Yay Guards?
That's basically all I've got with this trade right now. The following players are now in contention for the starting shooting guard spot.
Good luck finding 100 or so minutes for all seven of those guys. Meanwhile, Antawn Jamison and Brendan Haywood are currently being backed up exclusively by Andray Blatche and JaVale McGee. Time to grow up, I guess.
I'll have much more on this later, but there has to be another move out there to balance the roster for this trade to make much sense. The Wizards needed perimeter shooting, sure, but not at the expense of having no frontcourt players. Why else would DeShawn kept while Darius was shipped out? I don't know, it's odd. Was that really a dealbreaker?
Foye's got some game, and Miller isn't nearly as bad as he was in Minnesota last year, but it seems the Wiz tried to do a zillion things at once (add a veteran, cut salary, upgrade the team) instead of sticking to a path and going on it. Hopefully this is just a start, and if so, kudos to management, but I'd definitely be disappointed if this is our big move.
About the one thing we can say is that we're better tomorrow than we were at the start of the day. This trade leaves way more questions than answers, though. Namely:
- How are we going to divide minutes among seven players for 48 minutes at shooting guard and whatever scraps are left behind Arenas and Butler?
- This trade does nothing to help our defense. How do we do that?
- Why make the trade today and not hold out for more on draft day, in case Thabeet or Rubio slips?
- If perimeter shooting was what we were after, why not just draft Stephen Curry?
- Why decimate our frontcourt to make this move?
- What's the long-term future of Foye and Miller on this team?
- What about Nick Young, Javaris Crittenton and Dominic McGuire?
- What's the second move?
- Do we even have enough assets left to make a second move?
So much for trading for a "sure thing."
0 recs |
228 comments
Comments
Could a Mike James for Jared Jeffries move be next? Or a Mike James for some big man trade? That second idea would make the most sense.
My first reaction when I saw that Songalia was traded was to think that Ernie is still Eddie Jordan-proofing the team. Ha.
by disgrunted on Jun 23, 2009 9:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gortat
Someone in the last thread mentioned Gortat. Anyone know what it would take to get him?
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 23, 2009 9:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The MLE
He’s a free agent.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Will they be able to re-sign him
If they also re-sign Turkoglu?
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 23, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In case it’s not obvious, I have no idea how the NBA salary system works
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Jun 23, 2009 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sign and trade?
he seems worth the price. maybe we can deal orlando james in return
by wizchamp on Jun 23, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BYC again, I believe
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When you do a s&t
That player does become BYC. (Or, usually they do.) Washington doesn’t have that cap room to absorb that deal.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus it would be easier to sign Gortat outright anyway
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
trade james, stevenson
i always thought dom dom could be a backup SF
by wizchamp on Jun 23, 2009 9:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just saw this
What does this do as far as the cap is concerned? Anyone crunched the numbers yet?
by Matt K. on Jun 23, 2009 9:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Basically cap neutral
We cleared a bit out of our post-2010 salary because Songaila’s contract went further than 2010, but that money will probably just be used to re-sign Haywood and Miller/Foye.
Foye’s rookie contract expires after next year.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow.
I’m stunned that they already made this move. I guess they didn’t want Harden or Curry. McGee better be ready to step up now in a big way.
I assume this also makes the big three happy; Miller gives them a shooter on the wing, but you’re right: Where’s the defense?
by Matt K. on Jun 23, 2009 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with all but #5
We didn’t “decimate” the front court; rather, we still have our top four post players. I definitely question ditching Songaila instead of DeShawn, but since there MUST be another trade coming I think we can rest assured that Ernie will add post depth from somewhere.
The rest of the questions are all quite valid though, and I doubt we’ll get satisfactory answers to all of them before the season begins. Hope you know what you are doing Ernie…
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 10:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that's true
I’m reconsidering that portion of the trade. It’s probably not the right word to use there.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Regardless
Your point about DeShawn and Songaila is definitely on point. Songaila has always been a useful reserve when he sticks to the 4 spot, and thus would be a hell of a lot more useful to the team as now assembled. Would Minny really have pulled the plug on this if we insisted they take DeShawn? I doubt it.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Start Gil, McGuire and Butler. Backups are PG Foye, SF Miller and offense/defense Young/Stevenson. Clearly they’d prefer to go with Young but when you need more defense DS is there (eventually).
Gilbert hasn’t played a NBA schedule in how long? Stevenson is rehabbing after BACK surgery. Ernie watched the season crumble because there was on depth behind them last year. Now we have Foye as a good back up or a worthy starter in spots AND the sharpshooter to keep defenses honest the way Roger Mason did.
We know there is more to be done, its obvious. So I’m going to refrain from freaking out about roster balance on June 23rd.
by Jheiser3 on Jun 23, 2009 10:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
R
Are we really worrying about finding time for Deshawn Stevenson and Javaris Crittenton? Isn’t that a good problem for a supposed playoff team?
by Jheiser3 on Jun 23, 2009 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, no
But then they’re deadweight, in which case, why are they on the roster?
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Less dead weight
than Etan Thomas and Pecherov….
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 23, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess
But again, that’s exactly what this trade has turned into. Improving our roster, but not really getting too far at improving our weaknesses.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well,
Depends on what you call weaknesses….
If you think that 3-Point shooting was a weakness last year -then the trade did a lot to help
If you think the Wizards needed more rebounding from their SG position – then the trade did a lot to help
If you think the Wiz needed more passing from their Guards – then this trade did a lot to help
If you think that the team needed a better backup PG than Mike James or Crittenton – then this trade did a lot to help
If you think that the team needed to get better defensive players – then this was a crappy trade.
I DO think that the roster is now lopsided – so I hope there’s another trade on the way.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 23, 2009 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It helped some weaknesses
We have better shooting and passing. Not rebounding, though. And definitely not defense.
Put it this way: it didn’t help with our biggest weakness and it didn’t provide as clear an upgrade as several other rumors out there.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
C
Couldn’t you say that about almost any 13th-15th roster spot? Crit won’t be dead weight when they move Mike James. He’ll be the 3rd PG that they are developing. That’s depth. Better to have him in that slot than Juan DIxon.
DeShawn will have value again, once he is healthy.
by Jheiser3 on Jun 24, 2009 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Craziest fact about Randy Foye from Wikipedia
In June 2006, it was reported that Foye has the rare condition situs inversus, which means his organs are arranged as the mirror image of a normal person’s: for example, his heart is in the right side of his chest rather than the left. However, it is not expected that this fact will have an impact on his game
by AndNone on Jun 23, 2009 10:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
heart
your heart isn’t on the right side it’s in the middle beneath your sternum. your lungs are on the right and left sides
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kind of ...
The heart is somewhat centrally located, but in the normal human body it is shifted to the left with the lateral portion close to the lower chest wall on the left. In patient’s with situs inversus everything is flipped (as AndNone said). His liver is on the left, his gall bladder on the left, his stomach on the right, his heart is on the right. It is pretty crazy and pretty rare, but totally awesome.
by GodWuzAWiz on Jun 23, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and Dr. GodWuzAWiz
finally checks in!
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 23, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep yep
I caught yer comment on situs inversus on the other thread, but I been biding my time. I have seen this twice, it’s pretty cool.
by GodWuzAWiz on Jun 23, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Guess nobody got my “If his heart’s in the right place” reference earlier in the week.
by MR on Jun 23, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not the funniest part
He had no clue that he had it till the Draft Combine. Shouldn’t a doctor have noticed before then? I mean had he never been to a doctor before then?
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 24, 2009 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Overall Pretty High on This...
First post here, but I have been reading this site religiously the whole season. By way of introduction, I have been a Bullets fan since early childhood and my family has had season tickets since before I was born (I even got to attend the Webber-Howard Bullets almost beating the Jordan Bulls at home in that best of 3 1seed vs. 8 seed matchup in the playoffs) and have suffered through many terrible seasons with players like Michael “the Animal” Smith (who my dad and I always called “the Manimal”) to whom my screen name is an homage.
Anyhow, I have been going back and forth on how much I like this trade. I remember thinking about this particular trade possibility when it was rumored that the Wolves were shopping Miller and Foye for the pick. My conclusion at the time was that Miller + the 18th pick for Etan + 5 was not enough, but that if we could also get Foye that it may be worth doing as long as we could cut one of our contracts with 2+ years let and clear a roster spot to sign a pick. My questions after the trade have actually gone through are the following:
1. Why include Darius instead of Deshawn?
We are getting back a 1/2 and a 2/3 and instead of shipping a run-down 2 out of town we gave up one of the true warriors from last season who gave us shooting, Why give up Darius and create a real hole in our frontcourt rotation if his salary is only about $1m/year higher than Deshawn’s? Salary can’t be that big of a factor at this point.
2. Why couldn’t we get Minn to give us one of their late first rounders?
We now have 2 roster spots open (Had 14 players, traded 3 and got 2 back), and if Minn wanted the #5 bad enough we could have pried one of their first rounders from them. I think we are likely to sign a veteran backup center, so I would like to have seen us stay in the first round and then use our second round pick on a draft and stash type player. I just don’t think we are going to get any sort of a rotation player for our front court at #32.
3. What does this mean for the future of Nick and Javaris?
It seems like Foye and Miller are going to get the lion’s share of the minutes at the 2 spot and that Foye will probably do spot backup for Arenas at the 1 spot. I can see Nick getting some minutes, but this trade makes Javaris mostly redundant, which confuses me because I thought that Ernie was really high on Javaris. I don’t think Javaris has much value in a trade and ultimately I am a bit worried that we won’t be able to use him effectively and he will go to waste as an asset despite showing some promise down the stretch last year (I loved him motor and his quickness).
4. What is our next move?
We need a 4/5 to complete our front court rotation and our remaining assets are basically Nick Young and Mike James’s expiring contract. If we don’t want to take on a contract, then who should we target that has a roughly $8-9mil expiring deal that could help us this year?
5. How does this set us up for next offseason?
Foye and Miller both come off the books (though we can make Foye an RFA) and so do Mike James and Brendan. This means we have approximately $21mill (??) in salary coming off the books this coming off season and we need to use some of that to re-sign Brendan. How much will we have left after we re-sign Brendan and what should we do with that cash?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 10:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Welcome to the site!
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks/Deshawn
Reading up on stuff that was written while I was typing that post, the point about Deshawn pasing a physical makes a LOT of sense. If Ernie wanted this deal done and we didn’t think Deshawn could pass the physical, then we would be willing to ship Darius out and accept the extra salary savings as a bonus.
I wonder if the decision to include Darius over Deshawn indicates a rush to get the deal done so we can also swing mystery deal #2 though …
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I’m starting to feel less angry about Darius/DeShawn just because DeShawn’s trade value is probably negative zilch right now with his back problems.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Important questions
Good stuff there. If the Wizards are prepared to move their other expiring contract trade chip in James, it would appear to be to target a defensive frontcourt player.
Also, does Foye play the one, or does he just play shooting guard? I don’t know enough about him.
by Matt K. on Jun 23, 2009 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he's much better at the 2 than the 1, from what I've read
He largely flopped as a 1 the last couple of years.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wish we had the cap space to sign Drew Gooden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk
by hibachi on Jun 23, 2009 10:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Any chance Minnesota buys out Songaila?
by bronco6778 on Jun 23, 2009 10:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
For $8.8 million in the next two years?
I doubt it. Plus he has a player option of $4.8 mil in 2010/2011.
by Matt K. on Jun 23, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lets all feign some excitement here
the folks at Canis Hoopis are mocking us mercilessly.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 23, 2009 10:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
They haven’t seen the pupu platter (save Songaila) we’re sending.
by bronco6778 on Jun 23, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well they are certainly intrigued by the front court depth
that Pech and Etan will give them
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 23, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's funny
Pech couldn’t even get on the floor of a 19 win team.
by bronco6778 on Jun 23, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's completely hilarious
Minn traded their 3rd and 4th best players to us for salary filler (pech & etan) and a decent 3rd PF who has a somewhat bad contract & the 5th pick.
If Minn are excited about anything other than making their team younger or possibly trading up for Rubio, then they don’t understand their side of the trade.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, noticed that.
also noticed that a few of them were real happy to get OP… so shows what they know
by 7Swords of Salat on Jun 23, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, free poetry night in Minny
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 23, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think they're more excited about getting #5
And beginning the rebuilding process with two guys they don’t really want long-term anyway.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why I’m hoping beyond all logic they’ll buy out Songaila.
by bronco6778 on Jun 23, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know
but I’ve been over there too Mike, and you have been, how shall we say, restrained in your criticism of Thomas. Which is unlike you. I was expecting a full stats throw down on how Etan will tear the young Wolves asunder.
I just think its funny to watch them try to find the virtues of Thomas and Pech, while we do the same for Miller and Foye.
Positive – I don’t think Kevin Love will rip out one of his dreadlocks.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 23, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meh
I like those guys. The front-page guys are really smart (S&P called this trade about three weeks ago) and their posters are pretty intelligent and friendly. A good community they’ve got there.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to knock the posters
but to make sure they knew about the REAL Etan Thomas
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 23, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't understand why we didn't get 28
28 and 32 could’ve = a trade up to get DeJuan Blair?
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jun 23, 2009 10:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm kind of surprised too
I thought that if the Wiz moved the No. 5 pick, that they’d get a later first rounder in whatever deal they made.
by Matt K. on Jun 23, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ernie CANNOT be done yet.
It should be easy to trade for a reliable 4 and get a late first round pick to refill our front court. I’m liking the moves grunfeld is making.
by Knowledge92 on Jun 23, 2009 10:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe packaging one of the big 3?
Hi first time poster here although a life-time Bullets/Wizards fan. I can’t believe I didn’t know about a site that replicates the exact conversations I have with 4-6 of my close friends on a daily basis. And like everyone else, we’ve gone through the rollercoaster of emotions when seeing this trade. First reaction of “what the, that’s it?” to “At least we’re actually better than we were yesterday” to “there’s got to be another move”.
And on that last question I started thinking that although EG has said he doesn’t want to trade any of the big 3, I think this trade actually puts us in a much better position to actually do it now. If we can get back a real quality big man for a combination/all of one of the big 3, Young, and James, why not? I haven’t seen anyone mention this possibility, is it because EG would never pull the trigger on our big 3?
by Unseld'ed on Jun 23, 2009 10:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Welcome
Tell your friends to join too.
As far as the Big 3, I actually think a Butler for Amare deal makes sense now. But I also doubt it happens.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better position to trade one of the big 3
I think you are right about that, but I don’t think we are going to land one of the superstars with an expiring contract unless we still had the #5 to package with them.
I don’t want to see the team trade Butler or Jamison and get back a player with 3/4 years on his deal who may or may not work out. If we could somehow swing Jamison + James + Nick/Foye for Bosh (+ filler) I would be all ears though.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Got to have received a pick along with all of this
Got rid of dead weight contracts but may have put to much emphasis on doing so and now roster is a little off balance. Of course with McGuire you have a guy that can play 4 positions and somehow the front office must still have faith in Bulletproof. IF Wizards got the 18th or 24th pick along with this they made out like bandits. As it is still puts team in position to make playoffs easy next year. Can’t really put a negative spin on this move. Good Job.
by LoneWiz54 on Jun 23, 2009 11:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Several thoughts
I’ll miss Pecherov on the Jumbotron. We should leave him there. If he ever gets on the court for them, I’ll cheer him on like a mad man.
Songaila drove me nuts, but at least he tried hard. I’d like to thank him for that.
I wonder how much trade value Foye has? I don’t want to give up Miller now… if we swap Miller for Camby I don’t know why we wouldn’t have just traded for Camby in the first place. I like Critt at the 1 and Dom at the 2 as backups. Foye + James + NY= something, right? Don’t get me wrong, I like NY, but if he keeps fading away on EVERY SHOT he’s never going to get us foul shots.
I was going to wish for Mills at the 32 if we traded the 5. Now that seems ridiculous.
...one of those guys who reads all the time but barely comments
by Juice over Whine on Jun 23, 2009 11:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Can we trade Foye or Miller right away?
I don’t understand the rules on this – can players we just acquired be shipped out of town immediately thereafter?
I had thought not, but then I saw the espn story about the Bucks trading Oberto for Amir Johnson.
To give you an idea of Foye’s potential trade value, Bill Simmons discussed a trade of Foye and expiring contracts and picks for Tony Parker. After seeing us get him this cheaply though I don’t think that kind of rumor has any legs.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Either can be traded – they just cannot be traded with another player…
In other words, we can trade Miller for Camby –
but we could not trade Miller and another player for anybody.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 23, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How long is that true?
When in the season could we move either player in a package?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dec 15 I think
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baby Stewey
Ya, something about watching a 7 foot tall baby stewey dancing on the jumbotron was kind of hypnotic. I also really liked how they always had segments where the other players were making fun of him.
I liked Pech as a person – its too bad that someone in his camp convinced him that the only way he could stay in the league was to become a strech-your-team-out-3-point-center.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i was building a tribal bond fire with my family and friends and i knew we made a trade i felt it yooo … this is freakin CRazy i came home to check it out lol ….. i like this trade very good team players for our big three would of loved to get one of there later picks too but hey at least we did not give up any of our promising youngins …. the draft was too risky anyone we picked could of been a bust outside of Blake …. this is great news for our team
i got to gooo … im going to ask the spirits to bless our team and guide us to the championship :)
by eltacoman on Jun 23, 2009 11:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is Butler for Stoudemire in the works?
With Miller able to play the 3, perhaps Ernie is working a deal with Phoenix to send Butler and James for Stoudemire.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 23, 2009 11:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't seem like enough to me...
Stoudemire should garner more – but it’s been almost a year since Phoenix started shopping him – perhaps this is the best they can do.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 23, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
doubtful
i think management is banking on another run by the big three, i doubt theyd suddenly trade on of them away…i think they’re pretty sold on the trio
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see it happening. Butler, imo, is the Wizards best player, and Stoudamire’s game has holes. Amare’s more hype than substance, where as Butler is a straight baller. There’s a reason Phoenix is trying to move him so aggressively, and i would bet it’s that Kerr feels that he’s already hit his ceiling. He plays little defence, so if you thought we had a pourous defence now… Anyway, my point is that I would bet Butler is more than enough to net Stoudamire. I don’t see Phoenix bringing in anything better.
by iRONLiON on Jun 23, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arenas healthy is better than Butler
That’s not debatable.
However, I agree that the Suns aren’t going to do better than Caron for Amare.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Either Crit or Young is going to be traded. Most likely Young due to his value. James finally finds his role: cheerleader.
by Fundefined on Jun 23, 2009 11:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
my thoughts
after reading that we got foye i was pretty excited and somewhat about miller but i do have to agree with most that this leaves our front court a little uncertain. i think the wiz have high (maybe too high) hopes for mcgee and blatche so they delt away our bigs. I also think that they are possibly too uncertain about arenas and so they brought foye in as a saftey net/insurance incase gil goes down again. Or like a few have said, we are preparing a second trade for a big
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I know everyone is saying to swing James + Young for the next trade
But why not package out James + Critt? Let Foye handle the ball behind Arenas, and don’t forget, DeShawn can play PG in a pinch, and Miller and Butler can both initiate offense. I guess maybe I just have a soft spot for NY, but I still think he can play a role on this team…
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The problem is that Foye flopped big-time as a PG in Minnesota
My conversations with the Hoopus guys make me think Flip would use Foye as a SG coming off screens, not a PG, but who knows.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But couldn't he play the 6th man role and maybe 12-15 min a game at PG?
He doesn’t need to be the main man. That was the problem in MN, I thought.
I guess we might be in trouble if Arenas goes down again and Foye has to start — but having Critt wouldn’t save us if that happens anyway.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Possibly
But then I feel like you need to trade Young, unfortunately.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because he won't get enough minutes?
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
And he’s the best asset we got outside of Butler, McGee and Blatche.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think sg
pretty sure they brought him in for sg duties. any pg duties will probably go to james or critt. but i do think he is our starting sg
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought Miller would start at SG, not Foye.
Foye is undersized to play SG for 30 minutes a game. Foye+Arenas in the backcourt is a defensive nightmare
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
but when have you heard defense and wizards in the same sentence…well i guess that was the eddie jordan era…possibly different in the saunders era, i guess we’ll have to see
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's mainly the size thing, not whether he's a good defender.
If both Gil and Foye start we would get destroyed by the opposing SG on a nightly basis. Plus, I’m not so sure Foye isn’t going to be backing Gil up. You are right that we will have to wait and see….
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And yes NY may have more value to other teams
But the key here is really James – it would be a salary dump for whomever we trade with.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If OKC trades Thabeet
How bout James straight up for Collison? Same salaries, but Collison lasts until 2011. We take on a bit of money, but improve our frontcourt.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's good.
Always liked Collison. But can he body up defensively? Given that neither Jamison nor McGee are solid defenders against big bodies, we REALLY need someone who can’t get pushed around. Not sure if that’s Collison.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like it, but even with Thabeet, OKC is still pretty thin up front and Collison played a big role for them last year. Doubt it they would be comfortable letting him go with Thabeet being so raw.
by iRONLiON on Jun 23, 2009 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Worth It?
Is taking on an extra year of salary worth it for Nick Collison?
He helps in the short term, but he limits our flexibility to get a free agent that summer while also resigning Brendan. Ultimately, the question is whether you want to pay MORE for Collison when we could have just kept Darius
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're probably right
I doubt the Wiz take on post-2010 salary, which will limit their options for sure.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pissed off post, should disregard
Gather up the pitchforks ladies and gents, our GM turned 17 wins into one year of Mike Miller and some Randy guy who’s most famous for making Portlands GM look really smart. I’m digging around for my pair of rose-hued glasses, after all I’ might as well have a smile on my face while I’m spending 200 hours watching this team, but what the hell.
Let me ask, what was your split-second gut reaction when you first saw the news? Mine was somewhere between nausea dizziness and gasping for air. FUCK
by morethesamewiz on Jun 23, 2009 11:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah my gut reaction was just hoping that
either we were keeping Songaila or we were getting the #18 or #28 also. It’s not a total disaster, though I think we might have been able to do better.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look at it this way. If a 21 year old Foye was in this years draft we would be considered lucky to nab him at 5. This way we don’t need to wait for him to develop, plus Miller minus bad contracts.
by iRONLiON on Jun 23, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
I think thats overlooked by most people.
Its doubtful that any of the guards (even Rubio) would give you wnat Foye will give you this year. Its a question of long term vs short term and I am cool with the decision EG made because if things don’t work out with the big 3 then we should easily be able to cash them out for picks and young talent.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a good point
Foye is probably just as good as most of the guards that we would have been able to get at 5. He obviously can play in the NBA and should contribute this year, whereas I’m not sure that any other draft pick would have played major minutes.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
frontcourt thin?
How is the frontcourt thinner? Etan would barely play, and Darius would be at 10 min a night best. And unfortunately, Songaila defined “replacement level” player. I can’t imagine we can’t find a Joel Anthony-esque frontcourt reserve who is focused on defense only and will be good for six fouls.
by mfish on Jun 23, 2009 11:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good point
now that i think about what you said…that’s very true
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's thinner in bodies
But not necessarily quality. Put it this way; the roster is imbalanced.
“Decimated” wasn’t the right word.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They don't call it summer for nothing Senor
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Underestimating Darius
I feel like most people who watched us play alot last year should recognize that Darius was actually a real key to your front court. Admittedly, being a key to the front court of the team with the 2nd worst record in the league is no great shakes, but he could hit open jumpers and was a surprisingly capable defender. His skill set is not easy to replace, but you are right that we should be able to find a Joel Anthony kinda backup player.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know this is irritating
But I bet that Andres Nocioni would be greatly available. I’m sure the Kings WOULD LOVE to dump his contract for Mike James. They would do that in a heartbeat. However, I’m pretty sure the Wiz could take back money like that for a better player available. I’m just not sure how many the Wiz would be able to dump and get the ideal replacement.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Another perimeter player doesn't do much for me
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whose gonna give Washington a post player?
Other than Zach Randolph, and would you even want him (I can’t imagine why), what difference does that make?
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meh, we can find a backup with MJ's expiring deal, Young, etc
The following guys would seem to be attainable:
-Ronny Turiaf
-Tony Battie
-Collison
-Kris Humphries
-Udonis Haslem (if Miami goes into all-out 2010 mode)
-Darko
-Rasho Nesterovic (as a FA)
-Jeff Foster
-Kurt Thomas
-Eduardo Najera
-Gortat
-Pryzbilla
-Diop
We could go a bit more expensive and get someone like Kaman or Dampier too.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wouldn't mind
seeing haslem. foster or gortat in a wiz uni or even prysbilla
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't know why you would want Turiaf
But, of those guys, NIck Collison would be a guy I would want. But, with Haywood and Blatche, I’m not sure what he does.
I would be shocked if Washington doesn’t look to getting another SF/PF in the draft.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the Wiz are weak at the 3
I don’t see a single player helping you there though. But, that clearly isn’t what you believe.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have an Allstar at SF
Butler. Plus Dominic McGuire. We aren’t weak unless Butler gets shipped out.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus Miller can play SF if needed
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Equally as important
But, yeah, I knew I shouldn’t have suggested Noc when I said it.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yuh
That was dumb. My bad.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Miller also can slide over
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 23, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well Foye doesn't have to be the man anymore
so this might be a great move for him.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 23, 2009 11:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Reply button isnt working on my computer?
Re: Rook’s post— I will readily admit I may be being irrational, but if we got Amare I’d rather keep Miller at the 2 and start McGuire or Jamison at 3 (I know Jamison at 3 hasn’t worked before but Flip is a genius, so who knows?) I’m probably just bitter at the fact that my usernname would be irrelevant.
...one of those guys who reads all the time but barely comments
by Juice over Whine on Jun 23, 2009 11:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
plus
playing alongside better guys should improve his game and get him better shot
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Figures
I spend 3 hours writing up an article on the Second Round prospects… and the Wizards go and make a trade ….
1. Makes my whole article moot… since 4 of the guys I had on the list were Guards.
2. Nobody cares about 2nd Round picks – when there’s a major trade to talk about….
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 23, 2009 11:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But it's still very important
I’ll bet the Wiz still try to get one player off that list Prada has just up top your comment, Rook, and the Wiz will try to get a PF in the 2nd round.
I think people think this is totally a PG draft, but I believe Geoff Petrie said it best: There is depth at the PG and PF. It’s a good thing the Wiz need PF’s now.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I saw your post
and realized exactly how irrelevant it became the minute the trade was made. Ha. Still, now we need a post on possible low post prospects in the 2nd rnd. Get cracking!
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 23, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
kinda like demarre carroll
saw a game or two of his on tv…looked decent, similar to a blatche i think except with some more meat on him
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Working on it right now...
All PF and Centers….
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 23, 2009 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kudos on the post
It was good and it would still be really relevant except that we obviously aren’t going to draft a guard. Maybe we can draft & stash Calathes though ..
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm excited for next year
If Miller starts, our starting lineup should be improved, at least offensively. And having Foye as a 6th man will be huge. Wiz are much improved with this trade. Sure the pick could have brought in a nice player, but remember how bad this draft is supposed to be. There’s a very good chance whatever player we would have drafted would be a flop.
by iRONLiON on Jun 23, 2009 11:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My take in a nutshell
1) If Rubio slips to 5 this trade sucks
2) Otherwise it’s fine, but not the homerun we were hoping for (Amare, Bosh, Heinrich, Howard, Prince). If SA can get Jefferson for popcorn, why do we have to pay fair market value?
by MR on Jun 23, 2009 11:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The problem is that the Spurs had 2 players who weren't going to be owed all their money if they were waived by a certain day
I don’t think the Wiz have a player like that.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 23, 2009 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spurs Trade
Was fairly awful IMO. They basically cashed in their most valuable assets for a volume shooter who is owed $30mil over 2 years. San Antonio is banking on being able to re-sign 2/3 of the guys they traded for the veterans minimum and hoping desperately that the addition of Jefferson will get them a championship next year and was worth crippling their cap.
I don’t see how Jefferson makes the Spurs better than the Lakers, Magic, Celtics, or Nuggets…
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Those non-guaranteed deals are gold in this climate. The Spurs could have done better. Why didn’t they try to get Vince Carter instead?
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't
think bad about anything the Spurs do. They seem to come up with some pretty crafty things year in and out. Besides, they’re in a win now mode, and Jefferson gives them a legit 3rd option in the starting unit, with Ginobli coming off the bench. Then they don’t need Roger Mason to start which, in my mind, is better as he’s much more dangerous coming in as a spot up shooter.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
heinrich and prince
were a big possibliity esp since detroit wants more size and we were willing to give up lots of ours. would’ve been more happy to see either of those two here
by theintz on Jun 23, 2009 11:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Prince, Hinrich & Rip
All have bad contracts!! Why should we completely limit our options for the off season and prevent ourselves from resigning Haywood just so we can add a 5th starter who isn’t THAT much better than the TWO players we got in this trader.
Prince and Heinrich may fit better in our team than Foye and Miller, but Foye and Miller came cheaply and don’t limit our salary cap flexibility. If Hinrich would have gotten us to the finals, then I’d agree about cashing our chips in for him, but there is no way that he would have done that (still pissed he was drafted just before Jarvis Hayes though).
by Manimal Smith on Jun 23, 2009 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
because
although they aren’t that much better, “that” much can be the difference between winning and losing. you’re right in that foye and miller were cheap but i think having hinrich or prince would’ve upped our ability to become a championship contender. besides abe wants to win now considering his health, i don’t think he minds a few bad contracts (example:gilbert arenas)
by theintz on Jun 24, 2009 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stuck with Hinrich?
Do you really want to be stuck with Hinrich for 3 years and no real options to retool? He is on the books for 3 more seasons and is just as expensive as Miller. If we traded for him then the best we could be the in 10/11 is the same team we are in 09/10. As our team stands right now we get to add some missing pieces and then retool after the season and maybe even add another max contract (though we couldn’t keep Brendan in that case)
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We can't add a max contract in 2010
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not?
