Lakers (actually, they did it with two proven All-Stars and Lamar Odom). So why can’t we?
The national team isn’t a good example because the international game is so different than the NBA. They also didn’t scout well enough, so they didn’t know anything about their opponents. Finally, it’s one and done there, not seven game series. Anything can happen in one game. I don’t think that’s an analagous situation.
No analogy is perfect, but the example fits better than you would like to admit. Before international competition was as good as it is now, it was simply enough to throw together the best player at each position and have them go at it. What we discovered was that a well-assembled team of complimentary players, despite being clearly inferior at each position, became more than good enough to beat a simple collection of talent. Great teams need guys that can step up when needed but also step back and fill niche roles. Do I need to list all of the role players that were crucial to each of the last championship teams? I think you can get the point without that. And I think you would be hard pressed to name a championship team that needed four All-Stars to get the job done.
Carter fits because he can pass and he can spot up, because he scores an above-average number of his points off assists. The numbers showed it. He’s not as good as Mike Miller in that regard, because of the usage, but he’s capable. … Vince Carter is a very talented player that fits in pretty well. Not as well as Mike Miller, and there are some concerns, …
Vince also costs a lot more money. And why go with capable when you can have the better player for that role for a lot less money and future investment (and a capable bench player as icing on the cake)? Mike, forgive me if I’m missing something here, but I am becoming very confused. A week and a half ago you wrote an excellent, well-researched article about who the best back court mate would be for Gilbert Arenas. The idea, I thought, was to put more intelligence into selecting the best shooting guard for our team rather than simply grabbing the best player available at that position, and in the process overpaying for that player for what we need him to do. I thought I understood it, and I thought it was a great endeavor.
But lo and behold, Ernie goes out and gets the 3rd best fit on your list, and now you are upset because he didn’t spend more money on the 7th best fit just because he was the best player available? If that is how you feel, then what was the point of that article anyway? I thought this particular line from that article very insightful:
Beyond that, it would be nice if the player didn’t create too many plays for himself and (assuming Arenas’ recovery allows him to drive the lane like before) shot mostly jumpers in order to improve the floor balance.
Excellent, I completely agree! But that must have been the Dr. Jekyll side of your mind, because now the Mr. Hyde side wants to spend $2 million more dollars ($4 million when you count the luxury tax) on one less player that does exactly what you said it wouldn’t be nice for our shooting guard to do.
It’s a matter of him accepting a secondary role, which is a concern but a fairly minor one. You think he won’t, I think he can.
It’s not that I don’t think he can, although that is of some concern, as you yourself said. My bigger point is that it would be a complete waste to ask him too! If you are trying to fill a job position of mid-level manager, you don’t go out and pay a Fortune 500 CEO! Vince Carter is way overqualified for what we need.
Plus, if we did get Vince Carter, what money would we have left for the bench? Remember, we got two solid guards for less than the price of a Vince Carter, and we still have the money, presumably, to go out and sign a much needed big man or two to fill another glaring need we have. If we blow Abe’s big wad of cash on Vince Carter, then what do we have left for that need, or for our bench?
And what about the future of our team after this next season? Mike Miller and Randy Foye both have expiring contracts, giving us a ton of flexibility. You know that vastly underrated center that plays for us, defending the paint and making our team a whole lot better when he is healthy and on the court? His contract expires after next season. He will probably want more than the $6 million per season he is making now. Probably a lot more. How exactly can we afford to resign him if we are committed to paying our overqualified shooting guard $17.5 million a year? We would probably lose Haywood, and then we could kiss our championship hopes goodbye.
And if Carter steals some of Butler’s and Jamison’s shots, that’s fine by me.
…
but Vince "fits" in better than tons of fellow "all-stars," including …
Does Vince fit in better than the “fellow all-stars” already on our team? Wouldn’t it be a bit redundant to pay a player extra money to do what can be done by the players we already have?
I really think you’ve stretched yourself thin on the whole Vince Carter argument.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
upset about missing on a chance to get rubio i understand, but i was surprised to see mike so upset about not doing a VC move.
although having VC and jamison (and haywood!) on the same team would have been fun from a sentimental standpoint (weren’t they traded for one another on draft day?). and the wiz would have gotten a lot of national love from the media/nba fans, really not sure we would have been better off in the short or the long term from a pure basketball perspective versus what we did, even if we could have gotten VC for the same price, and even if VC only had one year left on his deal.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 28, 2009 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
take it easy on Abe
Take it easy on Abe. Though he has not won much, it is primarily the result of excessive loyalty, which you may not appreciate as a sports fan. But there are a lot of good people unemployed by lesser owners. Plus, he built the stadium on his own dime and personally resurrected the entire experience.
Having said that, he is older and ill. I think you can forget about anything but a keep the cup full and do our best approach until the team passes to Leonsis. Ted will blow the team up and start over. But it won’t happen before then. We will probably not keep any more draft picks going until Abe passes the baton to Ted.
So with that in mind, I do not think it is surprising what they are doing. The team is better in the short run with the trade. And I was surprised and disappointed on not drafting the Pittsburgh rebounding machine. But it is very unlikely he would have put them over the top.
They need two big men- legitimate ones. Guys with size, not string beans. We have to go through Shaq and Howard to win because we match up well with Boston already. Rasheed Wallace is a definite must have because he can play D and is one of only a couple big men that can score on their own. He might be the only one available us, but Cleveland really needs him for the same reason. Let’s hope Flip’s relationship is good! They can trade some contracts and guards to free up the space. He is a MLE signing.
The other guy is Verejao. If we want to win, it is not enough to get better. We have to hurt those we have to go through. He is not the best. But he is a scrapper in the paint and picks up every loose ball inside. He is the guy that does the little things that their old centers don’t, and really makes their team better.
If that fails, the other pickup should be a contract offer on Gortat to force Orlando to sign him or Hedo. We don’t want them to have both. And even with V Carter, they are better with Hedo. They won’t win it with Vince and after losing their guards and Hedo.
If both those fail, then Camby or one of the others discussed. But the best team we could realistically put forward would be with rasheed and varejao because Orlando probably will not keep both Gortat and Hedo.
We know the bullets will sign at least one more big. Judge this draft if they go the extra mile and get two legitimate big men. Then it will be a great draft considering their direction. It will take two to win. So if not, everybody is right and they aren’t serious enough.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 12:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think we need a backup center more than a PF
I don’t think we get Sheed because he’s going to want to start. Who does he start over? Maybe Haywood, but then kiss him goodbye next summer because we know how he feels about coming off the bench. I think that people are right in saying that we need someone to help out on Shaq and Dwight. McGee is the future to me, but he can’t match up with the big fellas right now. I was throwing Camby out there because I think he can be a great mentor and trade asset with his expiring contract. But now, I’m leaning more towards someone like Gortat (but it doesn’t have to be specifically him). We need someone who doesn’t mind being the backup and can be a defensive/rebounding presence and bang down low.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But didn't you see those McGee workout videos?
He’s getting HUGE! :p
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what does that mean- 215? LOL
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
rasheed would start at 4 and jamison off the bench…if that is a requirement. who cares… they whole team just about plays multiple positions. there will be a lot of different looks and minutes to go around. i think they aggressively sign brendon and we are year to year with the complimentary players any ways. if only he would stop blogging and develop a knock down go to move! it is a shame he is so aloof and not committed. but he is still a 30yo man in the paint. so he will cost some $$$.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sheed is 34 soon to be 35 and completely zoned out. He isn’t worth the MLE.
by Fundefined on Jun 26, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Sheed doesn’t give a rat’s ass. Never has. As Barkley says, he could have been one of the league’s best.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not Sheed
I thought we wanted a banger! Rasheed averaged 7 rebounds but just 0.8 offensive rebounds per game. Plus he average almost 5 three point shots per game. I don’t think he qualifies as a rugged inside banger. I prefer McDyess by a lot!
by hotplate on Jun 26, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
find me a MLE that can score more than a put back. he can pull people out of the paint too. he is a head case. but that is what you get when you try to win a championship without a superstar and your best player is a combo guard who cant guard.
his offensive game is very valuable to free up space on the perimeter. otherwise, shaq and howard will clog the middle and everyone else will smother our shooters. and you dont win in the nba playoffs outside 12-25 feet. orlando had the best setup and was toasted.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We really don’t need his offensive game. We have Antawn, who’s game is very similar in that he’s a inside-out big man.
by Fundefined on Jun 26, 2009 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
antawn cant be paired against shaq/howard
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They need two big men- legitimate ones. Guys with size, not string beans. We have to go through Shaq and Howard to win because we match up well with Boston already. Rasheed Wallace is a definite must have because he can play D and is one of only a couple big men that can score on their own. He might be the only one available us, but Cleveland really needs him for the same reason. Let’s hope Flip’s relationship is good! They can trade some contracts and guards to free up the space. He is a MLE signing.
The other guy is Verejao. If we want to win, it is not enough to get better. We have to hurt those we have to go through. He is not the best. But he is a scrapper in the paint and picks up every loose ball inside. He is the guy that does the little things that their old centers don’t, and really makes their team better.
There is absolutely no way that the Wizards will be able to sign both Rasheed Wallace and Anderson Varejao. None.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why not? the economy is terrible and salaries will come down this year. Heck, even the Redskins are offering 40% off some ticket sales. why do you think all the moster stars are being traded for notta? You know better than me, but I thought they had the capability to send a couple back up guards for one $5mm contract and sign a MLE for another $5mm. But you see they want expiring/near expiring contracts to roll off so they can resign BH and CB next year. The list of eligible players will have their contracts expire in the next two years or can be signed for about that long. Whoever they sign just needs to be closer to 300lbs than 200lbs.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Wizards have the MLE
That’s it. They may not even spend it. That’s enough for one, maybe, but no way both.
Both those guys are free agents, so there’s no points to trade for them.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget
Wiz are over the luxury tax. That means a $5M MLE signing costs them $10M in real dollars. NOT happening.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More cap ignorance from me, but ..
Isn’t the point of the MLE that it DOESN’T count against the cap – so we could use it and not pay luxury tax on it?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Salary Cap is Different Than Luxury Tax Threshold
The MLE allows for a team already over the salary cap ($55.63 million for last season) to sign one free agent despite this. The luxury tax is another ball of wax. It’s threshold is higher ($71.15 million last season), but there is no getting around it. No matter what cap exception you use, or how many players you have on your roster, you will pay $1 for every dollar you go over that threshold.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lets not get carried away
I don’t think VC would have helped much(no defense, hurt alot, needs the ball) and he makes 33 mill over the next 2 seasons making it tougher to get another piece or re-sign Haywood. Plus NJ got a much better deal than we can offer. I would rather have had Courtney Lee(cheap guy who will start for 10 years and play good defense and be a solid 3rd or 4th offensive option). We obviously had no shot at getting Amare either. As for Rubio if Minny wanted him they easily could have traded up to #3 with some combo of the 6 and 18. Sam presti loves assets and he could have moved back to 6 and been pretty much guaranteed to get either Harden or Curry. So I don’t think its safe to assume that we would have had Rubio. Lets see if EG can get a quality Big-man somehow. Plus we still have Mike Miller to trade in February if we need a different piece. EG has to do something big to justify selling our second rounder IMO.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 26, 2009 12:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ernie
I must say I am always confused with what ernie does. His draft selections in the past have not been great. Here he is talking about what they did last night. What do you think???
www.comcastsportsnet.tv/pages/inner_player?vidID=vidcast_10181&feedID=257&startclip=1
by redrockin on Jun 26, 2009 12:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh Ernie...
Didn’t really want Rubio anyways, it seems. Do I believe him? Yeah, I do. It’s what he said all along – this draft really was a one-man draft as far as immediate impact. Obviously, as we’ve seen, Ernie isn’t looking for a player that becomes good in 2-3 years. “The time is now” sort of thing. We knew he was going to get rid of the pick if we didn’t get the #1 spot. And I see where he’s coming from.
He obviously wants to stack this team up with veterans. Another veteran is coming to fill that spot. He’s right that nobody would have really given us immediate impact in the 2nd round – Blair is a medical mystery. It looks like he could be a Millsap type of player, but are his knees good? Should we have taken that gamble?
I’m very interested to see how this team plays together next year.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Think Ernie
Has learned his lesson from Spanish guards testing the NBA waters. As much as everyone kept telling me that Rubio is completely different from JCN, it sure looks to me that he is following the same track that JCN took. I want to pick and choose the team I play for, and if it doesn’t work out for any reason, I’ll just take my ball and go back home to Spain.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Che sarà, sarà
What will be, will be. Despite my outrage at EG, the only thing we can do now is support the team we’ve got and pray that he has a plan. unless someone here can convince polin to fire him, we’ve just gotta hope this year is different and he can get it done.
by Fire Ernie on Jun 26, 2009 12:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ernie doesn’t deserve to be fired… yet. This year is going to determine a lot.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I cannot BELIEVE
that the Celtics traded the #5 pick for Ray Allen!!! His ankles are made out of fiberglass, he is washed up!!! God, I hate this team!! They have sucked for so long. Now we have stupid fat Kendrick Perkins, Mr. Broken Ankles, and a Paul Pierce who was hurt for most of the year!!
I hate this team. Ainge needs to die! Like now!
Oh….wait.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 12:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's a decent point...
…but Ray Allen is one of the best shooters ever to play the game. Miller isn’t. :) But your point is a good one: that’s what some Celtics fans were saying about the move.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too clever by half
For starters…We don’t have the pieces for a Kevin Garnett-type trade or anything near it (Mike James +Nick Young…HA) Add to that the fact that Mike Miller and Randy Foye are nowhere near as talented as Ray Allen.
If you ignore those two facts, then your analogy/attempt at humor is spot on
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't that what allows die-hard Bullets fans to sleep at night?
By ignoring the facts?
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually think we got more for less
The Celtics got an old Ray Allen and Big Baby (a 2nd round rookie at the time) for Delonte West, Wally, and Jeff Green. Allen was a one year purchase. His legs were done last postseason. That’s why he couldn’t hit his jumper and they tried to move him this summer.
We got Mike Miller at 29 so he has a few years left and Randy Foye coming off a breakout season and in his prime at 26. Yes we gave up Rubio, but he might not ever wear a Timberwolves uniform. Other than that we gave up Etan, Songaila and Pech. That is nowhere near the value of Delonte West and Wally.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Value
Etan and Pech’s value was not in their skill level, it was in their being the recession-gold of expiring contracts. To those who point out that our team got better in the Miller/Foye trade, nobody is disputing that. It’s beside the point. The Grizzlies got better by picking Hasheem Thabeet. Its how far short the actual benefit was of the potential benefits that matter.
For Rubio and the 9 million dollars of expiring contracts of Thomas and Pech we could have done better. If theres any doubt, check the list of transactions for the past week, and see if we didn’t have just as if not more compelling packages to put together for the stars that were traded. Thats ignoring the stars that were not dealt, but were offered on a silver platter. Check around at the list of teams that were shopping their big contracts.
Its not what we got vs. what we had. Its what we got vs what we could have gotten.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its not freaking Rubio!
There is no guarantee there! That is such a hindsight 20/20 statement.
We have attempted to trade Etan 10 bajillion times and NO ONE bit. No one. If he he is “recession gold” then why did he prove so impossible to trade until we added a sweetner!?
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because before now
he hasn’t been an expiring contract!
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
with a trade kicker
and a heart condition.
I’m not buying it.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ben Wallace's expiring contract
15 million over 1 yr, guys nothing any more, might even be retiring before the season begins. A team thats cutting salary isn’t thinking of the talent of the expiring contract. They are thinking of the free agents they can bring in the summer of the 2010 once the salary of that expiring contract drops off the payroll. A lot of expiring contracts barely play at all for the teams that acquire them. Its strictly for salary cap purposes.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ben Wallace was an example of the value of expiring contracts
Didn’t make that clear
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
which acquired
an over the hill Shaq.
I get what you are saying, but teams target what they want out of a particular trading partner and target in on it.
For the Wizards, fair or unfair, its give me the #5 or Caron Butler.
Thats the basis of most of the deals that teams approach us with.
I don’t like EG, but I think its ridiculous to assume that he hasn’t attempted to trade Thomas/Pech on the basis of their expiring contract status.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wally Sczerbiak Was Another Example of the Value of Expiring Contracts
And that got the Cavaliers what, exactly? Bitter disappointment at the trade deadline.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Umm, about those expirings
Miller (9.75) and Foye (3.58) count for more than $13 million in expirings if we choose to use them in that capacity. Etan and Pech counted for about $9 million in expiring salary. Etan’s kicker was mean too. He’s getting like $12 million from Minnesota. Miller and Foye’s contracts are more valuable than those other deals, plus the teams can get a quality player in that roster spot until the deal expires. We could keep Foye and trade Miller and would still have more value in expirings than previously.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and Ben Wallace
Has more value as an expiring because he’s likely to retire. His salary then wouldn’t count for 09-10. Same with Pavlovic. He has a 4.9 mil salary but is only guaranteed $1 million if he gets released.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so
when the Celtics
1) Missed out on Durant/Oden
2) Traded for a banged up Allen who was turning the ripe old age of 31
they wern’t jumping out of trees?
I never suggested that we were picking up KG. But everyone needs to chill before the dust settles.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you cant even begin to compare us to boston. they won a championship and would have repeated this year if garnett did not go down. regardless, the banner is hanging. we are trying to get past the first round in the playoffs. and if we get two solid beefy players, our kids improve, avoid inopportune injuries and learn how to play team defense, and the current top teams do not improve any more from this point, we might have a shot. there are a lot of ifs in there.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes I can
how many wins did they have before they pulled off those two trades? how many years of mediocrity was that team mired in?
as I remember, even AFTER Garnett, the question was who the hell was going to play around them after they shipped EVERYONE else out the door? Well veterans signed and Rondo happened to be steady enough to not screw it all up. I think if you go back and look at the post Garnett trade articles, you will see there were just as many “who plays with these guys” articles as "OMG championship.
AND how many regular season wins did the 2007-08 Wizards have against that championship Celtics team?
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, ledell, you're proving my point for me
They took a chance and cashed in their major assets all at once. They committed to a clear course of action and reaped the benefits. If it didn’t work, they at least committed 100% to their stated goal of winning now.
Our cupboard isn’t as bare as the Celtics’ was then, so even if the end result is Vince Carter and, say, Elton Brand (I dunno, thinking out loud, you could go pretty far down with a power forward), it’s still a serious win-now commitment that I could have respected. Maybe it crashes and burns, but it’s still truthfully going for it.
AND how many regular season wins did the 2007-08 Wizards have against that championship Celtics team?
Yay regular season!
