CBA, Cap, Roster and Contract musings
Editor's Note: I felt this was worth putting on the front page as somewhat of a Public Service Announcement. Thanks to Rook6980 for putting this together. -Truth
Why don't they just drop XXXXX player?
You've heard it before.... Posters asking why the problem with the "Salary Cap" -
Why don't they drop Pecherov and free up Cap Space? Why don't they just drop McGuire?. Why not just drop Songaila?. Why not just drop (insert player name here)?
The Wizards WON'T just drop Pecherov (or McGuire, or Young, or any other Wizards player under contract) because almost ALL Standard NBA contracts are guaranteed. (The Wizards have 13 players under contract for the 2008-2009 season, and all of them are guaranteed contracts)
In other words, they would still have to pay him, AND his salary would still count against the Salary Cap AND, more importantly, against the Luxury Tax.
So, if they just dropped a player under contract - they would be paying a salary, eating up Cap and Tax space, and getting nothing in return.
Since Arenas is injured, why can't the Wizards just sign another player until he returns?
Again, insert any player name, but the question remains the same. During the regular season, NBA teams must maintain a minimum roster size of 13 players and a maximum roster size of 15 players. Injured players count against the roster size. If the Wizards are at 15, they do not have any roster room to sign another player.
The other consideration is the Luxury Tax. For the 2008-2009 season, the Wizards are extremely close to the Luxury Tax ceiling of $71.15 million - so signing another player, even at a minimum salary might put them over the Tax ceiling.
Last year, when the Wizards were struggling because of so many injuries, many people asked "Why not just go over the Tax ceiling" to sign another player ?
For every dollar that a Team exceeds the Luxury Tax threshold, they must pay a dollar-for-dollar tax. At the end of the year, that money is pooled together and paid to the teams that stayed under the threshold. I believe the 2008 payment was about $3 Million.
So, let's say you're the Wizards GM, and you're right up against the Luxury Tax threshold; but you need to sign another player. You need a PG, because Arenas is injured and Daniels has a bad wrist. You find a D-League rookie that can be a band-aid solution, and sign him to a 1-year deal at the Rookie Minimum of $442,114. But then you have to pay $442,114 into the Luxury Tax pool... At the end of the year, you miss out on the $3 Million payment; So that D-League rookie actually cost your team almost $3.9 Million .
You can see why teams want to avoid the Luxury Tax.
This represents the view of the user who wrote the FanPost, and not the entire Bullets Forever community. We're a place of many opinions, not just one.
2 recs |
11 comments
Comments
Nice reminder.....
The commentors on Wizards Insider should especially be reminded of this.
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Oct 10, 2008 5:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
dont forget
about all those people who call into 980 to bash the wizards for not re-signing roger mason for $4 mil/a year
by joshp on
Oct 10, 2008 5:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or those that said
“Why give Gilbert 111 million when they could have signed Baron Davis and Emeka Okafor with it!”
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on
Oct 10, 2008 5:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
potentially we could have
if we had renounced both gil and aj.
i realize that’s not entirely realistic, and i wouldn’t want okafor, but anyway… two years from now we all might be wishing we had done that.
by DarrellWalkerFan on
Oct 10, 2008 6:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
actually
I don’t think they would not have been far enough under the Salary Cap to sign both Baron Davis and Emeka Okafor – even if the Wizards renounced both Arenas and Jamison.
by Rook6980 on
Oct 10, 2008 7:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rook's right
Renouncing both would have put our payroll around 44 million with the cap coming in at 58 million.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Mike Prada on
Oct 11, 2008 1:43 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Plus
It assumes that if the money is equal, both players would choose Washington. I think this is the big fallacy in the we should have dropped xxx and signed yyy argument. Players are unpredictable. There’s no guarantee that if you target a certain free agent that you will be able to get him.
If you let Gil go but fail to sign Baron Davis, you’d be left with Antonio Daniels and Dee Brown as your point guards….Never Mind. Get well, Gil.
by hotplate on
Oct 11, 2008 9:49 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that's totally not what i had in my head.
if we only had 14 mill available, that does change things. probably couldn’t have gotten two big names with that.
but if we’re playing the hindsight game, i would have loved to have landed brand with that 14 mill.
that is, until he has a career ending injury in december, right when gil comes back and becomes league MVP.
by DarrellWalkerFan on
Oct 12, 2008 11:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My hindsight is going to be so awesome in the future.....
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Oct 10, 2008 8:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I read this yesterday…. and again today…
It’s rare that I find something that is funny the first time, and every time thereafter.
I’m still laughing. (I sure hope you meant that as deep, wry humor – and that I didn’t just insult you)….
(grin)
by Rook6980 on
Oct 11, 2008 10:37 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ha.....yea, I was joking....
Representing DC with Wizards & Stuff - Truth About It Dot Net
by Truth About It on
Oct 11, 2008 2:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs














