Will Ernie Blow This Team Up?
Right now, the Wizards are tied for the fewest wins in the NBA. What better time is there to post my wild speculations? I'll continue.
Prada's SacTown game thread post has got me thinking, particularly this paragraph:
I'm beginning to believe Ernie Grunfeld is behind all of this. If so, he needs to be fired immediately. I don't care about all the good things he's done for us in the past; he's now screwing with our future. If we continue on this path, we've not only lost the season, we've lost the next six years. In case you all don't remember, we don't exactly have a ton of cap flexibility to do much to improve the team in free agency. Improvement mostly needs to come from within, and that means fostering improvement in those that can actually improve, not placading the egos of the veterans so the organization can give off the appearance that an 8-32 team is "not giving up." We're not stupid.
No, we are not stupid, but perhaps we are making some false assumptions. What if the young guys we are all clamoring for more playing time for aren't really the future of this team? What if they've become chips in an already worked out trade or trades that will be announced right before the trade deadline? Could it be that Ernie is dictating to Tap to play the young guys conservatively, rather than expose them to an increased chance of injury?
Think about it. As has been said before, this team as currently constructed was built to play the Princeton offense for Eddie Jordan. Almost all of our forwards are tweeners, and almost all of our guards are combos. When Ernie made the decision to fire Eddie Jordan, he had to notice this. Perhaps his firing of Jordan was the first step towards completely remaking this team. Unfortunately, that is difficult to do very quickly when you are 11 games into a season, especially when you want to hide your intentions.
I'm beginning to think that the whole "we are not going to sacrifice this season" mantra coming from Ernie is nothing more than blowing smoke. Ernie has always appeared to me like a very wise and patient poker player, keeping his cards close and continually folding until he sees the hand he likes. He may be putting on his poker face when he insists on playing to win this season. By playing to win, what he really might mean is playing so that his trading chips don't get hurt.
JaVale McGee clearly deserves to play more minutes, but isn't. The only logical explanation for this is my theory - JaVale is sweetener in a deal at the trade deadline. I'd hate to see us lose his potential, but I'll withhold my judgment until I see what Ernie can get back. My guess is that he needs to be included in order for a team to take on Etan, whose value at this point is nothing more than an expiring contract.
Javaris Crittenton could go either way at this point. On one hand, it appears that Ernie really likes him, and he is part of the future. Why then is he receiving so few minutes on a terrible team? Maybe Ernie has simply let on that he really likes him to hide something - like maybe some other GM really likes him. I can see him being dealt with JaVale and Etan. That would explain why he's not seeing more action and is still behind Mike James on the depth chart.
Mike James is also a mystery. On one hand, his big expiring contract shouldn't be that hard to deal, but on the other, he is logging a lot of minutes. Perhaps Ernie would rather showcase him instead of shielding him from injury. Since coming here, he has been playing at a level he hasn't played at in years. Even though his TS% still sucks, it's at least the best it has been since 2006-07 for Minnesota. My guess is that Ernie is trying to get more for him in a package but needs James to continue reviving his numbers from NBA seasons past before another GM will bite on Ernie's proposed deal.
I also have an added theory to go along with this - you trade youth because of potential and veterans because of performance. That would further explain James's minutes and may also explain Jamison's and/or Butler's. Any of those three could be packaged, though I doubt all will.
DeShawn could also go either way. The decision was made not long after the Crittenton trade to bench him, and not long after that for him to shut it down. Either Ernie wants him to get healthy for a trade (contridicting my theory in the paragraph above) or to start off healthy for next season, I'm not sure.
Blatche and Young are averaging over 20 mpg, and McGuire has been starting and averaging over 20 mpg since not long after the Crittenton trade, so my guess is all three are part of the future here. That is why they are getting a lot of experience playing. I also think that the only reason Ernie hasn't had Tap start Young is because Ernie wants to showcase James and get McGuire more experience. Young still averages 21.9 mpg.
One thing is for sure, Ernie must do something to accomadate for the luxury tax next season. Based on the weird rotations I'm seeing from Tapscott, I'm beginning to expect something big.
Either that or this franchise is truly incompetent. Like everything else in my post, it could go either way.
This represents the view of the user who wrote the FanPost, and not the entire Bullets Forever community. We're a place of many opinions, not just one.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yeah.
I’m actually wondering if Ernie isn’t “hiding” JaVale by having him play fewer minutes. I’m holding off judgement on Ernie until after the trading deadline. If we don’t make any moves and we keep up our current trends, then I’ll be pissed.
The Washington Wizards: providing career scoring nights for unknown opposing bench players since 2004.
Well if that's the case . . .
watching the Wizards is going to be difficult. I would rather watch the young players play and if they played well, wouldn’t teams be more interested anyway.
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jan 22, 2009 1:38 PM EST reply actions
Weighed Risk
I’m guessing that Ernie has already sold a GM on the young players’ potential, and he only needs to keep them from getting injured before the trade deadline.
I agree that it will be difficult to watch until the trade deadline. I suppose we could all be rooting for Mike James to do well so that his value will go up.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
Not my post but it's still interesting. Even Hollinger doesn't have a clue.
Darius Songalia: Come on, you don’t want to see Bynum dunk on me while Blatche and McGee sit on the bench?
John Hollinger: (4:21 PM ET ) Thanks for bringing that up … I am as puzzled as you are why McGee isn’t playing more, he looks like a stud in the making.
rockin' the crab dribble since 2009
yeah i saw that today and thought
maybe it’s the opposite – maybe he’s hiding young players a little so they are secret weapons next year when everyone’s back.
then i thought, well, that doesn’t really make sense – but in all respect, i don’t think any of the scenarios mentioned here make sense to me. not at all clear what grunfeld is doing. but the distribution of playing time is so weird that i agree with the idea that SOMETHING is up behind the scenes.
"a crab dribble is when you travel" - caron butler
by little stevie colter on Jan 22, 2009 9:08 PM EST up reply actions
Same
Are the Wizards showcasing their “veterans” (Songaila, Mike James, Thomas, Stevenson, etc…) for potential trades?
Are they hiding their young talent on the bench from other GM’s?
I brought up these same questions a few weeks ago on Wizards Insider – and was smacked down; but I didn’t make my case quite so eloquently as you did cuppettcj..
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
Here May Be Why
Thomas = big expiring contract; no other value whatsoever, but still something
Stevenson = very competent spot-up shooter and above-average defender when healthy; having him shut it down due to lower back pain reinforces the perception that his drop-off this season was solely due to injury; still may have some good reputation based on huge games last season
James = big expiring contract like with Etan; also can provide good defense and the ability to create open looks for others; scoring and shooting his best since 2006-07
Throw in a potential stud in JaVale McGee and a few other pieces of young talent like Crittenton and Pecherov, and a package with one of the three names mentioned above looks a whole lot more appealing to another GM. Think about it, if you are building for the future, why not take McGee packaged with either James or Etan? In two more seasons, McGee may be putting up monster numbers while Etan or James is off of your salary books.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
It's definitely confusing
For most of the season, I’ve held fast to the belief that Ernie wouldn’t blow it up because he just invested so much in the summer to keep the team together that it wouldn’t make sense to give up on it so early with two of your main cogs out. But the more I think about it, I wouldn’t be shocked to see a shakeup.
Odds are, the next coach won’t be teaching the Princeton offense (since there aren’t a lot of coaches out there that teach the system) so if there aren’t some changes then the new coach is going to have a roster with guys that probably won’t fit in with his coaching style. Take a guy like Songaila for instance, he’s a good fit in a Princeton offense because he’s good in the high post with his outside shot and he’s a good passer. But if the next coach wants to put forward a system that keeps the bigs down low most of the time, then he’s not as valuable to the team. So there’s the chance that he could be de-Princetonizing the team so the next coach can start with a clean slate.
I also wouldn’t be shocked if there was some showcasing going on, or maybe as Truth speculated EG wants to keep the young guys like Young and Crittenton in the roles that they would take if everyone was healthy to prepare them for next season. I’m not saying that it’s necessarily a good idea, but it could be what’s at work here.
Bullets Forever: A blog dedicated to the Washington Wizards with analysis, commentary, and more YouTube videos than your eyes can handle.
Grunfeld with the Bucks
Had the big 3 – I think is was Allen, Robinson and Baker – they had a decent run, but he blew it up after realizing they could only go so far. Then not long after he was gone.
Similar situation, no?
(Feel free to correct me if the names/timing seems off)
"a crab dribble is when you travel" - caron butler
by little stevie colter on Jan 22, 2009 9:03 PM EST reply actions
I liked this post but
I think you may be giving EG too much credit. I hope it’s true though; I’d hate to see McGee losing minutes for no reason.
EG's Track Record and Experience...
… tell me that he’s not stupid and has never been that bad of a GM. I have to believe that something is up his sleeve to account for the “mind-boggling” (as Prada put it) player rotations we have been seeing lately. Whether or not that “something” works well will probably decide whether or not Ernie keeps his job. One thing I do know about Ernie is that he is not afraid to take chances.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier



















