I'm still doing some minor tweaking to the defensive FG component of the expanded box score, really just in how broadly to use "half" credits. The other big open item to me, though, is format of the box score itself. Is it better to put all of the offensive categories to one side, as I've done previously, or would it be better to pair up the counterpart stats (e.g., FG/3pt next to DFG/D3pt, turnovers next to turnovers forced, etc.)? I think pairing them off might make it easier to eyeball a player's net contribution in that phase of the game.
Votes and comments are welcome.
Which way do you think the Expanded (Four Factors) Box Score would work better? What would you rather see?
All of the offense on the left; all of the defense on the right (19 votes)
Pair off the opposite categories (e.g., turnovers committed next to turnovers forced) (10 votes)
29 total votes