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My point Mike
is that it was a two pronged move. Everyone and the mother was flipping out when they traded for Allen. Everyone. They cashed in the #5 and a starting PG (a guy that you like) and came up with a guy who a lot of people thought was on his last legs.
My argument is that Delonte West + #5 in a strong draft is a hell of a lot better than crappy PF’s and #5 in a weak draft.
Point two – yes they cashed in ALL their assets. So we need to be willing to expand our thinking on what assets are. If I remember the trade rumblings at the time, anyone but Jefferson was untouchable. If we opened up our consideration of what an asset is (and include Blatche or even Jamison and Butler) we could do the EXACT same type of trade.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
I’ll gladly eat crow if we maximize our assets like you say (for the record, I’m in favor of a Butler for Bosh swap. If we get Bosh for Butler + Blatche + James, I am getting full off crow).
I just don’t see it coming.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither do I
and that sucks.
But I prefer to hold out hope, until the season starts.
I just think there is a difference is saying we didn’t do all we could on June 26th. KG was traded for on August 1st. Lets just all take a breath before we have an embolism.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that is what ted will do, not abe. unfortunately, and i wish him well, abe’s health is not so good. he is not breaking things up and starting over when he doesn’t even know if he will survive the season. i really do not think it is an option, and it is one reality that ernie has to work around.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and my point about the regular season
is that an inferior Wizards team without Arenas could beat supposedly the best team in the NBA. Why? Because we matched up well with them?.They couldn’t run with us. Which is the same problem they had keeping up with Chicago.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yay Matchups!
Yay regular season!
Ledell makes a much better point than you give him credit for. Once you make it to the playoffs, you need to be able to match up well against your potential opponents. Was the regular season result between Orlando and Cleveland irrelevant to the playoffs? Was the regular season result between Dallas and Golden State irrelevant two seasons ago?
Ledell’s point was that we were equipped well-enough to beat Boston even before our trade. Now you can argue that we are even better equipped. Considering Boston is a likely playoff opponent, that matters.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and that team was beset
by just as many ifs
is Eddie House washed up?
can Rajon Rondo play good point?
will Perkins develop into a serviceable center?
will we get any production from our bench?
hey it turned out pretty well
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You always need role players or youngsters to step up
In our case, we need Foye and Blatche (and maybe McGee and Young) to take big steps forward. If they do that then we’ll compete. But if no one improves then that’s not necessarily management’s fault. (Though it might be Flip’s fault.)
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I'm saying is that I agree with you.
And that a sizable part of this whole equation is good fortune.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really
Foye + Miller < Allen?
Mmmmmm not so sure, especially not for the needs of this team.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ray Allen >>>> Mike Miller
And the genius of that move by the Celtics was that they got someone who could help them win now and still retained a ton of assets to make a move for Garnett. They got Ray for very little.
In fact, the Allen trade is a great example of the opposite point. The Celtics deserve so much credit then for deciding that they were going to win now, kids be damned. They made a decision on their direction and executed it, costs and roster spots be damned. They took a real risk and it paid off. The Wizards trading for Mike Miller and Randy Foye is nowhere near that.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Celtics Needed Big Name Talent
They only had one go-to player, one All-Star. They were in a different boat than we are in now.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ray ray was one month shy of 32
when that trade was made, coming off surgery, and that WAS a better draft. i’m glad it worked out because allen is one of my favorite players ever, but i think it’s unfair to say we did worse with our trade of the #5 pick.
>> And the genius of that move by the Celtics was that they got someone who could help them win now and still retained a ton of assets to make a move for Garnett. They got Ray for very little.
we gave up very litte, and we still have our al jefferson caliber assets left to deal if we want. but we ain’t trading any of the big 3. EG and abe want to prove everyone wrong. so yeah, cuppett is right, the situations aren’t comparable. and it’s also why it was better to get two complementary players, one of whom still has undetermined potential.
(i’m real late to the thread here, but i found it interesting.)
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 28, 2009 2:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Little?
Mike they got him for #5 in a stacked draft and a STARTING PG in the NBA. You are willfully ignoring history here. Most people freaked out at that move. They turned around and made another move, and then they were geniuses. But they were geniuses with no bench.
If you are making the argument “blow it up and lets get the big fish” thats totally different from, lets trade what we are comfortable with.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I kind of am essentially saying that, ledell
If you are making the argument "blow it up and lets get the big fish"
West didn’t start for OKC, so he meant nothing to them. They also took on a bad contract (Wally).
I also don’t think 2007 is as stacked as people make it out to be. It’s not as stacked as 2008, that’s for sure.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll close off this argument with the reaction from the number 1 Boston homer - Bill Simmons
“Here’s the problem: His draft class was the year before I wrote my first draft diary. His movie ("He Got Game") came out nearly a decade ago. He played at UConn with Donyell Marshall, Donny Marshall and Doron Sheffer. This guy is not a spring chicken — just look at his hairline, for cripes sake. This feels like Mitch Richmond going to the Bullets for C-Webb all over again. I’m somewhere between "quitting coffee and trying to make it through day three" rattled and "waiting for the results of an HIV test"-level rattled. And you know who’s going to suffer? You, the home reader. That’s who.”
Even an obligatory Bullets mention thrown in!
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember when he wrote that
And you’re definitely right, many Boston fans hated that trade. I’ll give you that.
Still, while I am speaking partially from the benefit of hindsight, that logic smells big time. The problem with the Mitch trade was that the Wizards traded their best player for him. The Celtics traded a spare part by their standards. Allen also is the best preparation guy in the league and was going to a situation where his career could age better because he wouldn’t carry the load as much.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you for saving me the time of posting exactly what you just posted!
by Buddha Brown on Jun 26, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
mike- with all due respect, abe was in a wheel chair and needed a breathing tube last time i saw him. they are not breaking up the team and starting over.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What point are you responding to?
Where did I say anything about blowing it up?
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I’m with you. Everyone needs to chill. I think we got a good deal.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 1:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Ernie should have drafted this person:
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 1:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
10 day contract?
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
With those handles and finishing abilities – I mean, it’s a no-brainer.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
THIS is who Ernie should have traded for – I seriously have never seen an NBA player with moves like this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu_moia-oVI
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
MLE
I don’t think Ernie is going to use it. He doesn’t want to spend much more money (or rather, Abe won’t let him). Also, he likes the roster. Evidence for both: he dealt the 32nd pick for cash instead of getting a cheap energetic youngster. More evidence: he didn’t make a play for someone like Carter (who would have cost us a hell of a lot more than Foye/Miller). More evidence: he gave up Songaila instead of Stevenson (Don’t tell me he couldn’t have convinced MN to take back the latter—they wanted #5 BADLY. EG could have thrown in #32 if necessary.).
Mark my words: He’s going to deal Mike James (possibly + NY, Critt or Dominic) for a veteran big man. That’s it, that’s where he’s going. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if he waits until the season starts and see how the 4 guys we have hold it down. I don’t have much of a problem with that. Cap neutral and a good way to utilize Mike James. The guy has value in this economy.
Now don’t get me wrong, Ernie MAY pay the minimum to some veteran schlub or sign an unrestricted free agent rookie, but he’s not spending more than a fraction of the MLE if he can help it. Of course, if the Wiz (knock on wood) lose a big man in training camp (see 2008 Haywood, Brendan), his hand will be forced. But I guess that’s the gamble he’s taking.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 1:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Either Way My Point Still Applies
If Abe pays the MLE, doesn’t pay the MLE but pays the vet minimum, or doesn’t do either but trades for a big, he is still in the luxury tax. Every dollar he saves makes that a little less painful.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure what your original point was
But I think we’re on the same page. I’m really just making an observation of what I think Ernie will do, rather than passing judgment. I do think that the approach the organization is taking is a valid one, although it does have many identifiable weaknesses.
I think Prada’s (and other’s) whole problem with this is that if you are going to 1) sign Arenas and Jamison and not rebuild, and 2) commit to going over the tax at least a little in order to compete, then you need to just bite the bullet and make a play for a championship, costs be damned. His main criticism (if I read him correctly) is that the WIz need to choose one path and stick with it. The problem with this argument, however, is that NO ONE, Abe, Ernie, the fans, wants to blow up this team and start over. We want to win, and win now. We are closer than we’ve been in 15 years to being good. But that doesn’t mean that the team can be financially ignorant. The reality is that the economy sucks and that running a franchise is much like running a business. Resources are not unlimited, and Ernie and Abe have to pinch pennies at the margins. They paid for Gil last year, and so far they have got burnt. I don’t blame them for taking a moderately cautious financial approach to 2009/10.
Maybe the time will come later in the year to make a big play; if so, Wiz are nicely positioned with Miller/Foye/James on expiring deals and Blatche/McGee/Young as assets to dangle. Let’s see how things shake out.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just to Clarify
The original point I was referencing is that we are already in the luxury tax, and saving money by selling the 32nd pick makes that easier to handle. Whether we go $5 million into the tax or $20 million, saving $2.5 million is a big deal, at least to Abe.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotcha
And I don’t necessarily blame him. As I note in my post above, we still have the assets and flexibility to make another move. Whether it be before or after the season starts is a judgment call on Ernie’s part.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they somehow make a big play later
Then I’ll be happy again. But I can’t help but think they missed their best shot when you see that Vince Carter and Amare got traded today. Draft day is the best chance you have.
(It’s also yet another opportunity missed. I feel like we’ve cycled through the “Ernie has something up his sleeve” comments so many times. At a certain point, I want to see some action one way or the other).
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I Recall
Most moves can’t really happen until July 8th. We should be patient until at least then.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree that there was a missed opportunity ... BUT
Amare (if rumors are true, and I think they are) got traded for a pretty sweet package. I don’t know that Butler + 5 would have been much better than what Phoenix got from Golden State. Moreover, I really don’t know if we would have been better. I say no.
Carter? That’s harder to justify. If you put what we had to offer up against what Orlando gave up, then Ernie shoulda got him. No way that the #5 pick isn’t better than Courtney Lee. Lee will never be an All-Star; Nets could have had Rubio (or— even better for them—traded down and picked up future picks). Not only that, Ryan Anderson is underrated and a great pickup for Orlando (IMHO). I guess we just have to assume that Carter either wasn’t available for the right price or that Abe wouldn’t commit to the extra salary in 2010/2011.
So basically, while I think that Ernie didn’t make a perfect move, at least he improved us SOME. While as fans we all want him to perfect the roster ASAP, he’s on a different timetable. I personally don’t care if he makes the final moves we need now or later, as long as he does what is best for the team.
If we are middling along this year and Ernie does nothing to either improve us or reposition us, I’ll be upset. But until the season begins and we see how this roster plays, it’s just too early to judge his moves. I think he bought himself some leeway with the trade; I’ll give him a little more patience in return.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that Amare is not a concern now
Golden State is giving up a crapton for hiim.
And I agree with you on Vince.
I guess I’ll wait and see like you, but I’m very skeptical.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ehh
I think we all are. I’m just choosing to be optimistic.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 26, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
Good for everyone’s sanity.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am surprised
by the incredible freaking out on this board. Are we really that upset about Rubio and Blair (who is not big enough for what we need anyway and has knee issues)? Geez guys. Give them a chance to finish building the roster. I am not scared or jealous that Orlando got Vince or Cleveland got Shaq. We got GILBERT and HAYWOOD, and have Caron and Antawn coming back.
Lets look at the big threes at the top of our conference:
Dwight, Lewis, Vince
LeBron, Shaq, Mo
Ray, Kevin and Paul
Why do you think the sky is falling? If Gilbert can’t play, THEN the sky is falling.
by Unselds on Jun 26, 2009 2:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
but Rubio walks on water
and he would have fallen to us, destiny is certain of that.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny
It may have just been the language barrier and the way he said it, but I got a sense of divine arrogance from Rubio when he was asked by ESPN what NBA player he is most like.
“I’m Ricky Rubio, I’m not like anyone else.”
I thought that was very funny, as if he is some sort of basketball god that nobody could even compare himself to.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
But all three of those groups have guys who play defense. The Wizards can’t stop anyone.
by Matt K. on Jun 26, 2009 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep- you cant win without it. and it is one reason why we will never win with gilbert. one guy who takes up two positions and ignores half the game. i like him. he is competitive. but he only gets a ring when we have a superstar down low. so sit back, enjoy the show and shoot for the conference finals.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huh? to Both of You
Matt K.:
But all three of those groups have guys who play defense.
les boulez bomber:
yep- you cant win without it. and it is one reason why we will never win with gilbert.
Um, only the Boston group plays great defense anymore. We have already proven we get beat them when healthy, despite this. Orlando has Lewis and Vince, not good defenders. Mo is capable, but not great. Shaq is too old to defend the pick-and-roll effectively. Guess what kind of offense Flip Saunders likes to run?
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't Orlando first or second in defensive efficiency this year?
Plus defensive player of the year D. Howard? I don’t think it’s correct to say that only Boston plays great defense.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 27, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes they were
Orlando was #1 in defense this year. Everybody forgets this.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 27, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Didn't Forget
But the OP said the players were the ones that played great defense. It was the team that had a good defense overall, because of Van Gundy’s scheme, but two of the three players on the group he mentioned for Orlando are not good individual defenders.
My point is that it was the defensive scheme that makes Orlando and Cleveland good defenses. If Van Gundy can get Rashard Lewis and Vince Carter to play great defense, and if Mike Brown can get Mo and Shaq to play good defense, then why can’t Flip get Antawn, Gil, and Caron? It’s the scheme, stupid. (Reference to the famous line, “it’s the economy, stupid,” not a personal attack on anyone.)
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 27, 2009 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see what you were saying
Note to self: don’t jump into a convo without reading the proper context.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 28, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah my bad.
I misunderstood your point also. You were talking about the big three for each team, not the team itself.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 28, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bottom line of all this banter
Is that the Wiz will make another move. We’re not done. The cash saved on Rubio and Blair prevents Abe from going to the upper room when we make our next move. It will either be to add an MLE to balance out the depth on our roster and add a 5th big. Or we will use our pieces to get a more able player to improve our 8-9 man rotation maybe thru a trade, sign and trade, or maybe a three team deal where we utilize our MLE.
Be easy
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 2:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
or he doesn't
and then you, I, cupp, and DWFan can be the first up against the wall or offer an apology to disgrunted.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
I will probably apologize some, but I will still wait until I see if Rubio plays, if he does play how well he plays, how well DeJuan Blair plays, and how well Mike Miller and Randy Foye contribute to our success before I conclude that Ernie is an idiot and needs to be fired.
I was extremely disappointed in Ernie at the last draft, and then JaVale McGee heavily surprised me. Maybe Mike Miller and Randy Foye will have the same effect.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry cupp
I wasn’t even referencing Rubio/Blair.
I’m talking about the possibility of not making another move.
If we don’t make a move, and we go forward with 7 guards and 4 bigs, well then the defenders of the trade might need to mea culpa. But since I think the chance that Ernie does make some sort of move or signing, I’m not expecting to eat to much crow.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he doesn't, i'll have my bread ready
and make a crow sandwich
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Was Referencing Not Making Another Move
No need to apologize. If we don’t make another move, then the trade haters will all come and say, “See, we should have taken Rubio and Blair! Now we don’t have enough big men to compete!”
I’ll apologize some if that happens, but then I’ll wait and see how the team does with what we have and how Rubio and Blair does before I commit to calling the offseason a complete disaster. Who knows, maybe Blatche and McGee will work hard and/or bulk up in the offseason and step their games up so much next season that we really won’t need that extra big. Very unlikely, but not completely impossible.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ah
well gorebd and I will split the crow sandwich amongst ourselves.
i prefer a tangy dijon mustard.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll Have Half a Crow Sandwich
And save the rest for the season. :-)
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
?
“and then you, I, cupp, and DWFan can be the first up against the wall or offer an apology to disgrunted.”
I haven’t been following this discussion, just skimmed and saw my user name. Apologize to me for what? Did you rip me a new one above? If so, I hope it was at least funny.
No one has to apologize for having an opinion that proves to be wrong. I say that hoping that I am very wrong about this trade. If Rubio doesn’t become a star and/or Foye because Chauncey Billups part 2, all is well.
by disgrunted on Jun 26, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant "Foye becomes Billups...."
by disgrunted on Jun 26, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They were saying if Ernie does nothing, they owe you an apology because you'd be right
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'll see
I’ve heard the “we’ll make another move, just watch” too many times to trust it.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Offseason Just Started
Ernie doesn’t have to do everything before the draft. There is still plenty of time to make moves before the season. It just sucks because we will have nothing to talk about until then. But there is no sense in passing judgment out of boredom.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its funny, everyone is saying we were too quick on the trigger
With the Miller/Foye trade, but we missed the boat on a major move? Free agency hasn’t even started yet. If we made all of our offseason moves at the draft, that would be too quick on the trigger. I remember the Garnett deal being done after the draft.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again
Boston still had Al Jefferson, Gerald Green, Theo Ratliff’s expiring deal, Ryan Gomes, Sebastian Telfair, etc. to make their move for KG.
That’s way more than Mike James, Nick Young and Javaris Crittenton.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but Mike
thats only if you don’t consider our entire team assets.
and I’m in agreement with you, that EG probably doesn’t and won’t break up the Big 3 under any circumstances.
But its a philosophical difference between two organizations, not a talent gap.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're not including all of our assets
I want to hold on to some of them, but if the right opportunity comes along… We have Mike James, Brendan Haywood, Mike Miller, Randy Foye expiring deals. We have prospects in Randy Foye, Nick Young, Javaris Crittendon, Dom McGuire, Andray Blatche, and Javale McGee. We have 3 All-Stars.
Not to say that I want to move all of these pieces, but literally every player on our roster is now an attractive commodity. If a big deal comes along, the question isn’t whether we have enough, but will we actually pull the trigger? I feel we have enough pieces to acquire any player in the league if we really wanted him.
by gorebd on Jun 26, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's true
I keep forgetting about Miller/Foye. Mea culpa. And you’re right, they could dump Blatche or McGee during the season. You’re right, gorebd, we eventually do have a lot of assets. I take that first statement back.
I will say that it’s worth noting that Foye and Miller can’t be traded unless by themselves until late August, so they’re basically meaningless for mega-deal purposes until the season. And with our lack of frontcourt depth, we probably can’t trade Blatche or McGee until the season either. That effectively means we have very few assets for most of the offseason.
And, I’m also skeptical we’ll actually use those assets after passing this time. But one person’s skepticism is another person’s optimism. Either point of view is perfectly fair.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
when the economy is still stalled 9 months from now, there will be great players available and cheap. the league will be very polarized. good for us as the dc economy will hold up better.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dazed And Confused
I’m a longtime Bullets/Wizards fan like everyone else in here. I was ok with the Minnesota trade, but after last nights b.s. I feel like we are slipping back into the TWILIGHT ZONE and it’s only going to get worse. I really hope I’m wrong on this andthere really is another move coming. I don’t like the fact of the front office telling us that the tax will not dictate the moves that are made. After last night I feel mislead!
by Beltwayboy on Jun 26, 2009 2:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not to change subjects
but ESPN is has a rumor that AD is on the block.
Lets make it eight guards!
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/features/rumors?addata=2009_insdr_mod_nba_xxx_xxx
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 2:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Feel Sorry for AD
He played better for the Hornets than he did for us, but he is still probably on his last legs. He doesn’t have much to give anymore. He was really bad for us to start the season, the likely result of too many Gerald Wallace-like drive and crashes to the basket.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coach?
I would offer him a position in a heartbeat.
Of course, NY and AB would probably run for the hills.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to Mention Taser
His impersonation of AD was dead on and hilarious.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Idea
That would make me feel better about all thats transpired the past week knowing that AD will be on the sidelines for us next year.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But
I thought that Ivan Carter said that one of the reasons Daniels was traded last year was because he was complaining and mouthing off a bit, and they didn’t want that to bring down the team.
Me, I’m happy that Cassell is on the sidelines. It’s a new voice, and he can instill that kind of crazy this team needs.
by disgrunted on Jun 26, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm Not Sure What the Official Reason Was
But I do know that his game was heavily deteriorated when he played for us last season. Other teams would abuse us whenever he was in the game almost as badly as they abused us when Etan was in the game. He had nothing left for us, but I admit to not watching him much after he left for New Orleans.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not Upset
I for one am psyched. The talent level on the team has gone up bigtime. Did any of you watch this team last year? Guard play was horrible. By the time Rubio gets good the Wizards will have made the conference finals. What else did we give up? Opec, ET? They didn’t even deserver their roster spots. DS did, but are we really jumping off the cliff because we lost a tough minded backup who averages 3 rebounds a game? The hostility toward EG and AP baffles me. They got better, isn’t that what we wanted?
by ReboundingLs on Jun 26, 2009 2:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s true our team is going to be much better than last year. If Gil is healthy and back to his former self, I don’t see how we wouldn’t be one of the best in the East. Only Orlando, Boston, and Cleve will be better than us – and that’s a maybe. :)
But if he isn’t healthy – if has another season ending injury – I’m done. This is the last straw. Whatever that means.
However, there are quite a bit of question marks. But, I don’t think we should be freaking out. I agree with Unselds’ assessment. I’m happy to have Foye/Miller over Rubio/Blair. Well, we’ll see. :/
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Curry?
Nobody’s worried about Curry being good? He has a much better shot at stardom on the court than Ricky, guys. And Wilbon???? Are you kidding me? Wilbon thought the Ike Austin trade was great. He said the Celtics would sweep the Bulls even without KG. Get him outta here! If Wilbon says we missed a huge opportunity, I’m even more satisfied that Rubio will be a bust.
by Unselds on Jun 26, 2009 3:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wilbon Probably Still Thinks
That we need a point guard because Magic Johnson said so. I haven’t read his latest article but that’s the assumption I have.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wilbon may be irrelevant...
but he is laughing all the way to the bank!
Glad to see everyone is cooling down a bit and realizing that we did pick up two proven, solid, relatively low-mileage NBA players who seem happy to be Wizards.
And there must be, has to be, more to come!
by khrabb on Jun 26, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Curry as well
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trade/free agent thread
Let’s get it started. I would love to be distracted from thinking about the past few days.
by morethesamewiz on Jun 26, 2009 3:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and then
we can all put away our knives and come to some consensus
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Knees
I am hearing that he fell so far is his knees. I hear He couldn’t pass many physicals, and everyone had him red flagged. I guess Ernie didn’t want another athlete with bad legs. I feel a bit better now. I just hope we can do something else.
by Unkle Wheez on Jun 26, 2009 4:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Without making another move we are still a better team then we were last year.
Adding Rubio would of been nice if he wanted to play here and/or didn’t have the option of hiding out in Spain if he didn’t get picked by a team he wanted. But I think we were smart for trading out of the pick, picking up two players who will help us next year and are better than whatever we could of gotten at 5 for this next season.
I also don’t understand why everyone is getting so butt hurt about not taking Dejuan Blair. Sure he was great in college, but lets face some facts, he is only 6’6, he is strong as an ox but pretty unathletic, he has bad knees that aren’t going to get any better over the course of his career. We weren’t the only team who passed on him and there is reason for that. I’d rather take the money we got for him and sign a veteran FA. there are plenty on the market from Gortat, to Pachulia, to Bass to McDyess, to Gooden, the list goes on.
I think the mystique of the draft screws everyone’s head up. People are willing to pass on a sure thing for the small chance at greatness. We are getting two players who are proven at the NBA level and help our chances at winning tomorrow. They aren’t superstars but who’s to guarantee someone like Curry is a superstar and not a 2009 version of his father (not a bad player at all just saying)
Darius Songalia was a great depth guy for us last year but you can’t tell me that is really the breaking point of the trade for some of you. We can pick up a Songalia in FA, that’s not hard to find.
The trade really comes down to sure thing versus the chance at greatness. We took the sure thing, get an ultra solid Mike Miller who does a lot of the little things on the court plus has a killer shot and we get Randy Foye who still has potential and has done nothing but improve every year. Does he have the ceiling of Ricky Rubio or Stephen Curry? probably not but both of those players are 100% more likely to bust because we know what we are getting with Foye.
by Buddha Brown on Jun 26, 2009 4:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
True, I'm excited for the season
It’s tough looking at the trade afterward knowing that Rubio fell that far. I’m interested in seeing the next move or two that the Wizards make in the frontcourt.
If Arenas really is back to 100%, this is going to be a fun season — mainly on the offensive side of the ball, but still.
by Matt K. on Jun 26, 2009 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Only on the offensive side
:) – But I’d much rather be a fan of one of the best offensive teams than defensive… I don’t care how deep they go – it’s just so much more fun to watch and root for.
I still dream about watching those D’Antoni Suns in their heydays. And I wasn’t even a die-hard fan.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that last sentence is pretty fair
The trade really comes down to sure thing versus the chance at greatness.
We took the sure thing. That’s a fair way of seeing things. I just wish we took a chance here.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The thing is that chance is amplified in this situation because we could of selected Rubio and then had him pull this staying in Europe stuff with us instead of Minnesota.
by Buddha Brown on Jun 26, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there is no guarantee
that Rubio would have dropped if we had stayed at 5
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mike, we took the chance when we threw the big bucks at Gil and AJ...
You can’t double down on a pair of 9s.
That said, it surely would have been fun to watch Rubio tossing Alley Oops to JaVale and Taser. We would quite likely have led the league in TOP 10 PLAYS if nothing else.
by khrabb on Jun 26, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not talking about keeping Rubio, khrabb
I’m talking about using Rubio’s rights to trade for someone better than Miller/Foye, like Vince Carter.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
almost no good players come from the second round. you are probably better off selling the pick every year and getting a veteran because you almost always end up with the blatches and ETs of the world: talent that either does not exist or develop and you end up giving them 5-10mm per year three years later because they are “promising.” save the money and land a legitimate superstar you can build around, not one that ties up two positions and skips out on half the game.
by les boulez bomber on Jun 26, 2009 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The highest paid player on our team
Was a second round draft pick.
2 of the 4 young players we are high on, were second round draft picks.
I love what people like Daryl Morey do in acquiring all these 2nd round picks – their contracts are cheap and you can find some gems there.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 26, 2009 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, But
Even you would agree that a second round pick is a lot more risky when you are trying to acquire an immediate contributor for a playoff team that has a very small window (3-4 seasons) to win a championship.
If Daryl Morey were running the team, he probably would have already broken up the Big 3 by now to ensure future competiveness. But that ship sailed for our team at the last trade deadline.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 26, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our Draft Score is TBD
Slam sums up our draft day pretty nicely:
Washington Wizards: B
Players Chosen: None
This is very much a To Be Determined grade for Washington, but let’s gives them the benefit of the doubt for now. In trading away the 5th pick the Wizards may have passed on the opportunity to get a special player (Ricky Rubio, Jonny Flynn, etc.) but they did add a pair of veteran players that will be able to help out right away. In adding Mike Miller and Randy Foye to a lineup that already includes Antawn Jamison, Caron Butler, Gilbert Arenas and a slew of promising youngsters, Washington may have moved themselves back into the playoff picture in the Eastern Conference. Of course it could all blow up in their face if Miller and Foye don’t mesh and Ricky Rubio turns into the next big thing.
Exactly. As many have been saying, we’ll have to wait and see. Ernie’s grade is TBD.
by se7en on Jun 26, 2009 4:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Honestly
At the end of the day I’m just happy we’re not dealing with this:
http://www.canishoopus.com/2009/6/26/926791/there-was-a-small-chance-that#comments
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 7:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Now we've gone and made Dad angry...

Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 7:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
CHILL THE FUCK OUT! WE DIDNT JUST TRADE FOR IKE AUSTIN, MITCH THE BITCH, OR STACK
I haven’t posted in far too long, but I’m sick of this bitching.
I’m gonna be real concise here.
1. Ricky Rubio is not Pistol Pete, he never will be. At his best, he can be a White Chocolate (jason williams) who plays exceptional defense. Everybody loves to reference his “amazing” game against USA in the Olympics. He hurt his hand. He’s not Willis motherfucking Reed. Go ahead and check his stat line or his efficiency for that game. He was servicable at BEST.
2. STOP TALKING UNTIL JULY 8th. STOP IT. STOP IT RIGHT NOW. None of us has any clue what’s going to happen. If you are still unhappy after; fine. Go for it.
Just because Flip’s coming and all this talk about “contending” people are freaking the fuck out because ‘oh shit, we might NOT be contenders’!?!?!? Like that’s a mind-blowing shock???? ‘I can’t believe that my team may not live up to its lofty aspirations?!?!’
Give me a break.
Yes, we should have taken DeJuan Blair. We should have. But cease the bitching until we know for a fact that money isn’t being spent elsewhere.
Keep in mind: Nobody seems to remember that Rubio already expressed displeasure at the prospect of playing in Washington; much more definite displeasure than “my mom hates the cold”, Fegan thought he wouldnt be a good fit with Arenas.
calm down ladies. calm yourselves.
DAGGER!
by SP Yup on Jun 26, 2009 8:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ill take rod strickland over rubio anyday :)
DAGGER!
by SP Yup on Jun 26, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stop name-calling
I said very clearly that was unacceptable.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 26, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wait, was that at me? if so, sorry.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 26, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
don't think that was at you
but at sp yup
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 28, 2009 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ernie says he plans on using that money (2.5m), and some other guards (Mike James, possibly Deshawn if anyone will take him) to get a veteran big man. If we can get a decent banger in there, that would be awesome. It would even out the roster, and provide a much needed big man. I’ll reserve judgment until I see who that big man is, but I’ll assume he’ll be BETTER than Blair.
Therefore, I agree with Ernie’s reasoning in not picking Blair.
by se7en on Jun 27, 2009 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where/When did Ernie say that?
Link?
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 27, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s a mixture of what Ernie’s said and what sources/journalists are saying.
In that comcast interview, Ernie says he sold the 2nd round pick to get a veteran. Then Mike Jones:
Washington, I’m told, received $2.5 million from Houston for that pick (Jermaine Taylor) and will spend the summer pursuing another big man either through free agency or trade. Grunfeld & Co. are aware that the need remains, and with Andray Blatche and JaVale McGee still unproven, they would rather get a veteran — even if it does end up being more expensive than what they would’ve paid Blair. Mike James and his expiring contract are bound to be a part of the possible pieces to move as part of a trade to acquire a big man, and maybe DeShawn Stevenson as well, although with him just coming off back surgery, teams might not want to touch him.
Then Michael Lee (the entire article is speculating on this veteran big man):
Selling second-round pick Jermaine Taylor to Houston added another $2.5 million to Abe Pollin’s pockets, according to someone with knowledge of the transaction. The move increases the possibility of the Wizards adding a veteran big man through free agency if they desire.
I think it’s safe to assume they will get a veteran big man. And Rook’s latest talks more about this.
by se7en on Jun 29, 2009 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the links
I wasn’t really doubting you, just wondering what your basis was for your comment. I hadn’t heard that interview with Ernie. I still think it’s unlikely that they’ll sign a vet in FA(like Lee seems to think) unless they sign one for the minimum. I think it’s gonna be a trade. Regardless, good stuff all around.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 29, 2009 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















