Getting called into the Principal's office.
First, I want to say that I'm not at practices. I don't attend any meetings. I'm not around the team constantly. I watch the games on TV. I read the paper. I read blogs. So, maybe I've got a skewed perception on what's really going on inside the Wizards locker room - but from the outside looking in, it doesn't look pretty.
I wasn't going to say anything negative about the blow out loss to the Spurs. Games like that happen. The Wizards couldn't seem to find the basket, and shot as poorly as I've seen them shoot all year. In addition, they forgot to play defense on the Spurs shooters (Mason, Finley, etc...) and got burned time after time when they left 3-point shooters wide open (my pet peeve). Nope, I was going to give them a pass on this one. San Antonio has been playing extremely well. They have one of the most efficient Offenses in the League. Their shooters were hot. The Wizards have been playing better after the All-Star break, but just had one of those off shooting nights. The effort was there. I question the Wizard's 3-point defensive scheme - but I cannot question the effort. Chalk it up as a loss to a better team.
Then I read this quote:
It took Ed Tapscott about 15 minutes to come out and address the media. After speaking to the team he had Nick Young, Javaris Crittenton, JaVale McGee and Oleksiy Pecherov in his office, "getting in somebody's butt hole," according to Antawn Jamison.
I sure hope that quote was wrong. I hope that Tapscott wasn't reaming out those young guys for a poor performance against the Spurs. I hope that Tapscott is not so stupid as to think that there's ANYTHING those four players could have done in the meager time he allotted them in the first three quarters to affect the outcome of that game.
When the game was already out of reach (23 point lead by the Spurs), Tapscott made wholesale substitutions at the 8:05 mark of the fourth quarter and put in JaVale McGee, Young and Crittenton. Pecherov came in with 5:34 left in the game. Up until that point, Nick Young played a total of 3:45; McGee played a total of 4:53; and Pecherov had not played at all. Just to make sure I didn't miss anything, I went back to watch that final 8:05 of the fourth quarter. The youngsters didn't play particularly well. Sorry, I take that back - they didn't SHOOT particularly well; but then neither did Antawn Jamison or Andray Blatche when they were in the game earlier. But the young guys did show effort. They did try to close out on shooters. The Spurs only made two 3-point shots (after making 11 up to that point) and one of those was contested. The young Wizards didn't seem particularly organized on offense and turned the ball over twice - but they didn't look any more inept than Mike James or Juan Dixon had earlier in the game. I did not see anything in that 4th quarter that made me think: "Wow, those young players are really stinking up the joint"
I am very concerned about an apparent rift within the organization, and specifically a rift that appears to have been created by Tapscott and Jamison between the "youngsters" and the "veterans".
Veterans like Mike James, can apparently do no wrong, even when they play over 26 minutes, go 0-6, and allow their defensive assignment to go off for 25 points - including 5 WIDE OPEN 3-point shots.But if Javaris Crittenton makes a mistake and lingers on the baseline too long and allows his man to score on a fast break, Taps is immediately in his grill.
Veterans like Jamison can play 36 minutes, and chuck the ball up every time they touch it regardless if they're only shooting 6-17 from the field; but Nick Young gets yanked if he misses two shots in a row.
A veteran like Caron Butler can play 33 minutes, cheat the passing lanes so he can grab Sports Center highlight steals, and leave 3-point shooters like Michael Finley WIDE OPEN NINE TIMES; but McGee goes for a pump fake he gets yanked.
A veteran like Darius Songaila can play 27 minutes and secure exactly 2 whole rebounds. Pecherov gets 2 rebounds in 5 minutes but fails to box out once, he sits the bench for a week.
The "veterans" can stink up the joint, but if the "youngsters" don't play well, they get called into the Principal's office. And what did Pecherov do to get thrown in with the rest? Next time Tapscott looks at the end of the bench, Pech is gonna say "no thanks Coach, it's safer here on the end of the bench - I don't want to get yelled at again."
The development of Nick Young is of particular concern for me. Of all the recent Wizard's draft picks, Nick had, in my opinion, the highest ceiling. When he got here, I seriously thought he could be an All-Star quality Shooting Guard. Now I think his development has been so retarded by the inconsistent playing time he's getting - that his development may have actually halted - and he may have already hit his ceiling.
Nick will start to get into a groove, his minutes will increase to 25-30 minutes per game. He starts to produce numbers, then he'll have an off game - and his minutes are immediately dropped to 11-15 minutes a game for a week or so. This is not a new development. It's a regular pattern. The same thing has happened all year long.
Earlier this month, I thought the Coaching staff had finally figured it out. The first 5 games this month, Nick was getting 25-30 minutes a night and averaging 17 points per game. Then he had a poor shooting night against Charlotte, and his minutes dropped in the next three games to 15, 11 and 12 minutes yesterday. And it's not just that the minutes have dropped; but also WHEN he's playing. The last three games, he's played very little in the first halves of games. In other words, he's getting mop up duty.
More Examples:
Jan 7th - Jan 19th. Nick averaged almost 30 minutes per game, and he was scoring almost 21 points per game. He had a bad shooting night against Golden State on Jan 19th, and for the next 6 games he averaged only 14 minutes per game.
Nov 22 - Dec 5th. Young averaged 21 minutes per game, and he averaged about 11 points per game. Then he shot 1-6 against Chicago on December 6th, and his minutes dropped to 13 per game for the next 6 games.
This is coaching?
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I love the statistics at the end
show’s how fucked up this whole thing is. I don’t believe punishing rookies is the way to develop them. They know when they have a poor night and it’s not like you’re rewarding them when you give them an equal number of minutes the next game.
rockin' the crab dribble since 2009
You and I are singing from the same song book on this one
And this is one of the reasons I wanted Jamison gone. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least to find that Jamison was encouraging Tapscott to do this kind of thing. I don’t see Butler as the type to do that. Maybe Tapscott would pull this crap anyway, I don’t know, but it makes me angry and makes it harder for me to watch this team.
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Feb 23, 2009 1:05 AM EST reply actions
concerned
as head of player development, you’d think that tapscott would be more aware of the repurcussions of the way in which he’s ‘coddling’ the youth of the Wiz. Perhaps he and grun are planning to package up all our talent to get some veterans in their golden twilight so we can eat their bloated contracts and nagging injuries…
i wouldn’t mind a guy like Antonio McDyess, but I think an all star level performing McDyess won’t bring as much money (attendance / merchandise sales) as a Nick Young / McGee combination coming off the bench getting meaningful minutes, and making a case for the sportscenter top 10 each night.
and if juwan howard comes back to this team, i’m swearing off the wiz….
Great, now my Monday is ruined.
This isn’t quite Huck Smash territory, but it’s close. I don’t want Ed Tapscott within 50 feet of coaching this team next year, especially if they keep the high draft pick.
Someone call Child Protective Services! These boys' feelings were hurt!
Seriously, who cares. Getting chewed out is part of professional sports and especially when you’re young.
The issue of who deserved to get criticized the most is a complete red herring. I want my coach to spend more time pointing out what the young players did wrong than the older players. The older players are going to do what they do, for better or worse. The young players have a chance to learn from their mistakes. I don’t think there’s any chance of these players being so emotionally scarred from Ed Tapscott that their development will be slowed, or even halted.
The problem of dividing up the minutes is a completely separate problem.
Rook, this post....
Should be printed and hand-delivered to Tapscott. This game was lost by the vets, not the kids. But the kids get blasted, and the vets get a free ride losing game after losing game after losing game. I used to love Antawn; now it’s getting to the point that I can’t stand him. All he can do is point the finger at other people. He’s not nearly the classy vet I thought.
but...
This game was lost by the vets, not the kids. But the kids get blasted, and the vets get a free ride losing game after losing game after losing game.
We really don’t know that this is true based on one statement made by the Washington Times. Even Jamison may have said what he said because the whole team just got chewed out in the locker room after the game (something that the media wouldn’t have seen).
Why should we assume both Tapscott and Jamison are blaming the young guys? What was reported in the Times tells us very, very little. It tells us practically nothing, except that a handful of young guys were yelled at by the coach. But that’s not enough to make sweeping generalizations.
by Johnnie Futbol on Feb 23, 2009 1:08 PM EST up reply actions
This isn't...
The first time these types of comments have been recorded. Far from it, in fact. Jamison and Taps have been dissing the young guys all season, as if they expect them to play like 5-year vets and are disappointed that they aren’t.
It's also...
Not the first time someone has overblown something printed in the paper. There’s absolutely nothing in that Washington Times report that suggests that Tapscott or Jamison was placing blame for the miserable loss on the young players. We can assume that the young guys were getting chewed out but what does that really prove? There’s a whole lot of context that doesn’t get explained in the Times article. We have no clue what Tapscott actually said to them, yet we make generalizations. We have no clue what Tapscott said to the entire team, yet we make generalizations. We have no clue whether Jamison actually believes it’s the young guys who let the team down (he only stated that Tapscott was “getting in somebody’s butt hole,” nothing more), yet we make generalizations.
I think you missed this part: “It took Ed Tapscott about 15 minutes to come out and address the media. After speaking to the team he had Nick Young, Javaris Crittenton, JaVale McGee and Oleksiy Pecherov in his office”
I’m with Johnnie on this one. We have no idea what went on.
by MR on Feb 23, 2009 5:31 PM EST up reply actions
It's the double standard that bothers us.
Be tough on your players, but be tough on all your players. If you’re going to call out the rookies for making mistakes, call out Mike James for not playing defense or call out Caron for not taking care of the basketball.
Tapscott seems like an insecure interim coach, kissing up to veterans and giving the young guys hell. His style obviously hasn’t worked wonders this year and doesn’t seem to be setting up the team for next year either.
by antawnjameson on Feb 23, 2009 6:47 PM EST up reply actions
Regardless...
…of what Tap was saying or doing to the young guys – you can’t argue with the fact that Nick Young hasn’t been getting consistent minutes. We ought to have Tap in OUR (the die-hard fans) office, so we can get into HIS butthole. He’s our 3rd most deadly scorer (he can take ANYONE off the dribble), and it’s not like Caron (or even Jamison for that matter) plays very consistently. We don’t see their minutes die off after a bad shooting night.
It’s ridiculous. We need to be helping Nick develop, because he could and should be our starting shooting guard next year. Think of all the development he had over the summer, into this year. He’ll keep getting better, and Tap isn’t helping.

by 


















