Pollin': Sheed or no Sheed?
In a narrow vote, Caron's running hook shot took the honor of being the best trick shot this season. Originally the plan was to have this week's poll focus on what was the best dramatic shot of the season, but I think I'm going to hold off on that one for a week. Instead, I'm going to direct this week's question to something that's fresher in all of our minds.
Last week, the Pistons were eliminated in the Eastern Conference Finals for the third consecutive year, leading some Pistons fans to clamor that it's time to shake up the roster. Last month, the Wizards were eliminated in the Eastern Conference Quarterfinals for the third consecutive year, leading some Wizards fans to clamor that it's time to shake up the roster.
I think you know where I'm going with this.
From the looks of it, Rasheed looks like he's the odd man out in Detroit's potential shake-up, especially since his contract expires next season. So the question becomes, would you try to make a move to get Rasheed Wallace? Before you make your choice, consider the following:
Pros
- Rasheed would give an instant and significant boost to the Wizards' defense.
- His brand of craziness might just be what the doctor ordered to get this core over the hump.
- Quotes like this would endear him to most Washington fans.
- A change of scenery and a contract year might be just what the doctor ordered to give Sheed's game a boost.
- He'd instantly bring more credibility to the trick shot department.
Cons
- We've already got enough perimeter-oriented big men.
- His brand of craziness might just turn the locker room from playful to volatile.
- I think this quote from Blazers Edge commenter Mortimer kind of sums it up: "Sheed was like a rock star. A rock star who could make #1 hits any time he wanted, sell the most albums, but decided that being that popular wasn’t cool so kept his music more obscure. That is fine if you are a rockstar, but so damn annoying if you are so extremely talented as Sheed was, and an athlete."
- Changing up the roster at this point, especially with someone as unpredictable as Rasheed, might ruin whatever progress was made over the last 4 years.
- He'd instantly bring more credibility to the technicals and fines department.
Right now, without looking into options for a possible trade, I'd have to say no. He's certainly an intriguing player that could add a lot to this team under the right circumstances, but I just think that the risks outweigh the benefits at this point. If Gilbert or Antawn don't come back, then I'd definitely consider trying to make a move.
I know Sheed is one of the more polarizing players in the league, so I'm interested in seeing how people feel about this one. I don't know if the fact that he was drafted by the Bullets factors into the decision or not, but it gives me an excuse to post this;
0 recs |
18
comments
Read Related
Comments
I'm Beginning to Change My Mind
My first instinct was to say yes, so that’s the way I voted. But after thinking it over, I don’t think it would be such a good idea to acquire Rasheed. Yes, the Wizards desperately need low-post defense. Rasheed is a terrific defender. But the Wizards would also need that low-post player to rebound, and Rasheed only averages 7.8 rebounds per 36 minutes. Considering that he would probably be taking Antawn’s position, that means the Wizards would be losing 1.7 rebounds per 36 minutes at the PF. Plus, if he takes Antawn’s spot, that means Ernie has to let Antawn go. If Antawn leaves, then Gilbert leaves too, unless he changes his mind (not out of the question).
Come to think of it, having both Antawn and Gilbert leave might be the only way the Wizards can afford to sign Rasheed, unless Ernie does a sign and trade with either of his two free agents. Without Antawn or Gilbert, the Wizards would be a young team that wouldn’t be able to handle Sheed’s antics. Sheed needs to go to veteran team that can use his skills but won’t get too distracted by all of the baggage that he’d bring into the locker room. It just doesn’t work for the Wizards.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 3, 2008 8:17 AM EDT 0 recs
yes, only if
there was a way to keep at least two of our Big Three. As proven when Larry Brown was coaching the Pistons, the right staff (and team) can dilute ‘Sheed’s craziness.
And he wouldn’t have to be “The Man” here if Arenas is still around. Again, I’m all for trading away some youth for a proven vet (and champion).
by Pryme on Jun 3, 2008 10:29 AM EDT 0 recs
If it was just a matter of adding him to the mix then I could get behind it. Sheed would probably be a terrible fit playing for a coach like Eddie though. Sheed needs to find a home where he can play for a guy with rings, another reason I think Charlotte is a possibility. There is no one here, outside of AJ, that he would respect.
He’d bring an edge we don’t have enough of on this roster. Detroit would actually have to want something we have. The only guy that fits their team is Caron. Subtracting Caron for the sake of adding one season of Sheed makes no sense. Even if we could get out from under Etan contract too, I wouldn’t do that deal.
The time to get Sheed was last year. Same could be said for the time for Detroit to get rid of him I guess. I really like the guy as a player and as a man off the court.
by Jheiser3 on Jun 3, 2008 10:44 AM EDT 0 recs
THE EXODUS STARTS
BSPN just ‘scrolled’ that the Pistons have fired Flip Saunders. Not really an inidication of what they’ll do personnel wise, but they are obviously making some of the changes predicted.
'he nails an open three from the corner....just like you and me, this one was made by penetration' - Truthaboutit - Round 1 Game 5 Recap
by KDP on Jun 3, 2008 11:17 AM EDT 0 recs
Rasheed vs. Garnett
You guys might have seen this, but I thought this contrast between Rash-weed and The Big Ticket was very interesting.
from detnews.com
Watching Wallace battle Boston’s Kevin Garnett - two of the elite power forwards of our time - offered a fascinating contrast in personalities.Off the court, Garnett can be a jerk. He is rude to ball boys and locker room attendants. He gets himself so intensely wound before games, he’s even a jerk to his teammates at times.
But on the court, Garnett is the perfect teammate. He plays hard every second he’s on the floor. He shares the ball. He executes the game plan completely and without questioning anything. If the coach says to cut, he cuts. If the coach says to play zone, he plays zone.
Wallace off the court is one of the warmest and funniest guys in the league. There isn’t a ball boy or locker room attendant that he hasn’t tipped lavishly. You think back on all the things he has done - buying championship belts for his teammates, working patiently and tirelessly with the young guys on the team, working tirelessly for underprivileged kids in the community - he has a heart of gold.
But on the court, Wallace can be a jerk. There are times, because he is so ridiculously skilled, he just gets bored and lax. He doesn’t always agree with the game plan, but instead of arguing about it before the game, he sometimes tries to rebel against it during the game.
His passion to win is every bit as strong as Garnett’s, but Wallace too often channels that passion into negative energy. And because his personality is so large and dominant on this team, once he goes to the dark side, he generally takes the team there with him.
by Truth About It on Jun 3, 2008 12:29 PM EDT 0 recs
This is a great example of the classic post season local media scapegoat treatment. They think Rasheed will be moved so they singling him out. Happens in almost every town in every sport. Working with younger guys on the team is not a public service, thats a professional service that makes your team better. Garnett’s emotion often got his teams out of sync and contributed to his long history of playoff failure. The difference in Boston is that he has deliberately deferred to Pierce making Garnett ‘an elite PF of our time’ that needs Paul freakin Pierce to cover his ass.
Whats interesting that Sheed’s teammates have always said the opposite. His energy is not negative its positive. When he gets his temper up its help them get up too. Who else on that team is emotional at all? Tayshaun is a statue. Billups goes with the flow. Rip gets a little fired up but has no idea what to do with it. Flip? Please. He is their fire. Now add to that the fact that he again trailed Kobe Bryant in technicals, yet Rasheed plays with a target on his back while Kobe is basically untouchable.
by Jheiser3 on
Jun 3, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Plus....
Rasheed leads the middle of the Pistons Dance circle.
by Truth About It on
Jun 3, 2008 5:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Was thinking...
How much better is Sheed than Blatche at this point? Honestly, I see AB contributing more than Wallace for the next season. I also don’t think he will contribute as much as Haywood. Don’t be nostalgic, this isn’t the Sheed of five years ago.
by zeke5123 on Jun 3, 2008 12:55 PM EDT 0 recs
Well
Sheed is better than both Haywood and Blatche right now, but yeah, he is getting up there in years.
I just don’t see the point of Sheed if we’re already bringing back Jamison, who does all the things Sheed does anyway.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Pradamaster on
Jun 3, 2008 1:00 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Except Play Excellent Defense
Jamison has improved, but Sheed can shut down opposing PFs.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on
Jun 3, 2008 2:21 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Really?
Kevin Garnett would disagree
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Pradamaster on
Jun 3, 2008 2:23 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Key Word - "Can"
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on
Jun 3, 2008 2:29 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I slept on this one and it ‘dawned’ on me that this team is in no position to limit their views about a player based on one match-up in the Eastern Conference Finals. Its the easy way out that can be used toward every team, let alone those who bow out in the first round for the 3rd straight season.
by Jheiser3 on
Jun 4, 2008 10:32 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I know PER isn't everything
But Haywood had a higher PER than Sheed. Andray’s was lower but him progressing and Sheed regressing, I think both Haywood and Blatche will do better next year than Sheed.
by zeke5123 on Jun 3, 2008 1:07 PM EDT 0 recs
So about half of you would make a move for Sheed
Who’d you offer Detroit that would work under the cap?
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Pradamaster on Jun 3, 2008 5:27 PM EDT 0 recs
I'm not touching that one.....I voted no.
I bet the yeses are more whimsical than anything.
by Truth About It on
Jun 4, 2008 9:09 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I voted yes because the team could certainly use him. BUT I acknowledged we have nothing Detroit wants.
by Jheiser3 on Jun 4, 2008 10:28 AM EDT 0 recs
I would barely take him for free
Mostly for the reasons mentioned above – though I do think he’s a super smart player on the court. But there’s no practical way we could get him without majorly altering the team anyway. I don’t see him putting us over the top at all.
Getting buckets since 2003.
by Icantfeelmyface on Jun 4, 2008 7:32 PM EDT 0 recs










