Bullets Forever: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The USA TODAY/Bloody Elbow Top 50 MMA Fights Ever, I


spread the word

So what can we expect from Ed Tapscott

One of the nice things about Ed Tapscott era is that, like Eddie Jordan, Ed is pretty vocal about what he expects from the team.  He doesn't sugercoat with his soundbytes, he's nuianced and he seems to treat reporters well.  That's good for them, but it's also good for us because we can clearly tell what he's trying to do with this team. 

I've now had a chance to watch two games and read tons of Tapscott soundbytes, so here's my read on each of his plans.

The 8-man +2 rotation.

One of the immediate things Tapscott did was to turn to what he called the "eight plus two plan."  The idea is that there are eight guys who will play solid minutes every game no matter the circumstance, with about two of the remaining four guys on the team playing based on "matchups."  The question of whether a coach should play only the same guys every game or base his substitution patterns on "feel" is a continuous debate among coaches.  Eddie Jordan, as we know, veered more toward the "feel" way of thinking, which drew a lot of ire among all of us.  

It seems Tapscott is trying to compromise.  On the one hand, there will be some guys who play every game.  But since eight players over the course of the entire season is a pretty tight rotation, he'll give two other guys a chance every game.  This serves two purposes.  One, it keeps the end of the bench guys active and ready in practice.  Two, it allows Ed to do some coaching instead of becoming predictable.  In my mind, it's a pretty good plan.

The tricky part, though, is figuring out who makes up both of these groups.  Eddie's problem this year was never playing his bench, it was treating all his bench players the same in terms of minutes.  It was that inconsistency that bugged me in particular, because it's hard to expect players to adjust to situations like the coach can.  This was a big deal with Andray Blatche, but he was hardly the only one.  Darius Songaila, for example, was asked to play center, which didn't suit his strengths.  Ditto for Nick Young and Juan Dixon at the point.  Part of this is the roster imbalance, but part of it was poor deployment of subs. 

Based on two games, it seems that the three bench guys part of the eight-man rotation are Nick Young, Andray Blatche and Darius Songaila.  After that, though, it gets murky.  Dominic McGuire has played pretty consistent minutes both games, and Tapscott is clearly trying to use him more, so one has to wonder if he's jumped into the top eight.  Since he's been healthy, the same goes for Antonio Daniels.  That's ten guys who play decent minutes already.  Then, there's Etan Thomas and Juan Dixon, who play situational minutes.  They're clearly part of the +2, but who is joining them? 

The concept of "eight plus two" is solid, but there's still work to be done to establish that.

Turning Dominic McGuire into a defensive stopper

It seems like that's a big-time goal for Tapscott.  Here's what he said about Taser:

"I'm asking him to fold himself into that role. Every team is role-defined and if you can find a niche within the team, you can find him some playing time. If he'll embrace that and go at it that way, he'll always find some time on the floor. We always need a 6-foot-8 inch athletic guy who can defend on the perimeter and can go back and get us rebounding.
The nice thing about what Dom does is Dom also has a knack for getting offensive rebounds and offensive rebounds lead to extra possessions. If he can do those things for us, he knows that he'll get a chance to play."

This doesn't surprise me in the slightest.  You know Tapscott is going to try to improve the defense, and McGuire has the tools to be a good defender.  I assume Eddie didn't play McGuire because of McGuire's shooting and dribbling deficiencies, which kind of annoyed me, to be honest.  Taser can be horrendous offensively, but like Tapscott said, he grabs offensive rebounds and showed a knack for passing in the Summer League. 

I like this move.  McGuire will embrace it and hopefully give Caron Butler more rest.  McGuire as a ninth man is better than Etan or Pech.

Speaking of Butler...

Running the offense exclusively through Caron and Antawn

Heard about this from David Aldridge on TNT.  Apparently, Tapscott called those two into his office, told them they will be the offensive focal points so long as they become leaders and left it at that.  It's clear Caron is upset by the loss of Eddie Jordan, so this was definitely a necessary thing to do on his end.  Ditto for Jamison, to be honest. 

But there are concerns.  Number one, Caron is starting to shot-jack a bit.  He had a wonderful game yesterday, but he broke the offense way too much to do it.  His passing has fallen off a bit, as his assist percentage has dropped from 21.7% to 18.3%.  He had six assists, but also had four turnovers in addition to his 18 shots.  Part of that is the lack of options around him, but either way, Tapscott needs to remind Caron that it's on him to get people involved as well as score.

With Jamison, the shots that Tapscott references must come inside rather than outside.  I hope Jamison doesn't take this to mean that he has free reign to take quick threes.

But either way, it's necessary.  You have to worry about the young guys on the team becoming jealous, but they should be encouraged to grow into their roles before they do more.

Going big

Tapscott's been experimenting with more lineups that include Caron Butler playing shooting guard.  It's probably a necessity with the number of bigs we need to develop, so Eddie Jordan certainly shouldn't have been so stubborn about keeping Butler at small forward.  That said, I've said many times that Andray Blatche looks very uncomforable playing power forward.  Putting him there more often doesn't strike me as a way to get the most out of him. 

