Don't fire Eddie Jordan ... yet
Calls to fire Eddie Jordan are fashionable these days, and with good reason. The Wizards' three-point defense has gotten worse every year. The Princeton offense is sputtering, since there is no Gilbert Arenas to break it or Brendan Haywood to bounce bodies around in the middle. The team's prized youngster, Andray Blatche, is having his worst start as a pro. Rotations have no rhyme or reason. The list goes on.
But there's no reason to fire Eddie Jordan for a little while. The reason? Historically, firing a coach in the middle of the season hasn't made much of a difference on that season's success, and five games, no matter how bad they were, is too small a sample to determine whether we have no chance at the playoffs. Sure, our 0-5 start probably hurt any chance to gain a high seed, but in theory, you can fire EJ after the season anyway and start a new season with a new coach and a new direction. There's a larger pool to choose from in the offseason, whereas you're basically resigned to promoting your assistant coach if you fire someone in the middle of the season.
Here's a table of teams who changed their coaches in the middle of the season since 2005. I bolded the two biggest outliers on both ends.
| Team | Prev W/L | Fired coach | New coach | FC W/L | NC W/L | Win % Diff |
| 2007/08 Bulls | 49-33 | Scott Skiles | Jim Boylan | 9-16 | 24-32 | +0.07% |
| 2006/07 Bucks | 40-42 | Terry Stotts | Larry Krystkowiak | 23-41 | 5-13 | -0.08% |
| 2006/07 Timberwovles | 33-49 | Dwayne Casey | Randy Wittman | 20-20 | 12-30 | -0.21% |
| 2005/06 Heat | 59-23 | Stan Van Gundy | Pat Riley | 11-10 | 41-20 | +0.15% |
| 2005/06 Sonics | 52-30 | Bob Weiss | Bob Hill | 13-17 | 22-30 | -0.01% |
| 2004/05 Knicks | 39-43 | Lenny Wilkins | Herb Williams | 17-22 | 16-27 | -0.07% |
| 2004/05 Cavaliers | 35-47 | Paul Silas | Brendan Malone | 34-30 | 8-10 | -0.09% |
| 2004/05 Magic | 21-61 | Johnny Davis | Chris Jent | 31-33 | 5-13 | -0.20% |
| 2004/05 Nuggets | 43-39 | Jeff Bzdelik | George Karl | 13-15 | 32-8 | +0.44% |
| 2004/05 Blazers | 40-42 | Maurice Cheeks | Kevin Pritchard | 22-33 | 5-22 | -0.25% |
| 2004/05 Lakers | 56-26 | Rudy Tomjanovich | Frank Hamlin | 24-19 | 10-29 | -0.23% |
| 2004/05 Mavericks | 53-29 | Don Nelson | Avery Johnson | 42-22 | 16-2 | +0.23% |
| 2004/05 Grizzlies | 50-32 | Hubie Brown | Mike Fratello | 5-7 | 40-30 | +0.15% |
Let's rank them again, but now in order of most improvement to most detrimental. I'm also including the number of games played before the change. The ones italicized are the changes that simply involved promoting an assistant coach. Bolded is the median.
- 2004/05 Nuggets: Jeff Bzdelik to George Karl (28)
- 2004/05 Mavericks: Don Nelson to Avery Johnson (64)
- 2005/06 Heat: Stan Van Gundy to Pat Riley (21)
- 2004/05 Grizzlies: Hubie Brown to Mike Fratello (12)
- 2006/07 Bulls: Scott Skiles to Jim Boylan (25)
- NO IMPROVEMENT
- 2005/06 Sonics: Bob Weiss to Bob Hill (30)
- 2004/05 Knicks: Lenny Wilkins to Herb Williams (39)
- 2006/07 Bucks: Terry Stotts to Larry Krystkowiak (64)
- 2004/05 Cavaliers: Paul Silas to Brendan Malone (64)
- 2004/05 Magic: Johnny Davis to Chris Jent (64)
- 2006/07 Timberwolves: Dwayne Casey to Randy Wittman (40)
- 2004/05 Lakers: Rudy Tomjanovich to Frank Hamlin (43)
- 2004/05 Blazers: Maurice Cheeks to Kevin Pritchard (55)
There are a few lessons here. First, most teams don't really improve when changing their coach in the middle of the season. They don't usually tank like the Kevin Pritchard-less Blazers of 2004/05, but a success story like the 2004/05 Nuggets doesn't usually happen either. Most of the time, the team doesn't play all that differently. This really shouldn't be all that surprising. Most of the time, coaches are replaced in the middle of the season by their assistants, and the team rarely responds differently to someone who shares their previous coaches' perspective.
The bigger lesson is that the only coaches who have succeeded in really making a difference are established ones hired from the outside. Of the nine cases where an assistant coach took over, only two made a positive impact on the team's win/loss record, and only one of those two rose their team significantly higher in the standings. (Of course, that one person is available right now...). Even some of the improvement stories come with mitigating factors. Shaquille O'Neal was injured during Stan Van Gundy's tenure in 2005/06, for example. And while George Karl's team didn't sufer any major injuries before he took over, Jeff Bzdelik was fired after a five-game losing streak where the team played without Carmelo Anthony. Of course, we have a key guy recovering from injury as well, but any coach would benefit from Gilbert Arenas' return.
In essence, firing a coach in midseason rarely works as a motivating factor. More often than not, it signifies giving up on the season. The Wizards have been absolutely terrible in the first five games, sure, but it's only been five games. There are 77 more to potentially turn things around. If we haven't shown significant improvement by game 25, for example, then I would advocate firing Eddie and beginning the rebuilding process. By game 25, we have a better idea of where we stand as a team.
If we improve enough to get to about 43 wins and a first-round exit, we can still fire Eddie in the offseason. In the middle of the season, though, a coaching change rarely makes a positive impact on the team. The only scenario I can envision where it works this time is if we hired Avery Johnson, but I doubt Ernie's going to do that and I doubt Avery wants to leave his cushy TV position.
So don't fire Eddie Jordan. At least not yet.
Comments
Also -
In 2003-2004, Jake’s favorite team the Miami Heat lost 15 of their first 20 games. Ended up making the playoffs and even advancing to the second round. They started off the season 0-7. Turnarounds can happen.
Plus who is running away with the conference yet? It was a given that Boston and Cleveland would be good, Atlanta is a surprise but I don’t think they can keep this up, Detroit is adjusting to AI, Philly isn’t playing well etc. There is time.
by ooba on
Nov 11, 2008 9:44 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Would a Heat fan...
Post this?
Bullets Forever: A blog dedicated to the Washington Wizards with analysis, commentary, and more YouTube videos than your eyes can handle.
by JakeTheSnake on
Nov 11, 2008 10:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's always darkest before the dawn
Hopefully a winning streak is on the way.
"Would you like to shoot me now or wait till you get home." --- Daffy Duck
by George Templeton on
Nov 11, 2008 9:54 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's not going to be easy
The Jazz are pretty good and Deron Williams is back…
by Matt K. on
Nov 12, 2008 12:06 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Its a good point here.
This is why Eddie Jordan should have been fired in the off season. (Ok. Got my Eddie hating out of the way.)
My question is (and don’t laugh) is Flip Saunders available? If yes, then I’m tempted. One of the main points of this article is that assistants don’t really pan out when promoted midseason, and that’s true. Its something I’ve seen without Prada’s excellent statistical write up.
Here’s why I say fire EJ anyway. I’ve been in the anti-EJ camp for awhile now – probably a little over 2 years – and what we are seeing here is the same thing we’ve been seeing for awhile, just completely exacerbated by injuries and what’s looking like a slump for Antawn (and Caron somewhat). We’re seeing the same lack of a rotation, poor defense, undefined roles, and a lack of developing young talent. With out his cushion of Gil to prop up the offense and Haywood to prop up the defense, EJ is revealed to be what he is – a pretty mediocre coach. Not that is a terrible thing – the coach doesn’t play – but with the breakdown of once dependable veterans like AD, Eddie has less and less to lean on.
The Washington Wizards: providing career scoring nights for unknown opposing bench players since 2004.
by mamemimo on
Nov 12, 2008 12:46 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Forgot to add somewhere:
Its pretty clear that promoting Randy Ayers or Mike O’Koren to head coach is a bad idea.
The Washington Wizards: providing career scoring nights for unknown opposing bench players since 2004.
by mamemimo on
Nov 12, 2008 12:48 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I had forgotten about Flip
I’m surprised he didn’t get another gig this summer. He could potentially be a mid-season fill-in for Eddie.
My only worry is that he preaches zone defense, and I think we need someone who will preach more m2m.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on
Nov 12, 2008 1:14 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
At least he'll preach some kind of defense.
The Washington Wizards: providing career scoring nights for unknown opposing bench players since 2004.
by mamemimo on
Nov 12, 2008 10:00 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
77 more (games) to potentially turn things around
What happens if we turn things around in game 77?
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Nov 12, 2008 11:14 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
like the government in the face of the current economy
there is only so much EJ can do. this team isn’t good right now. the combination of available players is not very good at the moment.
we’re used to this team overachieving. there are too many holes right now to do so. eddie’s going to have to lay the groundwork and it’s going to take a while. hopefully he knows this. hopefully he has buy in from the organization.
everyone wanted to fire doc rivers when the celtics sucked, and that team had paul pierce and al jefferson on it.
by DarrellWalkerFan on
Nov 12, 2008 12:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Similar Analysis on Firing At Basketball Prospectus
by se7en on
Nov 12, 2008 4:44 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's a little different
That article’s more about offseason coaching changes.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on
Nov 12, 2008 4:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs










