Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

14 players in a new system: Mike Miller

Also see: An introduction to the series | Mike JamesJavaris Crittenton | DeShawn Stevenson | Fabricio Oberto | Nick Young | JaVale McGee | Dominic McGuire | Andray Blatche (cheating a little) | Randy Foye

We all know Mike Miller is going to play this year.  He's proven this preseason that he's an efficient, if reluctant (at times) scorer, an excellent rebounder for a guard and a very underrated passer. 

However, it's still up in the air as to how exactly Miller will be used.  Miller's a paradox of sorts.  On the one hand, with his shooting and versatile offensive game, he could pretty much fit in with any combination.  If he were to play a ton of minutes with the starting lineup, for example, he would make everyone's job easier because he can shoot the ball so well.  As he's talked about so many times in interviews this preseason, with him on the floor, defenders are going to have to choose whether they double off him and make him shoot or stick to him, which would give the other Big 3 players more time to go one-on-one.  That split second of indecisiveness could be all this offense needs to click.

On the other hand, we've also seen Miller display an annoying passivity for stretches because he's trying too hard to fit in.  This was a problem in Minnesota, where he suddenly stopped shooting in an attempt to play like Magic Johnson, and we've seen it here too, particularly when he has been paired with the starting lineup.  While he has a game that screams "complimentary player," he also has enough skills where he should be put in a position to make more plays.  That would mean playing a lot of times with the second unit, because Miller will have to tap into those facilitative skills in order to get the team to perform. 

It's a dilemma, that's for sure.  We also haven't even talked about his defense, which isn't so awful that it kills a team, but also isn't good enough to help a team when paired with other poor defenders.  So where do you play Miller most?  Make the jump to discuss.

Star-divide

Why he should start: Because nobody else has really separated themselves from the pack, and Miller is clearly the best player that's competing for the position.  Often times, simple is best.  Start your five best guys, and you won't have to worry about all the mind games and extra strategy that comes with saving one of your top five for the bench.  Miller's game also can help the Big 3, as mentioned earlier.

Why he should come off the bench, but play starters' minutes: Miller's defense is pretty poor, and defense is the type of thing where you need to set the tone at the beginning of the game.  Miller's facilitative skills can also help Randy Foye, who seems to play best when he isn't the only one making plays for people. 

My best guess: I see the latter situation happening for Miller.  He'll play starters minutes and he'll finish most games, but I don't see him starting for two reasons.  One is the defense factor -- Miller isn't good at it, and this team will need to play it better from the start of games.  The second reason is to best prevent the "passive Miller" from showing up.  If he's placed in the game and told to make plays, it'll keep him more in the flow for when he has to come in and play in the fourth quarter with the starters.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

lineup

Agree with all of this. More “quality shots” and less “play the right way,” please. (Can you imagine what would have happened if Larry Brown had every gotten hold of him?)

Some more discussion of lineups/minutes got started in the last Sixers-game post, and this one raises more issues. The “setting the tone with defense” idea is interesting. I know the Butler-as-SG thing is supposed to be dead, but I wonder what would happen if a lineup of Arenas/Butler/Jamison/Oberto/Haywood was used, with Miller playing as the “6th starter,” coming in for Oberto relatively early, then staying on the floor when other subs come in. (Yes, I’ve probably been drinking too much Fab kool-aid recently, but I wanted to try thinking of a different approach on the no-one-stepping-up at SG issue.)

by bwoodsxyz on Oct 22, 2009 12:02 PM EDT reply actions  

lineup of Arenas/Butler/Jamison/Oberto/Haywood was used, with Miller playing as the "6th starter," coming in for Oberto relatively early, then staying on the floor when other subs come in.

I don’t see the benefit of adding another player to the SG mix (Butler) when we are extremely deep at that position already. And I don’t think no one is stepping up at SG. I think they are all playing well…they are all stepping up, which makes the decision difficult.

I’m with Prada on his “best guess” scenario, even though I love Miller.

by MR on Oct 22, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Caron struggles offensively and defensively as a SG

I’m not sure if that would actually help the Defense. We’d have to see it I guess.

by BayAreaBullet on Oct 22, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

No thanks.

We don’t know how Jamison would transition to the 3, we know Caron doesn’t play all that well at the 2 and starting Oberto only hurts our depth by removing a backup 4/5 and pushing out either Foye, Miller, NY, or Stevenson from the rotation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk

by hibachi on Oct 22, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Miller's Defense

I haven’t seen a LOT of Miller, only a few Grizzlies games here and there, plus those televised preseason games, but I was actually impressed with Miller’s defense. I imagined him to be much worse than he is, but he knows the fundamentals real well, especially moving his feet to keep in front of his man, despite being slower than his guy. Relative to the other guys on this team, I think he’s actually a pretty good defender. Caron could be good, but I still see him making crucial errors, especially overplaying the passing lanes. So, I disagree that his defense is “pretty poor,” and relative to the rest of the team, it’s actually pretty decent. But I haven’t seen enough games of Miller to be an expert on it.

My swag was phenomenal.

by se7en on Oct 22, 2009 3:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Don't blame the photographer

It’s not his fault that Mike Miller looks like a subject on one of those “To Catch a Predator” NBC specials.

"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck

by George Templeton on Oct 22, 2009 5:21 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

But they all do. All of the team’s individual photos have looked like mugshots. It’s like they told each player that his dog was dead right before they took the picture.

by MR on Oct 22, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Louis Wiliams or Mike Miller in fantasy?

by Kevvvvv on Oct 22, 2009 5:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Randy Wittman Seems to "Get It"

Recent FanPosts

Kg_nasty_small
If the wiz get the #1 pick would you consider trading down?
Unseld_small
Playing Apologist to my Buddy in Orlando
Picture_015_small
Simply... Thomas Robinson is a beast!!!
Small
Donning the Grunfeld Moustache
Kg_nasty_small
would you redo the first round 2011 picks
History_summary_unseld_small
There is a solid team on this roster - if they get the minutes
Small
What makes a good basketball coach?
Small
Why resign a guy that still doesn't know how to box out or defend?
Small
realistic playoff chance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor in Chief

Headshot_small Mike Prada

Columnists

Small Vanilla Gorilla

248225_small Sean Fagan

Mriggs_cartoon_2__small Rook6980

Photo_on_2010-12-10_at_10 Bullet Nation in Exile

Contributors

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre

Addingmachine_small bwoodsxyz