However, I'll live with them because we need to get more out of our young bigs.  There also isn't exactly a ton of talent in that backcourt.

Andray Blatche

I love what I'm hearing from Tapscott with Blatche.  The thing is, whenever I've defended the dude, it's not because I don't realize how badly he's played.  He had a big opportunity to take that center job and didn't do it.  On the other hand, the Blatche package is incredibly complex.  It's never as simple as the "he doesn't get it, so sit him until he does" approach that Eddie Jordan took.  In his three-plus years in D.C., Blatche has been shot, been handed inconsistent minutes and has played the three, four and five positions at different points.  He's been asked to be both a wing man and an inside player.  He's been forced to defend everyone from Carmelo Anthony to Yao Ming.  For a young guy whose head isn't exactly screwed on perfectly straight, that's a lot to ask. 

That's why this quote in particular stood out to me.

I think often times that 'Dre has had some experiences of a 22-year old guy. Not that it's making that an excuse, it's just a reality. And so, that's the process we are in: trying to keep focus and concentration on the marathon of a season and that is a learning process. I'm sure if you talk to Antawn Jamison about that, he'll tell you it took years for him to get to the point where he is now as a professional where I can almost put in ink what he's going to be able to give me on any given night. That's the process any young player goes through.

In the same sentence, Tapscott is referencing the difficult things Blatche went through while also making it very clear what Blatche needs to do.  One could read this as Tapscott treating Blatche too softly, but remember, these are professional athletes with five-year contracts.  You have to treat them all differently, which is something Eddie Jordan struggled to do by the end of his tenure.  We'll see what kind of effect Tapscott has on Blatche, but my feeling is that it'll be positive. 

More than anything, Tapscott's communication skills stand out to me.  It's still early, so there's plenty of time for the players to get sick of his act, but I love that he  seems to treat them all as individuals.  He seems a little more patient, which is a big thing since we shouldn't exactly be thinking playoffs right now

Big picture

It's early, but I'm a fan of Ed.  He strikes me as the perfect interm coach for this roster right now.  He'll ride his two stars while publicly conveying specific roles for the young guys.  While it's true that the young guys somewhat unfairly tuned out Eddie Jordan, it is what it is.  Tapscott seems like a different voice for them and that'll help trememdously.  It also seems like Tapscott won't alienate the veterans, though obviously that group is more fragile at this point. 

The key to me is Tapscott's communication skills.  Like Ivan, I think that's a huge plus.  Ivan wrote that either Tapscott knows his hoops or knows how to talk about hoops.  I suspect it's mostly the latter, but that's what this team needs anyway.  For all his strengths, I've always questioned how well Eddie communicated with many of his players (see Haywood, Brendan).  I don't see that being a problem with Tapscott.

In the short term, I think we'll keep losing a lot, because without Haywood, we'll never play the type of defense Ed wants us to play.  There will be games where we just don't compete as well.  But Ed strikes me as patient and strikes me as someone who will develop the young talent on this team.  That'll serve the next coach of this team well, whether it's Ed or someone else.

0 recs | Comment 15 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thank You Tap

My two favorite “Tap” philosophies: Always have at least Caron/Antawn on the floor at all times & the 8+2.

I remember long stretches of time where EJ had an awful lineup in there, and because both Butler and Jamison were on the bench, we struggled to score. I love to see Nick Young go one-on-one, and he does it amazingly well for a 2nd year guy, but it’s still a 40% shot, whereas a Jamison scoop shot on the block or a Butler drive (not jump shot!) is closer to a 70% shot.

High percentage shots, crashing the boards, tight man-on-man D, backdoor screens… Let’s see what can happen.

December is a new month, and we have quite a history during December. Who’d love to see two 5-game win streaks?

by se7en on Nov 28, 2008 8:23 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I like Taps too

However, I think too much blame is starting to shift Jordan’s way, especially given that the Wizards of Thanksgiving night looked pretty much exactly like the Wizards of 10 other games this year.

I will also set myself up to receive the slings and arrows of the blog by saying that I think Thomas needs playing time. Before his injury he was a good role player. He could finish inside and even had some good footwork and a few moves. Statistics-wise the two centers were almost identical the year before the heart surgery. Prior to that they were also similar, although BH got more minutes. I know Thomas has looked absolutely horrible this year. I wonder if he can’t be the player he once was, or if he just needs some time to get himself back into the game. If he can become the Thomas of two years ago, then I think it’s worth giving him some minutes to help him get there. That is a player we could really use this year with BH out. Giving up on him seems foolish unless we think his body just won’t let him get back.

by MR on Nov 28, 2008 9:36 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Etan?

Slings and arrows are coming your way.

One thing I want to know is, why does Etan FREAK OUT every rebound he gets? He swings his elbows like crazy as he comes down after grabbing a rebound. Anyone else annoyed by this? I noticed it in past years, but it’s really starting to bug me.

by se7en on Nov 28, 2008 11:47 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

As Mark Jackson would say

“False hustle”

Dear Diary, JACKPOT!!!!!!!!!!

by Evander holyfield on Nov 29, 2008 12:01 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Etan is decent rebounder...

but what does it matter if most of the time the shots sink because of his bad defense. For all his poetic frills, Etan doesn’t seem to understand the game beyond rebounding and taking bad post shots.

by Fundefined on Nov 29, 2008 1:53 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fire away

I think it’s silly for intelligent, informed fans on this board to want to discard him because they don’t like him or his hair or poems or whatever.

They guy was never a great player, and he’s either washed up or can return to being a decent role player. He’s currently the only big man with any muscle. At a minimum we’re going to need him to soak up a couple of minutes on Yao, Howard, Shaq and the like. I’d rather try to nurture him back to the best player he can be rather than bury him on the bench and throw him away.

by MR on Nov 29, 2008 9:30 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Etan.

I really don’t care about his hair or his poems. (OK, so I’m actually down with his hair, but whatever.) I care about how frustrated he makes me when he’s on the basketball court. He has literally no range offensively – no one whiffs on point blank layups as much as he does – and for someone who has a big (although short) body, he really gets pushed around a lot. Also, he’s a terrible defender.

I think a lot of the anger at Etan on this board comes from his bloated contract and undeserved playing time. He’s clearly the third center on the team, and I would play O-Pec before him against teams that don’t really have a true center just to get a look at O-Pec.

The Washington Wizards: providing career scoring nights for unknown opposing bench players since 2004.

by mamemimo on Nov 29, 2008 10:08 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We can have this discussion

But you’re probably alone in thinking Etan is any good. For all of his “muscle,” the Wizards are remarkably bad defensively when Etan is on the court. This has been proven for years and years, even when Etan is healthy. What has evaporated this year for Etan is any semblance of an offensive game.

His true shooting and effective field goal percentages are way down. His rebound rate is the lowest of his career. He’s turning it over on one-fifth of his possessions, all while using more possessions that in 06/07.

He’s not there for defense and he’s not there for offense, so what exactly is the point of playing him any more than five minutes a contest?

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Nov 29, 2008 11:36 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I will agree

that this year Thomas looks as bad as any player I’ve ever seen. However my point is that he used to be a decent player. It’s a coaches job to get the most out of his players that he can. It is possible that ET is washed up. But if not I think it’s worthwhile to get him back to where he was and he can contribute to the team.

He didn’t used to whiff on point blank layups. In fact he used to have decent moves.

by MR on Nov 29, 2008 12:44 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But he plays the same position as our young guys

Etan has no future with this team no matter what. Andray Blatche and JaVale McGee do. So why play a 29-year old who probably won’t improve over two sub-22 year olds just so the 29-year old maybe “rediscovers” his game, which was mediocre anyway?

There’s no point.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Nov 29, 2008 1:51 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If you are giving up on the season.

by MR on Dec 1, 2008 1:33 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

MR i agree

that etan used to bring some value. he was good off the bench to bring physicality and bang around in the paint. and he could score inside better than people give him credit for. i think having him in the chicago playoff series helped a lot, and i think losing him in the miami playoff series hurt us a lot – although we still wouldn’t have won the miami series even with him healthy.

from what i’ve seen this year though, i’m skeptical he’s gonna return to form. i don’t think he has the same fire. i think he’s most likely done.

by DarrellWalkerFan on Nov 30, 2008 2:48 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You may be right.

As I said, I can’t tell if he’s done and washed up due to the injury, or just finding his way back to basketball.

by MR on Dec 1, 2008 1:34 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Post

Nice post. I think Tapscott is saving McGuire’s career.

by ReboundingLs on Nov 29, 2008 10:14 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Washington Wizards.
Start posting about the Wizards »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B-king_front_small
D-League Players - Who Fits?
Small
Part II- Flip's Toolbox - Backcourt Offense
248225_small
State your biases here
Small
Projecting the 09-10 Wizards Using the Current Roster and Win Shares

Recent FanPosts

Img_5674_small
Pecking order
Jameson_small
"The locker room is policed by the superstar, never the coach."
Markriggs_small
So much for McDyess - Mikki Moore here we come. Yippee!
Img_5674_small
different names
Gugliottawas_small
My First Trade Idea - Foye, Stevenson, James for Diop, Bell
Markriggs_small
An interesting stat comparison
B-king_front_small
Wizards Summer League Team
610x_small
Jazz Look To Trade Boozer
Small
Coaching Carousel Getting Out of Hand?
610x_small
Charlie Villanueva

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Lead editors

Gheorghe_small Mike Prada

Masonair_small JakeTheSnake

Contributing editors

Big_small Truth About It

Contributing writers

Markriggs_small Rook6980

Small bwoodsxyz

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports