Chad Ford Mock Draft v6.0
Chad Ford recently has us picking 2 PFs in his latest mock draft. We're going for talent instead of need?
about 1 year ago
Wizards
6 comments
0 recs |
Comments
No we are going for NEED!!
The past 2 playoffs against Cavs have shown that this team is soft inside. It needs a real POWER fordward that will not back down and will know the crap out of anyone willing to venture inside. No one on this team fills that need now or potentially. If Wizards could get these 2 power forwards and trade Ethan, and come up with a defense minded backup at PG, I say it would have been a great draft day!!
by LoneWiz54 on Jun 24, 2008 9:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So Darrell Arthur is not the answer then
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2008 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chad Chad Chad
If you’re looking for strength inside Darrell Arthur (6’8.5 in shoes, 216 pounds) is NOT the answer. Lebron isn’t going to steer clear of the lane because we added another forward who is shorter and lighter/weaker than he is. Arthur measures more like a SF, ecept that he doesn’t have the shooting range you’d expect from a SF. So he’s a solid rebounding, athletic SF who is not an adept passer or ball handler/dribbler. Its like they took Jamison and subtracted his scoring ability and 3 point shot.
Arthur duplicates the skills we get from AJ, Blatche, Songalia and Pesh while not addressing these same players’ weaknesses. Arthur also doesn’t do well in terms of WIN score.
Whats worse, if you’re Chad Ford, is that not one but 5 or 6 preferable bigs are still on the board when he slaps Arthur on his sheet in the 18 hole.
At 47 is at least brings in a guy who’s nearly as big as Lebron even though there are several preferable names on the board
by Jheiser3 on Jun 24, 2008 1:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
duplication, yeah
but can you make an argument for arthur possibly being the best player available at 18? the dude seems like he has some talent.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Jun 24, 2008 2:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If Speights is there
And we take Arthur instead, I’ll be pretty upset.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2008 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does Chad Ford Know Anything About the Wizards?
Chad Ford appears to give reasonable analysis for every team up until the Wizards, then says the Wizards will draft Arthur because they might lose Jamison? That’s his only rationale? Did he even watch the Wizards, at least in the playoffs? Why in the world does he think our team needs another short, soft, skinny PF? It’s almost as if he was running late on his column deadline and threw something together for the Wizards in about 5 seconds. He has absolutely no understanding of our team’s biggest needs.
Of course, if he’s right and the Wizards do draft Arthur, I think I’d cry.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Jun 25, 2008 8:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

















