Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys: Unknown Quantities

Wizards lose to Pacers: Final wrap (quickly) and more bemoaning our lack of role players

Sitting up in the nosebleeds, where you can see the whole court, kind of gives you a new perspective on the team.  I figured the team's problem was that nobody did the little things and nobody had any attention to detail, but watching this game, that truth was just staggering.

So many missed defensive rotations.  So many dumb turnovers killing any positive momentum we created.  So many poor shots.  So many times where guys just don't run hard through their cuts.  So many weak screens, or times when people slip the screen unnecessarily because they want to get the pass and shoot.

Then, there was the end of the game.  Kyle beautifully broke down the staggering lack of detail on the final play of the game, one that cost them the win, but it was the possessions before as well.  When the Wizards should have been clamping down on defense to put the game away, they were allowing Earl Watson and Tyler Hansbrough to complete lob passes for dunks.  Simply unacceptable. 

I'm firmly convinced this is a roster construction problem.  Right now, everyone wants to be the guy who saves this team.  There are only two guys on the team who truly don't care what kind of role they play in the team's success -- Brendan Haywood and Mike Miller, who is injured because the Wizards decided to run him out when he was clearly injured instead of making sure he was okay.  Everyone else wants credit.  They won't say it, but they play like it.  On an NBA team, only so many people can be the shot-makers.  You need guys who have no egos to blend in with the ones who do. 

An addition-for-subtraction trade needs to happen pronto.  It could be anyone.  The ones who remain just need that wakeup call, that message that nobody is safe from getting dealt. 

Four Factors (Bold=very good | Italics=very bad)

Team Pace Off Eff eFG% FT/FG OREB% TOr
Indiana 96
118.8
47.8 31.1 34
14.6
Washington

117.7
59.8
18.3 34.2
17.7

 

Snap Reaction: It's nice that we shot well, but how the heck do you let Indiana get to the free-throw line that much?  Who do they have that can draw fouls?  Ridiculous.

Lineup Details, via Popcorn Machine

Snap Reaction: It's becoming clear that Nick Young is winning the Young/Randy Foye death match we all anticipated coming into the season (okay, just me).  So why does Young only play 14 minutes?  That's right, DeShawn Stevenson took the rest of the shooting guard minutes.  How Young doesn't have a regular rotation spot is beyond me.  Also, why doesn't Dominic McGuire get all of Stevenson's minutes?

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I agree with everything

Young should start at least while Miller is out. When Miller gets back, Young still deserves a place in the rotation.

The attention to detail is pathetic. We should have had Haywood, McGee, Blatche, DMac and Young in the game for that last defensive play. Young should have been on Ford, Blatche on the inbounder, and it doesn’t matter who guarded anyone else. They all have the size, length and/or hops to prevent a tip in.

A trade is necessary. Ideally, it should be one of the Big Three. Presumably, that means Butler because he has the most trade value and is arguably the worst fit in Flip’s system. Trade Butler for a cheaper, younger SF or a high pick. There’s no reason for Leonsis to pay a gargantuan luxtax bill for this squad.

If things don’t turn around quick, then it is also time to trade Jamison. Cleveland is the logical trade partner with Z’s expiring contract.

Arenas is playing much better on offense, but his defense remains laughably bad. I just don’t know how you get through to him. What’s it going to take to get him to defend consistently?

by nate33 on Dec 14, 2009 4:09 PM EST reply actions  

It’s definitely Butler, his contract is up soon and is easily our best trading chip. Dom or Miller when he gets back can take his minutes. Hopefully we’ll get a shutdown defender for him.

by Fundefined on Dec 14, 2009 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

reg arenas- bench him, thats how
foye will need min to build trade value if that is their intention. but i thought a post earlier suggested that might not be in the cards this season

by les boulez bomber on Dec 15, 2009 2:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Wizards' role players

Haywood: playing well this year
Stevenson: not the same since the back injury, especially shooting the ball
Oberto: foul-happy, and poor fit alongside Jamison defensively
McGuire: can’t shoot, few assists this year
Miller: injured
Crittenton: injured

With Miller and Crittenton out with injuries, the only role players that have been getting much playing time are Haywood and Stevenson. Is Stevenson really our second best healthy role player? Yes, Oberto and McGuire have been slumping lately, but Stevenson has been at least as bad. Flip needs to find more minutes for Oberto and/or McGuire to see if they can get into a rhythm.

by yop32 on Dec 14, 2009 4:58 PM EST reply actions  

Don't forget Dom

who, in all fairness, hasn’t played enough to have a role.

by Pryme on Dec 14, 2009 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Young/Randy Foye death match

I won’t say “I told you so” yet – because there’s a lot of season left…. but Foye is certainly looking like one of those “got a lot of minutes on a bad team and put up big numbers” guys to me…..

And I agree with nate33 – Young right now is the best option at SG until Miller comes back. Miller should get the starting role when he returns, but Young deserves ALL the remaining SG minutes behind Miller; as Randy Foye has not earned any time based on his play so far.

I’m not ready to blow up this team – trade Butler, trade Jamison and start over… For one thing, I’m not as young as the rest of you guys – I’m not sure I can wait around for 6 or 7 more years…..

Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......

by Rook6980 on Dec 14, 2009 4:59 PM EST reply actions  

I wish I had posted this during the offseason

but I always felt Foye was brought in to light a fire under NY. As in one way or another EG was going to finally figure out his SG conundrum this season. I am glad the answer is young sans that goofy haircut.

by ccrun1800 on Dec 14, 2009 6:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't really feel that Foye and NY are in direct competition with each other

2 different players with 2 different skill sets. I think Foye was brought in to add depth at PG and SG and basically be a poor mans Arenas if Gil got injured again. I think Foye/Boykins was the death match that Foye lost. Foye was playing alot better when he had the ball in his hands before he got injured. When he came back Boykins had a lock on the back up ballhandler spot and now Foye floats around the perimeter while Boykins pounds the rock into the floor. Foye should be playing with Arenas or Miller not Boykins.
As for NY he should be starting. His game was slipping so they put in Stevenson to motivate him to respond. I can understand Flips thinking “If YOUR not gonna play hard every night, I’ll put THAT guy in cuz he will put forth the effort”. I just think NY has progressed to far for that treatment. He has finally shown he can be a valuable guy on a decent team so give him the start and 25+ every night and let him prove or not prove he is a consistent guy every night. Even if he puts 2 bad games in a row together like he did before Indiana just let him have his minutes. Also if your gonna bring a guy in for hustle/punishment you might as well bring Dom in IMO.

by BayAreaBullet on Dec 14, 2009 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Kind of like 1991

When GM John Nash brought in LaBradford Smith to light a fire under Ledell Eackles! That one worked out well for both players.

by hotplate on Dec 14, 2009 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

lol…well, its been 30…where’s ur patience
ted should be a pretty good owner

by les boulez bomber on Dec 15, 2009 2:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Big Three plus two role players

We went to the second round of the playoffs with Brendan and Jared Jeffries as the two role players. Why not see if McGuire can fill the Jeffries role?

by yop32 on Dec 14, 2009 5:38 PM EST reply actions  

Not an apples and Oranges comparison

That team would barely have qualified for the playoffs in this years Eastern Conference.

by BayAreaBullet on Dec 14, 2009 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

They'd be better than 7-15

They’d be playing better, more in-sync basketball. And nobody would be getting their heads twisted into knots. How much more of this can Gilbert and Caron take before they become complete headcases?

by yop32 on Dec 15, 2009 10:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Here's a twist

It seems to me that the veterans are setting a bad example for the younger players on the team. For one thing, the vets have a losing attitude. Secondly, they are soft and refuse to set hard picks and play defense. Third, they are unprepared (see closing seconds of Indiana game).

Regarding Foye versus Young, neither has played that much or been given an extended vote of confidence by the coach. Nevertheless, once one recognizes that the Big 3 are now near average NBA players, we need someone much better than Young or Foye to run the point. We need to building for the future with Blatche and McGee and a premiere point guard.

by Izman on Dec 14, 2009 6:53 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Randy Wittman Seems to "Get It"

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In-Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Associate Editor

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz

Photo_on_2010-12-10_at_10 Bullet Nation in Exile