In DC, Michael Wilbon has jumped the shark
I've enjoyed myself plenty of Michael Wilbon columns in the past. Sure, he plays his agendas (as I suppose it's the right of a nationally recognized columnist to do so), but he brings a commodity that resonates with MSM outlets and their target audiences alike.
However, with his ever increasing presence on the national scene, I can't help to feel that Wilbon tries to be outrageous, just to be outrageous. Then again, he is chums with Charles Barkley.....but Barkley has a sense of humor.
Wilbon's latest column, "For Wizards, It's a Pain to Look Ahead," was obligatory I suppose...you know, with the Wizards injury situation. Perhaps Washington Post executive editor, Marcus Brauchili, desired, posthaste, to get Wilbon's good name on an NBA piece before getting trumped by ESPN/ABC with the professional basketball season around the corner. Unfortunately, the result was a disappointing show and an unfortunate display of naiveté.
Wilbon leads with stories of an NBA "brimming with good news" and optimism. However, the first team he gushes over is the Houston Rockets and their attempts to tame Ron Artest. Sure, the Rockets made a great low-risk move in getting Artest from Sacramento for a rookie, Donte Green, and Bobby Jackson, a 35-year old who is an inch away from retirement and a starring role in a movie about Baltimore gangster, Little Melvin Williams (if you are a fan of The Wire, you'll know Williams served as inspiration for the show, along with playing 'The Deacon' - Williams and Bobby Jack are dead look alikes).
Stories out of Rockets camp read much like the high the Wizards were feeling upon leaving Richmond....great camp, excited to match-up against someone other than teammates. But if you're telling me that "optimism" in Houston is anything more than extremely guarded, you've got to be kidding yourself.
The team's two stars, Yao Ming and Tracy McGrady, have missed a combined 148 games over the past three seasons. In fact, T-Mac had knee surgery in May and has already announced that he's got an arthritic shoulder which will require surgery after this season. Rockets fans may be excited about their prospects, but if they're not walking on egg shells regarding that key issue of health, just as Wizards fans were after this latest setback with Arenas, then I'm at a loss.
But here is where Wilbon is borderline insulting....at least to the common knowledge of Wizards fans:
Haywood has his share of haters, people who'll undoubtedly use what he doesn't do (dominate the game) to argue that he won't be sorely missed, and that his absence will free up time for the rookie first-round draft pick, JaVale McGee.
That would be a silly position to take. McGee, who played only two years of college basketball, isn't ready for the NBA's big-man mayhem.
It's a misnomer to even write that first paragraph. Yes, I have been a Haywood Hater in the past. But last season more than quelled those feelings for me...and I considered myself to be amongst the far reaches of Haywood haterdom. I suppose it's plausible that Haywood would still have detractors who are relishing in his absence.....but even if such a person does exist, they are beyond "silly" and more likely not literate enough to read the words of a blog-hating scribe in the first place. And who in their right mind would expect Haywood to "dominate" a game with three other All-Stars on the team?
That's fine if Wilbon wanted to tell us that McGee isn't ready, and then a couple paragraphs later, say that the Wizards will do nothing without their youth catching fire. But using what is now a pointless debate about Haywood is a fallacious means to his end.
Look, I understand the point Wilbon is making. When healthy, the Wizards may compete in the east, but when not, the chances are slim. Not exactly ground-breaking material. Maybe I'm overreacting, but I don't think it's beyond reason to expect better from a national media figure. I'm not saying I won't continue to sporadically enjoy PTI, or that a greatly penned column is out of question for Wilbon in the future. I'm just saying that when it comes to sports inside the Beltway, if Wilbon were to look behind him right now, he might see a shark swimming below.
0 recs |
9
comments
Read Related
Comments
You're over-reacting
I understand your point, but you might acknowledge that…
a) a lot of casual fans still would put BTH in the bottom half of starting centers.
b) ultimately he agrees that this is going to hurt us.
So he’s being a little dramatic. All he’s saying is that just becuase Brendan isn’t a name-brand center and known difference-maker, people shouldn’t assume this is going to be easy.
by RamVA on Oct 9, 2008 11:28 AM EDT 0 recs
Agreed
I think you’re being pretty over-dramatic. He is defending Brendan, and no doubt casual fans still think of him as soft. One great year did not change the town’s perceptions of him.
by mfish on
Oct 9, 2008 11:37 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Also agree
I sat next to a Wizards fan at the last Boston game at VC last year, and he was ripping BTH the whole game. Saying he has tiny hands, and is “seven feet of nothing”. And we actually won the game – can’t imagine what it would have been like if we would have lost. For whatever reason, he still has his fervent detractors out there.
As for the other topic, I don’t think Wilbon’s all bad – he seems to do well with the access he has. Perhaps it’s just a personal preference.
by AndNone on
Oct 9, 2008 12:57 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Yea....
I understand that Wilbon is trying to appeal to a wider audience, but that doesn’t mean he has to be out of touch (at least that’s how he comes across in my opinion).
Using Shaq as a standard of measurement for Haywood is passé, not to mention unreasonable. Shaq, in terms of his physical stature, in an anomaly….and it’s no longer 2003.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on Oct 9, 2008 12:29 PM EDT 0 recs
i don't expect much from wilbon i guess
i thought the column was topical. not a great column, but i’m glad he lent his clout to a story about how the news surrounding the wiz of late sucks – cause it does – even if it reads like he wrote it up in about 5 minutes. it sounds like he feels at least a little bit for the hometown fans, even though for the most part he’s always disliked the organization.
tom knott is the only columnist who actually seems like a fan of the wiz.
by DarrellWalkerFan on Oct 9, 2008 12:45 PM EDT 0 recs
Health
“When healthy, the Wizards may compete in the east, but when not, the chances are slim.”
Substitute ANY team name in there, and the same sentence would be factual.
The Boston Celtics went on an incredible run last year…. with the top 8 players ALL playing in over 75 games each…!!!
Show me one team, over the last 10 years that lost their Star player for the whole year, lost another important player for an entire year, and still had other significant injuries – that still made the Playoffs….. NOT ONE…. oops….. except the Wizards.
Good teams need a generous dose of health in order to have a chance to advance in the Playoffs.
by Rook6980 on Oct 9, 2008 1:09 PM EDT 0 recs
Wilbon mailed it a long time ago
All WIlbon does is get on his soap box and lecture people about how things should be according to Wilbon. His columns rarely have any flow at all anymore. I am way over PTI and Kornheiser is absolutely terrible on MNF. I loved his radio show too.
As for hating Haywood, I agree totally about ripping on Brenda for years. I was disgusted about the fights with Etan and his sulking on the bench. When I went to games, I watched his aloof interaction with teammates and it pissed me off.
However, Haywood brought it every game last season and he should be commended for it. My opinion of him has changed and I was upset to hear about his injury.
Even a casual Wizards fan would know that Brendan played well last season.
Have the Rockets won a playoff series this decade?
What? They don't have TV in the D-League? Don't watch me, watch TV.
by Mac G on Oct 9, 2008 1:09 PM EDT 0 recs
Who thinks that?
I soured on Wilbon’s columns some time ago. I grew up reading them, but most of what he writes these days is unfortunate. The paragraph after the one quoted sort-of redeems Haywood, but what bugs me is that he has to quote a player saying Haywood is efficient. Why not just look at his numbers and find out yourself?
The biggest issue I have with that first paragraph isn’t the Haywood part, it’s the McGee part. Who, exactly, is saying that McGee should be getting a bigger role? I don’t think the team is (are they?). Most (sensible) fans know that his strong performances are coming in preseason games. Saying McGee should have a bigger role is a silly position to take, just like Wilbon says. But Wilbon’s the only one I know of who’s mentioned it.
by Jon L on Oct 9, 2008 2:21 PM EDT 0 recs
common tactic
I think this becoming a pretty common tactic nowadays, especially in the political arena. You make up something outrageous that “they” say, and then refute it.
“They say this. Here’s why ‘they’ are wrong.”
So never mind that the fans realize Haywood’s importance and are very disappointed that he’s injured. Also forget that McGee was an unpopular draft pick and no one is expecting him to get any meaningful time.
Instant column:
“‘THEY’ say that Haywood is a weak center and that McGee needs a bigger role”
Here’s why “they” are wrong.
by hotplate on
Oct 10, 2008 9:11 AM EDT
up
0 recs