Miller = 9.75m
Foye = 3.5m
Mike James = 6.46m
Brendan = 6m
Total coming off the books = 25.71m
We’d have to fill out our roster with minimum salaried players, but we could do it right or does it depend on the salary cap for that year?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure of the exact numbers........
but just because you have x amount of dollars coming off the cap doesn’t mean you automatically have x dollars to spend on an outside free agent. If you sign someone from another team you can only offer them whatever you are under the cap(with the midlevel exception being exactly that an exception). Since we are over the cap but under the luxury cap and with the salary cap numbers potentially dropping alot after next season(being based on the money made 2 seasons before so it would be the first season that takes into account the economic downturn) we might not have alot of room for someone off the street barring a sign and trade which are difficult.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 24, 2009 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also
I think that factored alot into Grunfeld signing AJ and Gilbert cuz if he let one go away he couldn’t replace with an appreciable player from the outside.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 24, 2009 1:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 1:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'd have around 56 million committed in salaries
And that’s without Haywood, Foye or Miller. The cap’s probably coming in around 65 million. So that’s nine million to spend on free agents. (These are very rough guestimates based on our current situation). Hardly enough to sign a max free agent.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 1:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotcha, though we can clear a bit more
By not making qualifying offers to Javaris and NY. Probably a silly thing to do, but its an option.
If we only have 9 mil to sign Brendan, then I can’t see us doing much more than that. Does this mean that our best chance is really this year?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 1:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's nine million to spend on free agents, then re-sign Brendan on top because we have his Bird Rights
Of course, that nine million is divided up into only nine players, counting Foye, Critt and Nick, so we still have to fill out a roster. It basically comes nowhere close to helping us with a max free agent.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 1:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ya - no max guy. MLE this year?
That was a misunderstanding of the system on my part (and an underestimation of what happens with our escalating contracts) and I get it now.
If we still have the MLE available this year and we are really going for it, then is there a free agent we could actually nab with a shorter term deal?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh - wait
Free Agents count against the Salary Cap
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q29
A team’s free agents continue to count as team salary (against the salary cap). This charge is called the “free agent amount.” So there may not be enough money under the cap to sign another team’s free agent, because the team’s own free agents are taking up all their cap room.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 2:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh?
So when these guys come off the cap next year they don’t really come off the cap until someone else signs them?
That can’t be right can it?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a cap hold
So yeah, it’s right. My bad.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 2:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Renounce
I could see the Wizards renouncing everyone except Haywood… depending on how much Miller wanted to re-sign, and whether Foye fits in here.
If he’s not moved in a Trade Deadline trade, Mike James will almost certainly be renounced.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm learning alot today
I had no idea of the formalities involved. What rights are there to actually renounce with respect to an unrestricted free agent though?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 2:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This site explains a lot about the CBA
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 2:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would have been happy trading 5 and filler for Rip Hamilton. Prince is kinda redundant with Caron.
by iRONLiON on Jun 23, 2009 11:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hollinger
Anyone got his reaction to the trade?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 12:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm linking it tomorrow
There’s really not much in there that we didn’t already know. He seems most surprised that the Wizards are going for a talent upgrade and paying the tax for it, but people here have been saying that ever since the trade deadline.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why don't these "experts" understand basics?
Its easy to figure out that the Wiz could only have gotten under the cap this year by finding a few of the very small number of non-guaranteed contracts out there. We made our bed last February and then signed an expensive coach while risking paying for our old one still. This stuff is OBVIOUS, why can’t people whose entire job it is to think about these things figure it out …
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 12:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We got FLEECED
I don’t see how we come out EVEN, let alone ahead, in this deal. We basically traded all our “assets”, minus the (semi) big 3. Now we have 2 more shooting guards to add to the mix. I’m sorry, 1 and a HALF SG’s. Foye is undersized at that position. And Miller? That’s ALL we get? An undersized SG who might be an underdeveloped PG, and a journeyman 3 point shooter? I can’t believe we gave up the 5th pick for that, let alone 3 players. Thomas’ expiring contract would’ve been a huge bargaining chip at the trade deadline if nothing else. Our only low post scorer off the bench in Songalia, and NO size in return. I can’t believe we couldn’t at least get ONE of Minnesota’s 3 draft picks to go along with their garbage. I don’t see any way that this gets us to where we want to be. Better? Maybe. but good enough to beat Cleveland, Orlando, Boston, or even Chicago and Atlanta? No way. We’re gonna be throwing up all over the place when Harden and/or Evans becomes an all-star. And now we have to lead the league in 6’4" players. UGH!!
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
oh yeah
I’m still holding out hope that Etan will refuse to sign off on the deal, or Minnesota will bring in another team. Though I don’t know why. They’ve done a pretty good job decimating us already. Another team would probably come in and take McGee or Young for nothing.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Etan refuses
He gives up the 15% trade kicker (approx $1.2 Million) he’ll be due from Minnesota.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah he's never getting another decent contract again
and I’m sure he has plenty of plans on how to spend his money when he retires. No way in hades he rejects that.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 24, 2009 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually his trade kicker is 6 Mil....
which is 15% of his total contract. It has to be paid out by the T-Wolves now. It doesn’t count against their cap though. It’s basically a fat relocation bonus. Thats why his contract was so hard to move. The 1.2 was just so he owuld sign something. Bsically he got 7.2 mil on top of his salary to be traded. Ridiculous.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 24, 2009 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
Everybody needs to read this and fully absorb it. The probable reason we did not get back as much value as we hoped was because of how extremely difficult it was to get another team to take on Etan and his miserable contract, trade kicker and all. Minnesota is basically going to pay a worthless player (harsh, but true) $14.5 million to sit at the end of the bench next season or even become deactivated. His gives them no value on the court, and his value as an expiring contract was partially negated by his trade kicker.
The one thing we can rejoice of because of this trade is that we finally have the Etan Thomas albatross off of this team’s back.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 24, 2009 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
According to what I've read - this is wrong
According to NBA Salary Cap FAQ
Teams are permitted to write a bonus called a “trade bonus” (sometimes referred to as a “trade kicker”) into contracts. This bonus is paid to the player when he is traded, but only upon his first trade and not upon any subsequent trades (in the case of a sign-and-trade, they don’t count the initial trade when the contract is signed). The trade bonus can be defined as a specific dollar amount, a specific percentage of the remaining value of the contract, or some combination (e.g., “$1 million or 10% of the remaining value of the contract, whichever is less”). In either case, the actual amount cannot exceed 15% of the remaining value of the contract.
The remaining value of Etan’s contract was $7,350,000
15% of that is $1,102,500 (plus whatever was left of his 2008-09 salary – 6 days? in June)
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's six million over the course of the contract, not all at once
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are missing the point
Etan’s expiring contract was actually replaced with TWO expiring contracts and we managed to shave salary for the next offseason when we have important free agent work to do.
Foye will be more productive next year than anyone we would get at #5 and Miller is actually productive and adds 3 point shooting we need while Etan was just filling a roster spot.
I think we are already better than Chicago and Atlanta and that we always play Cleveland tought, Orlando might lose key players and Boston is getting old.
This move doesn’t move us to the top of the East, but it makes us a solid #4/5 team again.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought
the point was to get better EVERY year. The deal for Stoudemire trumped this. And I disagree that Foye would be better than Harden or Evans. Minnesota didn’t even know what position to play him at. Now, if he starts, we have a starting backcourt of two 6’4" shooters who can’t defend. And if he DOESN’T start, that means that Deshawn Stevenson starts. UGH!! And you won’t convince me that Miller off the bench is better that Songalia off the bench. Low post vs. streaky shooter? Not a chance. I understand about the contracts, but I would’ve rather us use the 5 pick on a player that can help us in the long run, not to trade it for a future trade option.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't this make us better this year?
We just turned 2 players that didn’t play, Darius and a pick that’s primary value would have been in 2-3 seasons into help in the back court that we desperately needed.
