Anyone Else Losing Confidence in Ernie Grunfeld?
Last season, both Ernie Grunfeld and Eddie Jordan looked like geniouses. Even without Gilbert Arenas and Etan Thomas, the Wizards played tough and again managed to win over 40 games and make the playoffs for the 4th straight season. To be able to lose their best player and still look like a solid team seemed to speak volumes of the team's coaching and player depth.
But that was last season. This season, the wheels have come off. Eddie Jordan has already lost his job. And now it looks like Tapscott isn't able to do much better. Many NBA analysts have criticized the talent the Wizards have to work with. Charles Barkley has said on national TV that whoever put this team together doesn't know what he's doing. Charley Rosen thinks Eddie Jordan will be coaching again but Ernie Grunfeld will be unemployed within two years. And we all know that Truth has said all along that it's the players, stupid.
So who is responsible for the players this team has? We all know that answer, and I think it is the giant elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about right now. Certainly, we can't blame Ernie for the injuries to Haywood and Arenas. But perhaps we should be blaming him for not acquiring at least a serviceable backup to Brendan. Perhaps we should also be blaming him for not adding players that can play anything resembling respectable defense. The lack of depth on this team is astounding. This is not a supporting cast that can help a team win a championship by any stretch of the imagination.
So even though I haven't completely lost faith in Ernie, watching this season unfold is admittedly making me doubt him a little. I'm curious what everyone else things now that I've broken the ice on this issue.
This represents the view of the user who wrote the FanPost, and not the entire Bullets Forever community. We're a place of many opinions, not just one.
0 recs |
31 comments
Comments
As always, it's all about Gilbert
If Gilbert comes back this year and is able to finish the season without another knee injury, everything will be better. If he doesn’t, the team gets blown up. It already feels like we’ve regressed back to the good ole days of Michael Adams and Wes Unseld. I mean, we’re talking about Wes Unseld Jr. as head coach, for god’s sake! Wes Sr. was bad enough, but at least he won the MVP as a rookie and a world championship as a player!
I think in the end we will look back at free agency last year as a huge mistake. There is no way that Gilbert should have received a contract that large, nor should Jamison. Many on this blog said there weren’t other options, but isn’t it a problem that Ernie backed himself into a corner and had no choice but to bow to Arenas and Jamison?
Anybody remember Mitch Richmond? Rod Strickland? Juwan Howard? All signed for way too much money in an inflated market that tied our hands. I smell Abe Pollin’s hands all over this stuff. He decided to sign Etan, Gilbert and Antwan no matter what the cost, and that is why we are where we are today.
We let Jeffries and Hughes go because they wanted too much money, then we turned around and signed a past-his-prime forward and gimpy-kneed guard for way too much money. I hope Gilbert comes back soon. We need some reason for optimism. If he shuts it down for the season, bank on next season being a disappointment again as we spend all of our time wondering if Gilbert will ever return to form. What if he comes back next November and gets hurt?
I guess what I’m saying is that you can only go on so long waiting for injuries to go away. How many years should we wait?
by Unselds on
Dec 18, 2008 9:27 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
No depth?
Arenas/Daniels/Brown
Stevenson/Young
Butler/McGuire
Jamison/Blatche/Songila
Haywood/Thomas/McG
There is the roster EG put together for this season. Looks deep to me. Take Arenas and Haywood out, as well as essentially Thomas and Daniels all due to unpredictable injury and you are left with a thin, undertalented roster.
Look at these scenarios:
Boston loses Pierce and Perkins
Orlando loses Howard and Nelson
Cleveland loses Lebron and anybody
Detroit loses Rasheed and Hamilton
Lakers lose Kobe and Bynum
N.O. loses Paul and Chandler
Denver loses Carmelo and Nene
Houston loses Yao and Alston
Do any of those teams make the playoffs? Maybe Boston. The rest of those teams turn into the current Wizards or pretty close.
Everyone around here is looking for someone to blame. The vets. The young guys. The coach. The GM. The owner. Sometimes things happen that you just can’t really blame on somebody.
Sometimes life just sucks. Life for us sucks at the moment.
by MR on
Dec 18, 2008 10:36 AM EST
reply
actions
2 recs
Good Points
Perhaps you are right. There really is nobody to blame, it is just bad luck. I still marvel at how low we have fallen, though. Will the Thunder come to town later this month and embarrass us? How much lower can we go? How can it be nobody’s fault that we are this extremely bad? It is hard to believe, but maybe it is true.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on
Dec 18, 2008 10:59 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The thing
I think the thing that everybody here has forgotten is that this is a sport, a team sport that real people play. People with emotions and psyches. Sports is all about confidence. You know the quote that sports is 90% half mental. Sports is about getting into a groove, feeling comfortable, confidence confidence confidence. Ever see a good player go to a new team and suck? Ever see a nobody go to a new team and excel? It’s a head game. And I think more than many teams, there are some fragile head cases on the Wiz. And right now the whole team is down, has no confidence, has no groove, has no momentum.
I think what the team is trying to do is to keep from drowning and hope a spark is lit, whether because of Gil’s return or because guys start coming out of their funk.
Last year many players on the team had career years. This year many are having the worst year of their careers. Hopefully we can turn that around. Probably not, but I think it’s our only hope.
by MR on
Dec 18, 2008 11:42 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Really?
I would hardly characterize the roster you laid out as deep. Look at it by position. Daniels was miserable this season, and Dee Brown no longer works in the NBA. I don’t think you can make the case that either of those guys is among the top half of backups in the league at that position. At the SG, I would say Young is a worthwhile backup, but McGuire, Blatche and Songaila are in the bottom half of backups at their position. Thomas and McGee, bottom third at best. No, I would not say our roster is anything close to deep with NBA talent.
Granted, losing your best player and your best defender to injury is a killer, so I’m not going to judge EG too harshly, but we did put nearly all our eggs in the basket of guys who are inured (Arenas), on the decline (Jamison) or just not that good (Thomas, Songaila). I still think the contracts of Blatche and Stevenson could end up looking OK (if DeShawn ever learns how to shoot again), and his recent draft picks of Young and McGee look good, but cuppett’s criticism is right on, IMO.
"Now, obviously individual production does not unilaterally equal better team production, but there's a high level of causation."
by Vanilla Gorilla on
Dec 18, 2008 11:42 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Again: roster as constructed
PG: Daniels when healthy is an excellent backup PG. He has not been healthy this year. Dee Brown is a fine 3rd PG.
SG: Good starter who fits in the starting 5 well. Good spark plug off the bench.
SF: I think we all agreed that this was our weak spot backup-wise in the preseason.
PF: One young developing backup, one solid smart vet backup. Neither great, but I think both are solid backups at their position.
C: Pre-condition Thomas was one of the better backup centers. Again, this is an injury and I think his recovery has been terrible. Rookie 3rd option for mop up time.
Yes. I think that is a deep roster.
And BTW I don’t think Jamison is on the decline.
by MR on
Dec 18, 2008 12:10 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Disagree
Daniels was bad as a starter…. but as New Orleans is finding out, he’s a perfect 10-15 minute backup PG… That is why he was brought to Washington …. except, now he is doing it in New Orleans. Giving the All-Star starting PG 10-15 minutes rest each night… running the Offense… not turning the ball over… and bringing a veteran calmness to a young second unit. When he was forced to start and play extended minutes against front line PG’s, Daniels’ flaws (lack of lateral quickness, no jump shot, lack of foot speed) were exposed – and teams took advantage.
Same with Songaila – he’s not supposed to be the backup Center. He was supposed to be a 10 minute backup for the PF slot (Jamison). When he plays his role (10-15 minutes at PF), he’s a pretty good backup – - – - When he’s used out of position or for extended minutes (especially against the NBA’s starting PF’s), his flaws are exposed.
The Center position should also have been covered. Haywood is a capable, if not All-Star caliber center. Thomas was supposed to bring energy for 15 minutes. Instead, Thomas doesn’t seem to have fully recovered from his heart surgery and JaVale McGee, although showing flashes of brilliant play, is not ready for regular minutes… So the Wizards have to play two Power Forwards (Blatche and Songaila) at Center. Things would be VERY different if Haywood were healthy…. Then you could afford to have McGee come in for 10-12 minutes each night and get some experience against 2nd team Centers.
The starting unit was supposed to have 3 All-Stars, and two competent, complimentary players. With young talent and savvy veterans behind them.
NO – I disagree. This team, when healthy was pretty deep. Some of that depth was young (McGee, Young)… and some of that depth had some limitations (Songaila, Daniels) – but the overall depth was fine – UNTIL………….
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on
Dec 18, 2008 12:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmmm
I’ll concede that my assessment of Daniels as a subpar backup was overly harsh. You’re right; he has done exactly what you’d want a backup PG to do for NO. But his performance as a Wizard this season was awful.
If Songaila is supposed to be a 10-minute PF backup, then that’s ANOTHER problem; it’s crazy to pay so much to a guy you you expect to contribute so little.
As for McGee, I like the way he’s played and I love his potential, but the significant flaws in his game are many and very obvious. I stand behind my assessment that he’s a subpar backup center at this point.
If this team was “pretty deep” when healthy, I’m not sure I see how it can be so unrepentantly awful even with two starters gone (one of whom was gone last season too, when we won 43 games).
"Now, obviously individual production does not unilaterally equal better team production, but there's a high level of causation."
by Vanilla Gorilla on
Dec 18, 2008 3:46 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well.....it's the 'On Paper' problem
We “seemed” deep because of expected development from the likes of Nick Young and Andray Blatche, along with the continued consistency of DeShawn Stevenson…..
But with injuries AND the aforementioned falling below expectations……it’s almost easy to see how we’ve arrived to this point.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Dec 18, 2008 4:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
thanks MR for being a voice of reason around here
you also have to take into account the luxury tax issue. we’ve been threading a needle for several years. there was no choice other than to rely on rookies developing. once a number of key players went down and the young’uns aren’t busting out we’re toast. it’s a thin line at the highest level between winning and losing, especially in the NBA when your stars go down.
you could blame this on songaila and thomas’s contract, but come on. thomas’s signing was completely defensible at the time. and EG is granted one whiff on songaila with all the blockbuster good moves he’s made. the other thing is that vets weren’t exactly lining up to play in DC so he may have felt he had to overpay for a mid-tier guy.
whatever. the stars aren’t aligned this year for the wiz – or maybe they are and this is the best thing for the squad and we just haven’t realized it yet.
one caveat though: if GA isn’t the same player again, EG’s gone. no question.
by DarrellWalkerFan on
Dec 18, 2008 4:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The thing is
I think doclinkin pointed this out to me once, but it makes a lot of sense:
If you look at the type of acquisitions Ernie has made, they’ve all had Eddie Jordan’s system written all over them. Combo guards (DeShawn, Gilbert, Nick, AD), bigs who can shoot and pass (Dray, Songaila, JaVale), etc. They’ve all been Princeton players. Essentially, Ernie, even though he didn’t want Eddie really, built a team suited to his coaching.
That’s both a strength and a weakness. It’s a strength when Eddie’s here and we’re healthy, but it’s a weakness now because he’s trying to change styles with a team that mostly has Eddie holdovers.
I suppose that’s a way of saying that Ernie deserves a chance to rebuild the team in his image and that these shortcomings that are spoken of have a lot to do with syncing Eddie’s system with the right personnel.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on
Dec 18, 2008 12:22 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
There goes the first wheel, when will the next one fall off?
I guess I’m being called stupid here….and that really doesn’t matter much to me in the grand scheme of things, other than my opinion being misrepresented.
I never intended to give the impression of absolving Grunfeld and Jordan of any blame. We win and lose as a franchise.
However, it’s my opinion that excuses are being yearned for…..now all of a sudden, it’s “what’s up with these rotations?”, “our team is poorly constructed”, etc., etc. — and it’s not to say that some of these so-called excuses, or rather, “explanations” are invalid…….but simply put, not enough blame has been placed on the shoulders of those who PLAY the games.
When things go bad, it’s easy to get distracted from this point and start pointing fingers at a million different tweaks, line-up changes, minutes-watches, salary cap maneuverings, systems, and the what-not…..
