Wizards lose to Cavaliers: Final wrap and a word about our half-court offense
Last night, in our emotional game recap, I mentioned that last night's game proved that we're still not there when it comes to the true contenders for the title. It was a bit of a snappy line that was put there in effect, in part because it sounded right and in part because there was something more to it that I needed time to think about.
Well, now I've thought about it and I realize what I meant.
The sign of a true contender is one who can run their half-court offense effectively in the face of stepped-up defensive pressure. A true contender trusts their offensive system and offensive sets enough to run them better when the defensive pressure increases rather than abandoning them. The Wizards didn't run their halfcourt offense well last night. Therefore, they aren't there yet.
More below the jump, but first, some numbers.
Four Factors: (bold=very high, italics=very low).
| Team | Pace | Off Eff | eFG% | FT/FG | OREB% | TOr |
| Washington | 88 | 102.3 | 42% | 46.4 | 29.3% | 14.8 |
| Cleveland | 115.9 | 48.3% | 22.1 | 26.5% | 8 |
Lineup stats, via Popcorn Machine
- Highest individual plus/minus: JaVale McGee (+1 in 11:24)
- Lowest individual plus/minus: Mike Miller (-16 in 34:36) and Randy Foye (-14 in 19:30)
- Best lineup: Gilbert Arenas/Mike Miller/Caron Butler/Fabricio Oberto/Brendan Haywood (+6 to start the game)
- Worst lineup: Gilbert Arenas/Randy Foye/DeShawn Stevenson/Andray Blatche/Brendan Haywood (-9 in the fourth quarter)
Think about it for a second. When did the game turn? In the second quarter, when the Wizards started fouling too much on defense. What happens when you foul? The other team goes to the free throw line. What happens when the other team goes to the free throw line? You're constantly taking the ball out of the basket. What happens when you constantly take the ball out of the basket? You have no transition game to rely on to use your speed advantage. How do you win when you can't rely on your transition game? You need to execute your half-court offense well.
That didn't happen at all. Credit Cleveland's defense for a lot, of course. They basically decided to play Gilbert Arenas straight up and let him try to score, and it worked tremendously. But eventually, with the game slowed down and the Wizards frustrated by perceived bad calls, they stopped running the sets and instead broke plays to make mad dashes to the rim. They figured that the refs were calling the game tight and could take advantage by creating contact. That worked, in a sense, because the Wizards ended up with 41 free throws (which was 14 more than Cleveland despite referee mistreatment, for what it's worth). But all it did is slow the game down even further, which works to Cleveland's advantage.
It wasn't just Arenas either. Caron Butler, after an excellent offensive first quarter where he did a great job of running LeBron James off picks and tiring him out, didn't do the same in the third quarter. When he did get the ball in the second half, the offensive flow just stopped as we waited for Butler to size up his defender, jab step, then either shoot or drive. Those types of things hurt your offensive flow, even if the play is designed to get Butler isolated somewhere. Randy Foye slugged his way through 19 minutes and just one assist, while Brendan Haywood continues to look for his offense a bit too much for my taste.
The Wizards' halfcourt offense needs quick and decisive moves to work. It's all a bunch of cuts and screens that fold into each other. If you take too long on one play, then you hamper your chances of continuing the offense. Too often, there was a lot of sizing up the defense rather than just going and making a play right off the bat. That, along with driving just to draw fouls, slows down the pace of the game and only exacerbates Cleveland's size advantage.
The good news here is that, if this is the problem, the remedy may simply be more time in Flip Saunders' system. That'll occur naturally as the season goes on, as everyone gets more comfortable running those sets after so many years in the Princeton. Here's hoping that time can heal those wounds.
Other notes:
- Mike Miller took just three shots last night (although he did draw a number of fouls). Frankly, it's just mind-boggling how this happens. He does so many things that just make you wonder, like throwing the ball into JaVale McGee in the post with the shot clock running down. The Wizards really need to do something to force him to shoot instead of relying on him to find his offense. For example, why not let him come off the bench and start DeShawn Stevenson? Miller could come in for Caron Butler and immediately become the second- or third-best offensive player in the lineup. Then, run some plays for him and have him handle the ball in pick-and-roll situations.
- I was very disappointed that Foye, Arenas and Miller never shared the court last night. I guess Flip Saunders was concerned with how they'd match up defensively with LeBron James in that lineup, but LeBron only played 36 minutes. Why not play that lineup during that stretch? Cleveland has small guards anyway. Instead, either Butler or Stevenson was in the game at all times. I think that was a mistake. UPDATE: As Aldo points out, they did end the second quarter together and were outscored by six points. My bad. Of course, the Wizards were playing Caron Butler at PF, but the point still stands.
- It's only four games, but I'm a bit worried with how much Brendan Haywood is looking for his own shot. I talked to him after the Nets game about this, and he sounded so happy that he was shooting. He pointed out that he's taken 32 shots in three games (not including last night), and that it would have taken a month in the Princeton offense to get that many. This may be true, and I'm not opposed with the occasional post touch for Haywood, but Haywood is one of those guys whose efficiency goes down with increased usage. Since his efficiency was such a huge part of his value in the past, it's important his usage remains low. Don't force things, Brendan. Run the offense.
- Once again, Fabricio Oberto did some positive things, but it was amazing how little respect Cleveland showed for him. Anderson Varejao basically didn't guard him the halfcourt offense. This is where Antawn Jamison's return will help most. The spacing with Oberto on the floor is brutal.
- Andray Blatche didn't play badly, but he still needs to work on improving his play when he runs into a little adversity. He wasn't the same after he picked up those three fouls.
- A positive sign: JaVale McGee has put together four very good games. He hasn't played much, but he's doing several positive things out there. I like his aggression fighting for offensive boards.
And finally, a note to Cleveland fans...
I imagine if you check out our game thread, you'll be a bit put off by all the whining about the officials. I understand that -- you want to enjoy your win and you don't want to deal with comments that make us seem like sore losers. But please, consider a few things.
- Game threads are our sounding board. They're meant to be where we make our snap reactions to plays. They're meant to be places where our passion shows itself the most. Everyone on this site is a smart, rational fan that, like any other, is prone to emotional anxiety in the heat of the moment. So don't use those comments as fuel to your long-standing belief that Wizards fans are either stupid, crybabys or sore losers. Consider context first. Understand that those threads, and the immediate post-game threads that follow, are meant to be venting places when the Wizards lose. We do plenty of self-analysis, so don't say all we do is whine about the officials. To make an analogy - coaches complain to the officials during games all the time, but nobody would consider them whiners. It's just what happens in the heat of the moment. We understand that and we ask you do too.
- Please, please, please admit this is a rivalry and that you dislike the Wizards and their fans emotionally. I mean, your own local broadcast had a poll running that said "Which Wizards player do you hate the most?" We're willing to admit that our hatred for the Cavs affects us, please be willing to do the same. And please, the players on the Cavs don't like the Wizards either, as much as they may say otherwise. As long as you're willing to admit your biases, we're willing to talk to you, because we're all aware of ours. The second the tone turns into "You pathetic Wizards and your fans, you're not our rival, we don't care about you," is the second things go south. It's wrong and you all know it.
- You are welcome to comment on here, but please understand you're talking on someone else's turf. You may not agree with us or our rules, but you need to be respectful of the location. So don't come on here to pick fights. Don't call us whiners even if you believe we are. Be careful with how you phrase your comments because you know we're a sensitive lot. It's not the fairest way to talk in the world, but that's just how it is. You wouldn't go over to someone's house and tell them that their cooking sucks or their house isn't clean enough.
- Finally, it is possible for us to have intelligent, rational discussion as long as we set some ground rules.
Thanks. If you are here to comment rationally and follow those ground rules, we look forward to hearing from you.
0 recs |
37 comments
|
Comments
I COULDN'T AGREE MORE!
It wasn’t til I posted my “How to win a championship” post that I read this. Then I wondered why I even posted all that when you were able to say the same thing so much clearer. I think our defense is there this year if only we can execute on offense.
by Carlos Returns on Nov 4, 2009 3:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Inconsistent in part
1. The Wizards didn’t run their halfcourt offense well last night. Therefore, they aren’t there yet.
2. Worst lineup: Gilbert Arenas/Randy Foye/DeShawn Stevenson/Andray Blatche/Brendan Haywood
3. For example, why not let him come off the bench and start DeShawn Stevenson?
If you start DS with Oberto and Haywood, you will have no offense at all. You need three scorers at a minimum to keep the defense somewhat honest.
by Izman on Nov 4, 2009 3:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Miller really really really needs to shoot more
really
by MR on Nov 4, 2009 3:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Regarding the rivalry
In defense of Cleveland fans (myself included), the reason we are hesitant to label this a rivalry is 2-fold.
1. During the years we faced you guys in the playoffs, we faced the Pistons twice afterward. The Cavs and PIstons each won a series, and both went at least 6 games. So even though there was hate between the Wiz and Cavs, we always thought the Pistons were our chief rival. Then, after a few rough regular season games and hard fought series with the Celtics in 2007-08, the Celtics became our chief rivals. Fans put more weight into having one main rivalry, and the Wizards were never that to us.
2. Lets be honest. The series were not close. Yes, they were physical, exciting games – but Cavs are 12-4 against the Wiz in the playoffs. Thats just not competitive enough.
Having said that, I, along with most Cavs fans, would definitely agree with your other points. We do care a large deal about the games with the Wizards, and I’m sure there is a lot of hate towards the players (although personally I only hate Haywood and Stevenson – I am indifferent about the rest). Although you guys may not like to hear that we don’t hate you as much as you hate us, its the honest truth. Celtics/Magic are a lot higher on our hate list. Thats just the way rivalries work – just look at the Browns/Pittsburgh “rivalry.” Everyone in Cleveland still thinks its a rivalry, but no one in Pittsburgh even cares because we’ve lost something like 12 games in a row to them.
by neyvit on Nov 4, 2009 3:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
we don’t hate you as much as you hate us
I guess we’re just more lovable.
by MR on Nov 4, 2009 3:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The one point I'd disagree with
Is that the series were close. In 2006, the Wizards lost three games by one point. The point differential in that series was very even.
In 2008, the Cavs barely won Games 1 and 4. If the Wizards win game 4 and then also win game 5, it’s a very different series. Less competitive than 06, sure, but still pretty competitive.
07 wasn’t competitive because we were missing our two best players.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And also, the two teams have spit the regular-season games going back to 06, I believe
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
rivalry?!?
As a Cav fan, washington in my opinion is a game I pay attention to. At the same time washington is not there yet in terms of being a “rival” or being relevant in the east. the wizards have to win a series in the playoffs first. They haven’t done that in a while so until that happens they cannot be in the conversation for east contenders or even a rival for the cavs. the celtics, magic and maybe detroit. washington has to have mental toughness in meaningful games and they haven’t displayed that yet. the wizards have nice pieces and adding flip sauders is huge. But until they advance to 2nd round the cavs vs. wizards “rivalry” is not that big. However, the fact that these teams have beef is real.
by Reggie4000 on Nov 4, 2009 7:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Beating a dead horse here
2006? Traveling got your that pivotal game 3. Whole different series when we should have won that game. Another game at home, and we’re up 2-1.
2007? Not a series with our 2 best players not playing.
2008? Gil is still injured, but playing, and we still kept it competitive.
Regular season matchup? We actually have won MORE regular season wins than losses in the matchup.
I don’t care if you don’t call it a rivalry, but Lebron sure made it seem like one when he singled the irrelevant Wizards out in the 1st round of the playoffs after they had just won 19 games. Still thinks about us. He’s obsessed with us. Which is why he whined about his traveling crab dribble for two days, only to make himself look like a total idiot. I bet if it’s another team, he wouldn’t have whined as much.
My swag was phenomenal.
by se7en on Nov 4, 2009 11:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Foye, Arenas, and Miller played together at the end of the 2nd quarter
And they went -6.
by Aldo on Nov 4, 2009 3:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hmm...good catch
It was with a tiny lineup though.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 4:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
fixed the main post
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 4:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No offense but
if its not a rivalry, then why are you here? Did you post on the Bobcatsblog after the Cavs played Charlotte? If so, I apologize. But commentary in game threads from opposing fans is pretty rare other than when the Wizards play Cleveland.
And you’ve got to admit that part of the fun of winning a rivalry is to let the opponents know that they are so far beneath you that they are in fact, not a rival. Yes, its a paradox but bysaying “there’s no rivalry” you are in fact proving that there is a rivalry.
And we in Washington consider the score to be 8-4, not 12-4. The year with no Caron and no Gilbert doesn’t count to us. Yeah, its arbitrary, but we’re allowed to be when dealing with our bitter rivals.
by hotplate on Nov 4, 2009 4:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
neyvit didn't comment on the game thread
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, I visit opposing teams pretty often to see what their opinions of the games, matchups, predictions etc. Especially for big games like this one, Magic, Celtics, Pistons, Blazers – and only if I know of a good blog related to that team.
I think the disagreement between us is over semantics. When I think of a rivalry, I look at the one team that is the arch-nemesis of my favorite team as THE rivalry. Everything other than that main rivalry is sub-par. I guess a good term would be a lesser rivalry to describe the Wiz-Cavs. Its not that I’m not excited every time we meet, but I would by lying if I said it was as important to our fanbase as Celts-Cavs games (or even Lakers games because of the LBJ-Kobe storyline).
And yes, I do realize that you were shorthanded for 2 of the 3 series – which kind of helps my point. There was only 1 intensely competitive series between us, so the rivalry was downgraded because of the subsequent lopsided match-ups.
by neyvit on Nov 4, 2009 4:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
See, that definition of "rivalry" seems too results-oriented to me
I get it, but here’s something to consider – do you hate Boston or LA, or do you just want to beat them because that’s the hurdle Cleveland has to clear to be a title team? I suspect it’s the latter, in which case, you just ignore all the other elements that make something a rivalry. Do players on Boston hate players on Cleveland? I don’t see it nearly as much as with the Wizards.
Yeah, I get it … Washington has to clear the Cleveland hurdle too. But we don’t have a problem with Orlando or Boston, and you don’t have a problem with Atlanta, or example.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes. A rivalry is more than picking the best team that opposes you. It takes time to create. Even in down years the Redskins and Cowboys are deadly rivals for example.
by MR on Nov 4, 2009 5:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate the Celtics with a passion. There is absolutely nothing likable about any player on that team (except for Scalabrine). Ray Allen is the only one that is tolerable, although he did elbow Varejao in the balls. And I hate the Magic solely because of Stan Van Gundy (and Rafer Alston, but hes gone).
As for Lakers, you are right, I don’t have any strong feelings for them. I would put Wizards as a better rivalry than the Lakers for sure.
by neyvit on Nov 4, 2009 5:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But do the Celtics hate Cleveland back?
Does Orlando hate Cleveland back?
I’m sure not nearly as much as Cleveland hates the Wizards back.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 5:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It was interesting to hear Steve Buckhantz comment on Lebron last night saying that “No player in the NBA argues (bitches) more the Lebron”. We all know that but it was just interesting to hear it on the broadcast, and it was only in the 1st Quarter!
Its like as soon as a whistle blows LeBaby and Krusty the Klown put up there hands in protest, whether they know who the fould was called on or not.

by pas493 on Nov 4, 2009 4:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
buck HATES lebron
he calls him out for being 2-faced when he goes on the sports reporters. it sounds personal. he never goes too far, just leaves it at ’he’s not the same guy when the cameras are off’ – this is not meant as a compliment.
"a crab dribble is when you travel" - caron butler
by little stevie colter on Nov 4, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mike - how much of the Wizard's breakdown on Offense
can be attributed to the foul trouble?
After the 1st quarter, all the Wizard’s bigs had at least 3 fouls.
Can they be expected to set aggressive picks? No
Because the Bigs had to be careful, could Cleveland then turn up the heat on the Perimieter? Yes
Had the Wizards Centers and PF’s not been saddled with Foul Trouble, I think it would have been a different game.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on Nov 4, 2009 4:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Gotta set aggressive picks anyway and fight through it
Foul trouble can be an excuse for us, but it can’t be an excuse for them on the floor. You have to keep doing what you do and trust that it’ll work.
Cleveland’s guards also had a lot of fouls too, and that didn’t stop them from staying aggressive. Mo Williams had five all night. Delonte had three in 20 minutes.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 4:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but bigs
really hurt because they are setting the screens to pop guys free and fighting for position. Its pretty arbitrary when refs will call fouls. I’m glad Brendan fouled out he was going to play his game to the end (26mins).
by forthepeople on Nov 4, 2009 5:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt, foul trouble hurt us
I’m just saying you have to be able to overcome that. There will be games where you get in foul trouble.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 5:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im not worried
“The Wizards’ halfcourt offense needs quick and decisive moves to work.” the sounds an awful lot like what Twan brings to the big 3.
Nothing to worry about at this point. Miami game is a back to back but the team is coming home. That can often cure a teams offensive woes.
by forthepeople on Nov 4, 2009 4:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Trust in flip
In the two losses to atlanta and cleveland, washington has abandoned running the system after jumping out to big leads in the first quarter. They regress and start to play eddie jordan ball.
Trust in flip. Trust in the system.
by Knowledge92 on Nov 4, 2009 5:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think the Dallas game created a premature sense of confidence
It looked so easy. Best case scenario game, really. But opening with 3 tough road games out of 4 (Dallas, Atlanta and Cleveland are all very good) is a tough tough way to start.
I’m both encouraged by last nights game (they were deadly to start with) and worried that it was so easy to knock them out of their rhythm.
"a crab dribble is when you travel" - caron butler
by little stevie colter on Nov 4, 2009 5:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Washington will hit their stride in mid-season
10 of the first 15 games are against playoff teams and championship contenders. I don’t really expect anything over .500
But once players start buying into the system and roll through some cupcakes, they’ll gain some confidence and be a contender throughout till the end of the season.
by Knowledge92 on Nov 4, 2009 5:19 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
My takeaways from this game
- The Wizards are a work-in-progress — at the beginning of the learning curve, not the end.
- I LOVED how Caron Butler guarded LeBron all game. I’ve been critical of Butler not being the primary defender of LeBron in prior seasons. Loved that he got the assignment, really went after it, and even when Stevenson came in the game, Butler continued to guard LeBron. He got beat badly a few times, but this was (to my memory) the first time Butler guarded LeBron hard from start to finish.
- I agree with everyone’s comments about how the Wizards abandoned the offense. Not surprising given how new it is, but I primarily fault Arenas for that — as PG he should be trying to keep people organized, not leading the mutiny.
- Blatche’s passing is startlingly creative. It’s clear he has been given the freedom to make plays.
- I strongly disagree that Haywood is shooting too much. I agree that he has taken some bad shots, but everyone on this team does that, the Big 3 especially. Haywood is 6th on the team in shots per minute, which sounds just about right given his talent. He is second on the team in FTs attempted, and you want your bigs to pick up fouls on the other team (as Cleveland showed last night). His shooting percentage is low, and I agree he needs to learn what shots are going to be effective for him. I think your overall reaction, though, Mike, is in large part because Haywood is shooting so much more than in prior seasons. But that’s because Eddie’s offense underused him, not that he is being overused now.
by disgrunted on Nov 4, 2009 5:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Brendan's TS% is 47.7% right now
That’s just brutal. His usage rate is also a career high. My reaction has everything to do with that and little to do with him unexpectedly shooting more. I’d like to think I expected that.
Like I said, it’s early, so no major alarm bells yet, but it’s worth pointing out.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 5:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no idea what TS% is
but just by observation you can tell Haywood’s game has changed and I have to agree the direction it is headed in even though its early seems sour. Also what is that 15-18 ft jump shot he is shooting? That can’t be part of Flip’s offense.
Prada you do an awesome job moderating/running this board/blog. I was doing some snooping of some of the other SB nation blogs and we definitely have one of the best if not the best one around.
by ccrun1800 on Nov 4, 2009 6:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
bth don't shoot quite that much please
i agree with prada
by DarrellWalkerFan on Nov 4, 2009 6:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks so much for the site praise!
TS% is true shooting percentage, an advanced shooting stat that incorporates free throws. Scroll down on this page for a further explanation.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Nov 4, 2009 6:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















