Wizards in 6
I'm minutes away from heading off to Israel for the week, so I suppose I should give some sort of reason why I'm so confident in a Wizards first-round victory. Frankly, if we don't win this series, I'll be extremely disappointed. The only way Cleveland wins this series is if we lose concentration of their rebounders, fail to close out on their few three-point shooters, and let LeBron go off. The first won't happen with this Wizards team, and the second is contingent on the Cavs actually making their threes, which hasn't happened enough this year. The third is a harsh reality, but LeBron can't beat us himself; he'll need help.
Cleveland's two strengths are LeBron and rebounding, but since the trade, they're just 14-13 (the Wizards are 18-9 over that stretch). Their defense was a third strength last year, but it has fallen off considerably this season. Shooting, which was supposed to be a strength post-trade, hasn't been, and things won't be any better with Damon Jones on the pine. LeBron's also been ailing with a bad back, and Sasha Pavlovic isn't going to play in the series. As we're getting healthy, they remain in flux.
To prove why they're vulnerable, let's look at the difference in some key efficiency numbers from last year to this year.
| Stat | 2006/2007 | 2007/2007 |
|
Offense |
106.8 | 107.7 |
| eFG% | 48.4 | 48.2 |
| ToR | 15.8 | 15.6 |
| OREB% | 29.7 | 30.3 |
| FT/FG | 22.3 | 22 |
| Defense | 103 | 108 |
| eFG% | 48 | 49.5 |
| ToR | 17 | 14.9 |
| OREB% | 24.2 | 24 |
| FT/FG | 24.3 | 24 |
Offensively, they're a little bit better, but that's mostly because teams haven't played as much defense this year. They were 19th in the league last year, and despite scoring nearly a point more per 100 possessions, they're 19th again this year. Most of that improvement can be traced to LeBron, who has had a significantly better regular season this time around.
But look at those defensive numbers. Their defensive efficiency is five points wrose than last year, when they were one of the best defensive teams in the league. Their biggest strength last year was preventing second shot attempts, and that hasn't changed.
So what has? Two things. First, the loss of Larry Hughes has improved the offense, but has really hurt the defense. Cleveland is turning teams over far less frequently this year, and most of that is because Hughes isn't there to play the passing lanes. The trade for Ben Wallace created a redundancy, because Cleveland already rebounded really well, at the cost of perimeter defense. That's really good news for us, because we are such a perimeter-oriented team. Hughes bothered Gilbert Arenas and Caron Butler when he played for the Cavs. Now that he's not there, who guards our Big 3? Devin Brown needs to be huge defensively for Cleveland's perimeter defense to have a chance.
Secondly, their effective field goal percentage allowed has dropped considerably. More teams are htting their jumpers against the Cavs than ever before, and I think that once again can be tied into losing Hughes. With Hughes, the Cavs trotted out an extremely long permieter core of Hughes, Pavlovic, and James. Their length bothered jump shooters, and since Cleveland rebounded so well, it played right into their hands. Problem is that without Hughes and Pavlovic, Mike Brown is going to have to give lots of minutes to the shorter Delonte West and Daniel Gibson, as well as the slower Szczerbiak. That plays right into DeShawn Stevenson's hands, because Stevenson is going to have more open looks from three-point range. He's hitting them extremely well right now, so Cleveland should be worried.
There's one more reason I'm confident. Besides LeBron and Big Z, nobody has played particularly well for Cleveland all year. Gibson has been hurt, Anderson Varejao has his contract problems, and West and Sczcerbiak have struggled since coming over from Seattle. Joe Smith has been decent, but he will have to be spectacular in this series, and he hasn't been nearly as good since he was traded from Chicago. In short, when LeBron is struggling, who does Cleveland have to pick up the slack?
Contrast that with us. With the injuries we've suffered all year, our bench guys have played key minutes. All of them have improved significantly since the beginning of the year. Darius Songaila has gone from hated to beloved because of his improved play. Roger Mason has come out of nowhere to be a bench spark that could win us a game if he shoots well from outside. Andray Blatche has slowly provided more consistent minutes for us as well, and if Nick Young is used, he's had the experience to play well in key spots. And don't forget about Gilbert, who is coming off his best game of the season.
In short, Cleveland may have the best player, but we have the far deeper team. In a series where both offenses can create mismatches all over the court, that will be the difference.
Wizards in 6. Book it.
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
My Pessimism is Dormant
Israel? That’s awesome – what for?
Great analysis. I would say Wizards in 5. My Dad’s got season tickets, I’m out at school in Utah, and if I’m going to make a trip back, I think I’d rather see the Wiz against the Celtics. I’m so confident that the Wiz are going to win this series, that I’ll forego flying back for this first series.
by se7en on Apr 17, 2008 12:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Visiting my brother
For Passover.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on Apr 17, 2008 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For some reason I don’t see the Wiz winning a game 7 on the road…so I think it has to be in 6…I personally believe if we take one of the first 2 away games, the series is ours… I do disagree with all the excess trash talking though…
by DynaMix on Apr 17, 2008 1:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Confidence - Its what's for dinner.
Agree – Wiz in six. I think its as simple as trends here. The Wizards have been on their way up, the Cavs on their way down.
The Washington Wizards: providing career scoring nights for unknown opposing bench players since 2004.
by mamemimo on Apr 17, 2008 2:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I disagree with the trends argument...
While obviously the Cavs and Bullets are trending in different directions, you must ask why. The Bullets got better (trends improved) because their roster improved (they got one of the most dynamic players in the association back). The Cavs roster got worse, explaining their downward trend. I don’t believe the Bullets will win because they have been playing better or the Cavs worse, I believe they will win (and in 5) because they have the better team which the trends verify.
by zeke5123 on Apr 17, 2008 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have always
been drinking the D-Song Kool-Aid. Moves without the ball and does the little things. Plus, he rocks one of those Bill Simmon’s approved wispy beards.
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on Apr 17, 2008 3:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hollinger predicts wiz in 6
after predicting 33 wins for the wiz, and then writing a column about how great cleveland’s midseason trade was (by saying the new players cumulative PERs were higher than the jettisoned ones), now he’s predicting the wiz in 6?! go figure. let’s hope he finally gets it right with this prediction!!!!!!
i think we are primed and ready. can’t wait.
on a different note, i saw some of the game last night and the lineup of mason, young, macguire, pecherov, and blatche looked absolutely horrid – particularly pecherov. that’s looking like another 0-for summer league team this season. slightly disappointing.
no matter. only mason and blatche and possibly young figure to play roles in the playoffs so bring on the cavs!
by DarrellWalkerFan on Apr 17, 2008 3:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Like Hollinger
I find his analysis very compelling, particularly because of his dependence on stats, which don’t lie. That said, statistics are a lot better at analyzing what happened than they are at predicting what will happen. That is why I believe his prediction on the Wizards in the preseason was wrong.
There were a lot of unknowns that came together for the Wizards this season that nobody that doesn’t follow this team closely could have predicted. Jamison and Butler’s numbers both went up substantially. The rookies played well. Roger Mason Jr. emerged out of nowhere as a legitimate scoring threat. Randy Ayers significantly improved the defense from last year. Brendan stopped playing like Brenda and also started making over 70% of his free throws. These are things that last year’s statistics couldn’t have told Hollinger. Had those things not happened, the Wizards would have a similar record to the Atlanta Hawks and Hollinger’s predicition would have come true.
However, now Hollinger can see all of those things in this year’s statistics. Which is why even though Cleveland might have improved themselves with their trade, they are still not a better team than the Wizards, at least not on paper. Hollinger can see this, which is why he is picking the Wizards in 6.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Apr 18, 2008 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
too biased.
is it bad to think that we might take this thing in 5?
evaflowin.blogspot.com
by eva.future on Apr 18, 2008 12:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That Would Be Difficult
Game 5 would be played in Cleveland. The Wizards would have to win two out of three in Cleveland for this scenario to work out. The Wizards are only 18-23 on the road this season. Plus you know that LeTravel is going to get more favorable calls on his home court. Here’s the most likely scenario for the Wizards winning the series:
Games 1 – 2: Wizards get a split and take the series home tied at 1-1.
Games 3 – 4: Wizards win both games at VC.
Game 5: Cavs win a close one in Cleveland, probably due to home court ref calls.
Game 6: Wizards take the series in front of the VC faithful.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on Apr 18, 2008 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
difficult.. but not impossible...
well i definitely would like to be there when the wiz wrap this series up (already goin to game 3 and 4), but i agree that i think we split game 1 and 2, take 3 and 4, and then take all that momentum into the traveliers home and finish it off in front of all their fans. thatd be jus about as great.
evaflowin.blogspot.com
by eva.future on Apr 18, 2008 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