The misery of this season comes down to two things:
1) Injuries.
2) Players not playing well.
All those other little complaints are collateral damage…..without #1, we may not have #2, and without #2, I’d bet a lot of money that the Wizards would be doing much better (championship material? who knows….), and all things picked and needled upon about divvied up minutes and roster structure go away…..and we’d probably be focusing on game-to-game items like “if he’d made that FT” and “oh man, can’t get beat on the boards.”
Look, no one is wrong for questioning the entire system…..it’s natural in times of frustration, but these day-to-day concerns are getting a little drastic, tedious, and unreasonable.
What I preach is more patience…..and that analyzing in every direction is somewhat pointless until we know what this team really has.
Will that every happen? Who the eff knows…..but that’s the Curse o’ Les Boulez that we all live under.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Dec 18, 2008 12:51 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Huh?
I guess I’m being called stupid here….and that really doesn’t matter much to me in the grand scheme of things, other than my opinion being misrepresented.
Who called you stupid? How did I misrepresent your opinion? I merely referenced your belief that the players are to blame for our performance woes in order to support my larger point. I never meant to imply that you are blaming EG. I know you never said that. I just wanted readers to use your point to connect the dots.
If it is the players’ fault, then you have to look to the guy who put those players together to assign responsibility. That’s my point, not yours. The buck has to stop somewhere, IMO. The players have screamed and shouted, pointed fingers through the media, preached about more effort and concentration, and still aren’t able to beat any team in the league right now. Are you suggesting that their tirades aren’t sincere? That they still aren’t giving good effort? I’m asking, not trying to put words in your mouth. If you say yes, then I respectfully disagree.
MR believes it is a confidence thing. I suppose I could buy that. But I don’t see things getting better for this team the way things are going. I mean, they’re getting drubbed by teams like the Pacers for crying out loud! And this after the veterans spoke out after the Boston massacre. The confidence of this team is in a vicious cycle downward, and I don’t think waiting is the answer. The more we wait, the more losses we pile up, the more likely that both Arenas and Haywood decide that this season isn’t worth it and sit the whole thing out. And then when will we know what we have on this team? Next season, at the earliest. And even when they do come back, how is that going to solve the complete lack of confidence the other players have in themselves and their other teammates? Once a “culture of losing” takes hold, it is really difficult to break without completely remaking the team.
Again, I’m not saying I’ve completely lost confidence in EG. I just think he has to share some of the responsibility for this mess that has been created. Hopefully he is planning the solution. I’m still searching for answers.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on
Dec 18, 2008 1:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If it is the players’ fault, then you have to look to the guy who put those players together to assign responsibility.
Ding ding ding.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on
Dec 18, 2008 2:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not that I agree
But Ernie put this group together. If it really is the players, then it’s essentially on EG.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on
Dec 18, 2008 2:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Perhaps....
I misunderstood this line:
And we all know that Truth has said all along that it’s the players, stupid.
…I’m not sure….
But to answer your questions…
I think the player tirades are sincere…..and they are trying, just not all the time.
What is lacking seems to be cohesiveness…….and maybe it’s the coaching…..and maybe that aspect comes easier with winning…….and maybe the drive and intentions of Butler and Jamison became misplaced to the team’s detriment once they found out that Gilbert Arenas would be out, again.
But there seems to be a very fine line between the winning and losing sides of cohesiveness.
Thing is, I don’t see Grunfeld doing anything drastic…..so my expectations don’t reside in the “The Wizards Need To Be Blown Up” arena…..rather, I just have hope that somehow players will get healthy so this team can mesh.
I mean, before Arenas got hurt, we all had relatively high aspirations with the roster as it is now (sans injury, etc.)……not that we are losing, the roster is suddenly the worst plan in the world.
Maybe because defensive inefficiencies, the team isn’t built for a championship, but we never got to see the possibility of Haywood 2.0 and Agent Zero……
……aww screw it, I’m at a loss. What will be, will be……
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Dec 18, 2008 2:18 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's the Players, Stupid
I meant to paraphrase the popular saying used during Bill Clinton’s first presidential campaign, “It’s the economy, stupid”.
From that Wikipedia entry:
The phrase is repeated often in American political culture, usually starting with the word “it’s” and with commentators sometimes using a different word in place of “economy.” Examples include “It’s the deficit, stupid!”; “It’s the corporation, stupid!”; “It’s the math, stupid!”; and “It’s the voters, stupid!”
In other words, I was trying to say that you were telling people that the Wizards’ problems weren’t that complicated, and to stop looking for complicated answers. Is that a misrepresentation of your opinion?
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on
Dec 18, 2008 2:25 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ah yes....
familiar with the phrase, but the prior words in the sentence clouded my awareness…..so yea, I kinda feel stupid now…oh well.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Dec 18, 2008 4:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Roster
I mean, before Arenas got hurt, we all had relatively high aspirations with the roster as it is now (sans injury, etc.)……not that we are losing, the roster is suddenly the worst plan in the world.
It probably isn’t the worst plan in the world, but I’m not sure that it is in Ernie’s plans now that he’s fired Eddie Jordan. I for one thought that the coaching would improve after that. Either I’m wrong or the players just aren’t responding. Either case requires more action from the GM, and I’m just trying to get a feel for what he’s thinking right now.
What does this team really need to compete for a championship? A new head coach? A few more good players? A complete makeover a la Boston last season? What identity does he want this team to have now that Eddie is gone? If we can answer these questions accurately, then we might know what to expect from Ernie, which can at least give us true fans some hope in order to endure what is shaping up to be a very long and painful season.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on
Dec 18, 2008 2:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I hear ya....
I just wonder what Ernie can do at this point.
I suppose he needs to get pretty creative while avoiding moves of a brash nature.
And can we all agree to throw the Boston “rebuilding” issue out the window? — just doesn’t seem like a fair standard of comparison for any GM.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Dec 18, 2008 4:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not me.
I love Ernie Grunfeld. He is patient and plays things close to the chest. I feel like a big deal is coming before next season. You don’t just make deals for the sake of making deals. He is doing what a good GM should do….waiting until something comes along that will actually make a difference. We should all be thankful that he is here and not some idiot like Steve Kerr.
This is most definitely on the players and the lack of quality coaching.
by Romans12 on
Dec 18, 2008 12:55 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah
I especially liked the Daniels for Crittenton/James deal…
We gave up Daniels expiring contract, but got back James’ expiring contract…
PLUS we got a Point Guard that was a #1 pick a year ago. Essentially getting Crittenton for free.
Crittenton has very good size for a PG, and is an extremely quick, elite level athlete. Loves to dunk on people; and he’s a pretty good defender although sometimes too aggressive defensively. He needs to work on his shot (Hoopla?), and his turn overs (experience)…. He’ll be perfect as a backup for 10 mpg behind Arenas; and as he gets more experience and a better jump shot, we may see a Crittenton / Arenas back court.
The trade gives the Wizards one more young, talented player on their roster (Young, McGee, Blatche, McGuire, Pecherov, and Crittenton) – but they didn’t sacrifice anything to get him.
The Wizards still have Mike James’ expiring contract – which, along with Thomas and Haywood, gives them $20 Million in expiring contracts and all that young talent to use as trade bait for next year.
Bullets Forever - where "Dagger ! " happens......
by Rook6980 on
Dec 18, 2008 1:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am still on board with Ernie
I’ll give him at least 2 more years so he has a chance to get out from under those crappy contracts he signed. I still have faith in the guy…. (see Kwame Brown for Caron Butler,luring Gilbert here, picking up AJ for clubhouse cancers and draft pick, drafting McGee and Blatche, and the Crittenton trade, although the jury is still out on that one)
by DT711 on
Dec 18, 2008 3:10 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
You Have Got to Be Kidding Me
Read my latest FanShot, and you’ll understand what I’m talking about. I’m not sure when the original conversation between Tapscott and Chris Mannix occurred, but if it was recent, then this is simply unbelievable.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on
Dec 18, 2008 3:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
No, the blame goes to EG
Because the roster, as constructed wasn’t that deep…
And the drafting hasn’t been great either.
Would you like Pech or Rajon Rondo at this point? Or perhaps you would prefer Josh Boone, Jordan Farmar or Renaldo Balkman?
How about Sean Williams, Carl Landry or Marc Gasol?
EG might be great on trades, but his drafting has been subpar. Which doesn’t supply me with a whole lot of faith if we end up with a ton of ping pong balls…
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on
Dec 19, 2008 4:00 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I Won't Go That Far
EG has actually done a better than average job of drafting. I wouldn’t want any player that went lower than JaVale McGee right now. And Nick Young is pretty good. He got Taser deep in the 2nd round. Same with Blatche, who is producing a lot more than most 2nd rounders in his class. And don’t forget Michael Redd.
No, I don’t blame his drafting. I blame him for not acquiring players who can play defense. I blame him for not getting enough players who can play two straight games with consistent results. I blame him for allowing the defense to suck for so long while he did nothing to improve it. I blame him for building an entire roster around a coach, and then firing that coach.
But I’m still not sure that anybody else can do better. I’m just getting frustrated with this season, and I think he needs to share in the blame for this mess.
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on
Dec 19, 2008 10:44 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Blatche in 2nd round
that was actually a decent 2nd round class.
Monta Ellis, Brandon Bass, CJ Miles, Rony Turiaf and Sweet Lou Williams were taken ahead of Blatche in the 2nd.
Ryan Gomes and Amir Johnson were taken after ’Dray.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Dec 19, 2008 11:23 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I Stand Corrected
"It's OK for the Bullets to trade baskets, as long as they can score on their end." -- Words of wisdom from Phil Chenier
by cuppettcj on
Dec 19, 2008 11:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but
The issues with Blatche, Young et al. is that they CAN’T play defense….so shouldn’t EG have addressed this issue by drafting someone who at least knows how to defend the pick and roll or box out?
As it stands Pech looks like a complete waste of a draft pick, and Blatche consistency demonstrates that he is a good 7th or 8th man off the bench at best…..
Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!
by ledellforlife on
Dec 21, 2008 1:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I like Ernie Grunfeld. I think he’s done a good job. Far from a perfect job, but a good job.
The team is in a good place. Not presently, but this record is injury induced and a poor image of where this team truly is, when the team gets Arenas+Haywood back it’s in a good place. Maybe that (players returning to the court) will happen this season, maybe not.
I thought of the team as a work in progress coming into the season. It was making a transition from players like Antonio Daniels+Etan Thomas+Darius Songaila to their younger bench players like Nick Young+Andray Blatche+McGuire. The Wizards were restructuring their team for the long haul while retaining their core and building around their strengths.
The youth were too important to the future to start trying to find players to play ahead of them. They needed court time. It was better to find players like Dee Brown, because the youngsters required an opportunity. Otherwise the club might waste something valuable there.
Like most work in progress situations, there’s potential downsides and upsides, and in the Wizards case it’s how the youth develops or not. It’s never a totally clear picture, and there is always risk. In this case some things haven’t gone as well as one would hope, but there is still time for that to change.
——————————————————-
The team has significant problems to face (1) Defense (2) The bench (3) The youth (4) the coaching (5) The virtues of the Arenas/Butler/Jamison staying together. But they’re also in a good position to make changes. They have trade assets, they have young players, they have some stars, they have some good role players. The team can engineer the moves it needs …. and I’m enthusiastic about Ernie making those calls.
———————————————————
I think the defensive issues and a few others still hold the Wizards back (good but not elite) when they’re healthy.
But if you look where this team is now and where some comparative teams like the Toronto Raptors, or the Phoenix Suns, are and the youth+star talents the Wizards hold …. Washington is in a very good place and has choices, and can continue to build and work towards putting an elite team on the floor.
Anyway, I’m still happy with Ernie. The struggles right now are ugly, but they’re not indicative of either the (1) the team at full strength (2) The possibilities for improving in the future. I think this is a team that can make changes and grow in a hurry …. and I’m happy with Ernie being the one making those calls.
http://nbaroundtable.wordpress.com/
by NBR on
Dec 24, 2008 8:57 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs










