Lessons from tracking JaVale McGee's defense: It's not good
When I first saw the stat sheet from yesterday's Summer League game, the most ridiculous stat I saw was that JaVale McGee, our first-round pick who was praised as being a legitimate big man on draft day, had zero defensive rebounds. I knew he was not much of a rebounder in college, but that's pathetic.
So I decided to tape the rebroadcast of yesterday's game for one purpose. Track what JaVale McGee was doing defensively to have not grabbed a single rebound.
To be fair, the purpose of taping the game was broader than that. I was curious about McGee's inability to rebound, but I was also curious about his entire defensive game. Is he closer to the first-team all WAC defender that he was, or is he really "light years away" from being a NBA-level defender? From the first viewing, it seemed like his length was bothering people even if he looked silly on pump fakes a few times.
But I wasn't really watching McGee closely, so I decided to take note of everything McGee did on every single defensive possession. I'm not going to post everything, since tons of the possessions were pretty inconsequential, but here are some of his most important defensive sequences. Pretty soon, the conclusion will become obvious.
First Quarter
9:20 - It's Portland's first possession, and there have already been an offensive rebound because Andray Blatche decided he didn't want to box out. Jerryd Bayless eventually gets the ball and drives past Nick Young. McGee should be cutting him off, but instead, he stays where he is, hoping his wingspan will allow him to block the shot. Bayless floats up a shot, McGee swats at it and misses, and the shot goes in.
4:20 - The Wizards get caught in transition, and McGee is forced to guard Nicholas Batum. He forces Batum into a tough jumper that misses, but McGee doesn't even bother to contest it. Worse yet, he starts running up the floor instead of going for the rebound, and Batum gets it back. Batum drives on McGee, and McGee, instead of moving his feet, reaches in and pokes it away. Batum gets it back, but McGee goes into the paint. Bayless gets the ball and makes a sharp move down the middle. He's heading right for McGee going full-speed. McGee should take the charge, but instead, he throws his arms in front of him and doesn't really do anything. Bayless jumps through him, scores, and McGee is called for the foul.
Second Quarter
5:28 - This isn't completely McGee's fault, but he is partially to blame. Bayless takes the ball and drives past the entire defense coast-to-coast. The last guy who can stop him is McGee. A good defender would cut him off and draw a charge or force Bayless to move back. McGee doesn't do that. He hangs back, trying to time it for the block. Bayless, though, is too quick. He accelerates down the lane and flips up the lefty layup before McGee can swat at the ball. McGee misses the block and Bayless scores easily.
3:55 - Bayless and Ellis run a high pick and roll, and Bayless spins back left to find a drive to the lane. Dee Brown looks like he cuts him off, but McGee is behind Ellis on the right side. Bayless pump fakes and draws a foul, but that's not the significant part. McGee looks like he wants to challenge the shot, but Ellis is screening him out of the play right in front of Bayless. McGee likely would have had another block, but he allowed himself to be screened.
Third Quarter
8:02 - Up until the fourth quarter, McGee's pick and roll coverage was a mixed bag, but there were a few plays where he sagged back enough to use his length to recover when the guard shot the jumper. Here, however, is an example of him sagging too far. Petteri Koponen comes off an Alexis Maric (sp?) screen and hits a wide-open shot as McGee stands in the middle of the paint with his knees completely straight.
7:30 - Koponen sets a vicious cross-screen on McGee, and he can't recover in time. He goes for the steal on Maric, but misses it. Maric hits a bank shot, but somehow McGee hustles back and leaps high enough to literally take the ball off the cylinder for a goaltend. Just goes to show you how high he can jump.
Fourth Quarter
9:38 - J.R. Pinnock gets by Nick Young, and McGee needs to cut off the lane. Instead, he moves sideways so he's right underneath the rim. He leaps away from Pinnock, but because we're talking about J.R. Pinnock, he still got a hand on the ball and slapped it out of bounds. He's hitting down, though, instead of putting his arms up.
8:13 - Koponen darts past Brown, and again, McGee stays underneath trying to block the shot. Koponen floats it over his outstretched arm. On first view, it's a phenomenal shot, but it never would have happened if McGee stepped up.
7:06- Same as above, except with Pinnock.
6:38 - Maric catches and throws a half-hearted pump fake that McGee does for. McGee recovers, but fouls Maric. Terrible discipline.
3:52 - Maric backs in and misses a jump hook long. McGee is in good position to challenge, but for some strange reason, he jumps to block the shot. As he's in the air, the ball comes out and a Portland player is able to tap it back it out.
Maric and Koponen run a pick and roll, and McGee sags back, leaving the entire lane open. Koponen flips it up, McGee jumps, but this time Koponen misses. Once again, because McGee jumped, Portland taps the rebound back out.
Koponen eventually hits the game-tying three. All this in one possession.
1:52 - Maric backs McGee in easily and flips up a lefty hook. It misses, but again, McGee jumps to block it when simply raising his arms will do. Portland taps out the rebound. Later, Bayless goes down the lane and McGee is very late rotating. He eventually fouls Bayless.
24.3 seconds - We all know this one. Portland up three. McGee has the rebound, but jumps too early and loses it out of bounds.
5.8 seconds - Bayless misses the second free throw with Portland up three. Maric pushes McGee completely underneath the hoop to get the offensive rebound.
----------------------------------------
In short, not good. I counted 12 times when McGee should have cut off the lane, but instead tried for the spectacular block. I counted zero times when McGee really cut off the lane (I'm not talking about him failing to step up on a pick and roll), and only twice when he cut off the baseline.
But there's more. He twice jumped to block hook shots when he didn't need to do so, allowing Portland to grab offensive rebounds that he should have corralled himself. I counted three times when he failed to hedge and committed a foul on a pick and roll. He was killed on pump fakes twice more, committing fouls on both those possessions. He caught caught on a cross-screen once and committed a goaltend. He was shielded out of the play three times, if you count the last possession where Maric shoved him out of the way. There were also three possessions where he didn't get back on Portland's fast break.
That's 26 possessions right there where McGee completely messed up. I counted 52 possessions that occurred when McGee was in the game, so essentially McGee displayed awful defense that killed the Wizards on half of his defensive possessions! That doesn't even include the many possessions where McGee didn't really make much of an impact. You could count the number of possessions where McGee played solid team defense with your fingers.
Not exactly the best start in the world, to say the least. McGee really needs to learn from Brendan Haywood. Haywood's just as long, but uses it so much more effectively. I have no doubt that McGee has the body to be a difference-maker defensively, and he has a good mentor in Haywood.
But if the first game is any indication, he still has a ways to go before he even gets in Etan Thomas' stratosphere.
0 recs |
41 comments
Comments
DUDE
I love and agree with most everything you write, and you do an amazing job with this site, but please don’t have a kitten. I didn’t like the JMcG pick anymore than you, but jeez, this was his first remotely professional action. Let’s get him through camp and onto the bench before we flip our wigs.
I knew Manute Bol, and you sir are no Manute Bol!
by houserocker on Jul 15, 2008 10:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not flipping any wings
Or making any proclamations about the type of player McGee is going to become.
Just saying he struggled like crazy defensively in his first game, and he has to improve significantly. I don’t see what’s so ridiculous about that.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 15, 2008 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bull
You are going out of your way to rip this kid to no end. To make a “special” article on just him and his “struggle” defensively is so picky and targeted you can’t defend it. With him playing so bad and the team playing so bad, and all the travel problems…no one seemed to notice Wizards almost won the game. This ripping of a rookie that has not played one game for OUR TEAM has really gotten out of hand..I could understand ripping EG for picking him because you did not agree with the selection, but the kid has not done a thing to deserve what he is getting from guys like you on this board.
by LoneWiz54 on Jul 16, 2008 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Completely Disagree
The kid was our only draft pick. I interpret no sinister motives for doing an analysis on our new draft pick’s defensive game after his first summer league game. We’re all Wizards fans here, and all of us should be over our disappointment that McGee was our draft pick by now. We all want him to do well and improve, but analyzing his defensive game gives us all insight that’s good to have. We now all know what to watch for as his game progresses.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 16, 2008 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
And I don’t see the point in tracking a kid minute by minute in his first game of the summer when we all know he is going to take awhile before he is NBA ready. its kinda like checking on a thanksgiving day turkey 10 minutes after you put it in the oven. Surprise! Its not ready yet.
by Jheiser3 on Jul 16, 2008 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Woudn't Mind
I wouldn’t mind seeing every Wizards player tracked minute by minute in every game they play. It’s not pointless to study players, but rather it’s insightful. After seeing McGee’s WAC All-Defensive Team selection and reading the DraftExpress article on him, I for one was curious about just how good or bad his defensive game really was. Now I know. As a fan of basketball, I wouldn’t consider this information pointless.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 16, 2008 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i can only hope
the wizards coaching staff is doing something similar.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jul 16, 2008 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they aren't
They scouted him already. They know his strengths and weaknesses from watching every college game he played in. They don’t have to tivo-dissect his summer league games to know he needs improvement.
by Jheiser3 on Jul 16, 2008 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
There’s no such thing as too much information.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 16, 2008 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure there is
Thats where the phrase paralysis by analysis came from.
by Jheiser3 on Jul 16, 2008 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Paralysis By Analysis?
Dude, we’re all fans here. Paralysis by analysis is a phrase used to describe indecisive leaders/decision-makers who can’t make a decision timely enough because they’re too busy analyzing the available information or planning the proposed project. We, on the other hand, don’t get to make decisions about our teams. We analyze information for the sole purpose of learning more about our team and about basketball in general. So for our purposes, Prada is right, there is no such thing as too much information.
If you don’t appreciate the work he puts into such excercises, that’s fine, you don’t have to waste your time reading it. But I for one am glad he takes the time to analyze such things. I learn more about my favorite team and things to watch for as our players develop. For example, if Javale McGee does become a great defender some day, we will all remember how far he came and credit the appropriate causes (i.e. Randy Ayers, Javale’s dedication, other assistant coach(es)). How will we know what/whom to credit? By continuing to analyze things the way Prada has done.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 16, 2008 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
seems to me
if someone broke it down on tape for him, it’d help him to understand what he needs to improve on. couldn’t hurt.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jul 16, 2008 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And my point is if the young man, pardon the analogy, needs help learning how to walk a coach isn’t going to spend his time teaching him how to high jump. Nor is any one involved in his teaching going to be surprised by his proficiency at this stage.
Next analogy: JaVale is a blank canvas. I’m not going to spend hours pointing out the whitest spots. I see now that its entertaining for others. You all have at it.
by Jheiser3 on Jul 16, 2008 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't think you can dismiss out of hand
tracking as a coaching tool.
i also don’t think cutting off the lane or grabbing a defensive rebound is high jumping. that seems more like walking to me.
and whether someone is a project or not, to me, has no bearing on whether someone should be tracked. maybe the coaches point this stuff out to him and then they track him the next time and he makes less mistakes. and then the player improves. at least that’s what you hope for…
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jul 16, 2008 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and...
what’s the point of a summer league game if no one is going to study or coach from it? they may have scouted him, but this is the first time the coaching staff is seeing him play in a league game together, in person, under their tutelage.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jul 16, 2008 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we all realize....
That it’s early.
But to me, there’s nothing wrong with tracking what a player does on defensive possessions. It’s the kind of in depth coverage that’s inherit to a blog like this.
Sure, it’s his first summer league game, and sure there’s the travel issue.
But you don’t think that McGee was playing hard out there to impress like it’s an important college game?
I’m not attempting to be the ultimate defender of this post, as it does read a little harsh in my opinion….but that’s also what was seen and we should all realize that JaVale’s growing pains, and criticism of them, need to be taken with a grain of salt at times.
The point is, the next time you watch McGee, you are certainly going to be aware and looking for how quick he is to jump on pump fakes and whether or not he is stepping up in the paint to meet penetrating offense.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on Jul 16, 2008 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So
So at the end of that minute by minute breakdown of a 19 year old kid’s first NBA summer league the consensus is… he needs time to develop.
Check.
by Jheiser3 on Jul 15, 2008 11:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We'll be loving him tomorrow.......(maybe)
Great break down.
Seems like the big issue with McGee is discipline….as by most accounts, he showed similar traits in college.
For one, I’m sure he was trigger happy on many possessions against the Blazers…..can’t blame him.
Two, he must catch up with the athletes of today’s NBA.
There have been varied guesses on the shape of McGee’s learning curve.
Let’s keep an eye on discipline tomorrow, then we’ll really learn something about the kid.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on Jul 15, 2008 11:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tomorrow's project
Is tracking Nick Young’s defense, but I’ll keep an eye on JaVale as well.
Maybe someone else can watch JaVale while I watch NY1.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 15, 2008 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't like the pick either
Especially after seeing how Mario Chalmers, Darrell Arthur, and J.J. Hickson have performed so far in Summer League play.
It has nothing to do with Points, Rebounds, Blocks or Assists – but with how they look out on the court. Chalmers, Arthur and Hickson look like they BELONG on an NBA court… McGee looks like he’s lost – or at least needs a lot of work (like maybe 2 more years in College?)
When the Wizards made the pick, I didn’t understand the reasoning (and still don’t).. They passed up players that could obviously help them this year, for a project.
Chalmers, especially, looks like he’s ready to step in as a backup Point Guard THIS year for Miami. In the Orlando Summer League, he averaged about 25 minutes per game and 15.8 points (on 40% shooting), 5.4 Assists, 2 Steals in 5 games.. More important than his stats was the fact that he looked like he belonged. He didn’t seemed rushed. He didn’t seem lost. He looked confident and competent. He looked like a Professional Basketball Player.
by Rook6980 on Jul 15, 2008 11:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm Warming Up to the Pick
Mario Chalmers would have been nice, but we ended up getting a more polished NBA point guard in Dee Brown and for less money to boot. Darrell Arthur and J.J. Hickson are both 6’9” power forwards. Last time I checked, we already have a decent 6’9” power forward and a couple of other backup PFs (Blatche, Songaila) that are both more NBA-ready than either Arthur or Hickson.
The fact is, we really needed to grab a center and McGee was probably the best available at that point. His game is raw and unpolished, but he can be taught the game. Arthur and Hickson can never be taught to be 7’0” with a 7’6” wingspan.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 16, 2008 8:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What a surprise!!!!
Cold soup warmed over. You can come to the same conclusion for over half the Wizards vets too. Next year, or the year after you all will be looking like fans.
by LoneWiz54 on Jul 16, 2008 12:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Of Course We Will
Next year, or the year after you all will be looking like fans.
If he plays well, why wouldn’t we be? We are all Wizards fans here. That doesn’t mean we can’t criticize a player’s game when we see obvious deficiencies that need to be worked on and improved.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jul 16, 2008 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
YouTube
Look for my new video, in which I dye my hair different colors, wear a lot of makeup and film myself under a sheet weeping, “Leave JaVale aloooooooooooooooooone!”
"Now, obviously individual production does not unilaterally equal better team production, but there's a high level of causation."
by Vanilla Gorilla on Jul 16, 2008 9:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow, Pradamaster taking friendly fire
Dude, I would love for JaVale to be great too. But we should be free to criticize and love the Wizards on this blog. Most of us watched every game this team played this year, and also watched the games when the most you could get out of it was a free t-shirt. Les Boulez are always going to do dumb things and be snake bitten at times (see injuries to our stars the last two years). We should have fun praising them and smashing them as we see fit.
This is the same team that featured Manute Bol and Mugsy Bogues. That’s funny. Big Georghe. JaVale is a part of that proud tradition. It’s like gossiping with your friends about your other friends. It doesn’t mean you don’t love them dearly. Awesome post as always, Pradaman. Wish I had all day to break down film.
by Unselds on Jul 16, 2008 10:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This was good and necessary
Because we were told when he was picked, McGee is a good defensive player and that’s one of the reasons to pick him along with his upside and that he is a legit 7 feet. Well good fundamentals on defense is something you can learn in college, even at Nevada! And as Pradamaster has showed us, his defensive prowess was purely physical talent and not grounded in any kind of fundamental understanding of how to play defense from his position. That’s a sobering thought and of course we all knew McGee is a project, but I guess I didn’t realize how much of a project he is. And therein lies my problem with this draft choice.
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on Jul 16, 2008 10:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
but those fadeaway bank shots!
just kidding.
anyway i reserve all my vitriol for blatche. i don’t want to see any of this in his next game:
1 dribbling the ball up the court himself to start a “fast break”
2 driving from the top of the key and incorporating two spin moves on the same possession. for that matter, even one spin move on a dribble drive.
3 pretty much any crossover
4 pump faking from 18 feet, dribbling left, and shooting a fadeaway from 20 feet.
5 driving across the lane and flipping up an antawn jamison floater.
6 dribbling into traffic and then trying to throw a fancy pass that almost always ends up in a turnover.
7 pretty much any isolation for him on the wing or baseline where he starts 20 feet away from the hoop.
here’s what i’d like to see:
1 – operate out of the low post.
2 – operate out of the high post
3 – shoot over the top of people rather than try to go around them, particularly wide open 15 footers from the baseline or near the top of the key
4 – (god forbid) move without the ball, set screens, and be active on the glass.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jul 16, 2008 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll track Blatche in the third game
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 16, 2008 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're gonna end up tracking everybody.
I’ll save you a little trouble, I did McGuire last game:
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
Q4:
Very interesting.
Actually, I think its a good idea to take an in depth look at a different player each game, but I also think given the circumstances (travel issues, first game, etc.) McGee should be tracked in the last summer league if anything.
The Washington Wizards: providing career scoring nights for unknown opposing bench players since 2004.
by mamemimo on Jul 16, 2008 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
funny post
macguire was much better when he played with energy and threw his body around. he’s trying to develop his game, and ends up taking away from what he does best.
unfortunately he’s in a tough spot, because he’s probably too undersized to be a banger in the nba, and not skilled or quick enough to be a wing player.
i do love his highlight reel blocks, but i don’t think that’s going to be enough.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jul 16, 2008 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a good idea
I was hoping to track someone every game if I had time, but the idea of looking at McGee again is a good one. It’ll be interesting to see how he’s developed.
My original plan:
-Portland: McGee’s defense
-Philadelphia: Nick Young’s defense or offense (whichever people prefer)
-Cleveland: Andray Blatche’s offense (also, J.J. Hickson)
-Houston: Dee Brown’s offense
-Phoenix: Dominic McGuire
Now, I’m thinking of doing McGee for the Phoenix game, switching Blatche and Young (because Blatche will be matched up with Thaddeus Young tonight), and foregoing Dee Brown.
But really, you guys get to decide. What would you rather see?
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 16, 2008 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
If anyone knows, I’ll upload my raw notes somewhere on the site.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 16, 2008 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like it!
I like looking at McGee “under the microscope” a second time….
See if he learns anything.
I think you can skip Dee Brown.. and Skip McGuire = but if Pecherov plays, perhaps in game 4, you could do him instead. After all, he’s the one returning Wizard that the fans know very little about.
by Rook6980 on Jul 16, 2008 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plan
Keep Dee Brown – forget Taser. I like Taser, but no one is expecting much from the guy and his game is so offensively limited that really all you are doing is looking at defense and rebounding. Dee Brown is a recent addition and relatively unknown quantity and it would be informative to see if the guy can handle the point for this team.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jul 16, 2008 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Take this observation for what it's worth
JaVale has a great skill-set: He can run well, has nice hands, legitimate 3 point range, and he’s a solid shot-blocker. What was missing was his ability to integrate those skills into the offense and defense. At this point in his career, he just doesn’t seem to have a feel for the game.
This is completely speculative, but I think this goes back to his upbringing. Since he was raised with parents that played pro ball, they knew how to instill a work ethic and how to drill him to develop his skills, but it seems like they focused more on developing his skills than playing the game. A lot of things that JaVale excels at are things that can be worked on alone in a gym or with a partner (shooting, running, etc.), but the things he struggles at are things you just have to work on by playing (defensive rotations, boxing out, and the like).
I know that’s some lame analysis, but that’s what stuck out for me on Monday night.
Bullets Forever: Where fancy numbers and YouTube come together.
by JakeTheSnake on Jul 16, 2008 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But...
...no one on the Wizards boxes out either. Where’s McGee gonna learn that?
The Washington Wizards: providing career scoring nights for unknown opposing bench players since 2004.
by mamemimo on Jul 16, 2008 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh that's easy
He’ll learn from David Thorpe, of course.
Bullets Forever: Where fancy numbers and YouTube come together.
by JakeTheSnake on Jul 16, 2008 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's summer league
I think you are being a little over analytical for the first summer league game of the year. Summer league is a notch above meaningless.
by Buddha Brown on Jul 16, 2008 4:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well then
I might as well shut this site down for two weeks. I don’t think anyone would like that.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jul 16, 2008 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To Prada
Don’t worry about the criticism – if people don’t like the “overanalysis” then they don’t have to read the post.
To all: Bottom line, we all know this is a summer league game and it’s not the end-all be-all. As Prada says, this is merely information. A play-by-play breakdown of McGee’s deficiencies is useful – I don’t care if it is a summer league or NBA game, if the summer league is so worthless then why do NBA teams go to all the trouble? Maybe all we learned is that the guy needs a lot of work. I think Prada’s analysis does a bit more than that; it helps dispell the notion that this guy is a natural defensive phenom (just read Wilbon’s post-draft article) who will be throwing junk all over the place, and it helps confirm the pre-draft analysis by prognosticators such as draftexpress. That said, perhaps the dude will learn at a high rate of speed and this will be old news in a month. Whatever happens, it doesn’t change the fact that as of Sum. League Game 1, his defense sucked. I don’t think Prada drew much more of a conclusion than that; his post was solid objective analysis. That’s what this site is all about, imho.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jul 16, 2008 7:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