This isn’t a grand slam perfect deal like getting Gasol for free, but you can’t you agree that Miller + Foye are better (for next season only) than Etan, Pech, Darius and a rookie?
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we don't
know about the rookie yet. We didn’t think Devin Harris was going to bbe anything great. now he’s an all star. And i disagree with your assesment on Darius. While I didn’t mind shopping him, I did think he had value. He was a legit threat off the bench to get you 12-14 points and 6-8 rebounds with no plays run for him.
Anyway, like I’ve said before, I think Harden will be a very good player, and Evans could end up being a good to great one. I guess I have to hope I’m wrong on both counts.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really like Darius
Indeed, the first thing I thought when I saw this trade was that I was pissed we had to give him up to make the salaries match. I disagree that Darius had that much trade value though, he makes too much money and isn’t athletic enough to perk the interest of other teams.
Harris became an all star in his 4th (?) year. If we were planning to wait that long on whomever we drafted, then they wouldn’t be playing with our core players. You are right that keeping the pick made better long term sense, but trading it got us much needed veteran help, much needed salary cap relief for the future AND salary cap relief for this season – thats a pretty good trifecta for a GM to achieve.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again
The Wizards would NEVER have drafted Devin Harris – they drafted Harris specifically for Dallas to make the Jamison trade…
If you want to make the analogy – use Luol Deng – that is who the Wizards would have drafted.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or Iguodala
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand this
I wasn’t saying we should have drafted him. I still thinnk we came out ahead on that trade. My point was, we got rid of that pick because we thought it was a weak draft, then it turns out an all star gets picked in that spot. But at least that time we ended up with a legitimate star.
And yes, I realize he didn’t become an all star until his 4th year (how long did it take Jamison), but he was still a pretty damned good player. Frankly, I don’t care that much about the actual all star moniker. There are always 4 or 5 players every year who could’ve made the team.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AND
In his first year for Dallas, Devin Harris averaged 15 minutes, 5.7 points, and 2.2 assists.
His second year for Dallas, he averaged 23 minutes, 10 points and 2.3 assists….
His third year for Dallas, he averaged 26 minutes, 10 points, and 3.7 assists….
In the meantime, the veteran Antawn Jamison was putting up 20-9 and going to the All-Star game.
So CJ – you’re making the point for those of us who think that the Wizard’s window of opportunity is NOW – and we cannot wait for the development of a draft pick (no matter how high)… That it’s better to trade that draft pick for two veterans that can help RIGHT NOW.
Perhaps in 3 or 4 years, that 5th pick will be a pretty good player – in the meantime, 4 years from now, Jamison will be 37, Butler 33 and Arenas 31.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Darius
Averaged 7.4 points and 2.9 boards a game last year. That’s with him starting nearly 30 games. If you’re expecting 12-14 and 6-8 from him then that’s absolutely unrealistic. Maybe once a month or so.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 24, 2009 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe
I said threat, not average. He has had many 12-14/6-8 rebound games. And the hustle plays make a huge difference as well.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Songaila
had only 9 games where he had 6 or more rebounds…. and he never had more than 8.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Songaila rebounding
he had 27 games of 1 or fewer rebounds
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right - about once a month he would have a big (for him) game
I’ll miss him, but he’s not a dealbreaker. The real problem is that we need to pick up more frontcourt depth now. I don’t like losing the guy, but why hold up the deal over him?
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 24, 2009 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A guy with averages only around half of what you are saying he's capable of
isn’t going to have “many” of those games.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 24, 2009 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK
so I don’t have his numbers in front of me. But you’re taking last years numbers. Well, to stay with that, last year Mike Miller had his worst year ever. Why? they said he deferred too much to Al Jefferson, passing up tons of shots to do so. Al Jefferson??? So what is he going to do with 3 good scorers around him?
Look, I never said I wanted to keep Songalia. What I said is that what he has given what we gave up, including what Darius has given us, is morew than we got in return. Yes, Songalia got in the game before the young guys, taking minutes from them. butthat had as much to do with them not TAKING the minutes from him as anything else. Blatche, and probably even McGee, gave you better scoring than Songalia. But they didn’t do the grind work that he did. Now they HAVE to, cuz there’s nobody left to do it. Foye is too small, and Miller will be busy tucking his hair in his headband.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 2:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon
You’re the same guy who suggested that we trade for Shaq. We would have had to toss out at least as much in contracts as well as the pick to bring back an over the hill center.
And I wouldn’t disparage Al Jefferson considering he was the top piece in the Garnett trade, and considered one of the best young bigs in the NBA before he blew out his ACL.
Third, I was Darius’ number one defender, but it is ludicrous to say that one Darius Songalia is better than Mike Miller and Randy Foye.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 24, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correction
I believe I was Uncle Darius’ number one defender.
For all the #%@* I took for it, I believe i deserve the title.
by MR on Jun 24, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we can co-own that
You and I made ALL the unicorn jokes.
We should go back through the BF archives and track all the anti-Songalia rhetoric and show how revisionist history works.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 24, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think both of you will like what I'm planning on writing tonight
You two and Truth.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I forgot Truth
We should have formed a club while we had the chance.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 24, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Count Me in on the Bandwagon
I was looking at on/off stats all of last season, and based on those, D-Song was one of our best players. His adjusted +/- ranks him the 3rd best player on the Wizards the past two seasons combined, better than even Caron Butler’s overall contributions. This for a guy who was constantly getting ragged on for not putting up enough rebounds, despite the fact that as a team, the Wizards rebounded the ball just as well when he was on the court as they did when he was off.
I wish we could have gotten more value for D-Song, honestly, but I’m sure the T-Wolves weren’t going to give up two good players without getting at least one valuable player in return.
And Andray Blatche better put it together consistently this season, or he is done.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 24, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Manimal makes good points
Besides, it was the 5th pick in a really bad draft. What did you expect?
by iRONLiON on Jun 24, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All the talk of Amare inflated people's expectations
Everyone heard names like Amare, Richard Jefferson, Vince Carter, Manu Ginobili etc. and got really excited.
The more I think about it, the more impressed I am that we were able to get the package of players that we did, while remaining cap neutral for this year, shaving salary in 10/11 and preserving our collection of expiring contracts.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great
so, coming off the 2nd worse record in the league (or maybe 3rd, don’t remember off hand) all we have to show for it is being the league leader in expiring contracts. This makes last years suffering worthless. At least if we had used the pick we could’ve croosed our fingers for a future star. I would’ve rather rolled the dice with that than pick up two journeymen.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair Enough
You are right that we can’t really know if we made the right move until we know how good the player we would have drafted would be, but I really think that the first 8-9 guys in the rotation on this team are the best that they have been in a LONG time.
by Manimal Smith on Jun 24, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
griffin is the only surefire "future star"
Everyone else is a crapshoot in this draft. Ernie and Flip want to win this year, not 3 years down the road when Evans/Harden/Curry or whomever would have been picked gets through his growing pains.
Don’t forget, Ernie will almost certainly make another move. It’s too early to fully evaluate this trade until that happens.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 24, 2009 12:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
win this year
with what? We didn’t add a surefire starter. If anything, we got worse on defense (if that’s even possible). And we gave away 4 players for 2, who may not even be on the team next year.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Miller has been a starter his entire career
With a Career PER around 16… Career TS% in the high 50’s… An absolutely stone cold deadly 3-point shooter. One of the best rebounding Guards in the League, and a pretty good passer as well.
Hardly what I’d call a “journeyman”…
Mike James is a “journeyman”. DeShawn Stevenson is a “journeyman”. Juan Dixon is a “journeyman”.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
again
I’m not saying he can’t score. But he won’t get the touches here. He will be 4th option at best.
And Orlando-Memphis-Minnesota-Washinton= JOURNEYMAN. I don’t care how you sliceit. As for being a starter for his entire career. This is true. He has been a starter for some very bad teams. And they keep getting rid of him, as will we.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So
Shaq is a “journeyman”?
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Orlando-Los Angeles-Miami-Phoenix = JOURNEYMAN?
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon
If you even compare the benches of the previous Wizards playoff teams, and this years projected bench – even without factoring in a FA signing or Mike James trade, we are miles ahead. Pech didn’t play, Thomas didn’t play.
If at the end of the day our 10 and 11th man are Stevenson and the 32 pick, I will be THRILLED.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Jun 24, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foye isn't a journeyman
Next year will be his 4th year in the league. He’s played for the T-wolves all 3 previous years and has improved each year.
by 7Swords of Salat on Jun 24, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not yet he's not.
But with the expiring contract, he’s likely to move. The Blazers drafted him, swindled the Wolves into giving them Brandon Roy for him, and now the Wolves realized that hhe doesn’t make them better. He’s improved each year, yes. Being the 2nd or 3rd option on a bad team. Now he will be the 4th option at best; meaning not as many looks, meaning not as many points, meaning the only thing he’s good at (scoring) we’ve just reduced. I reiterate what I’ve said plenty of times before. We have enough scoring. We have enough 1 dimensional guards, we need something else.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone we get is at best a 4th option unless...
we trade one of the big three. So that isn’t a criticism. For a little perspective I think both Miller and Foye were taken somewhere in the 5-7 range and they were successful draft picks. Everything I’ve read about Harden says smart palyer with a ceiling on his athletic talent. The other guys are athletes without the “smarts.” We have that guy already, he’s named Nick Young.
We desperately, needed a guard to fill the sucking black hole we have at 2 guard — Dom, D. Steve, NY = suck for any team pretending to playoff aspirations. This gives us two guys with real talent at that spot who have played in the league.
by NeverNervousPervis on Jun 24, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think an underrated aspect of this trade
is that we didn’t mortgage our future. Miller is expiring – so if things go terribly wrong then we can hopefully dump him at the deadline for some young talent or future picks. Foye is cheap and we can decide later whether to keep him. Either way, at a minimum getting rid of Songaila’s contract makes it easier to pay Haywood next year. Let’s not panic just yet…
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 24, 2009 12:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I maintain
that I would have been able to stomach this trade a little better if we could have gotten one of their THREE 1st rounders.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 1:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
no doubt in my mind that this makes us BETTER…. we traded two worthless assets, a decent backup player, and a 5th pick in an awful draft… foye will definitely be better than harden/curry… we improved our team and lost nothing.
by vail on Jun 24, 2009 1:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
'10-'11 lottery pick
Its guaranteed with this package even if its not spelled out in the contract. If we had taken Hinrich, or Prince, or any of the other quality known-quantity marginal stars that were available then we might have fallen out of the lottery. Good thinking Ern
by morethesamewiz on Jun 24, 2009 1:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
mike miller is much better than songalia ever will be
by vail on Jun 24, 2009 1:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't know if you guys want to hear from another Wolves fan
But here it goes:
I like this trade for the Wolves, but not because I necessarily think we got the better end of the talent deal. But Miller and Foye were never going to be a part of a winning Wolves team. The Wovles are bad. They need great players. While it’s unlikely the 5 turns into that, they are in a position where rolling the dice makes sense when they aren’t dealing their core players (Jefferson, Love).
Here’s what you are getting: Foye has some talent. His ideal role is as a bench scorer. He really can’t play the point, but he is undersized at the 2. He can’t defend either position well enough to be a starter on an upper echelon team. He’ll hit some 3s, but isn’t a pure shooter. He’s a volume guy. Somewhat similar to Ben Gordon.
Mike Miller…had a weird season. As others have pointed out, he bizarrely refused to shoot the ball last year, for reasons that remain unknown. He did a lot of things for the Wolves; he tried to be a veteran stability, fill the gaps guy for a bad team. He didn’t complain. He’s a pro. If he starts shooting open shots again, he’ll help you. He also can’t really guard anyone, but rebounds well for his size, passes well, and can obviously shoot. If he’s your 4th best player, that’s pretty good.
I can’t see how your team is actually going to stop anyone next season, but I wish you all the best of luck.
PS—I’m shocked the Wolves were able to do this without giving up one of their later picks, which now I hope can be used in other deals.
by Eric in Madison on Jun 24, 2009 1:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I for one really hope Mike Miller cuts his hair. That slick back semi pony tail style is irritating as hell.
by Fundefined on Jun 24, 2009 1:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I feel kind of ambivalent about this trade
I’m not super confident that this is a team that is a championship contender this year. It would obviously be great to make a nice playoff run(remember most of our team hasn’t played with each other due to the last two trades and Haywood and Arenas being out all year) this year and then make a big run in 2010-2011.
One one hand this might give us the extra room to re-sign haywood but it also might not. Alot of teams are shedding cap space next year but there are more teams than superstars so some GM’s are gonna be left with alot of loot and being forced to spend it on their 3rd or 4th options(rather than explain how two years of gutting the roster netted them no free agents) and a 7 foot center who could average 10 and 8 this year might get a huge contract. So basically we are trading 2 years of Foye with a restricted year for #5 who would be signed to a cheap rookie contract for 4 years and then our option to restrict. The extra money earned by having a starter on a rookie contract could be huge 3 years from now when Jamison’s contract ballons. But you could also think of it as in this crappy draft we should get 2 solid years and the option to restrict on Foye for sure and might not be able to count on 2 solid years from any of the projects in the draft.
As for the fun sutff, the actual basketball, I think Foye and Arenas can play well together but they would be best served having Foye come off the bench and playing them together when they can get away with it defensively. I think he should also be the 2 as it seems that he is more comfortable there. With his shooting and Critt’s size and speed I think they could play well together and Critt has the size to cover 2’s. I haven’t seen enough of him to comment on his defense but the always dubious Hollinger and others seem to think he is above average. He can score and pass a little and he can be THE MAN of the second unit.
Miller is a nice piece on a playoff team. He can spread the floor and is smart with ball and will show up to play. I’m not too worried about last year but I don’t expect much from his. Plus his salary is our best asset once the 6 months pass. If we are a bad team he won’t add much though.
I’m assuming EG has another trade and would love some high-energy bruiser as it is tough to find good low post scorers. I was ready to take Patty Mills with our 2nd rounder but now I’m hoping we can trade witha contract. Teams love those early seconds becuase you can get basically a first round player but at a way better contract. I’m intrigued to see what EG does.
As for defensively it doesn’t make us any worse as Etan didn’t play enough to improve the D and the others aren’t great defenders. Foye could give us imrpoved D especially against PG’s. Like I said though it will be best to match him with someone who can cover the 2. The real jump in defense though will come from our own roster. Haywood is coming back and after years of hating on him he has turned himself into a good defensive center. Also Blatche, McGee and McGuire could step their games up. I mean those 4 can produce alot of blocked shots. 3 of those guys are big ifs though.
by BayAreaBullet on Jun 24, 2009 2:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Foye - defense
John Hollinger says that “Foye is a strong defender at the point — he’s big for the position but also can move his feet and cut off penetration. Because of his strength he can also defend shooting guards, and as he gains more experience he should be an above-average defender at both positions.” (ESPN Insider required)
Yet, most of the Minnesota fans posting here say that Foye is a terrible defender…..
I’ve not paid that much attention, even when the Wizards were playing the Timberwolves – so I don’t have any previous knowledge base to form an opinion….
Anyone here have any stats on Foye that show what kind of defender he is?
How about Adjusted plus-minus…. that seems to be the latest fad stat….
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 2:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
all I've ever heard
on Foye is that he’s not as good defender, couldn’t make it at PG, so they put him at shooting guard, and at 6’4", comes in undersized at that position.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 3:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foye isn't the defensive calamity he was as a rookie
At best he’s a nonfactor defensively, though. Randy Wittman about split the veins in his forehead over Foye’s defense and point guard decision making last year. The two Randys are having a little reunion now.
The barest hesitation, the slightest show of the ball his rookie year, and Foye was ten feet off the ground. He’s worked on not getting the hook set too much with pump fakes.
by feral on Jun 24, 2009 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's funny
I was listening to the Sports Junkies this morning, and they mentioned how Minnesota had an awful coach, which contributed to Mike Miller having his worse year. I don’t think they know that that “awful coach” beat Miller here.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Would Blame McHale More Than Wittman
Miller played only 17 games for Wittman before Wittman got fired. Interestingly, the knock on Miller while with Minnesota was that he did not shoot enough. He averaged 1.6 field goal attempts per 36 minutes more under Wittman than he did under McHale. So there is hope that Wittman will let Miller chuck it a bit more.
While chucking is usually a bad thing, when the guy has a lifetime 3-point percentage of 40.1% and a lifetime True Shooting percentage of 57.4%, chucking can be a very good thing for us.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 24, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More
More awesome sources for analysis. Friends, radio announcers. Maybe we get lucky and Conan O’Brien comments tonight.
by Jheiser3 on Jun 24, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I listen to the Junkies too, but they are clueless when it comes to the Wizards. I cringe every time the subject switches to the Wizards, because I know they are going to make more uninformed comments than even Kornheiser would.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 24, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good overall move, and leaves wiz with some options
Don’t forget that management is making their bid to compete NOW, and that one of their goals was to minimize luxury tax this year — the wiz just dumped the cost of a first round pick and actually gained $100K in salary this year and almost $5 million next, while improving significantly. Pech doesn’t belong in the NBA. Etan is done, unfortunately. Darius is a servicable backup, but not worth the money owed him.
We’re definitely gambling on Javale, but Blatche is a quality back-up now, and should still be improving. The depth in the backcourt is a good thing. James shouldn’t even smell the court, and as of last year Crittendon wasn’t ready to help win anything (yet — he still may get there). And who knows if Deshawn can still be the (mediocre) player he was before last year. Miller will probably play some 3, and McGuire should fill in at the 3 & 4. One 4/5 type backup would probably make me comfortable — and there’s a pretty good chance we can get that via the early-2nd rounder or a league-minimum signing.
The wiz should hang on to James for now, I think — his expiring contract will buy more near the trade deadline than now, and by then we’ll know if this team has a shot and what’s really needed. Management seems committed to giving the big 3 their shot, so I don’t think any major deal is in the works, but that option is there too. Keep in mind, Miller has a huge expiring contract, and that could become a major asset if he or the team isn’t doing well by the trade deadline.
That’s really the best part about this deal — the wiz kept their young players with potential, and added some alternative talent to the big 3. If the team as currently conceived isn’t able to deliver they should be able to rebuild around Arenas next year.
I know everyone gets excited about draft picks, but for every Roy or Wade there are several busts. This is a weak draft, and scouting outside of sure-things is pretty much a crapshoot. For every Roy or Wade there are several busts or future journeymen. I really wouldn’t bet on any specific player after Griffin even starting for the majority of their career. Not even Thabeet or Rubio. I could easily see those guys turning into Adonal Foyle and Carlos Arroyo.
This was a smart move, I think.
by steadyhand on Jun 24, 2009 2:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
to me
this trade was done to shed money. It MIGHT have made us marginally better for the regular season. But in the playoffs, you need a post presence. While we still probably would’ve picked up a perimeter player in the draft, I maintain that the upside of Harden, Evans, or even Derozan looks better than that of Foye. Miller has hit his ceiling, and Foye may have also. Everyone keeps touting their scoring potential, but that was in Minnesota (or Memphis/Orlando in Miller’s case), where they had the ball in their hands more. They won’t have it as much here, so their scoring average is likely to go down.
Look, the bottom line is for me is, I was excited about our prospects of improving in the offseason. We’ve gone too many offseason’s without doing it. With our core, having a lottery pick seemed like icing. I was really hoping to land a guy with the potential to be a star. It happens every year, a guy exceeds expectations. It’s never happened to us, so I guess I figured we were do. This trade nixes that opportunity, thus taking away the excitement of the offseason. Coming into the summer, we were a 4th or 5th seed team with our guys healthy. With this trade, we’re still a 4th or 5th seed. We didn’t get better than Orlando, Cleveland, or Boston. Would a draft pick have done that for us? Odds are against it. But if James Harden turns into the next Paul Pierce, or Evans turns into the next Brandon Roy, then we would’ve leapfrogged those other teams, and been better off int he long run. I know that’s a lot of ifs, and the bad luck we’ve had makes them even less likely, but hey, that’s why it’s exciting. To me, landing a guy whose undersized at the 2 spot and another guy 3 other teams didn’t want- not that exciting. I’m holding out hope for another move. Maybe shed enough salsry to make a FA run at David Lee or something. but this trade does nothign for me.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 2:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It is not a homerun trade for sure....
But it begins to address some of the team’s truly glaring weaknesses without damaging its core.
In case anyone has forgotten, we finished last season with a backcourt of James, Young, Crittenton and Dixon.
Miller and Foye are better than all of them, way better.
I like watching Nick Young play when he is hot, but obviously Randy Foye can get as hot more often (16 ppg vs 10 ppg last year). Miller is one of the NBA’s better three-point shooters and can move the ball around without turning it over.
I am sure EG will find an equally suitable big man, as it certainly will not be that great a challenge to improve on Etan, Pech and Darius.
by khrabb on Jun 24, 2009 6:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nick Young didn't get the minutes Randy Foye got...
Randy Foye can get as hot more often (16 ppg vs 10 ppg last year).
Nick Young = 19.4 ppg per 40 minutes (44.4% shooting percentage; 53% TSP)
Randy Foye = 18.3 ppg per 40 minutes (40.7% shooting percentage; 51.7% TSP)
Nick Young = 6’7"
Randy Foye = 6’4"
Randy Foye does more than just score?
Nick Young = 3.3 Rebounds per game per 40 minutes
Randy Foye = 3.4 Rebounds per game per 40 minutes
The only thing that Randy Foye does better than Nick Young is rack up assists. Foye=4.9 Assists per 40 minutes vs. Young’s 2.1 Asists per 40 minutes…. But Randy Foye played Point Guard for Minnesota last year too….
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foye vs Young
And 4.9 Assists per 40 minutes for a PG is poor…
In addition, I saw real progress with Young’s defense at the end of last year. He has the tools (height, 7’0" wingspan, hops, quickness) to be a good defender. Foye, playing as a Shooting Guard is undersized
Let’s also remember that Foye puts up 18.3 ppg (per 40 minutes) after playing more than 5,600 minutes through 3 seasons….. Young is averaging 19.4 ppg (per 40 minutes) after playing less than 3,000 minutes through 2 seasons.
In my opinion, Young has the higher upside than Foye.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Jun 24, 2009 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Randy Foye played Point Guard for Minnesota last year too….
Not this past year.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 25, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that about sums it up
the problem is, we really needed a home run this offseason. Since the last time we were in the playoffs, Orlando, Atlanta, Chicago, and maybe even Philly has leapfrogged us. Maybe Detroit drops off to soften it up a little, but Cleveland and Boston are still better. Plus Miami and even Charlotte will be better. We just better hope Ernie has something bigger up his sleeve.
by CJHutch on Jun 24, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














